Free Essay

Apology

In: English and Literature

Submitted By derekwu
Words 1912
Pages 8
Wu 1
Derek Wu
Professor Hyo Kim
English 212
25, February 2013
Open to Interpretation: Plato’s Apology & Sophocles’ Oedipus the King Interpretation of human reality in many eyes can be viewed in numerous, if not countless number of ways. In Plato’s Apology and Sophocles’ Oedipus the King both text are intensely concerned with how human reality seems open to interpretation, and their concerns caused a threat to be overcome in both readings. In both readings their suggested responses is similar to the concerns of the threat of open to interpretation. The Apology, written by Plato, illustrates the argument Socrates gives at his trial in Athens. Socrates is giving his defense of not in favor of believing in the gods and corrupting the youth. In making his defense, Socrates will respond to two kinds of accusations. The first one is referred to as the older or more ancient accusation and the second one is the current charge being made by Meletus, and other civilians who are currently at the trial. They accused him of being a sophist, someone that provides wisdom for a fee. Socrates advises the jurors that the statement is false; he enlightens others for the sole purpose to make everyone aware of their lack of knowledge. Socrates informs the jurors how he achieved this reputation. He claims that his childhood friend, Chaerophon, went to an Oracle of Delphi and inquired if there was someone wiser than Socrates and the oracle said “there is no man wiser” (561). Socrates couldn't accept
Wu 2 the Oracle's words since he knows for a fact that he doesn't own this wisdom. Socrates then went on a mission to decipher the paradox and to clarify the meaning of the Oracles words by interrogating others that were wise. By questioning others, this earned him a reputation of being a "busybody" and caused many people to dislike him. Socrates opening move was to call on Meletus, his main accuser, and interrogates him. Socrates does not even pretend to have an interest in identifying the source of Meletus' views. Throughout a discussion with Meletus, he explains that Meletus has not deliberated out the accusation against him. "Meletus is a wrongdoer, because he jokes in earnest, lightly involving people in a lawsuit, pretending to be zealous and concerned about things or which he never cared at all" (563). The whole time, Socrates torments Meletus, disrespects him and pushes him to reply more promptly. When their arguments arrive at their conclusion, Socrates leaves off questioning Meletus overall, and responds to his questions for himself. In his second defense, Socrates conveys that he does not possess wisdom and that makes him wise according to the Oracle at Delphi. This intended to demonstrate to the jurors that he too believes in the gods. And states god is the only one that is wise. Socrates states that, “but the fact is, gentlemen, it is likely that the god is really wise” (563). By stating this, Socrates claims he is ignorance in which he stated that he knew he knew nothing and it is god that knows everything. Socrates is aware of his lack of knowledge and tried to assist others to understand that their knowledge was only partial. He spoke with poets and asked about the meaning of their work. He found the poets were not able to transmit the meaning. Socrates stated that poets composed not by wisdom, “but by nature and because they were inspired, like the prophets and givers of
Wu 3 oracles; for these also say many fine things, but know none of the things they say” (562). Socrates also was examining a politician founded wise by others but ended up as ignorant. "They believed themselves to be the wisest of men in often things in which they were not wise" (562). Socrates journey to discover a wiser man than he made him many enemies. Socrates was able to conclude that they all considered they knew a lot but truthfully did not; this demonstrated their lack of true knowledge. Socrates was different from these people since he discovered that he did not possess true wisdom which he believed was self-knowledge. This is evident when Socrates quotes the oracle, “This one of you, O human beings, is wisest, who, like Socrates, recognizes that he is in truth of no account in respect to wisdom” (563). Despite his defense, Socrates still ended up with the death penalty. Socrates was persistently on a search for wisdom and by getting the death penalty he wasn’t upset at the juror’s decision since he believed that, “the unexamined life is not worth living for man” (574). Socrates didn’t have a whole understanding of knowledge, but if death can provide these answers by questioning Minos, Rhadamanthus, Aeacus, and other sons of God in the metaphysical realm he would die again and again (574). Socrates says he is ignorance shows deep wisdom that cannot be achieved by many. Socrates comprehends that what he knew did not have real value. From this he knows what he knows is limited and the only real knowledge knows you know nothing. Countless believe real knowledge is only facts and what the eye can see, however, Socrates suggests that knowledge is only partial and we should never stop questioning to seek truth. Wu 4
Oedipus the King, written by Sophocles, informs readers that society can be blinded to the truth. The answer that they seek may have been accessible to them yet they cannot make out the answer. Society was blinded to the truth. Oedipus was born as the son of Laius and Jocasta, the king and queen of Thebes. After Oedipus was born he had a prophecy to fulfill learned by his father Laius."It was fate that he should die a victim at the hands of his own son and marry his mother" (520). As a result, Laius binds the feet of his infant son together with a pin and orders Jocasta to kill the infant. Jocasta wasn't hesitant to do so she orders a servant to commit the act for her. The servant instead takes the baby to Mount Parnassos above the city of Thebes to die but gets rescued by a shepherd and gives him the name Oedipus. The shepherd gave Oedipus to a ruling family, King Polybus and Queen Merope of Corinth. When Oedipus grew older he learned from the Oracle at Delphi of the prophecy he had to carry out and thus fleeing Corinth. As he headed out to Thebes he encountered a man in a chariot coming the other way and both argue on who should move aside. The disagreement resulted in Oedipus killing the individual which he didn’t know at the time was King Laius. This is an example of him being blinded from the truth. As Oedipus arrived at Thebes, the city was at the mercy of the Sphinx, who killed those who could not answer its riddle. “What goes on four feet in the morning, two feet at noon, three at dusk” (500). Oedipus was the only one that knew the answer: the human being. Oedipus was rewarded the city and the queen, Jocasta. He had lived out the prophecy without even knowing he had. Wu 5 Thebes fell onto dreadful times as a plague covered the city. Oedipus learned from his brother in law, Creon that the Oracle from Delphi had told him that in order to save the city he must punish the murderer of King Laius. Oedipus calls upon the blind prophet, Teiresias, (who sees most often what Lord Apollo sees) informs Oedipus that he is the murderer of King Laius, and caused of the land’s pollution. This news bothered Oedipus as he taunts Teiresias for not knowing the truth because he is blind. As Teiresias leaves he tells Oedipus “from father and mother both, shall drive you forth out of this land, with darkness on your eyes” (513). This predicament bothered Oedipus, but Jocasta tells him not to accept as true in prophets, since they've been wrong before. She tells Oedipus about how she and King Laius had a son who was prophesied to kill Laius and sleep with her but at the end never came true. As Oedipus searched more and more, Jocasta realized that she had married her own son, and hangs herself. Soon after, Oedipus, too, realizes that he was the polluter of Thebes and that he’s been married to his mother. Oedipus then siezed a pin from Jocasta’s dress and blinds himself and is exiled from Thebes. Even though Oedipus has physical vision he was blinded from the truth and what he sees is very limited. Oedipus was blind to the truth about his own life, who his real parents were, fulfilled the prophecy without even knowing, and it was him that caused the bad times in Thebes. But as for Teiresias who is physically blind sees the whole truth. Teiresias who has limited vision saw the truth behind Oedipus, and what he will become. “The truth is what I cherish and that’s my strength” (511). Wu 6
Both Plato’s Apology, and Sophocles’ Oedipus the King interpretation to human reality can appear to be rather similar. In the Apology, Socrates was told by the Oracle that he was the wisest of them all. He knew that he doesn’t contain this wisdom. For this reason he goes around questioning others that others thought was wise to prove the oracle wrong. Instead of finding someone to prove the oracle wrong he concluded that everyone he interrogated all thought they knew but clearly they do not. This showed their lack of wisdom as they see the world as complete but in reality it is only partial. Socrates believes that true wisdom can be only achieved by the gods of the metaphysical realm. In Sophocles’ Oedipus the King, Oedipus has a prophecy he had to fulfill, murdering his father, and marrying his mother. He doesn’t believe in prophecies, uses reasons, and intelligence to live life for example solving the Sphinx riddle. When Teiresias informed the truth to Oedipus that he was the polluter of the land because of the murder of his father and marrying his mother he uses his reasoning to show that this can’t be true. The blind prophet Teiresias had the power to “see” the truth behind the causes of Oedipus’s problems. Oedipus was blinded to the truth. The answer to all his problems was in front of him the whole time. Even though Teiresias vision was limited he had another type of vision, the truth. Teiresias vision became a reality at the end of the play and resulted in Jocasta hanging herself, and Oedipus blinding himself then separates himself from the land of Thebes. In texts, Apology, and Oedipus the King are deeply concerned with how human reality seems open to interpretation. The accusers of Socrates and the protagonist Oedipus seem to believe that what they know seems to be complete. But as for Socrates and Teiresias, their limitation caused them to be the wisest of them all. Socrates limitation was he did not know the complete truth regarding the world, but understands that what we see is only partial, and that god
Wu 7 knows everything. Teiresias limitation was physical vision but had another vision, ability to seek the truth.
Sources:
The Longman Anthology World Literature. Plato. Apology. 559 – 575
The Longman Anthology World Literature. Sophocles. Oedipus the King. 500 - 540

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Socrates 'Apology'

...NO THANKSGET THE APP Apology rough draft Kwong 2 Emily Kwong Mrs. McGinity Honors English Period 3 6 September 2016 Socrates Against the World Socrates’ words during his trial were called the “Apology” which was put to paper by his student, Plato. In his discussion with the majority of the Athenian men, Socrates faces unjust judgement for speaking up for his different beliefs. Unintentionally attacking the natural philosophy, Socrates is put to trial for declaring his mind’s thoughts. Knowing that “God only is wise” (75), fuels the hatred of those who “thought himself wise, but was not really wise” (57). Socrates enlightens others that “wisdom is in truth worth nothing” (78) for the only one that has the wisdom to be...

Words: 371 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Platos Apology

...Plato’s Apology, is by far one of the most logical yet critical thinking text that I have ever read. Plato describes Socrates, the accused atheist and corrupter of youth in ancient Athens, as a true beacon of ethics and morality. The method that Plato uses to depict Socrates on trial gives us a look back on how the trial of a man who encourages one of sound mind to ask questions even to those who are deemed wise in the eyes of others. Despite facing odds that are stacked highly against him, and this being his first time in court “For I am more than seventy years of age, and this is the first time that I have ever appeared in a court of law, and I am quite a stranger to the ways of the place; and therefore I would have you regard me as if I were really a stranger”(Plato). Socrates is able to achieve what he feels is the most imperative knowledge of morality for all present in the court to understand. When we, the readers, are first presented to Socrates we find him near the end of his trial where he is allowed to speak to the court. The sure genius of Socrates is revealed to us in his first words of dialogue. Using his brilliance of moral logic and ethical thinking he warns those present in the court of the mendacity of the accusations, “How you have felt, O men of Athens, at hearing the speeches of my accusers, I cannot tell; but I know that their persuasive words almost made me forget who I was - such was the effect of them; and yet they have hardly spoken a word of truth.”(Plato)...

Words: 1228 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Plato's Apology

...I believe the argument that Socrates made: “Wicked people have a bad effect upon those with whom they are in the closest contact” is valid, because you can become like someone who you are really close to, for example if you hang out a lot with your best friend, it is more likely that you became intentionally influenced by him/her, this might be in a good or bad way it varies and depends in the person. So if you are surrounded by wicked people you probably might end up being just like them but this is not always the case, some people have a very strong mind and personality that they stick with their personality no matter what. The way I would apply this argument is by surrounding myself with people who bring the best of me and with people who encourage me to become a better person. And little by little staying away from wicked people who can affect me in the future. Even though we are in times that it is difficult to find people with good intentions we have to be very careful and choose the right people, so we won’t end up quitting our personality just for them or because of them. In another hand, I personally believe that Socrates did not intended to have a bad influence on his close companions, he actually was trying to prove a point by saying the truth. (“All I know is that I know nothing”), but most people did not like to hear what he had to say, people didn’t like to hear the fact that they were wrong and that they didn’t knew anything. That’s is why most people...

Words: 339 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Socrates The Apology

...Heath Thomas Kinkead English 1301-394 12 September 2017 Plato tells a story about a “wise” man being accused of corrupting the youth in Athens. In “The Apology,” Socrates defends himself in front of the jury while he attempts to embarrass Meletus and lessen his credibility as the prosecutor. Socrates then talks about how Athens would lose more than they would gain by exiling him, and he finishes by saying that he does not fear death for only the gods know what happens after death. Socrates uses apologia, a method of defense, to embarrass Meletus. He wants to prove to the jury that Meletus really has no affiliation with the youth of Athens, so there is no way for him to know if the youth are corrupted or not. It appears that Meletus just...

Words: 619 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Socrates In Plato's Apology

...After reading Plato’s Apology there are many questions that filled my head. Whether it was what Socrates meant when explaining his defense, or what the Athenian court members had based their moral and ethical views from. More importantly, Socrates was a philosopher, and he strived to find answers, even when they were not easy to discover. This led me to Socrates’ idea, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” Socrates was a strong advocate of this statement and supported it in front of the Oracle of Delphi and in the Athenian court. I was very interested with Socrates statement, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” When I first discovered this statement the first thought that popped in my head was how serious Socrates was. There was...

Words: 934 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Socrates Apology Analysis

...In the, “Apology, we can see dialogue on how Socrates pleads in his own self-defense. Socrates is on trial for his life because he is known as a non conformist. One important fact that must be addressed is that Socrates understood what the Athenians did not. Socrates did not believe the claim of his wisdom and was willing to disprove it. In order to do that, he decided to question three different citizens on the topic they should be knowledgeable about. Socrates also questioned the Athenians while on trial to refute the allegations brought against him. In his conversations with the Athenians, Socrates questions before and during the trial were ineffective because he was still convicted of his crime. While on trial, Socrates tells of his interactions while questioning all people of knowledge. Socrates says “where wisdom is concerned, those who...

Words: 483 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Duties In Socrates's Apology

...Socrates Duties In the Apology, it is a trail which Socrates is trying to explain his duties as a philosopher. He uses his proclaim argument of the Gadfly to explain what he trying to do for society. As a symbol of a Gadfly, Socrates states “as upon a great noble horse which was somewhat sluggish because of its size and needed to be stirred up by a kind of Gadfly (35).He imagines himself as Gadfly who is constantly trying to help society understand their negligence. From this argument he has come to understand how easily society can be corrupted. Throughout the course of his trial, Socrates become the see that the cause of the corrupted within society is due to their ignorance. Due to this negligence and ignorance within society, Socrates believes that it is his duty to better society because it is the way of his philosophical life to help society find the truth,...

Words: 581 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Socrates 'Response To Plato's Apology'

...PL 109 Study Guide Plato’s Apology, pp. 1-5 1. When Socrates is on trial he initiates his defense by comparing his manner of speaking to that of his prosecutors. He discusses his force of eloquence because his accusers use this topic to say that you should not be mislead by this. Socrates goes on to agree with them by saying he does speak with the force of eloquence but only if that is a force of truth. He compares the eloquence mainly by agreeing with the prosecutors, but getting more specific with that of what he speaks and saying that he speaks only the truth in an elegant and persuasive manner. He also goes on to compare the words spoken and informs everyone that the accusers have only spoken false things about him, and everything that they will hear from his mouth will be nothing but the truth. Socrates mainly compares the eloquence to prove his point that these people accusing him are liars and that everyone should open their minds up a it believe him because he speaks truthfully. He asks his jury to...

Words: 3636 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

The Controversy Of Socrates In Plato's Apology

...Socrates in Plato’s Apology, a controversial issue has been whether or not Socrates should be considered Man Thinking, a term coined by Emerson. On one hand, some argue that since Socrates was unable to convert his ideas to actions and become powerful, he cannot be described as Man Thinking. From this perspective, Socrates is not Man Thinking because he only thought, but was not dexterous with his hands, being too much like a scholar than Man Thinking. On the other hand, others argue that Socrates was Man Thinking because he stood by his ideas even upon punishment of death. According to this view, the fact that Socrates stood up for his ideas is action enough for him to be described as Man Thinking. In sum, the issue is whether...

Words: 1400 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Socrates 'Corruption In Plato's The Apology'

...In ‘The Apology’ written by Plato, Socrates is being accused of many things by Meletus. Socrates is being accused of corrupting the youth in general, corrupting the you intentionally and that Socrates is an atheist; in all of which he does not defend himself but rather manipulate what all the accusations against him are. In the middle of ‘The Apology’, Meletus accuses Socrates of “corrupting the youth by demonic teachings” but instead of defending himself, he starts to manipulate the accusations against him. When Meletus is accusing Socrates, Socrates says that it is impossible that he is the only one to be corrupting the youth. Socrates says “Like horses, very few are able to improve them while many can hurt or spoil them. The ability is rather limited, you will admit” – which in the end, Meletus does not care for the improvement of the youths of Athens....

Words: 460 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Plato's Apology to Socrates-Cross Examination

...Socrates, a famous Greek Philosopher, was formally charged at the Athenian courts for his philosophical teachings and its effect on the people of Athens. He was presented in front of hundreds of jury men and unsupportive audience to defend himself against charges that were set by Meletus, one of his prosecutors. Normally a person would plead with the jury to free himself from receiving harsh punishments, but Socrates was not among them. Despite of knowing the fact that the result of the trail would be death, Socrates presented a powerful speech and tactfully cross examined Meletus to prove to the audience and the jury that Meletus accused Socrates of an issue (the corruption of the youth) that Meletus himself was ignorant about. As Socrates says “But in fact Meletus, you have sufficiently displayed that you never yet gave any thought to the young. And you making your own lack of care plainly apparent, since you have cared nothing about the things for which you bring me here” (West, 25 c). First of all, Meletus accuses Socrates of corrupting the minds of the youth. When Socrates questioned to Meletus who is it that has a good influence on youth, Meletus replied the laws. Socrates then asked him to be more specific in terms of people, and Meletus said it were the jurymen. In response to Socrates persistent questions, Meletus mistakenly makes an absurd overstatement that the entire population of Athens has a positive influence on youth except for Socrates. Socrates...

Words: 661 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Examples Of Death Over Unrighteousness In Plato's Apology

...Death Over Unrighteousness In Plato’s Apology, Plato documents what occurs during Socrates’ trial, where a philosopher named Socrates was accused for being an evil-doer by simply questioning his surroundings. He defends himself in order to prove that he is innocent. But Socrates’ accusers will not accept any reason other than the one that they provided. Rather than saying that he is wrong, Socrates continues to argue for his righteousness, but then accepts that his accusers will always remain unrighteous. Socrates believes that it is better to die than to live an unrighteousness life. Rather than spending the rest of his life in a prison, Socrates does not see an issue with death, as for all he knows, it can be as equally good...

Words: 585 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Socrates Corruption Argument

...In 399 BC, a philosopher, named Socrates, is put to trial for multiple reasons. He was accused of corrupting the youth and impiety. They wanted the death penalty, but the importance of this trial were the arguments made by Socrates. One of the arguments made in The Apology that will be focused on is the corruption argument. Socrates made many arguments such as the horse trainer argument, the God argument, and also the death argument, but the argument that was most interesting was the corruption argument. The corruption argument, made by Socrates, is what set the tone and what allowed the rest of his arguments to have a place in his defense. In The Apology, by Plato, he talked about the defense that Socrates had in his trial against the...

Words: 561 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Arguments Contcerning He Impiety of Socrates

...Ke Zhan 詹可 Philosophy 120 J. Gentzler Summer 2016/5/31 Arguments of The impiety of Socrates In the “Apology” written by Plato, Socrates is charged of impiety that he teaches students not to believe in the gods in whom the city believes but in other new spiritual things (Plato, Apology,25b). Socrates argues that he is not guilty of impiety and he believes in the god. Perhaps the strongest argument that Socrates gives for this claim relies on the claim that the new spiritual things he believes are also belong to the extent of god. In this paper, I will argue that this argument fails because Socrates doesn’t have enough powerful evidences to prove that the thoughts he believes are the parts of scope that Athenian believes. In “Apology”, Melutus charges that Socrates teaches his students to believe new spirituals things. Facing to Meletus’s charges, Socrates defends himself from different aspects. Firstly, Socrates raises doubts about the Meletus’s real meaning of the charge. He corrects the accusation should be he doesn’t believe in gods at all. Let’s see how he gets the conclusion. From Melutus deposition, Socrates is charged of teaching his students to believe different spiritual thinking which didn’t admitted in Authens. Socrates argues that he doesn’t understand Meletus original thoughts. Because Meletus said that the sun is stone, and the moon earth, Sacrates indicates Meletus is antitheist. What’s more, according to Socrates’s sayings, because Meletus doesn’t believe in gods...

Words: 774 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Dialogic

...The first argumentative strategy dialogic can be defined by a conversation between people. Most of the time when someone uses the dialogic strategy, it consists of two characters. In stories, dialogic often have two characters that have a dialogue conversation. Usually, one of characters says more things than the other with two different points of views. In “Apology of Socrates”, Socrates tries to plead for his innocence and talks to Meletus. The majority of the time, Socrates tried to persuade his audience into believing what he was doing was right. There was a few times where Meletus spoke to answer a few of Socrates’ questions. Confessional is the second argumentative strategy in which someone opens up to their intentions. Confessional can be used when someone reveals their motivation for doing something. It can also be used to talk about a purpose for an action someone took. David Henry Thoreau wrote “Why I Went to the woods” to explain why he did not want to live the city. He tries to convince his readers that living life means to not live in city but to live in the wilderness. He explains his reasons why he believed that living in city was not living. Didactic can be defined as a lecture. The argumentative strategy is meant to teach an audience new lessons and new things. When teachers and professors teach their classes, they lecture and use a didactic approach to teach their students. In “Politics and the English Language,” George Orwell attempts to teach his readers...

Words: 1310 - Pages: 6