Free Essay

Brazil's Economy

In: Other Topics

Submitted By qlucia222
Words 3758
Pages 16
Brazil’s Economy

In 2001, Brazil was viewed as one of the up and coming, fastest growing economies in the world. In fact, Jim O’Neill wrote a paper titled, “Building Better Global Economic BRICs”, which is about the emerging economies in the world. The acronym BRIC represents: Brazil, Russia, India, and China (Smith). These global leaders have lived up to expectations and have grown at a much faster rate than the rest of the world. They have been able to lift millions of people out of poverty, including 40 million in Brazil alone. Will Brazil continue to be part of the BRIC in years to come? A 2010 Goldman Sachs report predicted by the year 2030 the BRIC countries would account for an astounding 41% of the world’s market share (Smith). But we now see that those predicted numbers are very far from certain. Many believe if Brazil does not improve some of its problems plaguing its society, the BRIC could easily become the RIC group. Without the necessary changes being made, Brazil’s annual compounding rate of 4.4% could be washed away. Recently the GDP numbers show their industrial output lingering around recession numbers. It is also predicted that the Brazilian economy will grow less than the U.S. economy this year (Rapoza). Brazil was originally able to secure its spot in the fastest growing nations in the mid to late nineties by bold privatization and economic liberalization policies by then president Fernando Henrique Cardoso. Cardoso’s successor, “Lula” da Silva continued the reforms once Cardoso left office in 2001. Between the terms of Silva and his hand-picked successor and current president, Dilma Rousseff, government spending became excessive and their government controlled pension system now needs to be reformed(Llosa). One of the main economic issues is the push for protectionism must be limited by President Rousseff. She knows it is an uphill battle, because of the Brazilian economic downturn, which has caused a huge protectionism uproar throughout the country. This uproar even includes other Brazilian politicians, whom are now making the necessary economic reform much more difficult. These protectionists believe the cheap products they have been purchasing from China and Mexico make it impossible for Brazilian companies to compete in their market. They also believe that due to the very loose monetary policies in Europe and the United States the Brazilian companies are at a huge disadvantage. The loose monetary policies were even enough for President Rousseff to meet with President Obama to discuss the issues (Llosa). The protectionists have already pushed for a minimum of 100 new tariffs. These “necessary” tariffs could last as long as 12 months, affect the areas of steel, petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals, and capital goods. The government said, “The duty hikes were needed to ease price differentials caused by the ever weakening global economic outlook” (Rapoza). They believe the tariffs will help boost domestic manufacturing, which is considered to be one of their economy’s weaknesses.
The protectionism has come under fire from many different places. Particularly from the British Prime Minister, David Cameron, who said, “To try to isolate and protect industry from competition may benefit the local industry, but it has long-term costs and will block the development of a truly competitive and innovative industrial base” (Guerrero). He warned the Brazilian people and the government that the protectionist policies could potentially backfire. Unlike Brazil, the UK is actually ridding themselves of their trade barriers. They are also cutting taxes on partnerships and providing tax breaks to new businesses, along with providing more work visas. They are making all of these changes to encourage talented international workers to relocate to the UK. Cameron said by making all these necessary changes it will proved “more jobs, growth, and prosperity” (Guerrero). As we see Brazil is heading in the exact opposite direction. President Rousseff said that these tariffs are a “legitimate trade defense” against developed countries. She said this after there was an official complaint from the United States government and allegations from the European Union members (Guerrero).
It is predicted that inflation will reach 5.5% while GDP growth forecasts will be a mere 1.5%, which is down from 4% originally. Despite Brazil’s Central Bank’s attempts to keep inflation down it will eventually be uncontainable. The domestic prices will rise due to the significant drop in competition due to the tariffs. This will in turn make the amount of household debt levels among the lower and middle class citizens, which is already at record levels, increase (Fisch).
Theses trade policies have also further damaged the already weakened regional trade among Brazil’s neighboring nations. The Argentinian government began the trade restrictions which broke the South American free trade block. Now Brazil is following along and reducing the amount of regional trade significantly. Due to the market size of Brazil in comparison to its neighbors Brazil is considered to be the leader of the neighboring nations responsible for maintaining stability in trading and cooperation among the neighbors. Free trade is the best way to grow and succeed and the new protectionism will not only have a negative impact on the Brazilian economy in the long run, but also Brazil’s neighboring nation’s economies. Many people blame President Rousseff for Brazil’s current path toward protectionism and avoidance of diversifying regional trade.
Another problem evident in the Brazilian economy is the rapid increase in government spending. In 1995, social welfare in Brazil was a mere 234 billion real ($115 billion), but has since increased to an astounding 638.5 billion real ($315 billion) in 2010. Federal spending has doubled in just 16 years. The average amount of money spent per person was $726 per person in 1995 to $1642 per person by 2010, which is a 172% increase in spending (Staff). By 2012, spending had increased by another 10.7 percent. These numbers include spending in 11 different social areas, particularly education and healthcare, but also including including general welfare, benefits to civil servants, social assistance, food and nutrition, housing and urban planning, sanitation, employment and income, rural development and culture. President Rousseff wants this increase in spending to stimulate the country’s economy. Along with the overregulating previously mentioned, the Brazilian government is also hurting the economy with their overspending and overtaxing. But in order for the spending to continue, the government has also raised taxes. Carlos Caicedo, a political risk consultant, went as far as calling the Brazil tax system a “monster” (Collins). The government is making it difficult for businesses, investors, and entrepreneurs to succeed. This spending has led to a 6% inflation rate (Rapoza).
The government has come up with programs that are very costly. For example, there is the “My house, my life program” which helps low income Brazilians buy or build their first house (Lavin). In addition to the programs, because all of the added money in the education field there have been increases in education, but skilled labor is hard to come by which pushes wages up and productivity remains low. This can ultimately be a problem for any economy.
A key economic expectation for the Brazilian economy is the upcoming 2014 soccer World Cup and the 2016 Summer Olympic games. These functions require large amounts of government spending in preparation. Not only do stadiums need to be built, but also areas around the stadiums need to be remodeled and cleaned up. In order to get these particular events, the countries must pitch their ideas to committees on how their plans for these huge events are better than the other ideas submitted by other countries. The government knows that during these events Brazil will be under a microscope due to the fact that people from all over the world will be visiting to support their particular country. This can be detrimental for some economies, if not handled the right way. In the 2010 World Cup, the government spent nearly $4 billion to build stadiums and improve transportation and other aspects of the country. Brazil will have to do the exact same thing, but it is estimated, for the two events, they could spend as much as $31.3 billion on building as many as 12 new stadiums, redoing roads, and expanding their 12 existing airports, among other things also (Zimbalist). Most of the money will come from tax money that the government will be happy to spend. These capital investments put the country at risk of inflation, and poor quality construction. This massive project could lead to problems rather than growth. Brazil currently has a successful unemployment rate at around 6% (Zimbalist). When governments take on major, long-term infrastructure investment programs, like the ones Brazil is currently taking on, and with their unemployment rate, there is a threat of over pressing the economy. This is a primary reason why Brazil is currently experiencing rising inflation, which is currently at over 6 percent per year. Because of the amount of construction going on throughout Brazil the construction workers are fully employed, especially the top, high skilled construction workers. One report that came out said, 80% of São Paulo’s construction projects are being delayed because there aren’t enough skilled workers to proceed. With large capital projects, such as those for the World Cup and Olympics, there are strict deadlines, which unfold to severe time pressure; it ultimately forces the construction workers to go forward without a properly skilled and trained work force. This could lead to a lot of potential problems down the road in the form of low-quality work, low-quality materials and wage inflation (Zimbalist)
The huge event could lead to a result that isn’t quite up to par with what is predicted. While many sports enthusiasts and loyal fans will be swarming to Brazil for the events, it could potentially not be quite what they are expecting. This happens because when huge event like the World Cup and the Olympics occur there are crowds of people. Because of these crowds some of the people who normally travel to Brazil during that particular time of year will be less inclined to actually travel to Brazil like they normally do. Many people like to avoid crowds and higher costs that come with the crowds at all costs. It is hard to estimate the actual drop off in the estimations. The 2004 Olympics in Greece led to a 10% drop off in tourism due to the Olympics, while the 2002 winter Olympics in Salt Lake City kept 50% of non-residents away from Utah. The greatest surprise is that there was a drop off in tourists in Beijing In August 2008(Olympics) in comparison to August of 2007. Rio de Janeiro is not a well-kept secret either. It is one of the most visited cities in the world and gets approximately 2.8 million visitors per year (Zimbalist). One mistake during the two events could lead to a drop in that number, much like the pollution in Beijing was spotlighted during the Beijing Olympics.
When it comes to huge events, there are a lot of problems that could arise. For example, the violence, which is common for Brazil, could affect the amount of people who attend. There is also the huge possibility of corruption. Brazil Is in between 40 and 49 on the Corruption Perceptions index (Transparency). Basically they are in the middle of the pack. Their score, although not terrible, the door is definitely left open for the distinct possibility. That corruption could severely affect the final result of the events on the economy. There are things completely uncontrollable by the government, which include traffic and weather, both of which can have a dramatic effect on the tourism levels. In addition to the money being spent, as many as 1.5 million Brazilians are scheduled to be relocated from their extremely poor favelas in Rio de Janeiro. They must do this because their favelas are in a very convenient spot for a new stadium that will ultimately replace the favelas. A huge problem is Brazil’s land particularly in Rio is very scarce. Each Stadium will take up approximately 15 to 20 acres. With 12 stadiums being built, that is approximately 204 acres of urban land being taken up. Theses stadiums, although beautiful, will probably end up being useless after the actual events. In Beijing, their stadiums are beautiful, important monuments, but they are now mostly sitting unused. These empty stadiums are now sucking away money from the government and the economy. In 2010 the Wall Street Journal analyzed the 2004 Summer Olympic Games’ stadiums. An astounding 21 of the 22 stadiums built in preparation for the games are sitting empty (Zimbalist). Brazil will be no exception to this pattern. They are forcing over a million poor people to move from their homes, for what could be seen as an eventual monument.
Then we must look at the long term effect these events will have on the economy. It is evident that Brazil will have a short term boom in their economy due to the amount of money that will be crammed into the economy. But the long term is much more important than the short run. Brazil will see an initial boom in GDP which will lead to higher prices for the short run. In the long run the GDP will level off and end up resulting in inflation. We saw this exact thing happen in Norway, who hosted the 1994 winter Olympics. Forty percent of the hotels built for the games were bankrupt by 1999. Two skiing factories were also sold very cheaply to avoid bankruptcy. The 1994 Olympics ended up providing little to no benefit for the Norwegian economy and was a huge disappointment in comparison to the economic predictions made prior to the games (Zimbalist). Even if the events are a “success” and make profits, in the long run that all could change. The expensive costs of the stadiums could quickly drain all the money made, particularly with low grade materials, and shoddy work being done initially. There will be expensive repairs to make in the two years in between the World Cup and the Olympics which will drain some of the profits and after the Olympics are over the profits will be forced to maintain these “monuments.” To give an example of this occurring we will look at the 2000 Olympic Games in Sydney, Australia. It was reported that the games wound up breaking even. But the Australian state auditor found, the long-term costs to be $2.2 billion dollars. Most the costs were from the $30 million per year to maintain their Olympic stadium (Zimbalist). The government is currently in a tailspin with spending, with these huge events coming up it is evident the spending will only be getting worse.
The last economic issue worth noting is the crime rate in Brazil. Many foreign companies are beginning to avoid doing business in Brazil due to the crime and violence. Investors are afraid for their own security and well-being. One of the biggest crime concerns have been the increase in kidnappings and ransoms. Thomaz Favaro a security and political risk analyst said, “The security environment has failed to keep pace with gains in the economy” (Collins). He also said, the bulk of the issues are petty crime and robbery. The amount of theft is also increasing, due to the inadequate police force on the roads. Thieves are stealing cargo from trucks, even on major highways (Collins). Crime has been an increasing problem in São Paulo, one of Brazil’s largest cities. The amount of murders has increased dramatically over the past year. The period of time between October 24, 2012 and November 12, 2012 there were 154 murders and 1127 murders from the beginning of the year to November 12th, which exceeded the total for all of 2011. Violent crime rose 7.8 percent in 2012 in comparison to 2011 (Cawley). Criminals are randomly targeting and shooting people, in particular police officers. It is believed they are targeting police officers in response to a recent crackdown in drug trafficking. Criminals are even buying and selling the names and addresses of police officers, so they can find and kill the officers (Jordan).
The PCC (First Command of the Capital) are believed to be primarily responsible for the actions against the police. This notorious group is formerly known as the Party of Crime and is feared throughout Brazil. The PCC was formed by a group of convicts serving in one of Brazil’s maximum security prisons. They have now grown to dominate organized crime in São Paulo, they have spread throughout Brazil, and they have managed to have a presence in the neighboring Paraguay and Bolivia. They have recently expanded their place in narcotics supply, specifically cocaine and marijuana, and illegal gun trading (Fox). The PCC is quickly becoming the biggest and most powerful gang in Brazil. Often they are even more powerful than the Brazilian police. This has sparked fear in many locals and tourists alike. If something isn’t done people will continue to avoid Brazil for business and travel. This can be very detrimental to the economic growth of the country.
To add to the discussion about government spending, the Brazilian government knows that crime is a huge problem that is why they have announced a $900 million investment toward security forces. It is their goal to make the upcoming World Cup the safest one ever. As part of the $900 million the Brazilian government is investing in hi-tech vehicles, helicopters, and surveillance equipment. Brazil is currently taking advice from other countries who have hosted the Olympics, for example Canada and South Africa. The government knows the importance of a safe environment in terms of protecting your citizens, and in terms of a growing economy.
The government has got to make necessary changes to get the Brazilian economy back on track. It is evident that Brazil’s economy has been growing extremely rapidly since the mid-90s; at least up until recently. In order to revamp this growth the government must go back to what originally got them success. They went away from free markets and started with their new protectionist ways, specifically the tariffs. The free market allows costs to be reduced, which help the consumers tremendously. Brazil has always been a consumer market and not a producer market, Brazil’s goods and labor are too expensive, which is why so many of their goods were from China and Mexico. The government also needs to cut their spending and cut taxes as well. They need to cut some of the newly formed, unnecessary social programs that could be costly down the line. Cutting costs will ultimately tough to do because of the World Cup and Olympics both being in the next 3 years which will require spending. The key will be limiting that spending while ensuring quality production. Because of the high labor costs and low quality work being done on the stadiums the government would smart to contract builders from another country, which could drastically reduce the production costs, while significantly improving the quality of work done. By improving the quality it will in turn reduce the upkeep of the stadiums, saving the government millions of dollars. After the Olympics are over it would be wise for the government to rid themselves of the stadiums. They should try to sell as many stadiums as possible to private owners, such as one of many soccer teams in Brazil. The private owners would be in charge of the upkeep of the stadium ridding the government of those costs. If the government can reduce their costs and spending they have the potential to at least break even from the international travelers coming to the events in Brazil. The last and possibly most important thing the government must get in check is reducing the crime levels. The safety and security of citizens should be the top priority of the government. With the violent crimes increasing drastically the past few years, people feel unsafe. The government must improve their police force beginning with improved equipment that can match the criminal’s equipment. It is said that there are areas in Brazil that even the police won’t go to which shows the difference in firepower between the police and criminals. It would also be wise for the government to weaken their stance on gun control. This would be the most cost effective thing to do for the government and possibly the most effective. People who are randomly being gunned down on the streets deserve the right to protect themselves. In Brazil you must be 25 to own a gun, and it is virtually impossible to obtain a carry permit in Brazil due to government regulations. Also the gun owners must register their guns and pay a tax on them every 3 years (gunpolicy.org). By weakening their stance criminals will be less likely to commit crimes due to the fact that more people would have guns and can protect themselves and their families. Brazil is in a unique situation they have experienced so much growth so quickly and they seemed to be doing everything right so quickly, but now thing have changed. The government must realize this and reverse some to the recent changes they made that hurt the economy. They can make these changes and quickly get back on the right path.

Cawley, Marguerite. "Violent Crime Increases Outside Brazil's Major Cities - InSight Crime | Organized Crime in the Americas." Violent Crime Increases Outside Brazil's Major Cities - InSight Crime | Organized Crime in the Americas. N.p., 28 Jan. 2013. Web. 16 Apr. 2013. <http://www.insightcrime.org/news-briefs/violent-crime-increases-outside-brazil-major-cities>.
Collins, Stuart. "Brazil's Stable Politics, Economy Offset by Higher Taxes, Crime." Business Insurance. Solution Arc, 16 Apr. 2013. Web. 16 Apr. 2013. <http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/99999999/NEWS040102/120309899?tags=%7C59%7C332%7C338%7C76%7C313%7C80%7C84%7C342>.
Jordan, Lucy. "Death Toll Rises in São Paulo Crime Wave." The Rio Times. N.p., 13 Nov. 2012. Web. 15 Apr. 2013. <http://riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/front-page/death-toll-rises-in-sao-paulo-crime-wave/>.
Smith, Randall. "DealBook." DealBook Jim ONeill Prominent Goldman Economist to Retire Comments. NYTimes, 5 Feb. 2013. Web. 12 Apr. 2013.
Staff. "IT Outsourcing News." IT Outsourcing News Nearshore Americas RSS. Nearshore Americas, 11 Sept. 2012. Web. 14 Apr. 2013. <http://www.nearshoreamericas.com/study-brazils-social-spending-doubled-16-years/>.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Brazil Infrastructure

...Olympic Games in 2016. Over the past few decades Brazil’s economy has seen growth with the possibility of emerging as one of the top economies in decades to come. It is a ‘BRICS’ country along with Russia, India, China and South America – this can’t be right – this is a continent not a country South Africa ??(added in 2010) representing emerging countries that have the potential to rank among the world's most powerful and influential economies. Hosting such high profile sporting events is a risk. The challenges facing the Brazilian government are huge. The World Cup is only six months away and its has been reported that six of the twelve stadiums needed for this event are experiencing delays and will not be completed by the December 31st FIFA deadline. Brazil is struggling to build the infrastructure needed to host both these sporting events. It is critical that transportation and housing are available to accommodate the estimated 500,000 World Cup visitors. Failure to complete the necessary infrastructure improvements would be a massive embarrassment in the short term and in the long term there would be ramifications for the economy and for foreign investments in Brazil. However, these upcoming events have forced the government to make infrastructure funding a priority, embrace private investment and make some tax changes. These have the potential to stimulate Brazil’s economy through tourism and to promote it as an emerging economy and to have a big impact on logistics. Brazil...

Words: 2742 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Bric Brazil

...that this country is on a consistent growth path and that this will play an important role in the 21st century world economy? The current economic indicators for Brazil that clearly demonstrate that they are on a consistent growth path and that they will play an important role in the 21st century world economy are as follows: Their Growth Domestic Product (GDP) was up 7.5% in 2010 (the highest of any country in the last 25 years) at a 2.09 Billion dollars and it still grew in 2011 but not as much 2.8% but that is still very positive trend in these tough economic times. Brazil has had positives in their economy due to the demand of exports with countries like China; their main exports are iron ore, soybeans, oil that was found offshore. Brazil is favorable with their trade balance as well as reducing their debt. Brazil’s population is 200 million, and they keep their people employed, Brazil has a low unemployment rate and it was at all time low of 5.8% in 2011. They enjoy a budget surplus of 2.9% showing that they a fiscally conservative and are making smart decisions with this restraint. Brazil’s high interest rates make them one of the world’s best investments. Brazil politicians have fostered growth and economic change in the financial markets as well as through social programs. Investors from all over the world are happy to invest their resources in Brazil’s future. Brazil future looks bright The research proposal could be: Is Brazil growth a concern for the other countries...

Words: 394 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Brazil – Country Report

...Brazil – Country Report Introduction The country has been expanding its presence in international financial and commodities markets, and is one of a group of four emerging economies called the BRIC countries. Although struggling with social inequality and infrastructural deficits we think that Brazil is already a great world power. Also what attracted us to Brazil as a case study for this report is it’s exotic character. Not many people really know the extent of Brazil’s recent growth and improvements in social security and in overcoming poverty. We expect the labor force and operational costs to be low, like in the other emerging countries like China. However we take in to consideration higher costs involving security and bureaucracy. Chapter 1 – Short presentation of the country The Federative Republic of Brazil is the largest country in both South America and the Latin America Region. It is the world's fifth largest country, both by geographical area and by population, with over 193 million people. It is the largest Lusophone country in the world, and the only one in the Americas. Bounded by the Atlantic Ocean on the east, Brazil has a coastline of 7,491 km. It is bordered on the north by Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname and the French overseas region of French Guiana; on the northwest by Colombia; on the west by Bolivia and Peru; on the southwest by Argentina and Paraguay and on the south by Uruguay. Numerous archipelagos form part of Brazilian territory, such as Fernando...

Words: 8899 - Pages: 36

Free Essay

Bric Report

...Introduction BRIC is used in economics to refer to the combination of Brazil, Russia, India, and China which make up over 42% of the world's population. These nations are going to play a major role in the future of global economy. BRIC or BRICs are terms used in economics to refer to the combination of Brazil, Russia, India, and China. General consensus is that the term was first prominently used in a thesis of the Goldman Sachs investment bank. The main point of this 2003 paper was to argue that the economies of the BRICs are rapidly developing and by the year 2050 will eclipse most of the current richest countries of the world. Goldman Sachs argues that the economic potential of Brazil, Russia, India, and China is such that they may become among the four most dominant economies by the year 2050. The thesis was proposed by Jim O'Neill, global economist at Goldman Sachs. These countries are forecast to encompass over thirty-nine percent of the world's population. Goldman Sachs predicts China and India, respectively, to be the dominant global suppliers of manufactured goods and services while Brazil and Russia would become similarly dominant as suppliers of raw materials. Cooperation is thus hypothesized to be a logical next step among the BRICs because Brazil and Russia together form the logical commodity suppliers to India and China. Thus, the BRICs have the potential to form a powerful economic bloc to the exclusion of the modern-day G8 status. Brazil is dominant in...

Words: 4264 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Case Analysis

...commodity boom gave rise to the country’s export. However, the “Custo Brasil” was harming domestic manufacturing, while foreign opportunities threatened to overwhelm Brazilian marketplaces. The Custo Brasil has become the biggest factor in declining competitiveness of the country followed by poor infrastructure and undeveloped education system. According to Alfaro & White (2013), “poor infrastructure further hindered national growth.” In 2009, Brazil’s (2013) investment-to-GDP ratio dropped causing some analysts to suspect that weak infrastructure investment would be a future “bottleneck to growth.” Under the leadership of Dilma Rouseff, Brazil’s economic growth had gone stale and Rouseff’s administration battled to get the best balance between reducing inflation, maintaining exchange rate, and enhancing the competition of its exports. The government expenditures (2013) consume more than 40 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). Its overall pace of regulatory reform had slowed and the ax burden is much heavier than other emerging economies. It could be government corruption, insecurity of private property rights, or it’s dependent on commodity exports. Rouseff and her administration worked to improve competitiveness by addressing the issue of improving infrastructure. Its strategy was the public-private partnership aiming to provide jobs with attractive salary packages by reducing the cost of the local businessmen and taxpayers. The new strategy (2013) suggested a move toward...

Words: 962 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Economic Elements in South America

...biggest and most important element that will be focused on will be the economy because this is the driving force behind any business practice or any business decision. Entering a new economy without a solid background of information will typically end unsuccessfully. Brazil and Venezuela are two countries that are a great example because they are geographically close but they are very distant economically. Over the course of the last fifty years, Brazil has had three main objectives for their economy and those goals were to keep inflation under control, to maintain a high rate of economic growth, and to redistribute wealth to the poorest people of Brazil. Venezuela’s economy has undergone some drastic changes as well over the last fifty years with the biggest difference being the shift in their main export. Venezuela used to always be an economy based around coffee and cocoa as their biggest contributor to national GDP, and now the biggest export of Venezuela is oil. Oil was the main source of GDP growth in Venezuela when the economy started to stagnate. Not all of Venezuela’s economic change came from oil however; the country still is undergoing heavy change as a result of politics and the current president Hugo Chavez. Brazil’s large economy is one that overshadows many of the smaller South American economies, with a population of 194 million people and a GDP per capita of $11,239. Not only is this economy growing, the population is as well at a rate of .86%. Brazil has always...

Words: 1083 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Packenham Model in Lar

...GM 6030 A3 Regional Business Environment: Latin America MIDTERM EXAM The success of any business venture in Latin America depends on the ability of the company to find a country that will provide the right amount of incentives and benefits but that will also have a continued political stability and guarantees for property rights and investment security. Our analysis will evaluate the probability that Brazil and Argentina, as the possible site selections for K-FIT, will have this kind of business friendly environment and will enact market oriented reforms. We’ll evaluate the aspects in both countries that make them adequate or not to invest in them. We’ll also provide a recommendation of which country and region within them we see as the best option to set up operations. Argentina Argentina is a democratic republic organized as a Federation of 23 provinces and the Capital City of Buenos Aires. It has a total population of 42.19 million and has an area of approximately 1.07 million sq. miles in the southernmost part of America (Buckman, “The World Today Series 2012 Latin America” p. 35). To understand the current business environment in Argentina and the prospects of market friendly reforms going forward, we have to understand its cultural legacy and the way its society is structured. Since its beginnings as a nation, and even before it got its independence from Spain in 1816, Argentina’s society has been polarized between the “people from the Interior” that lived in the...

Words: 2882 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Brics

...of the shift in global economic power away from the developed G7 economies towards the developing world. G7 countries are existing nations with well-developed economies. It is estimated that the BRICS economies will overtake G7 economies by 2050. Although there is argument of whether South Africa should be included in the BRIC countries due to its population of 50 million, it was still included. China and India, predictively, will become the dominant global suppliers of manufactured goods and services, while Brazil and Russia will become similarly dominant as suppliers of raw materials. India is the second largest country with a population of over 1.2 billion people. The country thrives off of small businesses headed by poor families trying to make a living and to support their families. In the past decade however, India has made it clear they want to expand their horizons. This idea is not favored with everyone due to the fear of forgetting India's roots and traditions to the modern way (or Western way). It is also causing a stir about the decline in profit to small businesses. The value of Indian economic output in 2012 will be $1.95 trillion and $2.12 trillion in 2013. That makes it one of the 10 largest economies in the world. India has already overtaken several rich countries such as Canada as far as the size of its economy goes. But faster economic growth is important as well as creating a robust economy that offers many opportunities to 1.2 billion Indians. The way to...

Words: 1841 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Itb Expanding an Mnc

... 2 Expanding an MNC – Part 2 Given Brazil’s prominence on the international stage and strong underlying fundamentals, it has been decided that Brazil will be our country of choice for expanding our U.S. based manufacturing company. To begin this process we considered factors that we have studied in detail such as their economic system, political environment, legal regulatory environment, technological environment, ethical system, social responsibility indicators, and cultural dimensions. We will now build our strategy to enter and expand our manufacturing company using a methodical process for entry into this country. We have decided to look for buildings in the Southeast part of Brazil which comprises of Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo, Minas Gerais and Espirito, with our focus centered on Sao Paulo. The Brazilian business environment is as rich and varied as the country itself. Our company will be entering Brazil as a wholly owned subsidiary clearly; the advantages in going this way out weigh the disadvantages. Such advantages as reducing the risk of losing control over our product, allows us a firm control over operations, which is necessary for engaging in global strategic coordination, and gives us 100 percent share in the profits if generated in the foreign country. It also gives us the ability to realize location and experience economies. Being a manufacturing company we may want to establish a global production system...

Words: 1608 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Investments Market

...Industry’s survey. And the survey also mentioned that thought the economy is currently slowing down, 37% of the investors said that their investments did not decline. 50% of the investors did not find any increase in their foreign investments whereas 37% saw there was an increase I their investments. In spite of the negative sentiments in the economy, this seems to be an encouraging situation or development. On measures required to revive growth, 52 percent of the investors said their first priority was to clear 50 large projects worth more than Rs.1,000 crore and 200 large projects worth between Rs.250 and Rs.1,000 crore in the coming six months. The topmost policy for 24% of the respondents to the survey was the CRR and the policies set by RBI. The survey, conducted among 75 national council members of the CII, predicted that the turn-around in growth may take place only from next fiscal. In this circumstance 80% of the respondents do not see increase in the GDP crossing 5.5%. The investment growth during the year 1/4/12 to 31/3/13 was 5% which was the lowest in a decade. China--a perennial favourite among international investors, an example of the distinction between growth and return. With an economy growing at upward of 8% a year, China certainly appears enticing at first glance. After all, a Chinese company with stable market share should enjoy growth that is at least commensurate with the broader economies. But viewed through the focused lens of value, the country's...

Words: 1007 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Brics

...rivaling the advance economies. The BRICs, coined by Goldman Sachs, consists of four countries: Brazil, Russia, India and China. These four countries are the fastest-growing markets in the world. The intensification of globalization has allowed these four markets to flourish. Even with the latest economic crisis, the BRICs are predicted to recover faster than the advance economies. By 2050, all the BRICs are forecast to past most advance economies. But, there are implications that hinder the BRICs full potential economic growth. There are distinctive factors for each of the BRICs that have helped gain influential economic power over the decades. The most influential and fastest growing market is China. China has been an isolated country both politically and economically in the world. It was not until the 1970s and 80s when China brought about economic reform. The main focus of these reforms was to change the economy away from the agriculture sector to international trade. These reforms allowed for China’s economy to flourish by opening its economy to the world for the purposes of trade and direct foreign investment. Since the liberalization of the economy, China has become the fourth largest economy with a growth rate of 9.5% over 26 years (Forbes). Its gross domestic product in 2009 was about $4.7 trillion (CIA). The second largest economic emerging country is India. India’s economy is controlled and overseen by the government. India has a diverse economy with many sectors...

Words: 1267 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Mcgrew Company

...Anthony Craig LeTourneau University School of Business Dr. Juan Castro International Business January 14, 2003 Executive Summary McGrew Company has owned a secure share of the market for peanut combines in Brazil while importing all of their products. McGrew Company must have done research and concluded that it was to their advantage to import all of these products rather than producing them locally. Many factors can influence the cost of selling these products in Brazil. One deciding factor is the difference in cost of making the peanut combines in Brazil as opposed to making them abroad and the additional cost of transporting and various import taxes that would apply. Other factors, such as the stability of the economy, environmental factors, or political factors could also influence the risk of producing these products. We assume that McGrew performed significant research before organizing their business and evaluated these factors, concluding that producing these products abroad and importing them into Brazil was the most efficient way of running their business. However, once the local competition arose, these factors evidently changed, because it was evaluated that McGrew should produce the combines locally. Whether some of the economics or political factors changed or whether having the local support of customers would be influenced if they did not produce the combines locally is unknown to us. The local distributor in Brazil recommended to McGrew...

Words: 1329 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Icrc

...Leading Research DeAnne Aguirre Leila Hoteit Christine Rupp Karim Sabbagh Empowering the Third Billion Women and the World of Work in 2012 Contact Information Abu Dhabi Leila Hoteit Principal +971-2-699-2400 leila.hoteit@booz.com Beirut Ghassan Barrage Senior Executive Advisor +966-1-249-7781 ghassan.barrage@booz.com Cairo George Atalla Partner +20-2-2480-1444 george.atalla@booz.com Dubai Karim Sabbagh Senior Partner +971-4-390-0260 karim.sabbagh@booz.com Milan Luigi Pugliese Partner +39-02-72-50-93-03 luigi.pugliese@booz.com Mumbai Jai Sinha Partner +91-22-6128-1102 jai.sinha@booz.com Munich Klaus-Peter Gushurst Senior Partner +49-89-54525-537 klaus-peter.gushurst@booz.com New York Reid Carpenter Principal +1-212-551-6389 reid.carpenter@booz.com Riyadh Mounira Jamjoom Senior Research Specialist +966 1 249 7781 mounira.jamjoom@booz.com San Francisco DeAnne Aguirre Senior Partner +1-415-627-3330 deanne.aguirre@booz.com São Paulo Ivan de Souza Senior Partner +55-11-5501-6368 ivan.de.souza@booz.com Shanghai Sarah Butler Partner +86-21-2327-9800 sarah.butler@booz.com Stuttgart Christine Rupp Partner +49-711-34226-916 christine.rupp@booz.com Tokyo Akiko Karaki Senior Associate +81-3-6757-8709 akiko.karaki@booz.com Booz & Company Booz & Company 1 Booz & Company wishes to thank the experts who contributed their valuable time and insights to the Third Billion Index: • Rajnee Aggarwal, President, Federation of Indian Women Entrepreneurs (FIWE) • H.E. Fatima Al...

Words: 46868 - Pages: 188

Premium Essay

Current Crisis in Brazil

...now its economy is facing arguably the worst recession in 25 years. The current currency crisis in Brazil is believed to come from an embezzlement scheme of an oil company that The President of Brazil, Dilma Rousseff, endorsed. The whole issue was centered on corruption and illegal deals that the government of Brazil used to acquire an oil company in South America, Petroleo Brasileiro. The estimated value of the embezzlement scheme was about $2.1 billion. The amount involved in the deals was too much for the economy of Brazil. The deal and corruption involving the $2.1 billion caused a plunged inflation that is rising. The inflation could be a serious one since the amount of money that was embezzled affected the balance of the economy in the following ways: First Brazil raised the tax on financial firms. The government implemented a tax policy that saw financial firms paying more tax that before. The tax, known as the CSLL rose from 15% to 20%. The strategy was to boost the deteriorating economy through boosting the country's annual earnings while it cuts its budget debts and recover from increasing inflation (Jelmayer, 2015). According to Biller (2015), the currency in Brazil has fallen about 60% since the election of Dilma Rousseff as The President. The economy of Brazil remained stagnant from 2011 to 2014, and the Central Bank expects the Brazilian economy to contract in 2015 and 2016. Legal businesses and consumers have significantly lost confidence in the economy of Brazil...

Words: 581 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Brics

...The Brics’ role in the global economy Paulo Roberto de Almeida In: Cebri-Icone-British Embassy in Brasília: Trade and International Negotiations for Journalists (Rio de Janeiro, 2009, p. 146-154; ISBN: 978-85-89534-05-5). ∗ 1. Where do they come from and what are the Brics? In demographic terms, BRIC holds the world’s two most populated countries and another two with considerable populations. China alone holds a fifth of the world’s population, and is closely followed by India (17.5%) and, by a larger gap Brazil (2.9%) and Russia (2.2%). Despite their large territories – Russia’s 17 million km2, India’s 3.2 million km2, China’s 9.3 million km2 and Brazil’s 8.5 million km2 –, the Brics differ from each other in terms of natural resources, level of industrialization and impact on the global economy. It is important to point out these differences, as definition as a bloc might lead to wrongful assumptions about the four countries’ individual current and future roles in the global economy. In order to be accurate about each country’s actual weight in the world, we should perhaps change the acronym to CIRB (but without the glamour of the name). Let us begin with China, which is the most continuous civilization in history – not strictly in terms of political linearity but rather in terms of cultural continuity. The country has a tragic contemporary history, marked by economic decadence, political instability, military humiliation and social regression caused by a deep degradation...

Words: 3849 - Pages: 16