Premium Essay

Anarchy, Freedom, Liberty

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By SlauF
Words 1226
Pages 5
Anarchism, really stands for the liberation of the human mind from the dominion of religion; the liberation of the human body from the dominion of property; liberation from the shackles and restraint of government.
Emma Goldman

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION
II. FREEDOM
III. ANARCHY
IV. TOTALITARIANISM
V. FREEDOM, ANARCHY, TOTALITARIANISM
VI. CONCLUSION
VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY

INTRODUCTION
At a first glance freedom, anarchy and totalitarianism can be mistaken for three words whose meanings have nothing to do with each other. In the next pages, we will demonstrate that, on the contrary, they are very strongly connected not only in a philosophical sense, but also at a political level. In order to relate the three concepts, we must define each one of them.

FREEDOM
The word freedom implies the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action . Freedom implies no boundaries to limit human actions, so an individual can act however he wants. The concept of boundaries transforms the word freedom into the word liberty. Whereas the concept of freedom ignores the concept of obligations, the concept of liberty implies potential obligations. The word freedom ignores interactions with other humans, the word liberty acknowledges those interactions. The word liberty describes specific freedoms of action without obligations toward others , but recognizes that obligations might exist.
The concept of boundaries introduces obligations toward other people. The concept of freedom implies unrestricted movement and actions regardless of boundaries, but the concept of liberty imply restrictions on actions because of boundaries . There is another word that describes the concepts of liberty and freedom. Anarchy.

ANARCHY
The “A” word is currently used by many people to imply unlimited boundaries, chaos, and disorder. But, what exactly...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

How Did Edmund Burke Reflect On The French Revolution

...his work, the violent storming of the Bastille had occurred in July 1789, yet neither the Terror nor the execution of the French monarch had happened. This violent episode, and the apparent anarchy of the French people provoked a hostile reaction in Burke, and the positive reaction of the British people, as evidenced by Price’s sermon, concerned him (Encyclopedia Britannica, par...

Words: 1076 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Law and Freedom

...Psychology 3 FREEDOM Freedom starts with a principle of self-control, also known as self-ownership. In a free society, each and every person has legal control (or "ownership") of their own body and mind. As such, the concept of freedom refers to a certain type of political empowerment. It refers specifically to equal empowerment. In other words, a free society is one with an equal distribution of legal rights and in which each and every person has as much legal rights as possible. Because freedom entails political equality, freedom can only logically entail as much legal rights as compatible with the same legal rights in others. In a free society, any one person cannot have so many legal rights that all other people could not logically have the same amount of legal rights. For example, freedom does not include the legal right to enslave someone else because freedom includes the legal right to not be enslaved. In another example, freedom does not include the legal right to non-defensively punch other people in the face against their will because freedom includes the legal right to not be offensively punched. Basically, a free person has the legal allowance to do whatever he or she wants insofar as he or she does not offensively harm or coerce other people against those other people's wills. Remember, the limitation is a logical requirement. Freedom obviously can not include the legal right to limit other people's freedom because that would be illogical. Freedom does include......

Words: 1598 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Hiso

...but related to each other. · Government is the people who run the country. Politics is the process followed by the leaders of political groups who rule the country. Government implements the policies of the lands, such as with the judicial branch to enforce the laws, the legislative branch to create the laws, and the executive branch to perform national security duties. And politics are the tool utilized by the government. They both utilize political science which is the study of government and politics. While they both perform and aid the same basic function of running the country, politics is just the process while the government is the actual facility performing the tasks. 2. What is anarchy? Can anarchy ever a viable alternative to government, in your opinion? Why or why not? · Anarchy is living in a state of lawlessness. I believe it cannot, because humans do not function correctly without some type of structure. Without structure there will be total chaos. Murders and other unmentionable crimes will occur with no repercussions being put into place. 3. What are the three main levels of government in the U.S.? Which level is the most powerful? Which level is the most important, in your opinion? Defend your answer. · Federal is the level that runs the whole country, they have three branches: Judicial, legislative, and executive. · State is each individual’s state government, modeled after the federal government with three branches as well....

Words: 3272 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Which Right of the Declaration of Man's Rights Is the Most Important?

...Which of the Declaration of Man’s Rights Is the Most Important In the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, the most important right is regarding man’s freedom within the law because it is the main component in the development and preservation of a society. In order for society to be properly established and prosper there is a need for “rightful liberty” and the co-existence of “limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others” (Thomas Jefferson). The need for rightful liberty is important in society because it promotes people to represent themselves independently in society. The citizens are the building blocks of society, and how they go about fulfilling their desires and needs determines how the society is constructed. Their freedom permits them to do what they want, leading to them improving and building society. Although society relies on man’s freedom, it also needs an organized and written system of limitations, in order to maintain a peaceful environment devoid of turmoil and torment. These limits are formed on the rights of men, and prevent the abuse of these rights. If there were no restrictions to what people could do in society, in no time there would be anarchy. The freedom of man allows citizens to work, developing society from the building blocks. The law works to preserve society, and maintain it as a safe and productive environment. These two components of this important right support the construction of society, creating its base, and......

Words: 253 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Positive Liberty

...Promote Positive Liberty? The idea of liberty, or freedom, varies between different theorists. One theorist, Isaiah Berlin, focused on the difference between two different ways of thinking about political liberty (Cherniss & Hardy, 2010). Berlin called these two different concepts negative and positive liberty. According to Berlin, negative freedom can be defined as ‘freedom from’, that is, freedom from constraint or interference of others. In contrast, positive freedom can be defined in two ways: ‘freedom to’, that is the ability to pursue and achieve willed goals; and also as autonomy or self-rule, as opposed to the dependence on others (Cherniss & Hardy, 2010). Keeping the idea of positive liberty at the forefront, this essay will focus on what positive liberty is and whether the government should promote it. As already mentioned, positive liberty can be defined as the ‘freedom to’ (Cherniss & Hardy, 2010). Smith (2008) adds that positive liberty is “the idea of self-government”. Under positive liberty, a person may decide how they wish to live, but they may unconsciously conform to the beliefs of society, religion or their parents (Smith, 2008). Positive liberty asks the question of “Who, or what, is the source of control or interference?” (Garner et al., 2012). Positive liberty therefore emphasizes the source of control, rather than the area of control associated with negative liberty (Garner, Ferdinand & Lawsom, 2012). Positive liberty is the......

Words: 1104 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Exceptionalism

... I sure was glad I wasn’t from the Ukraine right then, I didn’t yearn for a beating from an elderly Belorussian any more than you would. But it meant more than just that. It was a history we were touching. Another elderly woman we met there was freed from a concentration camp by American soldiers during the second world war and implored us to thank a soldier at home. They admired America. So what gave so many all over the world such respect for our nation? It all started with that group of men in Philadelphia over 200 years ago. One of our founders, Jonathan Whitherspoon, recognized how different America was from the rest of the world and warned that: “A republic, once equally poised, must either preserve its virtue or lose its liberty.” (Congressional Record.) To understand what made America Exceptional I must answer two questions: What is virtue? And: Where does it come from? Virtue is literally means moral excellence. (Virtue – Definition.) Now what is moral has been perplexing and vexing philosophers and theologians for centuries. A commonly accepted understanding of morality is an absolute framework of right and wrong. Things such as murder, theft, and vandalism, are inherently immoral. But one thing that has been questioned even more is, where do we get our understanding of morality? Do we define it, or is there a supernatural God? Atheists find the question of moral origin troubling....

Words: 1239 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Anarchy

...I could hear the tires squealing as my dad attempted to hit the brakes. What is that car doing? Does he not see our car? As quickly as sunlight finding a shadow, before we knew it, BOOM the cars collided. Thankfully, no one was hurt. Both drivers, my dad and the student, quickly got out of their cars, but the damage was done. The bumper of my dad’s car was ripped away like a butterfly’s wing from a thunder storm. The student was at fault for not signaling as he changed lanes. Luckily, it was just a minor dent on both cars. The student begged my dad not to involve the insurance company and police because he was undocumented. The student feared the idea of him being deported back to his home country. My dad whispered with his tongue, clucking his cheeks, then looked at me with mystery, and wondered how the situation would turn out if I was undocumented. He decided it would be unnecessary to make this situation larger than it really was. As a result, my dad thought it was best to brush it off, which showed compassion, solidarity, and mutual aid towards the student. The situation was dealt between him and the student without involving rulers, police or the state; a kind of higher justice was reached as a result of my father’s and the student’s decision to use mutual aid to settle each other’s fate. This example merely explains how an anarchist acts. If you ask a conservative what they would do in this situation, she would report the accident because she believes in following the......

Words: 2084 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

History Thomas Jefferson

...10/9/14 Thomas Jefferson used the ideas of “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” to frame colonist’s rights. The Declaration of Independence is a document in which gave freedom and liberties to people who lived in the American colonies. Many American colonists were unhappy with the British because of how they were treating them and therefore sought for equality and rights. However, some colonists had different views toward the American independence movement. Yet, the outcome changed America forever. American colonies felt that Britain was trying to take away their rights and liberties by enforcing new laws and imposing taxes upon them. The British established the Sugar Act, which lowered the tax on molasses. Even though they lowered the tax the colonists were left furious because they didn’t want Britain to be in control of them. This Act enforced colonists not to smuggle. The colonists were angered by this because they were used to smuggling and when the British established this tax they felt that they were being forced to pay a tax which had them feeling like they were having their rights taken away. Another tax that angered the colonists was the Stamp Act. This was a tax on all printed documents and it gave the parliament permission to regulate all the trade. This led colonists to protest “no taxation without representation”. It was the concept of who is representing the colonies. They felt like they had no one representing them and that they were......

Words: 692 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Law421Week1

...The Functions and Role of Law in Business, Society, and the Military Law/421 The Functions and Role of Law in Business, Society, and the Military The functions of law in businesses and society are very particular and these roles and functions can make or break a society or business. Every business, society, and military have to make sure that they follow the laws and that each business, society, and military has a set of laws that they abide by or they could face closure or anarchy. Law in these three entities controls both how they function and the things that they can and cannot do. Society is a similar subject concerning the ways that laws are implemented and enforced. Just like in a business, society has its laws that everyone must abide by, otherwise people would be considered to be breaking the law and fines and jail time could result. In society these laws are held just as strict as they are in the business world but just because the laws seem to be different they are still there for both society and business and must be followed. Law in society sets out to make sure that the people are safe and that no one is in harm as long as everyone follows the laws. When laws are broken the person who decided to break the law will eventually go to jail/paying a fine or both for what they did and can face time away from society. Laws biggest role in society, business, and the military is to protect individuals from those who have little or no regard for the law. In......

Words: 898 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Latin America

...Latin America spent many years ruled by colonial government. After gaining their freedom they formed republics. This action led to liberal movements, reforming laws, and seeking equality &liberty. Latin America wanted to incorporate two liberalism theories by John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau. John Locke was the English version centered on securing land and liberty. Jean-Jacque Rousseau wanted unity and democracy. This attempt failed and they came to have Callidos. Callidos are charming individual who usually gain leadership with force or illegal activity. The elite caudillos were very strict in ruling. The ruled with force and felt they were superior to their people. In this regard, the people annoyed by the chaos and anarchy that had taken hold since the early decades of the independence would have stability and order. The folk caudillos were much like the democratic president here, in the US. The folk group was the smaller of the two. The people felt there leader should be one with people and act in their interest. The benefits of this group were the people felt represented and felt their traditions were guarded. Burns, B. (2008.). As seen in history the Europeans moving into America was gruesome and bloody. They brought with them diseases and alcohol disrupting the lifestyle of the already developed Indians. This led to the extermination of the natives. However, when the Europeans first came over they were more civil offering gifts in exchange for land and other...

Words: 311 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

There Can Be No Freedom Without Discipline

...There is no freedom without discipline “True freedom is impossible without a mind made free by discipline.” ― Mortimer J. Adler “There is no freedom without discipline.” - Many people disagree with this statement and tend to identify it as something bad. They identify with it as a restriction or absence of freedom. But in reality, this quote refers to the meaning that discipline defined by rules in society allows individuals to have freedom within their lives. Humans are free to do what they desire. Those who have freedom are also responsible. However, if individuals do not understand discipline nor follow it or establish any self-discipline, they may decide not to act accordingly to any rules present and break them. They will develop an intense and selfish desire for power, do whatever they can to cheat others off just for their own selfish needs, casting them aside, ruining the freedom of others, and even risking their safety. This is why freedom does not exist without discipline. Discipline is essential to living a free, protected, and safe life. According to dictionary, discipline is “training to act in accordance with rules”. An example of the absence of discipline can occur in the setting of a sports game, a ballet class, or all types of scenarios. Without discipline, a sports game will have no rules. Any of the players may choose to take advantage of the absence of rules, and can decide to cheat in order to win and ruin the fun for......

Words: 1675 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Ld Debate

...The Forensics Files - 2 – The LD File Civil Disobedience Index Topic Overview 3-7 Definitions 8-10 Affirmative Cases 11-19 Negative Cases 20-25 Affirmative Extensions 26-34 Civil disobedience worked to free India. 26 Civil disobedience overthrew the communists in Poland. 26 The tradition of civil disobedience in America goes all the way back to the founders. 26 Civil disobedience can serve to prevent situations from escalating into violence. 27 Civil Disobedience has been used to promote peace. 27 Civil disobedience was used to promote racial equality. 27 Civil disobedience is used to try to prevent the destruction of the environment. 27 Civil disobedience is effective at changing the law. 28 Legal channels can take too long. 28 Consent to obey just laws does not imply consent to obey unjust ones. 28 Distinguishing between just and unjust laws to disobey can be universalized. 28 Civil disobedience can be stabilizing to a community by spreading a shared sense of justice. 29 Sometimes it is only the unjustified response to civil disobedience that has harmful consequence. 29 Civil disobedience is traditionally non-violent. 29 Civil disobedience is a form of exercising free speech- which is essential in a democracy. 30 Civil disobedience has been used to fight slave laws 30 Civil disobedience played a role in ending the Vietnam war. 30 Civil......

Words: 18413 - Pages: 74

Free Essay

Lab Constitutional Law

...There cannot be any such thing, as absolute or uncontrolled liberty wholly freed from restraint for that would lead to anarchy and disorder. The possession and enjoyment of all rights are subject to such reasonable restrictions as may be deemed to the governing authority of the country to be essential to the safety, health peace, general order and morals of the community. What are Reasonable Restrictions? ➢ There should be proper balance Between the freedoms guaranteed under Article 19(1) and the social control permitted by clauses (2) to (6) of Article 19.It connotes that the limitation imposed on a person in the enjoyment of the right should not be arbitrary or of an excessive nature. In order to be reasonable, the restriction must have a reasonable relation to the object, which the legislation seeks to achieve, and must not go in excess of that object. Therefore, while a citizen has a fundamental right to carry on a trade or business, he has no fundamental right to insist upon the government not to make any law to regulate any business in public interest. Article 301: Freedom of trade, commerce and Intercourse: - Subject to the other provisions of this part, trade commerce and intercourse throughout the territory of India shall be free Therefore, “All obstructions or impediments, whatever shape they may take to the free flow or movement of trade or non-commercial intercourse offend Article...

Words: 566 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Capitalism

...In his book Economic Justice, Stephen Nathanson lists the first criterion necessary for a just economic system as the need for the well-being of all individuals to be maximized (18). According to Nathanson, the only way that this can be achieved is to have an economic system that is capable of fostering a market with topnotch production output. Producers and consumers only sell and buy for their own benefit and the “invisible hand” applies to the entire economy. If this quality is satisfied, then the market as a whole is improved by the participation of individuals for personal reasons, leading to the highest possible outcome of well-being within the community (19-20). According to Robert Nozick’s philosophy, this would not be an accurate way to decide on the justness of an economic system. He completely disregards the topic of well-being and does not see it applicable to the evaluation of such systems. He views that the only way to attain justice is through ‘voluntary exchanges’ that accompany the individual’s right to free will (Nathanson, 24). This is due to his historical, or procedural, theory of justice. Rather than judging whether an economic system is just by the end result – such as the well-being of citizens – he judges by the process of how individuals come to obtain their belongings (Nathanson, Blackboard). His two theories of ‘entitlement’ and ‘self-ownership’ support this claim, and they will be explained later in this paper. I disagree with this claim of......

Words: 1184 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Purge: The Film Genre

...Since the events of Anarchy, Leo has become the head of security for a controversial United States Senator, Charlie Roan (Elizabeth Mitchell). It’s an election year and Roan, who watched her family murdered in front of her as a child during the Purge, is running on a platform to put an end to the “holiday.” As a result, Roan’s opponent, Minister Edwidge Owens (Kyle Secor), who has the full backing of the New Founding Fathers – hatch a secretive plan to assassinate her on Purge...

Words: 1135 - Pages: 5