...Animal Cosmetic Testing I have always been an animal lover and felt it was important for animals to have a voice. As they cannot speak, in my view because people allow the use of animals for cosmetic testing, Using animals to test cosmetic products by injecting large doses into eyes is painful and cause agony, anguish, suffering, and is a practice of animal cruelty(Thiroux&Krasemann,2014 p.352) Animals do have feelings and will cry when they are being hurt. You can see it in the way that they act. They suffer needlessly for vanity reasons and this should not be the case. In my view because people allow the use of animals for cosmetic testing, I believe that it is absolutely immoral that any kind of testing should be done as their must be another way to solve this inhumane treatment...
Words: 505 - Pages: 3
...different from a human being to a wild animal. We think, we feel, and we see, we all have a life. An animal poked, prodded, and abused is no different from a person being mishandled. Happiness and sadness are two major emotions both animal and human both experience, weather we were born in a jungle or a hospital. The Department of Agriculture has approved the importation of 37 marmosets for experiments in laboratories. We don't know precisely what's in store for these creatures but you can be sure it's likely to be something that turns your stomach. Sydney University in recent years used marmosets in experiments in which their eyes were removed for testing and the animals were put down. About 92% of experimental...
Words: 1599 - Pages: 7
...alternatives AND ethics Searched on www.bing.com Alternatives to Animal Testing, Alternatives to Animal ... The Truth About Vivisection Opinion: Teaching Science Without Harm | The Scientist . (Vivisection OR Animal Testing) ethics AND alternatives AND statistics Searched on www.hotbot.com Animal ethics: Animal experimentation - the facts - BBC Animal Testing and Ethics - Santa Clara University The Three R's: The Way Forward - Center for Alternatives to ... 11 Facts About Animal Testing | DoSomething.org | Volunteer ......
Words: 376 - Pages: 2
...you ever wondered the benefits of animal tests? Well, there aren’t many. they delay the releases of cures for many diseases, they yield defective results, and they kill/injure 1,000s of humans and animals each year. This is why I argue that they should be banned from the world. I see how an innocent bystander like yourselves would be fooled by the shroud of lies surrounding animal tests and I hope this can make you see the truth. My first reason is that these tests actually delay cures from being released, not hurry them up like they're supposed to. For instance, blood transfusions were delayed a whole 200 years by animal studies! In addition, The polio vaccine was delayed by another 40 years because of … ( big surprise) monkey tests! My last piece of evidence is...
Words: 569 - Pages: 3
...These products have to be safe for humans to use so researchers have decided that testing products on animals is the best way, but that is the worst way. Millions of animals die everyday from testing cosmetic products. In fact, testing a single ingredient for deodorant can easily cause the death of 1,400 animals (Manila Times). Scientists need to put an end to animal...
Words: 864 - Pages: 4
...is appalling that we mistreat animals who do not have a voice to speak up for themselves. We have laws that are suppose to protect animals; however, “an animal is abused and tortured every ten seconds in America” (Animal Cruelty). An Animal Bill of Rights is a better way we can enforce these laws and offer better protection for animals; it gives animals a much needed voice. Every year, more than a hundred million defenseless, innocent animals are being experimented on in merciless ways. Twenty- six million of those animals are just in the United States and 95% of those experiments are not protected by Federal Animal Welfare, one of the existing laws for animals. One of the most common and...
Words: 773 - Pages: 4
...For years, scientists have tried to use animals for experimentation and testing. Animals and humans are not the same things and animals should not have to go through the pain and suffering because we believe that it can benefit us. Humans can make their own decisions and decide if they want to try something or be used as a trial experiment, animals cannot. Animals should have their own rights and be kept away from all things that involve human testing. Strangers are someone who we have no relation to. Politically it is someone who does not share a national identity. If something was to happen is the stranger we wrong. An animal is that stranger. If we as humans work on animals forgetting the basic rights, we might not be able to coexist...
Words: 877 - Pages: 4
...Animal mistreatment must stop. Many different organizations across the country use animals to test new medications, vaccines, and company products. However, throughout these experimentations thousands of animals are being mistreated. Therefore, the organization, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) should lobby the government to make them more aware of animal testing in an effort to assist the abused animals being tested in facilities. Animal testing is a problem because many animals such as: dog, cats, mice, and many more are being harmed for the benefit of people. Animal testing has been going on for many decades, but no change has occurred. PETA can help reduce the problem by making congress aware of animal testing, so congress...
Words: 389 - Pages: 2
...Animal testing has been recognized as one of the most controversial bioethical issues within the 20th to 21st century. Bioethics can first be defined as the study of the ethical and moral implications of medical research and practice. The major issue that has risen over the last century is whether or not animals should be tested in scientific or commercial purposes. Is it ethical to perform specific experimentations on various animals, if that animal is faced with life and death situations? Some individuals in our society say yes while others say no. Animal testing has remained to be a global issue for a very long time now and people wonder if this issue will ever come to an end. Animal testing has been researched and experimented with more...
Words: 1217 - Pages: 5
...Animal Testing/Experimentation For many years, scientists have been testing new products such as shampoo, lotion, and cosmetics products on animals to test for safety. Testing these animals may involve harming the animals through excessive use of lethal chemicals which may lead to the deaths of these animals. Although animal testing may prove to be effective for proving whether a product is potentially dangerous or not, animal experimentation is an inhumane practice which is made unnecessary through the alternatives modern technology has created in replacement of animal testing. In the process of making new products, many animals undergo cruel tests for the benefits of commercial and human use. In the article “19,000 Animals Killed in Automotive Crash Tests,” “about 19,000 dogs, rabbits, pigs, ferrets, rats and mice have been killed during the last decade in automobile safety tests performed by the General Motors Corporation” (19,000 Animals Killed). This was the ironic and brutal treatment for animals in this highly technological automobile Corporation, even though there were advances of “computer models and dummies” (19,000 Animals Killed) that allowed the testers of the automobile to predict the outcomes of the injuries. Animals are also used to test cosmetics for irritation on skin. According to the article “Secret French move to block animal-testing ban,” Andrew Osborn states that “38,000 animals are used and killed in developing cosmetics in the EU every year”. The number...
Words: 889 - Pages: 4
...Should human experimentation be allowed for pharmaceutical advances? (Individual Research Report) Thesis statement Human experimentation should be allowed for pharmaceutical advances except for in these cases. Unethical experimentation including tricking people into the test, unknowingly running the experiment or forcing it on people. Why is human testing necessary? Human experimentation refers to the use of human beings as experimental subjects[1]. Although the experiments are run on laboratory animals first, the result however wouldn’t be accurate on a human being. Thus the final trial of the experiment is run on a person to see the effects of the experiment. Because of the possible outbreaks and epidemics, or in case of one breaking out,...
Words: 275 - Pages: 2
...The contents of this paper will consist of the concepts of the ratio of the benefits and risk, and defining ethics of the use of animals in research. Animal research is a topic which is ethically sound and a concerning manner to researchers of the psychological field. There are issues of tests run on the animals which are controversial in manner and a part of the (APA) American Psychological Association ethical issue. The APA is a organization for psychologists in the United States, and designs rules and guides the profession of psychologists as well as other medical personnel. The impact of the testing of animals in the research of psychology will be included in the discussion. Ethics in Psychological Research Paper Animals in Research Ethics help guide researchers around ethical dilemmas that may arise when conducting research. Example questions would be is it acceptable to avoid telling the participant of a study as to what the researcher is looking for and testing about? In what instances is it acceptable and when is it not? The development of research ethics helps guide researchers to find the necessary answer to the different question types (Shaughnessy, Zechmeister, & Zechmeister, 2009). Conducting a scientific research is when researchers look for facts, try to prove theories, and declare the findings the truth, and those conducting research must use the ethics guidelines (Shaughnessy, Zechmeister, & Zechmeister, 2009). The research study or projects could...
Words: 1175 - Pages: 5
...infection and died. This incident and others like it led the United States Congress to pass the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act of 1938. This law gave the FDA regulatory authority over cosmetic products, and companies began to test products and ingredients on animals in an effort to assure safety for consumers. The FDA “urges cosmetic manufacturers to conduct whatever tests are appropriate to establish that their cosmetics are safe”, but “does not specifically mandate animal testing for cosmetic safety.” The issue that is being raised is it ethical to harm an animal for the sake of marketing a new cosmetic product. Facts: Every year, an estimated 70 million animals are maimed or killed for cosmetic testing in the US alone, and nearly $12 billion taxpayer dollars are spent yearly on the practice. Labs that use mice, rats, birds, reptiles and amphibians are exempted from the minimal protections under the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). The AWA authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to promulgate standards and other requirements governing the humane handling, housing, care, treatment, and transportation of certain animals by dealers, research facilities, exhibitors, carriers, and intermediate handlers. The AWA defines animal to mean “any live or dead dog, cat, monkey (nonhuman...
Words: 2120 - Pages: 9
...Animal Experimentation: Unethical or Unnatural? Animal research has had a vital role in many scientific and medical advances of the past century and continues to aid our understanding of various diseases. Throughout the world, people enjoy a better quality of life because of these advances, and the subsequent development of new medicines and treatments are all made possible by animal research. However, the use of animals in scientific and medical research has been a subject of heated debate for many years. Opponents to any kind of animal research, including both extreme sides of animal-activist groups believe that animal experimentation is cruel and unnecessary, regardless of its purpose or benefit. There is no middle ground for these groups; they want the immediate and total abolition of all animal research. If they succeed, it would have enormous and severe consequences for scientific research. Animal experimentation has been practiced since ancient times, when the ancient Greeks killed and dissected animals for scientific and religious purposes. Vivisection continued throughout ancient times and into the Christian era, becoming a replacement for human dissection when the Catholic Church banned autopsies. Animals were treated as insensitive objects, mere automatons incapable of pain or emotion. By the 1800s, science and medicine were moving forward at unprecedented rates. Germs were discovered and vaccines invented; pills were created and diseases eradicated. Animals were...
Words: 1666 - Pages: 7
...INTRODUCTION The use of animals in scientific experimentation should continue to be fought against because it is morally wrong, there are alternatives to animal experimentation, and the unnecessary research it involves. The use of animals in experimentation has been a debate and a controversy for quite some time now. Many have strong opinions and views on this sensitive issue. That leads us to one question: Is it right? There are alternatives to animal experimentation, and they are addressed by some government websites. The number of animals used for experimentation tens of millions. Scientists defend animal research saying that this testing has contributed greatly to the advancement of cures for human diseases. However, in our generation, there should be a continued resolve in the fight against animal experimentation because it is morally wrong, there are now promising alternatives, and it involves a lot of unnecessary research. " The practice of animal experimentation and testing continues not because it is the most accurate or reliable means of research, but rather because of tradition, peer-pressure, and enormous promotion from those with strong vested interests." S.O.S at the University of Georgia (2012) BODY In my opinion animal testing is wrong, mainly for the moral debate of inflicting unnecessary pain to a living species, but it is also wrong for the environment. Scientists claim that testing on animals is the key to find cures for human diseases, and try to justify...
Words: 1420 - Pages: 6
