...had a son, Alan, and a daughter, Judith Gansberg. He also had a brother, Murray, and a sister, Eudice Stadlen and two granddaughters. Mr. Gansberg also won recognition for a front page article he wrote in 1964 about the murder of a young woman named Catherine Genvese, known by friends and family as Kitty. While neighbors may have ignored her cried for help, the article focused national attention on neighborhoods indifference. By doing so Mr. Gansberg’s article told about something that became symbolical in what many people recognized as the beginning of a culture full of violence and apathy in the United States. This case became so important that social scientists still debate the causes of what is now known as “The Genovese Syndrome”. In the short story “Thirty Eight Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call the Police” written by Martin Gansberg published on March 27, 1964, describes a true story that took place in Queens New York on March 14, 1964. The events that took place that night became widely known in American culture to be the cause of what is now known as “The Genovese Syndrome”. It was the birth of a culture that was indifferent and apathetic. The cruel murder of an innocent woman named Catherine (Kitty) Genovese happened in a civilized community surrounded by law abiding citizens, yet no one helped. The lack of action by her neighbors and “friends” became symbolic in America. It was the start of an evolving culture of violence. It...
Words: 1059 - Pages: 5
...Helping People have their own motives for wanting to help someone in need. Some people help because that’s just the type of person they are also known as altruism. There are some that believe that if you help someone, you will be rewarded for that deed; which is also known as the social exchange theory. In some cases, the person who is trying to help another person feels empathy for the person they are trying to help; which is different from sympathy. Empathy is the feeling of oneness with the emotional state of another. Sympathy is a sense of feeling sorry for another person. There are different motives for wanting to help another person in need; but when are we suppose to help? Are we supposed to help a stranger on the street who is trying to feed themselves? What about helping to feed a starving child? Are we supposed to help our family and friends more than strangers? When do we help? These are some questions that everyone should ask themselves. In most cases, some find it easier to walk away from a person in need then to take out time to help. One famous term for not helping a person is the bystander effect. The bystander effect refers to the phenomenon in which the greater the numbers of people present, the less likely people are going to help a person in distress. When an emergency situation occurs, observers are more likely to take action if there are few or no other witnesses (Wagner). In the past forty-six years, there have been many incidents...
Words: 1531 - Pages: 7
...when individuals refuse to assist in an emergency situation when others are nearby. In the past, the probability of help as been believed to be involving oppositely affected variables comparable to the number of bystanders, for instance, the more bystanders, the least likely anyone will help. John M. Darley was the first social psychologist to make obvious the bystander effect. In this experience, an emergency situation is thespian, and the participants are alone or in a group. The experiment will assess the duration of time for the participants to act or to avoid interfering in the situation. The most popular illustration in introductory psychology textbooks of the bystander effect is the vicious slaying of a female named Catherine "Kitty" Genovese. There exist two factors why groups in bystanders’ effect refuse to take action in a crisis; the...
Words: 1549 - Pages: 7
...that murder of Catherine, “Kitty”, Genovese was preventable if any of the thirty-eight witnesses had called the police during the three separate stabbing attacks. In a neighborhood of one-family homes in the $35,000 to $60,000 range, nobody called the police to help the well-known screaming woman in their own neighborhood (2). Winston Moseley, a married, working, and family man, decided on March 14, 1964 to stab Kitty as she was entering her apartment coming home from work. Although she screamed out for help from her neighbors, only one neighbor yelled out to Moseley, who then decided to stab her again. Neighbors responded with only curiosity by turning on their lights and peeking out their windows. At 3:35 A.M., Moseley afraid of the witnesses drove away (2). Kitty struggled to crawl to safety, but Moseley returned to finish his job by stabbing her the last time. Police received their first call at 3:50 A.M. after a neighbor’s long consideration on whether to get involved. Police arrested and charged Moseley with homicide six days after the assault. He also confessed to two other murders. The multiple non-responsive witnesses surprised the police and other citizens who heard the story. Witnesses gave multiple reasons for not taking action such as “We thought it was a lovers’ quarrel” and “I was tired” (2-3). Neighbors did not approach the scene until the ambulance arrived at 4:25 A.M (3). Catherine Genovese’s symbolic brutal murder is now known as “the Kitty Genovese Syndrome” according...
Words: 309 - Pages: 2
...On March 13, 1964, Catherine “Kitty” Genovese, 28, was brutally stabbed to death and raped by Winston Moseley, 29, outside of her apartment in Kew Gardens, Queens, New York (Gansberg; McFadden). The case was brought to the public eye when Martin Gansberg of The New York Times published an article titled Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call the Police. Gansberg’s article suggests that thirty-eight residents of Kew Gardens witnessed Genovese’s murder, but ignored her cries for help instead of calling the police, except for one who called after Kitty was already dead. The bystander effect, the social psychological phenomenon of when people do not help in an emergency situation when others are present, was popularized as a result of the residents’...
Words: 694 - Pages: 3
...The bystander Effect (literally the passer-by effect) can be define as the dispersion of responsibility that can occur during an emergency when people are in a group. The first Study about this effect took place after the murder, in March 1964, of Catherine Genovese (aka Kitty). On her way home one evening after work, she was stabbed to death and then raped in front of her house. This murder caused quite a stir, and it turned out there were at least 38 witnesses present or at least nearby. Of these 38 witness, nobody did anything to help the young woman. A few years later some social psychologists, John Darley and Bibb Latane waged a research called “Bystander Intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility” about why none of the witnesses...
Words: 462 - Pages: 2
...What is Bystander Effect The bystander effect is the somewhat controversial name given to a social psychological phenomenon in cases where individuals do not offer help in an emergency situation when other people are present. The probability of help has in the past been thought to be inversely proportional to the number of bystanders. In other words, the greater the number of bystanders, the less likely it is that any one of them will help. In a series of classic studies, researchers Bibb Latane and John Darley found the bystander effect. In one experiment, subjects were placed in one of three treatment conditions: alone in a room, with two other participants or with two confederates who pretended to be normal participants. As the participants sat filling out questionnaires, smoke began to fill the room. When participants were alone, 75% reported the smoke to the experimenters. In contrast, just 38% of participants in a room with two other people reported the smoke. In the final group, the two confederates in the experiment noted the smoke and then ignored it, which resulted in only 10% of the participants reporting the smoke. Another great example of the bystander effect is a study done by Robert Thornberg (2007). In his study, he observed real- life emergency situations in a classroom. In one incident he describes, a group of 5th graders are coming back from their break and putting away their jackets. One student, Chris, is lying on the floor holding his arm and is crying...
Words: 2375 - Pages: 10
...Katie Wallace Psychology 2301 May 9, 2013 Mrs. Strickland Silent Witnesses: The Kitty Genovese Murder 1. After the 1964 murder of Kitty Genovese, John Darley and Bibb Latane were in shock as the rest of the city/world that a 28 year old lady could be stabbed in a neighborhood with about 38 by standers or more and say or do nothing. Why didn’t anyone try and help her? How could people stand by and watch this go on? People speculated that the failure of people to get involved might be due more to the influence (socially) that bystanders have on each other. To test this theory, Darley and Latane, two psychologists, decided to conduct a study. “Diffusion of Responsibility” Everyone hopes that someone else will be the first to step up and take action. When no one does act, seeing there are other people around provides an excuse for the individual not taking any type of action. I truly believe that most people, not all, have a fear of getting involved in anything horrific, domestic, or just plain wrong because they don’t know the outcome or consequences that that may bring upon themselves. Then you have the people that simply don’t believe in getting involved in other peoples’ drama or situations, so they do hope that someone else will do something because no matter what, they’re not taking any interest in what’s happening. 2. A lot of the reasons for the neighbors not getting involved were absolutely ridiculous! “I didn’t want to get involved. I thought two lovers were...
Words: 790 - Pages: 4
...Bystander Apathy Experiment Bystander Apathy Experiment (1968) On March 13, 1964, Kitty Genovese was attacked and stabbed by a man later identified as Winston Moseley. Despite Genovese’s cries for help, none of the people in the nearby apartment building who heard her cries called police to report the incident. The attack first began at 3:20 AM, but it was not until 3:50 AM that someone first contacted police. In 1968, John Darley and Bibb Latane became intrigued by the incident and decided to conduct an experiment which was given the name the Bystander Apathy Experiment. Their main goal was to figure out why people, in cases like Genovese’s, did not come for help. These two psychologists asked volunteers to participate in a discussion which was claimed to be extremely personal. Each individual was separated in different rooms and had to communicate with each other through an intercom. During this “extremely personal” conversation, one of the members would fake an epileptic seizure through the intercom. When the volunteer believed that he/she was the only other person in the discussion, 85% left the room and began to seek help for the individual with a fake seizure. Next, the two psychologists decided to see what would happen if three or four people were in this discussion, instead of just one; and just as they suspected, only 31% went to look for help once the seizure began. So what exactly is the bystander effect? Psychologists predict there are two major factors that...
Words: 341 - Pages: 2
...Everyday thousands of Americans simply don't have enough food to feed their family and their children. Most turn to government assistance, such as WIC and food stamps for support. However, not all needy families qualify and some may not receive enough food stamps. In that case, they turn to local food pantries for help with food. The donations they receive can truly make a difference. Out of the realm of typical behavior, I recently donated two turkeys to Our Daily Bread Food Pantry to be distributed to their client families for their own Thanksgiving celebrations. The volunteers were overwhelmed with the support received during this time when the economy is weak. They were tremendously grateful for the local generosity and asked that I "please keep giving." I'm a firm believer in doing helpful deeds. I'm a naturally kind and compassionate person, and I believe that every negative experience in one’s life can result in something positive. I would not consider my behavior to be prosocial for the reason that I had no motive for donating both turkeys to the local food pantry designed to help others. My behavior was altruistic. Why? My act was voluntarily to help needy families with no expectation of a reward in any form, except perhaps a feeling of having done a good deed. Prosocial behavior ranges over a continuum from the most selfless acts of altruism to helpful acts that are motivated entirely by self-interest (Taylor, Peplau, Sears, 2006). The fact that I was...
Words: 583 - Pages: 3
...Bystander Apathy and Effect Bystander Apathy or effect would be when someone around you is a situation but you don’t do anything to help then with the situation or aren’t doing anything to stop it, you are just standing there watching it happen. The number of bystanders is greater than the number of people who will actually step up and give help during the situation. The greater number of bystanders means the less likely people will get any help throughout a situation. Bystander effect or apathy means people will not help a victim even if the situation is bad, they will just allow it to happen to not get involved with the problem (Wikipidea Contributors). On Friday the 13 in March 1964 Catherine Genovese was arriving home from work when...
Words: 741 - Pages: 3
...Bystander Apathy Experiment (1968) On March 13, 1964, Kitty Genovese was attacked and stabbed by a man later identified as Winston Moseley. Despite Genovese’s cries for help, none of the people in the nearby apartment building who heard her cries called police to report the incident. The attack first began at 3:20 AM, but it was not until 3:50 AM that someone first contacted police. In 1968, John Darley and Bibb Latane became intrigued by the incident and decided to conduct an experiment which was given the name the Bystander Apathy Experiment. Their main goal was to figure out why people, in cases like Genovese’s, did not come for help. These two psychologists asked volunteers to participate in a discussion which was claimed to be extremely personal. Each individual was separated in different rooms and had to communicate with each other through an intercom. During this “extremely personal” conversation, one of the members would fake an epileptic seizure through the intercom. When the volunteer believed that he/she was the only other person in the discussion, 85% left the room and began to seek help for the individual with a fake seizure. Next, the two psychologists decided to see what would happen if three or four people were in this discussion, instead of just one; and just as they suspected, only 31% went to look for help once the seizure began. So what exactly is the bystander effect? Psychologists predict there are two major factors that contribute to the bystander...
Words: 859 - Pages: 4
...Group Inhibition of the Bystander Intervention in Emergencies Social psychologists, Latane and Darley (1968), performed a certain study to find out why people may resist giving help or why people fail to assist themselves or others in the presence of an emergency. They figure maybe there are factors that contribute to this problem and for that reason they formed an experiment. Before getting into their experiment, they considered a tragic event that took place in 1964, in New York City. A female named Kitty Genovese was walking down the street in her neighborhood, and a man walking towards her with a knife began to stab her. Kitty screamed for help and no one responded the first time. The second time she repeated screaming for help only one male responded. At this point the police dept. was still not notified. Kitty had been stabbed multiple times before someone finally decided to dial 911. There were a total of 38 bystanders/eyewitnesses that did not take action as said by the police investigative team. This raised a major question to everyone. Why would no one be of help in this type of emergency? Latane and Darley (1968) used this case as a background to their own experiment. Their main question of course, was simply why are there “bystanders”? In our minds we most likely think that the more eyewitnesses there are in a state of emergency someone will definitely dial 911 or reach out for some type of help. But that is not the case according to Latane and Darley. They...
Words: 1222 - Pages: 5
...Dissent and Altruism are a matter of personal conviction, but situational factors are also involved. Analyze five situational factors that are involved when a person decides to rock the boat and choose conscience over conformity. Dissent and Altruism is the inclination to assist others selflessly or take dangerous actions on behalf of others. (Wade & Tavris, 2008, p. 298) It is partly a sense of moral goodness of one’s own conduct, intentions or character together with a feeling of obligation to do what is right. Additionally, there are external or situational factors that can influence a person’s decision to state an unpopular opinion, choose conscience over conformity or assist a stranger in trouble. The decision by someone to act courageously can be influenced by multiple situational factors. Situational factors can influence both Altruism and dissent. Below, we examine five of those factors. 1. You become aware that there is a need to get involved or assist: Before someone can act without relying on something or someone else, they must be fully aware that their action is absolutely needed. Private Johnson Gideon Beharry, of the Princess of Wales Royal regiment, in 2004 acted courageously to save his fellow soldiers. He drove his armored vehicle with his hatch open, exposing his face and head to enemy gunfire. Beharry drove the crippled warrior through the ambush, taking his own crew and leading five other warriors to safety. He then extracted his wounded...
Words: 968 - Pages: 4
...the influence of Bystander Effect on pro social behaviour Introduction: Kitty Genovese, a New York City woman, was stabbed to death near her home on March 13, 1964 with her neighbors witness the whole thing happen but no one called the police. This common portrayal of her neighbors as being fully aware of what was transpiring but completely unresponsive. This went on to become a psychological paradigm and an stimulus on psychologist to investigating the effect of bystanders on individuals willing of helping others. Bystander Effect refers to the tendency for individuals to be less likely to help other person in need when other bystanders are present, or believed to be present, as compared to when they are alone (VCE psychology unit 1 and 2 textbook). And pro-social behaviour is any behaviour intended to help or benefit another person, group or society. One of the classic experiments is conducted by John Darley and Bibb Latané in 1964 called Bystander Apathy Experiment to investigate the influence group size displays the probability of reactions to the incident. The aim of the current study was to conduct a series of experiments to investigate the influence of Bystander Effect on pro social behaviour. The independent variable was the the number of people that present when the accident happens. The dependent variable was the likelihood of the witnesses to help. It was predicted that the the participant aged 15 to 30 from Facebook would more likely to help when they were...
Words: 996 - Pages: 4
