Free Essay

China-Taiwan Relations

In: Social Issues

Submitted By zhoukath
Words 2631
Pages 11
China-Taiwan Cross-Strait Relations: A General Overview

The topic of Taiwan’s independence has been a decidedly sensitive subject for both those who are from either implicated party and outside nations alike, since the defeat of Kuomingtang (KMT) by the Communist Party in 1949. After so many decades of debate and political conflict, there has yet to be a concrete solution – the Taiwanese increasingly identify themselves as citizens of an independent nation, while the majority of the world has yet to recognize them officially as a nation separate from the PRC. Both parties involved – the PRC and Taiwan – have taken incredibly stubborn stances on this issue for the past several years, and it does not look like there will be an easy solution in the near future. China-Taiwan cross-strait relations are quite complicated, but for the sake of simplicity, it can be broken down into the period following the Japanese control over Taiwan, the defeat of the KMT, the period between the rise of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and contemporary times, and finally, the rest of the world’s – namely the US’ – involvement in the entire matter. Prior to 1949, China’s governing group was the KMT – a nationalist party, as they call themselves. For 50 years, the Japanese controlled Taiwan – though arguably, they did more good than bad, as Taiwan developed much quicker than mainland China through their help – but was forced to relinquish its hold in 1945, when the Axis Powers were defeated. In October of 1945, the US – on behalf of the Allied Forces – handed temporary control over Taiwan to the KMT. However, though the Taiwanese were initially grateful for their return to Chinese control, this quickly changed as they “became resentful of what they perceived as a high handed and frequently corrupt KMT authorities inclined to the arbitrary seizure of private property and economic mismanagement.”[1] This resentment eventually blew up into a rebellion that lasted for days in 1947, which ultimately lead to the infamous 228 Incident on February 28th, 1947. The KMT violently suppressed said rebellion, and an estimated 10,000 to 30,000 people died. Following this, the period of White Terror ensued until July 15, 1987, where thousands of Taiwanese scholars and intellectuals were imprisoned and some, even executed – the KMT feared that such people would lead rebellions against their rule. This – particularly the 228 incident – proved to be huge factors in the Taiwanese independence movement. This incident provides a strong legitimizing for the Taiwanese call for independence – it emphasizes the strife that Taiwan went through under the KMT rule. And of course, the event in itself is a great tragedy – despite its rather euphemistic name, it can essentially be labelled as a massacre. However, there may be justification for the other side of the argument, as outrageous as it may seem. For any – or at least, most – leaders, the choice to suppress a rebellion would be an incredibly difficult decision to make. However, at that point in time, the government in Taiwan was weak and disorganized, as all that was left was the remains of the Japanese colonization of Taiwan. As an argument for the KMT, creating a strong and stable government for Taiwan was a pressing matter, and suppressing the rebellions was essential to this ultimate goal for the good of the country. Of course, this doesn’t justify the means, nor the many deaths of innocent Taiwanese, but at least it may shed some light on exactly why the KMT might even go such lengths to prevent the rebellions. Back in 1949, the KMT was defeated by the Communist Party of China during the Chinese Civil War and were thus essentially chased out of Beijing and into the province of Taiwan, where they stayed up until now, initially hoping to one day claim Beijing back, and to rule a unified China and Taiwan. Even today, they continue to – to a certain extent – believe that they have the right to govern both the PRC and the Republic of China (Taiwan). The KMT did not support Taiwanese independence – rather, they have always viewed China and Taiwan as a part of “One China.” However, when in 2000 the Democratic Progressive Party was elected in, Taiwan took a decidedly more independence-oriented stance. Despite Chen Shui-bian, the elected leader of the DPP, being extremely corrupt by all standards, the DPP did help provide the framework through which Taiwanese independence takes a huge priority above the concept of “One China.” However, the PRC sets forth several arguments to counter the movement and even the legitimacy of the KMT itself. The Communist Party of China (CCP) argues that as the KMT’s successor as the government of China, it has the right to rule Taiwan as well, under “the succession of states theory.”[2] The Taiwanese, however, argue that this point is invalid, as Taiwan existed as a state past the establishment of the CCP’s power in China. They claim to meet all the criteria in Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention of statehood – “a permanent population, a defined territory, [a] government, and [the] capacity to enter into relations with other states”[3] – though China would counter this, arguing that they do not meet the fourth criterion – the capacity to enter into relations with other states. Taiwan is really only recognized as an independent country by some 20 nations from the UN, and is “denied access to international organizations such as the UN.”[4] Another major argument Taiwan sets out is that despite the nationalist rule of the KMT over her, many Taiwanese believe that the KMT is the government of China, and since Taiwan is not a part of China, the KMT should have no say over the Taiwanese population. The advocates of reunification within Taiwan argue however, that legally, the Chinese Civil War never ended officially. As such, this political separation between the two is only temporary, and once the entire issue has been sorted out, the only natural ending would be the reunification of China and Taiwan into one large state. The KMT’s claim to have the right of power over both mainland China and Taiwan – outdated or not – is not representative of the general Taiwanese perspective, whether that is independence or the less popular option of reunification. The KMT eventually lost power in Taiwan to the Democratic Progressive Party, and when they came back to the stage, “President Chen Shui-bian and his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had engaged in policy that widely departed from the KMT, invigorating efforts to seek Taiwan’s sovereignty.”[5] The policies that the DPP engaged only promoted such mentalities among the Taiwanese citizens, who increasingly demanded independence from China, and even perceived themselves as already an independent nation. The idea of “One Country, Two Systems” as proposed by Deng Xiaoping that was implemented for Hong Kong and Macau was largely rejected by the Taiwanese, even the ones vying for reunification with the PRC, for various reasons. A number of alternatives were suggested – “One Country, Two Governments,” “One Country, Two Systems,” only under the control of the ROC rather than the PRC – were all rejected by the PRC. Currently, Taiwan is the official platform for the KMT, as the DPP were ultimately voted off by a landslide (though, arguably, it was a sign of rebellion against the lack of performance from the DPP, particularly regarding the extreme corruption of Chen Shui-bian rather than a preference for the KMT itself) and the KMT regained its footing as the governing body of the ROC in 2008. The relationship between China and Taiwan has calmed somewhat during recent years, as President Ma Ying-Jiu of Taiwan has called a diplomatic truce with China. Taiwan and China have agreed more or less to simply deal with the simple matters first, and to leave the difficult question of Taiwan’s sovereignty to a later date. The Taiwanese and Chinese governments are pushing mostly for stronger relations, through new implementations such as “direct flights, trade, investment, and movement.”[6] At this rate, Taiwan seems to be more or less simply maintaining the status quo; though there has been no official say as to whether Taiwan is an independent state or not, it holds good ties with a healthy majority of the world’s nations, including China itself, and is recognized as a sovereign state by more than twenty. At this point in time, it is rather difficult to judge where exactly the rest of the international community stands in this matter. Many can argue that the outside world, though not definitely not through official terms, and more so through the common people themselves, seem to more or less support the Taiwanese in this. This seems to be demonstrated through both the media and their economic ties with Taiwan. Though the US does not officially recognize Taiwan as an independent country – in fact, they signed and issued the Shanghai Communiqué, in which “‘the Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China,”[7] – they continue to trade with Taiwan; in particular, the US sold large amount of weapons to Taiwan. In three years, “$4.1 billion of Taiwan’s arms purchases were procured from the United States.”[8] It is true, however, that while the US supports trading with Taiwan in this sense, they have withheld trading some of the weapons that Taiwan requires the most. This is similarly the case between Taiwan and several other countries, though definitely not to the same extent; “only 28 countries against 160 have given their support to Taiwan’s freedom,”[9] but many more continue trade and unofficial diplomatic ties with her. If these ties were to be analyzed deeper, however, it may be noted that nations only hold such economic ties with either the PRC or the Republic of China (Taiwan); the Chinese may argue that it is impossible to have this situation in any other way, as the PRC and the ROC are part of one united state, and as such, trade can only be maintained in one link. The ties between said nations are not so easily analyzed, however. The US, for example, during George Bush’s time in office, did refuse to sell to Taiwan the weapons they required the most. They refuse as well to recognize Taiwan as an independent state; in fact, they even state that “the United States does not support Taiwan independence,” but rather, “insists on the peaceful resolution of cross-Strait difference and encourages dialogue to help advance such an outcome.” As they maintain strong but unofficial ties to Taiwan, the United States is definitely taking a bit of a back-seat on this issue; there is much to be lost and too much of a risk to support the more democratic Taiwan in its endeavours, as the United States’ economy depends highly on China, and vice versa. The future of Taiwan is a question that is decidedly difficult to answer. The relationship between the PRC and the ROC seem to be easing into one of less tension, and more than anything else, the KMT appears to be quite comfortable maintaining the status quo without pushing for independence, or even their initial viewpoint of their right to control both states as one united state. The US, too, pushes for a peaceful resolution, and refuses to take much more of an active stance. However, many people believe that China may follow through with its threats of violence towards Taiwan, and fear that demanding independence may ultimately lead to warfare, and inevitably, the military decimation of Taiwan, as China’s nuclear power is much more extensive. Many, however, doubt the legitimacy of China’s threats; what is to be gained through such a display of military power? The incorporation of Taiwan is much in China’s interest, and attempting to raze it to the ground is only a waste in resources, support, and one’s own (arguably) people. I am of the opinion that this issue will be solved in a more peaceful fashion; nothing is to be gained in the other option for either party, and even now, China appears to be integrating more and more into a more diplomatic stance. However, the question of whether Taiwan really will take on Taiwan as its official name, or whether it will remain the Republic of China, and whether it will become an independent state, is a question that I feel cannot be answered at this point in time. Neither party appears to want to budge in its stance, despite the compromise of “One Country, Two Systems” that was proposed, as it was largely shot down, and the world itself is at a stalemate. It has become largely a question of whether the nation in question values its economic ties and prosperity more, or whether it values supporting the democracy of Taiwan and its cause over the possibility of becoming a target of the PRC’s anger. The easing ties between China and Taiwan do nothing to answer the question, either; the respective leaders for each have more or less put off the question for later, both reluctant to be the cause of the ultimate solution. This problem has lasted many decades since the 1940s, and will, in my opinion, last at least several years longer, as no easy solution seems to have presented itself. Hopefully, the peaceful relations of today will last throughout this duration until a solution has finally settled.

References
“228 Incident,” Wikipedia, accessed March 27th, 2013, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/228_Incident

“China-Taiwan Relations,” Council on Foreign Relations, accessed March 23rd, 2013, http://www.cfr.org/china/china-taiwan-relations/p9223

“Ma’s Unpopularity Cannot Help DPP,” Taipei Times, accessed March 28th, 2013, http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2013/03/11/2003556777

“Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States,” Council on Foreign Relations, accessed March 28th, 2013, http://www.cfr.org/sovereignty/montevideo-convention-rights-duties-states/p15897

“Political Status of Taiwan,” Wikipedia, accessed March 27th, 2013, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_status_of_Taiwan

“The Taiwan Question in China-U.S. Relations,” Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, accessed March 26th, 2013, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/topics/3713/3715/t19064.htm

"U.S. Relations With Taiwan." U.S. Department of State, accessed March 28th, 2013, http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/35855.htm

“When did Taiwan become Independent of China?” Taiwan Attractions, accessed March 27th, 2013, http://taiwan-attractions.com/files/when_did_taiwan_become_independent_of_china.htm

CHU, Yun-han. (2004) Taiwan's National Identity Politics and the Prospect of Cross-Strait Relations, University of California Press
-----------------------
[1] “228 Incident,” Wikipedia, accessed March 27th, 2013, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/228_Incident

[2] “Political Status of Taiwan,” Wikipedia, accessed March 27th, 2013, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_status_of_Taiwan

[3] “Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States,” Council on Foreign Relations, accessed March 28th, 2013, http://www.cfr.org/sovereignty/montevideo-convention-rights-duties-states/p15897

[4] “Political Status of Taiwan,” Wikipedia, accessed March 27th, 2013, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_status_of_Taiwan

[5] “China-Taiwan Relations,” Council on Foreign Relations, accessed March 23rd, 2013, http://www.cfr.org/china/china-taiwan-relations/p9223

[6] “Ma’s Unpopularity Cannot Help DPP,” Taipei Times, accessed March 28th, 2013, http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2013/03/11/2003556777

[7] “The Taiwan Question in China-U.S. Relations,” Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, accessed March 26th, 2013, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/topics/3713/3715/t19064.htm

[8] “China-Taiwan Relations,” Council on Foreign Relations, accessed March 23rd, 2013, http://www.cfr.org/china/china-taiwan-relations/p9223

[9] “When did Taiwan become Independent of China?” Taiwan Attractions, accessed March 27th, 2013, http://taiwan-attractions.com/files/when_did_taiwan_become_independent_of_china.htm

Similar Documents

Free Essay

China

...China’s Peaceful Rise to Dominance The current state of the globe has seen many changes in the past few decades. The global political structures have shifted and turned to provide a new landscape where substantial evolution has and will continue to occur. The purpose of this essay is to argue and prove that China will rise to power in a peaceful manner throughout the 21st century. This paper will first explain the current situation, which has left China in position to become a global leader as the new century unfolds. The essay will also examine military, economic and social issues that may positively contribute to this change and lead this Asian country to a new significant posture within the geo-political realm of international relations. The Rise of China towards the 21st Century Technology and communication improvements have changed the world for good. With new developments in these areas, the world has become much smaller and navigable in many ways when discussing China and their current rise to global prominence in recent times. The end of the Cold War which saw a bipolar world develop into a unipolar world has created opportunity for other powerful nations to step in and play a key role in global events that are unfolding. China’s massive population and natural resources have continued to organize and be directed towards more powerful means. Chinese leaders have seen this coming for years as the country began opening up to global interests in the 1970’s. As America’s...

Words: 1363 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Taiwan in Us Policy

...Taiwan in US Policy Clare Fan Taiwan Relations Act Speaking of Taiwan in U.S. policy, the most important thing will be "Taiwan Relations Act." "Taiwan Relations Act" has been in effect for 33 years. United States established formal diplomatic relations with China. 10. "Taiwan Relations Act" is to regulate the Taiwan-US bilateral "non-diplomatic relations”, and is an important legal basis for the U.S. executive and legislative departments to handle Taiwan affairs. than international treaties. As a United States domestic law, it rank higher It authorizes the U.S. government to continue the In 1979, the In order to reduce the act’s impact on Taiwan, U.S. signed "Taiwan Relations Act" in the same year on April communication on economic, social and cultural aspects among the American people and the people of Taiwan. It also affirms that it is the U.S.’ important goal to protect and promote the human rights of the people of Taiwan. In the "Taiwan Relations Act" Section II, subsection 1 states that, the main purposes of the formulation of the Act is “to help maintain peace, security, and stability in the Western Pacific; and to promote the foreign policy of the United States by authorizing the continuation of commercial, cultural, and other relations between the people of the United States and the people on Taiwan.” After more than 30 years, most of these goals have been achieved. The law has played a very important role in maintaining the security of the Western Pacific....

Words: 2233 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

China vs Taiwan

...INDEPENDENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA, TAIWAN POLICY CONSDERATION History of the Republic of China, past and present In December 1978, the representative of China in the United Nations, the Republic of China, Taiwan was asked to leave the UN. Taiwan had to give up its seat in the UN Security Council as a permanent member and in the UN General Assembly. This is due to the US’s recognition of communist China, the Peoples’ Republic of China. Ever since 1949, both Chinas, have claimed be the legal government of China. Until 1992, both states were in a state of war ever since the nationalists Kuomintang were exiled to Taiwan. Since then, the US has pledged the security of Taiwan in the event of a communist China invasion by the People’s Liberation Army. As a result of this, the PRC has refrained from invading Taiwan because of US involvement. What this policy paper will address is the potential conflict that will occur if Taiwan declares itself as an independent state. The Republic of China, Taiwan is situated on an island called Formosa. It was settled by the Chinese in the 17th Century and saw early colonial rule of the Dutch between 1620 to 1662, when it reverted back to Imperial Chinese rule. Between 1845 and 1945, the island of Formosa also saw Imperial Japanese rule. At the end of World War Two in 1945, the nationalist Kuomintang or KMT was facing a civil war with the Chinese Communist Party or CCP for the control of Mainland China. By 1949, the KMT was defeated...

Words: 3004 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

China Taiwan

...China and Taiwan, while in practice maintaining a fragile "status quo" relationship, periodically grow impatient with the diplomatic patchwork that has kept the island separate from the Communist mainland since 1949.  After losing the civil war to Communist Chinese and fleeing to Taiwan in 1949, the nationalist Kuomintang (KMT) leaders of the Republic of China regarded the Communist Chinese government as illegitimate, claiming the mainland as rightfully their own. Beijing, in turn, regards Taiwan as a renegade province, and has tried repeatedly to persuade the island to negotiate a return to the fold. The KMT returned to power in 2008 after being in opposition for eight years. During this time President Chen Shui-bian and his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had engaged in policy that widely departed from the KMT, invigorating efforts to seek Taiwan's sovereignty. Current President Ma Ying-jeou takes a decidedly more conciliatory approach; shortly after taking office he declared a "diplomatic truce" with China. Since then, Taiwan's relations with the mainland have improved. Share 91 6 ------------------------------------------------- “One China” Principle The two sides sharply disagree on Taiwan's de jure political status. The People's Republic of China asserts that there is only "One China" and Taiwan is an inalienable part of it. Beijing says Taiwan is bound by the consensus reached in 1992 between the representatives of both governments in Hong Kong. Referred to as...

Words: 1702 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Does Taiwan Qualify as a State Under International Law? Apply the Factual Criteria to This and Elaborate on the Role of Recognition by Other States. What Does This Case Study Contribute to the Debate Around the Nature of International Law?

...International Law Does Taiwan qualify as a state under International law? Apply the factual criteria to this and elaborate on the role of recognition by other states. What does this case study contribute to the debate around the nature of International law? ------------------------------------------------- Lecturer: Natalie ------------------------------------------------- Author: Rofhiwa Ramahala ------------------------------------------------- Tutorial Group: 4 ------------------------------------------------- Due Date: 7th March 2016 Introduction Two separate statements made by two high profiled Chinese government officials in 1999 threw the question of Taiwan sovereignty into question. The first statement originated from then President of the government of the Republic of China (or “ROC”) Lee Teng-hui on Taiwan on July 10, 1999 during an interview with a reporter. In the interview he stated that the relationship between China and Taiwan is one of a “special state-to-state relationship”. While in the second statement a spokesperson of the People’s Republic of China (or “PRC”) after a severe earthquake struck Taiwan. The United Nation office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs attempted to send a disaster management team to Taiwan, however then Secretary General Kofi Annan was informed that the U.N. had to ask the government of the PRC for permission to dispatch an aid team to Taiwan. Mr. Annan thus coined the statement of “the Taiwan Province of China”. These two statements...

Words: 3345 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Tiawian

...HST 360 4/23/15 Is Taiwan an Independent Nation? The relations between China and Taiwan have been anything but smooth. They have a fragile relationship and are in a constant state of wariness, ready to take action if anything were to break the fragile peace. The island of Taiwan has maintained its independence from the mainland since 1949, although the state of Taiwan's independence is a matter of huge debate. It may be difficult to understand the significance of Taiwan at first glance, but Taiwan is important to China for a number of interesting strategic and ideological reasons. Both of these countries have been through a lot and continue to go through many relations and foreign policies as the years go by. What now is called Taiwan started out as the Republic of China in the mainland of China after the fall of the Qing Dynasty in 1912. After many years of wars, two with Japan, Chiang Kai-shek established a stable form of government. This state considered itself to be the continuing sole legitimate ruler of all of China, referring to the communist government or "regime" as illegitimate, a so-called "Peoples' Republic of China" declared in Beijing by Mao Tse Tung. The Republic of China was supported for many years by many nations especially with the support of the United States who established a 1954 Mutual Defense treaty. Within a few years the People’s Republic of China was able to take more and more control of the government in China. Eventually the Communist...

Words: 705 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Rise and Risk of China

...The Rise and Risk of China Introduction Australia has felt the full impact of Chinas “extraordinary economic growth and active diplomacy” (Ikenberry 2011, 23) in East Asia. The power transition of China “becoming a formidable global power” (Ikenberry 2011, 26) is of growing importance to Australia’s economic prosperity and security (Shen 2009, 110). But as relative power begins to shift, the latest defence White Paper released last Friday May 3, stated “the relationship between the United States and China, the region’s and the globe’s two most powerful states, will more than any other single factor determine our strategic environment over coming decades” (Probyn and Wright 2013). Drawing upon the Research Thesis of Yi Shen at the University of NSW, the aim of this essay is to examine the repercussions of the US-China strategic rivalry over Taiwan. In the event of conflict, Australia would be forced to side with the US which “has kept Asia peaceful and Australia secure for many decades” (White 2011, 81). Maintaining a military alliance with the US as well as ongoing economic opportunities with China requires stable relations amongst Asian powers by adopting “the logic of concert” (White 2011, 90). As China becomes an ongoing threat to US primacy in Asia, it is in the best interest of Australia to maintain dual relations by the establishment of a new order that ensures regional stability and security throughout Asia. Clash over Taiwan Australia’s ability to maintain...

Words: 1673 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

China and Australia

...world community come into focus in China. Many believe China’s introduction to the world stage commenced in 1972, when it replaced Taiwan as representative in the United Nations. Furthermore when Deng came into Power in 1980 and ended the Cultural Revolution, China was freed from its economic reforms. China’s leaders became convinced that large amounts of capital could be acquired from abroad to speed up the country’s modernization, a change in attitude that elicited an almost frenetic response from foreign bankers and entrepreneurs. Since then China has become a member of the United Nations Security Council, admission to the World Trade organization in 2001; selected to host the 2008 Summer Olympic Games and in 2010 staged a successful Expo Shanghai, which was China’s world exposition that showcased the most technologically advanced metropolises. These were all considered significant steps in Chinas further integration into the global community. Since then Hong Kong and Taiwan have become China’s biggest partners in investment and trade. However Japan, the Unites States, Western Europe, Singapore and Australia have also joined the bandwagon with sizable partnerships with China. The main inhibitor in China’s efforts to participate in the world community is its dispute with Taiwan. Countries establishing diplomatic relations with China are forced to end relations with Taiwan. Since America pledged its support to Taiwan against attack from China in 1950 contentions have run high...

Words: 1554 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Us China Relationship

...GNlu | US-CHINA RELATIONS | SUBMITTED TO:Dr.Aruna Kumar Malik | | SUBMITTED BY :ABHISHEK CHATTERJEE | REG NO :11A006 INDEX Introduction Pg 2 US China Comparison Pg 3 Brief History Of US-China Relations Pg 5 Conclusion Pg 21 INTRODUCTION Since the dawn of civilization there have been great nations, 5000 years back the Mesopotamian,Egyptian and Indus Valley Civilization were the super-powers,if not the only advanced civilization of their time,2000 years back we had the roman empire and the chineese,500 years back the mughal empire,the ottoman empire etc. The world order keeps on changing, the end of the first world war saw the rise of America along the ranks of other European superpowers like the British Empire,France and Germany and saw the fall of 2 superpowers,the ottoman and the Austria-hungry empire. The second world war ushered the modern world into a new world order. The United Nations was born and its membership suddenly grew. The United States brought about reconstruction of the war torn economies of Europe and Japan and ensured stable democracies for her new allies...

Words: 8393 - Pages: 34

Free Essay

Leadership, Multiagency and Parent Partnership in Provision of Early Childhood Education and Care

...China’s Relations with Africa and West Name Name of Institution Tutor Date China’s Relations with Africa and West Introduction The international relations between China and countries of the West and Africa have enjoyed a long standing relationship though at different levels. Since the emergence of the People’s Republic of China, China-West and China-Africa relations have advanced continuously, as shall be demonstrated herein by the deepening relations in economic, political and cultural realms. These relations have created a new form of strategic partnerships founded on political equality, economic win-win relations, mutual trust and social-cultural exchanges. Over the last 60 years or so, China-West and China-Africa co-operations, have been based on the principles of equality, sincerity, mutual benefit and international relations development. Particularly, in Africa the co-operations have demonstrated reverence to the will of African countries, deepened relations between African and Chinese businesses and indicated a higher level of sincerity in helping African countries in their development agendas. However, this may not be the case with co-operations between China and the West due to different interest between the two entities, apparently, different from those that are experienced in Africa. Notwithstanding these different interests, a common feature on trade and economic relations have reached remarkable results and the overall effect has enabled growth in business...

Words: 2616 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Rapprochement And Normalization: United States During The 1960's

...• Only one country had the power to handle Russia and that was the United States o The US was weakened by the Vietnam war, withdrawing troops from Asia and was stopping Chinese containment • The death of Mao lead to a power struggle inside of China • China wanted to work with the United states to stop the expanding Soviet power • China pressured California governor Ronald Reagan to back away from restoring relations with Taiwan as he ran for...

Words: 1151 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Rich

...rIssues & Studie s© 45, no. 4 (December 2009): 159-188. Status for Sale: Taiwan and the Competition for Diplomatic Recognition TIMOTHY S. RICH Diplomatic recognition is generally seen as fundamental to the modern state system. The traditional views of recognition however focus almost exclusively on political or ideological rationales, ignoring other foundations on which other countries base establishing diplomatic recognition. Focusing on the Republic of China (Taiwan) suggests a more complicated view where economic self-interest on one side and national pride on the other may undermine traditional conceptions of recognition. Using the ROC-PRC diplomatic battle as a case study, this paper hopes to shed light on two questions: why, despite the PRC's rise as a global power, a country would continue to formally recognize the ROC and secondly what does the ROC receive in exchange for such high-cost endeavors to maintain recognition. In this case mutual ideological rationales have greatly diminished while I contend that economic factors have predominantly maintained this diplomatic battle. In addition, previous research often focuses on major world powers granting or withholding formal recognition to smaller states. In this situation, poor countries with typically little political influence are the major players, suggesting different rationales behind recognition. Methodologically, this paper blends qualitative and quantitative analysis to uncover factors affecting recogni- ...

Words: 6627 - Pages: 27

Free Essay

China Fragile Superpower

...China Fragile Superpower This page intentionally left blank Fragile Superpower Susan L. Shirk China 2007 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2007 by Susan L. Shirk Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Shirk, Susan L. China: fragile superpower / by Susan L. Shirk. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-19-530609-5 1. Nationalism—China. 2. China—Politics and government—2002– I. Title. JC311.S525 2007 320.951—dc22 2006027998 135798642 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper For Sam, Lucy, and David Popkin This page intentionally left...

Words: 135807 - Pages: 544

Premium Essay

Nixon and China

...Nixon and the U.S. Rapprochement with the People’s Republic of China When Nixon began his presidency, the relations between the United States and China had been fraught ever since Mao Zedong’s Communist Party achieved power and established the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1949. Less than a year later in 1950, the Korean War, in which American troops died at the hands of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, further exacerbated the situation. The next twenty years were characterized by American opposition to UN membership for Mainland China, three crises between the two nations in the Taiwan Straits, threats of nuclear attack, and the fighting of a proxy war in Vietnam. But the two decades of hostility and nonrecognition of the People’s Republic of China was brought to an end during President Richard Nixon’s administration, marked most prominently by Nixon’s historic visit to Mainland China in 1972. In ending this hostile estrangement, Nixon thus executed the first stage of a momentous diplomatic revolution in U.S. policy towards Communist China. This turning point, as Nixon and his National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger suggested, also “changed the world” by transforming a Cold War U.S.-Soviet bilateral international system into a tripolar one, in which powers are balanced and national interests are secured. In the process of the rapprochement, President Nixon, managed to show the world his sound judgment, pragmatic perspective, and negotiation strategy in the field...

Words: 3966 - Pages: 16

Free Essay

Natural Disasters and the Aftermath: Political Ambiguity in the Taiwan-Japan “Friendship

...Natural Disasters and the Aftermath: Political Ambiguity in the Taiwan-Japan “Friendship It seems natural that the emergency conditions in the wake of natural disasters compel the international community to take swift action to contribute humanitarian aid. However, in today’s East Asia, it is an area where nationalism is so heated and may work to oppose public sympathy. I n such a situation, how and what kind of rhetoric is used by people to appeal for public sympathy on an international scale? How disruptions in the ‘natural’ world are seen to reflect or reveal division in the social world? These questions intrigued me to look at the case of the “Taiwan-Japan Friendship” in the aftermath of the 311 Earthquake. Few would hesitate to characterize Taiwan’s status quo as a plight or a political ambiguity. Under pressure from China, international political correctness on the China-Taiwan issue has long inclined to overshadow and marginalize Taiwan. This kind of “normalization of abnormal status”, however, might be challenged or reconfigured by another “abnormal status”, such as a natural disaster. On March 11, 2011 a 9.0 earthquake struck Japan. The most powerful recorded earthquake in Japan’s history accompanied with the subsequent 10-metre-high tsunami and the following Fukushima nuclear leak accident eventually killed nearly 18000 people. In the aftermath of the 311 earthquake, Taiwan was the first nation to extend a helping hand to Japan and was also the biggest national...

Words: 1166 - Pages: 5