Free Essay

Bio Reactor Landfill - an Overview

In: Science

Submitted By anushajohn1708
Words 4528
Pages 19
Solid Waste Management: An Overview Of Bioreactor Landfills
Anusha John#, Ajay kumar K#, Abdul Shiyas M A#, Sreenath H#

Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Calicut
NIT Campus P O, PIN 673601, Kerala
1manjalyjohn@gmail.com
2ajaykumar@nitc.ac.in
3shiyas2003@yahoo.co.in
4srinad@gmail.com

Abstract--- A landfill is a site for the disposal of waste materials by burial and is one of the most common methods of solid waste management in various parts of the world. Significant environmental and economic benefits can be gained by making small changes in the way the landfills are operated. Bioreactor landfill is a promising biotechnological option for faster stabilization of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW). It changes the goal of landfilling from the storage of waste to the treatment of waste.
In a bioreactor landfill environment, the solid waste actively decomposes rather than being simply buried in a dry tomb. This active decomposition is possible because over half the MSW is comprised of organic material (food, paper, etc.), which will decompose fairly rapidly under the right conditions. Rather than being kept dry, the solid waste is actively moistened by injecting leachate into the landfilled solid waste to accelerate decomposition. The anaerobic conditions in a conventional landfill can be replaced with aerobic conditions by introducing air into the solid waste and thus enhancing the biological process. Studies show that a bioreactor landfill transforms and stabilizes the readily and moderately decomposable organic waste constituents within five to ten years. A bioreactor increases the potential for waste to energy conversion, stores and/or treats leachate, recovers air space, and ensures sustainability. Sustainability has the greatest potential for economic benefit due to reduced costs associated with avoided long-term monitoring and maintenance and delayed siting of a new landfill
This paper presents an overview of the bioreactor landfill concept, benefits to be derived, design and operational issues. It also gives a general comparison between a dry tomb landfill and a bioreactor landfill from various studies undergone and thus finds bioreactor landfill an effective and feasible method of MSW management. I. INTRODUCTION
The generation of solid waste has become an increasingly important global issue over the last decade due to the escalating growth in world population and large increase in waste production. This increase in solid waste generation poses numerous questions concerning the adequacy of conventional waste management systems and their environmental effects. Landfill disposal is the most common waste management method worldwide. Landfills have served as ultimate waste receptors for municipal refuse, industrial residues, recycle discards and wastewater sludge. The method of Municipal Solid Wastes (MSW) disposal in most of the urban and rural areas of developing countries is open dumping. This practice causes public health and environmental problems.

Wastes in landfill experience physical and biological changes resulting in solubilization or suspension of high concentrations of organic matter in the landfill’s leachate. Source reduction and waste minimization, resource recovery and recycling, waste processing and treatment, combustion and land filling have all significantly affected the sufficiency of waste management systems. Of all available management options for solid waste management, landfill disposal is the most commonly employed waste management worldwide. Landfilling is the final and ultimate disposal of solid waste.
The problem with open dumpsites is that when it rains, the leachate seeps through the soil and contaminates the neighbourhood. In a bio-reactor landfill, the leachate is trapped and put back into the dump. The micro-organisms in the leachate help faster degradation of the waste (in about five years). If this degradation happens in the absence of oxygen (anaerobic) then landfill gas (mainly methane) will come out which could be piped away for use. The degraded waste could be scooped out, making room for fresh wastes. And out of the scoops, all that is not degraded could be separated. [1]
Engineered bioreactor landfills are usually designed to minimize the infiltration of rainwater and/or snowmelt into the solid waste. The design objectives of these landfills are to minimize leachate migration into the subsurface environment and maximize landfill gas generation rates under controlled conditions. [2] A bioreactor landfill is a sanitary landfill that uses enhanced microbiological processes to transform and stabilize the readily and moderately decomposable organic waste constituents within 5 to 10 years of bioreactor process implementation. The process requires significant liquid addition through leachate recirculation to reach and maintain optimal conditions. Strategies including waste shredding, pH adjustment, nutrient addition, waste pre-disposal and post-disposal conditioning, and temperature management, may also serve to optimize the bioreactor process [3]. Engineered bioreactor landfill sites can provide a more controlled means by which society can reduce the emission of global warming landfill gas (LFG), additionally they can provide immediate improvements to the surrounding local environment [4]. Bioreactor landfills provide accelerated waste biodegradation, a means for recovery of capacity or air space and a means to enhance LFG generation rates [5].
As compared to many developed countries, the concept of bioreactor landfills is still relatively very new to India [6]. There are bio-reactors in many parts of the world, but India is yet to have its first. Such engineered landfills are the crying need of the hour, not only because it is increasingly becoming difficult to find adequate dumpsites near cities, but also in view of the health hazards the open landfills pose.

II. OPERATION OF A BIOREACTOR LANDFILL A. Essential Components Of A Bioreactor Landfill
The essential components of a landfill are:
(a) A liner system at the base and sides of the landfill
(b) A leachate collection and control facility
© A gas collection and control facility (optional for small landfills)
(d) A final cover system at the top of the landfill.
(e) A surface water drainage system
(f) An environmental monitoring system
(g) A closure and post-closure plan

B. Bioreactor Mechanism

Bioreactor landfill is an emerging technology for solid waste management. The basic concept of bioreactor landfill is to use specific design and operation practices to accelerate the decomposition of food waste, green-waste, paper and other organic wastes in a landfill by promoting optimum moisture content and sufficient nutrients for the microorganisms to degrade the waste. The method not only enhances the degradation processes, but also stabilizes the landfill as quickly as possible. Landfill stabilization means that the environmental performance parameters (landfill gas composition, generation rate and leachate concentration) remain at a steady level. Biological processes are known to reduce the fraction of solid waste. Leachate recirculation system in a bioreactor landfill is one of the techniques that can be used to enhance solid waste biodegradation. Landfill’s leachate may contain high concentration of organic and inorganic materials including toxic compounds and heavy metals [7]. The recirculation of landfill’s leachate accelerates the rate at which the waste is broken down, thus decreasing the time required to stabilize the landfill’s site. This is important because the longer a landfill remains un- stabilized, the longer it remains as a source for potential environmental problems (e.g., groundwater contamination and methane gas migration). Bioreactor landfill avoids the problem of future liner failure because the wastes decompose within (5-10) years.

C. Bioreactor Landfill Types 1) Aerobic-Anaerobic: The aerobic-anaerobic bioreactor is designed to accelerate waste degradation by combining attributes of the aerobic and anaerobic bioreactors. The objective is to cause a rapid biodegradation of food and other easily degradable waste in the aerobic stage to reduce organic acids in the anaerobic stage resulting in the earlier methanogenesis. In this system, the uppermost lift of waste is aerated while the lifts below receive liquids. Horizontal wells, installed in each lift during construction, are used to transport landfill gases, liquids and air. 2) Anaerobic: The anaerobic bioreactor seeks to accelerate the degradation of waste by optimizing conditions for anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobic bacteria are responsible for converting organic wastes into organic acids and ultimately into methane and carbon dioxide. The moisture condition that is required to optimize anaerobic degradation is about field capacity or (35-40) % moisture. The moisture content in typical landfills is around (10-20) % water. Moisture is typically added in a form of leachate through a variety of delivery systems. Sewage sludge can be added too as a source of moisture. This leads to an increase in the amount of landfill gas production that is then collected by the gas collection system in the landfill. 3) Aerobic: The Aerobic Bioreactor accelerates waste degradation by optimizing conditions for aerobes that are organisms that require oxygen for cellular respiration. In aerobic respiration, energy is delivered from organic molecules in a process that consumes oxygen and produces carbon dioxide. Aerobes require sufficient water to function as anaerobes. Aerobic organisms can grow more quickly than anaerobes because aerobic respiration is more efficient at generating energy than anaerobic respiration. In landfills, aerobic activity is promoted through injection of air into the waste mass. The aerobic process does not generate methane. The aerobic process is much accelerated and typically requires less than two years for full biodegradation. 4) Facultative Bioreactor: The facultative bioreactor combines conventional anaerobic degradation with a mechanism for controlling the high ammonia concentration that may be developed when liquids are added to the landfill. In this system, leachate containing high levels of ammonia is treated using the biological process of nitrification. The nitrifying bacteria convert the ammonia to nitrate that can be used by facultative bacteria in the absence of oxygen for respiration. A Facultative bioreactor requires adequate moisture to function optimally. Leachate and other liquids (like surface water) are used to increase the moisture content of the waste. D. Generation Of Landfill Gases
The concept of bioreactor landfill considers water and solid waste, as major inputs while leachate and gas are the principal outputs. The primary gases that can be found in landfills include ammonia, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen and oxygen. They are produced from the decomposition of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Methane and carbon dioxide are considered the main landfill gases that are produced from biodegradable organic waste components in landfill. The generation of landfill gases can be divided into five-phases: 1) Initial Adjustment Stage: The organic biodegradable components in municipal solid waste undergo a microbial decomposition with the presence of oxygen soon after the waste is placed in the landfill. In this phase, biological composition occurs under aerobic reaction in which oxygen is consumed by aerobic microorganisms. Digested wastewater treatment plant sludge and recycled leachate can be considered as other sources of organisms. The aerobic decomposition generates heat, and temperature (10-20_C) higher than the refuse placement temperature [8]. 2 ) Transition Phase: In this phase, oxygen is exhausted and the anaerobic conditions begin to develop. Nitrate and sulfate, which serve as electron acceptors, are converted to nitrogen gas and hydrogen sulfide during biological conversion reactions. The onset of anaerobic conditions can be observed by measuring the oxidation/reduction potential of the waste. The generation of methane occurs when the oxidation/reduction potential values are in the range of 150 to 300 millivolts [9]. During the transition phase, the Ph of the generated leachate starts to drop due to the high concentrations of carbon dioxide and the presence of organic acids. 3) Acid Phase: Microbial activities which are originally initiated in second phase accelerate significant amount of organic acid and reduce the hydrogen gas. There are two major reactions that occur in this phase. The first reaction is the enzyme-mediated transformation (hydrolysis) of higher molecular mass components (e.g., lipids, polysaccharides, proteins, and nucleic acids) into compounds that can be used by microorganisms as sources of energy. Acidogenesis is the second reaction of this phase, which involves the conversion of microbial compounds resulting from the first reaction into lower molecular mass, compounds such acetic acid (CH3COOH). The microorganisms involved in this conversion are often known as non-methanogenic or acidogens [8]. Carbon dioxide is the primary gas generated during this phase with a small amount of hydrogen gas. The Ph of generated leachate drops to 5 or lower due to the elevated concentration of CO2 inside the landfill. The biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), chemical oxygen demand (COD) and conductivity of the leachate will increase due to the dissolution of the organic acids in the leachate. Many inorganic constituents in particular heavy metals will be solubilized during this phase due to the low Ph value of landfill’s leachate. 4) Methane Fermentation Phase: A group of microorganisms convert the acetic acids and hydrogen gas to methane and carbon dioxide. The microbes responsible for this reaction are called methanogenic or methanogens. The Ph values, due to methanogenic reaction, will rise to more natural values in the range of (6.8-8). The BOD5 and COD values of the landfill’s leachate will be reduced. Also, the concentration of heavy metals in the landfill’s leachate will drop [9]. 5) Maturation Phase: This phase starts after the biodegradable organic material is converted to methane and carbon dioxide. The rate of landfill gas generation is reduced significantly in this phase as most of the available nutrients are removed with leachate during the methanogenic phase and the remaining substrates are slowly biodegradable. CO2 and CH4 are the primary landfill gases in this phase. Small amounts of nitrogen may be also found in the landfill gas. During maturation phase, leachate will contain humic and fulvic acids which are difficult to process biologically. The production of CH4 declines as waste organics get depleted. However, the slowly biodegradable organics generate methane for decades (e.g., cellulosic organics such as wood and paper).

E. Solid Waste Decomposition Process
Decomposition of refuse in a landfill occurs through a complex series of microbial reactions. Initial aerobic decomposition occurs producing mainly carbon dioxide and water vapor. Anaerobic decomposition begins somewhere between 2 months and 2 years after waste is placed in the landfill. Hydrolytic and fermentative microorganisms convert complex organic materials (such as food and garden waste, and paper products), to intermediate carboxylic acids, particularly acetic acid, alcohols, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide. Acetogenic bacteria produce acetate, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide from longer-chain carboxylic acids and alcohols. The end reaction is the production by methanogenic to bacteria of methane [10].

F. Landfill Leachate
Leachate is a liquid that has percolated through solid waste and has extracted, dissolved, and suspended materials that may include potentially harmful materials. The type of solid waste, physical, chemical, and biological activities that occur in the solid waste determines the quality of leachate. The quantity of leachate seeping from the landfill is proportional to the buildup of leachate within the landfill, alternatively called leachate mound. Leachate can cause serious problems since it able to transport contaminating materials that may cause a contamination of soil, groundwater and surface water.

G. Leachate Management Systems
The management of leachate is the key to eliminating potential landfill problems. A number of specific practices have been used to manage the leachate collected from landfill sites. These techniques include: 1)Leachate recirculation: An effective method for the treatment of the leachate is to collect and recirculate the leachate through the landfill. During the early stages of landfill operations, the leachate will contain significant amounts of TDS, BOD, COD, and heavy metals. When leachate is recirculated, biological, physical and chemical reactions will occur and provide treatment for BOD. The recirculation of leachate provides the landfill with various nutrients, which are required for the growth of bacteria that participate in anaerobic degradation of the waste. Leachate recirculation will increase a landfill’s moisture content. Moisture is essential for the activities of all microorganisms because it serves as a medium for transporting nutrients and bacteria. During leachate recirculation, the leachate is returned to a lined landfill for reinfiltration into the municipal solid waste. This is considered a method of leachate control because as the leachate continues to flow through the landfill it is treated through biological processes, precipitation, and sorption. This process also benefits the landfill by increasing the moisture content, which in turn increases the rate of biological degradation in the landfill, the biological stability of the landfill, and the rate of methane recovery from the landfill [11]. 2) Leachate evaporation: One of the simplest techniques that can be used as a leachate management system is leachate evaporation. It involves the use of lined leachate evaporation ponds. Leachate that is not evaporated is sprayed on the completed portions of the landfill. In some locations with high rainfall, the lined leachate storage facility is covered with geomembrane during the winter season to exclude rainfall. Odorous gases that may accumulate under the surface cover are vented to a compost or soil filter. 3 ) Leachate treatment: A number of options have been used for the treatment of leachate. The treatment process selected will depend on the contaminants to be removed. The principal biological, physical and chemical treatment options used for the treatment of leachate include: * Activated sludge, responsible for the removal of organics * Nitrifications, responsible for the removal of nitrogen * Neutralization, responsible for Ph control * Precipitations, responsible for the removal of metals and some anions * Ion exchange, responsible for the removal of dissolved inorganics 4 ) Leachate characteristics: * Young Leachate: Landfill’s leachate contains a biodegradable organic matter for the first few years [12]. Therefore, this young leachate tends to be acidic due to the presence of volatile fatty acids. The Ph is generally in the range of 6 to 7 and may be lower in a dry-stressed landfills. The young leachate is derived from processes such as the complex biodegradation of organics (e.g., cellulose) and simple dissolved organics (e.g., organic acids). Gradually, leachate becomes less strong and simply dissolved organics (e.g., gases CH4, CO2, H2, H2O and biomass)[9]. * Old Leachate: The Ph of landfill’s leachate will increase to the range of 7 to 8 due to the depletion of the biodegradable organics and the production of gases. The changes occur after 4 to 5 years of waste deposited in the landfill. The Nitrogen level will indicate the age of the leachate. Ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) and organic nitrogen (Org-N) are produced by the decomposition of organic and are stable in the anaerobic environment. Nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) will be consumed during the anaerobic reaction [9].

H. Methods Of Leachate Recirculation
Leachate recirculation is one of the emerging techniques that can be used to manage leachate from landfill. Leachate should always be controlled, treated, or contained before it is released to the environment. During leachate recirculation, the leachate is returned to a lined landfill for reinfiltration into the municipal solid waste. This is considered a method of leachate control because as the leachate continues to flow through the landfill, it is treated through biological processes, precipitations and sorption [13]. This process also benefits the landfill by increasing the moisture content which in turn increases the rate of biological degradation in the landfill, the biological stability of the landfill, and the rate of methane recovery from the landfill. There are several methods of leachate recirculation. These include: 1) Direct application to the waste during disposal:
In this process, the leachate is added to the incoming solid waste while its being unloaded, deposited, and compacted. The problems with this method include odor problems, health risks due to exposure, and off-site migration due to drift. This method also requires a leachate storage facility for periods such as high winds, rainfall, and landfill shutdown when the leachate cannot be applied. 2) Spray Irrigation of landfill surface: The leachate is applied to the landfill surface in the same method that irrigation water is applied to the crops. This method is beneficial because it allows the leachate to be applied to a larger portion of the landfill. Also, the leachate volume is reduced due to evaporation. However, the disadvantages associated with direct application are associated with this method as well. 3) Surface application:This is achieved through ponding or spreading the leachate. The ponds are generally formed in landfill areas that have been isolated with soil berms or within excavated sites in the solid wastes. The disadvantages associate with this method include an increase in the amount of required land area, monitoring of the ponds to detect seepage, leaks, and breaks that would make it possible for the leachate to escape directly or with storm water runoff. 4) Subsurface application: This method achieved throughout placing either vertical recharge wells or horizontal drains fields within the solid waste. There is a large amount of excavation and construction required with this method, but the risk of atmosphere exposure is radically reduced. Another method of leachate management is to pump out the leachate from the bottom of the landfill and store it in a large basin. The leachate is often shipped to a municipal wastewater treatment facility where it can be effectively treated. Since the concentration of leachate’s contamination is not high as that of commercial wastewater, the leachate serves as a dilutor and is consequently helpful.

I. Advantages And Disadvantages Of Leachate Recirculation

The advantages of leachate recirculation are: * Landfills that use leachate recirculation experience a decrease in the concentration of the leachate compared to landfills without recycle treatment. This reduced the amount of leachate treatment that is needed it and therefore costs are also reduced. * The increased moisture content within the solid waste enhances the system conditions for improved biological decomposition of organic matter in the landfill. * The organic matter in the leachate receives further treatment each time it recycled through the landfill. This reduced treatment costs of the landfill. * The reducing environment within the landfill removes inorganics in the leachate through precipitation and sorption. * Leachate recirculation stabilizes the biological system in the landfill and this reduced the environmental threats of the landfill, and reduces the amount of post closure mentioning that is required. It also provides the opportunity for landfill mining and space reclamation. * Leachate recirculation increases the rate at which the waste decomposes and this increases the rate of methane production. * Leachate recirculation is a leachate management method that is relatively simple and inexpensive.
The disadvantages of leachate recirculation are: * Since landfills are heterogeneous, the leachate may find discrete channels to travel through. This makes it difficult to insure that the leachate is reacting with all of the waste and is thoroughly treated. * The risk of environmental exposure when leachate is applied to the surface of a landfill.

III. COMPARISON BETWEEN A DRY TOMB AND A BIOREACTOR LANDFILL

A conventional landfill site is an engineered waste disposal facility where garbage is deposited in the ground compacted into a cell and covered with earth fill materials. Environmental controls are incorporated into the engineering design of the facility to protect both the human and natural environments.
A Bioreactor landfill uses enhanced microbiological processes to transform and stabilize the readily and moderately decomposable organic waste constituents within 5 to 10 years of bioreactor process implementation [14]. The bioreactor landfill significantly increases the extent of organic waste decomposition, conversion rates, and process effectiveness over that would otherwise occur within the landfill. Landfill stabilization means that the environmental performance measurement parameters (i.e. landfill gas composition and generation rate and leachate constituent concentrations) remain at steady levels, and should not increase in the event of any partial containment system failures beyond 5 to 10 years of bioreactor process implementation. The volume of bioreactor is smaller than the conventional landfill even after 10 years. In a conventional (dry) landfill, the wastes are delivered to the landfill, spread out, compacted and covered at the end of the day with a thin layer of soil, until a planned depth is reached, then the waste is covered with clay as a final layer. The problem with conventional-dry landfills is that it takes several decades (30-200 years) for the waste to fully decompose. Also, liner failure could happen in conventional-dry landfill sometime in future, which can cause serious groundwater contamination [15].
Studies show that Bioreactors bring about extensive reduction in organic loads. Pollution indicators like COD, BOD and DOC are reduced by 80-90% in this kind of operation. Reduction in solids content of about 50-60% is also achieved[16].

IV. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

Advantages of Bioreactor Landfill can be summarized as follows: * Enhance the LFG Generation Rates * Reduce Environmental Impact * Production of End Product that does not Need Land filling * Overall Reduction of Land filling Cost * Reduction of leachate Treatment Capital and Operation Cost * Reduction in Post-Closure care, maintenance and * Overall reduction of contaminating life span of the landfill due to a decrease in contaminant concentrations during the operating period of the bioreactor landfills

It is now time to seriously consider acceptance and adoption of the bioreactor landfill as a key strategy for deriving short and long-term environmental, regulatory, monetary and societal benefits. The bioreactor option is a direct result of engineering and building a new generation of environmentally sound landfills; it provides environmental security while permitting and encouraging rapid stabilization of the readily and moderately decomposable organic waste components[17]. It is hoped that the emerging bioreactor landfill technology will point our solid waste industry towards taking a new look at a very effective option to manage our waste disposal.

REFERENCE:

[1] Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications Tuesday, Jun 17, 2008
[2],[9] M. A. Warith, “ Solid waste management: New trends in landfill design”, emirates journal for engineering research, 8 (1), 61-70 (2003)
[3] Reinhart, D.R, McCreanor, P.T. and Townsend, T. “The bioreactor landfill – its status and future”, Waste Management and Research, ISWA, No.30, pp. 172 – 186 (2002).
[4] Pohland, FG. “Landfill Bioreactors: Historical Perspective, Fundamental Principals, and New Horizons in Design and Operation”, EPA/600/R-95/146:9-24. 1995.
[5] McCreanor, PT, and Reinhart, D R.Hydrodynamic Modeling of Leachate Recirculation Landfills”, Water Science and Technology, 34 (7-8): 463-470. 1996.
[6],[16] Swati. M, O. P. Karthikeyan, Kurian Joseph and R. Nagendran, “‘Landfill Bioreactor’: a biotechnological solution for waste Management”, Centre for Environmental Studies, Anna University, Chennai.
[7] Carven, W, Vogel. K, “Field Investigation of Landfill Leachate Collection System.” Research project by Florida Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management. pp.1-9. 1999.
[8]Rovers, F., Grahame, J. “Solid Waste Landfill Engineering and Design”, Prentice Hall Inc, New Jersey. 1995.
[10] Hudgins, M, “The Development and Evolution of In-Situ composing of Landfill Waste.”, Conference on Solid Waste Technology and Management, Philadelphia. 1999.
[11] Warith, MA, “Bioreactor Landfills: Experimental and Field Results.”, Waste Management, Vol.22(1): pp17-17. 2002.
[12] Mcbean, E, Poland, R “Leachate Collection Design for Containment Landfills.” Environmental Engineering J. pp. 204-2091995.
[13] Warith, MA, and Zekry, W and Gawri, N. “Effect of Leachate Recirculation on Municipal Solid Waste Biodegradation.” Water Quality Research J. of Canada, Vol. 34(2): pp 267-280. 1999.
[14] McCreanor, PT, and Reinhart, DR. “Hydrodynamic Modeling of Leachate Recirculation Landfills”, Water Science and Technology, 34 (7-8): 463-470. 1996.
[15] Rosenberg, D. “Turning Waste into Energy.”, Environmental 2000. Engineering journal, New Jersey. pp. 124-152.
[17] Sneha Gupta, Narendra Choudhary and Babu J. Alappat, “Bioreactor Landfill for MSW Disposal in Delhi”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management, 5 - 7 September 2007, Chennai, India. pp.474-481

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Waste Management

...DEVELOPING INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN TRAINING MANUAL Volume 4: ISWM Plan U N I T E D N AT I O N S E N V I R O N M E N T P R O G R A M M E Copyright © United Nations Environment Programme, 2009 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Disclaimer The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Moreover, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the decision or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, nor does citing of trade names or commercial processes constitute endorsement. Developing Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan Training Manual Volume 4 ISWM Plan Compiled by United Nations Environmental Programme Division of Technology, Industry and Economics International Environmental...

Words: 18353 - Pages: 74

Free Essay

Oil Palm

...Energy 34 (2009) 1225–1235 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/energy Oil palm biomass as a sustainable energy source: A Malaysian case study S.H. Shuit, K.T. Tan, K.T. Lee*, A.H. Kamaruddin School of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Engineering Campus, Seri Ampangan, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Received 24 October 2008 Received in revised form 13 May 2009 Accepted 14 May 2009 Available online 13 June 2009 It has been widely accepted worldwide that global warming is by far the greatest threat and challenge in the new millennium. In order to stop global warming and to promote sustainable development, renewable energy is a perfect solution to achieve both targets. Presently million hectares of land in Malaysia is occupied with oil palm plantation generating huge quantities of biomass. In this context, biomass from oil palm industries appears to be a very promising alternative as a source of raw materials including renewable energy in Malaysia. Thus, this paper aims to present current scenario of biomass in Malaysia covering issues on availability and sustainability of feedstock as well as current and possible utilization of oil palm biomass. This paper will also discuss feasibility of some biomass conversion technologies and some ongoing projects in Malaysia related to utilization of oil palm biomass as...

Words: 10699 - Pages: 43

Premium Essay

Bioenergy Technology Development in Nigeria – Pathway to Sustainable Development

...Bioenergy Technology Development in Nigeria – Pathway to Sustainable Development TERM PAPER SUBMITTED BY ATTABO, AMEH M.Engr Mechnical Engineering Covenant university ota Nigeria ABSTRACT A major factor affecting Nigeria’s economical progress is power. And this has been a major discuss in the country for a long time. A reliable and sustainable energy source is greatly desired to power the nation’s economy and this need cannot be overemphasized, due to the epileptic power supply to the national grid, it has become absolutely important to explore other cheap sources of power to meet our urban and rural energy need. This will in no small measure support our national grid and reduce rural-urban drift. The heavy dependence on gas generated by the Nigeria National Petroleum Co-operation (NNPC) to power our turbines at our gas plants often exposes the country to power outage due to high cost of maintenance and vandalism. Applying biomass technology to generate power can help the country develop its energy sector more rapidly as the raw material needed to feed the Bioenergy plants are almost everywhere in the country some are mere waste such as agricultural and domestic waste. The focus of this paper is on the use of bioenergy to alleviate the poverty rate in Nigeria especially in the rural areas where there is large amount of Lands and biomass material. Developing the bioenergy strength of the country also creates wealth and employment...

Words: 7763 - Pages: 32

Free Essay

Technologies for Alternative Energy

...Technologies for Alternative Energy Climate Change Working Paper No. 7 Ainsley Jolley Climate Change Project Working Paper Series March 2006 Centre for Strategic Economic Studies Victoria University PO Box 14428 Melbourne VIC 8001 AUSTRALIA Telephone +613 9919 1340 Fax +613 9919 1350 Email: csesinfo@vu.edu.au Website: http://www.cfses.com Technologies for Alternative Energy 1. Introduction In Papers 5 and 6 technologies for the main sources of energy consumption were discussed. In Papers 7 and 8 the attention is focussed on technologies that impact on emissions from energy production. Table 1 provides data on the main sources of GHG emissions in the advanced economies for the year 2000. Table 1. Sources of GHG Emissions in the Advanced Economies, 2000 Source of emissions Electricity and heat production Petroleum refining Other energy production (coal and gas transformation) Fugitive emissions (coal, oil and gas) Total energy production All sources of emissions Note: (a) energy production as % of all sources of emissions. Source: CSES (2004). Tg CO2 -e 3831.2 420.7 324.6 441.5 5018.1 13175.3 % of total 76.3 8.4 6.5 8.8 38.1 (a) Papers 7 and 8 focus on emissions from the production of electricity and heat, which represent 76.3% of all emissions related to energy production. The other sources of emissions are not discussed in detail in this report. Coverage of the issues relating to these sources of emissions is given in CSES (2004). Incremental technological...

Words: 30324 - Pages: 122

Premium Essay

Nanotechnology Applications for Clean Water Solutions for Improving

...NaNotechNology applicatioNs for cleaN Water Micro & NaNo TechNologies series editor: Jeremy ramsden Professor of Nanotechnology Microsystems and Nanotechnology Centre, Department of Materials Cranfield University, United Kingdom the aim of this book series is to disseminate the latest developments in small scale technologies with a particular emphasis on accessible and practical content. these books will appeal to engineers from industry, academia and government sectors. for more information about the book series and new book proposals please contact the publisher, Dr. Nigel hollingworth at nhollingworth@williamandrew.com. http://www.williamandrew.com/MNt NaNotechNology applicatioNs for cleaN Water edited by Nora savage Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency and (in alphabetical order) Mamadou Diallo Materials and process simulation center, Division of chemistry and chemical engineering, california institute of technology Jeremiah Duncan Nanoscale Science and Engineering Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison anita street Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency and Center of Advanced Materials for the Purification of Water with Systems, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign richard sustich N o r w i c h , N Y, U S A copyright © 2009 by William andrew inc. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying...

Words: 90139 - Pages: 361

Free Essay

Doing Business in Vietnam

...INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 2008. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. • • • • • • • • • • Chapter 1: Doing Business In Vietnam Chapter 2: Political and Economic Environment Chapter 3: Selling U.S. Products and Services Chapter 4: Leading Sectors for U.S. Export and Investment Chapter 5: Trade Regulations and Standards Chapter 6: Investment Climate Chapter 7: Trade and Project Financing Chapter 8: Business Travel Chapter 9: Contacts, Market Research and Trade Events Chapter 10: Guide to Our Services 3/3/2009 Return to table of contents Chapter 1: Doing Business in Vietnam • • • • Market Overview Market Challenges Market Opportunities Market Entry Strategy Market Overview Return to top • Vietnam is a true emerging market, offering ground floor and growing opportunities for U.S. exporters and investors. Vietnam’s economic growth rate has been among the highest in the world in recent years, expanding annually at 7-8.5 percent, while industrial production has been growing at around 14-15 percent per year. Vietnam’s macroeconomic challenges and the global financial crisis dampened this growth in 2008 and will continue to do so in 2009. • In response to significant macroeconomic challenges, including high inflation and a large and growing current account deficit, the Government of Vietnam (GVN) implemented a series of fiscal and monetary tightening...

Words: 50261 - Pages: 202

Premium Essay

Tata

...for U.S. Companies INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT, U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 2011. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. • • • • • • • • • • Chapter 1: Doing Business in Vietnam Chapter 2: Political and Economic Environment Chapter 3: Selling U.S. Products and Services Chapter 4: Leading Sectors for U.S. Export and Investment Chapter 5: Trade Regulations, Customs and Standards Chapter 6: Investment Climate Chapter 7: Trade and Project Financing Chapter 8: Business Travel Chapter 9: Contacts, Market Research and Trade Events Chapter 10: Guide to Our Services Return to table of contents Chapter 1: Doing Business in Vietnam • • • • Market Overview Market Challenges Market Opportunities Market Entry Strategy Return to top Market Overview • Vietnam is a true emerging market, offering ground floor and growing opportunities for U.S. exporters and investors. Vietnam’s economic growth rate has been among the highest in the world in recent years, expanding at an average about 7.2 percent per year during the period 2001-2010, while industrial production grew at an average of about 12 percent per year during the same period. Vietnam registered GDP growth rate of 6.7 percent in 2010 and was one of only a handful of countries around the world to experience such levels of economic growth. Moving forward, inflation remains a main risk to Vietnam’s economy, which the Government of Vietnam (GVN) is addressing by balancing growth targets...

Words: 52699 - Pages: 211

Free Essay

Tanner Industry-Waste Treatment

...MEDITERRANEAN Pollution prevention opportunities in the Tanning sector industry CLEANER within the mediterranean region production Regional Activity Centre for Cleaner Production (RAC/CP) Mediterranean Action Plan Ministry of the Environment Spain Autonomous Government of Catalonia Ministry of the Environment Centre for Cleaner Production Initiatives Pollution Prevention Opportunities in the Tanning Sector Industry within the Mediterranean Region Note: This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form of educational and non-profit purposes without special permission from the Regional Activity Centre for Cleaner Production (RAC/CP), provided acknowledgement of the source is made. RAC/CP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this material as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purposes whatsoever without prior permission in writing from RAC/CP. If you consider that some part of this study could be improved or there is any lack of precision, we would appreciate if you could notify it to us. Study finished on January 2000 Study published on October 2000 Additional copies or information could be requested to: Regional Activity Centre for Cleaner Production (RAC/CP) C/ París, 184 – 3ª planta 08036 Barcelona (Spain) Tf. (+34) 93 415 11 12 - Fax (+34) 93 237 02 86 e-mail: cleanpro@cema-sa.org Web page: http://www.cema-sa.org Page 1 of 162 Pollution...

Words: 36551 - Pages: 147

Free Essay

Business

...state and Washington DC, June 2011 trends of the 2011 state and trends of the 2011 Environment Department This report was prepared by a World Bank team comprising of Nicholas Linacre, Alexandre Kossoy and Philippe Ambrosi, with important contributions from Manelle Aït Sahlia, Veronique Bishop, Benoît Bosquet, Christophe de Gouvello, Taisei Matsuki and Monali Ranade. 2 | State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2010 New Approach for the 2011 Report With the goal of providing a comprehensive discussion of the issues that most affected the carbon market in 2010, the authors of last year’s report have restructured State and Trends of the Carbon Market for 2011. The report still provides an overview of the size and reach of the carbon markets, as well as the evolution of the Kyoto flexibility mechanisms, and offers potential supply/demand scenarios for coming years. However, it no longer includes a detailed breakdown of carbon transactions, as in previous years. Instead, the report provides a more in-depth analytical discussion of the regulation and policy issues that will guide future carbon market development. The findings and opinions expressed in this report are the sole responsibility of the authors and should not be cited without permission. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank Group, its Executive Directors, the countries they represent or of any of the participants in the carbon funds or facilities managed by the World Bank. The World Bank does...

Words: 41282 - Pages: 166

Free Essay

As, Ca, Pdf

...ISSUES FOR IIM INTERVIEW  PROCESS © EssaysforIIM.com 2014-15 Issues for IIM PI Process http://www.essaysforIIM.com   Contents  US‐CHINA ENVIRONMENT DEAL  8  OIL PRICE  9  PAYMENT BANKS  11  SHADOW BANKING  13  NBFCs  14  NEW DEFINITION OF FDI  16  REFORMS IN POWER DISTRIBUTION  16  SECURITIES LAWS (AMENDMENT) BILL 2014  18  JUVENILE JUSTICE BILL, 2014  18  HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON  19  INEQUALITY  20  SOCIO‐ECONOMIC PROFILE OF STATES AND INTER‐STATE COMPARISONS  21  ASER 2013: Main Findings  23  SKILL DEVELOPMENT  24  HOW INDIA NEEDS TO FACE CLIMATE CHANGE  24  AGENDA FOR ECONOMIC REFORMS  28  INFRASTRUCTURE  30  WHY LONG‐RUN MATTERS  30  FIVE PRONGED STRATEGY TO CONTROL INFLATION  31  URJIT PATEL COMMITTEE  32  Some Major Issues in India's Merchandise Trade Sector  32  MAKE IN INDIA OPPORTUNITY  34  Make for India or Make in India – The debate begins!  37  VULNERABILITY COMPARISON OF INDIAN ECONOMY  38  PM JAN DHAN YOJANA  39  COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM  40  ZERO DEFECT, ZERO EFFECT  41  DIGITAL INDIA  42  TWO FACTOR IDENTIFICATION ISSUE  43  MINSK AGREEMENT  44  WILFUL DEFAULT  44  © EssaysforIIM.com 2014‐15   Page 1 Issues for IIM PI Process http://www.essaysforIIM.com   ‘MAKE IN INDIA’  ...

Words: 128478 - Pages: 514

Premium Essay

Future of Technology

...THE FUTURE OF TECHNOLOGY OTHER ECONOMIST BOOKS Guide to Analysing Companies Guide to Business Modelling Guide to Business Planning Guide to Economic Indicators Guide to the European Union Guide to Financial Markets Guide to Management Ideas Numbers Guide Style Guide Dictionary of Business Dictionary of Economics International Dictionary of Finance Brands and Branding Business Consulting Business Ethics Business Strategy China’s Stockmarket Globalisation Headhunters and How to Use Them Successful Mergers Wall Street Essential Director Essential Economics Essential Finance Essential Internet Essential Investment Essential Negotiation Pocket World in Figures THE FUTURE OF TECHNOLOGY THE ECONOMIST IN ASSOCIATION WITH PROFILE BOOKS LTD Published by Profile Books Ltd 3a Exmouth House, Pine Street, London ec1r 0jh Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Ltd 2005 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. The greatest care has been taken in compiling this book. However, no responsibility can be accepted by the publishers or compilers for the accuracy of the information presented. Where opinion is expressed it is that of the author and does not necessarily...

Words: 128899 - Pages: 516