...Is animal testing necessary? As a result, we have seen many animals being tested in the space race and we might question ourselves is that necessary, well it might be because we don't want to send humans who will either live or die because of our mistakes and that’s a risk we don't want to take! But on the other hand, there are different views of how people see this occasion. Not only that, but the space station tries to make history by sending creatures to space which normally doesn't happen constantly. So, it might be new, but will we accept it and get used to it? Not to mention, sending animals to space began as a way to make sure that human astronauts could survive in space, for example, they thought sending humans first was a huge risk because of the pressure and temperature. And other causes for example in the space race website it speaks "We didn't even know if humans would be able to digest their food in space, we were concerned that humans might suffocate on the contents of their own stomachs if it all went floating up". In other words, the space station thought about the astronaut's health instead of focusing on a mission that could impact humans....
Words: 616 - Pages: 3
...Negative: Is Animal Testing Necessary For Medical Research? Conducting medical research on animals is not necessary in advancing medical technologies. It is argued that animal testing is absolutely essential for medical research, and that it provides us with many medical benefits. There have been many medical breakthroughs that have been discovered through animal testing. Some of these include, blood transfusions, insulin, anesthetics and many other lie saving discoveries (Ten). Although, it may be true that animal testing has provided many medical benefits, this does not make it essential for medical research. Animal testing is entirely inefficient and animals are not suitable models for the human body. Helen Marston, Chief Executive Officer of Humane Research Australia Inc., explains nine out of ten drugs that are proven successful in animals fail once they make it to human trials (Marston 2). The discoveries that have been made do not...
Words: 578 - Pages: 3
...Animal Testing Every single year, in the United States alone, an estimated 26 million animals are killed due to animal testing (Animal Testing, 2016). To make matters worse, most of these animals are killed after they have served their purpose. The other animals that are “lucky” enough to live are usually injured and spend the rest of their lives in captivity. Animal testing should not be permitted because animal testing usually proves futile and it is harmful to the animal subjects. One reason animal testing should be banned is because some of the substances that are tested don’t prove to be useful. Many of the substances that are tested are not accepted or even released to the public (Murnaghan, 2016). Therefore, some of the animals die...
Words: 410 - Pages: 2
...Animal Testing and Experimentation Imagine a small dog locked in a kennel for the majority of its life while being used for chemical and drug testing. Many die before they are saved by rescues. Riley is one of the lucky ones who had the chance to start a new life. At the age of three years old, Riley got to see all of the things that he never got to see as a puppy. He saw grass and the sky for the first time. He finally got to play with toys and run around with other dogs. He got a chance at a new life with a family to love him for the duration of his days ("Beagles Rescued From Labs In Bay Area, Nation After Being Used For Chemical Testing"). Animal research and animal testing is unethical and unnecessary, it needs to be prohibited or the laws surrounding it need to be stricter to protect the safety of the animals. There are many important aspects when it comes to animal testing such as alternative methods, how necessary it is to test on the animals, the similarities and differences between animals and humans, where the animals come from, and if it is inhumane....
Words: 1448 - Pages: 6
...Animal testing is defined as “the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances such as food or drugs” (“Animal Testing”). Unfortunately, some cosmetic companies treat animals unethically during testing; this brings into question whether or not the practice of animal testing can be considered ethical, or even necessary, in regards to cosmetic purposes. Those with pro-animal testing views may argue that the practice of testing cosmetics on animals is necessary for human safety, however, with modern advances in technology, there are now more options for alternatives than ever before. With support from major companies and governments, alternatives to animal testing could potentially become the standard in the near future. Those who support animal testing argue that animal testing in cosmetics is necessary to ensure that the product is safe for human use. They argue that “there is no adequate alternative to testing on a living whole-body system” (“Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing”), and this is why “animals are appropriate research subjects because . . . animals and humans are so biologically similar” (“Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing”). Humans are biologically similar to animals in...
Words: 1363 - Pages: 6
...“He who is cruel to animals becomes hard also in his dealings with men. We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals.” ― Immanuel Kant. Likewise, we can judge the amount of justice animals get in animal testing. While some believe animals should be tested on because it is necessary, most test on animals are not necessary, fail often, and are inhumane. Tests on animals are not necessary and are incorrect. First of all, most experiments are flawed; 87% of animal tests fail, causing animal lives to be sacrificed for nothing, according to procon.org. This means that people are being inconsiderate about wasted animals subjects. In the same fashion, 94% of drugs that pass animal tests fail in human clinical trials anyways. To add, there are many alternatives to animal testing, and new technology that does not require animal subjects. WIth all these failed tests, animals are dying for...
Words: 519 - Pages: 3
...Animal testing is the use of non-human animals for experimentation. There are studies that show that it is estimated that between 100 – 150 million vertebrate animals, including mice, rats, birds, fish, rabbits, guinea pigs, farm animals, dogs, cats and non-human primates, are used in animal testing worldwide. This large number does not even include the millions of vertebrates in the United States that are excluded from the Animal Welfare and thus not required to be reported. Animals are tested for the safety, and efficacy, of products to humans. In fact, both the EPA and the FDA use animal testing for the marketing of industrial chemicals, vaccines and medication. This is unethical for many reasons, most animals have a biology that is different from humans, so most animals make unreliable test subjects. Also, there are better testing ways that end with knowing how the human body will react....
Words: 1322 - Pages: 6
...humans and animals are different. Animals do not have some rights as humans because there "is no morality for them and animals do any moral wrong. Therefore it is impossible to empower the same rights to humans and animals, and animals should not be considered for the same position as humans. For example, the laws of human provide us a guarantee that every person has the right of not being hurt. If the application is also suitable to the animal, of course scientists should not be allowed to use animals in the experiments, but the laws of the animal world cannot offer that, because of the fact that wild animals prey on other animals for their food. It is conceivable that animals do not have a sense of duty like people, so they should not be equated with human beings. However, using animals for scientific experiments should not be argued. Using animals is not mistreating animals, the use of scientific research has a more meaningful and essential purpose. Secondly animal testing standards are acceptable as they are controlled by many laws and regulations. In Australia, all research and teaching that involves the use of animals must be according to the "Australian code of Practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes." Each animal testing must be assessed by an" institutional Animal Ethics Committee (AEC)". The AEC decides whether or not an experiment can be conducted, and can place provisions on the numbers of animals used. The AEC prevents animals from being...
Words: 792 - Pages: 4
...Animal Testing: A Reasonable Stance Animals can give us love and happiness when we are caring for them as pets, but what else can animals give us? Over the past century animals have also given us vaccines, drugs, and more that have kept our society healthy and safe from deadly infections, all due to animal testing. But are the welfare of animals something that should be risked to make our lives better? The issue of animal testing has caused an ongoing battle in our society that deals with both science and animal rights. There are those who favor it because it is allows for scientific progress, and there are those who oppose it because it is the ethically right thing to do. Both sides have valid arguments, which most people choose to side with one or the other. With a better understanding of each side of the issue, animal testing, we can conceive a credible truth. The complex issue of animal testing is one that should not be researched in a bias way. One must explore both and all sides of the argument to come to a valid conclusion. While I have yet to find a piece of writing that equally argues both sides of animal testing, the combined research I have done on both sides of the spectrum allows for a solid foundation for this discussion. These two stances on animal testing are opposite not only in position on the issue, but also in reasoning. The side for animal testing is reasoning on the means of science and research used to develop new medical treatment, while the side against...
Words: 2983 - Pages: 12
...Kleemeier Erica Jones ENG 105 11-22-15 Stop Animal Testing in the Medical Field Lions and tiger and bears oh my. More like, monkeys and dogs and mice oh no. How does being poked, probed, opened up, burned, shocked and tortured all for the advancement of the medical field sound? Now think about all those things being done, knowing there is another way, which causes no agony, distress or discomfort to any living creature. Animal testing is a process or “tradition” that has been around for many, many years. The problem with this tradition in particular is that although it causes much pain to innocent animals and can be avoided, many choose to still use this practice today. Animals have been used as tools in biomedical research as early on as the days when Greek philosophers, such as Aristotle, were experimenting for their next scientific breakthrough. Ibn Zuhr (Avenzoar), an Arab physician in twelfth century Moorish Spain, introduced animal testing as an experimental method for testing surgical procedures before applying them to human patients (Hajar 2011). Many research associations claim that animal testing has been used in almost every single medical breakthrough within the last one hundred years. Laws have been passed in several countries to make this practice more “humane.” In reality, these laws are the bare minimum and do not truly make a difference for the animals that are being used for experimentations. Animal testing in the medical field needs to dissolve and ultimately...
Words: 3596 - Pages: 15
...Every year over 100 million animals die due to humans testing new products, this system needs to be put to rest. Animal testing is a very harmful way to treat animals and can be viewed as animal abuse. The article, “Animal based research is still relevant and necessary” written by Swetha Murali, a writer from The Conversation, who argues that animal testing is necessary overlooks viable alternatives. No medical research should be done on animals, instead another alternative called stem cell research would greatly benefit the medical field and animals. Animals are living creatures that should not be tortured to test a product for humans. Animals feel the pain and loss of quality of life from these experiments. Humans should respect other types...
Words: 274 - Pages: 2
...wasn’t tested on animals. Animal testing is needed to help prevent deaths like this from occurring. Medicines that were not tested on animals have caused human lives to be damaged or lost. For example, in the article “Animal Testing: Lifesaving Research Vs. Animal Welfare” Lois Sepahban states,“...doctors prescribed thalidomide to people to treat colds, headaches, and nausea during pregnancy. More than 10,000 children whose pregnant mothers took it for nausea were born with birth defects, including missing arms and legs. Thalidomide had not been tested on pregnant animals first.”. This is significant because, those ten thousand children could have been born as normal human beings. But, thalidomide wasn’t tested on animals so, any side effects were unknown. That untaken action caused innocent newborns to live broken and distorted lives. Therefore, testing on animals could’ve saved thousands of children....
Words: 508 - Pages: 3
...Cheyenne Lozano Ms. Hopper EH10, R1 10 Mar. 2016 Animal Testing Many people think that animal testing is cruel and inhumane. Others think that it’s necessary in the medical field and will help advance medicine. It has helped with many medical discoveries, but it does have it’s flaws and hiccups that undermine it’s overall value. Though it still has some strong points, animal testing should be limited because animals are not suitable replacements for human drug testing, animal testing doesn’t produce accurate results, and there are many other reliable alternatives to it. Animals are not suitable replacements for human drug testing. The human body is extremely complex. Humans differ from animals anatomically, genetically, and metabolically...
Words: 784 - Pages: 4
...opposite ends of the spectrum when it comes to research through animal testing. The opinions vary and the passion runs deep. Both sides have extremely intelligent people, such as doctors and scientists, that argue vehemently for their opinion. While both sides present equally convincing arguments, there are downsides to each and a compromise must be reached. Many people, such as Dr. Andre Menache, who has campaigned against animal testing for over thirty years, would argue that animal testing is cruel and simply not worth it. According to Menache, “if we rely on animals to predict human response, we will get the right answer only 33% of the time. This figure is based on the correlation between preclinical...
Words: 628 - Pages: 3
...Animals have helped animals in many ways. One of the biggest ways they have helped us is with medical research. Animal testing has helped to save multiple lives. However, people still argue that animal research shouldn’t be legal, even though it’s the best way to get accurate andsafe cures.Scientists should use animals as test subjects on medical expierents. Many people argue that animal testing is cruel, however, this isn’t true at all, in fact, history has shown quite the opposite. Animal testing has helped save many animals from extinction, some of these species include the Black Footed-Ferret, the California Condor, and the Brazilian Tamarans. In fact, Koalas were once almost endangered due to an epidemic of a sexually transmitted disease called Chlamydia, however, due to animal testing, scientists managed to find a way to significantly slow down and treat the early stages of...
Words: 675 - Pages: 3
