Free Essay

Anarchism Essay

In: Social Issues

Submitted By FrankAHayman
Words 1954
Pages 8
Sociology Home Page |All Sociology Modules |Sociology Links |Government and Politics Home page |AS Government and Politics |A2 Government and Politics |Government and Politics Links | |

Question1

[pic]

Is Anarchism merely an extreme version of free market liberalism?

Anarchism is a fairly broad ideology and there are important divisions within anarchism as between individualist and social anarchism and also within these categories and it can be shown that whereas most individualist anarchists and in particular anarcho-capitalists have some sympathy with the principles of free market liberalism this would not apply to social anarchists in general and particularly not to anarcho-communists such as Peter Kropotkin.

Free market liberal principles have been espoused by both classical liberals and by New Right theorists who have combined support for free market liberalism with support for the strong state. Free market liberals argue that individuals are rational and therefore the best judges of their own interests and that overall economic efficiency can best be achieved by unregulated laissez faire. Liberal support for laissez faire was under-pinned by the economic theories outlined by Adam Smith in his study “The Wealth of Nations”[1776] in which he argued that the competitive capitalist economy based upon private profit and individual self-interest could via the so-called “invisible hand” of the market mechanism secure the best possible living standards for all members of society.

[Essentially the theory suggested that if large numbers of firms were in competition with each other they would try to keep their prices as low as was consistent with a reasonable level of profit for fear that if they increased prices they would lose sales to their competitors. Furthermore in the competition between firms, efficient firms which could produce most cheaply would be able to expand at the expense of higher cost firms who would be driven out of business. Consequently the economic competition between firms would mean that consumers can buy from the most efficient firms charging reasonable prices and all of this can be achieved without government intervention in the economy i.e. via laissez-faire.]

Free market liberals believe also that limited governments are necessary to guarantee social order and to provide a legal framework within which private enterprise cam work efficiently but the scope of government should be restricted so that it neither infringes upon the [negatively defined] freedom of the individual nor inhibits the freedom of the market economy via excessive regulation . Free market liberals, although not originally supporters of universal suffrage have come to accept the overall political framework of modern liberal democracy.

They recognise that the unregulated free market is likely to generate considerable economic inequalities but see these inequalities as inevitable [since they derive from individual, natural differences in talents and abilities] and desirable [because they provide the incentives necessary to promote economic growth and rising living standards for all. They do however support equality of opportunity as necessary for economic efficiency but tend to reject egalitarian arguments that high levels of economic inequality restrict individual liberty [positively defined] and the prospects for equality of opportunity

We can see some similarity between the principles of free market liberalism and individualist anarchist theories as illustrated for example in the work of Warren and Tucker. For these theorists individual freedom can best be achieved by the abolition of the state combined with a modification of the economic principles of free market liberalism.

Warren and Tucker both feared that communal living could result in the denial of individual freedom and both also supported the ownership of a limited amount of property as a means of protecting individual independence while Tucker believed also in the value of economic competition and some economic inequality which would generate incentives and allow individuals to enjoy the benefits of their own hard work. Anarchism was “consistent Manchesterism,” he said which pointed to his support for a modified form of laissez faire which could result in some economic inequality. However Warren and Tucker also wish to organise economic systems in which profit and the exploitation of labour would be abolished and good and services would be exchanged on the basis of their costs of production [primarily their labour costs].

In the schemes of Warren and Tucker the abolition of the state would inevitably mean that the scope of “free market liberalism” would increase because goods and services such as legal institutions, the police and armed forces which had been previously provided by the limited state would now be provided via the market mechanism which would now be free of all government regulation. However the abolition of the profit motive and the resultant overall reduction in economic inequality [despite the work incentives which Warren and Tucker wished to retain] could be seen as a retreat from the principles of market liberalism rather than an extreme version of them.

It might be argued that supporters of anarcho-capitalism such as Murray Rothbard and David Friedman are the anarchists which are closest to supporting an extreme version of free market liberalism. Thus whereas classical liberals traditionally argued in support of laissez faire combined with a limited state which was necessary to provide courts, police and prisons to promote internal order and to provide armies for defence against aggressors and neo-liberals argue for the extension of free market liberal principles to areas such as the provision of health, housing , education, and social security, anarcho-capitalists argue for the total abolition of the state and for the provision of all goods and services including even legal services, the police, and the armed forces via the market mechanism in which the profit motive would be retained and economic inequality would continue since anarcho-capitalists defend its importance as an incentive to encourage work, saving and investment.

According to anarcho-capitalists all government services are organised inefficiently mainly in the interests of the producers rather than the consumers of these services. Thus it is argued that professionals working in theses state services are reasonably well paid but that they do not necessarily provide a good service for their clients because they know that their clients have “nowhere else to go.” In a more competitive privately organised system services would be far better the anarcho-capitalists claim and so all would gain if the state were abolished in its entirety.

In summary anarcho-capitalists are therefore strong supporters of the abolition of the state and of the extension of private enterprise based upon the profit motive, atomistic sef-interest and economic inequality and it can be argued that it is this variant of anarchist theorising which comes closest to the acceptance of an extreme version of free market liberalism although it could also be argued that in its support for the actual abolition of the state it also departs from an important element of free market liberal ideology in which the state does have an important role to play.[We may note also that anarcho-capitalism is subject to the entire range of socialist criticisms of capitalism so that many socialist-supporting anarchists actually deny that anarcho-capitalism is a form of anarchism at all… a view which anarcho-capitalists would themselves reject.] .

As examples of social anarchist thinking we may consider the broad ideas of Bakunin and Kropotkin [Proudhon might be seen as occupying an ideological position between individualist and social anarchism and between liberalism and socialism. As such he is further from free market liberalism than Warren and Tucker but much closer than Bakunin and Kropotykin, and, indeed, Godwin.].Social anarchists would agree with free market liberals that individuals have the capacity for rational thought and that they are therefore the best judges of their own best interests. However the social anarchists argue, against free market liberals, that individual freedom should be used reflect the interests of the community as a whole rather than to reflect atomistic self- interest and that the combination of a free market economy with a liberal limited liberal democratic state, far from promoting individual liberty, will restrict individual freedom and undermine individuals, capacities for self-development through their own efforts. Social anarchist ideas are not “merely an extreme form of market liberalism.

Social liberals argue that the free market economy results in a sub-optimum allocation of resources because it is based upon production for profit rather than production for need and that that it inevitably results in economic inequality, poverty and dehumanising work which inevitably restricts the liberties and opportunities of the poor to develop their talents since the poor are denied opportunities which are available to the rich as a result of their wealth .Therefore the economic inequalities which according to free market liberals derive from mainly inherited differences in talent derive according to social anarchists from the intergenerational transmission of social class advantages .Furthermore any aspects of liberty which do exist under capitalism are atomistic, self– interested forms of liberty in which individuals use their liberties to promote their own self –interest at the expense of others.

Whereas market liberals support the limited liberal democratic state social anarchists oppose all forms of state including the liberal democratic state arguing that it uses its powers to pass laws, raise taxes and fight wars which destroy individual liberty; that it ultimately favours its own interests and the interests of the rich at the expense of the poor and that its very existence denies individuals to promote a harmonious social order via their own activities.

Instead of free market principles and the limited liberal democratic state both Bakunin and Kropotkin propose communal living involving the abolition of private property and its replacement by the communal ownership of the means of production leading to much greater economic equality which in their views will also enhance both individual liberty and equality of opportunity. It is hoped that in this situation individuals will come to equate their own self- interests with the interests of their community as a whole. Also, whereas Bakunin , in his collectivist belief that at least in the short term goods and services should be allocated according to work done, has not totally rejected free market liberal support for financial incentives, Kropotkin , as an anarcho-communist, hopes that individuals will quickly be prepared to work for the good of the community so that goods and services can be allocated according to social need which amounts to a total rejection of the economic principles of free market liberalism. We may note also that William Godwin although he is often described as an individualist anarchist also supported communal, living, communal ownership of the means of production, allocation of goods and services according to need and high levels of economic equality all of which distance him very considerably from the principles of free market liberalism.

Needs a conclusion

[Also we could buid in the following information Proudhon .How?

Proudhon argued in support of a system of “Mutualism” which Heywood describes as “a cooperative productive system geared toward need rather than profit and organised within self-governing communities” and in Political Ideology Today [2002] Ian Adams states that “Proudhon’s ideal world was a world of small independent producers- peasant farmers and craftsmen who associated and made contracts with each other freely for their mutual benefit and for whom a centralised coercive state was an unnecessary evil. We can certainly see elements of socialism in Proudhon’s rejection of large inequalities of wealth and income and of the profit motive but in his rejection of the central state and his support for self-governing communities, individual ownership of possessions and acceptance of a measure of economic inequality we can also see important links to liberal ideology.” It may be argued that his comments apply equally to the ideas of Warren and Tucker.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Emma Goldman

...You can never imagine a world without Emma Goldman. Emma Goldman died on May 14, 1940. Emma dedicated her life to the creation of a radically social order. Also, she embraced anarchism for its vision; and it offered liberty, harmony, and social justice. She had a deep commitment to absolute freedom and that led her to espouse a range of controversial causes. Goldman was a radical thinker. Forty years on she is more than emblematic, she is iconic. Emma Goldman was born in the imperial city of Russia of Kovno on June 27, 1869. Emma’s mother Taube was married to a man when she was 15 years old He later died and she was left with two children. Emma’s mother had a second marriage arranged to Abraham Goldman. First of all, when Emma was a child she constantly was abused by her stepfather when she displeased him. Emma was uncontrollable and rebellious to her stepfather “I’ll kill that brat”, he often said. (Gornick 7). Also, the family constantly moved from Konovo to Konigsberg to Petersburg. Emma’s education was very limited. Although she passed the exam to secondary school, she was denied the character reference necessary for admission. The religion teacher declared her “a terrible child who would grow into a worse woman” (Gornick 7.)When Emma became 12 years old education came to an end for her. When Emma was 16 years old her father told her it was time for her to get married and he would arrange this. She begged once more to return to school instead of getting married. Emma...

Words: 1428 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Social Movements

...Name of Student Instructor’s Name Course Title Date Social Movement Introduction The concept of participatory democracy entails direct involvement of the people in decisions concerning politics, especially those which impacts their lives. This idea underpinned the activities of most social movements between 1960s and 1970s. Its emergence was mostly characterized by establishing democracy at workplace or industries, a method regarded as useful in allowing workers to participate in decision-making. However, the concept ceased to narrow on democratizing workplace as social scientists modified it to a theory which is applicable in restoring democracy in the society (Bachrach et al. 1). The modified concept focuses on achieving egalitarian redistribution of power in the society, a process which would lead to greater effects on the agenda of democratization. Social media can be cited as one of the achievements of participatory democracy because a lot of information can be gathered and shared across the populations and countries. This article focuses on tracing the influence of participatory democracy on women liberation as well as highlighting its impact on the 21st century social media. The Influence of Participatory Democracy on Women Liberation Officially, women liberation can be traced back to 1960s and should not be confused with the women movement in United States around the same time. In fact, most social scientists regard women movement as a unique branch of women...

Words: 989 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Social Movement

...Eyes on the Prize is a documentary that follows the progression of the African American civil rights movement from 1954 to 1985. This documentary is split into two separate volumes, America’s Civil Rights Years (1954-1964) and American at the Racial Crossroads (1965-1985). The entirety of this documentary is about 14 hours long, so I only watched the first volume: America’s Civil Rights Years. This documentary provides a vast amount of personal accounts and interviews from various people who were directly and/or indirectly linked to the civil rights movement. These interviews gave the individual perspectives of the movement, which were all unique, but established similarities in the feelings of social injustices and prejudices. This documentary did a good job in showing how these individual experiences developed and united to form the civil rights movement. The first volume of Eyes on the Prize hints at the mobilization and political process perspectives mentioned in the introduction of Goodwin /Jasper textbook. The migration of blacks out of the agricultural south provided new resources and opportunities that weren’t available before. The acquisition of these resources including social networking and organizational infrastructure allowed a place to discuss the social injustices brought upon them. Some of the interviewees in the documentary made mentions of going to the churches to unionize, a luxury that wasn’t available before. During this time, World War II was looming...

Words: 293 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The New Left Movement

...The New Left and Students for Democratic Society emerged in 1960. They were a group of young, highly educated and highly motivated students. The SDSers came from very privileged and political backgrounds. They were definitely not your average teenagers. The members of SDS were very concerned with the state of the country and government. They wanted to end poverty, eradicate racial injustice and make the world a better place for everyone. When they first started out, the party was very efficient and organized. As the decade moved on, however, the party’s ideologies and political stance changed. They began to split over political beliefs, drug use and tactics. I intend to map out Doug McAdam’s political process model to determine where they went wrong and ultimately failed with their anti-Vietnam movement. The political process model states that in order to start a social movement, three things must occur. They are; structure of political opportunities, use of indigenous organizational strength and realizing cognitive liberation. The SDS started out on the same page, working to support the Civil Rights movement in the early 60’s. They published the Port Huron Statement in 1962. “They wanted a society based on participatory democracy governed by two aims; first, that individuals participate in decisions determining the quality and direction of their lives, and second, that the society be organized to encourage independence and to provide for such common participation” (Klatch...

Words: 1224 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Lee Daniel's the Butler

...LEE DANIELS' THE BUTLER (2013) The Lee Daniel’s Butler movie is about Cecil Gaines (Forest Whitaker) who has served six white American presidents until currently a black president, Barrack Obama. Gaines served as a butler for 37 years. He observed the slow process to race equality from a political perspective, campaigning for Civil Rights Movement. His son Louis (David Oyelowo) joined the civil rights movement and would dine with great people such as Martin Luther King Jnr. Gaines father and mother picked cotton on a white man’s plantation in Georgia (Nashawaty 1). Louis has been involved in a violence scandal as well as her mother Mariah Carey where she claims to have been raped by the plantation owner. The movie creates mixed reactions to the audience with various scandal represented, but essential to the society to understand racism in the 20th century. The movie is likely to create mixed reactions because it involves the whites and blacks, where whites are more favored than the blacks. Living in a race sensitive culture, 20th century, the movie’s actions are likely to draw the audience attention on race relations, especially with in a racism world. The audience may be also be enraged by Cecil Gaines inability to save his son, who has been imprisoned 16 times despite serving six presidents as a butler (Nashawaty 1). One film is unlikely to influence people significantly because most films actions are both fictional no-fictional. Additionally, characters in a movie...

Words: 646 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Modern Polotics

...Politics have come a long way from Niccolo Machiavelli in the late 1400’s to current political philosophers of the twentieth century.  Many of those great theorists had one single thing in common: they have strived to break old concepts of political thought, being it racial and gender inequality, or ideas on how to be a leader with less opposition. In modern politics, after a long period of centralized governments, the brief trend of gaining freedom and equality has been deteriorating and the creation of an illusion of freedom has slowly replaced the true freedom of speech and thought. In the times of Machievelli, governments were centralized under the power of a prince.  Machiavelli discussed how a prince should act in order to be fully respected and maintain full power. He suggested that a prince should do whatever was necessary to achieve his objectives and never rely only on ideals; additionally, no price was too high to pay for success, and a prince should focus more on being loved than feared if not possible to have both at the same time.  On the same thought, “a prince should not worry if he incurs reproach for his cruelty so long as he keeps his subjects united and loyal”, in other words, a prince should sometimes be cruel.  Moreover, Machiavelli did not believe in individual freedom.  Even the prince needed to follow rules to maintain his success and everyone else had to follow the prince’s orders and live with fear. Hobbes had a similar view of...

Words: 1687 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Eflection on: Robert F. Williams, “Black Power, ” and the Roots of the African American Freedom Struggle

...I find this article very powerful, it goes into details by informing the readers what our history teachers never really told us in class. When thinking about the civil rights movements Dr Martin Luther King’s name is the only name I think about as he is revered by all. This article showed me that contrary to popular believe the civil rights movement was not all about Dr King and nonviolence. The civil rights movement did not start from the heroes whose names we all now know, it succeed because so many ordinary people like Robert Williams were feed up of the injustice and one day decided to change their lives by fighting for what they believed in. The beginning of the article that was about Robert Williams’s child hood was very heart breaking, through that little introduction of him, I was able to understand why he did most of what he did while fighting for freedom. Robert Williams was a veteran of World War II, he is a figure that most history books have left out, and he did not preach violence but was willing to use a gun in order to defend women, children, and the community. I was a bit shocked to discover that he practiced self-defense before Malcom x Besides elevating Williams to his rightful place in civil rights history alongside Malcom X and others Timothy B Tyson's article challenges the concept that Black Power and armed self-defense emerged only after 1965. Rather, Tyson points out that the roots of Black Power stretch further back and often worked "in tandem and...

Words: 375 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Anarchy

...I could hear the tires squealing as my dad attempted to hit the brakes. What is that car doing? Does he not see our car? As quickly as sunlight finding a shadow, before we knew it, BOOM the cars collided. Thankfully, no one was hurt. Both drivers, my dad and the student, quickly got out of their cars, but the damage was done. The bumper of my dad’s car was ripped away like a butterfly’s wing from a thunder storm. The student was at fault for not signaling as he changed lanes. Luckily, it was just a minor dent on both cars. The student begged my dad not to involve the insurance company and police because he was undocumented. The student feared the idea of him being deported back to his home country. My dad whispered with his tongue, clucking his cheeks, then looked at me with mystery, and wondered how the situation would turn out if I was undocumented. He decided it would be unnecessary to make this situation larger than it really was. As a result, my dad thought it was best to brush it off, which showed compassion, solidarity, and mutual aid towards the student. The situation was dealt between him and the student without involving rulers, police or the state; a kind of higher justice was reached as a result of my father’s and the student’s decision to use mutual aid to settle each other’s fate. This example merely explains how an anarchist acts. If you ask a conservative what they would do in this situation, she would report the accident because she believes in following the laws—and...

Words: 2084 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

French Revolution

...The French Revolution began due to unrest and tension between the different social and economic classes in France. The confirmed beginning of the Revolution was on July 14, 1789, with the storming of the Bastille.("French Revolution timeline") The Revolution went on to see many bloody battles and the eventual passage of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, the execution of the King, and the formation of French First Republic. The French Revolution evokes complex emotions and perspectives depending on who is speaking about it, and it's significance on France and the entire world is undeniable. Simultaneously, the French gained freedom and experienced a dramatic revolution, while also suffering numerous human casualties. Peter Kropotkin, a Russian prince, and Simon Schama, a history professor, gave us opposing views on whether the outcomes of the French Revolution were "worth" the amount of lives lost. Kropotkin believed that the French Revolution was a major turning point for not only France but many other countries. Conversely, Schama considered the French Revolution less productive than most assume and excessively violent. Peter Kropotkin, a revolutionary Russian prince and anarchist, believed the French Revolution paved the way for expansion and democratic growth. (Kropotkin 22) One of his first arguments expressed in the text is that the French monarchy, before the Revolution, deprived the lower class citizens of food and necessities. France was experiencing...

Words: 315 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The Integration of Baseball and Its Effect on Social Movements

...The Integration of Baseball & its Effect on Social Movements The integration of baseball during 1947-1959 was a time period where barriers were broken resulting in positive social changes that would alleviate class conflicts. Social changes through integration of baseball helped the Civil Rights movements although its major impacts weren’t made until the late 1960s. Baseball players were praised within the sport of baseball; however, their social status still remained the same. What was the impact of the integration of baseball on the Civil Rights movement and the social status of African Americans? These players did great things to help change the game of baseball, but were not respected by majority of their peers. The challenges that did players had to face were ridiculous. Recognized as superstars on the field, baseball players like Jackie Robinson were looked down upon by society because of their skin color. Therefore, the effects of baseball integration on society was crucial for the Civils Rights movement, but its impact was limited at best for individual baseball players and for the collective African American society since their social status as a whole remained the same. This would lead to residual class conflicts. Even the process of baseball integration was not smooth as some teams embraced integration for various reasons such as competitive advantage or box office potential, but others such as the American League’s old guard faced public pressure to limit the integration...

Words: 993 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Feminism

...Michael Garcia Professor Ryan History 106 October 23, 2013 Feminism This presentation of how feminism has affected the world, how far its come and how much progresses we still have to go was phenomenal. Jeff Bucholtz performance and speaking fervor was unrivaled. The beginning of the seminar was started with the origin of inequality between men and women based on the thought that women’s minds worked different than a man’s. There was really the belief that women’s minds actually were biologically different and that they we incapable to do what men could do. When in reality women’s mind and men’s minds work exactly in the same way. Jeff Bucholtz demonstrated the possible way society could think by showing a picture of two apples and a orange. He then asked what is the difference between the figures. Obviously we answered those are apples and that is a orange. He then asked if they were more similar in ways than different. Then we noticed that they were; they were all fruit but just different. The same analogy could be said about men and women. Yes we are different from one another but we are more similar than different. Jeff reiterated that ever since we are children there is this constant emphasis of the difference between boys and girls. Girls need to act girly and boys need to be tough and not display emotion. With the constant emphasis between boys and girls there leads space for discrimination and competition between the two. That’s why even still today a girl in the...

Words: 1122 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

The New Left

...The New Left Movement The New Left and SDS (Students for Democratic Society) emerged in 1960. They were a group of young, highly educated and highly motivated students. The SDSers came from very privileged and political backgrounds. They were definitely not your average teenagers. The members of SDS were very concerned with the state of the country and government. They wanted to end poverty, eradicate racial injustice and make the world a better place for everyone. When they first started out, the party was very efficient and organized. As the decade moved on, however, the party’s ideologies and political stance changed. They began to split over political beliefs, drug use and tactics. McAdam’s political process model states that in order to start a social movement, three things must occur. They are; structure of political opportunities, use of indigenous organizational strength and realizing cognitive liberation. The SDS started out on the same page, working to support the Civil Rights movement in the early 60’s. They published the Port Huron Statement in 1962. “They wanted a society based on participatory democracy governed by two aims; first, that individuals participate in decisions determining the quality and direction of their lives, and second, that the society be organized to encourage independence and to provide for such common participation.” After they had published their statement and had an actual list of goals and they knew exactly what they stood for, or so...

Words: 1577 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

The Feminist Movement

...Unit 9 Final Assignment: A movement that is changing the world Shadrach Diamond Kaplan University SS 310-06 April 25, 2012 The 1960s was a decade filled with changes that had an effect on the nation and the world like none other. During this period, Civil Rights movements took place, the country was at war, a U.S. president was assassinated, and humans walked on the moon. Music and television were creating a completely different culture. For the first time a presidential election was broadcast on TV giving millions of Americans the ability see this event, and the Beatles were influencing the youth with their magical music and lyrics. The events that occurred in this decade not only touched this planet as a whole, but it also made an impression on my personal life. The city I live in saw a big change during the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. New Orleans, Louisiana, has a large black population who shared the same dream that Martin Luther King spoke about at the Capital. “On August 28, 1963, more than 250,000 people from across the nation came together in Washington, D.C. to peacefully demonstrate their support for the passage of a meaningful civil rights bill, an end to racial segregation in schools and the creation of jobs for the unemployed” (Hansan, n.d.). Martin Luther King Jr. was a pioneer for the Civil Rights movement who encouraged other people to follow him and help change the country’s laws. Because of the advancements in the Civil...

Words: 1712 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Synopsis of "A Letter to Birmingham Jail"

...Synopsis of “Letter from Birmingham Jail” By Martin Luther King, Jr. The clergymen agreed that social injustices existed but argued that the battle against racial segregation should be argued only in the courts, not in the streets. They criticized Martin Luther King, calling him an “outsider” who causes trouble in the streets of Birmingham. To this, King referred to his belief that all communities and states were interrelated. He wrote, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider…” King expressed his sorrow that the demonstrations were taking place in Birmingham but felt that the white power structure left the black community with no other choice. The clergymen also disapproved of the enormous tension created by the demonstration. In response, King stated that he and his fellow demonstrators were using nonviolent direct action in order to cause tension that would force the wider community to face the issue head on. They hoped to create tension: a nonviolent tension that is needed for growth. King responded that without nonviolent forceful direct actions, true civil rights could never be achieved. The clergymen also disapproved of the timing of the demonstration. However...

Words: 421 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Is Anarchy Good in Theory Comp210

...sought by so many is in the words of Proudhon: As for those who, after the departure of kings, still dream of consulates, of presidencies, of dictatorships, of marshalships, of admiralties, and of ambassadorships, they also will do well to retire… .The people no longer want this coin of monarchy; they understand that whatever phraseology is used, feudal system, governmental system, military system, parliamentary system, system of police, laws and tribunals, and system of exploitation, corruption, lying and poverty, are all synonymous. Opposing Viewpoint: In the article “The Return of Anarchism” Abe Greenwald speaks about the acts of multiple anarchy groups in late 2010. He describes how anarchist groups are bombing buildings and conducting crippling cyber-attacks on major companies’ websites. In this article there is a quote from the former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton denouncing these groups as terrorists “whether it comes from the right, the left, from al-Qaeda, from anarchists, whoever it is.” Some examples of the atrocities...

Words: 514 - Pages: 3