Free Essay

Capitalist and Free Trade

In: Business and Management

Submitted By jameswise347
Words 2401
Pages 10
Capitalist and Free Trade

Name:
University:
Instructor:
Course:
Date:

Capitalist and Free Trade
“The primary reason that nearly 1 billion people have been taken out of extreme poverty in the past 20 years has been capitalism and free trade”
This is according to an Economist article “Towards the End of Poverty” (June 1st 2013) which claimed that the global poverty has gone down due to economic growth that has been seen certain nations. Nations like China and India are a good example, their standards of living has developed tremendously as well as the conditions of people in those countries.
The article is of the belief that Africa should be the next region to experience growth and good standards of living (Singh, 2009, 874). Nations like Nigeria, and Ghana are examples of countries in Africa with good standards of living which is attributed to trade and investment. Similarly, the countries are putting much effort in doing away with social issues that connected to below par education, health and communications (Gibbs, and Leech, 2009, 186). The article goes on to state that in the year 2050, ‘extreme poverty’ would be something that is non-existent. The article goes to discourage anti-capitalists from complaining regarding the negative issues arising from free trade and markets. They called upon to allow capitalist to grow as it has been noticed as a success in the 21st century.
With no regard accorded to the massive contrast of wealth in today’s world, the millions of unemployed persons and the constant deaths of babies due to preventable diseases, the article goes on to call for additional global trade (Banik, 2009, 117). Through this, high levels of poverty would be brought to a decline.
The focus of the article in according praise to capitalism is a good instance of the ‘Taliban economics’ which is followed by market evangelists. These evangelists are of the thought that freed markets will over nations the biggest individual autonomy and overall security (Singh, 2009, 890). For those that follow it, believe that those that criticize it fault in their economic aspects and may adversely affect those that follow it.
The political impact of the undesirable praise for the profit system can be seen; in the rise that capitalism lacks the inability to solve poverty in world, be it extreme or otherwise. There is therefore no need to have another option for the social system (Gibbs, and Leech, 2009, 188). Logic has not been given its rightful due. Capitalism which has been the main cause for poverty is now accorded all of the praise for being the remedy for poverty to several nations.
Questions rise on if capitalism should be accorded all of the praise for reducing poverty that is noticed in billions of people globally (Wade, 2008, 12). This calls for focus on extreme poverty and how it has spread with time.
Extreme Poverty
Extreme poverty is a state that is attributed to adverse deficit in the basic human needs like food shelter and clothing as well as cleans sanitation and education. The state is more reliant on access to this resources rather than available income.
This definition was not taken in well by the United Nations in the year 1996. People like Wresinski declined to go with the capitalist origin of the problem with a new definition being acquired by the World Bank later. The World Bank defined extreme poverty as someone who lives below $1.25 a day (Schumpeter, 2013, 62). They did not involve the profit system and the connection to poverty in defining poverty. Presently, several instances of extreme poverty is said to be found in the sub-Saharan part of Africa. This poverty can be attributed as being acquired from a section of the ignored working class (Wade, 2008, 7).
In the year 2000, the United Nations undertook stringent efforts to do away with extreme poverty in the confines of capitalism. This effort comprised of private ownership of ways of producing goods and services as well as distribution, competition with nations and the production of goods and services for profit. Several countries agreed to this objective and signed a contract about the same. Capitalism was of the belief that it will lead the countries with extreme poverty to success (de Soto, 2000, 74). Huge trust was placed on capitalism for bringing people to riches or reducing the number. However, a decade later the objective it was set out to achieve did not materialize. Capitalism had failed to achieve its objective and instead led to the increase of the people living in extreme poverty. In September 2010, the UN met to look at the progress that had been made. Report suggested that with 830 million people living in poverty and starvation, the number had since gone up to about 1 billion (Wade, 2008, 20). Food had been a great issue that led to extreme starvation of several other people in 2010. The initiative failed to give every person 2720 kilocalories per day.
The economist who wrote the article among other supports of capitalism ignored the failure of the millennium development goals of the UN (Socialist studies, n.d.). The reality was that capitalism had failed to reduce or even eradicate poverty in nations. The reason as to why the initiative did not meet the goals it set out to achieve was attributed to the limitations it had in meeting the needs of people through profit.
The proponents of the initiative ignored that fact that capitalism had brought about several problems in climate change. This had the impact of affecting future of people in terms of food production and the access to water.
There are several facts that have led to the failure of free trade, free markets and capitalism. About half of the population in the world is able to access sufficient income, the live below dollar a day (Socialist studies, n.d.). This is a huge number that grows daily and is hard to manage. Several children who are the future of several nations are close to a billion and live below the poverty line. Reports by the UNICEF, state that about 22,000 children pass away every day because of poverty. Several people living in the sub Saharan and other parts of the world do have access to clean water Socialist studies, n.d.). This number according to the UNICEF is about 1 billion, with 443 million children skipping schools annually due to the diseases that arise from taking unclean water.
In the year 2011, over 165 million children below the age of 5 years had suffered from stunted growth as a result of poor nutrition. Extreme poverty has led several people not to eat a balanced diet hence suffer from malnutrition. The number has since grown over the years with the efforts being applied not proving viable. This number adds up to the 870 million people in the world that do not have food to eat (Cousins, 2009, 894). What they take is not sufficient. Some eat once a week while others insufficient meal after a long period of time. This poverty has led several children that lack the basic amenities to suffer from preventable diseases like diarrhea and pneumonia. As a result, over 2 million children died annually due to the inability to access treatment from poverty.
The year 2011 has led to over 19 million children to go without vaccination. This spells doom for this families and generally the countries as the able population would drop from inability to access medication (Socialist studies, n.d.). Additionally, poverty has led to a quarter of the human population to go without electricity. This tends to affect the storage of goods for trade as they go bad fast leading to losses.
The Capitalist Class
The capitalist class owns most of the world’s means of production and distribution but only to a section of the population. Most of these rich people are not concerned about the welfare of the poverty stricken nations of individuals. They swim in excess wealth and other secondary needs.
In the present world, about 1 percent of the rich capitalists control close to 39% of the resources the world has available. Reports states that this number has been gradually increasing over time and is bound to reach unimaginable levels in future (Botha, 2003, 830). The Boston Consulting Group’s Global Wealth report state that the wealth of these rich capitalists has grown at about 8% in 2012 to $135 trillion. The leading 1 percent wealthy population manage about $ 53 trillion of the world’s resources, while those worth $5 million manage about a quarter of the resources the world has to offer.
The instances of extreme poverty can be prevented. The barrier to acquiring this is the private ownership of the means of producing goods and services and distribution, the countries condition and the objective of the profit. In simple terms, what makes sure that these problems are still existent is capitalism. This problem has grown from one generation to another with time.
Socialism in the world would have done a much better role in alleviating poverty (Posner, 2009, 23; Socialist studies, n.d.). Extreme poverty would be non-existent and the people living in India and China would face the same situation as the early working class that were there in 1800s as stated in Fredrick Engels book, The Condition of the working class (1844). In the frame of practical and reasonable model of ownership and democratic control of means of production and distribution, people are able to create products and issue services so as that they satisfy their basic needs. Everybody would be able to access their basic amenities. Politicians, charities among others should not be accorded the mandate to resolve this social problem (Socialist studies, n.d.). The economists on the other hand do not have a good understanding of capitalism, how and why it brings about poverty.
Poverty is connected to class and capitalism as a disintegrated society. Capitalism has not played any role in reducing poverty but it has only increased. Wage slavery has taken the place for agrarian system (Bernstein, 2006, 449). Poverty is now not a natural state but it is now brought about by capitalism and production of goods and services and profit transaction.
Capitalism separates the individuals that are not able to pay for products and with the help of the wage system, stresses on rationing model on the working class. This shows that what one can buy with their wages and what their families need are completely different.
Capitalism and poverty are connected in regards to production. Here is where the working class is exploited and poverty arises (Greenhalgh, n.d., 1093). In situations where capitalism is low, the working class sell their labour force or power to operate as a commodity to the capitalist for wages. In the production process the employees create products that have value than the raw products; the machines and labour that create the goods. According to Max, these value (surplus value) is where the unearned income of interest and profit comes from for the capitalists.
The surplus value arises from the exceptional nature of the labour power. This value is determined by quantity and quality of labour applied in production (Greenhalgh, n.d., 1094). It arises through the fact that the working class does not get its wages for the labour used but for the ability.
In the process of working, the working class goes through two time sessions; vital and surplus labour time. While in the vital or necessary time the class creates value the same as the wages workers need to facilitate their basic needs in food, shelter and clothing among others.
The necessary time may be about 5 hours in a 7 hour working day, the extra hours are done for free. According to Marx, this is the surplus labour time which leads to a surplus value which leads to profit after going through the market process (Posner, 2009, 46).
Class and the exploitation that comes with it lead to poverty since one does not have access to the means of production and distribution. The individuals involved in the daily working are not accorded what they need but what their earnings can afford them to buy. This describes poverty be it the standards of living rises or drops, if the rate of pay goes up or down.
It is clear that the economists and those of the same believe are wrong in the thought that capitalist can lead to end of poverty. Capitalist cannot end poverty but lead to its increase. The presence of private ownership of means of production and distribution and the aspect of profit will lead to poverty for the world (Socialist studies, n.d.). Wealth will only be accessible by a small section of people.

Bibliography
Banik, D. 2009. Legal empowerment as a conceptual and operational tool in poverty eradication. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 1, 117–31.
Bernstein, H. 2006. Is there an agrarian question in the 21st century? Canadian Journal of Development Studies, XXVII (4), 449–60.
Botha Joubert 2003. Capitalism, Inequality, Poverty and Professor Terreblanche. South African Journal of Economics, volume 71, Issue 4, pp. 830-886.
Cousins, Ben 2009. 'Capitalism obscured: the limits of law and rights-based approaches to poverty reduction and development'. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36: 4, 893 - 908 de Soto, H. 2000. The mystery of capital: why capitalism triumphs in the west and fails everywhere else. New York: Basic Books.
Gibbs, T. and Leech, G. 2009. The failure of global capitalism: from Cape Breton to Colombia and beyond. Cape Breton: Cape Breton University Press
Greenhalgh, C. (n.d.). Why does market capitalism fail to deliver a sustainable environment and greater equality of incomes? Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 29, Iss. 6 pp. 1091- 1109.
Posner, R 2009. A Failure of Capitalism: The Crisis of '08 and the Descent into Depression. Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, J. 2013. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Routledge.
Singh, N. 2009. Fighting rural poverty, inequality and low productivity through legal empowerment of the poor. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(4), 871–92.
Socialist studies (n.d.). Is Capitalism Ending poverty? Acquired on 13th September 2013 from: <http://www.socialiststudies.org.uk/article%20poverty.shtml>
Wade, R. 2008. Financial regime change? New Left Review, 53, 5–21.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Free Trade

...xBrittney Johnson 5/2/12 Economics Free Trade Free trade is a system in which goods, capital, and labor flow freely between nations, without barriers which could delay the trade process. There are many nations that have free trade agreements, and several global organizations promote free trade between their members. There are a few arguments both for and against this practice, ranging from economists, politicians, industries, and social scientists. A few barriers to trade are struck down in a free trade agreement. Taxes, tariffs, and import quotas are all eliminated, as are subsidies, tax breaks, and other forms of support to local producers. Restrictions on the flow of money are also lifted, and regulations, which could be considered a barrier to free trade. Free trade enables overseas companies to trade just as efficiently, easily, and effectively as local producers. The idea behind free trade is that it will lower prices for goods and services by encouraging competition. Local producers would no longer be able to count on government subsidies and other forms of assistance, including quotas which force citizens to buy from local producers, while overseas companies move in on new markets when barriers to trade are lifted. In addition, free trade is also supposed to encourage improvement, since competition between companies triggers a need to come up with original products and solutions to capture market share. Free trade can also substitute global cooperation, by......

Words: 1450 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Free Trade

...Fair Trade and its impact on impoverished nations. By Edwin C. Mercurio “When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint.When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist.” Dom Helder Camara Fair trade advocates told a European Union Conference that fair trade works. “It works for the poor people; it works for consumers. It works as a business model; it works as sustainable development; it works to protect the environment; it works as an idea." reports the Fair Trade Advocacy Newsletter. But there is growing concern about the theory and practice of the Fair Trade movement. Despite its anti-capitalist rhetoric, it is seen as a revised form of free trade controlled by the G8 and economically dominant countries,which are continually held responsible for global trade injustices. Fair trade is often presented as a fair way to help banana growers. However, the dominance of corporate power - Del Monte, Chiquita and Dole - leaves poorer farmers and nations with an uncertain future and destroyed ecosystems. Their dominance is built on the exploitation of lands and workers from developing countries. There are indications that fair trade is used as a cover by transnational corporations to expand their corporate interest. Even more disturbing, according to Matthias Schmeizer of Institute Fusoziale Dreigliederung, is how Nestle (known as 2005’s “least responsible company” worldwide and one of the four big coffee roasters responsible for the coffee......

Words: 591 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Free Trade

...Free trade means eliminating all restrictions in trading between two countries. Some of those restrictions are tariffs or quotas. Imagine that you have a country A and a country B who wish to trade with each other. Country A has plenty of coal and has mastered efficient ways how to produce coal thus making coal price very cheap. Country B only has little coal reserves, and it's extraction method are not as efficient as in country A. Consequently, the price of coal is lower in country A other than country B If country A wants to export coal to country B it has to pay tariff. Tariffs are kind of a tax. Tariff is calculated on the price or amount of coal. It must be paid by either exporter from country A or importer from country B. Like every tax, tariffs increases the price of product. Therefore, consumers in country A will pay lower price of coal than country B. Also country B can impose quotas, a restriction on quantity allowed to be imported. For example country A is allowed only to export 10 tones of coal per year, not more. Even if it has plenty coal to export it is not allowed to do it. Low supply of coal in country B rises the price of coal for them. On the other side, country B produces great and quality wine, which residents of country A absolutely love. They have tried to make exactly same wine, but it's quality simply couldn't match that of country B. But they also have to pay tariffs if they want to export it. At the end price of the same......

Words: 528 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Free Trade

...Free Trade: Free trade is a system in which goods, capital, and labor flow freely between nations, without barriers which could hinder the trade process. Many nations have free trade agreements, and several international organizations promote free trade between their members. There are a number of arguments both for and against this practice, from a range of economists, politicians, industries, and social scientists. A number of barriers to trade are struck down in a free trade agreement. Taxes, tariffs, and import quotas are all eliminated, as are subsidies, tax breaks, and other forms of support to domestic producers. Restrictions on the flow of currency are also lifted, as are regulations which could be considered a barrier to free trade. Put simply, free trade enables foreign companies to trade just as efficiently, easily, and effectively as domestic producers. World Trade Organization The World Trade Organization (WTO) is the most powerful legislative and judicial body in the world. By promoting the free trade agenda of multinational corporations above the interests of local communities, working families, and the environment, the WTO has systematically undermined democracy around the world. Unlike United Nations treaties, the International Labor Organization conventions, or multilateral environmental agreements, WTO rules can be enforced through sanctions. This gives the WTO more power than any other international body. The WTO's authority even eclipses national......

Words: 402 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Free Trade vs Fair Trade

...world trade growing substantially, we are all uniquely interconnected. International trade, and policies surrounding it are a key discussion point for politicians and citizens of nations worldwide, with poverty and development often mentioned when discussing these subjects. As the World Bank puts it, “Trade is a key means to fight poverty and achieve the Millennium Development Goals. It allows countries to import ideas and technologies, realize comparative advantage and economy of scale, and foster competition and innovation to increase productivity and achieve higher sustainable employment and economic growth.” (World Bank, 2013) Many economists have attributed much of the global economic growth down to free trade agreements, with the relaxing of tariffs, duties and quotas seen worldwide. Despite the widespread adoption of free trade agreements, fair trade is still relatively minimal. Some proponents of fair trade have compared it to the Code of Hammurabi, the earliest known legal code which claims the law is to ‘promote the welfare of the people and to cause justice to prevail in the land, to destroy the wicked and the evil that the strong might not oppress the weak’ with the opinion that fair trade can be used to prevent incredibly rich people and organisations from using trading relationships in the oppression of the vulnerable and weak and impoverished which is what occurs in free trade. (Northcott, 2006) Influenced by theorists such as Foucault and Gramsci, free trade......

Words: 2709 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Free Trade

...Advantages and disadvantages of free trade In international trade theory, globalization and free trade results over the long term in "commodity price equalization" across countries; or if capital, labor and technology are highly mobile, free trade and globalization is only for rich countries. “Free trade” means freedom to trade. Freedom is a concept and principle that everyone holds dearly, except dictators and bullies [1]. We are going to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of free trade in both cases: the poor and rich countries. The aim of this work is to look into the particularities of free trade. In order to achieve this aim we shall present tasks as following: * Define the concept of free trade; * Explore advantages of free trade; * Find out of disadvantages of free trade. Free trade occurs when there are no artificial barriers put in place by governments to restrict the flow of goods and services between trading nations. When trade barriers, such as tariffs and subsidies are put in place, they protect domestic producers from international competition and redirect, rather than create trade flows. It is in the case of poor countries due to we can’t be competitive with development countries such as Germany, Europe. Some groups, however, have a double standard. They want all their consumption needs and production inputs to be liberalized and to be available at bargains, but want their own products and services to be protected from competition. It......

Words: 910 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Free Trade

...Charles W. L. International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace. 9th ed. New York:           McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2013. Print. Free trade is referred to as no attempt by the government to influence citizens on whether or not to impose restrictions on what they can purchase from another country, as well as what the citizen can produce and sell to another country. The benefits of Trade Country’s economy may gain if its citizens buy certain products from other nations by a rise in living standards and income. Gains arise due in nature that international trade allows a country to specialize in the manufacture and export of products that they can produce efficiently as known as Absolute Advantage. “Consumers benefit in the domestic economy as they can now obtain a greater variety of goods and services. The increased competition ensures goods and services, as well as inputs, are supplied at the lowest prices” (NSW HSC online). Disadvantages of free trade * With the removal of trade barriers, structural unemployment may occur in the short term. This can impact upon large numbers of workers, their families and local economies. Often it can be difficult for these workers to find employment in growth industries and government assistance is necessary.
 * Increased domestic economic instability from international trade cycles, as economies become dependent on global markets. This means that businesses, employees and consumers are more......

Words: 488 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Free Trade

...U.S. free trade agreements with other countries have a negative impact on U.S. job opportunities. Free trade is a form of business cooperation in which different countries share their resources and trade with each other with free or lower tariffs (Eiras, n.d.). Free trade can be presented in the forms of importing products such as coffee and vegetables directly from other countries and outsourcing process to other countries. Although it is possible for one country to produce all goods efficiently, it will be more productive for this country to trade with other country. Both countries can benefit from trade because each country specializes in what they have a comparative advantage. Free trade offers more advantages to each country since there are no trade barriers between countries. Nowadays, with the trends of globalization, free trade is becoming more and more commonplace. Some people argue that free trade creates job opportunities while increasing the growth of economy. Riley (2012) states that total U.S. employment significantly increased after the U.S. signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and joined the World Trade Organization (WTO). However, opponents focus on the negative impact which is job losses inside the country. Column (2011) points out that it cost 2.8 million jobs for trade between the U.S. and China. Trade deficit between countries and outsourcing during free trade lead to job losses eventually. Therefore, with the integration of global......

Words: 1136 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Free Trade

... Executive summary Free trade refers to trade between countries without tariff and non-tariff barriers on exports and imports. In another word, free trade refers to trade without government interference. Classical economists such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo have advocated that free trade improves the economic well being of a country by increasing the production of a country and allowing efficient allocation of resources, thus increasing global production and promoting peaceful and prosperous global environment. In the global basis, World Trade Organization formed after GATT in 1995 promotes trade liberalization through multilateral negotiation. On the other hand, in the regional basis, countries are forming regional economic integration to promote free trade stage by stage. The initial stage is known as Free trade areas (FTAs) under which they agree to remove tariffs and non-tariff limitations on trade in products between themselves. Despite all these initiates, governments around the world are still imposing various restriction on trade between countries to protect its own industries such as agriculture which is considered as the backbone of a country. Therefore, this report will discuss the concept of free trade, trade theories and the advantages and disadvantages of Free Trade for consumer, business, environment and politics. Also analyze why a region need Free Trade Area, benefit for developing countries. Summarize advantages and disadvantages of Free Trade for......

Words: 4391 - Pages: 18

Free Essay

Free Trade

...From Producer to Consumer The Responsibility of the Market in Free Trade Elissa Hoston Strayer University Free trade has enable consumers and businesses to adjust to each other’s needs. Capitalism has expanded the market to sell its products and pool cheap labour. However, the demand of each component of the market has caused unethical activities that negatively impact the consumer and the producer. On the producer side, unethical activities arise from the pressure to meet performance objectives. Due to this, the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) was established to protect the consumers from the exploitation of capitalists (Smith, 2011). No matter what laws are established, the consumers are the ones who should take action as they are the ones who can protect themselves from the capitalists’ exploitation. It is the consumers’ responsibility to be informed and educated of the products that they are consuming. Companies produce products depending on the needs of their consumers. These products, before being released in the market, undergo tests and trials to fit the consumer’s needs. Especially in the food industries, the quality of the product is the number one priority of production companies because they know that if only one customer acquire an illness due to the product, the company will be sued for their products. This will cause their products to be pulled out in the market and will cause them a fortune to face the lawsuit. Consumers......

Words: 768 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Free Trade

...Free trade and employment has a connection that has become one of the world’s most significant concerns because of how the markets interact with one another. Both are able to affect millions of lives around the world. Free trade plays a critical part to boosting the global welfare and employment sectors of the world. Some economists have finally realized that free trade leads to numerous advantages in the labor sector for everyone involved. Unfortunately, free trade can impact the domestic job market; first of all, production on the domestic market will be replaced by imports; second, economic activity restructuring, and third, loss of revenue from tariffs in place (Jansen, & Lee, 2007). For example, trading can trigger several business closures and job losses; simply put, free trade can have significant impact on job creation and job destruction and can be positive or negative on the labor market and policy creation for employment in the domestic environment. The overall point is to have a positive impact on the employment in terms of the number of jobs created, the salary or wages paid to workers, and it can also be a combination of both (Jansen, et al., 2007). Two other impacts that free trade has on job creation policy is the changes in the distribution, and efficiency of the nation (McConnell, Brue, & Flynn, 2015). To some extent the labor market will shrink while the skill and/or capital industries will increase to a larger size; but all in the countries that......

Words: 694 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Free Trade

...Free Trade Free trade agreements or FTAs are arrangements between two or more countries or trading blocs that primarily agree to reduce or eliminate customs tariff and non-tariff barriers on substantial trade between them (Economics Online, 2015). Supporters of free trade agreements do argue that free trade is good for nations because FTAs have proved to be one of the best ways to open up foreign markets (International Trade Administration, 2014). Countries seek many benefits by joining an economic bloc. Some of these benefits include an expanded market, enhanced productivity, innovation and competition, greater bargaining power in world affair, economic growth and direct investments from members outside the bloc (Froning, 2000). Foreign companies prefer to invest in countries that are part of a trade agreement because it usually gives them access to other member countries within the block (Reuss, 2001). The main economic bloc for my country is the North American Free Trade Agreement or NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement, 2012). Bloc membership has brought many advantages to the US. Bloc memberships have reduce barriers to U.S. exports, and protected U.S. interests and enhanced the rule of law in the FTA partner country (International Trade Administration, 2014). Bloc memberships have created a more stable and transparent trading and investment environment and made it easier and cheaper for U.S. companies to export their products and services to trading partner......

Words: 461 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Free Trade

...1.0 Introduction Free trade is the unrestricted purchase or exchange of good and services between countries without imposition of constraints such as quotas, tariffs and duties (Kent, 2004). It is a win-win situation as free trade enables a country to emphasis on their core competitive advantages which can boost up income growth, at the same time maximizing economic output. In other words, free trade allows a country to specialize on certain product that they has the distinctive comparative advantage (Herrmann, 2000). On the other hand, it usually benefits the developed countries whose most of the big firms are looking to sell and expand their goods or services abroad due to it is a great opportunity for them to open up an international market. In fact, Malaysia is an actively pursuing free trade agreements with numerous countries, therefore, free trade might bring some positive and negative impact for Malaysia (Esther, 2014). Free trade benefits Malaysia such as enhance product quality and production efficiency, wider consumer choice lead to increases in standard of living and also reduction in unemployed resources. However, free trade will also cause some issues for Malaysia involved local firms unable to compete with foreign market, reduction job opportunity, environmental damaged and free trade may encourage dumping (Edge, 2010). 2.0 Advantages of Free Trade 2.1 Raise Competition and Lead to Improve in Product Quality Nowadays, many people are willing to......

Words: 2218 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Free Trade

...Free Trade A brief definition of free trade is: Free trade refers to a general openness to exchange goods and information between and among nations with few-to-no barriers-to-trade. Some people argue that free trade is no good to society and is only bad for Americans. But I would have to disagree with these people because there are a lot of reasons that free trade can be good to society. For the argument that it is important to keep jobs in the United States, this is true that people would rather have jobs in the United States and that the U.S auto industry loses 5,000 jobs to foreign competitors, which those households are worse off. On the other hand, the millions of other Americans that can purchase less expensive, more efficient cars, from wider range of car manufacturers, they are better off. If another nation is more efficient and has a comparative advantage in producing a product, then it is in our best interest to buy from that nation. Sure it would be nice to keep the jobs in the United States, but at the same time one has to think that free trade is a good idea because the economy is saving money. People say that we are exporting jobs when auto manufactures set up plants in Mexico, but a counterargument would be that if Mexico is the least expensive place to assemble the vehicles, from the economic standpoint, that is where it should be done, as long as it can be done with the same level of quality. Another reason why free trade is a good idea is because it......

Words: 754 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Free Trade

...Hagai M. Segal September 29, 2015 Why Free Trade is Superior to Mercantilism The Industrial Revolution brought great success to the British Empire. It helped establish the Empire as one of the leaders (if not the strongest) of the European powers that would colonize lands all over the globe. By the end of the 18th century, Britain had amassed global economic power, and needed to regulate it somehow. The British government's plan of action was to enforce regulations on trade in order to keep control of what was produced, and what would benefit the motherland most. Adam Smith, arguably the most influential economic theorist in modern history, coined this system as 'Mercantilism,' and felt it was not optimal. Economic development and growth is inhibited by the mercantile system because resources are not allocated for maximum efficiency. For Smith, natural tendencies for exchange rooted in the self-interest of individuals would lead to an improved standard of living. Mercantilism was situational. As described by the Library of Economics and Liberty, it is a "system of political economy that sought to enrich the country by restraining imports and encouraging exports." Economic nationalism is another way to perceive it. The system originated in the 16th century when European powers began fighting over resources, often leading to armed conflict between each other (LaHaye, 2004). The objective of the mercantile system was to sustain a trade surplus, while maintaining high......

Words: 1226 - Pages: 5