Free Essay

Battle of Blitzkreig

In: Historical Events

Submitted By framarinin
Words 843
Pages 4
Battle of the Huertgen Forest

During the Battle of the Huertgen Forest, Major General Norman D. Cota was tasked with being the commander of the 28th Infantry Division. As the commander of this division he now was responsible for the lives of more than 15,000 men. “The division’s performance had been considered unsatisfactory by its parent headquarters, XIX Corps, and Cota, with his reputation of strict discipline and leading from the front, had been brought in to correct the leadership challenges present within the division”. Prior to the Battle of the Huertgen Forest assignment, Cota had become somewhat of a legend for his bravery and leadership on Omaha Beach and earned the reputation as a ‘fighting general’. His reputation would take a major fall when his division was destroyed during the Battle of the Huertgen Forest. The reasons for the American loss at the Battle of the Huertgen Forest can be mostly attributed to the failure to follow the nine principles of war – specifically the principle of “mass”, which states that combat power should be concentrated at the decisive place and time to achieve military superiority. Failure at certain war fighting functions also attributed to the disaster that occurred at the Battle of the Huertgen Forest – mainly the functions of command and control, sustainment (logistics), intelligence (reconnaissance), and fires (artillery support). The Battle of the Huertgen Forest began on September 12, 1944 when the 3rd Armored Division entered the village of Rott. About a month later on October 18, General Hodges was informed that his First Army would begin an offensive in the Huertgen Forest mission with an objective to capture the town of Schmidt. Hodges’ plan was for the “28th to capture Vossenack and the tree line facing the village of Huertgen. Gerow directed that an entire regiment would assault Huertgen to the north; a second regiment would attack and capture Schmidt in the center and a third regiment attack south towards Rafflesbrand”. Cota strongly disagreed with this plan and believed it “violated many of the nine principles of war, most especially objective and mass”. With different regiments attacking separate locations, the plan failed to agree with the principle of mass. Cota’s concern would prove to be legitimate as American forces would later fail to retain control over the town of Schmidt. Cota made three vital mistakes that would prove to negatively impact his division’s success during the Battle of the Huertgen Forest. The first was that “neither he nor his staff directed subordinate units to conduct patrolling into the Huertgen Forest”. This first mistake showed failure at the war fighting function of intelligence, as American troops were basically blind going into the battle without much information of German positioning in the forest. The second mistake was that “Cota had approved the extremely narrow Kall trail to serve as the division’s main supply route”. War fighting functions of both sustainment and intelligence were violated with this mistake – “Aerial reconnaissance could not confirm the trails condition due to the dense forest covering it but ground patrols would have provided much valuable information, both about the enemy and the trail”. Cota’s third mistake was his decision not to use armor to support his infantry. This mistake went against the war fighting function of fires by not using supporting artillery to aid his infantry in battle. It was originally thought that the tanks would not be able to navigate through the dense forest but they later realized that tanks could operate in many areas and could provide valuable support to the infantry. The Americans had lost the Battle of the Huertgen Forest, failing to capture Schmidt, and Cota’s 28th Division was relieved. The major reasons that the 28th was unsuccessful included: the Kall trail was inadequate as the main supply route (sustainment function failure); enemy resistance was much stronger than expected (intelligence function failure); and they failed to suppress or destroy the Germans and didn’t use artillery fire well (fires function failure). Command and control was also poor during the battle, General Cota’s “efforts to command and control the division had not been anywhere near what he would have liked it to have been. With his three regiments attacking in three different directions, communication had been poor at best”. By spending most of the battle at his command post Cota was unable to evaluate what was taking place on the battlefield and was therefore unable to influence the events that were taking place. This was the reason Cota was believed to have lost control of his division and eventually lost control of the battle. Despite being blamed for much of these failures during the Battle of the Huertgen Forest, Cota was in a poor position, leading a division with a nearly impossible mission. Cota did not agree with the original plan of the battle and informed his superiors that it went against the principle of mass. Unfortunately, Major General Cota will most likely be remembered for botching the Battle of the Huertgen Forest rather than as the ‘Fighting General’ during the Normandy invasion.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay


...Second World War. Some trace it back to the anger created in Germany by the Treaty of Versailles. Some blame Neville Chamberlain and the appeasers for being too weak. Some ascribe it to Hitler's aggression. The war broke out when Hitler invaded Poland. Britain declared war two days later, on 3 September. At first there was a 'Phoney War' – nothing happened – but in 1940 the Nazis attacked. Their Blitzkreig tactics quickly destroyed the Allied forces, and the British army was evacuated from Dunkirk. For a while, Britain faced the Nazis alone, and had to survive the Battle of Britain and the Blitz. In June 1941 Hitler invaded Russia and in December 1941, the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor brought America into the war. The war became a truly global conflict. Meanwhile, in Europe, the Nazis implemented their 'Final Solution' to exterminate all Jewish people. The critical battles which changed the course of the war were at Midway in the Pacific (June 1942), El-Alamein in Africa (November 1942) and Stalingrad in Russia (January 1943). After that, the Allies never lost a battle. On D-Day (6 June 1944), the Allies invaded Normandy. The Soviet Red Army was advancing from the east. Hitler committed suicide, and Germany surrendered (7 May 1945). On 6 August 1945 the Americans dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, and Japan surrendered on VJ Day (15 August 1945). The Second World War took place on a global scale. You may wish to compare the Second World War to other......

Words: 284 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Philosophy and Design

...Philosophy and Design Pieter E. Vermaas • Peter Kroes Andrew Light • Steven A. Moore Philosophy and Design From Engineering to Architecture Pieter E. Vermaas Delft University of Technology Delft the Netherlands Andrew Light University of Washington Seattle USA Peter Kroes Delft University of Technology Delft the Netherlands Steven A. Moore University of Texas Austin USA ISBN 978-1-4020-6590-3 e-ISBN 978-1-4020-6591-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2007937486 © 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V. No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Printed on acid-free paper. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contents List of Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Design in Engineering and Architecture: Towards an Integrated Philosophical Understanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Peter Kroes, Andrew Light, Steven A. Moore, and Pieter E. Vermaas Part I Engineering Design ix 1 Design, Use, and the Physical and Intentional Aspects of Technical Artifacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...

Words: 165744 - Pages: 663