Free Essay

Blame on Nothingness - Vertigo

In: English and Literature

Submitted By mamania
Words 3079
Pages 13
Nia Nguyen

A Blame on Nothing and Nothingness
Abject: A Rereading of Vertigo

“In a male libidinal economy… the only good woman is a dead woman.” Slavoj Zizek, A Pervert’s Guide to Cinema

Robin Wood began his landmark studies, Hitchcock’s Films (1965), with the rhetorical question, “Why should we take Hitchcock seriously?” Yet it was also Wood himself who revised the question in 1983. He asks, “Can Hitchcock be saved for feminism?” While there is no denying the brilliance of Hitchcock’s subjective camera and his skillful manipulation of identification processes, one cannot help but loathe the pungent misogyny prevalent in his works. Vertigo (1958) is arguably no exception. Laura Mulvey, a vocal and influential feminist film critic, contends that Vertigo elucidates an active sadistic voyeurism of the male gaze that subjects the woman, as object-of-desire, to realize his impossible fantasy, time and again at the cost of brutish violence against her body and psychological wellness.[1] Also exploiting Freud’s theory, Tania Modleski deciphers female suffering in Vertigo as a punishment for her inherently close relationship with the mother with which the men envy.[2] In drawing on the phallocentric models of Freud and Lacan, these criticisms bear a blind spot in that they assume certain essentialist sexual development characteristics to formulate the backbone of their analysis, such as Mulvey’s reading of object-of-desire or Modleski’s draw on bisexuality. In order to fairly assess if the nature of violence in Vertigo is misogynistic, I seek a language that is not inherently phallocentric. And while Lacan offers a comparatively more structuralist framework, I find his psychological development theory inadequate to address fully the transition between development stages and the mechanism for regression, for which I perceive as very complex in Vertigo. Therefore, I propose a rereading of Vertigo through the scope of structuralist Julia Kristeva’s theory of abjection to account for this lack of gender neutrality and development fluidity. In so doing, I seek to provide a closer examination into the psychological well-being of Scottie and the motives behind his actions, thus assessing the claims of violent assaults to women in Vertigo. According to Kristeva in Powers of Horror, the “abject” is neither an object nor subject. It draws our attention toward the place where meaning collapses, thus “disturb(ing) identity, system, order…the in-between, the ambiguous, the composite”[3]. For Kristeva, our experience as subjects in the Symbolic is pervaded by difference, gap and lack – that which lies between the inner coherent self and our vested mirror images. It is a lack of this lack, or boundary failure, that causes abjection. By effacing the boundaries between myself and that which is not “I”, the abject disrupts the integrity of our understanding of the self, revealing the incompleteness and emptiness constituting us. It reminds us that we are, after all, fractured beings, having once experienced abjection as infants, still vulnerable to that abysmal, suffocating maternal space.[4] Thus, abjection is “a violent, clumsy breaking away, with the constant risk of falling back under the sway of a power (of the maternal) as securing as it is stifling.”[5] To enter the Symbolic, a nascent being must invest in a mirror image to which it identifies to and mimics (mimetic conflict), and with access to language, it then matures into a subject. Hence, Kristeva’s notion of abjection is acutely helpful in understanding figures that are in a state of transition or in constant threat of it. Clinging for his life to the gutter of a roof, the protagonist Scottie Ferguson is portrayed from the very outset as an on-the-edge, very fractured and insecure character. Scottie experiences profound dissatisfaction with both his professional and personal life. As a detective, his failure to prevent the death of a fellow policeman fragments Scottie’s professional confidence. Later diagnosed with vertigo, Scottie must resign from the high position of the law, and for a man who wholly devotes his life to career, such withdrawal strongly shakes his sense of identity, which is already quite enigmatic. Regardless of the mask he puts on, as Scottie, Mr. Ferguson, or John, he constantly feels threatened by the lack of control of not only his locomotion but also his personal life. Furthermore, there is a way in which Scottie also feels constrained physically by the corset, “It’s this darned corset. It binds.”[6] Scottie’s very first line exhibits frustration, not so much with the physical limitation as with the way in which this traditionally female garment undermines his masculinity, creating an unnerving confusion of gender. To reassert his masculinity and competency before Midge, the feminine, Scottie challenges his acrophobia by gradually ascending a low footstool, only to fall into her arms like a little child. Hence, within the first ten minutes of Vertigo, it becomes apparent how Scottie’s uneasiness with his incompetency predisposes him towards Gavin Elster’s thrilling plan of “saving” his alleged haunted wife, Madeline, in return for a restoration of control. While Madeline seems to be associated with suicidal obsession, she eludes definition. She is the utmost abject. Despite the early introduction of Madeline as the living wife of Gavin Elster, the fabrication of her appearance and demeanors is so perfect that it convinces Scottie at times that she is being possessed by someone from the past – Carlotta Valdez, her alleged haunting great-grandmother. Shifting between “Madeline” and “Carlotta”, she blurs the distinction between life and death. Moreover, while she shows a fascination with death, Madeline simultaneously expresses utter fear of it, “And I don't want to die, but there's someone inside me, there's a somebody else, and she says I must die.”[7] It leaves the spectators, especially Scottie, with a daunting confusion of attitude towards death. Like the corpse, Madeline “is death infecting life. Abject… Imaginary uncanniness and real threat, it beckons to us and ends up engulfing us.”[8] While chasing Madeline around San Francisco, Scottie, so caught up in the uncanniness with which Madeline mirrors him, fails to realize the threatening closing gap between them. Split between herself and Carlotta, Madeline also possesses a very ambiguous identity, a dilemma that Scottie identifies with. After his resignation, Scottie’s occupation now becomes “a wanderer”, which allows the chase after Madeline, a lost wanderer, to come very naturally. Furthermore, unable to break with the motherly Midge, Scottie sees the female version of his dilemma in Madeline, in which she cannot seem to cut off the thread with the mother figure in Carlotta.[9] We witness the most striking visual mirroring when Madeline leads Scottie through a back alley, then a dark back room of a building. Hiding behind the door, Scottie watches Madeline through the small crack opening. This door, however, has a mirror attached to its back, and the camera captures a wonderful shot in which the screen is split between Scottie’s gaze into the distance and the close-up face of Madeline.[10] The mirror image appears so seamlessly that it is as if Madeline becomes Scottie’s reflection. As the chase progresses, the camera, which represents the male gaze, zooms in further and further on Madeline, especially at the art gallery (in the Palace of Legion of Honor), implying Scottie’s increasing identification with Madeline. Scottie’s obsession with Madeline escalates so rapidly that closing the gap between Madeline and him any further can put his identity at stake. When Madeline jumps into San Francisco bay, Scottie also jumps into the water to save her. It seems as if after their submersion in this universal disintegrating body of fluidity, Scottie’s fascination with his mirroring image in Madeline transforms into a desire to merge with her. As he says to her, in half seriousness, “You know, the Chinese say that once you’ve saved a person’s life, you’re responsible for it forever.”[11] It seems paradoxical that when Scottie keeps repeating, “No one possesses you”, he becomes all the more possessed. Here it is clear to Scottie himself that he is losing sanity. In probing Madeline for an answer —“Why did you jump? What was it inside that told you to jump?” — Scottie is actually trying to figure for it out for himself. Reasoning collapses and Scottie now has become “a willing victim”. Scottie’s failure to save Madeline annihilates any remaining sense of competency, leaving way for abjection. Having once helplessly witnessed another’s death, this second trauma forces him to confront his weakness which gets greatly accentuated in court, “It is a pity that… he did not make a greater effort the second time… He could not face the tragic result of his own weakness, and ran away.”[12] For Scottie, if not already engulfed by abjection, this harsh verdict truly consummates his sense of incompleteness. Scottie’s hallucination of the ghost of Carlotta in the arms of Gavin Elster implies the disappearance of the line between the real and fantasy. Though we cannot pinpoint when Scottie confronts abjection, be it at the mission tower or in court, his dream shortly after Madeline’s presumed death signals his withdrawal from the Symbolic. The dream features Scottie walking forward toward Carlotta’s open grave into which the camera descends. What follows is Scottie’s silhouette falling towards the mission roof the same way Madeline died.[13] In this very moment, Scottie is Madeline is Carlotta. As one regresses back into abjection, it becomes apparent that the maternal space is terrifying, for “it threatens as abyss, dividing wall, or suffocating vise.”[14] The instinct of the nascent subject then is to ascend back to the Symbolic as fast as it can by reliving the mimetic conflict – by mimicking the maternal marks and repressing differences. It is not until it can access language that it becomes a subject capable of differentiating with “the other”, or the mother. In merging his identity with Madeline, Scottie also assumes her obsession with the dead Carlotta. Like a ghost, he wanders the street of San Francisco in an act of a nascent being going through mimetic crisis. As he returns to places where Madeline used to be, he collects all the signs, from the bouquet, the restaurant, etc. in hopes of rebuilding a linguistic system of signifiers with which to recognize “objects” as “other”. The manipulation of Judy’s body and psychological well-being has been central to the controversy of violence against women in Vertigo. Stripped, molded, and made over, Judy’s body and mind are abused repeatedly by Scottie. Mulvey describes Scottie’s sadistic behavior as an attempt of a male spectator, terrified by the spectacle of female castration, to fetishistically recreate the ideal, phallic woman. Modleski likewise condemns his molding of Judy as a way to restore the lost (loved) object.[15] However, these criticisms seem to assume a sense of agency on Scottie’s part. I’d argue that at no point of time in his relationship with Madeline/Judy is Scottie actively in control. Contrary to feminist criticism, which reproduces a subject/object binary by explaining Scottie’s seemingly mad behavior in terms of shaping an object of desire in order to maintain the illusion of an ongoing relationship with her, [16] I would argue that the subject/object positions are much less distinct. Scottie is caught in the desperate effort of a fragile yet-to-be-subject, caught in abjection with constant threat of further regression, to re-enter the Symbolic. In Scottie’s makeover of Judy, he is actually still a yet-to-be subject seeking to re-establish his mirror by recreating Madeline’s persona in Judy. Therefore, what appears as a sadistic manipulation of the female is in fact a desperate defensive mechanism of a fractured being in peril of receding further from the Symbolic. In fact, Judy, supposedly the victim of the violence, may actually possess a greater sense of agency than Mulvey or Modleski give her credit for. When she runs into Scottie on the street as Judy Barton, Judy could easily cut him off, yet she chooses to lead him on. Judy, again and again blinded by her “love”, willingly cedes her own agency. Hence, I would argue that charging a non-subject being of “subjecting” another “object” to its non-existent “will” is ideologically unsound. Any attempt to attributing blame is futile in this stage of abjection. The notion of blame, however, exists after the discovery of the necklace for it marks Scottie’s ostensibly true re-entrance into the Symbolic. Just when Scottie is rejoicing at successfully convincing Judy to transform into Madeline, his presumed correct mirror, he realizes at the sight of the necklace, the utmost important sign, that he has not escaped abjection at all. It is at this point that the prospect of becoming a complete subject reappears to Scottie: once he has solved the mystery, once he is in the position of knowing…. There is something uncanny about why the necklace is such a vital key to Scottie’s resurgence. Rather than indicating the eruption of “the Real” like Modleski argues, the necklace, which is associated with Carlotta, represents for Scottie the sign of Mother. A symbol of the maternal marks completes the symbolic language and allows beings to differentiate itself as an “I” against “mother”, an “other”. It is the necklace, an accessory that locates at the most fragile body part, which truly brings back Scottie his vitality. Contrary to popular feminist condemnation of Judy’s inevitable death to satisfy the male fetish, I believe that her demise indeed does Scottie no good but to threaten his fragile subjectivity. Judy’s death is preceded by the climactic ascent of Scottie and her up the mission tower. Modleski deciphers their confrontation as violent. The ugly truth that he has been duped undermines his sense of masculinity and consequently catalyzes his sadism to its peak. He drags Judy up the tower to guilt and punish her to death in the hopes that it will prevent her from coming back to challenge his identity. However, contrary to Modleski’s interpretation, I believe the nature of Scottie’s emotional confrontation with Judy is constructive rather than destructive. For Scottie, a subject fresh minted out of abjection, setting clear boundaries is vital to securing his identity. By locating himself as a victim of Gavin Elster’s plot, and Judy as the accomplice, Scottie successfully establishes a firm gap between them to prevent future boundary failures. As a result, he reserves for himself an identity – the victim. Furthermore, for Scottie, a former detective, his core of confidence lies in his ability to solve a crime. Thus, confirming his accurate dissection of Gavin’s plot greatly boosts his sense of competency and security. Thus, in Scottie’s defense, his move in dragging Judy up the tower to confirm reality is for the sake of knowing more than anything else. He seeks no punishment on Judy. In fact, I would argue that Judy’s death is an unfortunate event for Scottie as it represents a loss of the mirror. To lose an otherness is to lose boundary, to lose gap, and to risk falling back into abjection. The battle to secure his own subjectivity never seems to end for Scottie. This rereading Vertigo with Kristeva’s structural analysis is my attempt to fend a favorite auteur from feminist obloquy. However, in the end I find myself getting caught in between, as though in a state of abjection myself. On the one hand, I am traumatized by the violence committed against Judy, for in the manipulation and obliteration of her body I feel my own. On the other hand, I feel the urge to vindicate Scottie, a fractured being, without any permanently clear sense of “I” versus “other”, struggling throughout Vertigo to secure his survival and identity, unfortunately at the expense of others. Scottie’s struggle reveals important implications about the structure of Vertigo and the nature of subjectivity: he is always on the edge. Vertigo begins with Scottie, a very insecure being losing his footstep and hanging precarious off the edge, only to end with Scottie at the top of the mission tower, again standing on the edge, threatened as he looks down at the sight of his disappearing mirror, of the other that defines him. Like a spiral, the narrative of Vertigo falls back onto itself, in which there seems to be no end or beginning but just subjectivity in constant threat of abjection that grows bigger/deep with every swirl. Going back to the most haunting question of Hitchcock criticism - “Can Hitchcock be saved for feminism?”- it appears that when applied to Vertigo, our femininist critics who fixate on analyzing the nature of violence against the female seem to have missed the most critical point – the notion of blame cannot find a foothold in Vertigo, where subjectivity is in constant transformation. Hitchcock’s refusal to include an alternate ending in which Elster is brought back to trial (as demanded by the U.S Production Code Administration office) creates a narrative structure that makes the task of attributing blame impossible. Following this logic, is it not that the charge of misogyny can be suspended for Vertigo, and Hitchcock, for this brief moment, can be saved for feminism?

Work Cited

Kristeva, Julia. Powers of Horror: A Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.
Modleski, Tania. The Women Who Knew Too Much. New York: Routledge, 1989.
Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,” Screen 16, 3 (1975): 15-16, reprinted in Feminisms: An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1991.
Reiniki, Martha J. Sacrificed Lives: Kristeva on Women and Violence. Indiana University Press, 1997.
Vertigo. Dir. Alfred Hitchcock. Perf. James Steward and Kim Novak. Paramount Studios, 1958. DVD.
White, Susan. “Allegory and Referentiality: Vertigo and Feminist Criticism,” MLN , Vol. 106, No. 5, Comparative Literature. Dec1991.

[1] Laura Mulvey, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,” Screen 16, 3 (1975): 15-16, reprinted in Feminisms: An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism (New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 1991) 445-446.
[2] Susan White, “Allegory and Referentiality: Vertigo and Feminist Criticism,” MLN , Vol. 106, No. 5, Comparative Literature (Dec., 1991) 913.
[3] Julia Kristeva, Powers of Horror: A Essay on Abjection (New York: Columbia University Press, 1982) 4.
[4] Martha J. Reiniki, Sacrificed Lives: Kristeva on Women and Violence (Indiana University Press, 1997) 27.
[5] Kristeva, 13
[6] Vertigo, Already Hitchcock.
[7] Vertigo, Hitchcock.
[8] Kristeva, 4.
[9] White, 917.
[10] Tania Modleski, The Women Who Knew Too Much (New York: Routledge, 1989) 92.

[11] Vertigo, Hitchcock.
[12] Vertigo.
[13] Modleski, 95.
[14] Reiniki, 27.
[15] White, 912.
[16] White, 918.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Whos to Blame

...Robin Turner 0165959 ENG 101 – 12 October 11, 2012 Who’s to Blame? It has become common today that obesity has become a serious problem. In the article “Don’t Blame the Eater”, David Zinczenko argues that fast food companies contribute to obesity. Zinczenko chastises these fast food companies. He sympathizes with the teenagers that put in a lawsuit against the fast food industry because he was a latchkey kid himself due to his parents being divorced and his mother working long hours to foot the bills. Zinczenko gained an enormous amount of weight by the time he was 15 years of age. He turned his life around by joining the Navy Reserves, changing his diet and eventually getting involved with a health magazine. I’m of two minds about Zinzcenko’s claim that Obesity and Diabetes are health problems due to the lack of personal responsibility. On one hand, I agree that everyone is accountable for what goes in and out their mouths, except for babies. Also, life is about choices, either one chooses to pick the good choice or go with the bad choice. It’s all up to that person to make the decision. On the other hand, I’m not sure if personal responsibility can outweigh these top notch fast food restaurants. What is a teenager to do if their parents are working extended hours and is never at home to cook a healthy meal? Is it really logical that teens would pull something out the freezer and make them a homemade meal when McDonalds is on the nearest corner and Taco Bell is not......

Words: 449 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo

...Reginald Beauvoir Mrs. Pellegrini IM1401 10/14/2012 Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo While researching film made in the Nineteenth Century I found that the use of technology brought new idea and cause a revelation that effected movie goer worldwide. The following time line shows how each innovation had an effect on the technology that was introduce in that time period. The expectation of movie goers was high as a result the film makers came up with new way of composing motion picture on the big screen. The thought process was open to new possibility. The use of movie projection called magic lantern was introduce in the Seventeenth Century. The use of different filming technique was on the rise. The thought process of movie composer consists of what they were exposed to and to shoot at different perspective. It was well thought out. A movie that was directly influenced by a technological advancement was Alfred Hitchcock, “Vertigo”. To achieve my point, I have organized my paper into four main sections, two of which have sub-sections. In the first section, there is a record of three important events in twentieth century motion picture history: technological changes, the information revolution, a film by Alfred Hitchcock. The techniques he used and how it paved the way for movie director that came after him. It discuss articles a about how the movie Vertigo played an important role and how it impacted the twentieth century film making producer and filming in connecting...

Words: 1520 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Who's Blame?

...Media, the internet, and Placing Blame decided to search the internet and see what could be found. Beals stated “After spending a great deal of time online… information is easy to find on just about everything. And there are many people who don’t hesitate to share their ‘knowledge’ with anyone- child or adult- who will listen. The second thing I noticed was that there really is no regulation on the internet.” Beal found anything on the internet and the people who would share information like how to build bombs. People have to look for other people like that. Even without the internet there has always been violence. Violence is everywhere in the media; there are violent video games and TV shows everywhere. My brother and I grew up on television and video games. Not once did I or my other brother get in a fight or bring weapons to school. The media did not make us violent though we watched many violent shows or played violent video games. Though the media does someone make violence easier because sometimes younger kids do not know the different between real life and what they see on TV. There are many factors to lead someone to violence. How someone was raised may effect whether or not they are violent. Media and the internet have made violence easier but violence has and will always be around even if there was no violence in the media. The media and internet play a role in violence but do not cause it. If the media and internet were all to blame then everyone who......

Words: 377 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The Blame Game

...rp    The Blame Game In Catcher in the Rye, Holden Caulfield, a teenage boy is going through the process of growing into an adult. Holden deals with all the struggles of a teenage boy while he deals with the death of his younger brother. Holden is angry at his death and blames his parents and other adults. Therefore, he is petrified at the thought of growing up, because he does not want to be like those adults he considers flawed and phony. As a result, he does not carry out the responsibilities of a boy his age, but watches adults and explores adult behaviors in his struggle to grow up.  Because Holden continues to fail in his battle to gain maturity, he looks to his future as an adult and becomes petrified at the thought of becoming one of them. Consequently, he tries to stay young to avoid the process of becoming an adult.   He is obsessed with childhood and is wedged between a world of the innocence of children and the complex world of adulthood. Holden is stuck at a crossroads where he must choose what he wants to do. But since he is becoming older everyday it becomes evident to Holden that he will soon fall into the same status as adults and be forced to make the same compromises that they do. Holden is told that "life is a game" and that he must suck up to people and listen to authority if he ever plans to be successful in life. Holden does not want to take responsibility to communicate with others that want to help him. For example, When Dr. Thurmer,  tries...

Words: 1293 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay


...In Hitchcock’s film, Vertigo, The story revolves around the main character, Scottie who is the detective in the film that has a fear of heights known as acrophobia and his relationships with Madeleine, who is the wife of Scottie’s class mate Gavin Elster, and Midge, Scottie’s old college friend. Hitchcock uses camera work such as profile shots of Madeleine and full shots of Midge to emphasize on the fact that even though one is secretive, she dictates the main character while the other is like an open book, yet she has no genuine power over him. Madeleine is beautiful and a glamorous woman who comes from a wealthy background. Scottie becomes attracted to her in the very first scene at Ernie’s restaurant. He watches her as she sits and walks out elegantly, while he is sitting in one corner. Hitchcock captures the scene with by taking a tracking shot of the restaurant to give the viewers the feeling of the romantic ambience. The tracking shot zooms out of Scottie to the other side of the room on Madeleine, whose back is facing the camera. This suggests that Hitchcock wants to continue with the theme of suspense throughout the movie, which is why he first takes shots of Madeleine’s back to the camera, followed by the profile shot from a distance. The profile shot is marked by a wooden doorway that frames Madeleine as if she is in the spot light, which she is for Scottie. The camera then zooms in for a close up shot of Madeleine’s profile. The sharp feature of the profile shot......

Words: 1386 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Vertigo and Laura

...Both Vertigo and Laura raise the idea of masculinity, and it's place and role in society and character. The relationships in both films, particularly those between the male protagonists and women, highlight the differing ideas of masculinity. The character of Scottie in Vertigo highlights how relationship with women can greatly effect the idea of masculinity, whereas this is reversed in Laura, when the title character Laura shows how she greatly changes the concept of masculinity through three differing male characters. The relationship between detective John, or Scottie, Ferguson and his friend Midge Wood is one of the more interesting looks at male and female identities in the film. Robin Wood points out that the scenes in which both Scottie and Midge are both present place a strong emphasis in their communication difficulties. (Wood, 1989) Midge seems to treat Scottie more as a mother than as a friend. Whether this is in an attempt to ease the pressure off Scottie with his vertigo, she constantly talks down to him. This is highlighted when Midge attempts to explain her bra to him, telling Scottie that "You know about these things. You're a big boy now." Scottie recognises this relationship, going as far as to tell Midge "Don't be so motherly." (Modleski, 1988) Another scene in which these two appear is when John attempts to overcome his vertigo by climbing a stepladder. This scene also highlights the mother-son relationship these two seem to have, as Midge warns......

Words: 333 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Placing Blame

...“Placing blame for the failing educational system” Nothing is more vital to this nation’s success than the future of a good education system. Most Americans have good reason to be concerned with our current educational system which is failing miserably. The United States used to be a leader in education. Now it has dropped in rank due to things such as: poor performance from teachers /students, low test scores, overcrowded class rooms, high school drop outs, and underfunded federal programs. We face solid competition in higher education from nations like; China, Latin America, India, and Singapore. The United States government tried to raise the standards when congress introduced a new bill called “The No Child Left Behind” act. Unfortunately, this bill that former President George W. Bush signed left many Americans unimpressed. Although, I do commend our government for trying to address this critical issue, many people found this bill to be far from the change we needed.  Our educational systems are swamped with all the politically correct information and the testing requirements, that we have lost sight of some value basic information. Many students are able to remember book knowledge, but cannot display basic common sense. Although, I know that classes like “cooking” are not popular anymore, but maybe a small part should be mandatory. Teaching children about balancing their personal budgets might lead to someone helping our national debt. And if they learned about......

Words: 666 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

The Blame Game

...The Blame Game The blame of childhood obesity has become a silent war in America against the Big Food Corporations and the World Health Organizations. The article, Junk Food Nation, written by Gary Ruskin and Juliet Schor provides a deeper insight of this subject matter. They believe the correlation between what is driving the Administration’s policy to support Big Food cooperation’s instead of World Health Organizations is large infusions of cash. The article explains how, although obesity in America’s youth is a developing concern, it is often down-played and blamed on other factors such as lack of exercise. Blaming other factors, and providing expert analysis of the situation makes it difficult to place blame on any one cause of the epidemic. The ideal solution to the concern at hand would be acknowledgement of the problem, and genuine efforts from the government/Big Food cooperation’s to work together for the betterment of the health of the youth. One would expect as obesity is a continuing rising issue in today’s society that cooperation’s would ban together to save our youth from the sting of being over-weight. However, this criterion was barely met. The government scratched the surface of the issue by acknowledgement that obesity was an issue. Ruskin indicated, “Kraft announced it would no longer market Oreos to younger children, McDonald’s promoted itself as a salad producer and Coca-Cola said it won’t advertise to kids’ under12.” Some cooperation’s......

Words: 501 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Who to Blame

...Have you ever wondered who was the real blame for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet death? In William Shakespeare play Romeo and Juliet there is a struggle that they caused their own deaths, but in my opinion there is one more person. Therefore I think Lord Capulet is to blame for Romeo and Juliet's death because of the way he forced the whole situation of Juliet marrying somebody she didn't love. Lord Capulet told Juliet who she was going to marry which was Paris. "Doth she not count her blest"(813). The quote explains Capulet saying it's a blessing to marry Paris and him only because I picked him out. "Get thee to Church a Thursday"(813). The quote explains how Lord Capulet set the date that Juliet is getting married. That date only and that day and time. "But fettle your fine joints gainst Thursday next to go with Paris to saint peters Church, or I will drag thee on a hurdle thither"(813). The quote explains how if Juliet doesn't go to Saint Peters church on Thursday morning he will drag her there. Lord Capulet also tried to put a guilt trip on Juliet to marry Paris. "I tell thee what get thee to church a Thursday or never after look me in the face. Speak not, reply not, do not answer.(Page 813) The quote is explaining how if Juliet doesn't marry Paris she will never be allowed to talk to him ever again. "Hang thee, young baggage. Disobedient wretch!!" (813). Capulet is calling her awful names in hopes she changes her mind and know her wrong. "Unworthy as she is that I've......

Words: 695 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Blame Game

...Blame Game Some of William Shakespeare’s best work climaxes with gruesome bloodshed and tragedy. Unlike much of the entertainment we seek today, Shakespeare’s plays revolve as much around the flaws of its protagonists as it does their journey in seeking justice. In Hamlet, a heartbroken Danish prince embarks on a journey in avenging his farther who was murdered by his uncle. Claudius, Hamlet’s greedy uncle, is the root cause of much agony in Elsinore but can the audience really hold him solely responsible for the tragedies which befell the other characters? The answer is that Claudius’ treachery was the catalyst of all disorder in the play but, Polonius and Hamlet himself are also to blame. In Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Polonius’ tendency to overthink and meddle in others’ business leads to the death of several characters. Whether your intentions are good and your heart is in the right place is besides the fact that you are at fault for any and all trouble you cause. When Polonius says, “Ay, springes to catch woodcocks. I do know, when the blood burns, how prodigal the soul lends the tongue vows” (1.3.115-17), he tells his daughter Ophelia that Hamlet does not really love her but is deceiving her as a means of seduction. As a result, he orders her to quit making herself available for him. This sniveling behaviour ends up setting a new tone for the rest of the play. Once Hamlet secretly puts up an act of insanity in his pursuit to kill Claudius, Polonius offers advice to...

Words: 926 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Blame Shifting

...behavior. James’ Responsibility Isn’t there a point in a person’s life that they have to take responsibility for their own actions, rather than placing blame on others? At what age should a person be in charge of their own destiny? These are questions that we should ask in James’ situation. James is 24 years old and still living at home with his mother, why? Most young adults move out of their family home after school. They get a job and move forward but James is a narcissist. A narcissist project guilt, blame, and responsibility onto others, pass the buck, and hold themselves immune to the consequences of their actions (Vaknin, 2014). Could there have been other contributing factors that would have an effect on James’ problem? Sure James could have introduced drugs or alcohol into the equation and that could have added to the reason that he stole items. He would have needed money to fuel his addiction. We do know that James has an alcohol problem which he is blaming on his parents fighting. If James would have been removed from his home as a juvenile, would he have become a burglar? It could go either way. Since James is a narcissist, he would blame any behavior on his parents. So as an adult he could shift the blame to being removed from home instead of blaming his behavior on watching his father in action. Blame-shifters have difficulty taking responsibility for problems. James would need to learn to be in control of his own actions before he could......

Words: 1828 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Blame Canada

...Professor ENG. April 9, 2015 Blame Canada!!! Air Canada was a more likeable job than Russell Toyota because it was a nicer place to work. Air Canada was a white collar job. Air Canada was climate controlled. The type of work done at Air Canada was easy, not time consuming, or that physical. Most of the work consisted of standing behind the counter checking in passengers. There were many breaks between the planes departure, which meant a lot of down time. There was very little heavy lifting, at most was a few pounds. This job was mostly walking to and from the gates. Co-workers and passengers were always smiling. The pay at Air Canada was more than at Russell Toyota. Air Canada paid per hour. Show up and get paid. Air Canada was my favorite job so far. Being that the airport is only three miles from home, the commute was much shorter and calmer than that of Russell Toyota. Russell Toyota was my least favorite job. Russell Toyota was a blue collar job. The Russell Toyota body shop was not climate controlled. The body shop was dusty and dirty. Blazing hot in summer, freezing cold in winter. In contrast the work at Russell Toyota was hard, meticulous, physically challenging. Unlike that of the airport which was not. Fixing cars after a collision is time consuming and physically demanding work. Russell Toyota was twenty two mile away from home. This made commuting a total pain in the neck. Having to fight traffic every day, an hour both ways was a big hassle. The customers......

Words: 342 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Who's to Blame

...Who’s to Blame? I think we all have the freedom to choose what to do with our lives and determine where we want to go but, definitely internet and media exert much influence, in my opinion a 75%, in the decisions than someone takes. It is quite true that many television programs and web pages incite to large-scale violence, but our work is do not let ourselves be influenced by that and take care of our families or friends will not be affected for it. Personally, I have known a case where a person after reading a story online which gave details of how it could make "perfect crime" decided to put that information into practice and unfortunately for him he died in the attempt. According to the opinion of Dr. Allen Francis, in the recent mass murder in Arizona, he said: "The Media and the Internet also have much to answer for. The 24 / 7 coverage of violence inadvertently lurid promotes imitation. Even more culpable is conscious selection as half the stars of the most-promoting reckless voices to degradation of civility and encouragement "of verbal abuse the dog Which Increase the Risk of Physical Violence. Media ratings obviously have been given over our national safety priority." (Allen Francis) In a study by several psychologists in the state of Texas we can clearly see what violence in the media or the internet can do in people. In their presentation give us examples of studies which clearly reveals how damaging can be for anyone be constantly exposed to violence, "A......

Words: 585 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Vertigo Essay

... I recently had the pleasure of viewing Alfred Hitchcock’s movie titled “Vertigo”. It is based on the 1959 novel “D’entre les morts” that was written by Boileau Narcejac. Jimmy Stewart who was portrayed “Scottie” was stellar in this film as well as Alfred Hitchcock’s presence and directorial style; paramount. Cinematography, which is the combined art and technology of films and how it is created, was evident in this film (Cinematography). One of the features that Alfred Hitchcock is heavily noted for is the use of color to draw in feeling and emotion within a scene. For instance, in the opening scene of Vertigo, the first thing you will notice is the use of red, blue, and green. The colors shifted from one to the next with the changing of objects and certain panning techniques that were used to focus the audience on a certain point of the frame and color significance. Most importantly, Hitchcock used those colors as a lead in to the rest of the entire movie, which they are used throughout every scene and have a specific meaning and connection. For an example, the color red was used in a matter that would have the viewer assume that emotions like that of terror, fear, and horror. However, throughout the film the same color is used in flowers, wallpaper, and other scenery, which had a different meaning as in warmer emotional feelings. The color blue was used in connection with Scottie’s case of vertigo, paranoia, guilt, and supernatural like elements. It was also common......

Words: 1443 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Who's to Blame

...GE 217 – Homework for Week 7 Major Writing Assignment (label as “Who’s to Blame?”) Read the article,”Violent Culture,” by Darren Beals, p.147-150 in your textbook. Analyze this writing in the same manner that you analyzed Quindlen’s article in class. Make sure you identify all types of evidence. You may use the following chart: Paragraph #s | What is the author saying? | How does the author do this? | 1-3 | The author is saying that the media and public wants to know what made this 15 year old boy kill his family and some classmates. | He states that everyone wants to know why Kinkel killed his family and others. | 4-7 | The author is saying that the media is trying to blame the internet but the media is bringing more focus on the case than the internet. | He describes how the media had the story on every channel that he turned to. | 8 | The author is saying that he would like to know who this Kip Kinkel is really. | By asking who is Kip. | 9-10 | The author is saying that kids have just as much access to guns than an adult and that kids will brag about their shooting skills. | By asking is gun rights lost on our kids and if kids admire movies of certain actors than they will intend to brag about their skills if they have any. | 11 | The author is saying that acting is a bigger issue than boasting and that by viewing other incidents kids may feel the intent to commit some of the same violent acts. | By stating the big difference between boasting and acting.......

Words: 414 - Pages: 2