Case Study Guidelines
A case study gives you the opportunity to review Modern Management concepts and apply them to a specific scenario. The analysis should be in summary form and in proper APA format.
• With a minimum of 3 full pages and at least 3 academic sources, prepare a summary analysis of the assigned case study.
• The first paragraph should identify and summarize the key point(s) or problem(s) presented in the case.
• Then type and answer each question posed at the end of the case.
• Describe specific principles from the chapter that can be applied to the case study.
• Try to relate a personal experience that is pertinent to the case study issues.
• You must use at least two additional resources (your text and two others for a total of three) to support your thoughts. Be sure to properly cite your references.
• All papers must be submitted as a document through the Assignment Dropbox. Assignments must be prepared in .doc, .docx, or .rtf format.
APA Guidelines
For the purpose of written case study assignments – all papers must be in proper APA format which includes at least the following:
• A properly formatted header on the upper right corner that includes your name and page number.
• All papers must be double-spaced, with a Times New Roman, Courier New, or Arial size 12 font.
• All paragraphs must be indented 5 spaces.
• References must be properly formatted, double-spaced, with the first line of the entry left justified, and following lines of the entry a hanging indent.
•
Always use the text as a reference – that is where the case study information originates. Be sure to properly cite your reference(s) within the body of the paper.

TO PAY OR NOT TO PAY?
Toyota used to sit on top of the world. It basked in the reputation of building high-quality cars efficiently. It enjoyed unprecedented growth, even surpassing General Motors as the largest car manufacturer in the world. But all of that came tumbling down with reports that cars were accelerating out of control, careening down highways, and putting everyone’s lives in danger. There was even a recording of a 911 call from an off-duty policeman who lost control of his car and died in the ensuing crash. Toyota responded with a recall of historic proportions—nearly 8 million cars in the United States and 1.8 million in Europe. It even suspended sales of brand new models, including the best-selling Camry and Corolla, until the vehicles could be repaired. But still, there was confusion about what was causing the problems—was it the floor mats, the braking system, the software controlling the engine, or something else? Conspiracy theorists argued that Toyota had no clue what was causing the sudden acceleration and that their recall was basically worthless.
By early 2009, your company was in a situation it had not faced for decades—its sales had dropped by 16 percent. Even General Motors, the bankrupt General Motors, which looked like it could do nothing right for many years, grew 8 percent during the same time. According to some journalists, the recall cost Toyota more than $2 billion. But by March 2010, things seemed to be on the rebound. Sales picked up dramatically, 35 percent from the previous year, and 88 percent from the previous month. Customers were once again buying Toyotas and putting their confidence in its ability to produce reliable cars. But just as things seemed to be rosy again, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood announced plans to levy a fine of $16.4 million against your company. The money itself isn’t necessarily a problem. Even with losses, Toyota still made $1.8 billion in the fourth quarter of 2009. The fine would be less than 1 percent of what you earned in just three months. So why not just “take the medicine” as it were, pay the fine, and move on from the whole mess? Because the fine comes attached with a statement that Toyota “knowingly hid” safety problems in order to avoid a costly recall. According to LaHood, “We now have proof that Toyota failed to live up to its legal obligations. Worse yet, they knowingly hid a dangerous defect for months from U.S. officials and did not take action to protect millions of drivers and their families.” So what will you choose to do? You could just pay the fine and admit fault, but if you do, the company’s reputation for quality will take a perhaps fatal blow. You wouldn’t just be admitting that you made a mistake, but that you deliberately lied about it in order to keep making money. What’s more, an admission of covering up would give great support to the hundreds of lawsuits that claim Toyota committed consumer fraud. How much money would those settlements cost? You could, of course, just contest the fine and the admission. But, your company’s reputation is already fragile, and fighting the government (and potentially losing) may make things even worse.
Questions
1. What is your recommendation for how Toyota should approach this situation?
2. What are the decision criteria that should be used in this situation, and how should they be weighted?
3. Under what conditions do you think it is acceptable for Toyota to settle for a “good enough” decision