Bugusa

In: Business and Management

Submitted By homeworkinc1
Words 256
Pages 2
Yes a tort was committed it is defamation, because the company put out a statement to a third party the specific name of this defamation is called defamatory declaration which is defamation that happens when a person or company creates a fabricated, poor announcement about a third party, that assaults his or her personality.

















Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter)-Stephanie
Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walter’s actions.







Scenario: BUGusa, Inc., Plant Parking Lot-Vontice
What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc.? Explain your answer.







Scenario: BUGusa, Inc. (Randy and Brian)-Gwinnette
What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc.? Explain your answer.

Randy committed a tort of negligence in speeding and colliding with Brian’s vehicle. He did not intentionally hit him but his speeding contributed to the accident. Randy was negligent in his driving BUGusa, Inc.’s vehicle. BUGusa’s defense could be held under absolute privilege. This states that all federal officials have immunity in the Constitution via the “speech and debate clause” and BUGusa contracts with the federal government as well, making them a federal official as well.






Scenario: BUGusa, Inc. (Sally)-Gwinnette
Sally may have a successful case against BUGusa, Inc., for what torts? Explain your answer.

This could be a case of negligence. BUGusa knew that the wires needed insulators and they failed to make sure that all defective merchandise was replaced to avoid injury. Very similar to when a car has a defect and is recalled. They should have made sure all product was recalled also.…...

Similar Documents

Bugusa

...Yes a tort was committed it is defamation, because the company put out a statement to a third party the specific name of this defamation is called defamatory declaration which is defamation that happens when a person or company creates a fabricated, poor announcement about a third party, that assaults his or her personality. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter)-Stephanie Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walter’s actions. Scenario: BUGusa, Inc., Plant Parking Lot-Vontice What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc.? Explain your answer. Scenario: BUGusa, Inc. (Randy and Brian)-Gwinnette What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc.? Explain your answer. Randy committed a tort of negligence in speeding and colliding with Brian’s vehicle. He did not intentionally hit him but his speeding contributed to the accident. Randy was negligent in his driving BUGusa, Inc.’s vehicle. BUGusa’s defense could be held under absolute privilege. This states that all federal officials have immunity in the Constitution via the “speech and debate clause” and BUGusa contracts with the federal government as well, making them a federal official as well. Scenario: BUGusa, Inc. (Sally)-Gwinnette Sally may have a successful case against BUGusa, Inc., for what torts? Explain your answer. This could be a case of negligence. BUGusa knew that the wires needed insulators and they failed to make......

Words: 256 - Pages: 2

Law421 Bugusa Inc

...University of Phoenix Material BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. WIRETIME has carried out an intentional business associated tort generally known as Defamation. In this case all 4 factors of defamation are there. A defamatory declaration was made; it was displayed to a 3rd party, the declaration was very particular to one organization, and it put a negative frame of mind to BUGSusa Clients. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain. In this case, WIRETIME has carried out a Tortuous Interference with Current Contractual Relationship Tort. WIRETIME had prompted Janet to break the present agreement with BUGSusa for their job. WIRETIME had unique understanding of and actually saw the agreement. They definitely interfered with the agreement and created losses because of training an alternative for Janet. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter) Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walter’s actions. The kind of liability to BUGSusa in this situation is known as Scope of employment. In this case, the security guard carried out the tort of False Imprisonment on Steve. Though Steve wasn't behaving appropriately, neither was Walter because of the thin line of restricted...

Words: 457 - Pages: 2

Bugusa Inc

...University of Phoenix Material BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. WIRETIME, Inc. (WIRETIME) has committed trade libel.   WIRETIME’s advertisement satisfies the three conditions of trade libel as defined by our text (Melvin, 2011, p.212):   1. Clear and specific reference to the disparaged product.   WIRETIME makes defamatory statements about a specific company [BUGusa (BUG)] as well as to the specific product that BUG manufactures (BUG’s electronic recording devices).   2. Disparaging statement made with either knowledge that the statement was false or reckless disregard for the truth.   WIRETIME’s statement that BUG’s electronic recording devices are low quality and do not work reliably for longer than one month is reckless disregard for the truth.   We have no proof referenced in this scenario ascertaining the truthfulness of WIRETIME’s statement, but we can demonstrate that they published this statement with malice, or reckless disregard for the truth, with the intent of making BUG’s customers believe that BUG manufactures a low quality, unreliable product, thus driving away BUG’s customers and influencing them to use WIRETIME’s product as an alternative.   3. Communicated to a third party.   By advertising the disparaging statement, WIRETIME communicated...

Words: 826 - Pages: 4

Bug Usa Scenario

...University of Phoenix Material BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. Defamation was carried out in this scenario, it was a tort and it was intentional. In the defamation that is shown within, there are 4 total factors shown, defamation only has 4 factors. Wiretime unleashed to a third party a declaration in a defamatory way. There were a lot of specifics involved in the declaration making for this one organization to be pointed out by what was said. Harm was in fact done to the clients of BugUSA. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain. There was in fact a interference of tort in this particular case with a relationship tort that was most current and contractual. Janet was prompted to get out of the agreement currently with BugUSA by WIRETIME. This particular agreement was understood by WIRETIME and they had actually seen the agreement. Losses definitely arose since Janet's now open spot needed a trainee, as well as the agreement being meddled with. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter) Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walter’s actions. BUGusa could face false imprisonment torte from Walter’s actions. False imprisonment is defined as “intentional infliction of a confinement upon another...

Words: 550 - Pages: 3

Bugusa, Inc.

...Case Scenario: BUGusa, Inc. Learning Team D LAW/421 March 31, 2014 Tom Poulton   The United States legal system provides certain rights and protections for intellectual property, which could be useful to BUGusa, Inc. The kind of property that results from mental labor are considered intellectual property. “Rights and protections for owners of intellectual property are based on federal patent, trademark and copyright laws and state trade secret laws” (AIPLA.org, Para. 1). Patents protect inventions of tangible things; copyrights protect forms of written and artistic expression; and trademarks protect a name or symbol that identifies the source of goods or services (AIPLA.org). WIRETIME, INC. Advertisement WIRETIME, Inc., has committed a tort which is “a civil wrong where one party has acted, or in some cases failed to act, and that action or inaction causes a loss to be suffered by another party” (Melvin, S.P., 2011, p. 208). When WIRETIME placed an ad in a well-known industry magazine containing statements that BUGusa, Inc.’s electronic recording devices were low quality and did not work reliably for more than 1 month, they did commit a tort. This is considered defamation, but more specifically libel because they printed the ad, which states that the company has bad quality products when they have no facts to base that on. In Janet’s case, WIRETIME, Inc., committed a tort called Interference with Current Contractual Relationship, which means, “the third party...

Words: 725 - Pages: 3

Nagle

...University of Phoenix Material BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. Wiretime has not committed any torts to my knowledge because Bugusa equipment was not working as it supposed to so that the company could use it as an option. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain. The contractual relationship the company and Janet have that interfered with Wiretime. Nevertheless Wiretime can sue Bugusa because of them losing their employee Janet and any damages with company. Bugusa Inc has proof of the contract that was broken so Wiretime has interfered with the contract being broken Wiretime has losses to Bugusa so tort was done. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter) Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walter’s actions. Bugusa liabilities they had with Walter actions are tort intentional of the negligence and employee of employees. Because of the actions Walters has made he must be responsible for his own action. False imprisonment was made when Steve was kept for hours and threats only made this case with Wiretime and Walter much worse. If Walter would have told the information to supervisor then the actions of Steve could have been prevented. Scenario: BUGusa...

Words: 450 - Pages: 2

Bug Usa

...University of Phoenix Material BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. After reviewing the four areas that must be met for a defamation tort, I feel that it does qualify for a tort. Defamatory statement – this was met. WIRETIME, Inc. had a statement published in a well-known magazine that can be interpreted as remarks that were meant to harm the reputation of the plaintiff. Dissemination to a third party – this was also met. The Restatements indicate this element requires the information to reach the eyes or ears of someone besides the tortfeasor and the victim. In this case, each person that purchased or even looked at the publication was subjected to the material. Specificity was met, the statement published in the magazine targeted BUGusa Inc. product. Damages can also be met if BUGusa, Inc. has lost a client or potential customer because of the information published. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain. This situation qualifies for the Business Competition Tort. There was an employment contract (restrictive covenant) between Janet and BUGusa, Inc. that specified she would not go to work for a competing firm during the time period of her contract regardless of the reasons for her leaving her employment with...

Words: 468 - Pages: 2

Chemically Treated Beef

...Case Scenarios Keeva Montgomery, Rhonda Conley, Brittany Bradshaw, Kasey Keith, Deon High's LAW/421 July 30, 2014 Robert Wright Case Scenarios University of Phoenix Material BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. Yes, Disparagement such as belittling occurs where Wire Time makes false statements regarding the quality of goods or products electronic recording devices, that may cause loss of business to BUGusa Inc. False or fake negative reviews of a product may also constitute disparagement. BUGusa also have a Libel claim, which the harmful statement written in the magazine stating that the electronic recording devices were low quality and did not work for more than one month. This tort, formally known as defamation, is a statement communicated to a third party that harms a person business. There are two ways, which this can happen libel and slander. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain. Yes, Wire Time talked Janet into breaching the contract with BUGusa with cash 10% increase and a signing bonus of 5,000; Janet and Wire Time Interfered with BUGusa Inc. contract rights generally when a meddling third party convinces Janet to breach its contract with BUGusa. However, it can happen if a...

Words: 382 - Pages: 2

Bugusa

...Addressing International Issues John Hardnett LAW/421 August 19, 2014 Robert Phillips Some of the legal issues involved in resolving in legal issues international are changes in legislation, clash of interest, and ethical dilemmas. When business partners breach the contact and don’t have the best interest of the US Company in mind. If the foreign company is not making the quantity or the products to the patent specification. The practical considerations of taking legal action against foreign business partners based in other countries is when the contract that was written is not being following. If the foreign partner does breach the contract you want to try and resolve the problem without having to proceed with legal proceedings. The WTO requires that foreign and domestic companies be treated equally certain nations tend to protect their domestic companies through veiled regulations. The contract between both parties should be written to have the best interest of both parties. Some laws that protect rights in the US don’t apply in other countries. Without proceeding with legal ramifications the company the American company can claim compensation from their foreign partners. Factors that could affect Cadmex decision to grant sublicensing agreements are the companies may not make the product to the required quality standards or production requirements. When local customs and laws conflict with the customs and laws of an organization operating abroad which will...

Words: 343 - Pages: 2

Law 421 Bugusa Inc.

...University of Phoenix Material BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. WIRETIME Inc has committed a Tort against BUGusa, assuming there is not data to support its claim. In the example given WIRETIME, Inc published in a magazine seemingly false claim about product quality and reliability. This advertising action qualifies as Defamation if BUGusa can prove loss of business and revenue over the comments. According to The Legal Environment of Business (pg.209) if the above conditions are true then the actions of WIRETIME, Inc meet the four elements in order to recover for a defamation action. Defamatory statement - This would be a statement from WIRETIME, Inc that BUGusa’s product is unreliable after one month (WIRETIME advertisement). Dissemination to a third party - This action is satisfied by WIRETIME, Inc. publishing their comments in an industry magazine. Specificity - If the claims are unfounded by WIRETIME, Inc, then this element is satisfied. Lastly if BUGusa can prove loss of business as a result of WIRETIME's advertising then the "Damages" element is satisfied. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain. I believe that WIRETIME, Inc. has not committed a tort. Janet had a two-year contract with BUGusa, Inc. and took a...

Words: 771 - Pages: 4

Bugusa, Inc. Worksheet Law/421 Version 2

...Bugusa, Inc. Worksheet LAW/421 Version 2 1 University of Phoenix Material BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the BUGusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. In the case of WIRETIME, Inc., tort has been committed. Per the reading, “a tort is when one party has acted, or in some cases failed to act, and that action or inaction triggered a loss to be grieved by another party” (Melvin, 2011). WIRETIME, Inc., made a defamatory statement about Bugusa, Inc.’s reputation. WIRETIME, Inc., also enlisted an ad in a well-known magazine that enclosed a statement alleging BUGusa for having bad merchandise. BUGusa doubtfully will undergo reputation or loss of clients due to the negative hoarding that WIRETIME, Inc., bashed. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter) Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walter’s actions. In this case, the liability BUGusa, Inc., may encounter for Walter’s actions is that he committed a tort when locking Steve inside a soundproof room and threatened him with physical harm. Keeping Steve in a soundproof room can be defined as false imprisonment. False imprisonment prohibits wrongful restraining, confining or detaining a person without that person’s consent (Penal Code 236). Criminal threatening sometimes...

Words: 1004 - Pages: 5

Week 3 Team

...University of Phoenix Material BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the Bugusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter) Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walter’s actions. BUGusa has liability for Walter’s actions when it comes to false imprisonment. Even though Steve was spying on BUGusa for Wiretime it does not give BUGusa the right to falsely imprison Steve. The parts of the tort that BUGusa are limited detention they are only allowed to hold Steve for a limited time and they held him for six hours. Walter also violated the coercion he forced Steve into a confession which is a violation of the tort. Scenario: BUGusa, Inc., Plant Parking Lot What defenses may be available to BUGusa, Inc.? Explain your answer. BUGusa may have a defense when it comes to the proximate tort. BUGusa had no idea that on that particular day and at that particular moment in the day the truck driver was going to get robbed. Also the company the truck driver worked for could have not sent him there now there has been an outbreak of robberies in that area. The driver also falls under the insurance of the company he works for not......

Words: 298 - Pages: 2

Bug Usa

...BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the BUGusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Steve and Walter) Discuss any liability BUGusa, Inc., may have for Walter’s actions. Walter’s actions are unacceptable in every way. Walter committed false imprisonment by holding Steve for 6 hours in a sound proof room and questioning him. 6 hours is very unreasonable. If Walter would have contacted the police about the matter, then holding Steve until police arrived would have been a different story. Walter also committed assault against Steve. By saying he will hurt Steve if he doesn’t tell him everything, is a criminal action. Being a security guard, maybe armed even, Im sure the threat was not taken lightly. BUGusa, Inc., is liable for Walters’s actions because it happened on company time, at BUGusa’s place of business. Also since Walter is in a supervisor roll. This falls under the term vicarious liability, which is defined as; Liability that a supervisory party (typically an employer) bears for the actionable conduct of a subordinate or associate (such as an employee). Scenario: BUGusa, Inc., Plant Parking Lot What defenses may be available to BUGusa,......

Words: 265 - Pages: 2

Law 421 Week 3 Case Scenarios: Bugusa, Inc Law421 Week 3 Case Scenarios: Bugusa, Inc

... 421 Week 3 Case Scenarios: BUGusa, Inc Resources: University of Phoenix Material: Case Scenarios: Bugusa, Inc., multimedia link located on the student website and Case Scenarios: Bugusa, Inc., Worksheet  Use the BUGusa, Inc., scenarios and your research to support your answers to the questions listed in the worksheet, classifying the types of torts in each scenario.  Submit the completed worksheet. Do not exceed 250 words per question. Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment. LAW 421 Week 4 Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker Read the "Theory to Practice" section at the end of Ch. 6 of the text.  Answer Questions 1 through 6 based on the scenario in the "Theory to Practice" section, and complete the following in your response: * At the end of the scenario, BTT states that it is not interested in distributing Chou's new strategy game, Strat. Assuming BTT and Chou have a contract, and BTT has breached the contract by not distributing the game, discuss what remedies might or might not apply. * Explain your answers and refer to Section 7-6 in Ch. 7 for support.  Submit your answers.  Your responses must contain the question numbers or questions, so that your responses to each question can be clearly identified. Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment. LAW 421 Week 4 Bi-Weekly Reflection Discuss the common contracts that you and your teammates have encountered in your personal and professional lives. Your discussion should include the......

Words: 911 - Pages: 4

Eth 321 Week 3 Bugusa

...ETH 321 WEEK 3 BUGUSA To purchase this visit following link: http://www.activitymode.com/product/eth-321-week-3-bugusa/ Contact us at: SUPPORT@ACTIVITYMODE.COM ETH 321 WEEK 3 BUGUSA ETH 321 WEEK 3 BUGusa, Inc. Case Scenario Case Scenarios: Bugusa, Inc. multimedia link and University of Phoenix Material: Bugusa, Inc. Worksheet Use the BUGusa, Inc. scenarios and your research to support your answers to the questions listed in the worksheet, classifying the types of torts in each scenario ETH 321 WEEK 3 BUGUSA To purchase this visit following link: http://www.activitymode.com/product/eth-321-week-3-bugusa/ Contact us at: SUPPORT@ACTIVITYMODE.COM ETH 321 WEEK 3 BUGUSA ETH 321 WEEK 3 BUGusa, Inc. Case Scenario Case Scenarios: Bugusa, Inc. multimedia link and University of Phoenix Material: Bugusa, Inc. Worksheet Use the BUGusa, Inc. scenarios and your research to support your answers to the questions listed in the worksheet, classifying the types of torts in each scenario ETH 321 WEEK 3 BUGUSA To purchase this visit following link: http://www.activitymode.com/product/eth-321-week-3-bugusa/ Contact us at: SUPPORT@ACTIVITYMODE.COM ETH 321 WEEK 3 BUGUSA ETH 321 WEEK 3 BUGusa, Inc. Case Scenario Case Scenarios: Bugusa, Inc. multimedia link and University of Phoenix Material: Bugusa, Inc. Worksheet Use the BUGusa, Inc. scenarios and your research to support your answers to the questions listed in the worksheet, classifying the types of torts in...

Words: 891 - Pages: 4