Free Essay

Ayn Rand

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By rylchan88
Words 1123
Pages 5
1. Is Rand correct in saying that if you accept altruism, then you end up with lack of self-esteem and a lack of respect for others?

I opined that Rand is incorrect in saying this. Altruism, according to Rand, is “willing to sacrifice your life for others.” This is consistent with the dictionary definitions of altruism such as “unselfish regard for or devotion to the welfare of others.” By accepting altruism, a person showed that he has respect for the value of life. On the contrary, studies have shown that practicing altruism enhances personal well – being and affects the community positively as a whole. And because when we give, without expecting return is true charity. To some extend; due to vested interest, people are more willing to go the extra mile to help their family and friends as they are likely to suffer if their friends and family is at risk. However, it has nothing to do with neither lack of self-esteem nor lack of respect for others. 2. Is Rand criticizing ideal or reciprocal altruism? Do you think that she would differentiate between the two? Would you?
It seemed that Rand is criticizing reciprocal altruism. It refers to the human social idea and expectation that if a person performs an altruistic act, other people will perform altruistic acts in return. She argues that to sacrifice oneself for another person will result in a threat to one’s existence and helping other is not a moral duty or obligation. However, I disagree, as I know that, “no man is an island,” we cannot live by ourselves, and we most certainly would have encountered situations whereby we help others because we would also want help from others next time. I think that Rand would not be able to differentiate the two: ideal & reciprocal as she has a fixation on reciprocal altruism and she is unable to see that pure, ideal altruism. A mother suffering complications in her pregnancy would rather die than let her child die, such selfless unconditional love is intangible between mother and child is something that cannot be explained or denied. While altruism is practiced, whether ideal or reciprocal, we should not focus on people’s motives but recognize that it is only human nature. There is no wrong in giving the beggar a coin for my satisfaction, but does the beggar care? He is still thankful – that is what matters.

3. Comment on the following question: “ The proper method of judging when or whether one should help another person is by reference to one’s own rational self-interest and one’s own hierarchy of values: the time money or effort one gives or the risk one takes should proportionate to the value of the person in relation to one’s own happiness,” What might the social and political outcome be if that approach were implemented?
“Call a spade, a spade,” whether altruism practiced is ideal or reciprocal; it is still an act of altruism. There are two distinct social outcome if the above mentioned were to be implemented. Firstly, people will grow to be calculative. We understand and know that “no man is an island,” so we will need help at some point in time. The proper method of judging will become a calculation to whether one should help another person is by the time money or effort one gives; then the measurement of time money or effort has to be defined rather clearly. Secondly, people might take advantage of those who are softhearted and abuse their “rights” to ask for assistance. “If you scratch my back, I will scratch yours,” it is scary to think that we can be selfish like that. Not too long ago, we has an incident in Singapore whereby a man was caught spitting at two women at a bus interchange. The second woman who was allegedly spat on was trying to help the first woman who was already in the queue that the man claims that he was previous in. If not for the second lady’s help, the man would have got off the hook easily for being a public nuisance and especially rude to the first lady. Noting that there were plenty of bystanders around, but nobody chose to help either of the ladies. http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2013/10/rude-man-spitting-at-commuters-in-bus-interchange/
At a political level, politicians have to exhibit individualism to certain extend striving towards their own fulfillment and self-interest, sometimes putting citizens in a compromising situation to accomplish their agenda.

5. Go back to Chapter 3 and reread, in the excerpt from Ruth Benedict’s paper “Anthropology and the Abnormal,” the section about “ unbridled and arrogant egoist” as being typical of Western civilization. What might Rand’s comment be about that remark?
I would assume that Rand would not agree to Ruth Benedict’s assessment of the western civilization as unbridled and arrogant egoist because of her background. Rand moved to the United States in the twenties and had been exposed to the culture as well as people there. She found America to be the most moral country in the world. “My philosophy… is the concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose of his life,” from Atlas Shrugged, it allowed me to see the kind of perspective that Rand had at the point in time. Moreover, she placed high regard for man’s intellect and rationality; hence if one is rational, one’s only judge of values and only guide to action. Therefore, being “unbridled and arrogant egoist” is an outward behavior, which is not rational nor shows the setting of man’s moral standard.

6. On p. 196 you read that one philosophical argument against Rand is her false dichotomy between altruism and objectivism. Here you’ve read her own words that altruism itself engages in a false dichotomy between selflessness and inhumanity. Which version do you find most compelling? Is there another fallacy from Chapter 1 that might apply to Rand’s text? (Strawman fallacy)
I find that altruism and objectivism make a more compelling argument as objectivism rejects any form of altruism. While the former teaches that one cannot look out for both- one’s own interests and interests of others; no one can live a perfectly altruistic life. Tyranny, slavery, conquest are acts that were committed because people were overly caring? No! Such evil was committed to benefit someone at the expense of another.

The comparison between love and sacrifice seemed to me like a Strawman fallacy. The author argues, “Any action that a man undertakes for the benefit of those he loves is not a sacrifice.” It showed a distorted version of a position that does not address the actual position.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Ayn Rand

...Ayn Rand was born Alissa Zinovievna Rosenbaum in St. Petersburg, Russia on February 2nd, 1905. She produced many works of fiction within her life and is applauded for the cultivation of her philosophical system-Objectivism. Ms. Rand passed away in 1982; her writing and ideals continue to influence society, literature, and surprisingly, the video game industry. After reading Her Second Career and Good Copy, it is easy to see why this author is held in such high esteem. Despite the tone of the stories being very different, the concept of wealth, the behavior of the main characters, and the traits of Ayn Rand's philosophy are all shared. While Her Second Career takes place in the glitzy scenes of Hollywood and Good Copy in the small-town of Dicksville, Ayn Rand does a fantastic job of conveying the influence of wealth no matter the setting. The characters in both stories run the gambit on the socioeconomic scale of the haves and the have-nots. Claire Nash lives a lofty life with "a palace in Beverly Hills and two Rolls Royces" pg. 112 while Laury McGee resides in an old apartment building. It is not until Ms. Nash undertakes Winston Ayer's challenge that she is forced to understand the struggles of aspiring actresses and the financial hardships endured in pursuit of their dreams. In Good Copy, it is not until Mr. McGee has kidnapped Ms. Winford that he receives his crash course in economics. It is obvious to the reader that Laury is aware of Ms. Winford's value based on...

Words: 855 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Ayn Rand Theory

...Objectivism This video discusses about Ayn Rand philosophy which claims that the highest moral purpose is the achievement of one’s own happiness. This philosophy is known as Objectivism, which is mainly based by objective absolute with the concept that reality exists as an objective reality, the reason to guiding man’s action and basic means of survival, self-interest where each man is an end to himself and not the means for others through sacrifices and lastly capitalism where men deal one another as traders who voluntary exchange for mutual benefits. Her philosophy also mentioned that morality is proved by means of logic and man needs a rational morality which is not based on faith, emotions and etc, but only on reason. Rand further explained that man has to hold on reason as his only guide to action and live by independent judgement of his own mind, Ethic of Emergencies Theory The Ethic of Emergency Theory is based on Rand’s philosophy of Objectivism. This theory challenges the understanding of altruism where it argued about the self-interest of a man who she believes that the highest moral purpose is to pursue own happiness. She mentioned that altruistic persons suffer from lack self-esteem, failing to respect others, have sceptical morality and pessimistic idea of existence. She also pointed out that this people are those who did not value their own existence as they sacrifice themselves for others sake. Rand also pointed out her extreme opinion that altruistic person...

Words: 513 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Anthem, Emancipation Proclamation, By Ayn Rand

...Who am I really? The texts we looked at are Anthem by Ayn Rand, “Emancipation Proclamation,” by Abraham Lincoln, Prometheus from Greek Mythology,”Critical Thinking Video by Leo, and a Socratic Seminar. I am a person who is needy and self-absorbed but also very equivalent. First, Equality is also very equivalent. For example, Rand states,“ We are nothing. Mankind is all…’’ This connects to my life because everyone should be equal there should not ever be a person who is as an individual. Equality’s world, everyone is told that the only reason for an individual to live is to serve his "fellow brothers." Everyone is equal to everyone else, which means that each person has to be the same as everyone else. Society is rigidly controlled to ensure that nobody has the opportunity to stand out as an individual, or even think of himself as one....

Words: 690 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Commentary On Anthem, By Ayn Rand

...Ayn Rand “I guard my treasures: my thought, my will, my freedom. And the greatest of these is freedom.” (Rand. 58). Ayn Rand treasured her personal beliefs, which were reflected through her writing. Rand lived in two distinct countries: Russia and the United States, during her lifetime. Ayn also lived during a time where many major global events occurred. A very unique and interesting childhood and adult life, subjective beliefs and philosophies, and major events occurring in the world around her were all factors that contributed to Ayn Rand’s perspective and style of writing in her infamous novel, Anthem. Ayn Rand, the oldest of three daughters, was born on February 2, 1906 (Gladstein. 3,4). Rand’s given birth name was Alisa Zinovievna...

Words: 2014 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Ayn Rand Anthem Analysis

...What are the words which we have lost?¨ Equality 7-2521 states of Ayn Rand Anthem. This classic novella is about one man facing the laws of the society. Were everyone thinks he’s a sinner. He fights for equality. Along his trials he finds out what the passion to love to be elated, to feel free. Equality 7-2521 was in a dark world to begin with. He wanted to escape the society, he finally is facing the fact and letting go of all the pain,fear,doubt. The fearful dark and quiet city, no one talks everyone listens everyone is equal. He is breaking a law because he’s alone. “The laws say that none among men may be along at anytime. For this is the great transgression and the root of all evil.¨ (Rand 17)...

Words: 545 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ayn Rand Anthem Analysis

...Anthem Writing contest I am. I think. I will, when these words are thought nothing out of the ordinary comes to mind. According to Ayn Rand’s book anthem, mine, my, and I are all taken for granted. Ayn Rand was born in 1905 and her book Anthem, published in 1938 kick started a all new genre of dystopian society books. In Anthem a future world has lost technology and all knowledge of individualism. They have abandoned the thought of themselves and now “worship” the word we. Equality 7-2151 breaks we’s invisible bond made by us and we then created a brand new utopian society, that thrives on individualism. The perfect society equality created at the end of the book will include little to no rules from his past home because, he ran away from these rules, equality knows the unspeakable word, and the leader of his land is himself. Equality 7-2125 grew up just like everybody else. At age five left for schooling then at age fifteen got a job as a streetsweeper, doing everything as a whole with no thought of themselves whatsoever. Then years later his world changed when he found a grate within the outskirts of the colony and ventured inside. In the tunnel he was in awe at the sophistication of everything the tunnel...

Words: 751 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Anthem Ayn Rand Anthem Analysis

... In the book we see that only after equality leaves the city does he obtain real freedom. In the book anthem Ayn Rand uses a future from which their is no freedom, near to no happiness and not a good feeling of people getting along. In the time period that takes place thousands of years in the future the world has hit a reset where their main source of light comes from candles and torches. Equality will be the only one to get out and ever obtain what the rest of them don't have. In chapter 8 when equality laughs when he remembers he is the “the darned” (I do not wish to swear even when I write), but we end up to seeing that he is free is bound by no man to be told what to do. Equality knows truly of happiness and truth because of what his society did to him and showed him....

Words: 748 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Anthem By Ayn Rand: Literary Analysis

...Anthem by Ayn Rand expresses many forces including love and fear. Love and fear are extremely different forces, yet they can completely change a person's outlook on something. Throughout the story, fear shapes Equality’s identity, not because of his own feardom, but because he witnessed how the whole community was scared to be individuals. Equality did not want to live his life in fear of being different, so he went off on his own to be different. As the story goes on, and Equality meets the Golden One, he develops love towards her. This love shapes Equality's personality. Both forces, love, and fear, shape Equality's identity throughout the story and continue to shape people around him. Love shapes Equality's personality because of...

Words: 553 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Anthem By Ayn Rand: An Analysis

...The society that exists within the pages of Anthem values collective thought and rejects individuality in any way, as “there are no men but only the great WE” (Rand 19). This is especially unfortunate for Equality 7-2521, one man out of his many “brothers” and “sisters.” For Equality is not like his fellow men. He is more inquisitive than his brothers, more intelligent than his brothers. But it is sinful to be different. When Equality became 15 years old and stood before the Council of Vocations to receive his Life Mandate (the job he will perform for the rest of his life), he was assigned the lowly and insulting job of Street Sweeper. This designation did not occur by error or incompetence, however. The Council of Vocations assigned Equality...

Words: 1015 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Equality In Chrysanthem, By Ayn Rand

...a new power of nature. And we have discovered it alone, and we are alone to know it” (Rand 52). The newly found power becomes the only source of individuality Equality possesses. Similarly, the only choice for Equality after he finishes his work is to share his newfound invention with his society, regardless of the consequences he may receive. Equality completes...

Words: 406 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Comparing The Rules Of The City In Anthem, By Ayn Rand

...Imagine sharing a room with a hundred people, none of which question the set of rules before them. Do not say the sacred word, do not be individual, you must love all men equally. The object of choice is invalid. This is from the book Anthem, written by Ayn Rand, who escaped communism in Russia and set herself a new belief; objectivism. Like Ayn Rand, the main character, Equality 7-2521, perceives these rules as unjust, therefore rebels against them. Equality later then escapes the City and discovers himself, creating a new set of rules which will compare to one’s of the city. Although that is what he tried to detain from. There is no “we,” but there is an “I.” The rules of the City are there to set a norm throughout the people, and to demolish...

Words: 412 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Antherm Literary Analysis Of Anthem By Ayn Rand

...Antherm Literary Analysis: Self understanding The future, a huge mystery to everyone and everything. It yields many choices and paths for mankind, to reach out to space, to become united as one, or to destroy our world or make every man a slave and subdue to a higher power. One of these paths taken by men is shown in the book “Anthem” by Ayn Rand. Instead of furthering our technology, intelligence of the world, or peace among us, we choose, or a council chooses, to make every man, woman, every individual to be a “drone” or a slave to a society that suppresses talents and destroys individual thoughts and actions. The society has taken a step back, going to candles and carriages. People are forced to do jobs that a large council chooses for them and everyone is so obedient that that the thought of being “disobedient” to the council is a sin. But in every dark, gloomy dystopia, there is a small light that can lead someone on a path to push back the suppression or the higher power. All it takes is a single individual to make something amazing and that influences the way he/she challenges themself and the society that they live in. In “Anthem”, this individual is Equality 7-2521 or Prometheus by the end of the book who brings light in a...

Words: 1921 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Equality 7-2521's Names In Anthem, By Ayn Rand

...In today’s society, a great deal of consideration goes into choosing a child’s name. We want it to be meaningful and so we take into consideration heritage, trends, and personal characteristics, as if it will influence who they will become. This is not the case in Anthem, by Ayn Rand, where names are assigned to people randomly at birth; one word, five numbers. In Anthem, the main characters Equality 7-2521 and Liberty 5-3000’s names are an ironic contrast to their personalities. Equality 7-2521’s name is ironic in that by definition, equality means everyone is the same and there is no place for individuality. His strong belief was that all people should be recognized as individuals, and we watched him struggle with this belief throughout the novel. Equality 7-2521 demonstrated this when he was working in the tunnel under the subway. He was illegally working on a project that had the potential to significantly improve the lives of everyone in their society. His inventing made him realize “how...

Words: 608 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Altruism In Ayn Rand's Anthem

...Zinn’s style. Rand says, “Altruism is evil” (Ayn). Altruism is the belief in or practice of disinterested and selfless concern for the well-being of others. Certainly not what Rand stood for, but Howard Zinn did. He believed in being there for your neighbor, friends, family, or others who needed you. Rand’s Objectivism was also not a loving and caring philosophy. She never once said, “Remember your friends and family, they are the ones who will be there when you fall.” Consistent with a display of selfish values, those were her ideas, “what's yours is mine and what's mine is mine.” Her ideas lacked generosity and faith or religion. Difficult as it may seem, she was said to be a nice old lady who has been just like a cuddly grandma, that's hard to imagine. Wikipedia says of Objectivisim, “that the only social system consistent with this morality is one that displays full respect for individual rights embodied in “Laissez-Faire Capitalism”, and that the role of art in human life is to transform humans' metaphysical ideas by selective reproduction of reality into a physical form—a work of art—that one can...

Words: 583 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Essay on Rand's Ideas

...Essay on Rand’s Ideas Ayn Rand states in her essay that there is an alternative between being either an altruist, who will sacrifice their lives for complete strangers, and being cold egoist who would not lift a finger to help anyone. Ayn developed a theory which known as Objectivism, which means that those that follow that will only pursue their own happiness and will only sacrifice themselves for those they love or hold interest in. She states that just because one is not willing to sacrifice their life for a complete stranger, it does not mean that they are cold and self centered, only that they hold more respect for their own lives or those of the ones they love. Rand’s ideas on Objectivism may not have fit very well in to the moral world we live in today. For example, take our military service member’s, if they were not altruists, who would defend our country in these times of war. If everyone only fended for themselves and for their own happiness, who would join the military. Our service members risk their lives every day, especially during this war on terrorism, they are sacrificing themselves for perfect strangers. If they were not altruistic individuals, how else would our country stay safe. Ayn Rand and her followers believed that the military draft was not right and went against individual rights. In the “In the lecture, “The Wreckage of the Consensus,” Rand specifically argues against withdrawal from Vietnam, calling it an act of “appeasement”: To continue...

Words: 538 - Pages: 3