Premium Essay

Booth, Wayne C(Layson)

In: English and Literature

Submitted By hijodelsol
Words 289
Pages 2
Booth is a critical pluralist; he believes that there is more than one valid way to evaluate works of art. Booth's position has been denounced both by dogmatists, who claim that there is only one way to view artworks, and by skeptics, who think that neither side can be reconciled and that every critical opinion is based on certain fallacies. Booth's criticism is characterized by clear, concise prose, a strong argumentative technique, and a wittiness which relieves the heavy intellectualism of his topics.

The Rhetoric of Fiction, Booth's first book, immediately established him as a true "Chicago Critic," a designation which indicates that Booth follows the neo-Aristotelian thought championed by R. S. Crane, Booth's instructor at the University of Chicago. The Aristotelian critics believe that art must contribute something to life beyond immediate pleasure; it has a function of the highest order, to instruct as well as to entertain. Art, as Aristotle believed, is essentially imitative; it is, as Booth says, "a living out of how some problems of life can be represented." The Rhetoric of Fiction discusses the way in which the author's meaning is expressed and conveyed to the reader. Booth's key concept involves the "implied author," or the reader's conception of the author's values and attitudes. A Rhetoric of Irony also analyzes authorial intention and the bond between reader and writer that occurs when the reader understands both literal and ironic meanings in works of literature. Booth's recent book, Critical Understanding: The Powers and Limits of Pluralism, explores the pluralism of Crane, Kenneth Burke, and M. H. Abrams, and the implications of their beliefs on modern criticism.

(See also Contemporary Authors, Vols. 1-4, rev. ed. and Contemporary Authors New Revision Series, Vol....

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Traditional Education vs Alternative Education

... Abstract I am studying traditional education versus alternative education. Because I want to find out if an online degree will provide students with an equivalent value in the workforce.  In order for my reader to understand: How these two types of education looked at in 2014 by employers and society? How does online education differ from traditional education? Do they provide individuals with the same opportunity for knowledge and career development? I will make an overlying statement supported by research as found in “Rulebook for Arguments” fourth addition by Anthony Weston. I will use the gather my information, and deliver it to the reader as found in “The Craft of Research” third addition by Wayne c. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb and Joseph M. Williams. I will research the average grade point average, graduation statistics and employment numbers in the leading traditional and online secondary education institutions. And I will use public information on institutions finances and bond issuance to offer data on how education is trending. I believe that after conducting my research I will be able to share with my reader the trends in education, and how it is growing and changing. My readers will get a clear sense of my stance on alternative education and how it provides value in the workforce. My reader will also learn the financial growth for secondary education institutions and what these trends mean for the...

Words: 266 - Pages: 2