Premium Essay

Case Analysis - Cadbury Beverages, Inc. Crush® Brand

In: Business and Management

Submitted By mky777
Words 940
Pages 4
Running head: Cadbury Beverages, Inc.: Crush® Brand

Cadbury Beverages, Inc.: Crush® Brand
Shih Ming Chang
Grand Canyon University
MKT 450
July 24, 2011

1.) Three main participate in manufacturing and distribution of carbonated soft drinks in the United States: concentrated producers, bottlers, and retailers. The concentrated producers’ and bottlers’ responsibilities differ for regular and diet drinks. Bottlers are responsible of serving retail outlets, such as placing in-store displays, local advertising, and restocking, whereas concentrated producers are responsible of developing new products, national consumer advertising, promotion programs, and marketing research. There are approximately 40 concentrated producers in United States, but only top three (Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and Dr. Pepper/7Up) account for 82% of industry sales. Whereas approximate 1000 bottlers in United States and they are either owned by concentrated manufactures or franchised. Franchised bottlers are usually given the exclusively rights for a certain territory, but they cannot sell a directly competitive brand. As far as retailers concerned, the main retail channels are supermarkets, vending machines, and fountain services. In fact, over 40% of the soft drink sales are sold in supermarkets which are claimed to be crucial in the company’s distribution net.
2.) During the period of 1985 to 1989, the total sales in the orange carbonated rinks’ category increased by 23.5%, from 102 million cases to 126 million cases. This change was due to the launch of Mandarin Orange Slice (MOS) and Minute Maid Orange (MMO) by PepsiCo and Coca-Cola, respectively, in 1986. Both companies introduced products with intensive advertising, promotion and distribution-rejuvenating efforts. As a result of the above change, market shares of main competitors, Sunkist and the Cadbury’s Crush brands, had gone down…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Cadbury Crush Case

...Cadbury Crush Case StudyCadbury Schweppes is an important player in the American soft drink market where American consumers drink more soft drinks than tap water. In conjunction with population growth and rising per capita consumption there was an estimated $43 billion in retail sales in 1989. However, trend data suggests that sales of diet drinks accounted for a large portion of the overall growth of carbonated drink sales in the 1980’s with supermarket sales the key to successful soft drink marketing. Despite being the fourth largest soft drink marketer in the United States, 71.4% of the total market was produced by Coca Cola, PepsiCo or Dr. Pepper/7up. However, Cadbury has carved out a niche in the non-cola segment of the soft drink industry where their brands were often the market leader in their specific categories. With their acquisition of Crush in 1989, Cadbury controlled 22% of the orange category of the soft drink market through Crush and Sunkist. The orange category has the third largest share of the market, with a market share of 3.9%. For families with/without children, Crush is an all natural orange flavored carbonated beverage, which blends all natural ingredients that create an exclusive zesty formula because only Crush is filled with natural vitamins. Ultimately, Crush is better for your health than colas. After purchasing Crush, Cadbury executives needed to restructure the Crush brand to gain a higher market share while neither contradicting its current......

Words: 1256 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Case Study: Pomodoro, Inc.: Food and Beverage Industry.

...Case Study: Pomodoro, Inc.: Food and Beverage industry. USA employment related Laws and Regulations which includes Anti- sexual harassment and a comprehensive interpretation of the laws as they apply to Pomodoro, Inc. Introduction: Pomodoro, Inc. will need to become familiarized with the employment laws and regulations that are governed by the United States Department of Labor and the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. This paper will give a summary of each law or regulation. This position paper is going to brief the audience globally on the USA employment laws and regulations but not limited to Sexual harassment, Wage and Salary Legislation, Recruitment, Interviewing, Affirmative Action, Equal Employment and the ADA. This paper will go over the history of a few of the important acts that have been passed over the years to protect employees in the United States. It will also discuss the major protections that these acts provide and who are eligible for that protection. Now that the Pomodoro, Inc. is now a global business environment, the working individual overseas are relying on paid work, to make a living, and for the social and economic wellbeing of the community where they live, and encouraging more and more people, organizations, even nations to concern about the employment relationship. ('UK'). What is Employment Law and why is it important? Employment laws are put into place to protect employees from any mistreatment by their......

Words: 1206 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Case Analysis, Apple, Inc.

...Case Analysis, Apple Inc. 1 Case Analysis, Apple Inc. 1 of 4 Case Analysis, Apple Inc. 2 This case analysis is written to analyze the topic of Strategic Management and answering the question of why it is critical to the success of an organization in meeting its goals and mission. This analysis will address the major issues surrounding the organization or individuals involved with the organization, will identify alternate courses of action to address the issues identified with a decision/recommendation for action. Once called Apple Computer and historically know for its Macintosh personal computers (PC) line, Apple Computer dropped the latter part of its name in 2007 and became Apple, Inc. Even though non-PC product lines drove the majority of Apple’s financial performance there still seemed to be no real change in the company’s strategic profile. There were several thousand people that were laid off and by lying off employees to try and fix their financial issues, could have been a portion of the problem (Yoffie & Slind, 2008). Jobs are what contribute to a company’s effectiveness. If the jobs had been retained and management had attempted to find new ways of conducting business to survive by being innovative, Apple, Inc. may have witnessed success earlier (Mello, 2011, pp 112-115). Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and John Sculley came on board and made great strides towards increase in effective marketing, partnering with other companies and joint......

Words: 950 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Crush - Market Analysis

...4 - Industry economics p.5 - Brands & Products p.6 - Consumption behavior p.7 II- Changes in the orange category during the period 1985-1989 - Orange category p.8 - Relation between market share & market coverage p.11 - Relation between market share & advertising share p.13 - Brands positioning p.15 III- Cadbury competitive position in the US - Swot analysis p.16 IV- Crush Positioning p.18 V- Crush advertising & promotion program - Objectives & strategies p.18 - Advertising budget p.19 - Crush advertising budget p.20 VI- Crush Pro forma Income statement p.20 VII- Conclusion p.21 Sides p.22 INTRODUCTION Cadbury Beverages, Inc. is a beverages-manufacturing division of Cadbury Schweppes PLC. It was created in 1969 by a merger of Schweppes PLC (1783, London, the first world’s soft drink maker) and Cadbury (1830, Birmingham, a major British confectionery manufacturer). In 1989, the Cadbury Schweppes PLC was one of the world’s largest multinational companies and the world’s third largest soft drink marketer (behind Coca-Cola and PepsiCo), with worldwide sales of $4.6 billion, performed in 110 countries. Beverages accounted for 60 percent of company sales and 53 percent of its operating income. Additionally, at that time, Cadbury Beverages, Inc. was the fourth biggest soft drink marketer in......

Words: 2893 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Apple, Inc. Case Analysis

...APPLE, INC. CASE ANALYSIS Written by: Jessica A. Mahfoudi AMBA 640 Dr. Larry Williams University of Maryland University College February 25, 2013 This page is intentionally blank   EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Management Information Systems allow companies to remain competitive in today’s fast-paced world and especially when conducting business on the Internet. Organizations must adapt to technological advances and innovations to keep pace with today’s rapidly changing environment (Baltzan, 2012). Every day there is some type of new technology, new internet site, new software or hardware program that someone is learning how to use. Apple, being a major technology company needs to keep up with these advances to keep their customers happy. This paper focuses on Apple, Inc., its competitive advantage and the challenges Apple faces to stay in the top of consumer reports. Data, information, business intelligence and knowledge are discussed and how they are relevant to the production of Apple products. Knowledge cannot be acquired until data, information and business intelligence are researched. The paper then goes on to discuss Porter’s Five Forces Model and how it is applied to Apple, Inc. and its products. Apple has lowered the threat of substitute products by including a great variety of features on all of their products. Since the original iPhone's release about four years ago, the threat of substitute products or services has greatly......

Words: 4317 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Cadbury Case

...James Floyd 9/17/13 Mk: 4900 Cadbury Beverages, Inc: Crush Brand Case Analysis I will be doing a market analysis for crush by analyzing the company (Part 1), identifying the industry and competition (Part 2), and conclusions and recommendations (Part 3). Part 1: Company Analysis - Important Company Information To Note: - Cadbury Beverage, Inc. is the beverage division of Cadbury Schweppes PLC. (a major soft drink and confectioner marketer) - Sales of $4.6 billion in more than 110 countries - Cadbury Schweepes PLC is one of the world’s first soft drink maker - In 1989, Beverages accounted for 60% of company world wide sales and 53% of operating income. o Confectionery items accounted for 40% of worldwide sales and produced 47% of operating income. - Overall goal for managers on Crush brand: o Rejuvenate the bottling network for the brand, o Develop a base positioning, o Create a new advertising and promotion program. Part 2: Industry Analysis - Cadbury Schweppes 3rd largest soft drink marketer. - Cadbury Schweppes had some key acquisitions of companies. - In 1989, Proctor & Gamble bought Crush for $220 million. - Cadbury Schweppes has a 3.4% market share of the carbonated soft drink market. - 3 leaders o Coca-Cola o PepsiCo o Dr. Pepper/7Up - Americans consumed an estimated $43 billion in retail sales in 1989 - 3 Major......

Words: 969 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Cadbury

...Problem Definition * Case Issue * Industry Analysis * Environmental Trends * Macro Factors * Competition and Competitors * Industry Trends * Customer Analysis * SWOT Analysis * Recommendations * Implementation Plan | 2334557881011 | EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: History: The company was started in 1783 in London as the world’s first soft drink maker. In 1880s Schweppes expanded worldwide and in 1960s the company diversified into food products. In 1969 Schweppes merged with Cadbury which was a cocoa making business started in England in the 1830s. Year | Acquisition | 1986 | Canada Dry soft drink brands | 1989 | Certain soft drink brands and purchased Gini brand of Belgium. | 1989 | Crush brand from Procter & Gamble for $220 million. | Cadbury Beverages, Inc., a beverage division of Cadbury Schweppes PLC acquired the Procter & Gamble brands namely Crush, Hires and Sun-drop in the year 1989. They had to re launch those brands into the market because those products were paced out by their competitors. This case especially deals with the Crush brand(an orange drink). Kim Feil who joined the division in 1989 as a Senior Product Manager for managing the re launch of Crush soft drink brand. There had been a lot of discussions regarding the crush brand. After making a thorough industry review, competitors positioning and the image which Crush has on its customers mind the senior marketing executives at Cadbury Beverages, Inc decided to focus......

Words: 2621 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Case Analysis Abc Inc

...Case Analysis - ABC, Inc. Scott D. Mullen COMM/215 April 17, 2014 Shannon Pickard, MLA Case Analysis - ABC, Inc. Introduction The hiring process is a long and tedious process, but it must be completed with professionalism and accuracy. Business owners hire recruiting experts to find employees that will be the best fit and will portray the professionalism they desire for their company. Now that prospected employee is hired, the biggest obstacle is to retain them. “Be prepared with the tools, paperwork, and equipment new employees will need to do their job safely and effectively from day one.” (Swafford, 2014). Background The case being reviewed involves a new employee who is in charge of the hiring process for ABC, Inc. With only six months experience in the company, Carl Robins has been tasked with the hiring of 15 new employees and setting up an orientation for them. He was entrusted by Monica, the Operations Supervisor, to have all of the orientation requirements done, in order to complete the hiring process by June 15th. Unfortunately, on the day of orientation, Carl discovered many of the required paperwork and necessary tasks to start the orientation was not completed. Key Problems The portrayal of professionalism within a business is the first impression a new employee will see when they are going through the orientation process. Is the company asking the right questions to the new employee? Is the company providing the necessary information and......

Words: 1457 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Cadbury Beverages Case

...Cadubry Beverages Inc. Crush Brand #3 Company History * The company has the distincition of being the worlds first soft drink maker * It first started in London in 1783 where Jacob Schweppe sold artifical minderal water * After introducing many other products inclduing water, lemonade, gingerale, and food products they merged with Cadbury a major British candy maker in 1969 * 1989 one of largest multinational firms and ranked 457th in BusinessWeek’s Global 100 * in 1989 the company purchased Crush, Hires, and Sundrop soft drink brands from P&G for $220 Million * this is when our case takes places, the marketing excutives at Cadbury are left the with task of relaunching these brands and we will be focusing on crush * they also own brands such as schweppes, mott’s, Holland House, Hires, and many more * currently bevarges make up 60% of sales and confectionery items make up the rest * they are also the market leader is some of their categories such as Canda Dry leading in ginger ale maket, which accounts for 39% of Cadbury soft drink sales in U.S. * worldwide headquarters is in Stamford, Connecticut #5 Strengths * high brand: many of their current brands and ones they recently purchased have high * first soft drink maket: which gives them a trusting reputation * 3rd largest soft drink mareter: behind coke and pepsi Weaknesses * Due to decision that P&G made when the had owned Crush they stopped using......

Words: 648 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Cadbury Beverages

...City Memorial Park 6. Renovation and Expansion of General Santos City Hospital into Tertiary Level - Fernandez St. (20 Million Pesos courtesy of DOH) Plus: Additional Multi - Million Peso Fund from International Donors (e.g. World Bank, UNICEF and etc) Unknown Construction: 1. 2 Storey Building in Apopong Highway 2. Building in Apopong Highway beside Forest Lake 3. 4 Storey Building in Santiago Blvd. infront of The Medical Plaza 4. Building Construction in Santiago Blvd beside Security Bank 5. Building Construction in J. Catolico Beside Shell Station Lagao 6. 2 Storey Building beside Collado - Pendatun Ave 7. 2 Storey L - shaped Apartment - Calina St. LAGAO 8. 2 Storey Building - National Highway besides Sunshine Corn Mill, Inc. Proposed/Rumored Projects: Private Sector: 1. SM City General Santos City (2011) - Santiago Blvd. 2. NCCC Mall of General Santos City (Proposed) - NCCC Compund National Highway 3. Microtel Inn and Suites (Proposed 2009) - National Highway 4. East Asia Royale Expansion - 68 Rooms, Pavillion and Swimming Pools (March 2009) - National Highway 5. University of Santo Thomas (2011) - Brgy. Ligaya 80 hectares 6. Apopong Shoppers Plaza (billboard) - National Highway, Apopong 7. McDonalds 2nd branch (Proposed) - National Highway 8. Phoenix Gasoline Fuel Depot (TBA) 9. Expansion of Holy Trinity College - Guinto, Purok Malakas 10. Establishment of Mindanao Polytechnic College IT Park - (Waiting for PEZA approval) 11.......

Words: 839 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Apple, Inc. Case Analysis

...Unit One – Case Analysis: Apple, inc. Strategic Human Resources Management Unit One – Case Analysis The intended goal of this paper is to explain strategic management and why it is crucial to the success of an organization in meeting its goals and mission. The focus will be on the case study provided by the Harvard Business School on the company Apple, Inc. from the year 2008. I will give a brief overview of the case and identify issues or problems therein. Alternate solutions to solve the problems Apple, Inc. faces will be identified. The best solution to permanently resolve these issues and problems and an implementation plan will be outlined. The computer circuit board, named Apple I, created in a garage on April Fools’ Day 1976 was the beginning of Apple, Inc. Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, and A. C. Markkula Jr., the creators, became the industry leaders in 4 years, finally launching their IPO in 1980. Since its inception, Apple has fought to continually and steadily increase its market share and profits worldwide. Technical innovation has been no problem for this company with its numerous devices available. Their competition from Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Acer, and others and trying to compete made the company falter. According to Slind and Yoffie, Hewlett-Packard led the market share with 18.8% and Apple followed with a mere 2.6% in 2007 (2008, pg. 21). But after some hard work and diligence on Jobs’ end, Apple once again began to flourish. One obvious problem......

Words: 992 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Case Analysis - Apple Inc

...Unit 1 Case Analysis: Apple Inc. Background In January 2007, Apple Computer Inc was renamed Apple Inc. after 30 years of being a very productive organization. Apple Inc. changed from being known as strictly a Macintosh computer company into a diverse technology company that is known for its art, video, and graphics. They presented this diversity by selling new products such as; the Ipod used together with the iTunes store and the iPhone. In 2008, Apple Inc earned a profit of $1.07 billion from revenue of $7.46 billion. Over half of Apples income was generated from the sales in these new products (Yoffie &Slind, 2008). Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak founded Apple Computer in April 1976. Their first computer was called the Apple I. Apple Computer was incorporated in 1977 by bring on another partner, A.C. “Mike” Markkula, Jr. With the help of Markkula, Jobs and Wozniak introduced the Apple II computer in 1978. The Apple II drove the PC industry up to $1 billion in annual sales in less than three years. Apple, of course was the industry leader by selling more than 100,000 Apple IIs by the end of 1980 (Yoffie &Slind, 2008). Apple Inc. Obstacles In 1981, IBM entered the market with its DOS operating system and a microprocessor from Intel. This made them competitors for Apple because IBM’s system was one that other producers could clone. Apple saw a 6.2% drop in their market shares in 1982 and the net income fell 17% between 1983 and 1984. This left the company in......

Words: 1590 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Case: Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.: Energy Beverages

...Case: Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.: Energy Beverages Texas A&M Corpus Christi Marketing Management MKTG-5320 Case: Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc.: Energy Beverages Introduction Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. decided in September of 2007 to explore the profitability of expanding into the energy beverage market. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. is a major competitor in the flavored carbonated soft drink (CSD) market, and also has a strong presence in the non-CSD market. The energy beverage market had an estimated $6.2 billion in retail dollar sales in 2006. The market grew at an average annual rate of 42.5 percent between 2001 and 2006, however, market industry experts estimated an average annual growth rate of 10.5 percent between 2007 and 2011. This slowing of growth was due to a number of factors: market maturity, an increase in price and packaging competition, and new entrants to the market in hybrid energy drinks, ready to drink energy teas, and energy colas. Analysis Strengths The strengths of Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. include: * A network of bottling and distribution throughout the United State, Canada, and Mexico * Stable cash flows * Substantial portfolio of diverse and well known CSD and non-CSD brands with a position as the number one CSD company in the United State. * Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. believes is holds a competitive advantage with its integrated business model * Strong customer relationships Opportunities ...

Words: 792 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Cadbury Beverages Inc Crush Brand

... p.4 - Industry economics p.5 - Brands & Products p.6 - Consumption behavior p.7 II- Changes in the orange category during the period 1985-1989 - Orange category p.8 - Relation between market share & market coverage p.11 - Relation between market share & advertising share p.13 - Brands positioning p.15 III- Cadbury competitive position in the US - Swot analysis p.16 IV- Crush Positioning p.18 V- Crush advertising & promotion program - Objectives & strategies p.18 - Advertising budget p.19 - Crush advertising budget p.20 VI- Crush Pro forma Income statement p.20 VII- Conclusion p.21 Sides p.22 INTRODUCTION Cadbury Beverages, Inc. is a beverages-manufacturing division of Cadbury Schweppes PLC. It was created in 1969 by a merger of Schweppes PLC (1783, London, the first world’s soft drink maker) and Cadbury (1830, Birmingham, a major British confectionery manufacturer). In 1989, the Cadbury Schweppes PLC was one of the world’s largest multinational companies and the world’s third largest soft drink marketer (behind Coca-Cola and PepsiCo), with worldwide sales of $4.6 billion, performed in 110 countries. Beverages accounted for 60 percent of company sales and 53 percent of its operating income. Additionally, at that time, Cadbury Beverages, Inc. was the fourth biggest soft drink marketer in the US......

Words: 2906 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Cadbury Beverages

...Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. Case Analysis Akua Porter Davenport University MKTG 610 Online Instructor: JoDee Phillips January 29, 2012 Case Synopsis Almost all Americans have consumed at least one soft drink beverage over a year time span (Kerin, 2010). Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc is the largest division of Cadbury Schweppes PLC (Kerin, 2010). “Cadbury Schweppes PLC is the world’s third largest soft drink company, and the fourth largest confectionary company with product sales in over 200 countries” (Kerin, 2010). Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. is among one of the three major concentrated producers in the U.S. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc. owns 2% of market share in the soft drink beverage industry (Kerin, 2010). Cadbury Schweppes is known as the world’s “first soft drink maker”, and the “world’s largest non-cola soft drink producer and marketer” (Kerin, 2010). The company has several national brands and regional brands that are top leaders in the soft drink industry. Squirt was marketed by Dr. Pepper/Seven Up Inc. in the 1990’s by Cadbury Schweppes PLC (Kerin, 2010). In 1938 Herbert Bishop created a carbonated drink that required less fruit and sugar to produce (Kerin, 2010). The new drink “seemed to squirt onto the tongue just like squeezing a grapefruit” (Kerin, 2010). Squirt became a popular soft drink product in the 1950’s. Throughout the 70’s Squirt transitioned into a “brand that was a mainstream soft drink” (Kerin, 2010). Squirt is a caffeine......

Words: 1805 - Pages: 8