Case Study on Apple, Google and Microsoft

In: Business and Management

Submitted By dialperja23
Words 704
Pages 3
1. Compare areas of strengths of the following companies:
Microsoft
Strengths- Microsoft is still the leader in PC operating systems and desktop productivity software, but is not as strong in the smartphones industry. Mobile computing, cloud-based software apps; its internet portal are also strengths.

Apple
Strengths- Mobile devices, such as iPhones and iPads which combine and contribute 52% of apples business. They already have a head start on the mobile phone industry where they have over 250,000 applications. Apple controls 27% of the mobile market and is the highest grossing cellphone ever.

Google
Strengths- They have absolute advantage in advertising with their search engine. And their Android OS controls 41% of the mobile market share which is constantly growing 3 times faster than the iPhone market share. “They bought Android Inc. to enter the mobile market.” also bought out Motorola for 12.5 billion.

2. Why is mobile computing so important to these three firms?
It has been projected that by 2015 the mobile market will be worth 400 billion. The main reason of this is because there is a 200% growth every 2.5 years. It is important for these firms because they want to maximize profit and market share by being aware of changing trends. 70% of the mobile market is dominated by Apple and Google while Microsoft failed to put its name in the mobile market with less than 3%.

Evaluate the mobile platform offerings of each phone.

Microsoft: Microsoft offers Xbox live service on your phone. With the Windows 7 phone, the 7.5 update and its voice command allows users to open apps, and much more just with voice command. However it’s not as efficient as the iPhone’s Siri
Apple: Apple offers Siri for models iPhone 4s and higher. This is by far the best voice command app in the industry. Apple’s app store is much more superior and perhaps more…...

Similar Documents

Microsoft Case Study

...Summary: Microsoft is an American corporation that develops, manufactures, licenses, and supports a wide range of products and services predominantly related to computing through its various product divisions. Microsoft success in the computer software industry depends on employees who possess extraordinary problem solving abilities and it believes that these abilities can be measured during interviews in which applicants deal with puzzles, riddles, and insolvable questions. Microsoft realizes that its interview practices likely result in missing out on some well qualified candidates but they believe that its much worse to make a mistake of hiring someone who shouldn’t have been (a false positive) than to mistakenly pass over someone who should have been selected ( a false negative). This idea is based on the idea that it is harder to get rid of someone after they are hired and its harder for the company to thrive if too many of their employees cant solve problems under stressful circumstances. Questions: 10.1- Which abilities are measured by the specific question that Microsoft interviewing process? - The cognitive ability and the reasoning ability can measure the specific questions in the Microsoft interviewing process. Cognitive ability- refers to capabilities related to the acquisition and application of knowledge in problem solving. Cognitive abilities are relevant in the jobs that work involves the use of information to make decisions and solve problems...

Words: 533 - Pages: 3

Microsoft Case Study

...Strategies Used by Microsoft to Leverage its Monopoly Position in Operating Systems to Internet Browser Markets Case Summary Microsoft is the world’s largest supplier of computer software. It has dominant market share of PC operating systems with its Windows system. High barriers to entry prevent significant competition in the operating systems market. The primary barrier is that a large number of software programs must be able to interface with any operating system to make it attractive to end users. It would be extremely difficult for any competitor to create a new operating system and create or encourage the creation of completely new software to compete with Windows. However, the development of Internet Browser programs, specifically Netscape, threatened this barrier, by allowing software developers to create software that could run using the browser software as a platform for the program. Therefore, software could be created that could still be used with Microsoft Windows, but would not have to be. Microsoft recognized this development as a threat to its operating system monopoly. Initially Microsoft attempted to divide the market with Netscape, but Netscape refused. To defend its operating system, it set about to overtake Netscape with its own internet browser, Internet Explorer. To defeat Netscape, Microsoft leveraged its operating system monopoly to gain market share in the internet browser market. Microsoft forced computer manufacturers to...

Words: 411 - Pages: 2

Microsoft Case Study

... from Apple and other Linux/Unix operating system has been suffering from Microsoft windows operating system lowest price. The economist from behalf of Department of Justice are analyzing marginal cost of per unit of Microsoft operating systems. Conclusion Microsoft vs. FTC and DOJ has been trialing the case since 1994. certain key issues has been fixed between Government and Microsoft on November 6, 2001. Microsoft can add any functionality to its operating system, can offer any bundled software with OS. and I believe this the fair result by the government in the favor of Microsoft. References Amicus Curiae Brief Of Professor Lawrence Lessig, United States v. Microsoft, Civil Action No. 98-1232 (TPJ). Amicus Curiae Brief Of Professor Nicholas Economides, United States v. Microsoft, Civil Action No. 98-1232 (TPJ), at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/ms_tuncom/major/mtc-00022465.htm U.S. VS. MICROSOFT: THE GOVERNMENT; U.S. to Examine Remedies That Fit the Offense. By: DAVID JOHNSTON, New York Times, 03624331, 4/ 4/2000, at http://web.ebscohost.com.proxy.devry.edu/ehost/detail?sid=cbdabb23-b563-4644-95b4-8777bc62b8cf%40sessionmgr114&vid=16&hid=104&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=a9h&AN=29430551...

Words: 818 - Pages: 4

Microsoft Case Study

...1. In this case yes partnership was the answer. Microsoft was not always as focused on corporate citizenship as it is today. They had a negative imagine of being an unstoppable power buying up everything in their path. So when the Kosovo crisis came to be 1999 Microsoft stood to not only offer help to thousands of suffering people, but to also improve the company’s imagine. These partnerships succeed in doing just that. When both partners stand to gain for the partnership, as they do in this case, then the partnership is the way to go. UNHCR gained all the assistance in helping the refugees, and Microsoft gained a favorable public image. The company can leverage all its assets pro bono publico. Microsoft did in this partnership. They offered cash and software to UNHCR, also the time and expertise of employees, the management skills of executives and online marketing strategy. 2. I would say that Microsoft is creating the right partnerships when it comes to expanding their market and raising opportunities. Years before Microsoft’s partnership with UNHCR, citizens pictured Microsoft as a company that walked all over other companies because they had so much money and power. This created a bad image for them and I feel they needed to make a move to recreate their image. Helping out refugees showed that Microsoft as a company had good intentions and was there for struggling people. Not only did this raise opportunities for Microsoft with all of their new successful...

Words: 531 - Pages: 3

Google Case Study

...1.) How does the changing environment for business affect Google’s ability to communicate in this situation? The changing environment for business affects Google’s ability to communicate because everything is available on the internet now. Google said themselves that they wish to “provide the greatest access to information to the greatest number of people.” Anything that Google does or says in any situation is available for anyone to see. The very product that they are providing can also help or hinder them. If people in the United States and Europe did not have access to Google’s business records online, then they would never know about Google censoring in China. If they did not know, then groups such as Reporters Without Borders would not be able to use them as a launching group for their issues. 2.) Where is the company most vulnerable, from a communications standpoint? 3.) What are the key problems Google faces in this situation? I think that the main problem Google faces in this situation is the Chinese government. I think another problem Google faces in this situation is being able to stay true to who they are and what they stand for. Google has said many times that their main goal is to provide the most information to the most people, so for them to agree to do business in a country that wants them to control what search results appear when something is searched seems extremely out of character for them; and even beyond that, it is extremely difficult......

Words: 268 - Pages: 2

Case Study on Apple, Google and Microsoft

...1. Compare areas of strengths of the following companies: Microsoft Strengths- Microsoft is still the leader in PC operating systems and desktop productivity software, but is not as strong in the smartphones industry. Mobile computing, cloud-based software apps; its internet portal are also strengths. Apple Strengths- Mobile devices, such as iPhones and iPads which combine and contribute 52% of apples business. They already have a head start on the mobile phone industry where they have over 250,000 applications. Apple controls 27% of the mobile market and is the highest grossing cellphone ever. Google Strengths- They have absolute advantage in advertising with their search engine. And their Android OS controls 41% of the mobile market share which is constantly growing 3 times faster than the iPhone market share. “They bought Android Inc. to enter the mobile market.” also bought out Motorola for 12.5 billion. 2. Why is mobile computing so important to these three firms? It has been projected that by 2015 the mobile market will be worth 400 billion. The main reason of this is because there is a 200% growth every 2.5 years. It is important for these firms because they want to maximize profit and market share by being aware of changing trends. 70% of the mobile market is dominated by Apple and Google while Microsoft failed to put its name in the mobile market with less than 3%. Evaluate the mobile platform offerings of each phone. Microsoft: Microsoft...

Words: 704 - Pages: 3

Microsoft/Intuit Case Study

...Microsoft/Intuit Case Study Team 7 Garric Zhang Ling Liao Eric Wang 1. What factors have contributed to Microsoft’s large cash hoard?   | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | Cash and Marketable Securities | 18.9 | 102.7 | 132.5 | 183.2 | 300.8 | Stockholders' Equity | 54.5 | 139.3 | 239.1 | 375.5 | 561.7 | Net Profit | 24.1 | 39.3 | 71.8 | 123.9 | 170.5 | ROE | 44.22% | 28.21% | 30.03% | 33.00% | 30.35% | New Cash and Marketable Securities | 2.8 | 4.1 | 9.3 | 18.6 | 25.2 | New Stockholders' Equity | 38.4 | 40.7 | 115.9 | 210.9 | 286.1 | New Net Profit | 23.5 | 37.4 | 67.5 | 118 | 157.7 | ROE (after adjusted) | 61.20% | 91.89% | 58.24% | 55.95% | 55.12% | Increased ratio | 38.39% | 225.71% | 93.94% | 69.57% | 81.59% |   | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | Cash and Marketable Securities | 449 | 686 | 1345 | 2290 | 3614 | Stockholders' Equity | 919 | 1351 | 2193 | 3242 | 4450 | Net Profit | 279 | 463 | 708 | 953 | 1146 | ROE | 30.36% | 34.27% | 32.28% | 29.40% | 25.75% | New Cash and Marketable Securities | 39 | 57 | 78 | 91 | 105 | New Stockholders' Equity | 509 | 722 | 926 | 1043 | 941 | New Net Profit | 256 | 434 | 669 | 897 | 1077 | ROE (after adjusted) | 50.29% | 60.11% | 72.25% | 86.00% | 114.45% | Increased ratio | 65.67% | 75.40% | 123.78% | 192.57% | 344.43% | From the case, we can know that Microsoft outsold its nearest competitor several time to be the most profitable large public corporation in the world...

Words: 1432 - Pages: 6

Google, Apple and Microsoft Struggle for Your Internet Experience

...BCIS 503 Ch 7 Case Study September 17, 2012 Google, Apple, and Microsoft Struggle for your Internet Experience 1. Compare the business models and areas of strength of Apple, Google, and Microsoft. Although they have different business models and strategies, Apple, Google and Microsoft are three major companies who seek to dominate the internet user’s experience. They come to the platform with their own proprietary strengths. In looking at business models, Apple’s business model focuses on the consumer and bringing them a personalized web experience through their hardware (iPads, iPhones, iPods and iMacs), their two major OS systems: Mac OS X and iOS, and through the internet. Although their model limits what type of software customers can access, they offer over 250,000 apps through their iOS app store. Next, with their browser and search engine, Google centers on advertising and democratizing information where they gain most of their profits. Through the companies Android platform they are increasing their market shares into the mobile market. Google seeks a market of open nonproprietary platforms where consumer can freely surf the web and openly enjoy the innovation of apps across devices. Finally, Microsoft business model concentrates on creating user-friendly operating systems, which 95% of all computers use. They have worked to make technology accessible to everyone. However, they are moving towards services and breaking into the search advertising...

Words: 821 - Pages: 4

Nokia-Microsoft Case Study

... industry is a threat in itself. (One year later, Nokia and Microsoft deliver) Nokia has a clear advantage globally than Microsoft. Although Nokia is losing market they continue to hold an advantage in Latin America and Asia due to their established clientele and operations. Microsoft in contrast is a cash rich company which helped by bringing a significant amount to the alliance. Microsoft aside from having the cash has a very well established software company in which Nokia has definitely benefited. Both Google and Apple have reached unremarkable heights in the cell phone industry. They have invested billions for competitive technologies feeding into the constant change and upgrades in the cell phone industry. Technology is constantly changing and these companies are investing billions to keep up with the change. Competition is extreme and new entrants are constant. In order to survive in an industry which is changing so much and where consumer’s demands and needs are constantly changing alliances and collaborations are crucial. When applying the concepts from the chapter I learned that there is a lot that must be taken in consideration when considering going into an alliance. One company must complement each other in an area that the other lacks. Two companies can be successful and not complement each other. I realized how different both Nokia and Microsoft are but well balance each other. Nokia benefits from Microsoft well established software aspect of their......

Words: 542 - Pages: 3

Apple, Google and Microsoft

...Question 1 Compare the business models and areas of strength of Apple, Google, and Microsoft. Answer Apple:  It has the basis of creating a very strong hardware base for the internet future and thus logically they play their role in this battle by laying emphasis on the hardware that facilitates mobile computing. Apple has gone into the stance that applications, one of the major earners for tablet and phone manufacturers, should be device restricted. For example, one application should be unique to the brand of the device and should be allowed to function in another device from another separate brand. They even stopped Google in its plans to allow Google applications to work on Apple products. Thus by doing this Apple is trying to capitalize on their loyal customer base and create a Apple weds Apple scenario. Google: Google is the believer in the concept that in the future the devices used to run the applications and other internet options should be a fraction of what they are being charged now and instead the revenues generated should be from the in-app advertisements. Google even bought AdMob, an application advertisements development company, to work on such a concept. This future, Google and Microsoft have tried their hand at going hardware friendly but they still do not put the same emphasis on the hardware as Apple. Microsoft: Microsoft has laid its bet on the operating system on which the mobile computing devices shall run. Microsoft also has announced...

Words: 1745 - Pages: 7

Case Study 6 Apple, Google, and Microsoft Battle for Your Internet Experience

...1. Compare the business models and areas of strength of Apple, Google, and Microsoft. Apple: its business model that focuses on centralized control of all its hardware and software. Apple tightly controlled its smartphones and tablets. It means that only apps from its App Store will loaded for its devices, and will function only with Apple platform. Also, Apple is trying to increase its user base; some apps are free, and it allows bring consumers to the Apple marketplace. They even stopped Google in its plans to allow Google applications to work on Apple products (Google Maps). So, by doing it Apple is trying to capitalize on their loyal customer base. Google: its business model focused on the Internet and the Web. Google provides value to the user by using an inexpensive, flexible infrastructure to speed up Web searches and provide its users with a vast array of Web-based services and software tools. After, when Google bought Motorola, it gives Google the ability to make its own cell phones and tablet devices. However, when they tried to enter completely new territory their Nexus One smartphone was unsuccessful. Microsoft: its business model focused on the desktop computer running the Windows operating system and Office desktop productivity applications. While Microsoft is trying to expand its presence on the Internet, it still must try to keep customers bound to the desktop computer. 2. Why is mobile computing so important to these free firms? Evaluate the mobile...

Words: 785 - Pages: 4

Google Case Study

...GOOGLE CASE STUDY Summary: Google was founded in 1995 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin and it was the first popular search engine in the world. They created this search engine so that users can find any website or document on the web based on keyword or exact searches. Google provides free services for their users. Other than the search engine, they can also search books on Google Book Search, news on Google News, videos on Google Video (YouTube) and maps on Google Map. Google is presently the market leader. With the help of competitive analysis and environmental analysis; in this case study we are going to answer the following questions. 1. Review Google’s corporate webpage and annual report. How would you describe Google’s strategy? 2. Prepare a competitor analysis. How would you define Google’s industry? Who are Google’s competitors? 3. Prepare an environmental analysis. What are the major trends impacting Google’s industry? What are the growth prospects for Google’s core business? 4. Do you think Google’s industry is a competitive market, in the technical sense? Does Google have a sustainable competitive advantage in internet search? 5. Would you recommend investing in Google? ------------------------------------------------- Introduction Google Inc. defines itself as a global technology leader which focuses on the ways people connect with information’ Google is a search engine which offers variety of services including the ability to search...

Words: 1994 - Pages: 8

Case Study Chapter 7 – Apple, Google and Microsoft Battle for Your Internet Experience

...CASE STUDY CHAPTER 7 – APPLE, GOOGLE AND MICROSOFT BATTLE for your Internet Experience 1. Google’s biggest advantage is the Internet search holding close to 80% of the entire market. Their business model doesn’t depend on the actual products, but rather the service they offer and the profits are mostly generated through advertising. Apple is the leader in mobile software applications. Apple App Store offers 1.2 million (July 2014) available apps. Their strength is this marketplace and their products that continuously attain all high sales records. Microsoft, on the other hand, is the leader in PC operating systems holding approximately 90% of this market. Their PC desktops are their main strength and they are looking into expanding onto the new mobile platform. 2. The internet is continuously becoming faster and more accessible and with it, the hardware devices and software application of mobile platforms. This represents a multibillion market that those 3 giants are fighting for. So far, Apple has the mobile supremacy because of its app store and the devices that they offer: iPhone, iPad and iMac. Combining very up to date products with a large variety of apps creates a loyal customer base that will be willing to pay a premium price for such products and services. Google has a different approach of the mobile platform going for the advertising network. Google also offers the Android operating system for free to manufacturers while Apple charges 30% of all app...

Words: 510 - Pages: 3

Google Case Study

... strategy of broad-based differentiation and competing based on its wealth of resources and expertise, but eliminate unprofitable and underperforming products such as Google+. Focus on desktop, mobile, and television search, cloud computing, and hardware. This strategy strays from Google’s principle of doing one thing and doing it really well, but branching out into new areas is necessary to compete online, and Google needs to diversify its income streams. Google is known for its culture of innovation and its ability to produce quality products that users want, and so long as it gets its operating expenses under control, it has the money to spend on further innovations. Google other opportunities, especially hardware and Google TV. Google made a name for itself on the early web by providing the fastest, most accurate search engine of its time. Television search is in its infancy right now, and Google has an opportunity to capture this market at the beginning and dominate the industry. Google can also capitalize on the unhappiness consumers have toward Apple and Microsoft hardware products—Apple regarding price, Microsoft regarding quality—to produce mobile phones, laptops, and other hardware that beats Apple on price and Microsoft on quality. Google has an opportunity to diversify its income so that it is not as dependent on advertising. Although Google may stray from its second core competency, it shouldn’t abandon its second core principle completely. While the company is...

Words: 1242 - Pages: 5

Google Case Study

...* Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) is one of the best-known and most admired companies refer to searching information on the Web around the world * Start with student project by two Stanford University graduates—Larry Page and Sergey Brin—in 1996, * Google became the most frequently used Web search engine on the Internet with 1 billion searches per day in 2009 * other innovative applications such as Gmail, Google Earth, Google Maps, and Picasa. * Google grew from 10 employees working in a garage in Palo Alto to 10,000 employees operating around the world by 2009. (Bauer T., 2009) * Over the past few years , Google has grown dramatically and is still developing in the global market. * Competitors and system innovations: * --Portals (Google vs Yahoo, MSN) * -- Planned Payment service ( Google vs EBay) * -- Supported software ( Google vs Microsoft ) In order to survive in this competitive global market, Google have to make Decisions: 1. Google resisted pop-up advertising, because the company felt that it was annoying to end-users. 2. Keeping their employees happy is also a value they take to heart. 3. Google encourages employee risk taking and innovation. 4. Decisions at Google are made in teams based on data. Google stripped the search page of all distractions and presented users with a blank page consisting only of a company logo and a search box. They insisted that all their advertisements would be clearly marked as...

Words: 1746 - Pages: 7