...In order to persist in a competitive market, corporations must make profit. The basic structure of all interactions under competitive conditions can be a Catch-22 (McGrath, 1984). There will always be mutual and contradictory interests at the same time. Chrysler Corporation had common economic interest, however they had conflicting cultural and moral views. In order to create value in and for organizations, it is sometimes effective to focus on expanding options, creating new ideas, self-organizing, and collaborative learning. Executive Chief Sergio Marchionne put a great deal of emphasis on changing the corporate culture at Chrysler. One way to assess his vision for Chrysler’s new culture is to classify it using the competing values framework (CVF). CVF provides a practical way for managers to understand, measure, and change organizational culture. The four basic types of culture include clan, adhocracy, hierarchy, and market (Kreitner & Kinicki 2013). As is the case with Chrysler, organizations may possess characteristics of each type, but they generally have one that is more dominant. At first glance it appears that Chrysler’s functions under a market culture; “a market culture has a strong external focus and values stability and control (Kreitner & Kinicki 2013).” It is clear that the primary goal of Marchionne was profitability, giving the company an external position. Secondly, Marchionne implemented change by his reaction to incidents and organizational crises...
Words: 532 - Pages: 3
...Travis McPhail MGMT 4390 Spring 2015 Dr. Jones Case Analysis: DaimlerChrysler In the case “DaimlerChrysler: Post-Merger News”, DaimlerChrysler is facing the strategic issue of figuring out how to bring together the two cultural differences between Daimler-Benz AG and the Chrysler Corporation that would create a positive and profitable synergy for DaimlerChrysler as a whole, while regaining stockholders trust. As the post-merger integration process accelerates, they need to identify opportunities to increase sales, reduce purchasing costs, and create new markets for DaimlerChrysler. DaimlerChrysler internal environment, the company went through many changes post-merger. Starting with the creation of the “Dream Team” in 1998, resignations of key members of the dream team led to a two-tiered board system: the supervisory board and the board of management. There was apparent unrest among top executives and a growing chasm between the Americans and Germans due to differences in management styles, processes, cultures and work styles. DaimlerChrysler implemented a variety of exchange programs designed to help the two companies meld an understanding of the cultural differences between the two and their respective countries. They created the Automotive Council, which allowed the sharing of innovation, knowledge, technologies and ideas between the two companies to drive future product integration. They also created the Executive Automotive Committee (EAC) which worked towards...
Words: 733 - Pages: 3
...views of the 2009 Chrysler-Fiat strategic alliance and its future prospects in the auto industry? The alignment between Fiat and Chrysler does not exactly save Chrysler. It gives Fiat an entry into the U.S. In short, Fiat is to get 35% of Chrysler, will not pay any cash for the stake, and it will give Chrysler access to its technology. Fiat had publicly said it wanted a production base in North America for its Alfa Romeo brand--and presumably the Fiat brand, too. Through its35% interest that it is getting in Chrysler, it would presumably have access to a U.S. plant to build its cars. The case is intended to have students look at the 2009 Chrysler-Fiat strategic alliance, its current issues, and future viability in the global auto industry. The new landscape of the American auto industry and the role of Fiat is analyzed in the cross-border tie-up. After de-merging with Daimler in 2007, Chrysler did not do well because of the 2008-2009 global financial crises and its bankruptcy filing. Chrysler’s other problems included its financial constraints and heightened competition in North America. The company had no choice but to look for a partner. During this process, Chrysler explored the possibility of a tie-up with GM, Ford, Volkswagen, Tata Motors, Nissan and Fiat. Eventually Chrysler decided on creating a strategic alliance where Fiat agreed on taking a 20 percent stake in Chrysler. In the next five years, the tie-up may increase Fiat’s ownership of Chrysler to 35 percent. Both...
Words: 1088 - Pages: 5
...CHRYSLER’S WARRANTS: SEPTEMBER 1983 (Written Analysis of Case) I. Statement of the Problem With Chrysler’s rapid recovery, exceeding profit expectations and increasing negative market factor resiliency, is the request to return its warrants held by government at no cost valid and justifiable? II. Objectives 1. Value the Chrysler warrants held by the government. 2. Determine the factors that affected the value of warrants over time. 3. Determine if the government’s guarantee is overpriced or underpriced. 4. Determine Chrysler’s bid price taking into account all the risks the government had run. 5. State a well-defined, reasonable, and accurate justification to support Chrysler’s claim. III. Areas of Consideration 1. The government’s warrant of Chrysler saved the company from a financial tragedy. 2. The impact on the federal budget of a Chrysler failure would be greater than the cost of assistance. 3. A Chrysler failure would disproportionately affect a city and a region that already had substantial economic problems. 4. Failure of Chrysler would lead to either greater monopoly power by surviving US firms, or worsening balance of payments as foreign producers captured increase US market share. 5. In the long term forecast, Chrysler actually has an increasing demand. 6. Common Stock Warrants 7. Chrysler requested from the government to surrender the warrants at little or no cost. 8. Lee Iacocca, CEO of Chrysler, stated that the government’s money was never at...
Words: 1551 - Pages: 7
...Case Study: Sergio Marchionne What are the observable artifacts, espoused values, and basic assumptions associated with Chrysler’s culture? An observable artifact is defined as the physical manifestations of an organization. These artifacts can include a company’s dress code, stories about the company, and rituals within the company (Kreitner & Kinicki, A.2013). The main observable artifact that Chrysler had, and the reason Mr. Marchionne was in distress was about, was the way manager Fong doubled rebates in order to make profit from the dealership sales. This approach was part of the culture that led the company to diminished lucrativeness. Another observable artifact came with the changes Mr. Marchionne implemented, such as his weekly meetings with his staff. Espoused values can be defined as the normal standards in which a company conducts business. A few of the espoused values mentioned in the text are, “the margins and vehicle quality needed to improve and better control over pricing was imperative” (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013, p.87). Mr. Marchionne went to Chrysler to change these values to make the company profitable again; Basic assumptions are the values of a company that have not been followed and begin to represent the company’s behavior (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013, p.87). Mr. Marchoinne implemented major changes at Chrysler by expelling executives, removing its bureaucracy and adding fear to the workforce. How is Mr. Marchionne trying to improve the PE...
Words: 838 - Pages: 4
...1.0 CASE BACKGROUND DaimlerChrysler AG was two huge automotive companies that were merged together and become fifth largest automaker and the third largest in sales. These two different companies come with a lot of differences such as countries, the cultural issues, the creative styling and product development and more. After the merger, appeared some major problem that hardly fixed by both of the company and yet there were some issues that occur after the integration until Tom Stallkamp wonder if the merger should be continue. 2.0 ISSUES The merger between the companies faced problems that mostly related to the cultural differences, the management of the companies, communications and misunderstanding in a lot of aspects. Besides that, is the merger between these two massive companies is the best strategies? 3.0 TOOL USED CAGE analysis is used in this problem solving. CULTURE Different personalities appeared because basically, after the recent aggressive change The Board of Management, Daimler can be said as a assertive and committed company where totally unlike Chrysler that tend to be little less rigid and sometimes can be flexible and go off on tangents. Their working lifestyle also showed obviously different for Daimler which they embraced formality and hierarchy while Chrysler favored open collars, and free-form discussion. There were also language barriers that happened between the affiliations when practically all the German executives spoke English while...
Words: 1687 - Pages: 7
...http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jan/21/business/fi-fiat21 Fiat and Chrysler sign alliance plan January 21, 2009|Ken Bensinger By taking a stake in Chrysler, Fiat may be providing a glimpse of the future of the auto industry, one that's a lot more global -- and where everybody scratches each other's back. The deal, announced as a letter of intent Tuesday, is not final but would give the Italian automaker a 35% stake in Chrysler, as well as access to Chrysler's U.S. manufacturing facilities and huge distribution network. In exchange, Chrysler would be able to sell its larger vehicles in Fiat's international dealerships and to add much-needed small, fuel-efficient cars to its fleet using Fiat's small engine and transmission technology. As such, it's a partnership that could, in theory, lead to Italian-engineered, U.S.-built Fiats being sold as Dodges at a dealership near you, and Mexican-made Dodges sold as Fiats in France. "I would love to sell Alfa Romeos or Fiats or Fiats badged as Dodges," said Jon Gray, owner of Orange Coast Chrysler Jeep Dodge in Costa Mesa. The partnership is the leading example of the business model du jour in the auto industry, one in which companies trade their strengths with competitors to cover their own weaknesses in the hope that both come out stronger. "Maybe the future for the industry consists in a series of alliances," said Thomas Klier, who, as a senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, has studied the auto business...
Words: 2127 - Pages: 9
...Chrysler and Daimler merger case 1) in 1998 the worldwide car market is growing (from 46 million in 1993 to 52 million in 1997), but more and more competitor are present in this business market in a worlwide level. In the 90's the incumbent competitors are threatening by the emergence of Korean manufacturers ( Hyundai, Kia ), because the firm are offering cheap and good quality cars. the emerging firms in the 90's are from Asia, where the work force is cheaper than in westerners country, in this way these firms can offering a high quality product ( Lexus, Infinity, etc) for an affordable price. Thus High end firms as Mercedes, BMW, are threatened by those firms. In this way to face with the competition most of companies are shifting their production toward developing countries for reducing their cost and compete in a better way with these emerging firms. Moreover according to some analysts there would be a reduction from 39 current producers to 20 major companies. That would be because of the high competition that would be especially due to present in the market. Furthermore each year the plant capacity exceeded demand of cars by15 million vehicles, thus the profitability of the firms is reduced, and that affect on the long term financial health of the different firms. Finally the industry is stroke by several mergers and acquisitions, which reinforce the competition in the markets. 2) In my point of view the merger make sense, because in a competitive market firms face...
Words: 982 - Pages: 4
...Running Head: THE STRUGGLE OF CHRYSLER The Struggle of Chrysler Valerie Steinmetz Pete Rohlman Kelly Jane McLaughlin Cardinal Stritch University College of Business and Management Rich Bruce, Instructor Business Communication January 28, 2010 Over the past ten years, America has had many historic moments. With planes flying into the World Trade Center to the election of our first African-American president, the American public has had much to be excited about and to fear. In more recent history, the American economy has been the main topic. From the Fall of Wall Street, crashing of the housing market, to the fall of the American Automakers. The government has stepped in to save the private market and attempt to restore life to what was once a corner stone in America. Chrysler was one of many companies to be bailed out by the government during 2008. This is a look at where Chrysler started to where they are today. The Chrysler name doesn’t mean much to residents of Kenosha. The auto plant has been called by many names since 1900, when Thomas Jeffery bought a bicycle factory and started mass-producing vehicles. These vehicles had two groundbreaking innovations: steering wheels and front-mounted engines. Historians say it was in Kenosha, not Detroit that cars began “to look like cars.” Vehicles jokingly referred to as Kenosha Cadillacs, were small, inexpensive, and sometimes, homely looking Ramblers. (Nichols...
Words: 5200 - Pages: 21
...DODGE DURANGO 2014 DODGE DURANGO 2014 MARKETING II Name: Tran Thanh Long ID: 1357030 Class: Tuesday Morning MARKETING II Name: Tran Thanh Long ID: 1357030 Class: Tuesday Morning Content: I/ EXECUTIVE SUMMAR II/ SITUATION ANALYSIS: 1. Dodge’s history 2. Product history 3. Describe Dodge Durango 2014 4. Product evaluation A. Industry analysis and Industry trend B. Product differentiation C. Sale history D. SWOT 5. Target market 6. Marketing objectives A. Need satisfying objective B. Long and short term sale market III/ ADVERTISING OBJECTIVES: 1. Product concept 2. Target market - Detailed description of target audience: Relationship between target market and target audience 3. Communication media 4. Advertising message I/ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Have you ever felt the power of a horse when you rode it? Imagine a herd of horses as they run through an open plain. You do not want to ride a herd of horses on the street, now you just need the new 2014 Dodge Durango. In this planner, you will be seeing, imagining and experiencing the unique way Dodge advertises using lower cost but still attracting more potential consumers of Dodge brand and Paramount Pictures, also you will get the information about the new Dodge Durango. "But for the most part, the Durango remains a stylish, aggressive-looking truck with available V-8 power, plenty of towing ability, and some new fuel-economy technology lurking...
Words: 4156 - Pages: 17
...Leadership DaimlerChrysler Merger: The Quest to Create “One Company” Tom Stallkamp, Chrysler president and executive in charge of accelerating integration of the recently merged Daimler and Chrysler companies, was feeling great frustration. Why couldn’t he move the integration process along more rapidly? He could see clearly the amazing potential for payoffs, but it just wasn’t happening. He wasn’t used to being unable to move the organization, and he hated the feeling of being able to visualize great things without being able to mobilize people to action. What else could he do? Maybe it was time to let the two cultures duke it out, and allow the stronger one to win. That would be one kind of integration, though not quite what he had been working for. Background At 4:00pm on November 12, 1998 as the final bell rang on the New York Stock Exchange, U.S. automaker Chrysler Corporation and German automaker Daimler-Benz ceased to exist. They emerged the next day as a new global conglomerate named DaimlerChrysler AG. With combined revenues of $130 billion and a market capitalization of $92 billion, DaimlerChrysler became the fifth largest automaker in the world in number of vehicles sold and third largest in sales. The $40 billion stock deal was the largest ever in the industrial world. Upon completion of the transaction Daimler stockholders owned 57 percent of the new DaimlerChrysler and Chrysler stockholders the remaining 43 percent. After ten months of discussions and negotiations...
Words: 10521 - Pages: 43
...Fiat plays double or quits with Chrysler Introduction Below are two articles about the merger between Fiat and Chrysler. Please read these and analyse them in the context of TWO of the theoretical frameworks ( One from OS, One from HR) which have been reviewed and considered in this course. Your answer should include: A brief summary of the relevant theories, and any evidenced based critique of those theories You should then apply those three concepts to this case study, so as to illustrate how they apply, or may be contradicted, in the Fiat –Chrysler merger. From The Economist, 27 November 2010, P 73-74 IN JANUARY Fiat cars will be back on sale in America for the first time in 27 years. The tiny, retro-styled Fiat 500 will appear in the showrooms of 130 dealers across the country. It was launched at the Los Angeles motor show last week, alongside a revamped Chrysler range. Fiat’s return to America is the first visible result of what is intended to be an ever closer union with Chrysler, agreed on last year when the Detroit giant was in bankruptcy. The two companies are betting that the Fiat 500—designed by Frank Stephenson, the man behind BMW’s transatlantic success with the MINI—will also prove as popular with Americans as it has with Europeans. Returning to a country from which Fiat was driven out by poor quality—Americans used to quip that its name stood for “Fix It Again, Tony”—is a big risk. But the reward is to get back into one of the world’s largest...
Words: 2127 - Pages: 9
...Case Study 3 The 2009 Chrysler-Fiat Strategic Alliance 1. What are your views of the 2009 Chrysler-Fiat strategic alliance and its future prospects in the auto industry? When it comes to dealing with worldwide economic recession, grave steps have to be taken in order to ensure the survival of businesses, as too many livelihoods depend on it. Also, due to the investments that shareholders make, and the wide array of other businesses that the company would affect, it puts a lot of pressure on the board or the people running the company to make sure that they survive the bad times and emerge victorious. For Chrysler, it was a major setback when Daimler decided to withdraw its partnership and give its 80 per cent stake to Cerberus for less than 1/4th of the price they bought it for. Chrysler was doing badly, and although known as the “Number Three” car in North America, it was not able to keep up and had to declare bankruptcy and was told to form a strategic alliance with a company as a part of the Obama Administration rescue plan. Fiat has had its own share of ups and downs, but in the European market it has proven to be successful. It withdrew itself from the North American market in the nineteen eighties as it could not keep up there. But now, with its strategic alliance with Chrysler, it can benefit by entering into the North American market without having to push too much as Chrysler is already a well-known brand there. The Strategic Alliance was definitely very...
Words: 2916 - Pages: 12
...Organizational Change of the Chrysler Corporation in the 1978 Bailout and Lee Iacocca Dustin T. Embler BA 401 Research Paper/Case Study Abstract In the year 1978 one of the United States largest corporations was on the brink of financial crisis, the Chrysler Corporation. Hundreds of jobs, billions of taxpayer dollars, and the success of an American company all lay in the balance. Chrysler was overcome in debt due to its subpar decision making, increasing government regulations, and inability to compete with its domestic and foreign competition. Nevertheless, a hero arrived when Lee Iacocca joined as President of Chrysler to aid to its recovery in such adverse times. Fighting his way through the United States legislation for financial assistance to save Chrysler, Iacocca is able to successfully get the necessary legislation passed that will not only help him keep the company afloat but to also change the entire organization into a successful and profitable business in a matter of years. History of the Chrysler Corporation and Lee Iacocca “The Chrysler Corporation was founded in 1925 by Walter P. Chrysler, a former railroad mechanic who rose through the ranks of GM to lead the highly successful Buick Division. Chrysler did not get along well with William Durant, the founder and head of GM, and eventually left to form his own company (Braun).” “Always short of capital in this capital-intensive business, Chrysler was forced to build its cars largely of purchased parts...
Words: 3022 - Pages: 13
...- Lessons in Post-Merger Integration - Jan Daniel Laufhütte 2304958 Individual Written Case Study Report in Strategic Management IHS-3-422 London South Bank University 17/12/2003 Table of Contents List of Figures................................................................................. i Introduction ................................................................................... 1 1. The changing world automobile industry .............................. 1 2. Reasons for mergers and acquisitions .................................. 3 2.1. 2.2. Daimler-Benzs’ motives..................................................................... 3 Chryslers’ motives ............................................................................. 5 3. The Post-Merger Integration Structure................................... 7 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. Preparations for the merger .............................................................. 7 Integration Structure of DaimlerChrysler......................................... 7 Expected Synergies ........................................................................... 8 4. Cultural Issues ......................................................................... 9 4.1. 4.2. 4.3. Daimler-Benz’s Culture...................................................................... 9 Chrysler’s Culture ............................................................................ 10 Key Integration Problems and Post-Merger Business Culture ....
Words: 3210 - Pages: 13
