Free Essay

Business Forms 310.1.5

In: Business and Management

Submitted By Badgers24
Words 1701
Pages 7
Running head: Labor and Employment Law

Labor and Employment Law

As a Human Resource Director for Company X, I come across situations every day that challenge my decision making. These situations need to be handled in a delicate matter to make sure that the company is following the guidelines that are setup and established by the federal government to make sure that companies and employees are treated fairly. I would like to discuss three situations that recently have challenged my leadership as a Human Resource Director and show the diversity of the laws and why they were created and how they work.
Situation A – FMLA
The first situation I am about to describe is an unfortunate set of circumstances, but the law is very clear and the company position is easily seen. Therefore, it was not hard for me to make this decision. The employee was presented with a difficult family situation his twin children were born premature. He made the decision to take leave from work to attend to his spouse and the needs of his family. This is ok and totally understood by the company. Here is where the unfortunate part comes, the department manager at the time agreed to the let the employee take a leave of absence, but the proper paperwork was not filed for Family Medical Leave Act. Now to complicate matters worse, the department manager that was in charge of this employee left during the employee’s leave. Eleven weeks have gone by and the employee wants to come back to work and receive the pay he missed while attending to his family. As a human resource director there are many situations that fall into grey areas, and you have to look at all options and think through the best results for both parties involved. The definition of the Family Medical leave Act according to the Federal Government is “The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) provides certain employees with up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave per year.” It also requires that their group health benefits be maintained during the leave. FMLA is designed to help employees balance their work and family responsibilities by allowing them to take reasonable unpaid leave for certain family and medical reasons. It also seeks to accommodate the legitimate interests of employers and promote equal employment opportunity for men and women.” ("Family & medical leave," 2012). The company had many discussions about this situation. Since we had changed department managers, we agreed to let the employee come back to work at the previous rate of pay and at the previous position. This decision was made as the employee left in good standing and the company had no issues with his return. The back pay, if you would, has been denied for reasons that are clear cut. As tough as the employee’s situation is, the FMLA act was structured to help out employees take time away from their work during difficult times, but it clearly states that it is unpaid.” FMLA is designed to help employees balance their work and family responsibilities by allowing them to take reasonable unpaid leave for certain family and medical reasons. It also seeks to accommodate the legitimate interests of employers and promote equal employment opportunity for men and women. FMLA applies to all public agencies, all public and private elementary and secondary schools, and companies with 50 or more employees. These employers must provide an eligible employee with up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave each year for any of the following reasons: for the birth and care of the newborn child of an employee; for placement with the employee of a child for adoption or foster care; to care for an immediate family member (spouse, child, or parent) with a serious health condition; or to take medical leave when the employee is unable to work because of a serious health condition”. ("Family & medical leave," 2012) So, even if all the proper paper work was filed, which in this case it does not appear that it was and there was an agreement of some sort between the employee and the old manager, the company is not required to pay out the time away from work, even though the reason on why the employee was on leave was a qualifying criteria of the FMLA in taking care of his spouse and birth of a child. In closing, this situation was an easy decision to protect the company from a financial aspect. The company was still able to retain a good employee and he was able to return to his job and stay employed.
Situation B ---- Age Discrimination
The second situation that I would like to discuss was one that was as easy to solve. It was still difficult, as it did not paint the company in a good light. In the interest of fairness to the employees it had to be corrected. The department manager clearly did not award the correct employee the promotion strictly due to age, which is in clear violation of the employee age discrimination act of the federal government. The age discrimination act clearly states the following, “The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) protects certain applicants and employees 40 years of age and older from discrimination on the basis of age in hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation, or terms, conditions or privileges of employment.” ("Equal employment opportunity," 2012). The department manager had an employee that was 68 years old and was rated as an above average worker. When he asked why he was denied the promotion, he was told it was due to his age. This is clearly against the law, and had to be corrected. Regardless if the employee is going to retire two days after the promotion or has health issues after getting promoted, an employee can’t be held back or not promoted simply due to age. This situation I had to make right immediately. We needed to avoid a lawsuit by the employee and protect the company’s reputation as not to be shown as a company that is discriminatory.
Situation C ---- Americans with Disabilities
The third and final situation was probably the most difficult of the three situations I have had to face. It involved a candidate that had a disability and was qualified for the job. In order to get to some of the areas of the corporation two of the elevators were going to have to be modified. The company has four elevators in the building and two of the elevators were ok, but the two that the applicant would be using to perform the functions of their duties would have to be modified. In reviewing this situation, this is what has been discovered so far. The Americans with Disabilities act of 1990 states,” Reasonable accommodation is any modification or adjustment to a job or the work environment that will enable a qualified applicant or employee with a disability to participate in the application process or to perform essential job functions.” Reasonable accommodations also includes adjustments to assure that a qualified individual with a disability has rights and privileges in employment equal to those of employees without disabilities. Examples of reasonable accommodation include making existing facilities used by employees readily accessible to and usable by an individual with a disability; restructuring a job; modifying work schedules; acquiring or modifying equipment; providing qualified readers or interpreters; or appropriately modifying examinations, training, or other programs. Reasonable accommodation also may include reassigning a current employee to a vacant position for which the individual is qualified, if the person is unable to do the original job because of a disability even with an accommodation. However, there is no obligation to find a position for an applicant who is not qualified for the position sought. Employers are not required to lower quality or quantity standards as an accommodation; nor are they obligated to provide personal use items such as glasses or hearing aids.” ("Americans with disabilities," 2002). This is where the grey area comes in. If the company turned down the applicant with the disability claiming undue hardship but did not go into detail as to why; then those situations have to be documented. If the sole reason was that the two elevators would have to be modified may not be a justifiable reason to not hire the candidate. The cost of the modifications would be very expensive and our company considered claiming “undue hardship” due to the cost, which by federal government standards is a legal reason. "Undue hardship" is defined as an "action requiring significant difficulty or expense". ("Americans with disabilities," 2002). There were other ways around this issue, such as, can the candidate still do the functions by using the other two elevators? Is the candidate possibly willing to pay for or absorb some of the cost of the modifications? These items were discussed and though this situation was a difficult and many avenues were researched, we feel a conclusion has been made that is fair and legal to all parties. The decision was made to modify the elevators due to the fact that after further research the undue hardship was truly not a valid claim and here is why. “Undue hardship implies that there may necessarily be some hardship in accommodating someone’s disability, but unless that hardship imposes an undue or unreasonable burden, it yields to the need to accommodate.... Concrete evidence is required to establish undue hardship.” (Duhaime). In the end we hired a great employee and the accommodations paid for themselves.
So in closing being a human resources director brings different challenges every day and is a great way to interact with many types of people and situations. I hope this has taught you some of the situations you need to be aware of as you enter the business world.

Family & medical leave. (2012). Retrieved from Equal employment opportunity. (2012). Retrieved from Americans with disabilities act. (2002, May). Retrieved from
Duhaime. (n.d.). Undue hardship definition. Retrieved from

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Lit1 - Task 2 - 310.1.5-02, 11, 13 0912

...LIT1 - Task 2 - 310.1.5-02,_11,_13_0912 Family Medical Leave act of 1993 The Family Medical Leave act of 1993 (FMLA) ensures that personnel of companies with 50 or more employees, who work within a 75 mile radius of those in need of the leave, are able to take time off in order to balance their personal obligations with their employment commitment. An employee will qualify for family leave if • they need time off for a serious health condition • or a close family member requires care because of a serious health condition and • they have worked for their employer for at least 1 year • and they worked at least 1250 hours for the employer in that year • and they notify the company • and fill out the necessary paperwork in a timely manner The leave requested by the employee is unpaid and the employer must maintain the employee’s benefits during their time of leave. When the employee is able to return to work they must be restored to the position they held when they began their leave at the same pay and benefit rate. If the employee cannot perform the job function they performed at the time of the leave request they must be given an alternative position at their previous pay and benefit rate. In our case since Company X qualifies as a company that needs to abide by the FMLA requirements and Employee A met the requirements for time off to care for his wife and premature twins, Employee A was permitted leave from his employment duties for this purpose. On Employee......

Words: 1046 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Business Entities Ethical Socially Responsibility

...outreach and donations. When a company does something that is perceived to be socially irresponsible it can be bad for business, such as in the case of Company Q declining to give day old food to the area food bank. This paper will evaluate Company Q’s attitude toward societal responsibility and recommend three areas of improvement. Company Q, in my opinion, showed a lack commitment to social responsibility by not supporting the local area food bank. Situated in major metropolitan city, I believe their success came from the support of the people of the community and therefore obligates them to give back to that community. In addition it showed a major lack of consideration by insinuating possible fraud and theft from their employees. This unethical attitude displayed by Company Q now evidenced by its poor employee relations, is in trouble of a possibly poorer reputation with its customers, one that may not be profitable for business. If they are to improve their attitude toward social responsibility, I recommend the following three areas of improvement: 1. Ethical practices in their operations 2. Ethical treatment of employees 3. Community outreach and involvement (particularly with the food bank) Ethical Practices in Operations. Company Q closed stores in higher crime areas reportedly due to loss of revenues. There has been a wave of company exodus form the areas that support them.ojcdm...

Words: 1332 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Lit1 Task 310

...LIT1 Task 310.1.5-02, 11, 13: Labor and Employment Law In the United States, several laws have been enacted to protect the rights of workers and provide guidelines to employers. The Family Medical Leave Act of 1993, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, provide clear guidance to employers and employees when addressing workplace concerns. Employees and employers must understand the requirements of each law to ensure proper implementation and avoid conflict. Situation A Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) Congress enacted The Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 to balance the workplace and personal needs of employees (J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc., 2011). The act provides protection for employees needing to take time off to address personal health needs and those of immediate family members. The act also provides time off to men and women to care for a new baby. In addition, the act provides stability to employees. Before the law was enacted, many employees faced the prospect of job loss if personal or family health issues prevented them from working. Employers must offer job protection to employees as long as proper notification and documentation is provided. Eligibility. There are specific eligibility requirements for Family Medical Leave. An employee is eligible for twelve work weeks of Family Medical Leave if the company has more than fifty employees, who commute within seventy five miles of the work location. Leave may be......

Words: 1762 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Wgu Legal Issues

...LIT1: Task 310.1.5-02, 11, 13  Part A  Sole Proprietorship: This form of business is the most common form of new business startup. Legal and tax issues are basic and can be followed without significant assistance from external sources. The business and owner are one in the same and all liabilities will fall upon them personally. The primary key to being a sole proprietor is the owner maintains independence in the decision making of the business and how he or she implements their business plan.  LIABILITY:  Individual and the business are treated in the same manner. The sole proprietor holds responsibility is for all losses and profits and has the additional responsibility of being personal liable for all actions of the business. INCOME TAXES: The sole proprietor profits are taxed as their personal income with only minimal tax incentives compared to other business models. Business profits or in the case of losses must be reported as personal income tax.  LONGEVITY/CONTINUITY: Sole proprietorship can end their business at anytime without legal formalities.  CONTROL: An SP business is operated as a single business owner. The control of the business cannot be given to anyone else.  PROFIT RETENTION: The profits of the business belong to the owner of the business and are not shared.  LOCATION: A sole proprietor is not limited to where it can operate within the United States. Only localized codes and regulations can affect where the business can be located.  CONVENIENCE/BURDEN:......

Words: 4222 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Lwc1 Cos

...LWC1 - Fundamentals of Business Law and Ethics Course of Study Your competence will be assessed as you complete the LWC1 objective assessment for this course of study. This course of study may take up to 10 weeks to complete. Introduction Overview There are the two major subdomains of study within the Fundamentals of Business Law and Ethics Course of Study: business law and business ethics. The exam covers 11 business law and ethics concepts, including the following: contractual relationship government regulation of business dispute resolution labor and employment law hiring and employment practices warranties, negligence, and liabilities Sarbanes-Oxley Act ethical issues in business ethical leadership ethics programs use of company resources You likely have had some experience with the legal system, either through your own encounters or merely through listening to the nightly news, and you have probably read or heard about various ethical and legal issues causing financial upheaval in today's business world. This background will serve you well in this study. Now you can expand on that experience, and perhaps refine and enhance your own views on these issues. Once you complete this course of study, you will have demonstrated a level of competence that you can immediately use in your work setting and career. Outcomes and Evaluation There are 10 competencies covered by this course of study; they are listed in the "Competencies for Fundamentals of Business Law and Ethics......

Words: 8481 - Pages: 34