Free Essay

Calvinism

In:

Submitted By samthegenius
Words 6086
Pages 25
The Doctrine of Calvinism

Name
Course
Professor
Date

Introduction Many people do not have a slight idea of what we mean by Calvinism. It is not a surprise because they know nothing about the doctrine. My effort is to try and help people understand the doctrine of Calvinism. I will try to explain what it is and the historical information behind it. It has a pretty wide doctrine that I will have the chance of defining it all through the paper. I think that it will be easy to highlight the scriptural basis linked to Calvinism. I will be glad to point out show the linkage present between Calvinism and scriptures in the Bible. There are different belief systems within Christianity of which Calvinism is one of them. Calvinism was taught by John Calvin, and it strictly pays attention to a very high view of scripture and tends to derive its theological formulations majorly on the word of God.
In the course, I will be pointing out the theological development of Calvinism. How has the theology developed from the past? How did it come to be? Has it be accepted by the Christians or not? However, at the end of my work, I will be glad to show reasons that Calvinism has been criticized. Therefore, I will be able to indicate the criticism of the doctrine and the reason why some people oppose this doctrine. Different people have divergent views about Calvinism hence; the objections are present and will be highlighted.
What people wonder is whether Calvinism is biblical or not. Many Christians have doubts and many questions in their mind about Calvinism. However, others believe and accept the doctrine of Calvinism and are satisfied with it. Therefore, there are those Christians who oppose the doctrine, as well as those who are satisfied with it. No one has to be restricted to have his or her different view of Calvinism because, in Christianity, you cannot force an individual to believe something when he or she is not at peace with its information. Therefore, my plan is to give a good and satisfactory explanation of this doctrine and hope to answer questions for those that question the doctrine.
Historical background of Calvinism
Calvinism is also known as the Reformed tradition or the Reformed faith. It is ideally a significant branch of Western Christianity that systematically follows the culture, tradition and other forms of Christian practice of John Calvin and other theologians. Calvinists differed with the Lutherans on the real presence of Christ in the Lord’s Supper, the theories of worship, as well as the use of God’s law for believers and followers among other things. Therefore, the Calvinists broke with the Roman Catholic Church .
Calvinism originated with the reformation taking place in Switzerland; wherethe theologian, Huldrych Zwingli, started preaching in Zurich way back in the year 1519. There then became a conflict over the genuine and real presence of Christ in the Eucharist between Martin Luther and Huldrych thus, it led to the division between the Protestants that followed Luther and Zwingli. It was at this point that great theologians like John Calvin succeeded Zwingli. Such theologians were very influential in the development and spread of Reformed theology.
John Calvin came to be known after the death of Zwingli. The first generation theologians included the likes of Huldrych Zwingli and John Oecolampadius. These theologians had an opposition to the bodily presence of Christ particularly in the Lord’s Supper. They firmly believed that salvation only by grace alone and hence, they comfortably identified a similar doctrine of particular election where they argued that some individuals are ordained by God for salvation.
On the other hand, the likes of John Calvin and Wolfgang Musculus are those who belong to the second generation theologians. Due to Calvin’s successful missionary work, there was the upholding of Calvinism in the Electoral Palatinate. What followed was the spread of Calvinism in many countries including Scotland and England and finally the rest of the world.
This shows that even before John Calvin, Calvinism concepts prove to have existed and was present way long before he was born. Therefore, the early reformers had started the reformation and had already begun it as they continuously taught many similar doctrines to those of John Calvin. There are concepts of Neo-Calvinism, as well as New Calvinism. A version of Calvinism has been adopted by the theological conservatives and liberals in the Dutch Reformed Churches . New Calvinism has become influential in the present generation in many evangelical circles. It has continuously blended Calvinism soteriology and has had many Charismatic views and understandings of the spiritual gifts.
Calvinism in the new world
In today’s generation, the spirit of Calvinism is making itself known to all of Christianity, and it has continuously characterized by a firm combination of God-consciousness with a quick sense of mission. It is not primarily a rich man’s religion, but its most faithful believers, historically, have been among the less successful. Capitalists who reflect Calvinistic ethics are majorly concerned not with plenty of wealth, but with using it as a beneficiary of others. The spirit can no longer be identified by only reformed churches; it has also gone beyond ecclesiastical bounds seeking for union and intercommunion. Calvin’s message is to all individuals. And that message points out that in every circumstance; every man has to do with God.
The power of the biblical doctrines that the theologist John Calvin taught and spread impact our world today. Some people quiver when they take a deep thought of returning Calvinism. These people believe that they would at some point stay at a place of intellectual neutrality and objectivity than to have commitments to the mission that Calvinism demands. However, the spirit of Calvinism in the present era is not that easy to define. Therefore, Calvinism in the generation today has brought about many doubts and questions among different people as well as churches worldwide. Christians may not know what Calvinism I all about because the spread of Calvinism has not been common to them.
The five points of Calvinism
These well-known five points were not selected by Calvinists but, they emerged to be a response to the Arminians who objected them. The doctrine of Calvinism can be clearly understood using some five key points that arise from it. According to Calvinism, salvation is achieved by the divine power of the Supreme God. Here, we get that the process that includes election, salvation, as well as regeneration is the total work of the Father, God, and it is by grace alone. Therefore, God chose a people; the Son died for these people He chose, and the Holy Spirit, on the other hand, makes the death of Christ fully complete. The Holy Spirit makes Christ’s death effective by bringing the elect to faith and repentance hence, they are able obey the Gospel without any objection .
The doctrine of salvation contained in the Holy Scriptures came up after the reaffirmation of the theology system. Therefore, the system was put together into five points in an attempt to have answers to the unscriptural five significant points that were offered by the Arminians to the Church of Holland way back in the year 1610. The acrostic TULIP helps us easily recognize and understand the five points of Calvinism. T stands for Total Depravity or Inability, U for Unconditional Election, L for Limited Atonement. I and P stand for Irresistible Grace and Perseverance of the Saints respectively. I will thereby, evaluate these five points and see what they state to us even if they represent the main points of Calvinism.
Calvinism pays attention to God’s sovereignty, teaching us that God is able and willing by the dignity of his omniscience and omnipotence nature, to freely do what He wants with that which He has created. It also tells us about the teachings of the Bible. Arminianism maintains that God predetermined, but not in an unconditional sense. It also tells us that Jesus Christ died for the sins of all individuals who have ever lived and will come to live in the future, not just for Christians. Arminianism suggests that one has the potential of losing his or her salvation and also salvation is an individual’s choice. Hence, one can decide to get saved or not get saved at all depending on what he or she wants.

Total Depravity

It is also commonly known as Original Sin. Sin has indeed been evident in all men. Sin affects us all even in our bodies as well as our emotions. It is true to say that we are sinful humans. Hence, it is evident we are all sinners. Total Inability is acquired from Scriptures of the Bible that clearly indicate the character of humans. Calvinists have no answer to how it is possible for someone to choose or long for God since the scriptures tell them that man does not have that capability. Moreover, we are not saved because of our will at all but instead, by God’s will. According to Total Depravity, God is the Fatherthat appoints people to believe and, therefore, faith is, nothing but the work of God. Hence, God predetermines, and we are only believers who are chosen by God to have faith in what He says in the Bible.
Today, by saying Original Sin, what we mean is the level of ungodliness man has in nature. Therefore, by the fall of man intosin, he lost the ability of will to any of the spiritual good and was hence, not able to realize himself. The whole Bible, from the first book to the last one, provides the proof that we need about the origin of sin and the ungodliness that led to the fall of man.
Moreover, Total Depravity is at some point the most unaccepted and misunderstood point of Calvinism. Calvinism makes an extensive statement concerning Total Depravity rather than making a more radical statement with regard to it. Calvin suggests that indeed, man is unsaved because he is a slave of his sins. Calvin points out that without the power of the Holy Spirit, the natural man is not capable of seeing and hearing the messages that are present in the Gospel. Therefore, this makes Total Depravity be termed as Total Inability because, without the knowledge of God, man can never realize his capability. Probably this is because without God makes him alive through Jesus Christ.
What I can say is that Calvinism shows us that as a result of man’s sinful deeds, every individual is enslaved to sin because he fell into sin. Moreover, Calvin meant that total depravity indicates the inability to save oneself but rather, being absent of goodness. Therefore, Calvinists believe that the entire human race has been affected by the fall of Adam into sin, and the human race is not able to save itself from sin.
Unconditional Election
Since man has falleninto sin and is not able to respond to God’s call, certain people have been elected by God so as to be saved. This is because man does not have the ability to elect people to salvation and is even not willing to do so. Therefore, God chooses the elect according to His will and kind intention to His creation. Moreover, it tells us that the elected are not chosen out of any merits from God. God takes no consideration when selecting them but, does it according to His will. Therefore, this means that anyone can be chosen by God to bring salvation despite any ill thoughts about the individual. God looked at nothing but, He unconditionally chooses them because of His love and mercy on His creation.
Hence, salvation is brought to them only through acceptance of Jesus Christ. The doctrine, however, does not contradict the responsibility of man to accept and believe the mighty works of God the Son . The doctrine attempts to tell us that even if man and God fell apart after the fall of man into sin, God’s saving grace is a revelation of His merciful deeds. It is a clear indication of God’s good works of bringing up good people full of grace .

Limited Atonement
When it comes to limited atonement, Calvinism tries to find the solutions to the question that arises regarding those individuals Christ died for. Christ may have died for many but, he did not do it for all. Specifically, He died for Christians who are today said to be the unseen church. According to the Bible, God sent Christ to die and save those that He wanted to be saved.
This makes the ideology to face numerous objections mostly from those that think that Limited Atonement brings controversies to evangelists. Christ, therefore, died to wash away sins for certain sinners selected by God, and make them holy. Not all men are saved. Thus, this indicates that He did not die for all but only for a chosen few. In this doctrine, evangelism is brought up in it just because the evangelist tell their follower or believers that Christ died for sinners, and, as a result, those whom he died for will not be lost by Him.
Because of God’s own election, He selected those that are fit to be saved and affirmed that Christ is supposed to die for those He has elected only. The elected will thereby be all saved by Christ through shedding of his blood and death. Calvinists figure out that the blood that was shed by Jesus Christ was enough for Him to save all humans. Calvinists are determined that Christ did not shed His blood without a purpose.
Irresistible Grace
The doctrine points out that those elected by God are attached to Him through irresistible grace. Man is free to go to God and accept Him if he is willing to do so. Man is supposed to respond to God’s call when He elects him. This makes irresistible grace also to be known as efficacious grace. Obeying God’s call of the gospel builds their faith of His saving mission. This implies that when God intends to save someone, nothing can stop Him, and the individual will certainly be saved by Him.
With the help of the Holy Spirit, an elected sinner cleanses his or her sins, cooperates with what God wants and finally repents to accept Christ willingly. They are, therefore, able to overcome resistance and obey the call of the gospel. It is an inward calling that cannot be rejected, unlike some outward callings that are often rejected. Irresistible grace is at some point compatible with witnessing and preaching that tries to tell people to do things that are reasonable.
Not being in the position of repenting and accepting God implies that one is resisting the Holy Spirit. Therefore, irresistible grace simply is God’s sovereign work so as to fight the resistance of our heart and will enable us to have faith in Christ so that we can all be saved. If we are enslaved to sin, unable to give ourselves to God, believing in Christ will be a problem unless we overcome our rebellion through God.
Perseverance of the Saints
Those God has elected and saved are safe and secure because they cannot lose their salvation after being selected by God. They are forever secure. Not a soul that God has elected and saved will be lost because they have been drawn to Him through the power of the Holy Spirit. Therefore, perseverance of the saints is a doctrine that the saints who are obviously those saved by God will remain under God’s protection and will be glorified in heaven. The Calvinist accept the Word of God and firmly believe in Christ's promise that He will truly fulfill the will God the Father in saving all those He tends to be His elect.
In summary of this, what I can say is that Calvinism has tried to show Biblical scriptures in support to what they are trying to teach us. The doctrine has tried to express its views and respond to what Arminians objected. Moreover, it at some point contradicts what the Church teaches us today.
Theological Development of the Calvinism Doctrine In the 16th century as discussed above, a well-known Protestant rose and become the man behind the Christian doctrine of Calvinism. John Calvin was his name, and it is clear that this movement got its name from the initiator. Calvin like any other leader was in the front line to ensure that his mission was not just a success but also a long lasting success that would be appreciated by generations that would follow. The term is more of a doctrine and practices that went through various levels of theological development . The primary aim of this practice was to reform the church. This section of my paper will look into details of how the Calvinism doctrine developed over time from a theological angle. Calvinism did take a different geographical route when it came to its development. The reason Calvinism had to get a different route is that Lutheranism had been largely confined in large parts of Germany and Scandinavia nations that include Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Calvinism began to find root in large parts of England, France, Netherlands and Scotland. It is good to note that Calvinism spread its roots in the English-speaking colonies in the northern part of America, some parts of Germany where Lutheranism had not taken roots and also in some parts of Central Europe. Calvinism expansion across the globe took part during Calvin’s lifetime. The movement initially was thought to be political, but later the ideas and motives behind this movement became clear. The theological development of Calvinism doctrine begun when refugees, especially from France, flooded into Geneva .
Millions of people were moving out of France during the mid 16th century after the government became increasingly intolerant. When these slaves poured into the city, Calvin welcomed them with open hands and trained them as ministers of the Word and the doctrine of Calvinism found its first step in theological development. Calvinism sent the trained minister to their motherlands where they were to go and spread the gospel. The sending of highly trained ministers was a landmark in the theological development of this doctrine. When Jesus left for heaven, he sent the Holy Spirit to help the apostles. The case is similar when Calvin sent these ministers, he supported with letters of encouragement and pieces of advice. From then up to date Geneva became an international centre for a global movement and also the model for churches. One of the Calvinists leader from Scotland describes this step in the theological development of Calvinism as a perfect school o Christ that was ever seen on earth after that of the apostles. The theological development of Calvinism in Geneva was a forecast of the fate that waited for other Calvinist ministers out there. Another landmark in the development process came in the year 1619 when Calvinists reached a climax in Netherlands at Synod of Dort. The Synod of Dort was a spell of various corollaries of predestination something that Calvin never did before. Despite provoking that the synod went through, it was still attended by some representatives of the Reformed churches. There was a group of theologians who were not satisfied with the theological development of Calvinism especially Calvin’s rhetorical writing that was loose. They went into details of appealing to the medieval Scholastic authorities. Calvinism theological development made another milestone when they had their major theological statement of the 17th century. It was the Institutio Theologiae Elencticae (1688; Institutes of Elenctic Theology) of François Turretin, who was the chief pastor in Geneva. This statement was a recall of Calvin’s work that resembled the Institutes of Christian Religion, which was never published in vernacular languages. The dialectical structure of this masterpiece did follow a model that was initially patented to Summae of Thomas Aquinas. What it suggested was the confidence that Thomas had in the value of human reasoning. This shift had a long lasting significance that was postulated Turretin’s work in a basic textbook of theology at the Princeton Theological Seminary, which is based in New Jersey. Princeton Theological Seminary was the most elite and intellectual center of American Calvinism whose dominance lasted until the middle of 19th century. As expected there some historians who studied this theological development and there have been some debates on where the theological development of Calvinism. The primary argument that is put across is whether these developments were essentially faithful to the beliefs of Calvin it is good to note that in some sense the beliefs were true. There were some points in the theological development when these beliefs abandoned Calvin’s humanism. These changes suggest of routinization . Routinization, as it was put across by Max Weber, is usually a stage of development that comes after a movement has had a creative beginning. All this changes in the theological development of Calvinism occurred during a period of singular disorder that was caused by a chronological religious warfare that produced the certainty of peace and security across the world.
Scriptural basis of the Calvinism doctrine There is a question that has always come up when the scriptural basis of Calvinism is traced. The question is, is Calvinism Biblical? What does the Bible say about this doctrine? This section of my document is going to look into details of what the Christian biblical scripture says about the doctrine of Calvinism. For decades and centuries, the doctrine of Calvinism has been one of the most questioned, talked about and discussed practices across global religions. Christians both amateurs and professional have divided themselves into two groups that are the Calvinists and the Arminians.
There is another group that has not been given much attention by scholars, and the group is the one that has accepted neither the extreme views or rejected the tenets that are put across but both positions. The primary scope of this section of my paper will be to look into details of revealing who was this man, John Calvin and were is teaching in the movements as per the scripture. I am not going to judge, but I am just going to try and see what kind of teachings did were they. There are those people who believe in the bible and are keen followers of the word of God, and the truth of the word is what is going to be used in determining the truth of this doctrine. For one to understand the scripture basis of this doctrine it is important to talk about the five points that formed the basis for Calvinism doctrine.
All those who believe in Christ and the holy trinity of God, the Father, Jesus, the Son, and the Holy Spirit love God. Unless they go wrong what they do is supposed to bring them close to God. For us to know whether the actions and practices of Calvinism are Godly or not there is the need of looking at the five key points related to the doctrine.
The first points that will be analyzed for the scriptural basis of the paper are total depravity that talks about the origin of sin. Sin is something that has affected everyone, and it will not only involve our heart, mind, soul emotions and body but will also affect them. Calvinism point of total depravity can be quoted from the book of Mark 7:21 to 23. The book of Mark in this chapter talks about how a man’s heart was created to be evil. The book of Jeremiah 17:9 talks about how man’s heart is sick while the book of Roman 6:20 talks about how the man was made a slave of sin. The book of Romans goes into details if showing how the man does not care about seeking God and inRoman3: 10 to 12 the Bible talks about the failure of man in seeking God. 1st Corinthians 2: 14 talks about how a man does not even care or he does not understand the spiritual things.
The total depravity of Calvinism doctrine has also been quoted several times in a book of Ephesians 2: 15 which talks about a man and the enmity he has with God . According to Calvin, a man is not capable of declaring his true nature since he has no desire and according to him, God must predestine. By origin of sin, Calvinism doctrine teaches about the evil quality that has characterized a man’s natural will and also deposition. This will and deposition are what Calvinism practices called the sin of nature since a man is born a sinner. According to the Bible, if we (men) say that we have not sinned, we are deceiving ourselves, and the truth of Christ is not in us.
God chooses whom he is pleased with according to the teaching of Calvinism. He does not choose on the basis of any merit that is shown or was once shown by the object of his grace. His election is not based on whether that person would accept the offer of the gospel or not. He chooses the one he wants and when he want to do what he wants for him. The act of election is something that God has done even before he could bring human beings into the earth. The book of Proverb 23:26 say, “My sons give me thy heart.” The words of Solomon are wise and this one it is the voice of God asking for man’s heart. God require truth, and there is no way through which man can deceive God. God had only one son. When he sent his son to die for the crown he died for all for that anyone who will believe in him shall have eternal life, this is according to the book of John 3:16. There other scriptures that quote God unlimited election. The scriptures include Matthew 26:28 and Ephesians 5:25-27.
The third talking point about Calvinism is the limited atonement. According to Calvinism teaching Jesus did not die for everyone, Jesus died for the elect few. The book of John 10:11 to 15 say that Jesus died for the sheep. The concept that is applied to this doctrine is that Jesus died for many souls, not all souls. There are those souls that do not believe in Jesus. Going back to the Bible in the book of Acts 20:28 and Eph 5:25- 27 states that Jesus in his prayers will intercede for those who are given to him. The prayers there are not in point of time that the prayers will be for the whole world.
It is one of the paramount talking points that are put across by Calvinism theory. The doctrine argues that if God through His Son Jesus Christ calls you into his kingdom, power or salvation you have no option or power to resist. He is a mighty God, who is always there for us and his powers, are second to none. Calvinism views God as the kings of kings, and his superiority cannot be compared to anybody. One good thing to note about God is that he will always, as he has always offered the gospel messages to all people despite their location. It is up to people to decide whether to accept the gospel or not. The calling by the Holy Spirit to a person will completely transform that person since it will work on the minds, heart and the souls of the elect . The elect apart from this will be poured and showered with forgiveness if they will repent and regeneration if they come to God. The Bible in the book of Romans 9:16 just give an affirmation to this doctrine by Calvinism practices. The Bible promises and says that it is not of him who wills or of him who runs, it can also be both, but is of the mercy that God will show to them. Acts 13:18 talks about where God will appoint people to believe.
The last point that comes with the doctrine of Calvinism is the perseverance of saints. Once you acquire your salvation, you cannot lose it because it the father who elected you and his son Jesus Christ have redeemed you. The Holy Spirit applies the salvation and helps you to sail through the Christian life. What the Bible teaches is that Christianity is an eternity, and the teachings have made people believe that there is life after death which is an everlasting life. John 10:27, Jesus said that his sheep. In this case, he was referring to the Christians who have believed in him will never perish and no matter what they go through they, will always come out as victors. There will be some temptations that will come along, but it is nothing to worry about since they will never out do as since he who lives in us, Christ, is greater than them. God will be faithful his word, and whatever comes along the way he will stand by us without any problem or issue. He promises us he won’t tempt his saints with temptations that they cannot handle in the book of Philippians 1:6 and 1st Corinthians 10:13 After a critical analysis of the five talking point of Calvinism, it is irrefutable to say that Calvinism doctrine has found its roots in what it needs to have a scriptural basis. Every point has found several biblical quotations that make the doctrine unquestionably on the issue of biblical basis. The Bible can be used as a defending force for Calvinism practices. There were some points when Calvin was teaching the doctrine of Calvinism when he went against the scripture. They are personal views, and they do not fully show the talking points of Calvinism doctrine.
Criticism and Objection to the Doctrine
Nothing has ever been fully appreciated in the society, and so Calvinism is not different in any way. There are some people who have come up with objections and criticism towards this doctrine and this section of my paper is going to cover the objections that Calvinism faced in the past and the current society. The primary reason Calvinism has be objected in the society is due to its argument. The primary argument that has been objected is the view that God did not send his son to die for everyone.
According to Calvinism God, did not send his son for all he sent his son, Jesus Christ to die for the sins of the chosen few whom they are called the elect. This is been counter-attacked with the word of God from the book of 1 John 2:2. Jesus clearly says that himself is a propitiation for the human beings sins, not for us who believe but for the whole world. Jesus died for the whole world, not part of as Calvinism has been arguing. According to the practices of Calvinism, the elect are the only one who can receive the gift if the forgiveness that came after Jesus died on the cross. It is not the case, the grace of God is available freely for anyone who will believe in him thus it is not only the elect. When Jesus died on the cross, his blood was meant for the whole world, his graces are sufficient for all of us, which has been quoted on several occasion by the Bible . The criticism and objections for Calvinism do not stop there; criticism digs deep into doubting what Calvinism says that we believe according to our very own respective natures. Calvinism says that we were all born sinners, and there is no one who can oppose this since it is in the bible. Sinning is part of human living. Calvinists do say that we believe according to what respective natures we have, and there is no one who will doubt that. The word of God is clear, if people say that they have not sinned, they shall be deceiving themselves. Calvinism doctrine has come up with a word that is close to this; depravity is the name. According to the teachings of Calvinism practices, a man is usually depraved, and he has been marked by corruption or evil. Calvinism goes to with their teachings and says that since a man is depraved, he cannot choose God, and the reason that they put here is that God is the ultimate of goodness. Calvinism says that a man’s nature will only bring him closer to evil but not goodness that can be found in God. They say that a man has been enslaved to evils and sin, and this will only increase the gap between God and man. Yes, man has a sinful nature but God is in control he can change that man if he wants. Before that person can repent God already knows it, and he is prepared for it and in this case Calvinism has no option rather than accept this objection.
People have questioned the teachings of this doctrine. It has been objected and criticized for its stand about the gospel and the salvation that Jesus brought in that it is not good news. The Bible in the first four book of New Testament talks about the gospel which Jesus Christ as good news. Calvinism doctrine has been objected as not being good news. The good news of God is that he sent Jesus Christ to die for all people contrary to what Calvinism says about the death of Christ. The death of Christ was mean to bring healing, salvation reconciliation of man with God among many other purposes. Calvinism does not talk about the good news of salvation to all. One thing that Calvinism doctrine and practitioners should understand is that when God is working in the life of a person and salvation, he does not save anyone so that they can believe, but he will save anyone who has believed in him.
Conclusion
Calvinism is a Christian doctrine that has found millions of followers since it was first put across by Calvin John. The doctrine has since then been in practice, and it has changed the lives of many people who have followed its teachings. The paramount focus of the Calvinism doctrine and teachings was to ensure there was a total transformation of the church. Calvinism has five talking point that are the first point among the five points is Total depravity that has taken root in finding the origin of sin. The other point which constitutes the doctrine it talks about the unconditional election and, in this case, the kind of elections is God’s election. The third talking point about Calvinism is the limited atonement that talks about a particular redemption. Irresistible grace by God makes the fourth point. Finally the fifth and the last talking pint of the doctrine is the perseverance of saints. There are some people who have come up with objections and criticism towards this doctrine. There are those who feel that the doctrine is doing it in the current way. What I can say about this doctrine is that it has managed to transform and help millions of people to understand Christianity, but I would not make a decision for anyone on what to do with this doctrine. Bibliography
Burek, Josh. 2010. "Christian faith: five points of New Calvinism." The Christian Science Monitor, 2010. General OneFile, EBSCOhost (accessed June 29, 2015).
Höpfl, Harro, and Gijsbert van den Brink. Calvinism and the Making of the European Mind. Leiden: BRILL, 2014. Discovery eBooks, EBSCOhost (accessed June 28, 2015).
Matheson, Peter. 2009. "John Calvin in Godzone." Stimulus: The New Zealand Journal Of Christian Thought & Practice 17, no. 2: 5-9. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed June 29, 2015).
Muller, Richard A. 2011. "The 'Reception of Calvin' in Later Reformed eology: Concluding oughts." Church History & Religious Culture 91, no. 1/2: 255-274. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed June 29, 2015).
Neuhaus, Richard John. "Five-point Calvinism, as many readers will know, refers to TULIP." First Things: A Monthly Journal Of Religion And Public Life no. 180 (2008): 61. Academic OneFile, EBSCOhost (accessed June 28, 2015).
Ross Macdonald, James. 2014. "Calvinist Theology and "Country Divinity" in Marlowe's Doctor Faustus." Studies In Philology 111, no. 4: 821-844. Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed June 28, 2015).

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Calvinism vs Arminianism

...Introduction Christianity has been a subject of much debate and controversy for many years. There have been many theologians who have studied Christianity and created doctrine of their own interpretation of Scripture. The doctrines that have caused much debate and have been argued for centuries would be Calvinism and Arminianism. There has been opposing views by churches and other theologians that has caused much controversy over these two doctrines. Calvinism is based on the theological beliefs and teachings by John Calvin and Arminianism is based on the views of Jacobus Arminius. Arminius was once a strict Calvinist who studied under John Calvin and later studies led him to doubt and reject many of the Calvinistic doctrines. To label oneself as either a Calvinist or Arminianist would need to fully understand each of their doctrines. PART ONE Calvinism ”The theological system of John Calvin and his followers marked by strong emphasis on the sovereignty of God, the depravity of humankind, and the doctrine of predestination.” -Merriam-Webster Dictionary John Calvin was a great reformation theologian who lived from 1509-1564. “The system of Calvinism adheres to a very high view of scripture and seeks to derive its theological formulations based solely on God’s word. It focuses on God’s sovereignty, stating that God is able and willing by virtue of his omniscience, omnipresence, and omnipotence, to do whatever He desires with His creation. It also maintains that within the...

Words: 2421 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Calvinism and Arminianism

...Calvinism and Arminianism Abel Bermea, Jr. Liberty University ENG /101 August 29, 2006 The purpose of this paper is to compare two theological positions, namely Calvinism and Arminianism. These are two positions on either side of the debate concerning free will and predestination. There are those who believe that we have the free will to love/obey God or hate/deny him, and there are those who believe that God, in his sovereignty, has predetermined who will be saved and who will not be saved and neither group is willing to budge. Both sides claim to have the support of Scripture, and both have specific verses they will undoubtedly point to as an "I told you so." The problem is that both sides appear, on some levels at least, to be right. The question that can be answered from a comparison of these two views is this: Which one of these positions offers the more sensible, biblical account? Let’s look at a simple syllogism that sums up the argument of the Arminian (free will advocate). Premise 1: God desires that all men be saved. Premise 2: All men are not saved. Conclusion: Man, by exercising his will, has interfered with God's desire. Calvinists agree with the first premise, and even the second premise. But they come to a very different conclusion. Here is what the Calvinist argues: Premise 1: God desires that all men be saved. Premise 2: All men are not saved. Conclusion: It is not God's chief desire that all men be saved; he has another desire which is stronger, and...

Words: 1229 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Calvinism vs Arminianism

...Calvinism and Arminianism The purpose of this paper is to compare two theological positions, namely Calvinism and Arminianism. These are two positions on either side of the extreme concerning free will and predestination. There are those who believe that we have the free will to love and obey God or deny God, and there are those who believe that God, in his sovereignty, has predetermined who will be saved or who will not be saved and neither group is willing to budge. Both sides claim to have the support of Scripture, and both have specific verses that are twisted and manipulated to show support and reasoning. The problem is that both sides appear, on some levels at least, to be right. The question that can be answered from a comparison of these two views is this: What are the basic differences between Calvinism and Arminianism, as well as, their relation to theology, biblical evidence and worldviews? This research paper covers the five key points or articles of Calvinism and Arminianism, as well as, the history, view of God and biblical evidence or support for each position. History The history of Calvinism and Arminianism dates back to the 16th century, where a man named John Calvin was born in 1509. John Calvin was a son of a lawyer and born in Noyon, France where he developed a love for theology and literature. In 1523 he went to the University of Paris where he studied theology, yet in 1528 he went to Orleans and a year later Bourges to study law. With Calvin’s...

Words: 2202 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

The Providence Debate:

...THE PROVIDENCE DEBATE: 10/08/2013 201340 FALL 2013 THEO 350-B05 INSTRUCTOR: DR. RICHARD LUMADUE STUDENT: CAROL J MOZEE THE PROVIDENCE DEBATE: 10/08/2013 201340 FALL 2013 THEO 350-B05 INSTRUCTOR: DR. RICHARD LUMADUE STUDENT: CAROL J MOZEE The Providence Debate: Personally why should there be a debate about God, and his where about and how and what he can and can’t do? Who is in control? God is! I know to some people this may not be an appropriate way to start this research paper, but it is what it is and I feel sad that this is how the world thinks and appreciate our God, our Father and Friend. It’s all in defining everything, and not just seeing God’s work and taking, God’s word and believing in God for whom he is. Defining God’s Providence, all things happens according to God’s Sovereign Will, “ God is in control. Romans 8:28 “ And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose”. When one defines God’s providence it is referring to the way God governs the world. Does God really sit on His throne and dictate or rule the world? It is not surprising that there is some disagreement in the evangelical world concerning the control of God, His dealing with salvation especially as affected by Jesus and the freewill of mankind. Some theologians think that the three are in contradictory of each other. Are they really in conflict with each other’s or can all three exist in...

Words: 4203 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

History of Crc

...HISTORY OF CRC I attend a church with the denomination of CRC. The CRC technically came from the Netherlands. But we can’t really be called a Dutch because there are members from all over ethnic areas from Koreans to Hispanics to mosaic. The early church was one in body, one single denomination. But soon views began to change and the church eventually split in two. The Eastern and the Western churches. In 1517 the Protestant Reformation spit the Roman church into several new branches. Among these new branches came the Lutheran church, guided under Martin Luther. Another branch broke off influenced by a different man, this man was Ulrich Zwingli and then later it became John Calvin. This branch was typically referred to as “Presbyterian” or “Reformed”. Reformed churches were very prosperous in the Netherlands and eventually some of these Dutch Reformed people migrated over to the United States, and began the Christian Reformed Church in North America in the year 1857. GREAT HISTORY John Calvin is a very very important person in the Christian Reformed Church’s history. “In a nutshell, these all center on the sovereignty of God. The biblical teachings of predestination and election give us comfort because they assure us that no one and nothing, not even our own bad choices, can snatch us out of God's hand. And the realization that God owns all of creation and continues to assert his rule over it gives us a sure hope for the future.” (crna.org) His teachings spread...

Words: 469 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Max Webers Protestant Ethic & the Spirit of Capatalism

...Max Weber “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism” Max Webers “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism” is an analysis as to the relationship between the emergence of the spirit of capitalism in the west and the ethics of Calvinism. He argues that Calvinism catalysed this creation of the capitalist spirit. His study arose when he asked himself why capitalism had emerged out of Western Europe before anywhere else in the world, even though the economic conditions seemed identical in many of these places. In this essay I will argue that this relationship between the two isn’t as paramount as Weber suggests, and in fact may be completely arbitrary. I believe this for a number of reasons including the distorting effect Webers use of a “ideal type” has and the fact that some areas where Calvinism was practiced heavily Capitalism developed a lot later in, while others with no Calvinist beliefs still did develop Capitalism. Weber starts his analyse looking at the intrinsic relationship between religion and business. He emphasises how sect membership is a sign that you are trustworthy and will be a good business partner, as admission to one of these congregations only happens after a careful probation, where your conduct, back to early childhood, is assessed and checked for any kind of frivolity. Admission therefore is a guarantee of the moral qualities of someone, it is a badge of honour showing you have those qualities that are required in business matters...

Words: 1590 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Reflection Paper

...Theology 104 Reflection Paper J Lynch Liberty University For my two topics I chose Pentecostalism and Calvinism.  While most would write a paper to demolish the foundation on one of these two topics, I will share my life experience with both while providing an equal foundation for each.  Please note that I do believe there is only one correct understanding of God’s Word and character; however the Bible shows evidence that God will use all for his purpose in understanding both faith and Christ’s saving grace. “And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.” (Romans 8:28). Pentecostals mostly lean toward the Arminian perspective, which I believe is consistent with the Pentecostal character. I will list their five points and some supporting verses.  Human Free Will, Power over their own will (1 Corinthians 7:37); Conditional Election, Election is according to God’s foreknowing (1 Peter 1:1-2); Universal Atonement, Any is  welcome to come to Christ (Matthew 11:28-30); Resistible Grace, Not all who hear will believe (Romans10:16); and Fall from Grace, Romans 11:17-24. My childhood was anything but wholesome and I knew great terror until the day God delivered me into a better life. I was born and raised a Romanichal “gypsy,” until I was later adopted at age 15.  In that culture if you are successful, eventually you will end up as a preacher.  Looking back I can see the logic behind...

Words: 975 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

St. Luke Presbyterian Church

...Calvinism is based on scriptures but also relates to man-made beliefs of God. Presbyterians believe that Jesus died on the cross for the salvation of predestined people that God had chosen; which contradicts the Bible. Calvinism is known for the main points of T.U.L.I.P. which is an acronym for Total Wickedness, Unconditional Election, Limited Punishment, Irresistible Grace, and Persistence of the Saints. Total wickedness is the fact that sin affects a person’s whole body, pertaining to the heart, mind, soul, and emotions. Unconditional election is the election of God based on the good intents a person has based on God’s word without attention to the virtue that person has. Limited atonement refers to the Presbyterians belief that Jesus only died for the elected people God had chosen for salvation. Irresistible grace is whoever He chooses to be elected...

Words: 893 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

“Reformed Theology and the Southern Baptist Convention: Historical Precedent or Revisionist Heterodoxy

...7 Sandy Creek Tradition………………………………………………………………………..10 Southern Baptist Convention………………………………………………………………..12 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………...15 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………………...17 Introduction While Arminians have through the years attempted to lay claims of exclusivity that theirs is the primary soteriological doctrine of the Southern Baptist Convention, history demonstrates otherwise and these assertions have a revisionist inflection that is in opposition to the autonomous nature of Southern Baptist congregations. It is not this papers intent to engage in the pros or cons of any given doctrine as it pertains to soteriology, but instead illustrate that what is seen by some as a modern incursion of Calvinism upon the Southern Baptist scene is in fact not without precedent and has a long standing tradition among many of this denominations most ardent practitioners. The Southern Baptist Convention is no stranger to controversy having in its 169 year history been at the center of disputes that have unfortunately at times led to division among its members and guided its course for generations. From the more recent inerrancy debates of the twentieth century to the schism of nineteenth century Landmarkism, Southern Baptists have shown themselves passionate about...

Words: 4266 - Pages: 18

Free Essay

Using Material from Item a and Elsewhere, Assess the Contribution of Religion to Social Change.

...Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the contribution of religion to social change. (18 marks) Weber found that religion could cause social change, such as the Calvinism and capitalism. The Calvinists believed in predestination, so God had already chosen the elect to go to heaven and the individuals who hadn’t, could not do anything to change that. They believed that God was far above and beyond this words and greater than any mortal, that no human could possibly claim to know his will. This left the Calvinists feeling an ‘unprecedented inner loneliness’. When this is combined with the doctrine of predestination, this created a salvation panic amongst the Calvinists. They also believed in asceticism; self-discipline and self-denial. Refraining from a life of luxury. So, instead of spending a lot of money, they put money back into their business. And they believed in the idea of a vocation or calling. Before Calvinism, the idea of a religious vocation (a calling to serve God) meant renouncing everyday life to join a convent or monastery. Weber called this otherworldly asceticism. Calvinists knew God’s plan for humanity, which came from the Bible and it revealed that that they were put on Earth to do glorify God’s name by our work. So, for the Calvinists, this meant constant, methodical work in an occupation and not a monastery. However, work could not earn salvation; this was simply...

Words: 912 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Original Sin: Do All Infants Go to Heaven?

...ORIGINAL SIN: DO ALL INFANTS GO TO HEAVEN? Harold Wayne Yeager, Jr. (ID# 24582631) THEO 525 LUO (fall 2012) Systematic Theology I October 10, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Thesis Statement……..…………………………………………………………………………1 Introduction……...…...…………………………………………………………………………1 A Look Into The Past……...……………………………………………………………………2 Roman Catholic View………..…………………………………………………………………3 Lutheran View…….…………………………………………………………………………….4 Reformed View………………………………………………………………………………….5 Biblical Perspective……...……………………………………………………..……………….8 A Special Application of Atonement...………………………………………………………….9 A Modern Look………………………………………………………………………………..10 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………….10 Thesis Statement It is the intent of this paper to show that children who die in infancy, regardless of the beliefs of their parents, are given salvation and therefore spend eternity in heaven. Original sin is still present, but God, being free and independent of us, freely chooses to save infants who are not capable of making a choice to commit their lives to Christ. Introduction Infant salvation is a complex issue, sometimes controversial and a topic of much debate within Christendom. The issue of infant salvation first arose with the institution of infant baptism, done so that infants who died would be baptized, and thus saved in case of death. Though that debate has subsided in recent years, it is not due to a...

Words: 4172 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

Calvinist vs Anti-Calvinist in Dr.Faustus

...The Calvinist/anti-Calvinist controversy The theological implications of Doctor Faustus have been the subject of considerable debate throughout the last century. Among the most complicated points of contention is whether the play supports or challenges the Calvinist doctrine of absolute predestination, which dominated the lectures and writings of many English scholars in the latter half of the sixteenth century. According to Calvin, predestination meant that God, acting of his own free will, elects some people to be saved and others to be damned – thus, the individual has no control over his own ultimate fate. This doctrine was the source of great controversy because it was seen by the so-called anti-Calvinists to limit man's free will in regard to faith and salvation, and to present a dilemma in terms of theodicy. At the time Doctor Faustus was performed, this doctrine was on the rise in England, and under the direction of Puritan theologians at Cambridge and Oxford had come to be considered the orthodox position of the Church of England.[20] Nevertheless, it remained the source of vigorous and, at times, heated debate between Calvinist scholars, such as William Whitaker and William Perkins, and anti-Calvinists, such as William Barrett and Peter Baro.[21] The dispute between these Cambridge intellectuals had quite nearly reached its zenith by the time Marlowe was a student there in the 1580s, and likely would have influenced him deeply, as it did many of his fellow students...

Words: 829 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Hu4640

...other people or governments. In today’s religious views, freedom teaches us the facts of God’s plan for salvation that every individual person has a choice to make, to either accept or reject God’s gift of salvation (Bennet (2009) http://www.freewill-predestination.com). Christians today see life towards destiny. We live and die after we live our lives. Fate is usually a predetermined course of events beyond our control. Whatever happens, happens, and there is nothing we can do to change it. Destination has its course. The Bible teaches man that we were created to make moral choices and that he is responsible for those choices. Everyone has their own story towards their life towards their predestination. According to Calvinism, the Good News of the Gospel said “God only loves and saves those whom He choose to love and save. Everyone else God...

Words: 569 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

How to Plan

...liking the way there was more freedom instead of being restricted by rules of traditional society. (B) Using material from item A and elsewhere, assess the contribution of religion to social change? There are many ways in which religion may have contributed to social change, but there is however the argument that religion tries to keep society the same by conservative force. Most religions have some sort of conservative force that it sticks to, for example keeping to traditional beliefs such as monogamy, attending church on a Sunday, opposing to divorce, contraception, cohabitation and abortion and also sticking to the nuclear family way of life where the male is the sole breadwinner. Weber argues that the religion beliefs of Calvinism helped to bring about major social change specifically the...

Words: 759 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Paper

...I. Introduction Predestination is a Christian doctrine, which falls under the larger philosophical rubric of determinism. Calvinists especially adhere to the doctrine of predestination. There are two aspects to the Calvinist belief in predestination. The first declares that God basically has ordained everything that occurs, or will occur. In regard to salvation, the Calvinist code of predestination is more specific: Scripture teaches that there are certain people – ‘the elect’ – who are chosen by God, through Christ, to be called to Christianity, and thus be saved for eternity. Calvinist interpretations of predestination often get into trouble over issues of free will; indeed, some interrogate the notion of God’s omniscient power to create all events and actions, given the fact that humans clearly possess the power of free will. II. Part One a. Theological Definition Predestination is a Calvinist doctrine, which governs the degree of control which God exercises over the affairs of human beings, and, indeed, all things that occur on Earth. Calvinist predestination insists that God basically has determined all things which have occurred, and will occur. A second meaning is also accorded to predestination by Calvinists. ‘Predestination,’ in this sense, refers to the notion that God gave to some grace, which grants them eternal salvation, while to the remainder is allotted eternal damnation, owing to their sins. The former state is referred to as ‘unconditional...

Words: 1021 - Pages: 5