Free Essay

Assisted Suicide

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By lilangel39345
Words 2871
Pages 12
Assisted Suicide Teresa Grass
PHI200: Mind and Machine
Instructor: David Tredinnick
June 25, 2012

My point of view on assisted suicide I believe it a sin. In the Holy Bible the “Ten Commandments” it is written “thou shalt not kill.” I stand on the concept that dismissing a person life before it’s his/her time is truly not right. I believe that no matter whom you or what position you may hold doesn’t give you the right to play God. Due to the obvious extent of self-interest that an individual have in their own personal choices; in this day in our culture people as usual try to seek out assured circumstances in such an upright and surprising ways. It was once said that for the ones that are extremely disabled this type of reaction bring forth a common sense of expectation. I do believe that this not right at all because even when a person is suffering under countless circumstances, they desire for this person to go through life-threating operations along with the pain and suffering. It should be that person owns choice for Euthanasia but only during those cases that are so extreme. Suicide has become a vital part of our everyday lives, but through assisted suicide from doctors we have the aptitude to keep suicide to a lessor level to the families that are involved.
Assisted suicide is wrong. It is stated in the Ten Commandments “thou shalt not kill”, so with this said I believe that Assisted Suicide is definitely wrong. Many may say that the bible is wrong and that we shouldn’t believe in the holy bible; but I do beg the difference, as many scientist have tried to prove that God doesn’t exist they have to come to the conclusion that it has to be a higher power. It is Biblical wrong. I will give you some quotes out of the bible to coincide with my belief. In Ecclesiastes 8:8, “There is no man that hath power over the spirit to retain the spirit; neither hath he power in the day of death: and there is no discharge in that war; neither shall wickedness deliver those that are given to it.” In James 2:26, “For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.”The Lord even sees when a sparrow falls (Matthew 10:29). Although animals do not have a soul they do have spirits (Ecclesiastes 3:21). I believe the government has the given authority by God to take a person life for the reason of Capital Punishment. Throughout the bible there it is not written that physicians have any authority by God to take a person life. Like I have mentioned above the only one has the given right is the government for capital punishment but all other individuals are given the commandment. “Thou shalt not kill,” Exodus 20:13 and “Thou shalt do no murder,” Matthew 19:18. As we have seen, the taking of the spirit from the body is something done by God in His time. This is God’s business, not ours or physicians. I believe it a sign that there are needs that are not being attended to for a patients’ request for suicide. One of the matters that individuals have to deal with is to make the choice do they want the one that they cherish so closely to suffer or take care of the ill individual by themselves for the period in this society when those individuals are opposed with the possibly of assisted suicide. I would definitely weigh out my options before I even think about assisted suicide. I believe that assisted suicide I just wicked. It is just plain murder for any kind of assisted suicide. For the people after they are dead, have gone through assisted suicide, there are some findings afterwards that their illness was misdiagnosed or they could have been cured.A miracle could occur, or a misdiagnosis could happen. Maybe, if we were to keep this in mind infers that we ought to be exceptionally aware not that we ought to react under any given situations. We got to do everything that is in our might to prolong life as long as we can in case there could be a startling recovery or a misdiagnosis. Even though, we wouldn’t ever refuse or not allow any treatment when the situation might be disheartened if this is the case rushed death shouldn’t be taken so lightly. Suffering is in God’s plan ending life to dismiss suffering is interfering with God’s plan. It has been made clear that all suffering is comes from God to serve as a purpose we shouldn’t never interfere with the acts of God. By allowing assisted suicide it is a less expensive way for the selected one to get out taking care of the destitute. Assisted Suicide is right. An individual ought to have the right to die with personal self-respect. It’s a known fact that the legislation has legalized assisted suicide with the claim that it’s the moral rights of every individual to have a free choice whatever they decide to do with his/her life with the exception that they don’t cause any harm to others. If an individual’s deciding to end their life they have the right to. There are several of people who want to die, since such people whose handicap, condition, disease could stop them from being unable to end their lives in an honorable way. If individuals were to request for assistance in exercising their right to die, his/ her wishes need to be valued. I can relate to story about Susan Wolf my family and I had to deal with the same situation.“I want to stop” those words that was spoken was the identical words that my father had spoken to my family and I, he was also tired of going through numerous of surgeries and suffering. We didn’t want to hear those words because it was extremely hard for us to even think about bearing those words. We wanted him to stay on this earth with us for a little while longer but he just wasn’t going through another cancer surgery he was ready to go be with the Lord. I can relate to her having to see her father lay in that bed and continue to sulfur, but we decided along with him not to operate but to let the tumor in his brain to take its course and eventually would take him out.it an individual own personal nature for the right to diethe right to die should be a personal and private decisionit should be left up to that person choosing to have the right to die whether it’s pain and suffering that can’t be controlled or terminal.

There should be no interference from the Government since it should be a right of that individual to decide the government is not affected in anyway."I want the legal right to die peacefully, at the time of my own choosing, in the embrace of my family and friends." Those are the words of Gloria Taylor, the 64 year old woman at the centre of a landmark B.C. Supreme Court ruling that strikes down Canada's prohibition against physician-assisted suicide (PAS). What's ironic about Taylor's statement is her legal victory extends this right to everyone, evidence shows that the right of many others to continue living will be jeopardized. That is the unintended consequence behind euthanasia and PAS: Some people get the right to choose how and when to die and others don't have the right to choose anything ever again because they may be killed against their will. That's what the evidence, stemming from years of PAS, shows in countries like the Netherlands and Belgium. “ (LiciaCorbella. (2012, June 23). The slippery slope of euthanasia.Calgary Herald,A.14. Retrieved June 26, 2012, from Canadian Newsstand Complete.) “On June 15, Justice Lynn Smith ruled that the prohibition against PAS violates two sections of the Charter - the right to equality and the right to life, liberty and the security of the person.Because Taylor suffers from ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease, Smith ruled that Taylor's right to equality is violated since her disability would make it impossible for her to kill herself, which is the right of every other able bodied Canadian. Smith has given Parliament one year to rewrite the law, however, it's more likely her decision will be appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada In her 286-page ruling, Smith refers to many comprehensive reports from the Netherlands and Belgium that clearly demonstrate that thousands of people have been killed without their consent by physicians, and yet she accepts the conclusion of pro-euthanasia experts that there is little evidence of a "slippery slope" or danger to society by turning the tables on the age-old rule against the premeditated killing of another human being.Alex Schadenberg, executive director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition - an intervener in this case - points out that simply quoting pro-euthanasia proponents claiming that a slippery slope doesn't exist doesn't mean it's true. When physician-assisted suicide became a common practice in Holland about 30 years ago, the guidelines were that only terminally ill elderly people in excruciating pain who were not depressed and repeatedly asked for it would be eligible for euthanasia.”(LiciaCorbella. (2012, June 23). The slippery slope of euthanasia.Calgary Herald,A.14. Retrieved June 26, 2012, from Canadian Newsstand Complete.) There are two different types of assisted suicide, Physicians-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia. Physicians-Assisted Suicide it is when it asks from the patient of the doctor to give them drugs to end or shorten their life with the assistance of a doctor. Of course, Physician-Assisted Suicide is not a new phenomenon. People have always been suffering since the beginning of time. Asking for permission to end suffering by the way of death through both euthanasia and physician –assisted suicide have been happening since medicine beginning. “Most physicians receive a requestBased on a recent study, 57% of physicians practicing today have received a request for physician-assisted suicide in some form or another. Many alternatives to Physician-Assisted Suicide exist while unrelieved physical suffering may have been greater in the past, modern medicine now has more knowledge and skills to relieve suffering than ever before. Today, specialists in palliative care believe that if all patients had access to careful assessment and optimal symptom control and supportive care, the suffering of most patients with life-threatening illnesses could be reduced sufficiently to eliminate their desire for hastened death. Even when the desire persists, avenues other than physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia are available to remedy suffering and avoid prolonging life against the patient’s wish.”*(The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (1999).Physician – Assisted Suicide Debate, Retrieved from www.endlink.lurie.northwestern.edu) “The debate about the legalization of active steps to intentionally end life as a means to end suffering remains controversial. Modern history suggests that the topic comes up for intense attention periodically. Because of the added risk of misunderstanding or overriding the patient’s wishes, there is currently less support for euthanasia than for physician-assisted suicide. Nonetheless, both requests do occur and physicians need to know how to respond to either type of request. As the current debate unfolds, there are 2 principles on which all of organized medicine agrees:Physicians have an obligation to relieve pain and suffering and to promote the dignity of dying patients in their carethe principle of patient bodily integrity requires that physicians must respect patients’ competent decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment. .” (The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (1999).Physician – Assisted Suicide Debate, Retrieved from www.endlink.lurie.northwestern.edu ) “An important event in the present debate occurred in 1997, when the US Supreme Court: Recognized no federal constitutional right to physician-assisted suicideAffirmed that state legislatures may choose to legalize itAs of early 1999, Oregon is the only state that has voted to legalize PAS. In contrast to the PAS debate, the right to palliative care is uniformly acknowledged. The same US Supreme Court Justices’ concurring opinions supported the right of all Americans to receive quality palliative careAn important event in the present debate occurred in 1997, when the US Supreme Court: Recognized no federal constitutional right to physician-assisted suicideAffirmed that state legislatures may choose to legalize itAs of early 1999, Oregon is the only state that has voted to legalize PAS. In contrast to the PAS debate, the right to palliative care is uniformly acknowledged. The same US Supreme Court Justices’ concurring opinions supported the right of all Americans to receive quality palliative care.” (The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (1999).Physician – Assisted Suicide Debate, Retrieved from www.endlink.lurie.northwestern.edu )Due to the intervening of the patients’ commands, now there is lessor support for euthanasia than for physician-assisted suicide due to the risk of misunderstanding. Regardless, the both of them do happen and the doctors need to have the knowledge of how to handle either one of them. (Lurie, 2004) “Euthanasia:the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit.Removal of life-sustaining medical treatment from a person at their request, under this definition, the death of the person is not wanted but pain-relief or suffering-relief actions are taken that indirectly likely cause the death of the personSome people confuse the issue by using both meanings of passive euthanasia when in reality they are totally different. Some bring up the case of a person who doesn't want to be forced to remain alive by being hooked up to medical equipment. However, the law already permits a patient or their surrogates to choose to stop such treatments.” ((2002) Definitions on Euthanasia, Retrieved from www. catholiceducation.org) Euthanasia is so called mercy killings.Family members, nurses, doctors are the ones who used this type method to hurry death by giving the patients overly above the top dosages of narcotics, antidepressant, sedatives. Narcotics that are administered improperly over the top dosage may cause death when the patient is not in pain or just don’t need the narcotics. If a member of your family is not sure they need to ask questions and have the knowledge of how much of any why the medications are being given to the patient. “Morphine is commonly given for severe pain in terminal illnesses, especially in cancer pain. In the case of severe pain, extremely high doses of morphine or other narcotics may be necessary to control that pain and have been determined to be safe to administer under the careful supervision of the physician and hospice staff. Morphine is also given for other reasons which most family members may not understand. For example, in the case of end-stage heart failure with respiratory congestion resulting from the weakened heart action, fluid from the blood percolates out through the capillaries in the lung, causing severe respiratory congestion and distress. Medical textbooks list morphine given in combination with a diuretic like Lasix (furosemide) as a classic and one of the most effective ways of reducing respiratory distress and congestion caused by such heart failure.” (Panzer,Ron ( January 2000) Questionable Death, Assisted Suicide,Mercy Killing (& Involuntary EuthanasiaRetrieved from www. www.hospicepatients.org)
My point of view on assisted suicide I believe it a sin. In the Holy Bible the “Ten Commandments” it is written “thou shalt not kill.” I stand on the concept that dismissing a person life before it’s his/her time is truly not right. I believe that no matter whom you or what position you may hold doesn’t give you the right to play God. Due to the obvious extent of self-interest that an individual have in their own personal choices; in this day in our culture people as usual try to seek out assured circumstances in such an upright and surprising ways. It was once said that for the ones that are extremely disabled this type of reaction bring forth a common sense of expectation. I do believe that this not right at all because even when a person is suffering under countless circumstances, they desire for this person to go through life-threating operations along with the pain and suffering. It should be that person owns choice for Euthanasia but only during those cases that are so extreme. Suicide has become a vital part of our everyday lives, but through assisted suicide from doctors we have the aptitude to keep suicide to a lessor level to the families that are involved.

References:
(2002) Definitions on Euthanasia, Retrieved from www. catholiceducation.org
LiciaCorbella. (2012, June 23). The slippery slope of euthanasia.Calgary Herald,A.14. Retrieved June 26, 2012, from Canadian Newsstand Complete.
Lurie, R.H.L. (2004, March 25). Back to module 5: physician-assistedsuicidedebate.Retrievedfromhttp://endoflife.northwestern.edu/physician_assisted_suicide_debate/what.cfm
Panzer,Ron ( January 2000) Questionable Death, Assisted Suicide, Mercy Killing (& Involuntary Euthanasia Retrieved from www. www.hospicepatients.org
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (1999).Physician – Assisted Suicide Debate, Retrieved from www.endlink.lurie.northwestern.edu

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Assisted Suicide

...Assisted Suicide Letithia Terry PHI103: Informal Logic Kurt Mosser June 6, 2011 Assisted Suicide Assisted Suicide is when the physician provides the necessary means or information and the patient performs the act. Euthanasia is where the physician performs the intervention defined as the “act of bringing about the death of a hopelessly ill and suffering person in a relatively quick and painless way for reason of mercy (as cited in Mosser 2010). Physician Assisted Suicide has grown to be a controversial issue and one of the major disputes is; can an incurable ill patient be able to choose Physician assisted suicide? This phenomenal dilemma has risen debates on rather to legalize PAS or keep it illegal because of the different issues concerning the different religion, moral and ethical views people have on the topic. In this essay I will discuss issues of why many people and I believe assisted suicide should be legalized. There are different laws around the world concerning physician assisted suicide and only a few states that has legalized the procedure. In 2005, there were only four places in the world that open and legally authorize assistance in dying patients: “Oregon (since l997, physician-assisted suicide only); Switzerland (1941, physician and non-physician assisted suicide only); Belgium (2002, permits 'euthanasia' but does not define the method and the Netherlands (voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide...

Words: 1850 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Assisted Suicide

...Assisted Suicide Cornelia Fuller Mind and Machine Frank Morelli January 28th, 2012 Assisted suicide or euthanasia is a difficult way to leave this earth. If I were in Wolf’s place I think I would respond in a relativist way. I would try to see these actions from the father’s point of view. I agree with Wolf’s decision in the end, her father lived a full life and did not want to die a slow painful, torturing death. If I were ever put in the position to give advice or even assist with a suicide or euthanasia, I would weigh the outcome for the family member or friend that I am acting for. If this person were as bad off as Wolf’s father, yes I would do everything in my power to help them stay comfortable. I would want them to live long and I would probably be a bit selfish about the decision at first. If I knew it was what my loved one wished for, I think I would do anything in my power to help them get their “dying” wish. If a person is in that bad of shape and cannot eat on their own or perform most daily task, isn’t it almost like being comatose? If the life will never have any real value and they will end up in pain for the rest of their time on earth, isn’t that the same as being cruel to animals and making them suffer? Why would any loved one want to see someone they love suffer through any more pain than they have to? If the quality of life has been diminished and the real ability to do almost anything is gone, would you want to be kept alive in pain? In...

Words: 922 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Assisted Suicide

...Assisted Suicide By: Tim Winn Phi200: Mind and Machine Instructor: Peggy Allen 3-18-12 Assisted suicide is a dilemma that has plagued us as moral beings for a long time. Though this issue has always been debated, I think recent technology should make us take another look at the use of assisted suicide. Developments in the past couple of decades, has improved our quality of life dramatically. People are living longer and healthier lives. Today’s doctors can even keep individuals alive when it is past their means to live. Should it be ok to keep someone living even when their quality of life is not one they no longer wish to live? Shouldn’t the individual hold that right? If they are unable to make that decision for themselves, who should hold the right to make the decision for them? Even though there will always be different circumsatnces I think that the individual should have the right to make that decision, and if they are not in the right mind they should be able to impower someone else to carry out their wishes. Susan Wolf wrote about her father’s death and the thoughts that she had along the way. I could not imagine having to make a decision like this if I were in her shoes. I know that I said I think that the individual should have the right make their own decision, but being put in charge of the fate of your own father would be a tough one. I think that caught up in the moment she wanted what all of us want. I would want my father to live and I would not want...

Words: 508 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Assisted Suicide

...Assisted suicide Assisted suicide generally refers to a practice in which the physician provides a patient with a lethal dose of medication, upon the patient's request, which the patient intends to use to end his or her own life (Somerville 47). Assisted suicide has been a highly controversial issue nowadays. In some countries it is legalized. Some people hold the opinion that assisted suicide is not considerable due to the fact that life is valuable than any substances, but I think assisted suicide should be legalized and put into practice because it will benefits all people involved. In the next paragraphs, I will talk about what are the advantages about assisted suicide. First, assisted suicide can release the pain of the dying patient who suffers terribly from the incurable disease. The most well-known method of assisted suicide is Euthanasia. The word “Euthanasia” comes from Greek words, means dying with happiness. In China, Euthanasia means, when the incurable patient nearly dying, suffering with extremely pain for both spiritual and physical, if the patient and his or her families ask for Euthanasia and the doctors allowed, the patient could get Euthanasia in a humanistic way. So we can safely conclude that Euthanasia or assisted suicide is not killing people, but helping them getting rid of the intolerable suffering. Second, assisted suicide will also reduce the great financial pressure for the families on living, because a great deal of money......

Words: 897 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Assisted Suicide

...Assisted Suicide Shanette Anfield PHI200: Mind and Machine Troy Epps July 31, 2012 Assisted Suicide Assisted suicide is an ethical issue that not only has an effect on the individual, but it also reflects on the society where the individual lives. Euthanasia is an act of someone else ending someone’s life. Assisted suicide is the act of the individual having help in ending their own life. “Physician-assisted suicide (PAS), is slightly different than euthanasia; in using PAS, the patient is provided the means for terminating his or her life, but the patient, not the doctor, ends the life in question” (Mosser, 2010, Chp. 2.3, para. 31). However, not all assisted suicides may involve a doctor. In the United States, Oregon was the first state to pass an assisted-suicide law. Washington is a state that has as recently as 2008 adopted an act that allows residents that have less than six months to live to request a legal dose of medication. Eleven states, including Alabama, Idaho and North Carolina ‘have no enactments which criminalize aiding, abetting, assisting, or counseling suicide” (“Assisted Suicide,” 2010, para. 1-7). Several other states such as Alaska, California and Florida “criminalize aiding, abetting, and/or assisting suicide” (“Assisted Suicide,” 2010, para. 8). I am a Georgian and our law states that any involvement in an assisted suicide is a felony. The main conflict of assisted suicide...

Words: 2279 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Assisted Suicide

...Task A. Assisted suicide 1) The issues presented in text 1 and 2 are concerning the same subject, though they have a different view on the matter. Should we as a society, be able to bend the current laws in a way that it would be legal for a terminal ill patient, to commit voluntarily suicide? This is a common debate in the modern society we live in, as the progression of healthcare and medicine now makes people live longer - whether they like it or not. In these two texts, pros and cons for legalising medical suicide for some patients are discussed, with a touch of personal involvement, and therefor the texts are also subjective. The author of text 1, Nina Lakhani, is presenting some of the positive sides of assisted suicide. She uses quotes from Tony Nicklinson, a man suffering from locked-in syndrome due to a severe stroke, who is fighting for his right to a “dignified death”. When reading this, it seems perfectly logical, and ethical appropriate for this man to be able to end his live when he wants to. But this case raises a larger ethical debate on this matter. Do we really have the right to die? This is the question raised in text two, written by Allison Pearson, who does not think that we have the right to. Allison Pearson argues that “death is no longer considered an acceptable outcome” among doctors, and that a change in the laws of murder could have tremendous consequences, and that we would likely end up in a courtroom where any doctor could......

Words: 983 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Assisted Suicide

...Proposal Essay Assisted Suicide: A Catholic’s Right To Die The right to choose whether to live or die should reside with the person who is terminally ill and no one else. According to the Catholic Church there are three moral principles on conserving health and life: sanctity of life, God’s dominion and human stewardship, and the prohibition against killing. Promoting the morality of the right to life, compassionate care and the power of divine love, the Catholic Church tries to offer a hopeful perspective. Radically different views than those of the Catholic Church are expressed by both healthy and terminally ill patients when surveyed. Several national organizations have been founded supporting a persons’ choice, to include the Hemlock Society and the Final Exit Network both with Arizona chapters. One of the main reasons terminally ill patients want the right to choose assisted suicide is to be able to die with dignity. The thought of being unable to care for yourself or recognize your family is particularly frightening and unwanted by most people. Mentally competent adults have a basic human right to end their lives when they suffer from a fatal or irreversible illness or excessive pain, when their quality of life is personally unacceptable, and the future holds only hopelessness and misery. Arizona is one of 34 states that have explicitly criminalized assisted suicide; only the states of Oregon and Washington permit physician assisted suicide with the......

Words: 544 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Assisted Suicide

...Fate in Our Hands Assisted suicide is a controversial topic, sparking up questions and debates on whether it should be legal, or not. I argue that it should be legalized, it would be beneficial to some individuals because it would allow people with terminal illnesses to plan and prepare for their deaths, rather than go through pain and suffering, and the fear of not knowing when you could die. Assisted suicide, also commonly known as death with dignity, was created so that people could hold the power over their illness and be the ones to control the last moments of their life. I am not arguing that all people who are sick or ill should be allowed to participate in assisted suicide, we need to determine in what circumstances it would be appropriate. Who are we to say that someone has no right to a choice if they are suffering? However, before anything, we need to understand the difference between two terms; assisted suicide and euthanasia. Assisted suicide is “suicide committed with the aid of another person, sometimes a physician” (ahdictionary.com). Euthanasia is defined as “the act or practice of ending the life of a person or animal having a terminal illness or a medical condition that causes suffering perceived as incompatible with an acceptable quality of life, as by lethal injection or the suspension of certain medical treatments” (ahdictionary.com). While these sound like very similar terms, they are two completely different things. In assisted suicide the doctor......

Words: 877 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Assisted Suicide

...Assisted Suicide 1. Explain how the Patient Bill of Rights applies to this case. Nurse Nancy is violating the Patient Bill of Rights because Mrs. Jones did not make her own decision to end her life as a form of treatment. Mrs. Jones has the right to be involved in every aspect of treatment and can refuse treatment at any time. The patient is expecting reasonable continuity of care even though she might die. The patient’s doctor is supposed to inform Mrs. Jones if her condition is worsening and if she needs to seek different treatment options. Nurse Nancy did not ask the patient if she wanted to die, she just assumed because the patient is very ill that she may want to end her life. 2. Identify and explain at least three ethical considerations. Ethically it is a nurse’s job to help the doctor preserve a patient’s life. However, Nurse Nancy is the one that is with Mrs. Jones more and sees the drastic effect that the cancer has taken on her. Nurse Nancy has compassion for Mrs. Jones and knows that she is suffering from cancer, so to alleviate the pain she wants to help her end her life. Nurse Nancy needs to ask Mrs. Jones if she wants to die early because of her status as a single mom. In the event that Mrs. Jones does want Nurse Nancy to help her end her life she will need to make preparations for the care of child. Secondly, is it right for nurse Nancy to try and play God and end Mrs. Jones life? How does she know that she won’t get better? There may be new......

Words: 1340 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Assisted Suicide

...The Supreme Court Ruling on Physician-Assisted Death By The Canadian Nurses Protective Society May 2015  The Carter decision presents a profound change to Canadian law. What does the decision mean for nurses? It is a crime in Canada to assist another person in ending his or her own life. However, the Supreme Court of Canada created an exception, after analyzing Canadian constitutional law in the case of Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), released at the beginning of February 2015. The Supreme Court declared that the prohibition in section 241(b) of the Criminal Code on assisting with suicide is unconstitutional to the extent that it prevents physician-assisted death for “a competent adult person who (1) clearly consents to the termination of life and (2) has a grievous and irremediable medical condition (including an illness, disease or disability) that causes enduring suffering that is intolerable to the individual in the circumstances of his or her condition.” In creating this exception, the Carter decision represents a profound change to Canadian law. Nurses may now expect to receive more questions from patients and their families related to end-of-life care. It is important for nurses to understand the law and professional nursing standards relating to end-of-life care as they currently exist and as they may develop. The Carter ruling will take effect on Feb. 6, 2016. The Supreme Court suspended the operation of its ruling to allow the federal government time to...

Words: 1295 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Assisted Suicide

...Alexandra Chase DiLonardo RS 282 Film Reflection How To Die In Oregon The Right To Choose “And what will this medication do?” “It will kill me and make me happy.” These chilling lines of the opening scene of How To Die In Oregon truly relays the message of how grateful the ailed residents of Oregon are for the death with dignity law. We are met with a man named Roger, who seems more than eager to receive the medication that will kill him, as he is surrounded by a family that seemingly supports his decision. The entire film is focused on the ethical dilemma on physician assisted suicide; and how a patients decision affects the people surrounding them. It is no surprise there is a major ethical debate regarding the idea and action of euthanasia. Although, this is not a black and white issue, there is not precise right and wrong, mainly because each patient, doctor, and family situation is unique on a case by case basis. The most compelling and emotionally charged case in the film is Cody’s story. Cody is suffering from a countless amount of complications in her battle of terminal cancer. Cody acknowledges she doesn't want to die, but since she knows she will, she states “With death with dignity you do have some control over whats going to happen, you can offer that to your family. So it means you can have some good times…and have things be as normal as possible without being focused on when she is going to die because you know that.” It seems that control is a common......

Words: 871 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Assisted Suicide

...Assisted  suicide  for  terminally  ill  patients   The  issue  of  assisted  suicide  for  terminally  ill  patients  is  heavily  debated  and  relevant   nowadays  with  the  medical  technics  that  has  come  so  fare  making  it  almost  impossible  for   terminally  ill  patients  to  die  ‘by  choice’.  I  will  present  three  different  people’s  view  on  the   subject.       An  account  of  the  issue   In  2012  the  British  newspaper  The  Independent  brought  to  articles  with  two  different  views   on  assisted  suicide  on  their  website.  The  article  Tony  Nicklinson:  “Perhaps  I’ll  say  goodbye  on   Twitter”  written  by  former  nurse  Nina  Lakhani  concerning  the  patient  Tony  Nicklinson’s  wish   to  die  since  he  suffers  with  locked-­‐in  syndrome.  Nicklinson  sees  it  as  a  violation  of  his  human   rights  that  he  is  not  allowed  assisted  suicide.  ‘The  government  is  in  breach  of  Mr.  Nicklinson’s   Article  8  right  to  “privacy,  dignity  and  autonomy”,  a  right  he ......

Words: 1000 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Assisted Suicide

...Assisted Suicide Abstract This paper identifies and explains how the Patient Bill of Rights applies to Nancy giving Mrs. Jones an extra dose of narcotic. It also discusses three ethical and three legal considerations. It also identifies and explains three business considerations. Finally it explains what the manager should do in this situation and why. Improving the end of life and advocating for a “good death” has become the mission of many dedicated individuals and organizations, and is also a frequent subject of research and focus for policy improvements (Jennings, Runder, and D’Onofrio, 2003). Assisted Suicide Effective health care requires collaboration between patients and physicians and other health care professionals. Open and honest communication, respect for personal and professional values, and sensitivity to differences are integral to optimal patient care. As the setting for the provision of health services, hospitals must provide a foundation for understanding and respecting the rights and responsibilities of patients, their families, physicians, and other caregivers. Hospitals must ensure a health care ethic that respects the role of patients in decision making about treatment choices and other aspects of their care. Hospitals must be sensitive to cultural, racial, linguistic, religious, age, gender, and other differences as well as the needs of persons with disabilities (A patient’s bill of rights, 1992). To participate effectively......

Words: 788 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Assisted Suicide

...Anyways? Assisted Suicide is the common term for the actions which an individual helps another person end their life. Physician-assisted suicide should be an allowed medical option for competent, terminally ill adults with terminal illnesses, who are in uncontrollable pain, because it is a compassionate response to relieve dying people. If a person becomes extremely ill and they are of sound mind they should have the right to die if there is no hope of a cure and if they have arrived at that decision with the total understanding of their condition and its prognosis. People should be able to make the decision on when the length of their lives becomes less important than the quality of their lives. When a person has become so sick and does not want to continue suffering, should they be forced to stay alive? Shouldn’t they be able to make their own decisions? Whose life is it anyways? It is about a person’s suffering that cannot be relieved and not turning away from them when they ask for help. Between 1994 and 2006, there were 75 legislative bills to legalize Physician Assisted Suicide in 21 states and all of them failed. Currently it is legal in Oregon, Washington and Montana. When patients in Oregon were asked the reasons behind their decision to end their lives, 86% reported a decreasing ability to participate in activities, 100% reported loss of autonomy and 86 % reported loss of dignity. Of those patients in Oregon that requested Physician assisted suicide,......

Words: 662 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Assisted Suicide

...Aided suicide is really a dilemma that various people today in America have confronted within their life span. Do you find it appropriate or perhaps do you find it inappropriate? It really is a subject left up to that individual. You will find not one but two features to just about every scenario and naturally you will find a couple facets to this particular one. The meaning regarding suicide stands out as “the action involving eliminating yourself deliberately with the aid of another person, sometimes a physician (Dictionary, 2012).” For you to merely use this description then one may possibly declare the fact that it’s improper. Subsequently to alternatively state that it ended up being more beneficial to stop someone’s struggling then one might possibly suggest the fact that it’s acceptable. Assisted suicide continues to be one of the more questionable matters plaguing contemporary society these days (Conwell & Caine, 1991). The individuals which have been looking for ways to have assisted suicide legalized are convinced that absolutely everyone should pass away having self-respect as well as without the need of enduring fatal health problems and this needs to be the patients rightful option (Pretzer, 2000). Anti-assisted action is without a doubt in opposition to legalizing this as a result of the potential risks associated with permitting individuals to terminate their particular existence lawfully regardless of whether it’s on their own or perhaps by making use of a......

Words: 1659 - Pages: 7