Free Essay

Bullying

In: Business and Management

Submitted By kulasa
Words 5806
Pages 24
Literature Review Sample on Bullying
Posted by Vic Fabe at 7:40 PM
Chapter 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
This part of the study will be discussing the relevant literature connected with the study of the bullying in high school. This part of the study accounts the works that has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. All this would allow the readers to map the field and position your research within the context. Moreover, this part of the study justifies the reason for research. This is closely connected with demonstrating that is known in the field. It is the knowledge of the field that allows one to identify the gap, which the research could fill. Concurrently, it allows the researcher to establish the theoretical framework and methodological focus.
Adolescents in High School
Adolescence is an especially dangerous time of life. The onset of puberty produces biological changes that are certainly unprecedented, if not scary. The adolescent's body changes visibly, and while his appearance continues to change, his concept of self changes as well. The reception he receives from others changes, in addition to the way he responds to them. The boundaries once conceived of as permanent are uncertain and must be reconfigured. The adolescent will begin to see himself as having sexual drives and may feel great anxiety surrounding sexual matters. And in response to this myriad of intense feelings and changes, the adolescent presents himself as omnipotent and totally in control, lest anyone misperceive him for weak, confused, and searching for an identity. When their identities and body images are unclear, adolescents are especially sensitive to the way they are seen by others, especially their peer group. Here especially, the actual self is constantly being compared to the ideal self, a representation of what is important and valued by a particular group. The conglomeration of these factors makes adolescence highly susceptible to the development of shame. Additionally, adolescence is a period of time in which conflicts with parents are abundant. These conflicts are developmentally appropriate, as the individual is torn between wanting to please his parents and wanting to separate and differentiate his identity from theirs. This experience of feeling such opposing emotions may add to an already overwhelming sense of shame. Adolescence is confusing, in part, because self-consciousness is increased and personal differences are muffled. The primary concern for adolescents is how a wide circle of significant people sees them. This is much more important than who and what they themselves have come to feel they are (Erikson, 1985). When individuals who are experiencing shame enter adolescence, these painful feelings are exaggerated. Shame alone is often debilitating and adolescence alone is often debilitating. Put together, the combination is intolerable and often combustible.
Furthermore, Erikson (1963) considers identity formation to be the cornerstone of adolescent psychosocial development. Josselson (1987) offers this definition, "Identity, then is a dynamic fitting together of parts of the personality with the realities of the social world so that a person has a sense both of internal coherence and meaningful relatedness to the real world" (pp. 12-13). An alternative to identity achievement is identity diffusion, which occurs when adolescents are not able to commit to definite life choices. Erikson (1985) stresses that at least some role confusion is a "normative and necessary" experience for adolescents, but it can lead to a more dysfunctional state, such as an inability to fully experience intimacy, if an individual remains unable to move out of this period of indecision. Erikson notes several assumptions about the nature of identity. First, although identity development is particularly salient during adolescence, changes can and do occur earlier, in childhood, and later, in adulthood. Second, successful identity development depends in part on how earlier tasks during the life span have been resolved. Third, optimal identity formation can occur only when adolescents take an active role in their identity search and experience a normative period of moratorium, when they actively try out different roles without making a definite commitment. Fourth, identity development cannot be considered solely an individualistic process. Exploration and commitment are based in part on historical and contextual factors. Fifth, identity is neither static nor unidimensional. Erikson (1963) cites five facets of identity - sexual, religious, political, ideological, and occupational - and believes that individuals redefine these identities throughout the course of their lives. One of the strengths of adolescents, according to Erikson, is their capacity for fidelity to individuals or institutions. Adolescents, as a result of their search for identity, may be eager to make a strong commitment, at least temporarily, to new belief systems. Even though the rationale behind these belief systems cannot always be articulated, it does not decrease the passion that adolescents are capable of expressing for individuals or ideas. This sense of commitment has been found to be an important part of ethnic (Phinney & Tarver, 1988) and religious (Markstrom-Adams & Hofstra, 1993) identity development, as well as global identity (Waterman, 1985). Fidelity, similar to commitment in many ways, also includes a focus on expressing pride in being affiliated with persons or institutions, as well as placing high value on keeping promises and being faithful (Kitchener, 1983). It could also be argued that the development of a personal sense of fidelity serves as a protective factor for adolescents.
Concurrently, Garbarino, Kostelny, and Dubrow (1991) argue that the formation of a strong ideological identity is an effective buffer against extreme stress, especially if that ideology is based on tolerance for others, even an enemy. Humans are meaning-seeking organisms without meaning they tend to get lost and succumb to self-destructive or to antisocial behavior or to madness" (p. 22). Thus, self-construed ideologies may buffer against negative outcomes, both psychological and behavioral. Although identity development during adolescence has been the subject of considerable study, Waterman (1985) maintains that several of its dimensions have not been fully explored. This has resulted from a tendency, in both Erikson's writing and in the research on identity (Marcia, 1980), to treat identity as a global descriptive quality. An. adolescent is said either to have a clear personal sense of identity or to lack one, with each state viewed as having distinct psychological concomitants. Grotevant (1986) suggests that the study of identity should examine specific content areas, in those different identity domains of an adolescent's life "come into focus" in different periods. Previous studies have reported that a strong sense of self-efficacy was associated with better coping with stressors (Bandura, 1997). Thus, a high level of self-efficacy may prevent a potential negative effect of stress experience on bullying behavior, in addition to having a direct effect. To explore whether perceived efficacy might have a modifying affect, however, the first step would be to examine whether there is any association between stress experience and bullying behavior. Similarly, perceived social support and influence on decisions that are made, may be of importance in how the pupils react to a stressful environment (Karasek and Theorell, 1990). These factors may thus act as buffers in a potential association between stress experience and bullying behavior. However, they may also have a direct influence on how the pupils behave. Perceived social support have been observed to be positively associated with psychosomatic health (Bru et al., 1998; Natvig et al., 1999) and may be related to behavior as well.
Violence and Aggression
Violence and undesirable behavior among school children have received increasing attention the last years. Different aspects of associations between aggression and self-perceptions have also been explored. Some studies (Olweus, 1997) have observed associations between high degree of self-esteem and bullying or aggressive behavior. In contrast, one previous study (DuBois et al., 1998) found that high levels of global self-esteem were associated with more favorable scores on measures of adjustment, with fewer emotional and behavioral problems. Other aspects of associations between aggression and self-perceptions have been explored as well. Children with an aggressive attitude have been observed to rate their personal competence higher than their teachers and parents (Hughes et al., 1997). This finding is consistent with conclusions in a previous review (Baumeister et al., 1996), stating that violent behavior is associated with unrealistic favorable self-views that is contradicted by other persons (Baumeister et al., 1996).
A personal factor that partly overlaps with that of self-esteem is covered by the concept of self-efficacy. Self-efficacy comprises both a general and a more specific measure. The scale of general self-efficacy covers aspects related to self-worth. In view of similarities with the concept of self-esteem, high levels of general self-efficacy among the bullies may be expected. As concepts, however, self-efficacy and self-esteem differ somewhat. While self-esteem is viewed as a global concept with aspects of self-worth, perceived self-efficacy refers to beliefs in one's capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to produce given attainments (Bandura, 1997). A general lack of such self-beliefs may negatively affect a person's reaction pattern or attitude. Thus, low scores on the self-efficacy scales may be related to aggressive or bullying behavior as well. We have not found any previous studies exploring whether self-efficacy beliefs are related to bullying behavior. However, previous school related studies (Zimmerman et al., 1992; Zimmerman and Martinez-Pons, 1990) have found that high self-efficacy beliefs for self-regulated learning and academic goals were associated with better achievements.
Bullying Behavior
Bullying behavior is one part of the problem of school violence, covering both less and more severe types of violent behavior. Bullying is characterized by an aggressive behavior that is carried out repeatedly over time (Olweus, 1997). Typically, the bully is perceived as stronger than the victim. Personality characteristics of the bullies seem to be an important factor in explaining the problem of bullying (Olweus, 1997). Pulkkinen and Tremblay (1992) found that the bullies were aggressive, non social, and hyperactive. On the other hand, Olweus (1997) has reported that some bullies may be insecure and anxious, as opposed to the typical aggressive bully, in particular those who do not usually take the initiative to bullying when acting in groups. It has been reported that some bullies are also victims of bullying themselves (Craig, 1998; Rigby, 1998).
Some studies have focused on environmental factors at school in explaining the problem of bullying behavior. Typical factors have been school size and class size (Batsche and Knoff, 1994) as well as competition at school (Olweus, 1997). However, no significant relationships between these factors and bullying have been observed. Few previous studies have focused on the pupils' perception of different aspects of the school environment as potential risk factors for bullying behavior. Stress experience has been focused on in relation to the health of the pupils (Natvig et al., 1999), but less in relation to undesirable behavior. There are different ways of coping with stressful environments. Lazarus and Folkman (1984) have distinguished two types of coping functions as ways of responding to stressful events. One form of coping is problem focused or through direct action. This aims at confronting problem events directly by trying to solve them. The other type of coping is in tended to deal with the emotions aroused by the stressful situations (Lazarus and Folkman, 1984). Finding adequate ways of coping might be difficult for school adolescents. While some pupils can find acceptable ways of reacting, other pupils may have bullying as a way of reacting to an environment that they perceive as stressful.
Bullies are children who start fights with, tease, pick on, and dominate other children (Pellegrini, 1998). Large-scale investigations of bully/victim problems have been conducted in Scandinavia, Great Britain, Italy, and Australia (Olweus, 1994; Menesini et al., 1997; Rigby, 1996; Whitney & Smith, 1993). These investigations, especially the Scandinavian and British studies, have sought to define bullying, determine the prevalence of bully/victim problems, examine the effects of bullying on children, describe the family relationships among bullies and victims, and finally, identify effective components of school-based bully/victim intervention programs (Olweus, 1994). The purpose of this study was to further examine the family relationships of school-age bullies. Previous studies have found that the family relationships of bullies tend to be troubled (Olweus, 1994). In particular, parents of bullies are hostile, rejecting, and indifferent. Oftentimes, parents of bullies use inconsistent discipline by combining hostility with laxness. When parents of bullies do punish for child misbehavior, their punishment of choice is usually some form of harsh power assertion combined with violent emotional outbursts (Olweus, 1994). Finally, most bullies have weak to nonexistent father figures (Berdondini & Smith, 1996).
Externalities of Bullying
Previous research examining family influences on the development of children's aggression, which includes more generally deviant behaviors such as cheating, lying, and destroying property in addition to bullying of peers, supports the conclusion that poor parenting skills play a causal role (Kandel & Wu, 1995). More research, however, is needed to identify the precise mechanisms by which family members and family processes influence children's aggression, and especially children's bullying or aggression with peers (Ladd, 1992). This study draws on three bodies of literature: The literature regarding children's bulling and victimization; the literature regarding family influences on the development of children's aggression; and the literature regarding family influences on children's peer relationships. Putallaz and Heflin (1990) proposed a model that accounts for direct and indirect parental influences on the development of children's peer relationships. Direct parental influences are those, which influence children's acquisition of social skills and social behaviors. Direct parental influences include parental modeling, conditioning, and coaching of children's social interactions. Parental modeling refers to behaviors that parents engage in to form and maintain interpersonal relationships with other adults; namely their spouses, relatives, and friends. Parental modeling also refers to behaviors that parents use to guide or control their children. Behaviors modeled by parents are observed by children and then imitated within the context of peers. The literature regarding the development of children's aggression and the literature regarding children's competence with peers are replete with findings that support a modeling theory for parental influences on children's peer relationships. Specifically, in comparison to parents of non-aggressive children, parents of aggressive children model incompetence in relationships because they are more likely to experience angry, emotional disagreements with their children, spouses, and other adults (Elder, Caspi, & Downey, 1986); they are more likely to solve parent-child conflicts by using physical punishment (Eron & Huesmann, 1990; Kandel & Wu, 1995); and finally, they, especially mothers, tend to be isolated and have few friends (Patterson, 1980).
A second type of direct parental influence on children's peer relationships involves conditioning. Specifically, children develop positive or negative associations with social interactions based upon the affective quality of their relationships with parents (Putallaz & Heflin, 1990). Previous studies demonstrate that children, whose parents are agreeable, warm, and affectionate, tend to develop competence with peers (Brody & Flor, 1998). In contrast, children whose parents are disagreeable, hostile, cold, or rejecting tend to be at risk for the development of aggression, including bullying peers, and delinquency (Sutton, Cowen, Crean & Wyman, 1999). Similarly, parent-child involvement, which refers to the amount of time and activities that parents and children share together, influences how children view social interactions. Children who spend considerable time with their parents, especially in activities that are perceived as fun and pleasurable, have more opportunities to experience parental warmth and affection than children who spend little time with their parents in shared activities. Children generalize the positive feelings that arise from shared activities with parents to social interactions with non-family members. In support of this notion, children's lack of involvement with parents has been related to children's aggression and deviancy (Loeber et al., 1998). Finally, a third type of direct parental influence on children's peer relationships is parents' coaching of children's interactional strategies with peers. A previous investigation of young children and their mothers found that the frequency of conversations between mothers and their children about peer relationships is related to children's social preference, or likeability (Laird, Pettit, Mize, Brown, & Lindsey, 1994). In addition, mothers in the same study reported that common topics of mother-child conversations involved giving advice to their children about how to initiate a friendship or deal with bullying. Other studies have found that the quality of advice that parents give to their children is related to children's peer competence. For example, mothers who suggest prosocial strategies for how to deal with hypothetical peer provocations and rebuffs tend to have children who are rated as less aggressive by teachers than mothers who suggest neutral or unfriendly strategies (Mize & Pettit, 1997).
Indirect parental influences on children's peer relationships deal with how parents influence children's opportunities for social interaction. Rubin and Sloman (1983) describe indirect influences as ways parents set the stage for children's social interactions. Indirect influences reflect how parents determine contexts within which children's peer interactions occur. These contexts include neighborhoods, day care programs and schools. Indirect influences also reflect how parents arrange children's social contacts by scheduling parties, allowing for visits with friends, and encouraging participation in organized extracurricular activities such as youth sports, scouts, and music lessons.
The Bully-Victim Relationship
In the context of bullying and peer victimization, empirical findings have uncovered different factors that may explain the occurrence of bully/victim problems at school. Alongside children's psychosocial functioning (Olweus, 1994), it was observed that social environmental factors, such as the peers (Smith et al., 1993), the school (Mooij, 1998), and the home environment (Smith et al., 1993), contribute to the risk of peer aggression and victimization at school. Outcomes studies of anti-bullying intervention programs, focusing on the school environment, revealed a diverse pattern of positive (Olweus and Alsaker, 1991), moderate (Smith and Sharp, 1994; Stevens et al., 2000), and low (Pepler et al., 1994) effects. Besides other factors, it was argued that the limited focus on the relationship of the family environment to children's involvement in bully/victim problems at school contributes to the maintenance of the problem behavior (Stevens et al., 2001).
Furthermore, previous family studies on bully/victim problems primarily focused on children's perceptions of family dimensions. This research revealed significant differences between bullies, victims, and bully/victims. Bullies perceive their family as less cohesive (Bowers et al., 1992) and experience more hostility (Oliver et al., 1994). Peer aggression was found to be associated with an avoidant attachment history (Smith et al., 1993). Moreover, bullies perceive a strong power imbalance between father and mother, the fathers being more powerful. A power imbalance was also observed between siblings and themselves, the siblings being more powerful (Bowers et al., 1992). According to the bullies, their family encourages less autonomy (Rican et al., 1993), lacks structure, and primarily adopts rules that reinforce aggressive behavior (Oliver et al., 1994). For boys in particular, an association was found between bullying and inadequate communication structures in the family (Rigby, 1994).
Victims perceive their families as characterized by high levels of cohesion (Bowers et al., 1992) and low scores on negotiation (Oliver et al., 1994; Rican et al., 1993). An association was found between victimization and ambivalent attachment relationships. Compared with a group of controls, victims of bullying reported that their fathers had more power than did their mothers. They perceived siblings as being slightly less powerful compared to themselves (Bowers et al., 1992). Furthermore, it was found that victims perceive small differences on parental monitoring compared to control children, thus revealing a less accurate monitoring style (Bowers et al., 1994). Clear differences were found between boys and girls. For boys, it was found that victimization is associated with a negative relationship with the absent father in single-parent families. Victimized girls reported more negativism and hostility (Rican et al., 1993) and a negative relationship with the mother (Rigby, 1993). It was found that the famil y encourages less autonomy in girls (Rican et al 1993). Bowers et al. (1994) identified a distinct family profile for the bully/victim group. The bully/victim group included children that have bullied others and themselves have been bullied as well. These families have low scores on cohesion, although these scores were not as low as the cohesion scores of bullies. Bully/victim children perceive a power-imbalance between father and mother, again showing fathers to be more powerful than mothers. However, compared to bullies, victims, or control children, bully/victim children reported having more power for themselves. Furthermore, bully/victim children perceive less accurate monitoring and warmth, but more overprotection and neglect. It was concluded that these families are distinguished by inconsistent discipline and monitoring (Schwartz et al., 1997;).
Empirical work that investigated the perception of parents on bully/victim problems is limited. Olweus (1980) carried out in-depth interviews with parents of victims and bullies. Research questions were related to parenting style and parental interaction with their children. For the fathers and mothers of bullies (only boys), Olweus (1980) found high permissiveness toward aggression, harsher discipline, and power-assertive child-rearing methods. In bullies' families, he also observerd more negativism toward the child. For parents of victimized children (only boys), the interview outcomes revealed close contacts with and overprotection by the mother. Moreover, there was more negativism and a weak identification between son and father. Nonetheless, no studies are known on family characteristics of bully/victim problems using data from multiple reporters within 1 family (parents and children). Previous studies showed that reports of family interactions primarily show the perception of each respondent (Langhinrichsen et al., 1990). Consequently, it would be fruitful to involve parents' and child's perception directly in the study. Differences between family members in their perceptions of family characteristics were found in several earlier studies. They reveal only moderate congruence between parents and children (De Bourdeaudhuij and Van Oost, 1998). It also has to be taken into account that questionnaires have to be completed independently by family members. Questionnaires are often completed at home and sent to the researchers afterwards. This procedure undoubtedly leads to congruence scores between family members, which are unrealistically high (De Bourdeaudhuij and Van Oost, 2000). From this it could be argued that more research is needed to investigate characteristics of bullies' and victims' families including both the viewpoint of parents and the child. An important question is whether and how parents and children's perceptions on family characteristics are related. The family dimensions included in this study were derived from the previous perception studies on family correlates of bully/victim problems. It focused on general dimensions of family functioning and general child-rearing practices. In addition, problem-solving strategies of children and their parents in hypothetical bully/victim conflicts were included as a more specific measure of family interactions, In a previous study, Barrett et al. (1996) asked anxious, oppositional, and non-clinical children and their parents to interpret and provide plans of action for ambiguous scenarios. They found evidence of family enhancement of avoidant and aggressive responses in children.
Although dramatic acts of school violence are relatively rare, ongoing aggression and victimization are serious problems that arise in schools on a daily basis. For instance, research has found that 10-20% of kindergarten and elementary age children are repeatedly teased, threatened, or attacked by their peers (Leff, Kupersmidt, Patterson, & Power, 1999). A pattern of perpetuating milder forms of aggression or being the victim of such aggression in the preschool and elementary age years is associated with a number of difficulties in the elementary and middle school years (Kochenderfer & Ladd, 1996). Even more striking is the finding that early aggressive behavior is highly correlated with later aggressive behavior (Huesmann, Eron, Lefkowitz, & Walder, 1984) and is predictive of later antisocial behavior, including physical aggression, criminal behavior, and spouse abuse (Huesmann et al., 1984). Further, there is strong evidence that many severely antisocial youth exhibit a "life-course" development of aggression in which their childhood acts of aggression progress from being somewhat mild (bullying, teasing, and annoying others), to more serious (repeated physical fighting, gang membership), to extremely serious (assault, robbery, rape) (Moffitt, Caspi, Dickson, Silva, & Stanton, 1996). Thus, it is imperative to direct prevention and early intervention efforts to lessen the milder forms of aggression that occur frequently in the elementary schools and that can lead to more serious acts of aggression and outbreaks of school violence among middle school and high school students.
Even though school aggression has become one of the most pressing societal concerns, aggression statistics, research, and prevention/intervention efforts are difficult to evaluate due to a host of methodological difficulties (Tolan & Guerra, 1996). For instance, many prevention/intervention programs do not employ sound research designs such as a group design including a random assignment procedure, adequate sample size, and sufficient follow-up assessment. Second, many programs do not utilize a multi-method outcome evaluation protocol (Weisz & Hawley, 1998) or adequate procedures to assess treatment integrity and acceptability (Moncher & Prinz, 1991). Further, very few programs provide structured and user-friendly manuals and handouts (Moncher & Prinz, 1991), which may greatly affect the integrity and generalizability of the program. Thus, methodological considerations have limited the usefulness of many initiatives within the schools.
References:
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy, The Exercise of Control. Freeman,New York.
Barrett, P. M., Rapee, R. M., Dadds, M. M., and Ryan, S. M. (1996). Family enhancement of cognitive style in anxious and aggressive children. J. Abnorm. Child PsychoL 24: 187-203.
Batsche, G.M., and Knoff. H. M. (1994). Bullies and their victims: Understanding a pervasive problem in the sch. Sch Psychol. Rev. 23(2): 165-174.
Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., and Boden, J. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychol. Rev. 103(1): 5-33.
Berdondini, L., & Smith, P. K. (1996). Cohesion and power in the families of children involved in bully/victim problems at school: An Italian replication. Journal of Family Therapy, 18, 99-102.
Bowers, L., Smith, P. K., and Binney, V. (1992). Cohesion and power in the families of children involved in bully/victim problems at school. J. Fam. Ther. 14:371-387.
Brody, G. H., & Flor, D. L. (1998). Maternal resources, parenting practices, and child competence in rural, single-parent African American families. Child Development, 69, 803-816.
Bru, E., Boyesen, M., Munthe, E., and Roland, E. (1998). Perceived social support at school and emotional and musculoskeletal complaints among Norwegian 8th grade students. Scand. Educ. Res. 42(4): 339-355.
Craig, W. M. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Person. Individ. Diff. 24(1): 123-130.
De Bourdeaudhuij, I., and Van Oost, P. (1998). Family members' influence on decision making about food: Differences in perception and relationship with healthy eating. Am. J. Health Promot. 13(2): 73-81.
De Bourdeaudhuij, I., and Van Oost, P. (2000). Relative contribution of general family characteristics, diet specific family variables and personal diet determinants to the prediction of healthy eating in families. Psychol. Health 15: 751-770.
DuBois. D. L., Bull, C. A., Sherman, M. D., and Roberts, M. (1998). Self-esteem and adjustment in early adolescence: A social-contextual perspective. J. Youth Adolesc. 27(5): 557-583.
Elder, G. H., Caspi, A., & Downey, G. (1986). Problem behavior and family relationships: A multigenerational analysis. In A. Sorenson, F. Weinert, & L. Sherrod (Eds.), Human development and the life course (pp.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1985). The life cycle completed. New York: Norton.
Eron, L. D., & Huesmann, L. R. (1990). The stability of aggressive behavior--even unto the third generation. In M. Lewis & S. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychopathology (pp. 147-156). New York: Plenum Press.
Garbarino, J., Kostelny, K., & Dubrow, N. (1991). No place to be a child: Growing up in a war zone. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Grotevant, H. D. (1986). Assessment of identity development: Current issues and future directions. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1, 175-182.
Hughes, J. N., Cavell, T. A., and Grossman, P. B. (1997). A positive view of self: Risk or protection for aggressive children? Dev. Psychopathol. 9: 75-94.
Josselson, R. (1987). Finding herself: Pathways to identity development in women. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kandel, D. B., & Wu, P. (1995). In J. McCord (Ed.), Coercion and punishment in long-term perspectives (pp. 106-123). New York:Cambridge University Press.
Karasek, R., and Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life, Basic Books, New York.
Ladd, G. W. (1992). Themes and theories: Perspectives on processes in family-peer relationships. In R. D. Parke, & G. W. Ladd (Eds.), Family-peer relationships: Modes of linkage (pp. 3-29). New Jersey: LawrenceErlbaum.
Laird, R. D., Pettit, G. S., Mize, J., Brown, E. G., & Lindsey, E. (1994). Mother-child conversations about peers: Contributions to competence. Family Relations, 43, 425-432.
Langhinrichsen, J., Lichtenstein, E., Seeley, J., and Hops, H. (1990). Parent-adolescent congruence of adolescent substance use. J. Youth Adolesc. 19: 623-635.
Lazarus, R. S., and Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. Springer, New York.
Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Van Kammen, W. B. (1998). Antisocial behavior and mental health problems: Explanatory factors in childhood and adolescence. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
Marcia, J. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescence. New York: Wiley.
Markstrom-Adams, C., & Hofstra, G. (1993, March). The ego-virtue of fidelity: A case study of religion and identity formation in adolescence. Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, New Orleans, LA.
Menesini, E., Eslea, M., Smith, P. K., Genta, M. L., Giannetti, E., Fonzi, A., & Costabile, A. (1997). Cross-national comparison of children's attitudes towards bully/victim problems in school. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 245- 257.
Mize, J., & Pettit, G. S. (1997). Mothers' social coaching, mother-child relationship style, and children's peer competence: Is the medium the message? Child Development, 68, 312-332.
Moncher, F.J., & Prinz, R. J. (1991). Treatment fidelity in outcome studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 11,247-266.
Mooij, T. (1998). Pupil-class determinants of aggressive and victim behaviour in pupils. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 68: 373-385.
Natvig, G. K., Albrektsen, G., Anderssen, N., and Qvarnstrom, U. (1999). School-related stress and psychosomatic symptoms among school adolescents. J. Sch. Health 69(9): 362-368.
Oliver, R., Oaks, I. N., and Hoover, J. H. (1994). Family issues and interventions in bully and victim relationships. Sch. Counselor 41:199-202.
Olweus, D. (1994). Annotation: Bullying at school: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 1171-1190.
Olweus, D. (1997). Bully/victim problems in school: Facts and intervention. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. XII(4): 495-510.
Olweus, D., and Alsaker, F. D. (1991). Assessing change in a cohort-longitudinal study with hierarchical data. In Magnusson, D., Bergman, L. R., Rudinger, G., and Trestad, B. (eds.), Problems and Methods in Longitudinal Research: Stability and Change. Cambridge: University Press, Cambridge, pp. 107-132.
Patterson, G. R. (1980). Mothers: The unacknowledged victims. With commentary by E. E. Maccoby; with reply by the author. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 45, (5, Serial No. 186).
Pellegrini, A. D. (1998). Bullies and victims in school: A review and call for research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 15-176.
Pepler, D. J., Craig, W. M., Ziegler, S., and Charach, A. (1994). An evaluation of an antibullying intervention in Toronto schools. Can. J. Commun. Ment. Health 13: 95-110.
Phinney, J. S., & Tarver, S. (1988). Ethnic identity search and commitment in black and white eighth-graders. Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 265-277.
Pulkkinen, L., and Tremblay, R. E. (1992). Patterns of boys' social adjustment in two cultures and at different ages: A longitudinal perspective. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 15(4): 527-553.
Putallaz, M., & Heflin, A. H. (1990). Parent-child interaction. In S. Asher & J. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 189-216). New York:Cambridge University Press.
Rican, P., Klicperova, M., and Koucka, T. (1993). Families of bullies and their victims: A children's view. Studio Psychologica 35: 261-266.
Rigby, K. (1994). Psychosocial functioning in families of Australian adolescent schoolchildren involved in bully/victim problems. J. Fam. Ther: 16: 173-187.
Rigby, K. (1996). Bullying in schools and what to do about it. Melbourne,Australia: Australian Council on Educational Research.
Rigby, K. (1998). The relationship between reported health and involvement in bully/victim problems among male and female secondary schoolchildren. J. Health Psychol. 3(4): 465-476.
Rubin, Z., & Sloman, J. (1984). How parents influence their children's friendships. In M. Lewis (Ed.), Beyond the dyad (pp. 223-250). New York: Plenum Press.
Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., and Bates, J. E. (1997). The early socialization of aggressive victims of bullying. Child Dev. 68: 665-675.
Smith, P. K., and Sharp, 5. (1994). School Bullying: Insights and Perspectives. Routledge, London.
Smith, P. K., Bowers, L., Binney, V., and Cowie, H. (1993). Relationships of children involved in bully/victim problems at school. In Duck, S. (ed.), Learning About Relationships, Understanding Relationship Processes Series Sage, London, pp. 184-212.
Stevens, V., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., and Van Oost, P. (2000). Bullying in Flemish schools: An evaluation of anti-bullying intervention in primary and secondary schools. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 70:195-210.
Sutton, S. E., Cowen, E. L., Crean, H. F., & Wyman, P. A. (1999). Pathways to aggression in young, highly stressed urban children. Child Study Journal, 29, 49-63.
Tolan, P. H., & Guerra, N. G. (1996). Progress and prospects in youth violence-prevention evaluation (1996). American Journal of Prevention Medicine, 12 (Suppl. 5), 129-131.
Waterman, A. S. (1985). Identity in the context of adolescent psychology. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), Identity in adolescence: Processes and contents. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Weisz, J. R., & Hawley, K. M. (1998). Finding, evaluating, refining, and applying empirically supported treatments for children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27,206-216.
Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior, middle, and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35, 3-25.
Zimmerman, B. J., and Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. J. Educ. Psychol. 82(1): 51-59.
Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., and Martinez-Pans, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. Am. Educ. Res. J. 29(3): 663-676.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Bullying

...Bullying By: Melissa Maring Do you know how much bullying really occurs? Every seven minutes a child is bullied by peers, online, or at home. One hundred and sixty thousand teens do not go to school on any given day because they are afraid they will be bullied. What bullying use to be years ago is not what bullying is today. It has gone from just being peers in school, to expanding out to the internet. (Bullying Stops with Me) One question that people can confuse is: “What is bullying?” There is a difference between bullying and name calling. Bullying is a behavior that is unwanted and aggressive between kids in school that involves a child wanting to be more powerful. This behavior is normally repeated and can involve one or many kids. Bullying is more than verbally attacking someone. It includes making threats, physically attacking someone, spreading rumors, and even excluding someone from a group. (Bullying, 2013) (Stop Bullying, 2012) (Bullying, 2013) Everyone plays a role in bullying whether you are the bully or standing back and watching. The kid who bullies other kids could have many reasons for being a bully. They might think it’s the cool thing since their friends are bullies, or the child could be learning from their parents or siblings. A child that is a bully might have one of many reasons to be a bully. Family can play a large role on a child. If the child doesn’t feel loved by their family, aren’t disciplined or are overly disciplined, or are beat up by...

Words: 1503 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Bullying

...students can prevent bullying Situation: Schools turning to the law to handle bullying Bobby Newport Comp I August 22, 2012 Bullying in Schools Must Be Stopped by Students Bullying has become a major issue in schools across the nation with the numerous suicides caused by physical and verbal abuse that has led to the criminalization of bullying. Schools in all states, except Montana, have been given guidelines or Anti-Bullying laws to implement in their school systems. These laws define bullying and intend to reduce it, but where is the line going to be drawn? A snide comment to a passerby may be considered bullying but is definitely not criminal. These laws do not confront issues small as this yet, but in years past, most of us would never consider bullying as a criminal act punishable by law. Children in today’s schools are now going to have to think “more” about what they say because someone could call the police if they are sensitive. Bullying will always be an issue in schools even if parents get bigger bullies (the police) to bully the younger ones. If such laws continue to evolve children could be put into handcuffs. True bullies will evolve with the laws and may be able to use these laws for the benefit of their bullying ways. Bullying has evolved to make use of the internet through cyber bullying. Cyber bullying is using the internet through social networking websites to attack an individual. Facebook and MySpace have been major catalysts for bullying......

Words: 1237 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Bullying

...Bullying is so widely talked about in schools and communities today. Most students have had an experience with bullying. With bullying being talked about every day, I felt this was a topic I wanted to dig deeper into and research more about it. Besides researching more about bullying and broadening my understanding for it, my cousins had an experience with bullying and I saw how it affected them. I had a first-hand experience to hear the steps that were taking by the family, school, and administration. My cousin, female, who was in junior high at the time, was bullied by her female classmates daily. The family contacted teachers and administration for steps to be done to seize the bullying. Nothing was done by administration since two of the girls were their daughters and felt that they didn’t need to do anything about the situation. My cousin had to end up transferring schools to get away from her bullies and is now excelling in everything she is doing at her new school and has a great group of friends that really support her. I was appalled at the fact that nothing was done by administration even if it was their daughters. Bullying is bullying and no student should ever have to deal with it. My cousin was lucky enough to have a mother who is very involved in her school and life and did not stop raising concern and did not let it continue. At the time, they felt moving to a new school was the only option. Now we see stories on the news where students are......

Words: 3260 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Bullying

...How Does Bullying Have a Positive and/or a Negative Effect on Mental Health? EDF3610 Education in a Multicultural Society Florida Atlantic University Brooke Garber How Does Bullying Have a Positive and/or a Negative Effect on Mental Health? Issue: Does bullying create any psychological effects? How does bullying have a positive and/or a negative effect on mental health? Position: I do believe that bullying has psychological affects to a person's well being. I believe that bullying has a negative and a positive effect on mental health; therefore, I straddle the fence on this issue. Bullying is a growing epidemic that could lead to suicide, self-harm, and self-hatred. On the other hand, a person that is bullied might be able to build tolerance and stand up to that bully. Some children may possibly “bounce back,” but we hear countless stories of bullying gone to extremes, of teasing that ends tragically. According to Beck (2014), "Research shows that bullying victims have higher rates of self-harm, anxiety, and depression during childhood and adolescence" (Problem section, para. 1). Bullying comes in the form of either verbally assaulting face-to-face, direct hitting, indirect or other means that used to gain superiority. Good and bad comes from bullying, however I believe that bullying is more negative than positive on the effects of mental health. Today forms of bullying of escalated drastically due to the development of technology, which has become known as cyber......

Words: 2922 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Bullying

...Bullying: Effects on the Younger Generation Angela Ramsey COM/220 February 28, 2010 Christopher Geist “Being bullied is not just an unpleasant rite of passage through childhood. It’s a public health problem that merits attention. People who were bullied as children are more likely to suffer from depression and low self esteem, well into adulthood, and the bullies themselves are more likely to engage in criminal behavior later in life.” Duane Alexander, M.D., director of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). Have you ever been called names, tripped or hit, or made to do something you did not want to do out of fear? If you have, then you have been bullied. It happens every day and everywhere. There is no age group that cannot and has not been bullied. Even though bullying happens to people of all age groups, it can have lasting and sometimes disastrous outcomes for the younger generation. Bullying occurs when one person, or group of people, inflict harm on another person. Multiple forms of bullying exist in the world today. Name calling, teasing, taunting, physical harm, and threats are all ways to bully someone. Because of the age and inexperience of children (both adolescents and teenagers), they cannot handle the harassment. Both bullies and victims do not understand the effects that bullying can cause. Some of these effects may be short term, whereas others may lay dormant until the child becomes an adult. Therefore,......

Words: 2787 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Bullying

...Bullying is a nationwide problem especially among adolescents. Bullying is defined as unwanted or aggressive behavior that involves a real or perceived power imbalance. These behaviors are repeated or have the power to be repeated. Bullying includes threats, attacking someone physically, emotionally, or verbally, and/or excluding them from groups or activities. Bullying has the power to ruin or damage someone’s self esteem and cause them serious psychological issues. Another factor that plays a role in bullying is a persons’ sexual orientation or gender. Family interactions are also important. Victims of bullying often times have behavioral changes that can affect the entire family. As human services workers it is our job to protect and treat the people that be help. A victim of continuous bullying, can suffer serious mental damage that often times will lead to needing treatment. Going without treatment, can affect the family system as a whole. Without familial support and treatment behaviors can become out of control. The victims will be acting out in anyway that they can to try and suppress their feelings of isolation, or vulnerability caused by the bullying. The three types of bullying are physical, emotional, and verbal. Physical would be physically attacking or pushing someone. Placing your hands on another person or another persons property is considered physical. Verbal bullying consists of teasing someone or leaving them out of a group or an activity. Emotional......

Words: 545 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Bullying

...12 13 March 2012 Bullying Cannot Be Ignored Most people see bullying as “kids being kids”, but for Jamie Nabozny that was not the case. Students harassed, taunted, and teased Nabozny for being gay. The harassment started out verbally, but rapidly progressed into traumatizing physical and sexual abuse. The physical abuse was so severe that Nabozny couldn’t even use the school restrooms. One day while Nabozny was using the school restroom, several of his class mates came in and started harassing him. At one point Nabozny was pushed to the floor by one of the students, while kicked and urinated on by the others. The abuse did not stop there, it eventually became sexual. Male students would touch Nabozny inappropriately while whispering in his ear asking him if he liked it. When these situations were taken to the school administration they simply said “boys will be boys” and no one was held accountable (Documentary). School administration must enforce the Code of Conduct to ensure that all students feel safe. In Mark Brown’s article, “Life After Bullying”, he states that bullying is a serious problem. It is known that bullying has become a worldwide problem. “Bullying is a type of aggression in which the behavior is intended to harm or disturb, occurs repeatedly over time, and where an imbalance of power occurs, with a more powerful person or group attacking a less powerful one” (Nansel et al). “Younger children have a different definition of what bullying is, which changes......

Words: 2614 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Bullying

...Bullying is an ever-growing problem in our world today that affects all types of people in many different ways. The concept of bullying has always been around, but it has recently received national recognition when investigators found the reason behind the Columbine shootings in 1999 and many other such instances of violence were a direct result of bullying behaviors. (Juvonen & Elisheva 2013) It is a sad realization when we hear of someone killing themselves or others because of the hurtful behaviors they had become accustomed to. According to Webster’s Dictionary bullying is defined as an extreme, negative, and persistent form of emotional abuse achieved primarily through verbal and non-verbal communication. In order for the label of bullying to be applied to a particular activity, individual, interaction, or process it has to occur repeatedly and on a regular basis over an extended period of time. (Landy & Conte 2010) The act of bullying can happen anywhere and at any time, and no one is exempt from its reach. Recent studies and statistics have shown bullying is an enormous problem in today’s society; it is a form of abuse that can be done in a school environment, at the workplace, and even online. A recent article about school bullying showed that on a typical school day three out of 10 American youngsters are involved in bullying as offenders, victims or bystanders, and an estimated 160,000 children skip school every day for fear of being harassed. Also, bullied......

Words: 1381 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Bullying

...Technology Class: Public Speaking Lecture: Dr. Samantha V. Evans-Knowles Student: Sheila Petit-Phar Date: 15th November 2014 Topic: Cyberbullying Bullying has been around for ages throughout most countries. It seems like most people have some memory of a bully intimidating or making fun of them. For many, bullying happened at school, but it can happen anytime in one's life. Many positive changes have affected our lives thanks to the information and technology explosion. However, there have been some negative consequences of the rapid expansion of the Internet and communication technology. One of those alarming issues is a new form of bullying called cyber bullying. Like bullying, many people feel that cyber bullying is not a big deal.  This can occur through social networking sites like MySpace, Twitter, and Facebook, cell phone pictures and text messages, blog posts, or e-mails. Many feel that it is a normal part of life that people just need to deal with the best that they can. However, cyber bullying is something that should concern everyone. Cyber bullies use ruthless tactics and cyber bullying should be considered a crime because it is a form of harassment that causes victims to suffer feelings of depression, isolation, low self-esteem, humiliation, anxiety, and thoughts of suicide.  Cyber bullying is very harmful. Phoebe Prince was your average 15 year old—attending high school, worrying about boys, clothes, and most importantly, fitting into her......

Words: 1044 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Bullying

...Historically, in cases of peer-to-peer abuse, whether physical or emotional, the blame is laid on the belligerent boys or girls. The bystanders who hover, chime in, or squirm on the outskirts of the 'mean' action are dismissed as irrelevant. Also dismissed are those who spread the tale of the victim's woe through the grapevine. In truth, however, this supporting cast plays a significant role in peer-to-peer violence....Bystanders make or break bullying episodes." (Our Children) This article examines the role of the bystander in bullying incidents and outlines some strategies to help encourage young bystanders to act in these situations. OUR CHILDREN Nov./Dec. 2003, pp. 8-10 Reprinted with permission from National PTA. Article originally appeared in OUR CHILDREN magazine, Vol.29, No.3, November/December 2003 pp. 8-10. The Bystander: A Bully's Often-Unrecognized Accomplice By Margaret Sagarese and Charlene C. Giannetti A few years ago, an upstate New York newspaper headline noted that 60 high school girls and boys, ages 14 to 21, faced criminal prosecution for leering at and cheering on two brawling 15-year-old boys. The headline and accompanying story startled us. What we found amazing about this news item was that the police were holding "the human boxing ring" accountable. The "innocent bystander" status usually accorded people on the periphery of such violence was ruled out. The furor over the Glenbrook North High School (Northbrook,......

Words: 5321 - Pages: 22

Premium Essay

Bullying

...ASSESSMENT DETAILS Unit/Module: Introduction to Contemporary Society Assessment Name: Bullying in schools Assessment Number: 1 Word Count: 524 DECLARATION I declare that this assessment is my own work, based on my own personal research/study. I also declare that this assessment, nor parts of it, has not been previously submitted for any other unit/module or course, and that I have not copied in part or whole or otherwise plagiarised the work of another student and/or persons. I also declare, if this is a practical skills assessment, that a Client/Interviewee Consent Form has been read and signed by both parties, and where applicable parental consent has been obtained. Bullying in schools is, a social issue which has been around for as long as anyone can remember. While in the past this issue has been recognised it has not been treated as seriously as it has been over the past three decades. The aim of this paper is to define bullying trace its historical roots and identify its social context. There are many complex definitions of bullying. A simple definition is the abuse of power by an individual or a group who are stronger towards someone who is weaker. What is this abuse of power? This abuse of the power can be described where someone has some form of power over another and uses that power to the detriment of the weaker individual. Ken Rigby (2007) states, “It occurs where there is an imbalance of power between people” (p. 15).......

Words: 804 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Bullying

...8/08/13 Bullying? What is bullying? It is the aggressive attack from those who have had an up and down life and pick on others to cope with the pain and suffering they have dealt with over the times. There are four kinds of bullying there is physical, verbal, covert and cyber. Some only think about the first two when they hear the word bullying but as you can see there are more and can be just as hurtful as the other ones. Thus, nobody really understands why it goes on, but it is a growing problem in the world today. Wither matter if you are rich, poor, black, white, smart, and dumb or whatever it can happen to you. Physical bullying, it is the act of hitting, kicking, and other assaults on a peer. Most of the people are boys who do the bullying but just as many girls are bully’s just as the boys are. Sometimes girls can be meaner then the boys and cause the same as much pain to others. Guys are more likely to commit more these bullying then girls. Girls are more likely to start rumors and make up stories about someone else. Either way you look at it still isn’t right. Verbal bullying, someone uses language to gain power over his or her peers, such as name calling and saying things about them that are not true. It also does not create any physical damage; this type of abuse can have lasting psychological impacts on victims. Parents can also be blamed for verbal bullying, when they tell their children they are slow and stupid can hurt a......

Words: 964 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Bullying

...Abstract Every day bullying incidents occur and most are ignored by parents, teachers, students, and our judicial system, when they all could be prevented. No one takes the time to stop, listen and address bullying and make them serve some type of punishment when this occurs. Most wait until it’s too late and many are threatened, injured, or even killed in schools, on buses, or in society in general. Throughout this paper, I will explain several types of incidents that have occurred and were ignored and how they were over looked by a higher authority. I will also include some ideas on how we can take further action into preventing tragedies from occurring if possible. Schools and court systems may say that they have a no tolerance level for bullying, but if you stop and think for a second, why do our children and adults still get bullied and it is often much easier for teachers and judicial systems to look the other way than to put a stop to it before it gets out of hand. Title: Bullying Can Occur At Any Age and Is Often Ignored When we hear the word “bully” we automatically think back to when we were school age children and have either been a victim of bullying or been a bully. The truth is that at one point or another we have all witnessed or experienced some form of bullying. Whether it have been committed at school, home, or in our communities, it is by far a pleasurable experience and can make a life changing impact on our lives. Today bullying is too often......

Words: 2446 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Bullying

...recorded in response to the poisonous plague of bullying. What is a bully? According to the Florida Department of Education, Bullying means systematically and chronically inflicting physical hurt or psychological distress on one or more persons. The department later defines it as an unwanted and repeated offense, which includes verbal and physical behavior, including any threatening, insulting or dehumanizing gesture , by student or adult, that is severe and pervasive enough to create an intimidating, hostile or offensive educational environment; cause discomfort or humiliation or unreasonably interference with the individual’s school performance or participation; and may involve, but is not limited to; teasing social exclusion, threat, intimidation, stalking, physical violence, theft, sexual, religious, and racial harassment, public humiliation ,and the destruction of property. Today, I will share with you, three steps that should be taken to secure nationwide legislation to protects America’s youth from bullying and to raise awareness on bullying. Almost every state in America has passed a law designed to combat bullying in schools. Schools already have policies on bullying, the trouble is most bullying is subterranean. Tim field’s states and I quote "Bullying consists of the least competent most aggressive person projecting their incompetence on to the least aggressive most competent person Bullying is a community problem, not a government......

Words: 449 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Bullying

...Argumentative Essay: Solution for Bullying Bullying is a big problem for children and young people that go through it. It knocks their self-esteem and makes them lose their confidence, and can make them dread going to school each day. In extreme cases, young people can become suicidal as a result of bullying, while in other very serious cases, it can get out of hand and lead to the bully murdering their victim. It’s also a huge problem for parents and teachers, because stopping bullying is a hard task and they often don’t know the best ways to go about it. There are three key elements to stopping bullying: educating the bullies, imposing greater sanctions for the bullies, and protecting the victim. The reason that bullies must be educated is that many of them are not aware of exactly how much they are hurting their victim. In serious cases, it is probably wholly deliberate, but even then, most bullies wouldn’t want their victim to become as suicidal as they have made them. Bullying can come in all sorts of forms and one that affects girls in particular is a group of so-called friends excluding them from everything. In cases like these, if the bullies understood that they had become bullies picking on a victim, they may think twice. The second way to deal with the bullies is to punish them. This could be the only thing that works for incredibly nasty people, because they will only care when it begins to affect them. Bullying often isn’t taken seriously enough; for example,......

Words: 470 - Pages: 2