HINA KHOWAJA
20676
B.E

CASE STUDY 9A
Drug testing of employees
Summary:
john lawn, the former director of the drug enforcement administration (DEA), supported mandatory drug testing, calling it “critical [i]n those occupation where either the public trust or public safety is involved”. He listed doctors, pilots, airlines, truck drivers, teachers as examples and urge the profession to develop their own rules and regulations for drug testing.
The percentage of employers who test employees for drug increased from 22% in 1987 to 67% in 2001.some employees have questioned the accuracy of the test and some employers note that employees can temper with the test result.
Because of the accusation and confusion the department of health and human services is expected to issue its employees drug-testing guidelines by the end of the year. The guidelines will dictate certain types of jobs for which employees must always be tested (pilot, conductors) and also provide procedures for conducting tests.
The federal government has Supreme Court approval for 113 drug testing programs but state law regulates private employer in the administration of their test. Some states limit testing to safety-sensitive jobs, other states require probable cause as a prerequisite for testing employees. A seatle equipment company worker complains: “ I am so tired of hearing that I have right to privacy. What about our right to safety?”
But Boston executives maintain, “Individual rights are too precious to be compromised by this route. Others ways must found to combat drug problems in the work place. Donald A Smith, jr wrote for marijuana and valium,” whether it be a private or public employer, a free-for all approach to drug testing cannot be tolerated.
Kim Haggart, a quality-assurance manager at dragon valves, in adopts the following position: “if the job is high-risk or safety sensitive testing should be required because impairment can affect the health and safety of others.

CASE STUDY 9B
Stake holder relationships, social responsibility, and corporate governance
Summary:-
Carla knew something as wrong when jack got back to his desk. He had been with aker & aker accounting (A&A) for seventeen years, starting there right after graduating and progressing through the ranks. Jack was a strong supporter of the company and that was why Carla had been assigned to him. Carla had been with A&A for two years. She had graduated in the top 10 percent of her class and passed the cgpa exam on the first try. She had chosen A&A over one of the “big five” firms because A&A was the biggest and best firm in smallville, Ohio, where her husband frank, managed a locally owned machine tools company. She and frank had just purchased a new home when things started to turn strange with jack, her boss.
She asked jack what’s the matter? He said ypu will hear sooner or later. I’ve been denied a partner’s position. Can you imagine I have been working for 60 or 70 hours weeks for the last ten years, and all the management can say to me is ‘not at this time’ complained jack. He also said I’ve done all that they have asked me to do. I’ve sacrificed a lot and now they say a few more years. It’s not fair. Six months later Carla noticed that jack was behaving oddly. He came in late and left early, on Sunday Carla went in to the office for some files and found jack copying some of the software that A&A used in auditing and consulting.
After few weeks later at a dinner party, Carla overheard a conversation about jack doing consulting work for some small firms. Monday morning she asked him if what he heard was true. Jack answered yes Carla it’s true. I have .few clients that I do work for an occasion.
Jack explain her about his extra bills, medical expenses and said that I cannot cover my medical problems that is why I have to work extra side. carla realized that jack is using A&A software for personal use. That’s stealing she said.

Question answers:-
1) Jack copying software of A&A used in auditing and consulting. Carla heard jack doing consulting work for some other firms. Company denied jack promotion as a partner yet he was so experienced and hard working.
2)
Option1:- Carla should report to the top level about jack and his activities. Option 2:- Carla should make jack understand that this is wrong and he should stop.
Option 3:- Carla should make talks between jack and management. Option 4:- support jack and his illegal activities.

3) Resign, talk to management, cheat, start own company , blow whistle and protect.
4) No