Introduction Microsoft was founded in 1975 by Bill Gates & Paul Allen. When Microsoft began in the early days they only had a few employees; who consisted of the two Co-founders and 9 other employees to run the brand new start up Tech Company. Microsoft original organization structure was one of functionality, people running divisions or departments. Today Microsoft runs a traditional organization structure with the executives at the top, managers in the middle, and supervisors at the production level. This allows for full control over the entire company while still being effective. If you are the type of person that can thrive under top down management style then Microsoft would be a perfect match to work under Microsoft leadership. The structure that Microsoft built has lasted since 1975, They have managed to take over the computer software business to the point that even their competors have to us Microsoft operating system to use their equipment.

Bureaucratic approach utilized
Microsoft is not different from many other large organizations with 10,000’s employees. There has to be an organizational structure and strategy in place for organizing Microsoft’s strategy, and this is the type of business that is known as a According to (wisegeek 2003-2016) “hierarchy or a top-down structure. With this approach, Microsoft has specific way the processes, and task allocation and management focus on a vertical structure that strictly defines a chain of command. Understanding bureaucracy of this type allows relatively little open communication between different levels of employees, with those who are assigned to work within departments normally being assigned jobs and told what to do, without much of an ability” (para. 2). Microsoft Below are the two most critical questions that you should address when you want to develop a surefire strategy to improve your resources.
1. What are the types of people you need to be able to meet your strategic goals; and,
2. What initiatives or programs you plan to implement to be able to gain trust and loyalty among employees?
Companies that use hierarchical structures of this type are faced with the same types of common problems that face top down organizations. Strict and ridged bureaucratic structures have been common in organizations. The fact that corporate culture are very important to the soundness of Microsoft, where the value the intellectual qualities in a employee rather than experience.
Over the years as Microsoft has grown and expanded this organization have begun to use more of a traditional organization where there is a strong culture of employees knowledge sharing and collaboration amongst middle management, and employees.
While a traditional organizational structure can often be effective; but will cause a riff between individuals that are placed in positions of authority, Microsoft has taking care of this problem by using creativity and knowledge to escape the potential pitfalls with can accompany the use of a complete traditional structure method, that can include an over sight of checks and balances. The creativity of the organization may also be somewhat limited in this type of business structure, since the ideas all come from a relatively small number of individuals who are actually involved in the overall operation.
Modern Organizational Theory
Microsoft is an organization that is run by top down management, within a bureaucratic organization. Some of the ideals and practices of the organization will look similar to a
It is perhaps a truism that modern organizational theory has tended to objectify the way that Microsoft has managed to control their intellectual property while allowing the best and brightest people to work for their company. “Even the critical traditions in OT tend to be mired in Eurocentric assumptions, and many of the issues that affected the bureaucratic structure of the organization. Theorist simply did not figure in how technology would have affected the organizations function” (University of Phoenix, 2012, p.).
According to University of Phoenix the colony writes back: Organization (2012), In the 1990s, when organizational theorists focusing on workers and subjects they did not consider that employees would be looking for companies that would foster their ability to think outside the box, and not just concern them the experience. Theorize eloquently on how they could restore their own agency in organizational life, they found a contingent ally in Organization (University of Phoenix, 2012). The fact that in the present era, Microsoft keep on introducing new products and services to the global market.
Conclusion
Microsoft is an organization that has built itself up over the years to become the leader in the computer software business, revolutionizing the way people interacted with the personal. Microsoft has managed to what Apple, IBM, and the other computer companies failed to, and that was to make computers user friendly. Microsoft was able to do this by knowledge creation and knowledge innovation. This could not have been done without the cooperation of the employees.
While it can be a tough situation; but understanding the modern theory .According to University of Phoenix. (2016). “Although previous studies have generally established that organizational attributes matter for product innovation, a few critical issues remain. First, it is still unclear how to conceptualize organizational structure in order to allow for the simultaneous pursuit of control and flexibility. Many previous proposals just shift the problems to a different level” (University of Phoenix, 201, p 1313.). The newly-designed software and its processes are expected to provide the volunteers and employees with totally different and challenging experiences. There is a strong need to pay close attention to organizational change management. Basically, this can guarantee support and familiarity on change most especially among all stakeholders. Microsoft has managed to become the only relevant software, services, and product manufacture around the world the one thing that everyone knows is Microsoft is the best operating system around the world.

References
University of Phoenix. (2016). Organizational attributes, market growth, and production innovation. Retrieved from University of Phoenix, ORG581-Organiztional Design website.
What Is A Traditional Organizational Structure?. (2003-2016). Retrieved from http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-traditional-organizational-structure.htm
University of Phoenix. (2012). The colony writes back: Organization. Retrieved from University of Phoenix, ORG581-Organiztional Design website