Free Essay

An Explanation of Augustine’s Conception of the City of God, a Dichotomy Between the Heavenly City and Earthly City.

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By Addawray
Words 799
Pages 4
AN EXPLANATION OF AUGUSTINE’S CONCEPTION OF THE CITY OF GOD, A DICHOTOMY BETWEEN THE HEAVENLY CITY AND EARTHLY CITY.
St. Augustine was an influential philosopher who lived in the fourth and fifth century AD. He conceived the world to be made up of two cities namely the earthly city and the heavenly city (the city of God). The city of God as conceived by Augustine is founded on the hope of heavenly peace and spiritual salvation. The main purpose of the city of God is to save mankind from sin and sufferings. This city is inhabited by holy persons and angels sacrificing self-interest and worshiping God only. These angels and holy persons do not look after their personal interest and have great regard for morality and ethics. The earthly city on the other hand was conceived by Augustine to be founded on appetitive and possessive impulses that are found in the lower categories of animals. The inhabitants of the earthly city are basically concerned with their personal interest. They do not have regard for morality, virtue and ethics. The inhabitants of the earthly city are usually willing to do anything so long as their parochial interest will be served. The inhabitants of the earthly city are more or less slaves of their desires and thus forget the will and wishes of God. They also forget to worship him.
The behavior and attitude of the inhabitants of the heavenly city is that of goodliness and sacrifice. Because the heavenly city is inhabited by angels and holy persons, goodliness and sacrifice are virtues that are very common there. The inhabitants of the heavenly city are good towards each other and sacrifice their personal interest for the good of others and society at large. Jesus the Christ is perceived to have been a citizen of the heavenly city and as such had the virtue of sacrifice. He gave off his life on the cross so that mankind will be saved from eternal condemnation. If he were to be of the earthly city, he may not have sacrificed his life for others. Goodliness, honesty and sacrifice are unknown virtues in the earthly city. The earthly city is rather full of evil, ruthless, dishonest and selfish interest seeking people. In the earthly city the people selfishly pursue their interest even at the detriment of society. For instance, some public officials will selfishly siphon monies meant for the poor and needy in the society into their private accounts to satisfy their desire for more money. Again in the earthly city, some individuals may be having more resources than they actually need but will be unwilling to share with some the numerous people who do not have any at all.
The heavenly city is not raged by feuds and conflicts. Several conflicts arise as a result of competing selfish interest with no individual or group willing to let go of their interest. But because the heavenly city is devoid of selfish people such conflicts do not arise. Peace is bountiful in the heavenly city as well as good relations among the inhabitants of the heavenly city. According to Augustine’s conception of the world, eternal peace can only be found in the heavenly city. On the other hand, the earthly city is characterized by feuds, animosity and conflicts. Feuds and animosity according to Augustine are very common among the princes, administrators and common people. Because of the selfish nature of the inhabitants of the earthly city, there are always several conflicting interests which breed animosity among the inhabitants. There is no absolute peace in the earthly city because they continuously make arms to make war and make war to make peace. When war is made to achieve peace, such peace when achieved will only last for a short while. The heavenly city and the earthly city are thus distinct in this regard.
According to Augustine’s conception of the world every man is a citizen of two cities. That is the city of God and the earthly city. He further points out that man is made up of spirit (soul) and flesh. The flesh of man inhabits in the earthly city and remains there even at death whereas the soul of man moves up to the heavenly city at death. The flesh which is of the earthly city according to Augustine will pass away whereas the soul which is of the heavenly city is eternal. Thus the heavenly city is eternal while the earthly city is transient.
In conclusion, there is a great dichotomy between Augustine’s conceptions of the heavenly city and the earthly city as elucidated above.

Reference 1. Gerald O’Daly, Augustine’s City of God: A Readers Guide, Clarendon Press, 1999 2. Saint Augustine; Marcus D. D. Dods, The City of God (Modern Library, 1950)

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Politics, Theology

...theology, political theory and philosophy and poses acute questions about the basic moral foundations of liberal societies. Lord Plant focuses on the role that religious belief can and ought to play in argument about public policy in a pluralistic society. He examines the potential political implications of Christian belief and the ways in which it may be deployed in political debate. The book is a contribution to the modern debate about the moral pluralism of western liberal societies, discussing the place of religious belief in the formation of policy and asking what sorts of issues in modern society might be the legitimate objects of a Christian social and political concern. Raymond Plant has written an important study of the relationship between religion and politics which will be of value to students, academics, politicians, church professionals, policy makers and all concerned with the moral fabric of contemporary life. r ay m on d pl an t is Professor of European Political Thought at the University of Southampton and a Member of the House of Lords. He was a Home affairs spokesperson for the Labour Party from 1992 to 1996, and Master of St Catherine's College, Oxford, from 1994 to 2000. Lord Plant's main publications are Social and Moral Theory in Casework (1970), Community and Ideology: An Essay in Applied Moral Philosophy (1974), Hegel (1974), Political Philosophy and Social Welfare (with H. Lesser and P. TaylorGooby, 1979), Philosophy, Politics and Citizenship (with......

Words: 144283 - Pages: 578

Free Essay

Essential Thinkers

...A618C90F-C2C6-4FD6-BDDB-9D35FE504CB3 First American paperback edition published in 2006 by Enchanted Lion Books, 45 Main Street, Suite 519, Brooklyn, NY 11201 Copyright © 2002 Philip Stokes/Arcturus Publishing Limted 26/27 Bickels Yard, 151-153 Bermondsey Street, London SE1 3HA Glossary © 2003 Enchanted Lion Books All Rights Reserved. The Library of Congress has cataloged an earlier hardcover edtion of this title for which a CIP record is on file. ISBN-13: 978-1-59270-046-2 ISBN-10: 1-59270-046-2 Printed in China Edited by Paul Whittle Cover and book design by Alex Ingr A618C90F-C2C6-4FD6-BDDB-9D35FE504CB3 Philip Stokes A618C90F-C2C6-4FD6-BDDB-9D35FE504CB3 ENCHANTED LION BOOKS New York Contents The Presocratics Thales of Miletus . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Pythagoras of Samos . . . . . 10 Xenophanes of Colophon 12 Heraclitus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 The Scholastics St Anselm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 St Thomas Aquinas . . . . . . . 50 John Duns Scotus . . . . . . . . . 52 William of Occam . . . . . . . . . 54 The Liberals Adam Smith . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 Mary Wollstonecraft . . . . 108 Thomas Paine . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 Jeremy Bentham . . . . . . . . . 112 John Stuart Mill . . . . . . . . . . 114 Auguste Comte . . . . . . . . . . . 116 The Eleatics Parmenides of Elea . . . . . . . 16 Zeno of Elea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 The Age of Science Nicolaus Copernicus . . . . . . 56 Niccolò......

Words: 73655 - Pages: 295