Free Essay

Assesments for Ell

In: Other Topics

Submitted By beatit25
Words 995
Pages 4
Knapp (Alignment of Standards)succeed within the classroom. Educators can assess how students are doing by giving thestudent’s a variety of assessment methods making sure to differentiate their instruction in thecontent areas of reading, writing, and listening and speaking so that the diverse needs of everylearner is meet. Overall, the simplest way to look view this whole idea is to remember thestandards-based instruction begins by identifying the relevant standards and planning instruction,then deliver the instructions and finally evaluate whether the instruction has been masteredaccording to the standards (Hinkel, 2005).Along with the comprehensive ELP Standards that Oregon has developed it has also provided detailed proficiency levels. These grade-by-grade standards were developed to helpteachers move LEP students to full fluency in English and to proficiency on the Oregon English-Language Arts (ELA) Standards (ODE, 2011). The state of Oregon has implemented thisrefinement because they believe that it is needed so teachers can better assess the progress of their students. The proficiency levels addressed are levels 1-5. A student at level one isconsidered beginning and just starting out with English, while a level 5 is a student who isconsidered advanced and is ready to be exited from the ELL program. What I like about thisleveling system is that it gives the teachers an idea of where to start differentiating a student’sinstruction of curriculum. LEP students working at the Advanced proficiency level on the ELPStandards are to demonstrate proficiency on all standards detailed in levels 1-5 along with allOregon ELA standards for the grades in which they are enrolled (ODE, 2011). LEP studentsworking at the Intermediate proficiency level of these ELP Standards should demonstrate proficiency on the ELP standards for all prior grades (ODE, 2011).Another source that can be used as a tool to drive the standards-based instruction is theEnglish Language Proficiency Assessment (ELPA) that the state of Oregon gives to its ELLs onan annual basis. This assessment is great in that it is useful for determining which content area4

Knapp (Alignment of Standards)standards are in greater need of attention. The ELPA assessment assess in the content areas of math, reading and literature, science, social studies, and writing. From the ELPA assessmentscores it can be determined whether an ELLs is deficient in their English skills in each of thecontent areas in which he or she scores low. This will give an educator a heads up in whichstandards the student needs to have more of an intensified instruction within.Teachers get a variety of helpful teaching strategies that can be used to help them better plan their lessons and instruction so that they can provide not only high expectations and themotivation needed to tailor instruction to meet the needs of their diverse learners, but these newstrategies will also give the educator the confidence needed to be successful themselves ingetting those students to meet those standards. The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol(SIOP) Model was developed to facilitate high quality instruction for ELLs in content areateaching (SIOP Institute, 2008). It is used in hundreds of schools across the U.S. as well as inseveral other countries. The new push in Oregon is to get teachers the training needed in order to provide those high expectations and instruction needed so that their diverse learners can meetthose standards. To do this Oregon has been offering Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol(SIOP) professional development classes to better prepare educators for today’s demands of teaching ELLs. SIOP is great in that it is not another program that needs to be implemented or learned, but rather it is just a “tool box” full of ideas to better support ELLs in a classroom.In conclusion, although high stakes testing carries much weight, for educators there are possibilities to meet federal and state regulations by cautiously and consciously planning lessonsthat provide students with multiple opportunities to be successful and apply language in contentcontext (GCU, 2011). In order to do this educators need to become better prepared at instructingand aligning their state’s standards with the ELP standards within their lessons so that allstudents are given a chance to succeed and apply their language skills to the subject matter at5

Knapp (Alignment of Standards)hand or be learned. The more opportunities a teacher provides his or her students, the morelikely they will experience success and be successful in their future endeavors in life.ReferencesArizona Department of Education (ADE). (2007). Retrieved May 10, 2011 from, 6

Knapp (Alignment of Standards)Grand Canyon University. (2011). English Language Teaching Methods. Module four lecturenotes. Retrieved May 11, 2011, from, E. (2005). Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning:Routledge, 2005. Retrieved May 11, 2011 from, Department of Education (ODE). (2010). Retrieved May 11, 2011, from page=3&TopicRelationID=1696&ContentID=72&Content=88482Oregon Department of Education (ODE). (2011). Retrieved May 2, 2011, from Department of Education (ODE). (2011). Retrieved May 11, 2011 from, SIOP Institute. (2008). Retrieved May 9, 2011 from,

of 7

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment.


Characters: 400.


Module 4 Alignment of Standards

Download or Print

681 Reads

Info and Rating

Uploaded by

Shane Knapp




TIP Press Ctrl-F to quickly search anywhere in the document.

More from This User

Related Documents

7 p.

Module 4 Alignment of Standards.

9 p.

Module 1 SS Standards.










Follow Us! About
Scribd 101
Web Stuff
Developers / API

Copyright © 2012 Scribd Inc.




Similar Documents

Free Essay

National Integration and Tolerance

...National Integration and Tolerance in Georgia Introduction About this report This report draws on the results of a sociological survey, desk research, media monitoring and focus group meetings conducted in Georgia in 2006. It provides a review of the legislative framework governing the protection of persons belonging to national minorities in Georgia. It also analyses public perceptions that affect the life of these persons in Georgia as a whole and more specifically in areas where persons belonging to national minorities live in large numbers. The report was prepared in the framework of the National Integration and Tolerance in Georgia Program (NITG) by the research group of the implementing agency – the United Nations Association of Georgia (UNAG), Institute of Social Researchers (ISR) and BCG Research sociological agencies and was supported through consultation and training by the Freedom House. Purpose and Context of the Report NITG program is supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The overall goal of the program is to elaborate a National Integration Strategy and Action Plan (NISAP) on national minorities through participatory approach, to ensure legitimacy, sustainability and sense of ownership towards the document among key stakeholders. Through this process, Georgia will test innovative policies and contribute to the development of best practices as a part of a legally compliant strategy document. The project also aims to build...

Words: 43671 - Pages: 175

Premium Essay

Business Management

...SAGE India website gets a makeover! Global Products Enhanced Succinct Intuitive THE Improved Interactive Smart Layout User-friendly Easy Eye-catching LEADING WORld’s LEADING Independent Professional Stay tuned in to upcoming Events and Conferences Search Navigation Feature-rich Get to know our Authors and Editors Why Publish with SAGE ? World’s LEADING Publisher and home and editors Societies authors Professional Academic LEADING Publisher Natural World’s Societies THE and LEADING Publisher Natural authors Societies Independent home editors THE Professional Natural Societies Independent authors Societies and Societies editors THE LEADING home editors Natural editors Professional Independent Academic and authors Academic Independent Publisher Academic Societies and authors Academic THE World’s THE editors Academic THE Natural LEADING THE Natural LEADING home Natural authors Natural editors authors home World’s authors THE editors authors LEADING Publisher World’s LEADING authors World’s Natural Academic editors World’s home Natural and Independent authors World’s Publisher authors World’s home Natural home LEADING Academic Academic LEADING editors Natural and Publisher editors World’s authors home Academic Professional authors Independent home LEADING Academic World’s and authors home and Academic Professionalauthors World’s editors THE LEADING Publisher authors Independent home editors Natural...

Words: 63606 - Pages: 255

Premium Essay

The Advent of Social Progress Index to Measure Competitiveness

...Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress Professor Joseph E. STIGLITZ, Chair, Columbia University Professor Amartya SEN, Chair Adviser, Harvard University Professor Jean-Paul FITOUSSI, Coordinator of the Commission, IEP Other Members Bina AGARWAL Kenneth J. ARROW Anthony B. ATKINSON François BOURGUIGNON Jean-Philippe COTIS Angus S. DEATON Kemal DERVIS Marc FLEURBAEY Nancy FOLBRE Jean GADREY Enrico GIOVANNINI Roger GUESNERIE James J. HECKMAN Geoffrey HEAL Claude HENRY Daniel KAHNEMAN Alan B. KRUEGER Andrew J. OSWALD Robert D. PUTNAM Nick STERN Cass SUNSTEIN Philippe WEIL University of Delhi StanfordUniversity Warden of Nuffield College School of Economics, Insee, Princeton University UNPD Université Paris 5 University of Massachussets Université Lille OECD Collège de France Chicago University Columbia University Sciences-Po/Columbia University Princeton University Princeton University University of Warwick Harvard University London School of Economics University of Chicago Sciences Po Rapporteurs Jean-Etienne CHAPRON General Rapporteur Didier BLANCHET Jacques LE CACHEUX Marco MIRA D’ERCOLE Pierre-Alain PIONNIER Laurence RIOUX Paul SCHREYER Xavier TIMBEAU Vincent MARCUS INSEE INSEE OFCE OCDE INSEE INSEE/CREST OCDE OFCE INSEE Table of contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. SHORT NARRATIVE ON THE CONTENT OF THE REPORT Chapter 1: Classical GDP Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....

Words: 147885 - Pages: 592