Free Essay

Britain 1945 to 1951

In:

Submitted By olympe2ker
Words 2087
Pages 9
To what extent did Britain change between 1945 and 1951?

The 1945-51 Labour Governments are often remembered for setting up the modern welfare state.
These governments passed many changes which aimed to protect everyone in Britain (rich or poor) from the ‘cradle to the grave’.

Before 1945 there was help available for people, including those introduced by the pre-World War I Liberal governments. However many people were still very poor and needed more help. Others felt that after a war they should not continue to live in poverty.
Indeed,British population knew some impacts that the War did on the economy and society. In fact,the government introduced central planning and the Ministries of Supply and Production organised the war industries. Coal mines and railways came under government direction. By 1945,83% of Britain's public expenditure was on military and defence requirements with the country also having to pay for war camage caused by aerial bombing and the loss of a signifificant part of the merchant naby. Britian had built up a 13£billion debt. World War II has also huge impacts on the society.
There was the rationing,policies changes,Air Raid Precautions,a rose of the employment of the women...
In 1942 a man called William Beveridge was asked by the wartime government to conduct a study into social problems in Britain at the time. The Beveridge Report (as it became known) was the basis for setting up the welfare state.
The Beveridge Report identified five major problems in Britain. They became known as the ‘Five Giants’ and were: - Ignorance (lack of education);- Disease (poor health); - Squalor (poor housing); -Want (poverty) and - Idleness (unemployment)

Even before Labour’s election in 1945, the wartime govrnment accepted the conclusions of the Beveridge Report. They began to put in places some changes. However it was the election of Labour – led by Prime Minister Clement Attlee - that really led to social action.
But... Why did the Labour Party win the 1945 General Election?
First,we can mention the electoral system . In fact,as a result of population movements,urban constituencies had an average of 6,00 fewer voters than rural and suburban constituencies. Labour traditionnaly received support from urban areas and the single majority system of voting exaggerated the scale of Labour's victory. In 1945,Labour won 383 seats with 47.8% of the bote while the Conservatives won 213 seats with 39.8% of the vote.

There was also an indoubtably desire for change. Indeed,the Conservatives had dominated the 1931-45 national government and many people wanted a change. There were strong memories of the Depression,and Labour's support of the Beveridge Report and its plan for nationalisation of major industries proved an attraction to the voters.

A final reason due to the victory of Labour was the Election Campaign. Moreover,Labour blamed the Conservatives for the appeasement in the late 1930's and accused them of helping to start World War II. Atlee received credit for his part in the war effort. He had been deputy prime minister from 1940 and came across as a moderate statesman. Also,the majority of servicemen voted Labour.
On the contrary,the Conservative Election Campaign was mainly based on Churchill's wartime leadership. Churchill was seen as a good war leader but he was thought to be a poor leader in peace time,and his warning that Labour would introduce Gestapo style police force backfired. Unlike Labour,the Conservatives lacked clear policies and produced their election manifesto in a few weeks. In addition,the Conservative Party organisation had declined during the War due,in part,to the military service of many party organisers.

In that way,we are going to talk about the background of fews Economics Reforms:
Britain had experienced central government control over the economy during World War II. Labour planned to ensure government control over the economy in peacetime. They created a planned economy where the government would control key sectors of the economy,like energy and transport.
Also,Labour was greatly influenced by the economic ideas of the Liberal economist Keynes. Keynes believed governments could control the level of inflation and unemployment through increasing public expendure or taxation. Keynesain demand management economics was the dominant economic view from the end of the World War II to 1975.

Then,an other economic reform was the nationalisation. The nationalisation of industries was also an influential change made by the labour government. In 1946 the Bank of England and civil Aviation was nationalised by the labour government and in the next three years coal, Cable and Wireless, Transport, electricity, Gas and Iron and steel followed these. Some of the industries that were nationalised by labour were not carried through very peacefully for instance the nationalisation of iron and steel. The proposal to nationalise this industries was strongly opposed by the conservatives and the steel masters. However the nationalisation of other industries such as coal was a positive change made by labour. This was because the takeover of coal meant that the employees would receive more money from the government then they would do with it being private with the employer being able to decide how much it pays them .Nationalisation involded 20% of British industry.
Economic growth was also helped by the US Marshall plan,which amounted to 1,26billion £ beteween 1945 and 1952. As well,a devaluation of the pound in August 1949 from 4,03£ to 2,80£ made imports dearer and exports cheaper. Finally,there was a wage restraint by trade unions,which kept business lost down.

The economics reforms had several repercussions on the jobs and the unemployement.
The government believed that the country – not private companies - should control important industries such as coal mining, steel works and the rail network. As such Labour took control of these industries at different times,it is actually the nationalisation.
Once the government owned these industries this meant the government could use tax money to keep unprofitable businesses going. This meant that more people were in work. Apprentice numbers could be high too. This helped tackle idleness.
Many of the improvements after nationalisation helped people already in work, not create new jobs. For example paid holidays were introduced in the coal industry.
The Labour government also introduced new laws to improve working conditions. The 1947 Dock Labour Scheme tried to end the temporary nature of dock work. This meant people could be more attracted to work in difficult jobs.
However as with nationalisation these changes mostly benefitted people already in work. It did little to create work. Some argue it put firms off hiring extra staff too as it was more expensive.

Thanks to Labour's Government,news socials seforms are implemented:
One of the major is about the health and the solutions set up for overcome diseases in Britain. Labour created the welfare state,a comprehensive plan to provide free education and healthcare for all the population. The 1944 Bulter Education Act laid the foundations Health was the main Labour reform and was run by Ernest Bevan.This provided free health care for the first time but quickly became overwhelmed by demand.
The 1945-51 governments are remembered for many things but the most famous is setting up the NHS in 1948. The National Health Service aimed to eradicate the Giant of disease by offering healthcare to all.
The NHS had three aims: ,Universal access ,Treat all medical problems and last :Free at the point of use. Before this more than half of the British population had no medical cover, meaning they often went without.
Although the NHS was set up to be free, the costs were too high. Eventually charges were introduced in 1952, prescription charges. Also, many hospitals were out-of-date and in a poor condition.

The Education also changed a lot against the ingorance.
Under the Education Act, all children sat an exam age 11 (called the 11+). Those that passed went to better schools, meaning they could get better jobs. Those that failed went to schools where they received technical training. The 11+ (or ‘qualy’ in Scotland) was criticised because children that failed often remained stuck in poverty. Many others argued that it was unfair to base a child’s future on one exam taken at age 11.
The Education Act The 1944 Education Act was designed by the wartime government, although brought by Labour to tackle ignorance. The Act aimed to improve education by raising the school leaving age to 15, meaning all children would get at least a secondary education.

An other social reform is about poverty who concerned the population and their wants.
In 1945 the newly-elected Labour government brought in the Family Allowances Act. This was to help tackle ‘want’. The Act gave weekly payments to all mothers with two or more children. The payment was 5 shillings per week for each child (except the oldest).
The Family Allowances Act was a huge help to families where the husband had been killed during the war. Also as it was paid directly to the mother it was felt that this would make it more likely to be spent on household items.
This last one was hugely helpful to many – but it did not help families with only one child. Also the payment stopped at 18 which often forced the young person to work, rather than continue with their education.
The 1946 National Insurance Act built on the work started by the original Act in 1911. All working age people had to pay money to the government each week, which led to them being given help when they needed it.
People could get sickness and unemployment benefit, an old age pension (women at 60, men at 65) and other benefits such as maternity and death grants. This was a far more generous type of welfare cover than ever before.
Weekly contributions were around 5% of earnings, a lot to the very poorest people. Not everyone was protected by the new law e.g. selfemployed people, married women, etc. Pension levels were still low.
Many people could not afford to pay National Insurance, so in the 1948 the National Assistance Act was introduced. This allowed poor people to apply for extra financial help if they needed it.
This Act meant that the very poorest – who would have missed out on help – were given assistance £2 per week for married couples. This was especially helpeful for elderly people that did not qualify for a pension. Many people complained that people who had not paid anything were receiving government benefits. Also it was means-tested and not universal, which many felt went against the spirit of the welfare state.
The government tried to tackle the problems of overcrowding and slum housing by building new houses. In 1946 the New Towns Act was launched. This aimed to end the Giant of squalor.

Also ,housing and squalor are examinated by the reform of Labour Government..

The Act aimed to improve housing by building new towns across Britain in nicer areas than crowded cities. 14 new towns were built by 1951, creating new homes and communities: East Kilbride, Glenrothes, Livingston, Milton Keynes.
There were few jobs or facilities such as shops created in the new towns. This meant that although people could live there they often faced long journeys to travel to work or to socialise.
The government announced plans to build 200,000 new houses each year. Most would be available for rent and so were available to workers. Pre-fab houses were built and jobs were created to make them.

Many new houses were built but less than the 200,000 per year which was promised. This meant that overcrowding continued and there were long housing waiting lists.

In conclusion I believe that the changes made by the labour government where very profound. The introduction of the NHS was such a profound change because it tackled the problem of disease well because enabled all classes to receive medical treatment. However I feel that the changes the labour governments made towards education were not profound in anyway. This is because the only real significant change made by labour was the age of leaving school was raised to 15.Although the introduction of national insurance was a huge change made by labour because it provided a safety net for the working class. It’s the work done by labour on Health and National insurance that shows that the changes they made were profound and benefited the British people.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

To What Extent Was There a ‘Post War Consensus’ in British Politics from 1951 to 1964?

...To what extent was there a ‘post war consensus’ in British politics from 1951 to 1964? (900 Words) Whether or not there truly was a ‘post war consensus’ in British politics from 1951 to 1964 is a highly debatable topic of which historians can often appear to be in two minds about; on one hand, Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson infamously described the period as ‘Thirteen years wasted’, whereas historian Robert Blake (a supporter of the Conservatives’, regards it as a ‘Golden age of growth’. The likes of Kevin Jeffrey’s even argue that consensus had even started before the war. Overall, the central issue was the idea of a mixed economy. If we were to argue that there was indeed a post war consensus in British politics from 1951 to 1964, it would be easy to turn straight away to the legacy of the feats in Clement Atlee’s government policies from July 1945 to October 1951. Atlee’s policies were for the most part successful, leaving him with a reputation of having led a government which actually attained its goals. Perhaps the most prominent part of Atlee’s legacy was the establishment of The National Health Service and The Welfare State, establishments which arguably meant that, despite the long run of Conservative dominance in the years following Atlee’s departure, both society and politics would remain in the Labour mould; Conservative party members proved far less hostile to the concept of a Welfare State due to its popular success, and they were well aware that to revoke...

Words: 920 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

1984

...Welfare Britain 1945-51 The New labour government 1. The most influential were Ernest Bevin, foreign secretary, Herbert Morrison, lord president of the council with considerable powers over home affairs, Hugh Dalton, Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Stafford Cripps, president of the board of trade. The welfare state 2. The purpose of the welfare state is democracies were increasing the powers of the state to improve people’s lives, especially the lives of those living closest to poverty. 3. The money fund the welfare state is come from higher taxation. The national insurance act 1946 4. Every citizen was entitled to sickness and unemployment benefits, old age pensions (women at 60, men at 65) widows and orphans pensions, maternity allowances and death grants. 5. The national insurance act is successful, becusess it provided a safety net for those who dell through the mesh provided by the National Insurance Act. The National Health Service 6. The NHS is provides healthcare for all UK citizens based on their need for healthcare rather than their ability to pay for it. It is funded by taxes. Aneurin Bevan is in charge of it. 7. He agreed that consultants should keep the right to private practice and that GPs should be paid not by an annual salary but according to the number of patients on their lists. 8. The NHS is successful in its first two years, because the need to be met that expenditure in the first two years was 40per cent higher than estimated...

Words: 685 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Criticall Discuss the Beveridge Report in Shaping the Post 1945 Welfare State

...the Beveridge Report in shaping the Immediate Post 1945 Welfare State. In 1834 the Poor Law Amendment Act was introduced. The Amendment Act was aimed at ensuring the poor and needy had homes, food and clothing. Homes, food and clothing where provided in return for labour in the work houses, adults and children worked for several hours in the day. The children did receive education in the work houses, in return for their labour. The aim was that the outcome of being unable to support yourself or family was so harsh and severe, that it would stop anyone from wishing to enter (The National Archives, 2014: 1). The Second World War saw a shift from the Poor Law to the Welfare State through the Beveridge Report. “No one, not even Beveridge himself, ever planned the Welfare State, nor has it been a direct outcome of any political or social philosophy”, (Bruce, 1961: 13). “It has been in fact no more than the accumulation over many years of remedies to specific problems which in the end have reached such proportions as to create a new conception of governmental responsibility”, (Bruce, 1961: 13).” The Beveridge Report of 1942 was the culmination of a review of the whole of social security provision in Britain commissioned by the Wartime National Government”, (Alcock, 1987: 51). The Wartime National Government only set out to tidy Britain up, not to make the huge changes Beveridge reported were required. Beveridge found that Britain had five giant evils to slay. Want (poverty), idleness...

Words: 2184 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Churchill - 1945

...The wind of change blew strongly over the British Isles in 1945. The great wartime hero, Winston Churchill is no longer the country’s leader, in spite of his great effort and success overseas during the war. The right-wing Conservative leader thought to remain prime mister, expecting public gratitude. However, the English vote for parties, not people. There was a demographic impact within Britain that led to the swing of leadership from a more capitalist based party to a more socialist based party. The people of Britain were haunted by the 1930s, a world in which “seldom the all-importance of food is recognized. You see statues everywhere to politicians, poets, bishops, but none to cooks or bacon-curers or market gardeners”, as described by Orwell. A time in which the poor were overlooked and undermined, a land in which the people “bred in the slums can imagine nothing but the slums.” Why was Churchill, being the national hero that he was, rejected by the Britons? Was it the failure of the Conservatives, which gave rise to Labour; or was it the rise of Labour which led to the failure of the Conservatives? These are some key aspects that this essay will attempt to consider. This paper will focus on how the rise of Labour, through their efforts locally, won over the population in order achieve a significant victory. Conducive to that change in leadership was the lack of Tory focus on social-policy and attention towards the working-class, which emanated from the lack of party...

Words: 1883 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Winston Churchill Research Paper

...Winston Churchill was born on November 30th, 1874. He lived in an aristocratic family, and eventually married Clementine Hozier on September 12th, 1908, with whom he had five children. He had a long and impressive military career, which involved fighting in at least 5 countries. He also participated largely in military politics, serving in the parliament off and on until 1939. He became the British Prime Minister in 1940, and served until he resigned in 1945. He won the general election of 1951, and again became prime minister until he resigned in 1955. He retired until his death in 1965. Winston Churchill was born into the family of the Dukes of Marlborough to Jennie Jerome (Lady Randolph Churchill) and Lord Randolph Churchill. They were...

Words: 989 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

American Hegemony

...Although this debate will not be further explored in this paper – it was decided to use the term “Persian Gulf” as it is most commonly used – this paper will delve deeper into the transition from British to American hegemony in the Persian Gulf and review how various aspects of this are described and interpreted in the literature. This paper will deal with this transition between the years of 1945, the end of the Second World War, and 1971, the year that the British completed their military withdrawal from the Persian Gulf. Even though the Americans were interested in the area before the WWII, the year 1945 was chosen as a starting point because the war had severely altered the power equilibrium between the great powers the United States of America and Britain were considered as at that time. During the Cold War, which started in 1946 the importance of the region was on the rise, both because of the oil and because of the containment policy against the Russians. The relevance of the region was on the rise for America in particular because the power of Britain was waning in the post-war era. Britain, faced with economic hardship, imperial fatigue, and events of humiliation such as the Suez Crisis of 1956-57, was entering the dawn of its empire, something that was slowly sinking in with both London and Washington. The process of the replacement of the British by the American hegemony was not always equally obvious, but it was a slow but steady intensification of American inters tint he...

Words: 6767 - Pages: 28

Premium Essay

Cold War Paper

...conclusion of the Second World War and the atrocities associated with the war, the world believed it was the end to major hostilities between countries. The defeated Axis powers (Germany, Japan, and Italy) were quickly demilitarized, allowing the victors, the Western Alliance (United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union) to decide their fate. Due to the difference in worldly ideals and the weakness of the alliance between the United States and the Soviet Union, the two countries quickly became adversaries. This aggression between the capitalist driven United States and the communist propelled Soviet Union led to what is now known as the Cold War. Standard Operating Procedures Throughout the years 1945-1990, the United States and the Soviet Union battled for dominance as the number one power in the world. Every conceivable platform was a battleground for the two gigantic powers. From spreading their ideologies to different countries to a race to space, nothing was off limits. This led to a world full of distrust and suspicion at every corner. At one point a nuclear arms race began, leading all of humanity to believe it was on the brink of destruction. According to the video “Duck and Cover (1951)” produced by Archer Productions and sponsored by the U.S. Federal Civil Defense Administration, it was common knowledge to the U.S. citizens of an imminent threat posed by the Soviet Union. It projected to children that any day a nuclear war could become a reality, what specific dangers...

Words: 395 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Why Did Winston Churchill's Defeat In World War II?

...rallied the British people during WWII, and led his country from the getting defeat to victory. In these paragraph I will be talk about who he led this country from getting defeated in WWII. Before every thing with Hitler in WWII happened,Churchill was a leading advocate for British rearmament. By September 3, 1939, the day that Britain declared war on Germany, Churchill was appointed first lord of the Admiralty and a member of the war cabinet, and little later, became chairman of the Military Coordinating Committee. On May 10, King George VI appointed Churchill as prime minister and minister of defense. Quickly, Churchill...

Words: 490 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Korean War

...which included all the countries the US would defend against communist aggression. South Korea wasn’t included. Kim told Stalin and Mao about his intention to invade. Mao refused to make any guarantees of military support to Korea because he was focused on the threat posed by Jiang Jieshi’s. Stalin refused at first, but then after Acheson’s speech, the Soviet leader approved. Stalin made it clear to Kim that, if the US became involved, the USSR wouldn’t intervene directly to help him. Stalin thought that since the US hadn’t intervened to prevent Mao’s victory in China, it was unlikely to aid South Korea. Questions 1) Korea lost its independence in 1910 when it was taken over by Japan and remained as a Japanese colony until August 1945. Japan surrendered to the US and Soviet troops had moved into South and North Korea, which had been temporarily divided at the 38th parallel for the purpose of dealing with Japanese troops. 2) June 1950 – July 1950 On June 25th 1950, North Korean troops invaded the South in a bid to re-unite Korea by force. On hearing the news from Korea, Truman immediately ordered US forces in...

Words: 747 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Challenges to the Post-War Consensus in the Thatcher Years

...during the Thatcher years? The post war consensus was the period of political history which emerged in the difficult years following World War II. Britain returned home victorious from war but in a state of social and economic un-rest. The people of Britain had a strong sense of solidarity at this time and begun to reject previous decades’ laissez faire philosophy and non-interventionist government policy. The population’s expectations of the state were high and people had a clearer understanding of the relationship between the state and its citizens. It is argued that attitudes changed due to new accessibility to information people had, such as the Beveridge Report, and they wanted the government to respond (Titmuss, 1950). The public pushed for a greater state intervention to ensure the economic and social wellbeing of the citizens. One of the main policies of the post war consensus was the evolution of the new welfare state which was based on the principles of equal distribution of wealth, equality and the public responsibility for those unable to provide a decent standard of living for themselves. This new collectivist approach covered areas such as education, unemployment, health, housing and poverty that were thought important to overcome to enjoy a reasonable standard of living. The post-war consensus prevailed from 1945 until the election of the Conservative government led by Margaret Thatcher in 1979. Thatcher challenged the welfare state mainly through privatisation...

Words: 1853 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Winston Cheurchill - Biographical

...Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill, KG, OM, CH, TD, DL, FRS, RA (30 November 1874 – 24 January 1965) was a British politician who was the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1940 to 1945 and again from 1951 to 1955. Widely regarded as one of the greatest wartime leaders of the 20th century, Churchill was also an officer in the British Army, a historian, a writer, and an artist. He is the only British Prime Minister to have won the Nobel Prize in Literature, and was the first person to be made an honorary citizen of the United States. Churchill was born into the aristocratic family of the Dukes of Marlborough, a branch of the Spencer family. His father, Lord Randolph Churchill, was a charismatic politician who served as Chancellor of the Exchequer; his mother, Jennie Jerome, was an American socialite. As a young army officer, he saw action in British India, the Sudan, and the Second Boer War. He gained fame as a war correspondent and wrote books about his campaigns. "Churchill" redirects here. For other uses, see Churchill (disambiguation). At the forefront of politics for fifty years, he held many political and cabinet positions. Before the First World War, he served as President of the Board of Trade, Home Secretary, and First Lord of the Admiralty as part of the Asquith Liberal government. During the war, he continued as First Lord of the Admiralty until the disastrous Gallipoli Campaign caused his departure from government. He then briefly resumed active army...

Words: 1295 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Why Did The Fall Of Singapore Change Australia's Foreign Policy?

...Australia were in partnership with Great Britain, as they had enormous amounts of respect towards the country. Australia viewed Great Britain as the “Mother country” and though that teaming up with them would give them the best outcome of war. This was not the case, on March 26th 1942, Australia only wanted to work with America. Australia wanted the efforts of the United States of America’s soldiers and John Curtin created...

Words: 955 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Churchill: the Man, the Myth, the Legend

...Royal Society, Royal Academian) was a British politician. He was prime minister of the United Kingdom during most of World War II (1940-1945) and again from 1951-1955. His impact on World War II was almost immeasurably huge. He did after all lead the people of Great Britain against the Nazis, without him the Nazis would have been much harder to defeat, not only would Great Britain most likely have been knocked out of the war, the Nazis would have then been able to focus all their attention on the Soviets, which could have then proven too much for the Red Army to Handle. When Great Britain declared war against Germany, Churchill was made First Lord of the Admiralty and a member of the War Cabinet, the same position he had held during the First World War upon being informed of this, the Board of the Admiralty the British Fleet a signal saying “Winston is back”. Churchill Argued for a preemptive occupation of Norway early on in the war, this was however shot down by then British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and the rest of the War Cabinet, such action wasn’t taken until after successful German invasion of Norway, an event it seems Churchill saw coming. On May 10, 1940, only hours before the German Blitzkrieg invasion of France, it became painfully obvious that the country had little to no faith in Chamberlain’s abilities to govern Great Britain during the war and so Chamberlain resigned. The most commonly accepted version of the events that followed was that the position of...

Words: 1486 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Adolf Hitler Research Paper

...then proceeded to annex Austria and parts of Czechoslovakia. Under the Munich Agreement of 1938, the West accepted this.” . He invaded Scandinavia, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Belgium in 1940. Hitler also ordered bombing raids on the United Kingdom, with the goal of invasion. Germany had formed an alliance with Japan and Italy, known collectively as the Axis powers and was signed to prevent the United States from supporting and protecting the British. The Holocaust finally ended When the Allied forces finally invaded Germany in 1945, Adolf Hitler knew he had been defeated. Howard 4 Several weeks after the Holocaust, Hitler committed suicide. “Between 1945 and 1951, in the aftermath of the Holocaust, the United States (along with Great Britain) was the guardian of more than one million displaced persons (DPs) in the occupied zones of Germany, Austria, Italy, and Czechoslovakia, including 250,000 Jews at the peak period in late 1945. The United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Agency and various private relief agencies assisted the western Allied powers in meeting this enormous challenge.” This being said, the United States continued to suffer after the Holocaust because they had to be the new home to 1-million people while Germany suffered by mourned the loss of their ruler who created mayhem around the world for several years. They also had a huge target on their back after killing millions and invading several countries. Hitler made several promises to Germany, such...

Words: 837 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Prime Minister

...Malaysia (Father of Malaysia). Tunku who is the seventh prince and twentieth child of Sultan Abdul Hamid Halim Shah was born in Istana Pelamin , Alor Setar in Kedah on February 8, 1903. His mother was Che Manjalara who is the fourth wife of Sultan Abdul Hamid. In 1909, Abdul Rahman was sent to a Malay Primary School Jalan Baharu and was later transferred to study at the Government English School in Alor Star, which currently known as the Sultan Abdul Hamid College. Abdul Rahman was then sent to Debsirin School in Bangkok in 1911. Then, he returned to Malaya in 1915 and continued his studies at Penang Free School. He graduated from St. Catharine’s College in Cambridge University with a bachelor degree of Arts in law and history in 1925. In 1951 Abdul Rahman became the president of UMNO and in 1955,he became the first Chief Minister of Malaya. As UMNO President, he has successfully solved many political issues in the Federation of Malaya, with various races cooperation. As a result, he succeeded in forming an alliance between the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO), the Malayan Chinese Association (MCA) and the Malayan Indian Congress (MIC) and this was known as the Alliance, Party. Under Tunku Abdul Rahman, the country successfully transformed from colonialism to independence. Tunku had successfully brought the country to independent on 31 August 1957 without bloodshed instead through a spirit of nationalism. Tunku made several visits to a few neighbouring countries...

Words: 1518 - Pages: 7