Case: Mcdonald V. City Of Chicago
Issue: Does the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms create an individual right of citizens to own firearms and does it enforceable against the States.
Decision: Yes, the Second Amendment creates an individual rather than collective right that generally guarantees the rights of citizens to legally own guns
Reasons: While the Court had never previously held the Second Amendment incorporated, they opted to do so here by citing the fundamental nature of self-defense and necessity of the right to bear arms to guarantee self-protection.

Case NFIB V. Sebelius
Issue: Congressional law that requires states to choose between complying with the patient protection and affordable care act or loss of federal funding for Medicaid is constitutionally valid and requiring all citizens to obtain health insurance or pay a penalty is unconstitutional
Decision: Yes, under the Taxing and Spending Clause
Reason: The justices unanimously agreed that the Anti-Injunction Act did not bar the suit. Congress did not intend that the payment for non-compliance with the Individual Mandate be a tax for purposes of the Anti-Injunction Act.

Case: Tarasoff V. Regents of UC
Isssue: Whether when the rapists failure to warn plaintiffs. Tatiana’s parents fear the danger to Tatiana was a breach of duty to safeguard their patient and the public?
Decision: Yes, The rapist owes a legal duty not only to his patient, but also to his patient’s would-be victim and is subject in both respects to scrutiny by judge and jury.
Reason: Since predictions of violence are often erroneous, it is not required that the psychologist render a perfect performance. The therapist must, however, exercise that ordinary skill, knowledge, care ordinarily exercised by those members of the professional specialty under similar circumstances.

Case: Griggs V. Duke Power Co