Free Essay

Case Report on the Live Case Study “Euthanasia”

In: Social Issues

Submitted By Zdorego
Words 2423
Pages 10
Introduction:

Death can be perplexing to anyone. It drains people emotionally and leaves a void in our hearts which can never be filled. Natural deaths are still easier to accept by labelling it as the ultimate truth of life. However, the ethical issue we have taken up is about death which is induced before time. The background setting for our live case is the very debatable issue of “Euthanasia”. Literally, euthanasia means “Good Death” (Greek: eu = good, thanatos = death). More formally, euthanasia means the intentional act or practice of painlessly putting to death persons suffering from an incurable and distressing disease as an act of mercy, which is not necessarily at the request of the patient.

Forms of Euthanasia:

• Voluntary euthanasia: When the patient has requested the death. • Non-voluntary: When the patient has not made any request and gave no consent. • Assisted suicide: Someone provides an individual with the information, guidance, and means to take his or her own life with the intention that they will be used for this purpose. When it is a doctor who helps another person to kill themselves it is called "physician assisted suicide." • Euthanasia by Action: Intentionally causing a person's death by performing an action such as by giving a lethal injection. • Euthanasia by Omission: Intentionally causing death by not providing necessary and ordinary (usual and customary) care or food and water.
Euthanasia evokes a mixed reaction among people who come across it. For some, it is unimaginable to end a human life and yet some think it is justified to end a life which is not worth of dignity. There are several moral and ethical issues concerning this topic and we will examine it in detail in the later part of our report.
The Live Case:
Pinki Virani, a writer, moved a writ petition in the Supreme Court asking that feeding be stopped to Aruna Shanbag, a nurse living in a vegetative state at KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India. The Aruna Shanbag case has been making headlines once every couple of years for the past 38 years. She slipped into her vegetative stage after being strangled with a dog chain while being raped by a ward boy on 27’th November 1973. Aruna was 25 years old then and working at KEM. The blood supply to her brain was cut off, and for close to four decades, she has been confined to bed, force-fed by nurses and doctors at the hospital.In her petition, Ms. Virani said that the continued vegetative existence of Aruna is a violation of her right to live with dignity.
The Aruna case is an ethical black hole. The main question is: no one knows whether Aruna wants to die or not. The only relationship that Pinki Virani has with Aruna is that she has written a book about her. How can a third person, no matter how noble the intention, ask for a stranger’s death? Human Rights people may argue that it is solely on humanitarian grounds that the case must be decided. But how can it be convincing? The crux of the problem lies in deciding that one person who judges whether another’s life is meaningful or not. While we debate the merits and demerits of euthanasia, discuss well-meaning emotion battles with hard-headed reasons, Aruna Shanbag still languishes in her vegetative state in a hospital bed.

Ethical Issues involved in the case:

Death is a natural part of the development process in the life cycle. But the management of death is a controversial topic because efforts to postpone or hasten death have medical, legal and ethical ramifications. Euthanasia is not supported universally as there are several aspects of it which are neither absolutely right nor absolutely wrong but fall somewhere in between. This positioning makes it an ethical issue which is always debatable.

Medical Ethics:

The question is obviously very difficult to answer because different people have different views depending on their stand on euthanasia. Some people deem it unethical thinking of the potential abuse, or its religious implications. On the other hand, prolonging life beyond a certain point seems as unethical as anything else.

No physician or facility would have to comply with assisting a terminally ill person hasten dying. The responsibility of medical treatment rests mutually with the patient and physician, not with just the physician. Then, it also becomes the patient’s responsibility to either resolve the issue with the physician or seek alternative care.
Is physician-aid-in-dying a violation of the Hippocratic Oath?
Strictly going by the Hippocratic Oath which clearly states that “I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for, nor will make a suggestion to this effect” then euthanasia is clearly a violation of the oath. This has been one of the main arguments of the medics against euthanasia.

But abortion which was considered a serious violation of the Hippocratic Oath 20 years ago is now legal: Euthanasia may have the same fate. Apart from these considerations, Hippocrates in his book Epidemic has clearly stated that “If a doctor cannot do any good then he must be prevented from doing harm”, so in this regard Hippocrates does seem to be inclined towards supporting euthanasia.

Legal Issues:

Euthanasia is legal in very few countries of the world such as Belgium, Netherland, Switzerland, Luxembourg and few states of USA such as Oregon and Washington DC . Other nations are yet to legalize it and face several dilemmas to make it a law. “The difficulty the law faces is that everything becomes a precedent,” explains Dr Pandya of KEM hospital, Mumbai, India. If it is made legal, it can evoke a chain reaction which at some point could become a disaster. The other reason that makes the Government tread with caution is its uncertainty about public opinion. It requires a massive public support to make euthanasia legal which could be difficult to obtain in countries where several religious sects reside.

Religious Issues:

To a great extent, our religious beliefs and our cultural upbringing shape our thoughts to living and dying. Religion becomes a guiding force to accept prevalent norms. Euthanasia has been a debatable issue mainly because of the religious beliefs. Almost all religions, be it Hinduism, Christianity, Islam or Buddhism condemn euthanasia. For the believers, life is a gift from the almighty and only he has the right to take it away. They argue that human beings should not meddle in these matters.

However, in some religions like Hinduism and Buddhism, alleviating sufferings of fellow human being is regarded as the “Dharma” and this allows some flexibility to discuss the issue of Euthanasia. Religions which strictly adhere to the ancient preaching however strongly go against the act. Christianity is against this issue but in countries where it is legal, majority of people follow this religion which again leaves the matter to the judicial system of the country.

Business aspects in Euthanasia

Euthanasia is not only confined to the religious, legal or moral battles. There is another side to this issue which is of economic costs, profits and losses. Since, the issue itself is not legal in many countries, the business side is overshadowed mainly due to the fact that it is prohibited in their country. Even in countries where it is legal, physicians and other health care providers, may pressure patients to request assisted suicide to save resources in the hospital. It can also lead to moral corruption among the physicians and the relatives of the patient to gain monetary benefits.

In developing countries like India where half of the population lives in extreme poverty, providing medical facilities to their loved ones is a distant dream. Even the hospitals lack facilities to provide sufficient care. The medical equipments to sustain terminally ill patients may not be available for a long time. In such cases, euthanasia might be encouraged not to alleviate the patient’s suffering but only for cost containment. Drugs for assisted suicide cost about $75 to $100, making them far less expensive than providing medical care which can influence decision if an employer or company is paying for the medical costs. For H.M.O.s (health-maintenance organizations) profits come not through providing services but from limiting costs, which means reducing services in some cases. This implies that they are in favor of euthanasia only because it would help bring down their costs. Insurance companies may lobby euthanasia for the same reason which means instead of regularly paying back for the high medical expenses, they would have to pay a onetime amount.

Different Perspectives:

As humans, we have a responsibility towards our fellow human beings. Love, Compassion and the ability to act and work towards righteousness makes us what we are. In deciding for another human being, be it our own blood or not, we should think whether the act is truly helping the one who is suffering. The decision to let go should be a collective one and should not be based on any singular identity. While the respect for life is well pointed out through so many aspects, there is a whole new dimension to living with dignity and self-respect. We wonder how many of us actually would like to live a life where we would have to let go of our independence completely and surrender to another human being even for a very basic and minor chore.

Also, there are other questions to ponder upon like who should be given the right to decide the end of life and what is the threshold of pain? People might have several reasons for putting their loved ones to eternal sleep but how do we rationalize their intentions? How can it be assured that there is no moral corruption in the intention? The threshold of pain varies from person to person. What might be unbearable for one could be a minor pain for another. Whose opinion should be considered while making such decisions?

We choose to list the arguments for and against euthanasia before we recommend any actions.

Arguments for euthanasia:

The most widely used argument for euthanasia is that it alleviates the suffering of a patient. Voluntary organizations like the “Right to Die” organizations across the globe support euthanasia for the vast majority of terminally ill patients. They insist that a patient in a persistent vegetative state, or one who has lost the will to live due to a terminal and painful disease, be allowed to die according to his own wishes, peacefully and with minimum pain in his last moments.

Euthanasia provides a way to end a low quality life mainly due to the vegetative state of the patient. How much the patient lives must also be compared to how well he or she is living i.e. focus on a qualitative life rather than a quantitative one.
In developing economies where poverty is wide and resources narrow, euthanasia helps free up medical funds & resources to help other patients who might survive if timely help can be provided through the use of ventilators and other medical equipments.
If the patient is in a condition where he/she can state his/her will to die, then euthanasia becomes a matter of choice. Euthanasia can support the right to die with dignity rather than live in utter distress and humiliation.
Arguments against euthanasia:
The argument against the act mainly comes from religious belief which says this act devalues human life and shows no respect for the sanctity of human life. In all religions, life is a gift from god and only he has the right to take it away.
In countries where it is legal, it might promote Euthanasia tourism where patients go or are taken to euthanize. In Switzerland, tourists are also allowed for euthanasia if it comes from the patient’s will to die.
It can become a means of health care cost containment especially if the cost bearer is another organization. The intention to euthanize a patient can never be judged correctly and moral corruption could be rampant if it is legalized.
For many it is plain hope that improved technology might help alleviate/cure disease and hence a patient should not be euthanized. Hope is subjective but for a mother it can be never ending and hence she may reject euthanasia if it is about her child.
Even if voluntary euthanasia is made legal, it can cause a slippery slope effect which means it could later be modified to involve other cases too.

Hence, there are several pros and cons to the issue of euthanasia. Any decision must be taken after careful review and consideration of the case on individual basis. Euthanasia should be never be generalized and made legal to suit the general mass. We think it should always be based on case-to case basis where individual is given the priority rather than anything else.

Our Recommendations and Justifications for the Aruna Shanbag case:

Aruna Shanbag is a victim of misfortunes. While we sympathize with her, we also are saddened by the quality of her life. While we are nobody to decide whether she should live or die, our group thinks that there is no dignity in the way she is living her life although there was no fault of hers. She was a young and independent woman when the carnal instincts of a ward boy made her a victim crippled for life. It has been 38 years since she has been bed ridden and in a permanent vegetative state. The chances of her coming back to life and leading a normal life are nil. Even if by some miracle she came back to life, what would be her sentiments when she realizes that her most precious and productive time of life were spent lying in a hospital bed? How furious would she feel to find out that she is now 60 years old and absolutely helpless? Would she be able to handle the magnitude of the incident? After 38 painful years in the bed, would her body support her now? How will she deal with the rage that will engulf her for the rest of her old age? Although, we are not in favor of Euthanasia in general cases, we think Aruna deserves to die with dignity and be liberated from the misery of prolonged unproductive and vegetative life. And with due respect to our respective religions, we believe, a rebirth is what Aruna needs to liberate herself from the horrendous present.

[pic]

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...University Press 0521804167 - Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy: An Argument Against Legalisation John Keown Frontmatter More information EUTHANASIA, ETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY An Argument against Legalisation Whether the law should permit voluntary euthanasia or physicianassisted suicide is one of the most vital questions facing all modern societies. Internationally, the main obstacle to legalisation has proved to be the objection that, even if they were morally acceptable in certain hard cases, voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide could not be effectively controlled; society would slide down a slippery slope to the killing of patients who did not make a free and informed request, or for whom palliative care would have offered an alternative. How cogent is this objection? This book provides the general reader (who need have no expertise in philosophy, law or medicine) with a lucid introduction to this central question in the debate, not least by reviewing the Dutch euthanasia experience. It will interest readers in any country, whether for or against legalisation, who wish to ensure that their opinions are better informed. john keown is Senior Lecturer in the Law and Ethics of Medicine, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge. His previous publications include Abortion, Doctors and the Law (1988) and Euthanasia Examined (1995). © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521804167 - Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy:...

Words: 3306 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...This essay will demonstrate that it is not “always morally worse to kill than it is to let die”. It will be argued that passive euthanasia (i.e. letting someone die) is not morally wrong and that active euthanasia (i.e. accelerating their death) is no less moral. However, the many complications associated with the legalisation of active euthanasia (and euthanasia in general) must be identified and addressed. These identified complications may be eliminated with an appropriate regulatory regime. Assuming that identified complications can be overcome, and having established that it is not always morally worse to kill than to let die, it will be demonstrated that active euthanasia should not be banned. Morality, as defined by the Oxford Dictionary, is “principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behaviour”1. Hinde states that the principles are influenced and changed by one’s society and culture but also “based in human nature”2. As morality is influenced by society, public opinion is important when it comes to controversial issues. Morality differs from place to place and evolves over time. To compound this diversity, changes in medical treatment, and discoveries which enhance medical knowledge evolves rapidly and what was not even conceivable in some cultures or at certain points in history are now commonly accepted. Developments in end of life care fall within this category. With our increased ability to prolong life, arguments can now be made...

Words: 3595 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Bioethics

...http:// www.academicjournals.org/INGOJ ISSN 1993–8225 © 2008 Academic Journals Article Euthanasia – A dignified end of life! Vaibhav Goel Faculty of Law Addis Ababa University Addis Ababa Ethiopia. E-mail: vaibhav_hnlu@yahoo.co.in. Accepted 27, October 2008 Survival is undoubtedly valuable but some time and in certain condition life becomes painful and impossible or unbearable, in that stage survilance seems, like a curse or abuse. Euthanasia – a new word for masses become common about four years back in the month of December 2004 because of Venkatesh plea for granting him right to die. Euthanasia is nothing else but a permit or license to the medical professional for ending the life of a person in question. No doubt if it will be permitted in laws, may be the biggest threat to the creature. In fact the concept is debatable; here the key question is “What should be the ingredients of law which would legalize Euthanasia?” Hence the purpose of writing this paper is to examine the questions pertaining to Euthanasia, especially in the light of traditional perspective besides legal dimensions of MTP and to suggest legal aspects of the same to make life with dignity even at the time of end. In addition the second key question may be that if it permitted weather it will be on the recommendation of the doctors or in the consent of the relative of the Patient? Keywords: Euthanasia, PAS, Suicide, Religions on Suicide Right to Die, Mercy Killing, MTP INTRODUCTION Antipathy is...

Words: 6788 - Pages: 28

Premium Essay

Death with Dignity

...Callie Yager Haley Stoner English 1302 22 April 2015 The Powerful Mercy of Euthanasia Euthanasia is defined as the merciful killing of one in extreme pain or circumstance. For many years euthanasia has been viewed as a way out, against religious and moral perspectives, and many are afraid that if it were to be completely legal in all of the United States then citizens would certainly abuse this right. However, the four states that have legalized it, Oregon, Vermont, Washington, and Montana prove these opinions to be false. Especially in Oregon the Death with Dignity Act set the precedent for Euthanasia legislature by setting limitations on who or who could not be considered to actively take their own life. These limitations included a minimum age of 18 years, a diagnoses of six months to live or less, two oral recommendations from physicians at least fifteen days apart and one written recommendation from a physician before the patient could be qualified for active Euthanasia. These guidelines made the practice of Euthanasia more practical to Americans. In a study conducted by Public Agenda, Gallup Organization, in the year 1950 only twenty-six percent of Americans supported assisted suicide and that number more than doubled in 2003 to seventy-two percent. These information alone proves the progressiveness of this form of mercy, this form of choice that euthanasia gives to those suffering. Euthanasia has many forms and is a positive act for those in extreme pain, it gives terminally...

Words: 2667 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Healthcare

...Voluntary/Assisted Euthanasia Luellen Lawler, Soma Philip, Annamma Anto, and Janice Haddock Team Green, Grand Canyon University Ethical Decision Making in Health Care 437 V Dr. Ann Leslie Claesson September 01, 2012 Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma, Impact of Voluntary/Assisted Euthanasia There are several topics in the field of biomedical ethics that are controversial and by nature require careful examination of one’s own values and viewpoints. The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of voluntary or assisted euthanasia and the ethical implications it entails in relation to the profession of nursing. Nurses have the responsibility to act in their patient’s best interests. However, that may become difficult in the event that a patient asks for help in the task of ending his or her own life. There were two case scenarios provided for review concerning the topic of voluntary or assisted euthanasia. The common ethical implication among nurses involved in these particular cases seems to be the ambivalence they experience in relation to their level of involvement. Although nurses worldwide are confronted with euthanasia requests from patients, the views of nurses on their level of involvement in euthanasia remains unclear (Dierkx de Casterle, Verpoort, De Bal, & Gastmans, 2006). It stands to reason that palliative care nurses in particular, would have the highest frequency of experience with patients who are requesting assisted euthanasia. To develop clear...

Words: 1348 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...Does Euthanasia Have a Specific Age? He had been ill from birth with a terrible bowel disease and had been in and out of hospital all his life. As his body grew, so did the pain. By the end it was agonizing. It was when Danny Bond was 13 that he started talking about wanting to die. His parents tried to distract him from the idea but nothing worked. "All he wanted was the privilege to be given an injection that would kill him instantly in seconds, and I had to watch him die in days," his mom said. But it was the only way Danny could become the author of his own terrible destiny... (Vallely, P., 2014, February 16). Euthanasia, also known as doctor-assisted dying (suicide), and also termed mercy killing, basically means to take a deliberate action with the express intention of ending a life to relieve persistent unstoppable suffering. Euthanasia can be voluntary that is when the person requests to be killed, or involuntary in which the person will be killed by the decision of someone else and not his own request. Responding to cases like Danny Bond’s case, many countries like Belgium legalized the killing of a suffering child at any age if he requested it. But should children have the right to ask for their own deaths? Euthanasia is against the law in most of the countries all over the world. It is rarely legal in some countries and in this case it would be allowed for adults only. However, some countries, like Belgium, changed the case. Belgium is now on the cusp of becoming...

Words: 1655 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Ethical Dilemmas for Nurses on End of Life Issues

...conference to discuss on ethical dilemmas is thought to be a good way of airing out issues. It is unfortunate that at times a patient in our care may die no matter what we do. Profound ethical questions on end of life issues confront the medical personnel as they watch and wait helplessly. This paper touches on ethics, law, social and public policy as they affect nursing practice. Setting: This is a conference proceedings report augmented with a case study of Nelly from a local setting and compares it with two others from elsewhere which were also presented during the conference. Conference was organized by Federation of African Medical Students Associations (FAMSA), Eldoret 2011. The author was a presenter and discussant. This paper is a compilation of the ideas, inspirations and reflections of the significant sessions and also fulfills some of the recommendations resulting from the distinguished panelists. Objectives: - i) To explore ethical dilemma issues on end of life which have a heavy bearing on Nurses and other health care providers. ii) To explain euthanasia as it relates to...

Words: 5645 - Pages: 23

Premium Essay

Should Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide Be Legal

...EUTHANASIA: The intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his alleged benefit. (If death is not intended, it is not an act of euthanasia) ARGUMENTS FOR EUTHANASIA: It provides away to relieve extreme pain It provides a way of relief when a person’s quality of life is low Frees up medical funds to help people It is another case of freedom of choice ARGUMENTS AGAINST EUTHANASIA: Euthanasia devalues human life Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death There is a “slippery slope” effect that has occurred where euthanasia has been first been legalized for only the terminally and later laws are changed to allow it for other people or to be done non-voluntarily. Opposition overcomes 48 point deficit to defeat assisted suicide - Ballot Question 2 in Massachusetts 1 1 0 Google BOSTON, Nov. 7, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- In a stunning upset, the voters of Massachusetts soundly defeated Ballot Question 2 on Election Day. Dealing a significant setback to the expansion of the assisted suicide movement throughout the United States by Compassion & Choices (the organization formerly known as the Hemlock Society), a diverse coalition of disability rights organizations, medical associations, nurses' groups, community leaders and faith-based organizations united in this effort. "Tonight was a huge victory for those of us in the...

Words: 6383 - Pages: 26

Premium Essay

Legal and Ethical Aspects of Assisted Suicide

...Legal and Ethical aspects of Assisted Suicide Paula Nehrling Grand Canyon University Introduction to Nursing Research NRS-433V Angie Lawson May 01, 2016 Legal and Ethical aspects of Assisted Suicide Only five states in the US have legalized physician assisted death. California is the latest to legalize this and it will be available here in less than a month. There are many legal and ethical questions that nurses have. Some feel like this is murder or against their religious beliefs and others feel like people should have the right to die with dignity. The Oregon death with dignity act was passed more than 20 years ago in 1994, though legal challenges delayed enactment until 1997. Washington followed in 2008, since this time, Montana and Vermont has passed laws supporting physician assisted death. California has passed legislation and will begin next month (Ganzini, L., 2016). The process is very similar in each of these states. They allow a competent adult resident of that state to obtain a prescription from a physician for a lethal dose of medication, for the purposes of causing death through self administration. The law does not allow lethal injection or allow individuals to acquire a lethal prescription through advanced directive to be used when mentally incapable in the future. There are also limits as to when the prescription can be written. Two physicians, one of whom writes the prescription, must confirm that the...

Words: 2149 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...IssUEs Of EUThANAsIA: ARGUmENTATIvE EssAy Bilal S. H. Badr Naga Majd T. Mrayyan (1) Bilal S. H. Badr Naga., MSN, RN, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center in Qassim, Saudi Arabia (2) Majd T. Mrayyan., Prof, RN, The Hashemite University, Jordan Correspondence: Bilal S. H. Badr Naga., MSN, RN, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center in Qassim, Saudi Arabia Email: Bilal_badrnaga@yahoo.com Case scenario Abstract Euthanasia is one of the issues that has been the subject of intense debate over time. It has been a pertinent issue in human rights discourse as it also affects ethical and legal issues pertaining to patients and health care providers. This paper discusses the legal and ethical debates concerning both types of euthanasia. It focuses on both the supporter of euthanasia and the opponent of euthanasia. Several statements for the Euthanasia argument arediscussed: a merciful response that alleviates the suffering of patients which is sometimes wrongly perceived to be otherwise unrelievable; the autonomy in which the patient has the right to make his own choices; the regulation and legislation of existing practices of euthanasia to protect health care providers and patients. In this heated debate religious, political, ethical, legal and personal views are also included. Among all these, those who desperately want to end their lives because they simply cannot go on in any way, are the ones who suffer. Every individual or group has a different viewpoint regarding euthanasia. Euthanasia is considered...

Words: 7058 - Pages: 29

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...by the United Church of Christ, and the Methodist Church on the US West coast. The 'Episcopalian (Anglican) Unitarian, Methodist, Presbyterian and Quaker movements are amongst the most liberal, allowing at least individual decision making in cases of active euthanasia The BBC wrote in an Aug. 3, 2009 online article titled "Religion & Ethics - Christianity: Euthanasia - the Christian View" on www.bbc.co.uk: "Christians are mostly against euthanasia. The arguments are usually based on the beliefs that life is given by God, and that human beings are made in God's image. Some churches also emphasise the importance of not interfering with the natural process of death... Christians believe that the intrinsic dignity and value of human lives means that the value of each human life is identical. They don't think that human dignity and value are measured by mobility, intelligence, or any achievements in life. Valuing human beings as equal just because they are human beings has clear implications for thinking about euthanasia: • patients in a persistent vegetative state, although seriously damaged, remain living human beings, and so their intrinsic value remains the same as anyone else's • so it would be wrong to treat their lives as worthless and to conclude that they 'would be better off dead' • patients who are old or sick, and who are near the end of earthly life have the same value as any other human being • people who have mental or physical handicaps...

Words: 7225 - Pages: 29

Premium Essay

Should Physician-Assisted Suicide Be Legalized in Canada?

...arguing laws that consider the act equivalent to murder are a violation of personal autonomy and infringe the Charter of Rights and Freedom that provides for “life, liberty and security of the person” (Connor, 2014). The hearing sparked fresh debates across the country. Opponents argue that legalizing physician-assisted suicide would lead society down a dangerous "Slippery Slope" that leads to involuntary euthanasia and the killing of people who are thought undesirable. In addition, opponents argue that legalizing physician-assisted suicide gives too much power to doctors and it may reduce the availability of palliative care. The aim of this paper is to make a comprehensive argument in favor of physician-assisted suicide. Physician-Assisted suicide & Euthanasia Physician-assisted suicide occurs for any situation where doctors use drugs or other methods to aid their patients in an effort to die sooner. This is usually done in response to some kind of terminal illness that leaves the person with greatly diminished capacity and extreme suffering. There are some non-terminal cases where people may want doctor-assisted suicide if they have a condition that causes a lot of suffering but doesn’t necessarily lead to death. There has been a lot of...

Words: 2164 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Speech

...Nuela, Jayson G. BSBA-II CAUSES OF EUTHANASIA The causes of euthanasia are usually advanced illness and a person's desire to end the suffering. The effects vary. Those who assist suicides can face criminal charges. They also have to live with ending a life, especially the life of a loved one. What is the difference between euthanasia and assisted suicide? Euthanasia and assisted suicide can be distinguished by considering the act without which the death would not occur. If a third party or a person performs the last act that intentionally leads to patient’s death, then it is called euthanasia. For example, giving a patient a lethal injection or putting a plastic bag over her head to suffocate her would be considered euthanasia. On the other hand, it is an assisted suicide when the patient himself performs an act that leads to death, but has been assisted by a doctor or some other person. Thus it would be assisted suicide if the patient dies after swallows the overdose of drug provided by his doctor for the purpose of causing death. METHODS OF EUTHANASIA When, however, an action or medication is withheld from a patient for the primary purpose of causing or hastening death, this is passive, or indirect, euthanasia. These measures may include the with-holding or withdrawal of ordinary measures such as food, water (hydration) and oxygen. Examples of passive euthanasia are: when food and water is withheld from sick or disabled newborn babies who might...

Words: 2823 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Are We Moving Towards Assisted Suicide

...Student Name: David Mc Namara. Title: Are we moving towards Assisted Suicide? “Those who have exhausted the end seek the right to die with dignity, this is a choice to die, which allows the body to speak its end rather than have that end dictated by the voice of an expert, legal or medical” (Hannifin. 2009, p.84) The person who seeks to die is, to paraphrase Foucault, ‘the Passenger par excellence: that is, the prisoner of the passage’ (Foucault. 1967, p.11) The European Convention on Human Rights sets out a number of fundamental rights and freedoms, right to life, prohibition of torture, prohibition of slavery and forced labour, right to liberty and security, right to a fair trial, no punishment without law, right to respect and family life, freedoms of thought, conscience and religion, freedom of expression, freedom of assembly and association, right to marry, right to effective remedy, and prohibition of discrimination The Council of Europe produced the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in 1950. This body was formed in the aftermath of the Second World War to achieve unity among its members in such matters as the protection of fundamental rights. The Convention was drafted after the atrocities of the Second World War. The Convention was signed by the High Contracting Parties in 1950, and came into force in1953. It was ratified by the United Kingdom in 1957. Article 2 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental...

Words: 7495 - Pages: 30

Premium Essay

Euthanasia Business Ethics

...EUTHANASIA- The “Right” to Die ABSTRACT Euthanasia is one of those Taboo topics that individuals try to distance themselves from due to the fact that it’s a sensitive issue. Most individuals try to take a politically correct stand without evaluating the impact it has on the aggrieved party’s life. Euthanasia in itself may seem a simple issue at the first instance, but by probing deep into the issue we are made to ponder a lot about not only its ethical aspects but also the stakes involved in exercising Euthanasia as a fundamental right of an individual. The dilemma in this issue is a lot more complicated if we were to compare it to other conventional ethical dilemmas because both the stands seem morally right, but there’s a legal perspective which opposes one school of thought and supports the other. Is an individual allowed to determine his death if survival is more of a formality? If so what is the basis of qualifying a case to be a suitable contender for euthanasia? Is the judiciary ignoring this since Euthanasia is an issue faced by a minority? SOME FAMOUS VOICES ON EUTHNASIA: 1. Mr. Ravi B Naik, former High Court Judge and Senior Advocate: (deccanherald.com) “When it is not possible for man to give life, who is he to take it away? We should leave death in the hands of God who gave life. There is no law that allows killing by force till a man dies naturally, nor should there be one. In a situation where it is ‘impossible to live’, people die naturally. When they don’t...

Words: 4456 - Pages: 18