Free Essay

Causes of World War Ii

In: Historical Events

Submitted By algraus
Words 1795
Pages 8
Nationalism and WWII Germany
Alex Grausnick

Charles de Gaulle, the French general and statesman who led the Free French Forces during World War II, once said; “Patriotism is when love of your own people comes first; nationalism is when hate for people other than your own comes first.” After the German nation was first formed and nationalism began to grow in Germany in the late 19th centuryas, they could have no idea that it would come to be one of the focal points behind the world’s deadliest and most disturbing war almost 30 years later. Nationalism was an extremely strong and popular idea in the 1920s and 30s because Germany was simply looking for something to believe in after its defeat in WWI and the problems in the Treaty of Versailles. But how did the idea of nationalism come to be behind the Germans in WWII? There were countless reasons, but it mainly came down to one individual; a man named Adolf Hitler. The nationalist idea came about, at least in part, due to Hitler’s now infamous hate for the Jewish people that ended in the slaughtering of more than 6 million of them when he was in charge of the country, which became more important than the love of their own people, just as de Gaulle said. Let us begin with the one who exploited the nationalist German citizens the most during the 1930s; a man named Adolf Hitler. What movements did he represent? He became an extreme German nationalist and he despised the Austrian Empire which he thought was dominated by anti-German forces and was a paradise for Jews. The idea of nationalism was growing stronger and stronger as Hitler began to gain his power, and after 1918 and after the collapse of the monarchies, nationalism became a revolutionary force. In short, it was the end of the First World War, and the Germans had just lost in humiliating fashion. The German people claimed that their so-called German democracy was the reason why they lost the First World War and the embarrassment of the Treaty in Versailles, in which the Germans were required to pay millions in reparation payments. There also was the issue of all the weak policies that had been in place in Germany for decades before, which some felt led up to their crushing defeat. However, it was not only Hitler that embraced these nationalistic views, although he was the most infamous individual to do so. So what was the nationalism that Hitler supported and why was that such a better option than what had been in place in Germany for centuries? The nationalism that Hitler supported was a claim against the injustices of Versailles, which created such terrible conditions such as unemployment. As was stated earlier, the German people seemed to support this idea of nationalism while at the same time putting down their former system of democracy. German thinkers in the past had put down democracy as something that was completely un-German, while true German democracy was identified with Hitler's leader principle. But where did this idea of nationalism come from that replaced the seemingly non-German idea of democracy? There were social problems, the people’s community that the workers were now a part of, and the new leaders who preached this idea came from humble origins. Not only did Hitler exploit the nationalist feelings that were harboring in the German people, but some individuals blame what was being taught in the schools to the children of the generation that came to be under Hitler. The neglect of southern Germany in the schools teaching political studies is something that some hold at least partly responsible for an assumption that schools throughout Germany taught a uniform picture of history characterized by an aggressive nationalism. Also influencing some understandings of the history of the German education system have been exaggerated views of social control; individuals who supported this view claimed that the aim of schools was a manipulation in the interest of alleviating the power structure. And yet another view about the German political education system was that it instilled a German ideology, characterized by mystical anti-modernism, a romantic celebration of nature and rural life, and anti-Semitism. This view claimed that these schools that were dominated by this ideology formed the center and not the fringe of German education and because of this it had certain views that allowed it to anticipate the later educational program of National Socialism. The reason why these lessons in the German schools were so important in the late 19th and early 20th centuries was because these were the individuals who were going to vote for Hitler as he began his campaign in the 1930s to become the leader of the country and get them back to the economic and general positive vibes that they had felt before World War I and the depression in the 1920s. Whether or not what was taught in the German schools had a very large impact on the nationalist ideas is not perfectly clear, the idea was clearly more powerful than what was engrained in the citizens before the outbreak of World War I. But why were these nationalist ideas so popular with the German people compared to the ideas that had already been brewing in people for years? Radical nationalism was not a precise ideology, but instead a set of assumptions put together into a particular political style. Perhaps the most distinguishing characteristic of these radical nationalists was that they did not hesitate to judge the government or use the organizations as a device against the government rather than purely a force. The activists shared the desire to use nationalism as a unifying element between the two groups; unfortunately, however, they could not agree on how this could be applied in reality. The issue is that it was not completely clear who the radical nationalist diehards were in the scenario. A survey of the positions of responsibility in the German Defense League, for example, on a national and local level, confirms the presence of countless notables, and in many cases, they came from upper-middle class families with traditions of service, learning and prestige. Although they were not satisfied with the political practice that was established by the government, they still hoped to preserve the power of rank, privilege, and wealth; and what they sought from the patriotic societies was a popular mandate rather than populist influence. It is certainly possible that economic growth and social mobility combined to produce a greater number of notables than the number of places that were available for in the established networks of patrician politics. In short, the nationalists did not wish to take away the traditional system, but instead they wanted to adopt it to their own needs. This is the match that was the most important in the history of the country; the existence of nationalism along with the strong belief on an individual basis as well. But how did these two different ideologies work with each other when it seems as though they may not be the best pair? In the eighteenth century and beyond, nationalism coexisted with the sovereign individual and patriotism was thought to support the existence of the network of personal relationships. The speed of time and the emphasis upon respectability spiritualized the ideal of friendship, and certainly this made it easier for nationalism to claim dominance over personal relationships. These definitions were only a short step from Fichte's assertion, as he told the German nation in his speeches (1808) that true love is never fixed upon the merely transitory, but must rest in the eternal. Individualism was projected from each man on to the nation as a whole; just as the world was made up of nations, each with its own individuality that should be respected by all other nations and individuals. Every individual was equal, each had their own place in society, and people simply did not believe in the domination of one nation over others. However, how exactly did this idea of nationalism conform to the idea of war, especially in World War II? The concept war disease became an idea of war health; and the continual struggle in which some are accustomed to symbolize life, which is war against war – a negation of negation, has received in its own content that against which it fights? Unquestionably such an uproar of the intellect and imagination is to be traced to romanticism, strongly sensualist and materialistic, which was called decadence. Decadence ignored and wounded many delicate sentiments, and even soiled and corrupted many pure affections, contaminating them with libido and sadism. So, in conclusion, how did nationalism come about and why did it stick in certain individual’s minds during the 1930s leading up to World War II? Nationalism has been around for centuries, but very rarely has it been as intense as it was in certain individuals during the 1920s and 1930s in Germany. This was mainly due to one individual who would come to rule the country with an unprecedented hatred for the Jewish race in Europe; Adolf Hitler. Germany was in ruins after the First World War, and had struggled to regain its power both economically and as a nation of individuals who were looking for something to believe in. Adolf Hitler eliminated his competitors, and left the voters one choice for their new leader; himself. As the leader, his views rubbed off on some of the individuals who were following and supporting him; not only because they wanted to believe in him, but also because this is what they had been taught in school when they were younger. What they learned stuck with them throughout their lives, especially when their new leader had the same principles. One key piece of this idea of nationalism for the German people was that they were able to keep their belief in themselves as an individual also. The idea was that the nation was formed through individuals, and people can still believe in the individual as long as they still believed in the nation as a whole. The idea of nationalism went well with the idea of war, and when Hitler told the Germans that he could dig them out of this post-World War I hole, they ate it up. Little did they know that this nationalist idea would lead to the deadliest and most disgusting war the world has ever seen, and we have yet to see anything worse in the 70 years since. Nationalism was one, if not the main, cause behind the Germans entering World War II, and it led to absolute and total destruction. What else is new?

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Causes of World War Ii

...Causes of World War ll After World War l, the world was trying to recover from the harsh effects of the war. In the 1920’s, twenty years after World War 1, the world was able to maintain world peace within. Everyone had the mindset of avoiding another war at all costs. Then ironically, in the 1930’s, new threats to the world peace arose, and another war seemed to be inevitable. No actions taken to stop the war from happening proved to be effective. A convergence of events contributed to the beginning of World War 11; including the failure of the League of Nations, Hitler’s actions, and the declaration of war on Germany by Great Britain and France. The League of Nations proved to be ineffective, and failed to tale appropriate actions toward countries when problems arose. a. The League of Nations basically allowed Japan to take Manchuria and other parts of China from China i. Textbook p. 712 ( Japan blew up their own railroad and blamed China) ii. Textbook p. 712 (The League of Nations failed to thoroughly investigate, and Japan got away with little chastisement) iii. Textbook p.712 ( China lost Manchuria, Japan admitted to blowing up their own railroad, and the countries went to war with each other) iv. Textbook p. 712 (Japan occupied ¼ of China) b. The League of Nations didn’t take much action when Italy expanded to Ethiopia i. Textbook p. 712 ( only placed economic sanctions on Italy) ii. Textbook p. 712 (Mussolini still declared......

Words: 734 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Causes of World War Ii

...Justin Wilder HIS 323 Essay 1 Question 2 After The Great War it was clear Europe was in turmoil both economically and politically. In an effort to remedy the post war troubles the Allies drafted the Treaty of Versailles. The treaty itself was flawed due to the short time period it was drafted in and the opposing agendas of three main powers drafting it. The French premier, Georges Clemenceau saw this opportunity to protect France from any further conflict with Germany. David Lloyd George, the British Prime Minister, saw the need for a just and fair punishment for Germany but his main goal was to reestablish trade throughout Europe to ensure economic prosperity. The third main power was America. Woodrow Wilson’s goals were peace and self determination. His plan, The League Of Nations, was designed to unify Europe and prevent any future wars. As for his idea of self-determination Wilson thought that nations of multiple ethnic and religious groups should be able to choose their own political status without interference. French, British, and American leaders failed to create a strong and fair treaty after World War I. They failed to recognize each other’s interests and the interests of the rest of Europe. Despite troubling times in Europe, if they would have negotiated a stronger treaty, recognizing the interests of all European nations, strong and lasting democratic governments could have been established in Europe. German leaders signed the armistice on November 11,......

Words: 1305 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

To What Extent Was Hitler’s Foreign Policy the Main Cause of World War Ii

...To a certain extent, Hitler was to blame to the outbreak of World War II. The fact that he strongly believed he could reclaim the German losses under the Treaty of Versailles without any interference from the League of Nations, and the signing of the Nazi-Soviet Pact show that Hitler was determined, and wouldn’t settle for anything less than what he wanted. Hitler wasn’t the only one who was to be blamed for the second world war – the failures of the League of Nations and Treaty of Versailles, the practice of isolationism in countries such as the US, Britain and France, and appeasement were also to blame. The fact that Germany was limited to an extremely small army, 6 naval ships, and no air force, submarines or tanks at all was something that encouraged Hitler to build up an army, regardless of what the Treaty of Versailles stated. By 1936, the Germans had a total air force consisting of 5,116 planes, and were extremely close to overtaking the size of the British air force. This was eventually accomplished, as the Germans ended up with 5,606 planes in 1937. One of the main reasons for the outbreak of the war was that Hitler was certain he could regain everything that Germany lost as a result of the Treaty of Versailles. His certainty was appealing to the German people, as they felt they needed a strong leader who would provide them with ‘lebensraum’, or living space. With the growing amount of aircraft in possession of the Germans, Hitler, an extremely......

Words: 674 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay


...THE CAUSE OF WORLD WAR II PODER VANG HIS/125 CHRISTOPHER PRICE MARCH 15,2015 The cause of World War II have been said that there were many causes of the war but the one that was the most significant reason was the Great Depression (CHAPTER 24 World War II; HIST2, Volume 2, Kevin M. Schultz - © Cengage Learning; All rights reserved; Causes of War; pg. 407). During 1929 and 1932 the stock markets were collapsing which ended American investment in Europe. It caused the economic to slow down and without American dollar, Europe face industrial decline, unemployment, and widespread homelessness for workers. During all of these problems, it caused some political tension between France and Spain. Fights broke out between Communists and Nationalist over who had the best plan to the disrupted economy. With all the fight going on, the crash had a devastating effect on Germany who reparations payments for World War I, which were funded by the American lenders. Half way between 1929 and 1933, Germany had a withdraw from their invests, which caused Germany to have a production withdraw. Now during this time in the year of 1933, Adolf Hitler’s National Socialist Party gained power of Germany and took control of the whole state. Driven by delusions of grandeur and by racist and anti-Semitic ideologies, Hitler and Mussolini did not stopper their economic reform. Hitler even defied World War I’s Treaty of Versailles by occupying the industrialized Rhineland in 1936 and annexing......

Words: 615 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

World War Ii Through the 1970s

...late 1930s wanted to stay out of the European conflict that became World War II. 4. Explain the role that women played to help win World War II. 5. Describe at least two civil rights breakthroughs after World War II that moved the cause of African-Americans forward. 6. Describe at least two (2) ways in which the Vietnam War brought political awareness to a new generation of young Americans. 7. Describe at least two (2) programs of President Johnson’s “Great Society” agenda that are still with us today. 8. Include at least two (2) references other than the textbook. At least one (1) of your sources must be obtained from the collection of databases accessible from the Learning Resources Center Web page. Generic encyclopedic Internet resources such as Wikipedia or will not be considered acceptable. Your assignment must:  Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.  Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length. The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:  Recognize the major turning points in American history since the Civil War.  Analyze how historical events shape America’s current......

Words: 1534 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Was The Treaty Of Versailles Responsible For World War II?

...Was the Treaty of Versailles Responsible for World War II? I don't think that the Treaty of Versailles was responsible for World War II. The treaty did cause some disruptions, but I don't think that it was the singular cause of the war. It left Germany with nothing, and Hitler promised the Germans that everything would get better. The treaty definitely lead to a rise in fascism, and I think that allowed Hitler to start “rebuilding” Germany. There were a lot of flaws, and not everyone was happy with the treaty, but the ideal was to bring peace to the countries. It was hard to satisfy everyone, so the Treaty of Versailles was made to at least stop the fighting. Germany was treated unfairly and was blamed for the war, but the treaty didn’t cause...

Words: 362 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

How Did Benito Mussolini Support Fascism

...was very significant in the cause of World War II, Mussolini, the Abyssinia crisis, Spanish civil war, and its influence on Nazism aided Fascism in causing World War II. Fascism did not start from nothing. Benito Mussolini...

Words: 1133 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

A Philosophical Perspective of World Wars dissect creation and find some sort of semblance of meaning that might justify our existence. The list of our accomplishments is immeasurably vast. However, man might have proved that he can reach for ideals, but he has not proved that he can maintain them. We may have climbed mountains, but we have not been able to live for long in such high places. Despite our accomplishments, humanity’s failings have been just as extensive. Our history is also scarred with a long list of wars, injustices, unnecessary deaths, prejudices, hatreds, and disappointments. The pinnacle of our shortcomings, the end-point to our intellectual development as a species, can best be understood in the context of our World Wars. Although humanity has always lived side-by-side with war, never before in our history has so much widespread violence destroyed so many idyllic hopes and dreams. Never before was there such an example of our ignorance as a species, and blatant disregard for our intellectual successes. Both World Wars demonstrate...

Words: 2315 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

World War Ii Ressearch Report

...World War II Research Report The Soviet Union Danny Buck History 114 Dr. Murphy November 24, 2014 World War II Research Report The Soviet Union Totalitarianism came about in Russia during the time of Stalin. Before doing research I had thought that it would have started with Lenin, but it did not. “Why did Russia, in its enlarged incarnation as the Soviet Union under Stalin, become one of the three most repressive and brutal totalitarian states of the 20th century (the other two being Nazi Germany and China under Mao)? The urge to modernize rapidly is often put forward to explain the character of the Soviet Union. But what equally needs to be explained is the very backwardness that created such an urge. And the Russian intelligentsia had long been preoccupied both with modernization and resistance to it.” (Hollander, 2006). It was a brutal way of life where the people existed to serve the state. The Rise of Totalitarianism In the late 1910’s the czar was over thrown and he and his family were murdered. Lenin came to power and communism took over the country, but it was not totally repressive until Stalin came into power. Stalin’s goal was to modernize the Soviet Union. He wanted to industrialize the Soviet Union and increase the production of products. He thought that if he could make the Soviet Union a manufacturing giant that it could be a super power. He also wanted to maintain complete and absolute control and to not allow any interference from......

Words: 3575 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Ww2 Cause And Effect Essay

...There are a lot of causes and ways World War II got started. A lot of tension and turmoil from World War I and also from Hitler is what really led up to the world having its second world war. Some causes of the war is Hitler not going by the orders of other countries. Another is the Great Depression that was around the world and led to a bunch of turmoil and bad blood and led up the second World War. One big cause that led up to WWII was the turmoil left behind from WWI. According to the article “The causes of World War II” on there was an economic collapse and Germany started getting a strong military and disobeying the Treaty of Versailles. Germany was not happy and felt they were being treated harsh and unfair because of...

Words: 836 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

War of the World

...Wars of the World World War I began in 1914 after the assassination of the Archduke Francis Ferdinand the heir to the Austrian throne. The war was fought by the Allies (Great Britain, France, Russia, Italy, Japan and the United States in 1917) and the Central Powers (Austria-Hungary, Germany, and the Ottoman Empire). Although, the assassination of the heir to the throne might have triggered the war the state of the countries had been moving towards a war for a long time. There were many causes to World War I two of them were nationalism and militarism. A patriotic feeling is what nationalism is all about. This was one of the major causes of World War I. Not all of the ethnic groups had their goals realized in their state. Some wanted to have their own national state but could not achieve this goal. Some rivalries over colonies made the alliances of Europe’s great powers uneasy and added tension to the states. After Napoleon’s exile the Congress of Vienna tried to sort out problems in Europe. A new Europe was decided by delegates from Britain, Austria, Prussia and Russia that left Germany and Italy as divided states. Some strong nationalism elements led to the unification of Germany and Italy. France was angry at the settlement of the Franco-Prussian war as they lost Alsace-Loraine to Germany. Another major cause of World War I was militarism. After 1900, the growth of many armies made tensions worse. Many of the armies had doubled in size in a few...

Words: 725 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

World War Iii

...POST CONFLICTS – WORLD WAR III HOW WORLD WAR III BECAME POSSIBLE World War III (WWIII, WW3 or the Third World War) is a hypothetical worldwide military conflict following World War II. Because of the development and use of nuclear weapons near the end of World War II and their subsequent acquisition and deployment by several countries, it is feared that a third world war could cause massive global destruction and could even cause the end of human civilization and most or all human life on Earth. Another major concern is that biological warfare could cause a very large number of casualties, either intentionally or inadvertently by an accidental release of a biological agent or the unexpected mutation of an agent or its adaptation to other species after use. One of the first imagined scenarios, hypothesized shortly after or even during World War II, is a nuclear war between the United States and the Soviet Union, which emerged as superpowers following World War II. This has been widely used as a premise or plot device in books, films, television productions, and video games. However, a few writers have applied the term instead to the Cold War, arguing that it met the definition of a world war even though there was no direct armed conflict between the superpowers. World War I (1914–18) was regarded at the time as the "war to end all wars" as it was believed there could never be another global conflict of such magnitude. World War II (1939–45) proved that to be false, and with......

Words: 799 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Total War

...Total war refers to war that affects all aspects of society, not just the people involved. World War I and World War II are often recognized as “total wars” because both birthed a new era of warfare. In previous eras, wars only affected the armies involved and had no impact of the lives of people outside the war. With respect to World War I and II, everyone was involved and everybody provided as much help as possible to ensure the victory of their country. Gender nor race, skilled or unskilled, young or old everyone gathered together to fight as one. World War I was fought mainly in Europe from the year 1914 to the year 1918 and lasted 4 years. World War I was fought between the Allied Powers composed of France, Britain, Russia, Japan, Italy, and the United States. The Central Powers was composed of Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, and Turkey. What ignited World War I among other things, was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Soon to follow, Austria-Hungary invaded their enemies and created one of the most brutal wars in the world. It eventually ended with the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 where Germany took full blame for the war. What categorizes World War I as a total war is the effects it had on people outside the battlefield. In order to compensate for the poor economy, many government agencies were created in order to conserve and generate revenue during the war. Specifically, one of the major agencies was known as the War Industries Board, or the WIB.......

Words: 943 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

His135 Week 8 Essay

...Causes for American Involvement in World War II \\ HIS/125 February 13, 2015 \\ The causes for US involvement might on the surface seem like a simple response to the brutal sneak attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese. Though that event was indeed the catalyst, in fact the seeds of World War II had been planted just a few years following World War I. The battle lines were already drawn, with Germany, Austria-Hungary on one side, and Russia, France, Britain and the US on the other. It was particularly hard for Germany after the Treaty of Versailles was signed. The treaty exacted stiff penalties against Germany such as: admission of guilt for causing the war, paying some 6600 million pd sterling as well as loss of all of its colonial possessions. What was likely most disturbing for Germany was that the treaty placed restrictive limits on German militarization. (, 2012) Additionally, the worldwide depression was particularly hard on the German public, and was one of the major causes of World War II. In the early years of the United States, it was easy to remain out of European wars. Crossing the distance of vast expanses of oceans made remaining neutral a much easier prospect. Moving forward, because the United States was focused on its own domestic economic troubles with the continuation of the Great Depression, it sought to take an isolationist stance, preferring to remain neutral and out of conflicts in Europe. Yet, in 1931, President......

Words: 753 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay


...How does Ted G. Goertzel claim C.W Mills’ s The Cause of World War III C. Wright Mills, who was a famous sociologist of America, claimed that a new world war is coming up and the cause of World War III is the military industrial complex. He states his opinion about new world war detailedly in his book The cause of World War III. In addition, we can know more about Mills’ s opinion about how does he regard the military industrial complex and the power elites. The Ted G. Goertzel clamed that Mills’ s opinion about new world war was wrong in his article The Cause of World War III, Thirty Years Later. However, Mills’ s opinion about new world war is partly right and partly wrong. It will be some local wars caused by the military industrial complex. But the nuclear wars will never happen between. Charles Wright Mills was born in 1916 and died in 1962. He was one of the famous sociologist at that time. Also, as a sociology professor at Columbia University, some of his works are remaining until nowadays, such as The Power Elite; White Collar; The Sociological Imagination. The Power Elite is about the class alliances in the U.S. Military; economy elite and political. The White Collar is an introduction of middle class in the U.S. He proposed the proper relationship in sociological scholarship between biography and history in the book named The Sociological Imagination. And this book was considered as the most influential book of Mills. He was so influential that......

Words: 1649 - Pages: 7