...forensic technologies make possible to resolve even the most challenging crimes. This paper tells a story of Ted Bundy, a serial killer, whose case was solved with the help of forensic science. Implications and possible changes in case investigation are proposed. Keywords: forensic science, Ted Bundy, serial killer, case, solve. The Ted Bundy Case Forensic science is at the heart of all crime investigation procedures. Recent advances in forensic science make possible to solve even the most challenging cases. The contribution of forensic science to crime investigation is difficult to overestimate: according to Ribaux, Walsh and Margot (2006), forensic science facilitates accreditation, standardization, and interpretation of forensic evidence and ensures the scientific efficiency and objectivity of crime data. The case of Ted Bundy, a serial killer, is no exception: it is with the help of forensic science that the crimes committed by Ted Bundy were solved. The story of Ted Bundy is believed to have started between 1973 and 1974, when he committed his first murders. In just two years, Bundy managed to kill almost two dozens of girls (Ramsland, n.d.). Victims’ age ranged from 12 to 20; some of them were reported to be missing, whereas others vanished from their rooms, leaving mattresses and clothes drenched in blood (Ramsland, n.d.). They were later found in remote places, such as forests and wooded hillsides. Bundy was extremely creative in his murders: he never left fingerprints...
Words: 854 - Pages: 4
...Despite the advantages that Odontology has provided, it has come with its’ own set of controversy, centering around bite mark analysis. In recent years critics have begun to speculate about the nature of bite-mark analysis. Rather than deduce based on the bite mark itself, forensic dentists often get as much information as possible about the suspected biter before performing the analysis. This might lead them to look for evidence that isn't actually there to fit the need. In addition, forensic dentists have given juries the impression that bite marks are as unique as fingerprints and/or DNA, but they're not. Despite what may be popular in culture today, there is no evidence to show that you can state that an individual was responsible for a...
Words: 312 - Pages: 2
...which were necessary to establishing chain of custody. To avoid this result the police should always properly document the evidence and who has control of the evidence by using badge numbers and names on the forms provided for the evidence. Case 4 The defendant did intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly cause bodily injury to Shelby Hooper by biting her.At trial, the State introduced evidence that the police were dispatched to a hotel room that had recently been the scene of an altercation between appellant and Hooper. Hysterical and crying, Hooper told the officers that appellant had struck her with his fists and bitten her. Consistent with Hooper's statements, officers observed a cut on her lip and bite marks on her back and buttocks. After admitting, during questioning, that he had hit Hooper in the head with a closed fist, appellant was arrested. Hooper testified for the defense. She stated that she had provided the police with a misleading picture of what really occurred on the evening of the alleged assault. With regard to the allegation that appellant hit her with his hand, she claimed that she was the aggressor that evening and that appellant was simply defending himself. With regard to the bite allegation, she denied that she was bitten on August 9th and claimed that the bite marks on her body were actually the result of “love bites” that were a part of consensual sexual activity occurring on the prior evening. The issue with the case is that police and...
Words: 308 - Pages: 2
...Ted Bundy Theodore Robert “Ted” was born on November 24, 1946. His mother lived with her parents, which created a confusing perception in Ted as a kid. He believed his grandparents were his parents and his mother was his older sister. As Ted grew his mom move out and married Johnny Culpepper Bundy. Ted took his stepfather’s last name and so his new name came out to be “Ted Bundy”. Ted Bundy was known for his smartness, charisma, and good persona personality. Many believed he would make it far based how much he was improving in his academic fields, but many did not know what the obscure side of Ted was capable of. Ted Bundy while growing up would live with confused believes about his own family structure, after his mother married Johnny Bundy; Ted Bundy isolated from his family and did not spend much time with them. In school people knew him as a shy kid. When Ted made it college he met a wealthy girl named “Stephanie Brook”, the reason of why Ted picked victims with similar characteristics to her. Stephanie graduated and terminated her relationship with Ted Bundy abruptly leaving a man with a heart broken and also with a thirst for revenge. Ted Bundy began his revenge by improving in academic fields and making a name for himself. He expanded his knowledge by learning Chinese, enrolling in politics, and studied law. Ted Bundy began a new relationship with Stephanie Brooks and broke up with her after having proposed, it was a revenge done by Ted Bundy for what Stephanie...
Words: 653 - Pages: 3
...science, which deals with the handling, examination, and presentation of dental evidence in court. From studying the teeth the information that one is expected to no would usually involve in identifying that person, the age of the victim and if there were any signs of violence. Several different records will help identify them. Such as, dental records they could include photographs, even radiography, as well as ante mortem and post mortem reports. The forensics job is to study any bite marks that might be on the victim, and identify any human remains. Bite mark history has been around for years, as far back as 66 AD, which was the time of Nero, which is amazing that a young dentist helped my families identify war casualties. The U.S. developed a universal system that assigned a number to each tooth also the surfaces are also classified and the Gustafson method, which was looking for, six signs of wear or the Lamendin method looking at the roots. When you go to your dentist, she or he keeps a lot of information on your teeth. For example if you have fillings, if you have had teeth pulled out and which ones, they will note the structure of your teeth if you have any twisted or crooked. When talking about bite marks this is a new process, it began around the 70’s at this time officers started to see that criminals had left bite marks, cigarettes or even food. There are seven different kinds of bite marks that are classified as 4th...
Words: 272 - Pages: 2
...Evidence Tracking Properly handling evidence is critical to crime solving, improper deviations to the handling can make it impossible to prosecute using the evidence collected. This paper will outline will track the evidence from a chosen crime scene through all the proper handling processes. This paper will describe the chosen crime scene scenario, describe the collected evidence and proper collection, recording of the evidence, chain of evidence, processing, interpretation methods, preservation of the evidence, proper presentation methods for different types of evidence, and the consequences of mishandling the evidence collected. The Crime and Processing Protocols The chosen crime scene scenario is a sexual assault; the first responding officer will have been notified of a possible rape and traveled to an apartment complex at 306 Timber Road, Apartment 12-B to investigate. Upon arrival, the first crime scene procedure is to make sure the crime scene is safe and the possible offender has been arrested or is no longer on the scene. If the struggle were still occurring, this would be the point to render aid. The next procedure would be to determine the extent of the crime and to secure the scene from intrusion to preserve any evidence. It is important for the responding officer to keep their superiors informed of their activities. At this point the responding officer will touch nothing and document all of their observations and actions, if the scene had been disturbed in any...
Words: 1515 - Pages: 7
...to identify someone. DNA matches were discussed in a way that more often than not confused the jury, or was interpreted incorrectly. My final controversy is over a man named Roy Brown who was convicted of murder in 1992 and released in 2007. Brown was released after a DNA analysis showed that the saliva left behind on the dead body matched with a different suspect! There was a bite mark in the Brown case that showed tooth impressions from the front teeth of the upper jaw, but Brown was missing two teeth at the time. The expert witness claimed that Brown could have moved the skin of the victim around when biting to make it appear that he wasn't missing any teeth. Although this testimony was not the only evidence used by the prosecution, it was necessary in helping jurors reach a guilty verdict. Cases like these have led critics to speculate about the nature of the bite-mark analysis. Forensic Scientists may be giving juries the impression that bite marks are as unique fingerprints or DNA – and they’re not. There is no evidence to show that you can state that an individual was responsible for a bite mark with complete certainty. ...
Words: 546 - Pages: 3
...CRJ 311 Entire Course (Ash) FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.crj311nerd.com CRJ 311 Week 1 Assignment The CSI Effect CRJ 311 Week 1 DQ 1 Peer Review CRJ 311 Week 1 DQ 2 Your First Scene CRJ 311 Week 1 Journal You're an Expert! CRJ 311 Week 2 Assignment Conducting Your Own Field Sobriety Test CRJ 311 Week 2 DQ 1 Drugs and Scheduling CRJ 311 Week 2 DQ 2 Field Sobriety Tests CRJ 311 Week 2 Journal SANE or Not CRJ 311 Week 3 Assignment Case Study Analysis The Enrique Camarena Case CRJ 311 Week 3 DQ 1 Hair Evidence CRJ 311 Week 3 DQ 2 Arson Dogs CRJ 311 Week 3 Journal Professional Painter CRJ 311 Week 4 Assignment What's Your Impression CRJ 311 Week 4 DQ 1 Bite Mark Evidence CRJ 311 Week 4 DQ 2 Fingerprint Evidence CRJ 311 Week 4 Journal Cold Case Investigation CRJ 311 Week 5 DQ 1 Blood Patterns CRJ 311 Week 5 DQ 2 DNA Evidence CRJ 311 Week 5 Final Paper CRJ 311 Week 5 Journal Cold Case Investigation ======================================================== CRJ 311 Week 1 Assignment The CSI Effect (Ash) FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT www.crj311nerd.com Read “Fact or Fiction?; The Jury is Still Out on the CSI Effect; A TV-Insprired Interest in Forensics Has Left the Courtroom Vulnerable to Junk Science,” which is located in the ProQuest database in the Ashford Online Library. What is the CSI Effect, and do you believe it is a legitimate concern? In your paper, address the following: Summarize the CSI Effect and evaluate if it is a legitimate concern. ...
Words: 3613 - Pages: 15
...Tikki is a courageous character in the story, I know this because it states in paragraph 29,”He bit, indeed, but did not bite long enough, and he jumped clear of the whisking tail, leaving Nagaina torn and angry.” This shows that Rikki TIkki was brave enough to bite the snake’s head when he could’ve been bitten. His character trait helps demonstrate the thesis, because Rikki Tikki tried to fight off the snakes to save his friends. For instance, it states in the text, “Well,”...
Words: 643 - Pages: 3
...There were issues with the victim being intoxicated and how this could have hindered her ability to identify the assailant. Plus there was little scientific evidence because there was just a bite mark. A forensic odontologist made the claim that he would be able to identify the attacker based solely on a bite mark. This forensic odontologist stated that Jeffery is linked to the bite mark. The scientific evidence turned out to be junk science and did not prove that Jeffery was indeed guilty. Marlinga wrote a post-conviction motion to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court granted the right to a new trial. Additionally, the proposal brought up some questions which caused Judge Malinga to be judged by his peers, and this ultimately leads to Marlinga being wrongfully convicted based on Carl allowing his campaign contribution change his judgment. As a result, he had to go to trial and was found not guilty. This lead Carl to understand how it feels to be wrongfully convicted. Furthermore, Carl ended up not running as a probate judge...
Words: 553 - Pages: 3
...a man in a black ski mask, dressed in a sweat suit struggling with the victim. This witness’ dog attacked the man, biting him on the left calf. After Law Enforcement Officers arrived a shoeprint was found at the scene, unfolding a 1980’s Montalvo shoe which was no longer produced. When CJ Nicholas started to investigate District Attorney Mark Hunter’s recent convictions, Nicholas took his story to his editor to pitch a fraud story on DA Hunter. Nicholas argued with his editor that most of Hunter’s high profile cases were false convictions. In the case before the murder of the prostitute, Nicholas tries to prove that a cigarette butt is the only thing linking the accused murdered to this crime. No shoeprints, no DNA, no weapon. Just a cigarette butt, Nicholas argued, why if anything, would the accused murderer leave no trace in evidence but overlook his cigarette. The editor denied the story, informing Nicholas and his partner Corey Finley that their investigation series is shutting down due to low ratings. Within the crime of the prostitute murder, the main characters Nicholas and Finley did not truly manipulate the evidence, whereas Nicholas and Finley decided to document and video tape this certain murder to prove that Hunter is falsely convicting innocent people. Nicholas and Finley started by buying the weapon, the two proceeding to walk into a gun store while Finley was secretly filming, Nicholas bought a white handle switchblade. In order to prove that the...
Words: 964 - Pages: 4
...morning the Senior Manager mentions that he has been reading a book on Business Law, in which he found this sentence; “Not all agreements are legally binding. The courts will only enforce agreements that have certain key ‘ingredients’.” Recalling that you claim to have covered this topic on your course, from this starting point he asks you to write him a briefing note to explain the importance of the ‘essential elements’ required for the formation of a valid contract. 1.2 Another day he invites you to think about three different ways to make agreements with hotel customers; (a) agreeing verbally to stay in a room; (b) signing printed terms at reception; and (c) clicking on the hotel website and buying online. Edexcel HND Unit 5 ACNB – BITE September 2014 page 1 of 8 He then asks you to...
Words: 2725 - Pages: 11
...by Business Insider examines the pitfalls of the justice system that led to Gerard Richardson’s wrongful conviction. Richardson spent 19 years in prison for the 1994 murder of Monica Reyes before DNA testing proved his innocence. He became a suspect after law enforcement learned that Reyes, who was addicted to heroin, had sold drugs for Richardson on a few occasions to support her habit and owed him approximately $90. Richardson’s conviction was based largely on the testimony of a forensic dentist who claimed that a bite mark on the victim’s body matched Richardson’s teeth. Harrington suggests that Richardson’s conviction is evidence of a failing justice system. He writes: We still have gaping holes in our structure that we euphemistically refer to as “cracks” where citizens fall through and have their lives and the lives of their loved ones destroyed. Very few people are arguing for change in our judicial process or the need for more compiling evidence before sentencing. We need to reevaluate the entire system before we send even one more person to prison with the question of undeniable guilt still unanswered. We as a society have executed the innocent, falsely imprisoned the righteous and damned the unworthy, without so much as a cry for a more precise system. Are we so in fear of our population that we would rather send an innocent man to prison than take the time necessary to develop a system that never uses questionable eyewitness testimony or less than exact scientific...
Words: 288 - Pages: 2
...[week 1 individual work] | Forensic scientists do much more than process, analyze and compare evidence. The scientist must be qualified as an expert witness. Your individual work will explore the question, "What is an expert witness?" | The Supreme Court in the 1960’s wanted police to place a greater need on finding evidence that was scientifically evaluated. This led to a growth in the forensic laboratory department. Drug abuse and DNA profiling are also a reason the growth has happened. While the growth of crime and drug use has rocketed, so has the technology used to identify a person as well as the chance to identify a drug and what it is used for or where it was made. Drug abuse cases still outnumber DNA cases, but the DNA experts have made it possible to identify someone based on a bloodstain, semen stains, hair and saliva residues left behind on stamps, cups, bite marks and so on (Saferstein, 2009). Different communities offer different services based on the employees they have and what their experience is in. This is because of the variation in local laws, different capabilities and functions of the organization to which the laboratory is attached and budget and staffing limitations. This is the reason for independent laboratories. Some scientists that work for these laboratories are required to testify about the methods used and conclusions to the evidence at a trial or hearing. When this happens, they have to be considered an expert witness; they could...
Words: 550 - Pages: 3
...All of these activities are illegal in most parts of the world today although, some people continue doing it. Pitbulls actually used to be America's most popular family dog because they have excellent temperament and are easily trained. Because of the past with fighting and aggressiveness some people are pushed to believe that pitbulls are dangerous dogs and that they should not be bred or sold anymore. Most people that have these bad thoughts about pitbulls are just afraid of them but they aren’t actually speaking facts. Pitbulls are not naturally harmful dogs. One of the reasons that Pitbulls are seen as mean or viscous is because there's a myth that states, they have an unusual strong jaw and people say that their jaw locks when they bite onto something although “ We found that the American pitbull terriers did not have any unique mechanism that would allow these dogs to lock their jaws...” (Brisbin). Studies have shown that there are other breeds of dogs that are much stronger than pitbulls. Pitbulls are considered to be medium strength and there are other dogs that are much stronger such as german shepherds, bullmastiff, doberman pinscher, etc. Because of that it shows that there are many other dogs that will do worse damage than pitbulls if they are trained improperly. People have a fear that they have a massive biting power of 1,000 pounds of pressure per square inch. That is not possible because “ Scientists consistently use the unit Newtons to quantify force, not pounds...
Words: 1446 - Pages: 6
