Free Essay

Book and Movie

In: Science

Submitted By maiicuaa
Words 2110
Pages 9
Example 1: subject by subject
Books vs Movies (capitalize both words)

There are different ways to get a story from different sources in modern times. Books have been good sources for stories, but movies are getting more popular and have the same story with wrong word the books. Why auxiliary verb needed people still reading books, and others are prefer watching should be an infinitive not a gerund the movies? Reading books and watching movies have a lot in common but there are some differences that makes the readers remain faithful to reading books.

First, books keep a person’s mind going. A mind is filled with questionspunctuation and as the wheels in your head are turning, your brain is being put to more use rather than if you let it go numb during a movie. It is basically the same as watching television versus going outside and playing for a couple of hours. Movies are like a version of a television show, wrong punctuationthey are just longer. Everyone has heard that if you watch TV for too long it is not good for you, that you should pick up a good book instead.comma splice Should not the same rule apply when it comes to watching a movie?
You are contrasting movies and books but you go off on another idea of television. Keep on topic and show how books contrast to movies. In this paragraph you are trying to show how the brain reacts differently to movies and books. (Give more examples of that.)

Films can do a lot of different things. They can bring whole worlds to life before our eyes, make characters into living, breathing flesh and blood. They can have us on the edge of our seats as vicious battle scenes are fought right before us, have us sobbing over a death, a heartbreak or smiling with joy. Films can make us see a lot of things – sometimes things that even books cannot do so well. They are a pure escape – there's nothing like sitting in the cinema, devoid of any other distraction, focused completely on the story playing on the screen.
(This paragraph does not have enough on how books are in contrast. More needed to show your point.)

In general films are great, but they just don't have the same inclusion that books have. You're merely an observer: you aren't feeling everything the character feels, aren't reading every single one of their innermost thoughts, all of their doubts and fears and hopes. Films let you observe everythingBooks let you feel everything, know everything and live everything. With a book, you can be the hero who kills the demon with one twirl of your blade. You can be the girl who battles cancer, along with all the pain and uncertainty that comes with it. You can be a demigod, you can be an alien or an angel, a god, a villain, a hero. You can be in love, you can hate, and you can triumph or can lose. You can be anything and everything. There are no limits and no restrictions. Nothing is impossible, nothing is out of reach.
Nice description of what happens in books, but next to no contrast with movies. ( comment from teacher )

People who love reading are frequently disappointed by the movie versions of their favorite books. There have been some great films made from books, but typically movie versions of books tend to frustrate readers because they are not just like the book. When a film director works from an adapted screenplay, the results are not the same as reading the book for various reasons. For example, a film that precisely follows a novel likely would be too long for most audiences to sit through at a single showing, so some things must be left out. Also, a book can easily convey things to the reader that are much more difficult for a movie to convey, such as background information about the setting, the history and nature of characters' relationships or even what characters are thinking at certain times.

As we have seen, there are many differences between reading books and watching movies wrong punctuation however I believe this is not an opinion essay that books are much better than the movies, of course movies can bring whole worlds to life before our eyes, make characters into living, breathing flesh and blood however wrong punctuation books let us live everything, it brings our imagination up to a whole new level. Books allow for more character development. People love the feeling of "getting to know" a character through the pages of a book.
Example 2: point by point

Reading Books and Watching Movies There are different ways to get a story from different sources in modern times. Books have been good sources for stories, but movies are getting more popular and have the same story with the books. Why are people still reading books, and others prefer watching the movies? Reading books and watching movies have a lot in common, but there are some differences that makes the readers remain faithful to reading books. Both reading books and watching movies are telling the same story. They give the reader or the audience the same feelings after appreciating about the story. The reader can feel sad of the story in a book while the audience can also feel the same after watching about the story in the movie. The general ideas, which are the themes and main characters of the story, are the same. For example, Romeo and Juliet is romantic no matter it is read from a book or watched from a movie. A book and a movie both have a beginning, rising actions, and a resolution. The story are formed in the same structure regardless to it is a book or a movie. Despite the similarities, reading books and watching movies give details through different ways. By reading the books, the reader has to open his mind for imaginations. Books only show words, and the images of the story are imagined in the brain. On the other hand, movies give a particular picture of the story to the audiences, and the audiences get details through visual and hearing. The audiences can only get what is shown in the movies but can’t think outside the box for more creative thinking. The readers can have different feedbacks to the story, but the audiences can only agree with the movies; therefore, reading books and watching movies make the readers or audiences response differently. Watching movies can save a lot of time, but reading books could take a long time depending on the speed of reading. For those who can’t read fast, they would prefer watching movies. A movie will take about two hours, but reading a book could take more than two weeks for some readers. People think reading books and watching movies are the same, so they will choose to watch the movie for their time’s sake. Watching the movie can give them a better picture about the story because it is visual and is within a shorter period of time; therefore, the audience can remember the story easier. Besides, movies keep on renewing every week, but a new book needs to be written and published which will take a long time. That’s why people who like new and fresh things will prefer watching movies. Although watching movies seems to be more convenient, but people are still reading books. The reason is that books give more details to the readers and usually reveal more characters that are not shown in the movies. Movie producers need to cut away some details because they need to squeeze everything into one to two hours. Books can attract the reader to continue reading and give some prolonged suspenses so that the reader will be hooked or tempted to finish the book to find out the truth. Reading books can improve the reader’s writing and reading skills, but watching movies brings nothing else but entertainment. Before movies were invented, most of the people read books to entertain and improve themselves. Since movies came out, people are attracted by the beautiful and colorful graphics in the movies but have forgotten the books which are full of details and meanings. People are too obsessed to the shortcuts and mirths from the movies, but maybe they should just grab a book, sit down, and read a good book.
Example 3:
A lot of parents want their kids to read the book then watch the movie. But why? If you read the book, you have an image in your head of what the character looks like, what their voices sound like, and what the scene looks like, and usually it is pretty good. But when you watch the movie, all those images get shattered.

When you watch a movie, you start thinking that the characters in the book actually look like the actors that are in the movie. The movie producers use famous people to act out the characters in the book. For example, in the book Percy Jackson and the Lightning Thief, Percy is supposed to “look” like a 12 year old who doesn’t know what he is doing and would lose any fight he got into. But in the movie, Percy looks sort of athletic, and is 16 years old. So when you the reading a book, you see him as a sort of weakling, but when you see the movie, that whole mental image gets shattered.

Another thing is when you read a book, there may be parts of the book that you really like that you would like at see on the TV screen. But then, when the movie finally comes out, the part you like isn’t even filmed! Like in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, there was one part that always made me laugh. It was the part when the giant turns from stone to a living thing, and walks around looking for “the little witch that was running around on the ground”. I really wanted to see that part in the movie, but when the movie finally came out, that part of the book was not even in the movie, and you don’t even see the giant change back to a living thing at all. I bet that this has happened to a lot of people and that they were all disappointed.

Writing a book is a lot easier than making a movie. With a book you can describe places that come out of your imagination, which could never become “reality” no matter how hard Hollywood tries. For example, Dragon’s in our Midst, how are you supposed to make 14 dragons, a girl with dragon wings and a boy who can breathe fire look real inside of a movie? In some movies they can’t even make swords look real, not to mention a girl with dragon wings. It is definitely possible, but it’s easier to describe it.

But movies can also be better than a book. With a movie, you don’t have to read anything, you can watch a movie while doing homework if you wanted to. But with a book, the only thing you can do is read, you can’t read a book and do homework at the same time, that’s impossible. I’m not saying that I wouldn’t read a book just because I had to actually read it, but when you’re reading a book, all you can do is read the book.

But, with a book, you can bring it anywhere you want, and stopwhenever you like and later, just start reading exactly where you stopped. But with a movie, you kind of have to watch it at home, and you have to remember when you stopped in order to start again.

One thing that I don’t like about movies is that people only make movies around 3-4 hours long because they are afraid that people won’t watch it if it’s too long, which means they have to cut a lot of parts out and then put some more parts in to let it make sense. But with a book, it can be as long as the author wants it to be, as long as it all makes sense. I’ve seen people who read books that are over 600 pages long and not mind a bit, but when a 3 hour movies comes, they just can’t concentrate that long.

These are all the main differences that I can think of, and most of them are in favor of the book. So I conclude that books are better than the movie.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Book Made Into Movie

...First and foremost, Elizabeth Moreno will need to research the French culture a little more. It is important for Elizabeth to not do anything that may disrespect or belittle any of the management staff as her kinesic behavior can put her in this position. As per this case, French managers are suspicious of most technical communication and would rather “face-to-face meetings and on-site consultations”. Chances are they will be paying close attention to Elizabeth’s non-verbal language during her visit with them. For example, something as simple as posture can be misinterpreted. To Europeans, “a relaxed posture in business meetings may be taken as bad manners or the result in poor upbringing” (Deresky, pg 133). Americans such as Elizabeth wouldn’t think twice of a relaxed posture in a business meeting. It would also be wise of Elizabeth to obtain an English/French translator. Even though the universal language in her highly technical field is English, using the right words at the right time in the right manner is essential to making this assignment a success. In Exhibit 4-2 (Deresky, pg128), we see a classic example of how words can be perceived differently even though the same language is being spoken. The American boss is looking for his Greek employee to be accountable for his role within the company and make sound decisions based on American culture whereas the Greek employee is looking for orders to be given from his American boss based on Greek culture. Also note in this...

Words: 1163 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Comparing The Outsiders Book And Movie

...Around 1981, Francis Ford Coppola received a letter from a librarian at Lone Star middle school. The text stated, “ We are all so impressed with the book, The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton, that a petition has been circulated asking that it be made into a movie. We have chosen you to send it to. In hopes that you might also see the possibilities of a movie, we have enclosed a copy of the book.” The written document was signed by 110 little signatures who were eager for Coppola to make a film. Since he couldn’t resist it, he decided to make one. Two years later, on March 25 The Outsiders was released. As any film director should, he tried to keep the movie close to the original novel by S.E Hinton. However, movies and books are two different ways...

Words: 672 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Differences In The Outsiders Book And Movie

...The Outsiders book and movie are about the same storyline with the same characters and the same themes, although they also have many differences. The book is has many things going on, like Darry, Soda, and Ponyboy. Three brothers living together on their own after their parents died in a car accident. The book emphasizes on Soda’s horse Mickey. Pony talks about how he wishes he could buy Soda a new horse. I wouldn’t have known this if I had only watched the movie because Pony was thinking this in his head. In movies you can’t know exactly what the character is thinking unless it’s narrereated. The outsiders movie was not nerrerated but the book was. The movie is a shortened version of the book so many details form the book are left out...

Words: 333 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Beowulf: Comparing The Book And Movie

...The book of Beowulf and the movie have a lot differences and also has its similarities. Most of the time the movie is very different from the book movies always want to give things drama and more excitement. also movies make us understand more of the book if you are not a reader. but books have those tasteful words and always a lot more detail and Beowulf was one of those. it was so much different from the book. In Beowulf the epic poem Hrothgar was not the father of Grendel. In the poem there is never any mention of either Hrothgar and Beowulf ever being involved or enticed to become the fathers of Grendel or the dragon which the major points in the movie. Hrothgar was also a good person in the poem rather than being an old drunken like...

Words: 522 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Outsiders Movie And Book Comparison the book. We read the book The Outsiders. S.E Hinton was the author. I liked the book very much and we eventually watched the movie. As I was reading the book I did not picture the movie the way it was. I am comparing the movie and book and also making some differences. Some of the main characters in the book are Dally, Ponyboy, Johnny, Two-Bit, Darry, and there is other characters that aren't as important. The narrator in the book is pointing at Ponyboy's point of view. To start off, the characters are very different in the book then they are in the movie. Sodapop was in the book more than he was in the movie. There was blonde kids, (Soda and Dally) in the book but there wasn’t in the movie. Sandy wasn’t even mentioned or in the movie and she took a big part in the book. In the book's point of view the narrator is Ponyboy, and in the movie there isn’t really a narrator it is in every one perspective. In the book two-bit was 6 foot tall...

Words: 1106 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Book Theif Movie Review

...“The Book Thief” Movie Reflection People always say 'the book is so much better than the movie'. In The Book Thief’s case, I agree with this statement. In my opinion, I think the original novel that Markus Zusak wrote was more captivating and told the story in a more fascinating way, including narration by Death and many other important details that were not included in the movie. For this reason, the movie did not do the book justice. Unlike the book, it felt like it was rushing through events in the beginning and the ending of the movie, but in the middle it felt slow and a little dull. The movie was still good, but I don't think it was as good as it could have been. As I mentioned before, many events from the original story were not in the movie. Some events that were in the movie got altered, which, to me, changed some effects of the story. An example of this would be when Hans stood up for the Jewish store owner getting beat by a Nazi, where in the book Hans courageously gave a Jewish man a piece of bread. The way it was written in the book seemed like more of a risk because it put his whole family in jeopardy, whereas in the movie it didn't seem as heroic. Also Alex Steiner and Hans should have left for the service at the same time, like in the book, because then Liesel and Rudy could have made a connection over their missing fathers. Although the movie made many changes, in some ways it also modified the book in a good way. One scene not in book was where Rudy and......

Words: 752 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Crucible: Comparing The Book And Movie

...To compare The Crucible book and movie, you first need to understand the what it's about. It's a story that relates to the salem witch trial where people were killed because they were accused of witchcraft, where a lot of innocent people were killed.The book goes into more detail about it so you can imagine it whereas the movie does not. There were a few differences in scenes which will be explained. At the beginning, the book goes straight to Betty being sick in bed with everyone around her, but in the film the beginning started in the woods with the girls dancing around the fire. We witness the dancing and Abigail drank the chicken blood and whispered to Tituba. In the book we. Find out about the dancing through parris who says he wittinessed...

Words: 290 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Giver Movie Vs Book

...The Giver the book and The Giver the movie is the changes that were made in the plot of the film adaptation. More specifically, a large change that was made in the plot was Jonas’s relationship with Fiona. The scriptwriters added multiple different events between Jonas and Fiona that developed their affinity and transformed the movie into a love story, most likely to attract more viewers. One event that was significant in the movie was when Jonas kissed Fiona and she was taken by surprise. In the book, if Jonas kissed Fiona she would be confused and would be thrown off guard because she was unable to have feelings, and therefore would not share the same feelings as Jonas. The scriptwriters included their kiss to accentuate Jonas’s feelings for Fiona, and to foreshadow the sacrifices that Fiona would later make to develop the love story such as skipping injections and aiding Jonas in his escape....

Words: 658 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Giver: Comparison Of The Book And The Movie

...When they make novels into movies every movie has to make changes to make fit into the plot better, but are those changes are having a positive impact on the movie or having a negative effect on the movie.The Giver book and the movie have some major changes but both had positive and negative effects. The changes from the book to the movie that had a positive effect and enriched the story. The first change would be Asher job in the book was the Director of Recreation of 6’s and in the movie, his job as a drone pilot.This job enhanced the story by him finding Jonas in elsewhere and moving talks to him and helping him get to the boundary.The second change was when Jonas of the sled the Giver explained it, but in the movie, the Giver just gave...

Words: 297 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Book of Eli Movie Review

...Eng 152 Professor Snyder The Book of Eli With December 21st 2012 (speculated date at which the world ends) coming closer, and the amount of post-apocalyptic films coming out, some avid movie viewers might already be jaded with these types of films by now. This movie directed by the Hughes Brothers, shows a clear and accurate depiction of the power of the Bible in broken times. The Book of Eli is not your average post-apocalyptic film. From the melodic soundtrack, to the astonishing performance delivered by Denzel Washington, “The Book of Eli” is certainly a must watch! The Plot of the movie is carefully crafted, and it is easy to tell that the directors and producers all took their time before putting together this intricate plot. “The Book of Eli” takes place several years after a nuclear holocaust. The lone man named Eli (played by Denzel Washington) wanders the desert nuclear wasteland, living on what he can find and disposing of any marauders who give him any problems. After traveling west for a few years Eli arrives in a small town. Eli comes to the attention of the town’s leader named Carnegie after killing several attackers in the local bar. Carnegie sends the attractive Solara (Played by Mila Kunis) to seduce Eli and to try to convince him to stay, seeing that Eli has an enormous amount of combat skills. Carnegie later learns that Eli has one of the last known copies of the Bible; which determines Carnegie to obtain this book at all costs. Eli survives......

Words: 1955 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Outsiders, Compare Book and Movie

...Sixteen years after a sixteen-year-old wrote this book, Francis Ford Coppola turned this novel into a movie. The book is a coming-of-age novel, but the movie focuses on the characters' loss of innocence. The movie follows the story line very closely. The reader is only told that this story takes place in the southwest, but the movie places it in Tulsa, Oklahoma, in the year 1966. It also changes the conflict from the East Side versus the West side to the northside versus the southside. This minor directional change was probably made due to the relative time proximity to the musical West Side Story, which won the best picture Academy Award in l961. However, as with all movies, character insight that is critical to understanding the story is lost when the format goes from the written word to the screen. Ponyboy is telling us the story, the same as in the book, but the 91-minute film only glosses over many character relationships. <a href=";navArea=CLIFFSNOTES2_LITERATURE;type=Lit_Note;kword=SE_Hinton;kword=The_Outsiders;contentItemId=139;tile=3;sz=300x250;ord=123456789?" target="_blank"><img src=";navArea=CLIFFSNOTES2_LITERATURE;type=Lit_Note;kword=SE_Hinton;kword=The_Outsiders;contentItemId=139;tile=3;sz=300x250;ord=123456789?" width="300" height="250" border="0" alt="" /></a> With the exception of Ponyboy, the viewer misses out on knowing most of the novel's characters. Darry and......

Words: 2470 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

The Birds Movie Vs Book

...Have you ever been attacked by hundreds of birds that have gone savage? In the novella, The Birds, that happens frequently, as well as the movie. Although, the novella didn’t interest me as much as the movie did. I could visualize what was happening better in the movie. I also understood the movie better than the novella. The movie also had different characters which went better with the storyline in my opinion. I liked the movie better because I visualized what was happening, understood what was happening better, and I liked the different characters. The first reason why I liked the movie better was because I could visualize it better. I could see how the birds started coming together. I could also see the facial expressions the characters...

Words: 375 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Outsiders Movie Vs Book

...”The Outsiders” looked as if it was an amazing book and movie. While reading and watching they minorly relate to each other. However they do have major differences. There are also have inconsequential similarities. Both book and the movie include a rumble.They both have creative people and actors. The book and movie have all the characters doing Acro-Batics Right before the rumble. The setting of the movie and the book are both in Tulsa Oklahoma. Johnny was afraid of the Socs in the book and the movie. In the movie Johnny’s scar was a lot smaller than in the book. In the movie Ponyboy didn’t ask if Cherry could see the sunset really good from the South side until later in the movie. In the book Pony and Darry didn’t chase after Soda. Ponyboy was cooking eggs and dropped one in the movie...

Words: 271 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Comparison : the Reader, Book and Movie

...ompar Comparison between 'The reader' – Book/Movie Usually when it comes to books and movies books are a lot more detailed and descriptive towards characters and their feelings. Movies usually cut out important parts or aren't as deep as a book. In this case i felt that the movie was very much alike to the book and included all emotions and important scenes, what i really liked also was that the story line wasn't changed in the movie. They emphasized really well Hanna and Michaels relationship in a way i thought wouldn't be possible. They managed to portray their relationship exactly how it was explained in the book, every detail came across to the viewers and also made it a lot easier to understand the book itself in ways one couldn't before seeing the movie. I thought they wouldn't emphasize the fact that Hanna was illiterate but they really made that come across well therefore the whole movie had better understanding as did the book. I do feel that the book was much slower with the reading between Michael and Hanna but in a way that was well done because then the movie would have become too slow and gotten a bit boring. It's different in the book because you expect that slowness but it was good that in the film they put together most of that in a few minutes, still emphasizing it. The book made some scenes more intimate of course because its hard to get that across in a film. They portray feelings very well for example when Hanna dies that gets across very well......

Words: 425 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Movie Vs Book Essay

...should read. If you like reading realistic fiction books, this one will ruin it for you. Wouldn’t you rather watch the movie than read the worst book of all? Others would rather hear otherwise of how it is an amazing book. If you like books that have a climax, don’t read this book. One reason to not like this book is that there is no climax. Normally, you would expect your average book to have a climax, such as a huge fight that determines the ruler of Earth. This book, however, doesn’t have the climax you would expect to see. It’s just a smooth ride through the Plot Diagram of rising and falling actions, and climax. In real life, this is normal for some orphans....

Words: 459 - Pages: 2