Anti Communism

In: Business and Management

Submitted By vcenales
Words 995
Pages 4
Anticommunism and McCarthyism
Victor Cenales
HIS/145
January 14, 2012
Timothy Heyburn

Anticommunism and McCarthyism
During the late 1940s and early 1950s, a struggle broke out between the Unite States and the Soviet Union in what was known as the Cold War. The west was concerned with anti-Communism becoming a part of its domestic politics. It had become an obsession of most conservative politicians to expose what they call Communist subversion and at the same time dealt a blow to the liberal causes. The interest of the Soviet Union was in the control of strategic interest. In addition the Soviet Union was determined to create a secure sphere for itself in Central and Eastern Europe as protection against possible future aggression from the West (Brinkley Ch. 29). These different views were the bases for the Cold War. Not only did the cold war have international consequences but also create a division within the United States. Since Communism was a major concern, the spread of anti-Communism was introduced as a way to protect the fundamental way Americans lived. In addition anti-Communism gave birth to McCarthyism. I will discuss the differences between anticommunism and McCarthyism, the perspective from which the media covered anticommunism and McCarthyism, how the American foreign policy decisions were affected or impacted by anticommunism and finally how Americans’ lives changed because of the Red Scare.
To gain a clear understanding of the differences between anticommunism and McCarthyism, a brief definition of Communism must be given. Communism is a distinct socio-political philosophy that is willing to use violent means to attain its goal of classless society. The capitalist system in which America operates on is defined as a social system that is based on one’s individual right to own and to become wealthy. The communist…...

Similar Documents

Communism Potentially Emancipatory

... instigate wealth distribution the idea in itself inherently proposes for a whole change in fundamental policies and changes in the existing systems ie statal to non statal .Therefore the issue of distribution is being done at root level because the whole idea of communism aims to change existing systems completely. Whilst this might be true in theory the change from statal to non statal is complicated and success is not certain. Badiou has stated that the change in system is a withering away of the state and there may be a transitional stage. It would be ideal for changes of wealth distribution to happen at the same pace with changes within the system and policy but this would not be guaranteed. The result would be that changes in distribution would occur without a solid theoretic or status quo foundation, such changes would occur within a pseudo state type of situation. How emancipatory would that be with regards to sustainability? Social aspects as well need consideration. The communist idea needs to accommodate humans for all they are and that at times means accepting them as emotional volatile entities. In Germany during Hitler’s reign and anti-Semitism there was an instance of scapegoating, the Jews were blamed for the economic turmoil present in Germany and in many ways this led to the marginalisation of a certain group in society. This example just aims to show that an objective for distribution can be very complex there is no clear cut method for its development......

Words: 2351 - Pages: 10

Communism Essay

...Communism: A Review of an Ideology Raymond Castaneda English 228: Fall Session 2012 The purpose of this essay is to explain how unsuccessful Communism is ideologically in part due to its’ economic shortcomings. For ages, mankind has been in search of a perfect society, a utopia; a society, in which no suffering exists, and everyone is happy. In writing, they are common, from the City of Atlantis to the Garden of Eden. However, there are no utopias, none for which anyone can provide proof of. For better or worse, there have been men who have attempted to bring about these utopias in the form of egalitarian societies. Some of these societies have aimed at removing the differences in social class and material wealth between people in an attempt to establish a utopian society. For example communism which was based on a Marxist utopian ideology, has proven to be ultimately a flawed principle and regime. In recent times, so called utopian societies were identified as either socialist, or communist. True communist societies have aimed to be egalitarian, and perhaps even utopian. While the effects of communist and socialist regimes are not confined to one single aspect of human life, this essay focuses on the economic effects of communism. Unfortunately, they have not succeeded in either; instead these societies have resulted in poverty, violence, and overall failure . Modern communism cannot be explained without first defining it, as there have been many historical and...

Words: 3323 - Pages: 14

Cold War and Communism

...Cold War and Communism Helen Estep HIS/135 09/13/2012 Jim Faurie Cold War and Communism The film “Duck and Cover” must have been helpful back during the war, it made it easier for people to understand how to duck and cover. I imagine it would be a difficult time to live under the threat of a nuclear war. I don’t think knowing how to duck and cover would protect from an atomic bomb. I imagine living under these conditions would bring constant worry to a person. A person would have to find ways to protect themselves, if an atomic bomb was dropped. I believe you would have to have a air tight, fire safe place to go to for protection. I believe if you were out in the open within range of the bomb, you would not survive. The impact of a nuclear bomb is tremendous; it can take down buildings and catch them on fire. Even at a distance a person is not safe, a bomb can give you skin burns up to 20 miles away. These conditions would be difficult to face, but even more is the radiation exposure this can cause a high number of deaths. I hope we never have to face the dropping of an atomic bomb. Living under the threat of terrorism is a worry in our present day. A terrorist can be anyone from anywhere. As we go through our day to day life we do not know if the stranger we passed could be a terrorist. We do not know who can be trusted, in our surroundings. There is a constant fear in our minds and since the 9-11 attack people have become more worried and less...

Words: 427 - Pages: 2

Communism

...Communism PHI 105 July 8 2013 Final Project “I find capitalism repugnant. It is filthy, it is gross, it is alienating because it causes war, hypocrisy and competition” (Fidel Castro). Communism has become a demonized and taboo word around the world,especially in Western society where it is taught that capitalism is the only correct way to govern a society. Many people condemn communism, however so fewunderstand the beliefs and concepts behind communism. It is not correct to say that communism has failed, but rather that a true communist society has never been enacted. In order to better understand communism we must first know the definition of communism. Communism is (a: a theory advocating elimination of private property b: a system in which goods are owned in common and are available to all as needed” (Merriam-Webster). Communism is also defined as “a system of government and ideals where all people are considered equal in an attempt to create a fairer society” ("Communism", n.d.). The base of the word communism is commune. A commune is a “group of people living communally sharing in the work, earnings and property” ("Communism", n.d.). In a commune there is no private property, rather the individuals living within the commune share all property and resources. Also in a commune all profits and resources are administered equally to all those who reside...

Words: 1641 - Pages: 7

Capitalism vs. Communism

...CAPITALISM VS. COMMUNISM Capitalism and communism are very different in their political and economic views. The two are economic systems that attempt to solve the social and economic problems faced by many people. They are the two most compared and contrasted of all economic systems, and are compared on many different levels. There are many social problems faced by people in many different countries around the globe some of these are poverty, crime, unemployment, war, and low education. The problem of meeting the needs of the people requires an economic system that can solve these social problems. Finding which one works the best can be an issue. A communist country would be controlled by the government, which is a command economy. A capitalist country would be controlled by the people, who elect representatives. Communism was first written about by Karl Marx and Frederick Engles. A communism, states that all people, regardless of race, gender, or occupation deserves the same rights and social placement. The community owns the resources and production of the country or area. It is said that in communist countries the profit of an enterprise is equally shared by all people, and that all means of production are controlled by the society. The society comes before any individuals in this type of economy, so individual freedoms are not focused on. Since communism is completely run by the government, the government decides the prices on all goods and the price structure of...

Words: 763 - Pages: 4

Capitalism vs. Communism

...Liberal capitalism was as well known and tried system in Great Britain during the 19th century. However, around the late 19th century a new system began to appear, communism. These two systems were quite different when it came to their political and economic views. This new system gave rise to some believing that maybe it was time for Great Britain to change their former system of liberal capitalism to one that is more communist in nature. Others believed it was better to leave the system as it was. To decide on which would be better for the country one must first look at the ideas that lay behind both liberal capitalism and communism. One had to delve into the core of both systems and discover not only the positive implications, but also the possible negative implications as well. The term liberal capitalism is one that was well known throughout Great Britain. It was a system based upon the individual. It was a system that was primarily driven by free enterprise and the existence of classes. The government had very little say in what the market was like; this was known as a free market. The primary view was that this was the best form of economic system due to the fact that the individuals themselves set the amount of production and the prices of those products. David Ricardo believed that the wages received naturally fluctuated to meet the minimum subsistence requirements for workers. As he stated, “The market price of labour is the price which is really paid for it...

Words: 1022 - Pages: 5

History: Development of Anti-Communism

... Canberra, Vladimir Petrov, as a communist spy. The stories Menzies had supported of spy rings working in Australia had began to be dismissed as just that – stories. So when the Petrov spy appeared with alleged documents containing evidence of spy rings operating in Australia, it refreshed the fear of communism in the nation. The whole affair achieved a lot of publicity, particularly when Evdokia, his wife, was forced on a plane back to the Soviet Union. A huge crowd of people tried to stop her return and she was eventually offered asylum in Australia. The people were more determined than ever, that communism was wrong. It was an aggressive force that in order to survive would need to overtake the world and destroy democracy and western capitalist society and if communism was so great, why would someone want to defect? Australia’s involvement in the Korean War, Malayan Emergency and Vietnam War are all examples of the fear of spread of communism, the domino theory and Australia’s forward defence strategy. The Korean war broke out in June 1950. Australia’s involvement was partially because of the US’s support but also because they were eager to destroy communism. Only one month after the war, so in July 1950, Australian troops were sent to South Korea’s aid. The forward defence strategy upheld Australia to act quickly and deal with communism far from Australian territory and the domino effect was the theory that once one Asian country fell to communism the others......

Words: 603 - Pages: 3

Communism

...The Red Scare The Red Scare of WWI The red scare was a national-wide anti-radical terror which was provoked by mounting apprehension, fear and imminence of Bolshevik revolution of the united state. The Red Scare was also involved in the promotion of communism and followed the Bolshevik revolution, as well. Communism is social ownership or economic system that property or resources were collectively owned by classes but not by individuals. When WWI ended, the Bolshevik revolution of Russia and the Red Scare came up due to fear of communist and socialist and took hold of the United State. There were bombings by the anarchist all over and this had put the State in fear. Democracy was not expressed, the innocent were put to jail by putting forward their views. There were no social liberty and everybody was afraid that the Bolshevik revolution could take control. During the First World War, patriotism filled the hearts of people and the state was divided into two major groups. There was a minor group which was unrecognized on governmental affairs. The first group worked in the war industry and the other in the armed forces. During this period, one had to be patriot, communist, slackers or draft dodgers; they were all classified as suspect. Out of this patriotism the Red scare took control in 1920s (Binkley 187). The McCarthyism According to Binkley, McCarthyism also known as the second Red Scare is the act of making accusations of treachery, sedition, or...

Words: 542 - Pages: 3

Anti-Communism in the United States

...Anticommunism and McCarthy A common mistake that many people, including some historians, make consists of equating a general idea, principle, or thought with the movement that forms behind that ideal. For instance, some mistake violent extremists claiming to work on the principle or idea of their religion as true representatives of that religion. However, while a movement is working to politicize or publicize an idea or belief, the movement is not necessarily equivalent to, or perhaps even relevant to, the idea that underlies the movement. Much of this is true with the frequently overlooked distinction between McCarthyism and the more general anticommunism. Properly defined, anticommunism is an ideology that holds that communism is morally and politically wrong. Regardless of whether the communist regime is legitimate or not according to the standards of Western democracy, the anti-communist believes that government is fundamentally wrong and should not exist. Because anticommunism is an ideology (that is, is based on an idea), any person regardless of country or place in government, can be an anti-communist by virtue of the fact that an anti-communist is, by definition, nothing more than a person ideologically opposed to the idea of communism. Being opposed does not specify any action on the part of the person, however. In other words, being anti-communist does not mean a person will participate in marches against communism or boo communists in public debate. Simply...

Words: 1151 - Pages: 5

Communism in the Usa

...Communism in the USA 1: Source A suggests that in the 1920s, America feared that the working class would stop working and the country would go downhill. This is shown in the source by the person representing the labour class, walking down the stairs, labelled with words like strikes, riots and murders. This is showing us that America feared what would happen to the labour class. Source A also suggests that America thinks one event will lead to another, not knowing what it will eventually end with. This is shown in the source by the words on the steps, like disorder and bolshevism, and then by the question mark at the end. 2: Source C and source B are both telling us about the problem of communism in America after the war. From these sources we can learn that people who were communist, were frowned upon by many Americans, especially the government. We can tell this because source C says ‘Hundreds of poor labouring men and women are being thrown into jails and police stations’, and in source B, it says ‘determination to drive from our midst the agents of Bolshevism.’ Both sources refer to them as criminals as source B says ‘a mass formation of the criminals of the world.’ and source C says that they are being tracked down, like criminals. We are also told by by both sources that there was a huge amount of communists. We can tell this by the fact that in source B they are referred to as a ‘mass formation’ and source C says ‘the voice of the many.’ Source C, is...

Words: 483 - Pages: 2

Communism

...Adlai E Stevenson once said, “Communism is the death of the soul. It is the organization of total conformity - in short, of tyranny - and it is committed to making tyranny universal.” The communism Stevenson is referring to does not match the communism Karl Marx wrote about in his political pamphlet, The Communist Manifesto. In Marx’s pure, communist economy, the community makes decisions. “In today's communist countries, most economic decisions are made by the government. Its leaders make all economic decisions, a system known as a command economy. The decisions are outlined in a plan that is carried out with laws, regulations and directives.” (useconomy) The communist countries in the twentieth century were not Marx’s idea of communism because the government is involved instead of the community. In an ideal world, Communism would be utopia. Everyone would work together for each other’s benefit instead of personal gain. However, the state of communism in the world in the twentieth century was very different from the utopia Marx alluded to as seen in the communist Russian government. One of the major issues with communism is that it can kill any ambition or motivation of the people in the communist country. Because individual efforts only benefit the community as a whole and there is no chance of moving up in class, communist citizens often have no motivation to work hard in their jobs. This is one of the major reasons for the economic downfall of the Soviet Union during...

Words: 857 - Pages: 4

Eastern Communism

...Brett Hulliberger Professor Daniel Huisman HS215 February 6, 2016 Eastern Communist Revolution Immediately following the revolutionary period of World War I, leaders and governments made very strong arguments for the formation of a Communist rule. This gave all the powers of unity, finance, power over citizens and their skills, and laws out of the hands of society and into that of the countries governing authorities. As a selfish ruler, who would not want that? This keeps all the decision making, punishment, and, in general, the power in your hands. A prime example of this mentality is from Li Shaoqi, “Comrades, What is the most fundamental and common duty of us Communist Party Members? As everybody knows, it is to establish Communism, to transform the present world into a Communist world.” (24.4 “How to Be a Good Communist” (1939)). Just out of a war torn repressive state the government has its stride back, and can continue to climb from a new beginning. The people, however, suffer under a communist rule. Total control of their lives, families, homesteads, and career paths. Li Shaoqi was truly a communism believer and did not hold the individual accomplishments or successes of man accountable; only “man” and a unity and how they can be of service to the society as a whole, being an integral part of a whole – and what really matters is the outcome of the “whole” not the individual contribution. The last sentence of his indoctrination tract sums up his way...

Words: 1132 - Pages: 5

Capitalism and Communism

...Genre of Capitalism Vs Communism Capitalism and Communism are two totally different economic systems. Capitalism is a much better economic system than Communism. Capitalism is an economic system characterized by freedom of the market and is the economic system where you do not have freedom because the government will make most of your decisions for you. Capitalism has many pros to go along with its economy. The government will change gradually, but is able to adjust to it with ease. Each person also has individual freedom with lack of government interference. We also have the freedom to choose what we want and when we want it. On the other hand, not everybody will have a job, and the government will not help him or her find one. If you do have a job, everyone will be getting paid the same amount of money as you do. It all depends on what you do, whom you work for, and how long you decide to work. Communism has many drastic chances at one time, but adjusting could be simple for most. The bad things about communism is that everybody has a job, but no matter how much you work or whom you work for, you will always be getting paid the same amount of money as everyone else. Another bad thing about communism is that consumers will not always get what they want because the government decides on what you sell; and what you purchase. As a Capitalist, when you go to the store to shop, you have a choice of what you want to buy. If you are communist, the government decides for you...

Words: 453 - Pages: 2

Communism

...Americans generally have a negative view towards communism. This is because communism preaches the exact opposite views on which our country was built on and what it stands for. Communism is a social, political and economic movement that establishes a common ownership of the means of production. In this society it is not like capitalism. They do not believe in the views that some people should be wealthier and have other luxuriates that others don’t. The theory was to abolish capitalist inequalities to have a working class who constitute the main producer of wealth in society. Since the communist views are complete opposite to American views, there are some key reasons why Americans are against it. For one, Americans say it goes directly against what our constitution says. Communism is all about the redistribution of wealth which we as Americans would not stand for. It also calls for a dictator to not fall apart. Marxist philosophers have also talked about gassing those who are mentally unfit or disabled and also they sometimes force sterilization to stop unneeded births of certain groups of people. In a communistic society you own nothing and you have no right to religion. This is directly taking away from the freedom of the peoples. The government controls the people, which we view as unconstitutional and unfair. All Americans should have the right to have their own views on religion and own personal luxuries as they please. Also, communism government has unlimited......

Words: 282 - Pages: 2

Anti Communism

...Anticommunism and McCarthyism Victor Cenales HIS/145 January 14, 2012 Timothy Heyburn Anticommunism and McCarthyism During the late 1940s and early 1950s, a struggle broke out between the Unite States and the Soviet Union in what was known as the Cold War. The west was concerned with anti-Communism becoming a part of its domestic politics. It had become an obsession of most conservative politicians to expose what they call Communist subversion and at the same time dealt a blow to the liberal causes. The interest of the Soviet Union was in the control of strategic interest. In addition the Soviet Union was determined to create a secure sphere for itself in Central and Eastern Europe as protection against possible future aggression from the West (Brinkley Ch. 29). These different views were the bases for the Cold War. Not only did the cold war have international consequences but also create a division within the United States. Since Communism was a major concern, the spread of anti-Communism was introduced as a way to protect the fundamental way Americans lived. In addition anti-Communism gave birth to McCarthyism. I will discuss the differences between anticommunism and McCarthyism, the perspective from which the media covered anticommunism and McCarthyism, how the American foreign policy decisions were affected or impacted by anticommunism and finally how Americans’ lives changed because of the Red Scare. To gain a clear understanding of...

Words: 995 - Pages: 4