Free Essay

Business Law Criminal

In: Business and Management

Submitted By vianie
Words 3186
Pages 13
lawteacher.net

http://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/2-2-essays/criminal-liability-essay.php

Criminal Liability Essay

"Criminal liability and the justifications for, and objectives of, punishment are based on the notion of individual blameworthiness" In light of the above statement, consider whether imposing criminal liability on corporations for manslaughter is ever justified.

Introduction
English law has yet to come to terms with the conceptually difficult task of attributing liability for manslaughter to a corporate entity. The essential problem is that a corporation is granted an independent status by a pragmatic legal fiction which affords an identity to entity which has no physical existence. Salomon v. Salomon & Co. [1897] is authority on this point. This is done in order to allow the corporation to assume responsibility and rights in its economic activities and this device has proved extremely useful in encouraging commercial risk taking and entrepreneurial activity. However, problems arise when it is necessary to consider the question of the criminal liability of the corporation, because one of the fundamental precepts of criminal law is that of personal criminal responsibility. The way in which criminal law attributes liability is by ascertaining a mens rea (a guilty mind) and an actus reus (a guilty act) on the part of the accused. It is difficult to accuse a company of possessing a guilty mind, because it has no personal mind or conscience, and it is guilty of accusing a company of a guilty act, because it is a legal construct without any means of acting on its own behalf. Companies can only act vicariously through the actions of their human employees and representatives, and such individuals possess their own personal criminal responsibility which can be dealt with by the ordinary application of criminal law. The issue was brought dramatically to the fore in March 1987 when the Herald of Free Enterprise ferry capsized off Zeebrugge with the loss of 188 lives. Amid a public outcry and intense media pressure for effective sanctions P&O was accused of gross negligence and prosecuted for manslaughter over the incident but the case subsequently collapsed. Momentum gathered behind the cause for reform as the same fate befell attempts to sustain corporate prosecutions in the aftermath of the King's Cross fire (1987) , the Piper Alpha oil rig disaster in Scotland (where the equivalent offence is culpable homicide) (1988), the Clapham Rail crash (1988) and the Marchioness pleasure boat tragedy (1989). Over the years since 1989 there have been other tragedies too numerous to mention, but in not a single case was a large company successfully prosecuted for manslaughter.

Directing Mind Theory
Given that the company has no conscience or mind of its own, it has been suggested that the law should look to a senior representative of the company and attribute his or her state of mind to the company itself. This is a tenuous approach, because it undermines the fundamental rule of personal criminal responsibility, but it has received considerable academic support and comment. The traditional starting point in an analysis of the evolution of directing

mind theory is the dictum of Viscount Haldane in the civil case, Lennard's Carrying Co Ltd v Asiatic Petroleum Co Ltd [1915]. He stated: "A corporation is an abstraction. It has no mind of its own any more than it has a body of its own; its active and directing will must consequently be sought in the person of somebody who for some purposes may be called an agent, but who is really the directing mind and will of the corporation, the very ego and centre of the personality of the corporation." As stated, many commentators have championed the view that the directing mind concept provides a more coherent and just basis for corporate liability than agency or vicarious liability mechanisms. The theory was applied in a civil context in Rudd v Elder Dempster & Co Ltd [1933] and Wheeler v New Merton Board Mills Ltd [1933] which dealt with the liability of companies for negligence in factory operations which resulted in injury to employees. These cases concerned the question as to whether personal knowledge or wilful actions could be imputed to a corporation under the terms of the Workmen's Compensation Act 1923. Following Lennard's Carrying Co it was held that a company could only be deemed liable to its workmen for the negligence of its governing nucleus - namely its directors, managing director, general manager or other persons having authority from the board to carry out company actions. That said, it should be noted that in the later case of Wilsons & Clyde Coal v English [1937] , the House of Lords omitted to apply or even consider the directing mind theory when deciding on corporate liability for an unsafe system of work in a mine under common law and relevant legislation. In this case liability was imposed purely on principles of vicarious liability, even though the duty imposed on the corporate mine owner was found to be personal and non-delegable. In the case of H.L. Bolton (Engineering) Co Ltd v T.J.Graham & Sons Ltd, Lord Denning attempted to entrench directing mind theory at the heart of the law for the imposition of civil or criminal liability on companies. Lord Denning stated that companies: "'may in many ways be likened to a human body. They have a brain and a nerve centre which controls what they do. They also have hands which hold the tools and act in accordance with directions from the centre.' Therefore Lord Denning advocated that the means of determining the mind of the company was to identify its actual human controllers. He argued that a company's directors and managers represent the directing mind and will of the company, and that they control what the company does. He concluded that the state of mind of senior corporate officers is the state of mind of the company and that it should be treated by the law as such. Unfortunately, Denning's policy rendered it virtually impossible for corporations of anything other than a very small size to be successfully prosecuted because in most corporations of a significant size the personal responsibility for corporate affairs is divided between a number of directors and senior managers and as a consequence, no single human component of the company is responsible for sufficient of the mens rea and actus reus in order to found a criminal prosecution. In R v P&O European Ferries [1991] , the case concerning the discussed sinking of the Herald of Free Enterprise ferry off Zeebrugge in 1987, Turner J ruled at 83: "Where a corporation through the controlling mind of one of its agents, does an act which fulfils the prerequisites of the crime of manslaughter, it is properly indictable for the crime of manslaughter." This was a groundbreaking ruling in the specific context of corporate liability for manslaughter and it was elaborated on by Bingham LJ in R v HM Coroner ex parte Spooner , in proceedings also relating to the Zeebrugge accident. Lord Bingham stated: "For a company to be criminally liable for manslaughter... it is required that the mens rea and the actus reus of manslaughter should be established... against those who were to be identified as the embodiment of the company itself."

As stated, the prosecution of P&O failed notwithstanding these statements of principle by the courts. The main reasons why the case was unsuccessful were that the negligence within the company which resulted in a situation in which the ferry set sail from Zeebrugge leaving its bow doors open was shared among many individual employees of the company. Negligence was identified at all levels from the deck to the boardroom, but not in sufficient quantity in any one senior officer of the company to sustain a finding of criminal liability which could thereafter be imputed to the company itself. The combined factors of alienation and dilution have been blamed for this consequence. Alienation relates to the reality that senior officers of the company were distant both literally and in terms of responsibility from the action on the ferry that resulted in the ship setting sail in a dangerous condition. Dilution relates to the fact that because so many different human agents were involved in running the company, the individual responsibility and fault of any one person was diluted to a level below criminal liability because it was being shared between numerous other parties. An argument based on aggregation was proposed to circumnavigate these problems. This policy would permit a company to be found guilty of manslaughter due to the collective fault or blame of all the senior individuals who could be identified with the company. Therefore this prosecution argument suggested that different pieces of the corporate manslaughter jigsaw puzzle could be gathered together from different senior parties within the corporation so as eventually to form a complete picture of corporate guilt. However, Turner J in R v P&O European Ferries ruled that the company could be guilty only if one individual who could be identified with the company was himself personally guilty of the crime (with the requisite mens rea and actus reus). Bingham supported this line in the Spooner case. It could therefore be argued that the courts rejection of aggregation makes it plain that the organic identification doctrine articulated in Lennards Carrying and developed by Denning in H.L. Bolton (Engineering) Co Ltd is in fact no more than a form of vicarious liability. This conclusion would be in conflict with those of eminent commentators such as Wells and Gower , who describe directing mind theory as one that involves direct and not vicarious corporate liability. However, if it necessary to identify perfect guilt in one senior individual and then transpose the guilt onto the corporation itself it is submitted that this no more than a process of indirect vicarious liability - perhaps executive vicarious liability would be a good way to describe it. The first successful prosecution for corporate manslaughter came about in the case of R v Kite and OLL Ltd, . This case betrayed a shocking level of negligence and recklessness. The company in question operated an activity centre at Lyme Bay on the south coast of England. The prosecution arose from an incident in which four teenagers drowned on a canoeing trip. An investigation of the trip revealed an almost total lack of regard for safety by the company and hopelessly inadequate planning, preparation and supervision. The instructors were mostly unqualified and barely competent canoeists themselves. Some instructors could not even swim. The trip in question was a lengthy trip in the English Channel. The weather forecast was not checked, no distress flares no first aid kit and no spray decks were taken. No waterproofs and no tow ropes were taken. When the party failed to arrive at its destination on time, the alarm was not raised for several hours and when it was inaccurate information was given to the Coastguard. Moreover, the company had received letters from former employees criticising its safety standards and predicting a fatal accident. On the facts both the company and its managing director were found to be guilty of manslaughter by gross negligence. The company was a very small undertaking and its MD Peter Kite was therefore deemed directly implicated in the stated failings. This made it easier for the court to attribute liability to the company itself under the directing mind doctrine. This case emphasised the fact that the directing mind doctrine essentially establishes a system in which it is far easier to prosecute small companies than large companies for manslaughter, even where the levels of negligence and recklessness are equivalent. Notwithstanding the fact that large companies will typically have the capacity to kill many more people than small ones, they are likely to escape prosecution because criminal responsibility will be shared between many officers rather than being focused on one or two culpable parties. Peter Kite had a high degree of personal knowledge of the inadequacies of the safety systems and the consequent risks, therefore it was easier to

prove that he was reckless and grossly negligent in such a way that the company could also be made liable because he could be deemed its corporate alter ego. As Andrew Dismore MP was driven to comment in the House of Commons: "the bigger the company, the less chance of a successful prosecution...Safety awareness, and the great responsibility that it entails, should lie with those at the top - the chairman and the managing director - and not with the employees, such as train drivers or ship's crews, who are always put up as the fall guys." Since R v Kite and OLL Ltd there have been a handful of other prosecutions, but only some of those involving very small companies have proved successful. One such example is R v Jackson Transport (Ossett) [1996] where a director was jailed after the death of a 21-year-old employee who died after being sprayed in the face with a highly toxic chemical without the proper safety protection or training. However, whenever prosecution has been attempted on a grander scale, for example after the regular fatal train crashes the occur, such efforts have always resulted in failure.

Proposals for Reform
With public and media pressure mounting, in 1994 the Law Commission issued a consultation paper proposing the establishment of a regime dedicated to the attribution of corporate liability for manslaughter. Following extensive consultation, in 1996 the Law Commission published a report calling for the adoption of a new legal framework designed to impose liability more effectively on companies in circumstances where management failure could be identified as a cause of death. The report advocated the establishment of a new offence of corporate killing backed by unlimited fines. Specifically the Law Commission recommended: (1) the creation of a new offence of killing by gross recklessness; (2) there should be a separate offence of corporate killing, broadly corresponding to the individual offence of killing by gross recklessness; (3) that both offences should be constituted only where the defendants conduct in causing death falls far below what could reasonably be expected; (4) that in contrast to the individual offence, the corporate offence should not require that the risk be obvious, or that the defendant be capable of appreciating the risk; and (5) that for the purposes of the corporate offence, a death should be regarded as having been caused by the conduct of a corporation if it is caused by a failure, in the way in which the corporation's activities are managed or organised, to ensure the health and safety of persons employed in or affected by those activities. In its 1997 manifesto the Labour Party made a commitment to introduce legislation on the issue and soon after election victory Labour's new Home Secretary Jack Straw announced that the Government would, in substance, enact the Law Society recommendations. An interdepartmental working group was constituted to examine the practical impact of the proposed regime and this resulted in the publication of a Home Office consultation paper in 2004. The Law Commission found that it should not be possible for individuals to get caught in the crosshairs of the new offence, but the Government had no such reservations. The Law Commission argued that no individual should be liable to prosecution for the offence, even as a secondary party. Their stated aim was, first, that the new offences of reckless killing and killing by gross recklessness should replace the law of involuntary manslaughter for individuals; and second, that the offence of killing by gross carelessness should be adopted so as to fit the special case of a corporation whose management is one of the causes of a death. It was submitted that the indirect extension of an individual's liability, by means of the new corporate offence, would be entirely contrary to that purpose.

Concluding Comments
It has now become a regular mantra of the Home Secretary and Transport Minister, in the aftermath of any high profile fatal accident, to declare that the Government is pushing urgently ahead with proposals to implement a new law on corporate killing to address the weaknesses in the current common law corporate manslaughter regime. After every train crash, the headlines in the newspapers declare moves to bring in draconian new laws, but this has now been the case for almost two decades through both Labour and Conservative administrations. Clearly there are conceptual, philosophical and jurisprudential difficulties entailed in attributing what is in part moral liability to an artificial, unthinking entity, and fundamental principles of law would need adjustment to fit any new law into the traditional regime of criminal law. However there are well organised pressure groups, whose ranks are added to by every new disaster, calling vociferously for reform of the law and the media delights in championing their cause with a concerned public. It is pertinent to restate the quote incorporated in the title to this paper in closing: "Criminal liability and the justifications for, and objectives of, punishment are based on the notion of individual blameworthiness." This is undeniably true, because criminal liability has traditionally been predicated on the culpable behaviour of human beings. Inevitably there will be difficulties transposing this regime into a system capable of regulating the activities of corporations because they lack the physical and mental attributes of human beings, but it is submitted that it is not impossible to conceive of a new system which is sympathetic to the nature of the corporation while at the same time holding it properly and effectively to account for its actions. In the final analysis the ability to hold large corporations liable for deaths caused by gross negligence and recklessness can only serve to foster a keener corporate health and safety culture and that would seem to be justification enough for a sharpening of the law.

Bibliography
Sheen, Barry, Sir, (1987) Herald of Free Enterprise: report of Court no. 8074 formal investigation London: H.M.S.O for Department of Transport. Cullen, Hon Lord W. Douglas (1990) The public inquiry into the Piper Alpha disaster. London: HMSO. Fennell, J.D.A. (1988) Investigation into the Kings Cross Underground Fire. London: HMSO Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/ various documents Criminal Law: Involuntary Manslaughter, (1994) Law Commission Consultation Paper No.135. Legislating the Criminal Code: Involuntary Manslaughter, Law Com 237: March 1996. 'Six Disasters; 368 people dead; no successful prosecutions. Now the Government acts', 2 October 1997, The Independent. Reforming the law on involuntary manslaughter: the Government's proposals, Home Office: May 2000. Winn, C.R.N., The Criminal Responsibility of Corporations, (1927-29) C.L.J 398 Stern, Y.Z., Corporate Criminal Personal Liability - Who is the Corporation? (1988) 13 JCL 125 Wells C (1998), I Blame the Parents': Fitting New Genes in Old Criminal Laws, 61 Modern LR 724-739 Gower, Principles of Modern Company Law, (7th ed.), (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2003)

Order your own law essay Get a law essay quote Request the removal of this law essay

Order your own law essay Get a law essay quote Request the removal of this law essay

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Performance and Actions of Law

...Performance and Actions of Law Name Course Date Instructor Performance and Actions of Law Albert Einstein according to BrainyQuote once said, “Nothing is more destructive of respect for the government and the law of the land than passing laws which cannot be enforced,” (para. 1). Laws are intended to be a model and regulations make use of common sense. However, an individual may argue that a law is carried through ethics. Laws perform and actions enforce the law in business as well as in society. Meaning of Law According to Bryan Gates Attorney at Law (n.d.), “law is the set of rules that guides our conduct in society and is enforceable through public agencies,” (para. 2). Some rules of conduct according to Bryan Gates Attorney at Law (n.d.), “are considered so important that they are enforced through the government,” (para. 3). Fundamentally law is the benchmark and authority assist in executing conduct, supervising disputes as well as grasping illegal activity. Roles of Law The law delivers several directions in society as well as business. This is most credible in three arrangements. Criminal law is one classification where the law is a social charge of crimes and is arraigned by governing bodies (Melvin, 2011). Along with criminal law civil law is when private affairs may bring lawsuits against one another for wrongdoings (Melvin, 2011). For example, if an individual causes destruction to property or to a person the civil law would be the lawsuit that...

Words: 875 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Criminal Justice Major

...Controlling Organized Crime University of Phoenix CJA/384 March 20, 2012 Jessica Vesey Controlling Organized Crime Law enforcement agencies have always tried to control criminal organizations because when these organizations have strength in numbers it is difficult for agencies to get a handle on their activities and keep them from expanding further. The larger the organization the harder it is to monitor and control their behavior. Criminal organizations gain strength during times of economic hardship; one major example of this would be during the time of Prohibition. During that time whomever had the alcohol had the power and this was a time that organized crime flourished because they offered people that cooperated with them a part of the profits from this lucrative partnership. As long as there are situations in which a person or group can make more money doing something illegal, no matter what the risk, those people will take advantage of the situation to gain as money and power as possible. Especially since many of these organizations know that law enforcement agencies are limited on what they can and cannot do when it comes to breaking down the structure of the criminal organization. The best ways to try and control these organizations and stop them from continuing such illegal activities would be to establish harsher punishments and create a no tolerance policy for such organizations; while allowing agencies the ability to infiltrate the suspected organization...

Words: 1279 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Roles and Functions of Law

...Laws play a large role in society and in business. The function of law and how it is applied depends on if the issues are a intrastate or interstate and if local laws of federal laws need to apply. In commerce it varies and how those powers are applied can vary. In the example of Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. commerce powers show an example of how state laws were applied to advertising showing that the company could be liable for advertising that had a negative outcome. During the case Cipollone brought up that under state law the Liggett Group was involved in false advertising and was part of a conspiracy to withhold information about the dangers of smoking (Melvin, 2011). The argument the Liggett Group had was that federal laws in place preempted any state law (Melvin, 2011). The ability of courts to decide how commerce is handled comes from the commerce clause. In the case Gonzales v Raich 2005 according to Exploring Constitutional Conflicts “Congress first can regulate the channels of interstate commerce. Second, Congress has authority to regulate and protect the instrumentalities of interstate commerce, and persons or things in interstate commerce. Third, Congress has the power to regulate activities that substantially affect interstate commerce.” This means that businesses that conduct operations between different states fall under Federal guidelines, and the courts will often review the disputes based on the laws set by Federal precedents over those of state law...

Words: 834 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Legal and Ethical Issues in Business

...recognized as a criminal activity which causes serious social and economic damages. The traditional method of money laundering is through financial institutions. However, with the development of new science and technology the approaches of money laundering have become more and more diverse. This paper is discussing the legal and ethical issues which surround this topic, as well as, develop an analysis for the ethical concerns raised by the laundering of money. The writer will then provide explanations from at least three relevant areas of law that have been discussed throughout the course and assess each area as it applies to money laundering. Finally, the write will provide recommendations on this situation to reduce liability exposure and improve the ethical climate or the overall ethics of money laundering. Is money laundering a real problem in the world today? I. Introductions There are many ethical issues that can arise in the course of operating a small business. A comprehensive understanding of the different types of ethical issues will help you to identify and handle this situation’s responsibility to maintain core business values. Let’s look at this scenario for example, money laundering. This paper is discussing the legal and ethical issues which surround this topic, as well as, develop an analysis for the ethical concerns raised by the laundering of money. The writer will then provide explanations from at least three relevant areas of law that have been...

Words: 2964 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Criminal Liability of Corporation in India

...Criminal Liability of Corporation: An Indian Perspective Manjeet Kumar Sahu* Abstract Current Supreme Court’s decision have made the stand apparently clear in India that the Corporation can be prosecuted as a separate legal entity even in the offences where the punishment is imprisonment. This Paper explains the present status of India on Corporate Criminal Liability and how judicial decision is inconsistent with the legal provisions. It further provides the current situation about the corporate criminal liability in the International scenario. The apex court’s decision under various matters reflects the gravity of the concerned problem i.e being faced by the aggrieved parties. The Concept of “No soul to kick” has become obsolete and applicability of lifting the corporate veil has unveiled the sheath. The current research on this subject have been included and it is substantiated with the effect of recent Supreme Court’s judgement and also focused on the dilemmatic situation of the Court’s decision. Keywords: Corporation, Criminal Liability, Judicial Decision, Legal provision, International Scenario, Dilemmatic Situation. Introduction A company can only act through human beings and a human being who commits an offence on account of or for the benefit of a company will be responsible for that offence himself. The importance of incorporation is that it makes the company itself liable in certain circumstances, as well as the human beings. ---------Glanville Williams The...

Words: 7426 - Pages: 30

Premium Essay

Computer Crimes

...of criminal crime, including (1) the computer as an instrument of crime, (2) the computer as a target, (3) the computer as incidental to crime, and (4) crimes associated with the prevalence of computers. (Taylor, & Fritsch, 2011) The first category, the computer as an instrument of crime is basically using the computer to facilitate the crime. The criminal introduces a program to manipulate the computer's analytical processes, thereby facilitating the crime. The computer is used to connect to networks so the criminal can do such crimes as fraud, theft of service, theft, threats and even harassment. Another method involves converting legitimate computer processes for illegitimate purposes. Crimes in this category include fraudulent use of automated teller machine (ATM) cards and accounts; theft of money from accrual, conversion, or transfer accounts; credit card fraud; fraud from computer transactions (stock transfers, sales, or billings); and telecommunications fraud. Crimes in which the computer is the target include such offenses as theft of intellectual property, theft of marketing information (e.g., customer lists, pricing data, or marketing plans), or blackmail based on information gained from computerized files (e.g., medical information, personal history, or sexual preference). These crimes also could entail sabotage of intellectual property, marketing, pricing, or personnel data or sabotage of operating systems and programs with the intent to impede a business or...

Words: 803 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Final Exam

...office. The father and the company:: have a conflict of interest. 24. Corruption in international business operations:: undermines investment. Due process rights are: found in the fifth and fourteenth amendments. Due process rights are part of the:: Fifth Amendment. Expropriation is not: the act of state doctrine. Expropriation:: is the taking of private property by a government. Federal district courts have subject matter jurisdiction:: over criminal cases involving federal statutes. Foreign businesses conducting business within the United States:: are subject to both its civil and criminal laws. Gaining access to federal databases is a violation of the:: Federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. GATT is an example: of a multilateral treaty. GATT stands for the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, and is: an agreement among 100 countries to increase trade by reducing tariffs. 2. 25. 3. 26. 27. 28. 4. 5. 6. 7. A consent decree is comparable to: a nolo contendere plea A consent decree:: is the same as a plea of nolo contendere. A default in a lawsuit is like: a forfeit in sports. A federal district court has subject matter jurisdiction over cases in which: the United States is a party. A juror can be eliminated from a jury panel:: because one of the attorneys feels uncomfortable about the juror or his attitude. 29. 30. 31. 8. 32. 33. 9. A law that requires a review of the work of an agency and its effectiveness before the agency will be permitted...

Words: 2752 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Cj Intro

...Criminal Justice Today CHAPTER 4 BOOK COVER Criminal Law Criminal Justice Today, 13th Edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, © 2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Nature of Law • Rules of conduct inherent in human nature and in the natural order • Knowable through intuition, inspiration, and the exercise of reason, without need for reference to created laws  Ten Commandments  The U.S. Declaration of Independence Criminal Justice Today, 13th edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, ©2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved English Common Law • Originates from usage and custom rather than from written statutes • The major source of modern criminal law in the United States • Judge-made law that is refined and changed by actual decisions that judges make when ruling on cases before them Criminal Justice Today, 13th edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, ©2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Definition of the Rule of Law • The maxim that an orderly society must be governed by established principles and known codes that are applied uniformly and fairly to all of its members Criminal Justice Today, 13th edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, ©2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved The Categories of Law • Statutory law  Substantive criminal law • Describes what constitutes particular crimes and specifies the appropriate punishment...

Words: 1129 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Week 1 Posts

...post a 200-300-word response to the following discussion question by clicking on Reply. What is crime? What are the components of the criminal justice system? How does crime relate to the law? What changes would you recommend to better improve the criminal justice process? Crime is any act or omission (i.e. something intentionally or unintentionally left out), which violates established laws of the local, state, or federal governments (Schmalleger, 2011, p. 7). What does this mean? It means that if there is a law governing a particular act and an individual commits the act in violation of the established law, they are committing a crime. For example, if there is a local ordinance (law) banning smoking of any kind of tobacco or tobacco product within 25 feet of a business or government building and you find yourself smoking a cigarette within 10 feet of one of these specified locations (act), you are in violation of the law and in effect committing a crime. The components of the criminal justice system consist of law enforcement, courts and corrections (Schmalleger, 2011, p. 14). In all of the components of the criminal justice system, you will find various agencies, titles, and roles specific to ensuring the administration of justice. These systems of processes are designed to protect the innocent and ensure fairness (due process) of the law is adhered to before, during, and after arrest (Schmalleger, 2011, p. 14). Crime in a sense is an act or omission, which society, via...

Words: 1826 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Resources

...Role and Functions of law When thinking of laws and what they are, one can essentially say that they are rules or regulations that make sense, they are laws that are enforce “common sense”. William O. Douglas, the longest tenured Supreme Court justice once said, “Common sense often makes good laws.” Laws serve certain rolls and functions in every aspect of life, but this paper will discuss these enforced ethics in business and society. According to Google (2014), law is defined as: “the system of rules that a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and may enforce by the imposition of penalties.”  Basically this definition is stating that the law is the rules and regulations that aid in governing conduct, handling disputes, and dealing with criminal actions, in the state and federal aspect of our country. Business and society are such broad subjects that there are many laws that contribute to them, but there are several that encapsulate these laws best. Criminal law deals with acts of premeditated harm to individual or a certain party but in hind sight are acts against us all. A crime can be defined as a deliberate or reckless act that causes harm to another person or another person’s property. Civil law deals with disputes between private parties, such as individuals with companies, land owners, building owners, family cases, etc. In these civil cases, federal and state authorities take no part or play no roles, unless the...

Words: 726 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Case Study

...principles Nature and classification of crime - Crime is conduct that is prohibited and punished by a government - Can be violation of common law or statutory - A misdeameanor is punishable by a fine or less than a year in prison ( any theft is a misdeamenor ) - A felony is a crime that is punishable by imprisonment or death Bassis of criminal liability - A mental state is the defendant does not have to know that the act is criminal; it is sufficient that the act was done voluntarily . - Act of omission – an act or omission of a required act must actually take place - Harm may occur but ir is not a required element for an act to be classified as a crime Responsibility for criminal acts - Corporate liability - Officers and agents of corporations may be held responsible for the criminal acts of their employees. Liability may attach when employees fail to act. U.S. v Erickson convictions were upheld; defendents intentionally backdated documents. - penalty for crime: forfeiture is a penalty for a crime - penalties for business and white collar crimes Courts now apply percentage of revenues when calculating corporate fines and penalties Mandatory prison sentences for officers. US senstencing commission. - Sarbances oxley basically was criminal fraud and white collar crime Substantically increases penalties for corporate crimes Mail and wire fraud penaties Indemnification of...

Words: 301 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Law Reflection

...Substantive Law Substantive Law is the area of law that defines the rights and responsibilities of individuals within a society. The substantive law also defines what is considered a crime and if someone were to break the law then the substantive law would describe the proper punishments to be enforced for breaking that law and provide some boundaries that can help a jury with sentencing. Substantive law is very common and is the type of laws that one would hear about on the evening news. For example the law of committing murder, there are many variations of the types of homicide. Justifiable homicide is defined as non-criminal homicide. It is possible that if homicide is committed   to stop a rape, or other serious crimes, it could be justified. The Substantive law describes what may determine justifiable homicide as well as what the rights are for that person who may be facing charges.  Procedural Law Procedural law is the process of the legal system. For example, procedural law provides the guidelines that must be followed to submit a lawsuit, press charges, and how restitution and penalties must be handled. Procedural law is also referenced as the "due process of law" and describes how to navigate through the legal system (Procedural Law, 2012). Procedural law is closely aligned with substantive law in defining the process for identifying that a law has been broken, how to pursue bringing forth an allegation, and how infractions of the law are handled. Criminal Law ...

Words: 975 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Finance Essay

...not be given to people with heavy criminal records General Statement: The rate at which the criminal acts being perpetrated in the World today is unacceptable. Most criminals have found it very easy to go about continuing to commit such criminal act because they know that regardless of their records, they are still going to get what a non-criminal gets; financial aid. Financial aid should not be given to people with heavy criminal records due to wastage of resources, trust issue and difficulty to advance or grow. Topic Sentence 1 * Wastage of Resources * Lack of dedication and involvement after the rendering of such financial aid * They tend to spend it on drugs or other criminal activities which they enjoy or find interesting * Trust Issues * It is difficult to trust a criminal or an ex-criminal after all once a criminal forever likely to be a criminal * Fears of people with heavy criminal records disappearing or disappointing after being given such aid or aids * Difficult to Advance or Grow * Study Loan or Aid (they tend not to focus on their studies and are distracted based on their criminality) * Business Loan or Aid (their criminal record gives them a bad image outside which in turn affects their business, stales or stops their growth) Conclusion Although we cannot dispute the fact that some people with criminal records actually find a way to fight out of it and became law abiding citizen but it is obvious...

Words: 294 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Burden of Proof

...Answer Answer Quite simply, criminal law deals with violations of statutory crime and its punishment, civil law deals with non-criminal things such as contracts/business, and things such as divorce, etc. You can be charged under both criminal and civil proceedings though. A perfect example is OJ Simpson being aquitted of criminal charges but being found guilty in civil proceedings. Probably the biggest difference between the two is what is called "BURDEN OF PROOF" In criminal proceedings the burden is "BEYOND ALL REASONABLE DOUBT" for someone to be convicted. This means that the evidence points substantially towards guilt and there is little to no question of guilt. For a jury in this case you would need everyone in agreement or the case is a mistrial. Unaminity is the key. In civil proceedings all that is required is "preponderance of evidence" which means that if it is found that it was more likely than not that an incident occured then you can be convicted. This kind of proceeding is really a "who has the best evidence" type of case. Only a majority of jury members decision is needed in this case. ANSWER 2 1. Criminal Law cases must prove the person's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, whilst civil cases must be proved on the balance of probability 2. The main difference however is who the law is aimed at. Theoretically criminal law is a considered to be harming all members of society. Consequently, the victim of the criminal case is all of society; hence...

Words: 520 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Controlling Organized Crime

...Crime CJA/ Criminal Procedure As we all know crime is part of society and every day life of a person. It would be very difficult to believe that a society or country could completely get rid of crime by itself. We know that crime is based of the actions and activities of many different people or groups of people depending on what they are trying to accomplish. Some people see their actions as good and beneficial and some see them as bad and have a negative effect after completed. There are many people in society who commit crimes who do not see their actions as being negative actions. Some of them believe that what they are going is justifiable due to their morals and how they were raised. We all know that these activities are not deemed as acceptable activities in any type of society. Yes, we all know that when a criminal is tried for their crimes that they are being brought up on charges that we as the people and the criminal justice system have deemed as illegal and not acceptable to do. Crimes normally start or generate when a corruption or rule breaker is identified within our law enforcement or political parties or even our justice people. This is one example of where the problems and crimes are generated and it all escalates from there. Over time we have all learned about organized crime and the constant challenge and obstacles that they create as well as constantly challenging our federal and state law officials....

Words: 1031 - Pages: 5