American Criminal Court System

In: Other Topics

Submitted By natesgirl143
Words 1147
Pages 5
American Criminal Court System
Kabie Goss
CJA/224
July 14, 2014
Samyra Hicks

American Criminal Court System
When thinking about the American Criminal Court System, there is a lot to think about. Most cases are not just opened and closed in one day like they are on television, and there are different courts to handle different situations. In this paper I will be describing what a court is and its purpose, as well as defining what the dual court system is. I will also describe the role that early codes, common law, and precedent played in the development of courts. Lastly, I will identify the role of the courts in criminal justice today.
Court and its Purpose
Merriam-Webster defines a court in three different ways, but they all seem to intertwine. The first definition is; “a formal legal meeting in which evidence about crimes, disagreements, etc., is presented to a judge and often a jury so that decisions can be made according to the law.” The second being, “a place where legal cases are heard.” The third definition states, “An official group of people (such as a judge and jury) who listen to evidence and make decisions about legal cases.” There are many different types of courts at the local, state, and federal level. Courts can hear both civil and criminal cases.
The purpose of the court is to settle legal disputes whether civil or criminal, through a legal process, while protecting the rights and liberties of everyone involved, and to administer justice fairly. The court hears testimony from each side before rendering a verdict.
Dual Court System
The United States has what is called a dual court system. This system is what separates a state court from a federal court. “A dual court system is a legal organizational structure that supports two contemporaneous court systems: usually one at a local level, and one at a national level” (What is…...

Similar Documents

Georgia Court System Outline

... municipal courts operating in Georgia. F. Superior Court 1. The superior court exercises both civil and criminal jurisdiction. Superior court judges preside over all felony trials, have exclusive jurisdiction over divorces and may correct errors made by limited jurisdiction courts. The forty-nine superior court circuits in Georgia are made up of one or more counties; each circuit has a chief superior court judge and a number of other judges as authorized by the General Assembly. 2. Superior court judges are constitutional officers who are elected to four-year terms in circuit-wide nonpartisan elections. Vacancies that occur in superior court may be filled by appointment of the Governor. A candidate for superior court judge must be at least 30 years of age, a lawyer who has practiced for seven years, and a resident of the state for three years. G.Jury Service 1. Jury trials are a hallmark of the American legal system. Each day around the state, our trial courts require hundreds of ordinary citizens to report to the courthouse for jury duty. Both a right and responsibility, service as a juror places the individual citizen in a central role in the justice system. III. COURTS OF REVIEW A. Court of Appeals of Georgia 1. The Court of Appeals is the court of first review for many civil and criminal cases heard by the trial courts. The purpose of such a review is to correct legal errors or errors of law made at the trial level, not to alter jury......

Words: 1615 - Pages: 7

The Us Court System

...The U.S. Court system and Jurisdiction of The Federal Courts, and The State (Ohio) Court System Cassandra Jones PA101 Kaplan University Instructor: Emily Ryan The U.S. Court system and Jurisdiction of The Federal Courts, and The State (Ohio) Court System In this paper I will be writing about the organization of the U. S court system. The jurisdiction limits of the federal courts and their requirements for filing in that jurisdiction. I will also talk about the Ohio federal and state court systems and the similarities and differences of how they do their jurisdiction. The U.S court system is made up of two different types of court systems; the federal and state court. The federal court is also made up of two different types of systems as well. The first federal court is Article III court and the second is the Article I court (United State Courts, 2010). The Article III court got their name because as stated by the U.S courts “they derive their power from Article III of the Constitution” (United State Courts, 2010). The Article III courts are as followed the U.S District Court, the U.S Circuit Court of Appeal, and the U.S court of International Trade. These court systems judges are appointed by the President of the U.S with advice and consent of the senate and hold office during good behavior(United States Courts, 2010). There are ninety-four districts in the U.S for the U.S...

Words: 712 - Pages: 3

History of the Criminal Court System

...History of the U.S. Criminal Court System CJA/491 Amy Miller 5-27-2013 Professor Angela Bradrick Introduction This paper will examine the historic development of the American courts. It will define common law heritage and discuss the evolution of American law. It will also discuss, compare, and contrast the evolution of the United States courts, including state vs. federal, and trial vs. appellate courts. Common Law Heritage and the Evolution of American Law Back in the time of medieval England, common law heritage was established.  Because of the unwritten laws of this time, judges used customs and societal norms to determine what laws were sufficient for what crimes.  These were considered judge made laws.  Judges would decide cases by using past rulings and sentencing to determine current similar cases; this was called stare decisis (Meyer & Grant, 2003).  It was important for judges to use this procedure, making it a less difficult to prosecute each case independently.  According to Meyer and Grant (2003), common law was un-codified, meaning these were unwritten laws.  As stated earlier, judges used previous verdicts to identify what forms of prosecution and sentencing of law-breaking acts would be implemented in current cases.  Codified laws, or written laws were also defined by pre-existing customs, but they were written statutes in which society could familiarize with and recognize as a law.  The changes came about, when the common laws were...

Words: 1086 - Pages: 5

Racism in the American Criminal Justice System

...Introduction With practices aimed at reducing discrimination such as affirmative action, the argument has been made that racial discrimination is no longer a pressing issue in American society.[1] It has further been argued that the Constitution protects all citizens, and race has no weight in the American criminal justice system.[2] While the United States Constitution guarantees equal treatment of all citizens, regardless of race, racism still exists in the American law enforcement and criminal justice systems. In this era with the end of official institutional racism, there has been a corresponding shift from de jure racism to a de facto racism where members of minority groups, especially African Americans, are subject to unequal protection of the laws and excessive in the American criminal justice system, particularly in drug law enforcement.[3] Drug law enforcement is far more discretionary than for other offenses. It is for the police to decide when and where they will seek to make drug arrests, and what priority they will place on enforcing drug laws.[4] Since the war on drugs began in the 1980s, two general trends have been identified. First, there has been a substantial increasing in the number of drug arrests overall; and second, black males have constituted an increasing proportion of these arrests.[5] Based on this evidence, it would be natural to assume that the number of arrests is proportional to the crime rate – that blacks began using drugs...

Words: 3035 - Pages: 13

Dual Court System

...What is the dual court system? What is the reasoning behind having a dual court system in the United States? What would happen if there was not a dual court system in the United States? A dual court system is separate from the state court system and federal court system, the state deals with criminal and civil cases. Whereas the federal court may hear criminal and civil cases that are associated to the federal constitution. The reason is because years earlier the central government was very weak and states government was powerful. America has 50, court state systems due to the need for each state to retain significant authority and judicial it’s separate from the federal court system. Whereas state court evolved from early colonial arrangements, federal courts where created by the United States constitutions (Schmalleger F, 2009). There is a need for greater legitimacy a national policy mediates identities in ways that enrich and provide a understandings of constitutional. Dual court system is impacted by history due to the concept of two court systems still in force. Changes have been made to the each individual court record to ensue the record runs smooth, just like models adopted by state court systems. It may help if United State adopted a new court system that could handle all criminal court cases, or a new system that could handle certain court cases. The federal court judges could also hear traffic court cases. The state and federal court systems work side by side, it......

Words: 281 - Pages: 2

History of Court System

...According to the Article Three of the US Constitution, jurisdictional authority of the United States, intend to be conferred on the Supreme Court and also on lower Courts as the Congress may well regularly decree and start. The initial activities of the freshly formed Congress stood to permit the Judiciary Act of 1789 that completed requirements for the Supreme Court. It specified that it will contain of five Associate Justices who would come across in the country's capital and a Chief Justice. In the beginning, Chief Justice chosen was John Jay by George Washington who functioned from 1789 to 1795. The Judiciary Act (1789) moreover specified that the authority of the Supreme Court will comprise appellate authority in superior public cases and in which government judges administrated on centralized decrees. Additionally, the Supreme Court justices were obligatory to function on the U.S. circuit judges. The cause for this was to ensure that adjudicators from the uppermost court will be associated with the prime trial law court study about the processes of the state court of law. Additionally, in the primary years of the Supreme Court, the judges had diminutive regulation over which cases they got. Until 1891 they were unable to examine progressions by certiorari and discarded the right of involuntary petition. Although the Supreme Court is the uppermost court of law in the country, it has incomplete administrative right over the federal courts but it wasn't given the...

Words: 557 - Pages: 3

Dual Court System

...Our court system is a dual-court system. Our nation's founders stressed a need for individual states to maintain significant legislative authority and judicial autonomy apart from federal dominion. States were free to create laws and develop a court system to define such laws. Unique features include the fact that state courts do not hear cases of federal law and the federal courts only decide issues of state law when there is a problem among state statutes and constitutional guarantees (Judicial Learning Center, 2012). The dual-court system in America consist of courts on two levels: the federal and the state (Judicial Learning Center, 2012). The federal government maintains to itself dominance over matters that are national in scope while relinquishing control to the states over other matters. This structure necessitates the existence of court systems in each resulting jurisdiction that are empowered to rule on matters from the unique perspective of that jurisdiction's constitution. Some of the major differences are that federal laws are enforced in federal courts, and state laws in state courts. In addition, federal courts have limited jurisdiction, while state courts have general jurisdiction. These differences are in theory, but in practice it is more complex. For example, bank robbery is tried in federal court because it is a federal crime. Stealing from Walmart is robbery and that is a state crime unless it is committed on federal property. Some areas of...

Words: 367 - Pages: 2

American Court

...American court system paper Justin Burnett CJA 224 April 30, 2014 David Benson American Criminal Court System American criminal court system and its purpose: The criminal court system in America is a tool that communities use for standards to be enforced and necessary to protect individual and the whole communities. The action taken against the lawbreakers is like that it solves three purposes. It takes away harmful people and removes them from the society; it uses others as an example to not be a part of criminal behavior; and it gives society a chance to change criminals into law-abiding citizens. This particular system has three specific parts: the courts the police, and the corrections and each one have their own different tasks. All these three bodies are depending on each other. The main purpose of American court is to give everyone the opportunity to justice; by punishing and convicting the guilty and help them stop doing bad and protect the innocent. It also guards the individual rights and freedoms. Here, all persons treated equally. If there is any conflict then trials can be the solution but the courts should be used at last. As there are two cases civil and criminal. Courts have two duties first find out the facts of disputes and second are what law is to apply on that fact. Dual court system A dual court system is a double organized entity that helps both courts one at a national level and one local. Australia and The United States are having...

Words: 834 - Pages: 4

Court System

... assigned to each of the circuits and their duty was to periodically go to a city in each state in the circuit and hold a circuit court in combination with the district judge of that state” (Trethan, 2011). The point of the circuit courts was to decide cases for most federal criminal cases along with suits between citizens of different states and civil cases brought by the U.S. government. “The number of Supreme Court justices involved in each circuit court was reduced to one in 1793” (Trethan, 2011 ). As the United States grew, the number of circuit courts and the number of Supreme Court justices grew to ensure that there was one justice for each circuit court. The circuit courts lost the ability to judge on appeals with the creation of the US Circuit Court of Appeals in 1891 and was abolished completely in 1911. The Mexican legal system has historical roots that go back to 16th century. Spain ruled Mexico for over three hundred years and consequently left its mark on the legal system of Mexico. “The link to Pre-Colombian indigenous law is traced through the Aztec Empire which was the dominant political power in Mexico at the time of the arrival of the Spaniards” (Zamora, 2004). The Spanish conquistadores found an advanced indigenous legal system in place when they conquered the Aztec Empire. Spanish law was most dominant in the area of private law in matters of commerce, property, family inheritance, and obligations, Spanish law was used almost exclusively. In the area of...

Words: 1226 - Pages: 5

Court System Analysis

...Court System Analysis Patricia Morse AJS/504 June 8, 2015 Deana Bohenek This is an interview with Justice Tom C. Clark one of the nine Justices for the United States Supreme Court. The case Miranda v. Arizona was argued February 28, March 1st, and 2nd 1966 the decision was June 13th, 1966. The vote was 5 to 4 in favor of Miranda v. Arizona. Q. Where did this case originate? Mr. Justice Clark Miranda v. Arizona originated in Phoenix Arizona, when Ernesto Miranda an immigrant was arrested for kidnapping and rape, he was taken into custody and question for two hours by police until he confessed. What the police did was not inform Mr. Miranda of two rights he is entitled to. The 5th and 6th Amendment, the right to protect himself against self-incrimination and the right to have counseling. The case went to court, the prosecutor used his confession as evidence along with other evidence. Miranda was convicted and sentenced for 20 to 30 years in prison. Q. Were there any other cases similar to this being considered by the United States Supreme Court? Mr. Justice Clark Yes three others Virgira v. New York, Westover v. United States, California v. Stewart, all three of these cases were based on the accused were not informed of their 5th...

Words: 1127 - Pages: 5

Criminal Court Experience

...For my criminal court experience I was visiting a friend of mine who is in Suffolk Law School in Boston, Massachusetts. I went to a criminal court with him because I had nothing else to do that day. When I went I had not taken this class before and he was in his first year at law school. As part as his study plan he too had to observe a criminal court. At the time I was not as interested in the case but I was able to take a few key findings away from my experience. As I stepped into the court room I was able to come across a post-arraignment court. I thought this would be the most interesting side of our criminal justice system. The post-arraignment is where the judge will enforce the punishment and making sure any restitution was paid for based on the crime that was conducted. Given my minimal experience of what went on inside a court room the most surprising thing I noticed right away was how much power the judges had. The judge is always addressed in a formal way and will even sit higher than everyone else. This legitimate power was respected despite even the most dangerous criminals and well educated lawyers presented. The social training that we learn throughout our lives is always to respect judges. The same goes for policeman but many people disregard officers and their power. The same was not true for judges. This was a very surprising to me given both careers have an impact on people’s lives. I was lost in thought as these observations went through my mind. It’s...

Words: 789 - Pages: 4

Court System

... centuries have changed, so did those who practiced law. Those who studied law became more abundant, with the old way of the courts were starting to be taken over by a more contemporary court system. Each state that entered the Constitution or American Colonies, started to form their own set of rules and governing, which is when the State Court system was made. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENTS OF THE FEDERAL COURTS Formerly when the Constitution was created, the United States had the Articles of Confederation. What the Articles of Confederation was, is a document that assigned too much authority to one side and not enough to the other, meaning when it came to legislative and executive authority, there was no separation. In 1787 (N.A., 2012) those that signed the Articles of Confederation formed together in Philadelphia to go over what had been signed, and make corrections. Since this was done, there were no longer two branches as before (legislative and executive), but it also added the judicial branch. At the conference in Philadelphia, there were two different plans that were brought up for discussion. First, was the Virginia Plan and then shortly after was the New Jersey Plan (Chin & Stern, 1997). Even though both of these plans had potential behind them, there were also cons to these plans. The first line of Article III of the United States Constitution begins like this, “The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court and in such......

Words: 1144 - Pages: 5

Court System Paper

...Court System Paper Teresa Wilson CJA 204 Dec. 5, 2011 Mrs. Dorey Court System Paper The court systems have been around for hundreds of years. Our court system has come a very long way since then. I mean back then our first court was actually back in the 1789 which was small and hierarchy compared to the was courts are now days. In the 1789 the first bill was put into action. From this we got what is called “the original American court system for resolving criminal and civil dispute.”( Schmalleger, 2009. Our state courts have developed several models. They have followed the Federal Judiciary Act of 1789, which later became the reorganization Act of 1801, which has made more models for the state courts. They follow the federal model development three-tiered structure. They are 1.) Trial courts of limited jurisdiction, 2.) Trial courts of general jurisdiction and 3.) Appellate courts. It was soon found that the three-tiered models were not that great. It did provide local and specialized courts proliferated. Traffic courts, magistrates courts, and probate courts, just to name a few, that functioned at a lower levels. The (ABA) better known as the American Bar Association and even the American Judicator Society. Helped the simplification of state court structures, they also help the state form the models. Among the state courts there are different levels of courts, they are the state trial courts that criminal cases begin. In the trail courts...

Words: 1094 - Pages: 5

Illinois Court System

... circuit, subject to the overall administrative authority of the Supreme Court. Circuit Judges may hear any case assigned to them by the Chief Judge. Associate Judges may not preside over criminal cases in which the defendant is charged with an offense punishable by imprisonment for one year or more (felonies), unless approval is received from the Supreme Court. Circuit Judges are elected for a term of six years; Associate Judges are appointed by the Circuit Judges in accordance with Supreme Court rules for a four-year term ("Welcome to Illinois," 2011). When a Supreme, Appellate or Circuit Court Judgeship is vacant or newly created, candidates are nominated at Primary Elections and elected at the General Election. However, any Judge previously elected may, at the expiration of his or her term, have his or her name submitted to the voters on a special judicial ballot without party designation and without an opposing candidate, on the sole question of whether he or she shall be retained in office for another term. The Illinois Courts Commission, composed of one Supreme Court Justice, two Appellate Court Judges, two Circuit Judges and two citizens, has the authority after notice and public hearing (1) to remove from office, suspend without pay, censure or reprimand any member of the judiciary for willful misconduct in office, persistent failure to perform his or her duties or other conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice or that brings the judicial......

Words: 606 - Pages: 3

Dual Court System

...Rehabilitation Hector Rodriguez Jr CJA/492 December 3, 2011 Professor Jeffrey Newton Rehabilitation When one thinks of rehabilitation they refer to fixing something, such as when you are injured. You get rehabilitation to help you fix or strengthen your injury. When we look at corrections rehabilitation is fixing a person’s mind set. Showing them what is acceptable behavior and what is not. So when we look at this type of rehabilitation we want to reeducate someone to understand that criminal behavior is wrong. Rehabilitation has been around for a while, as early, as the 1800’s in prison. The prison was trying to succeed in showing the prisoners through labor and the use of discipline to show prisoners proper behavior. Early doctors and psychiatrist found that criminal behavior was a disease. They did studies that showed a certain person of a center genetic makeup, height, weight hair and eye color. These findings would be the description of a criminal; it would be found to be false. The true era of rehabilitation from the 1950’s to 1970, in the beginning it was not taken serious and was not part of the curriculum. There was nothing defined to give direction to state facilities and there was no guidance on how to develop a program. The first type of a rehabilitation program was penology; it was a scientific method to punish people. James V. Bennett believes in the individual treatment of criminals in the penal system based on observations and...

Words: 1278 - Pages: 6