Premium Essay

Clarence Earl Gideon's Trial

Submitted By
Words 186
Pages 1
Clarence Earl Gideon is a man who was accused of larceny or robbery. On June 3, 1961 he was claimed to have stolen wine, beer, and a couple of cigarettes. He was sent to a trial for another misdemeanor or a felony. He couldn’t afford a lawyer, but was also not given a lawyer either. Gideon was pronounced guilty and was sent the prison for 5 years. Trying to get out of prison and regain his freedom, Gideon started to read some information to have a fair trial. He wrote a letter to the Supreme Court stating that the sixth amendment says “you should have a lawyer if you can’t afford one.”After a while they reviewed his case, and gave him another trial. Gideon was pronounced not guilty. While the trial was going on, they inferred that Lester Wade

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Case Study: Gideon V. Wainwright

...Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) In Gideon v. Wainwright, Clarence Earl Gideon was convicted of breaking and entering into a pool hall, and he was also charged of stealing money and alcohol. At his trial, Gideon did not have the sufficient funds to get an attorney, so he asked the judge if he could be appointed an attorney. Gideon’s request was denied by the judge because according to the Florida law, the only time a attorney could be appointed to someone was for poor defendants who were charged with capital offenses. This is the point where the constitutional issue began. Gideon fended for himself as best as he could but failed and was sent to prison. While serving his time, Gideon insisted that he should have been appointed an attorney, so he did research based on the prison library. After he was well informed he petitioned the Supreme Court arguing that he should have been appointed an attorney but his request was denied. And that was his constitutional issue, people should be appointed an attorney if they cannot afford one even if they are not being charged with a capital offense and he claimed...

Words: 532 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Gideon's Trumpet

...Gideon’s Trumpet, by: Anthony Lewis Clarence Earl Gideon was born on August 30, 1910 in Missouri. Gideon lost his father when he was three years old. His home life was non existent as he ran away from home when he finished eighth grade and started living his life as a homeless drifter. By the time that Gideon reached the age of sixteen he had an extensive list of petty crimes. At age eighteen he was arrested in Missouri and convicted of robbery, larceny and burglary. Gideon was sentenced to ten years in prison but was released in 1932 after serving three years. Gideon would spend most of the next thirty years in poverty and in and out of prison. Throughout this time he was married four times, the first three marriages ended very quickly but the last marriage in the 1950’s would last longer. Gideon and his wife settled in Panama City, Florida after having three children who would later be taken away by welfare authorities. Gideon found work as an electrician but gambled to subsidize his low income. Gideon would not go back to jail again until 1961. On June 3, 1961 four fifths of wine, twelve bottles of Coca Cola, twelve cans of beer, about five dollars from the cigarette machine and sixty dollars from the juke box were stolen from Bay Harbor Poolroom which belonged to Ira Strickland Jr. A twenty-two year old resident that lived close by, Henry Cook, told the police that he saw Gideon get into a cab after walking out of the pool hall with a bottle of wine and pockets...

Words: 3150 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Film Analysis Gideon's Trumpet

...Gideon’S Trumpe Film The movie “Gideon’s trumpet” tells the story of Clarence Earl Gideon, shows how he was fighting for the right to have publicly funded legal counsel for the needy. This man was of an average intelligence, a four-time loser without a financial support, but very stubborn about what he was doing. The events that described in this movie, remained in the history of the law. In 1961, when Earl Gideon was fifty one, he was arrested, prosecuted, and sent to the jail for breaking and entering with the intent to commit petty larceny. He was sentenced to five years in state prison. He applied to the Florida Supreme Court for a writ of habeas corpus, but it was rejected. Gideon had some knowledge of the workings of the Supreme Court...

Words: 695 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Supreme Court Case: Gideon V. Wainwright

...The Sixth Amendment of the Constitution states that “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right … to have the assistance of counsel for his defense” (law). Although the right to counsel is found at the very end of this amendment, it is just as important as the right to a speedy and public trial, or the right to an impartial jury. In 1961, a man named Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested in the state of Florida. He requested an attorney because he could not afford one, but this request was denied by the judge. Two years later, the Supreme Court heard and decided on a case called Gideon v. Wainwright, where it was stated that the Sixth Amendment’s right to counsel was essential to a fair trial. It therefore became unconstitutional to deny counsel to a poor person facing a felony charge. Gideon v. Wainwright was a remarkable Supreme...

Words: 1633 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Clarence Earl Gideon: The Wainwright

...In 1963, a man named Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested for breaking and entering into a pool hall in Panama City, Florida. His objective was to break into the building’s vending machines to steal money from them. Clarence was a very poor man who ran away from his home at a young age. He had the education of an eighth-grader. Clarence then became a drifter. He committed little crimes in order to gain small amounts of cash here and there. He was often caught and had become a regular in the county jail. Gideon once again found himself in the Florida court house, but this time he was in danger of up to a five-year jail sentence. Clarence was too poor to afford an attorney, and was never granted one. He had to handle every aspect of his trial all...

Words: 669 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Gideon Vs Wainwright

...changed how the justice and judicial system worked. This court case leaves a remarkable imprint for the future of court rulings and decision making. On August 4th, 1961, a man by the name of Clarence Earl Gideon was convicted of breaking and entering with the intent of committing a misdemeanor. Under Florida law, this was seen as a felony, a pretty serious crime as to go to trial for it. The day of Gideon’s trial, he appeared in court without an attorney. Upon his request for one since he could not afford it, the The trial judge denied his request because under Florida law, the appointment of a representative was only permitted for defendants charged with capital offenses....

Words: 475 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Betts V. Wainwright Case Study

...His actions shaped how the judicial system in the United States worked. Gideon was a man that came from nothing. He was a 51-year-old man who had been convicted of four previous felonies, but none violent, and thus turned to crime in order to support himself because he was unable to settle down and work. Even when Gideon’s grammar was not perfect, his in forma pauperis would have ensured that future defendants, have a fair trial and would ensure that the progress of law continues to be altered, as needed, as time passes on. Gideon's actions are said to be courageous. One that was small, but one that had enormous ramifications as a result of his now famous in forma pauperis. Written with pencil, which is usually not common practice, he wrote to the United States Supreme Court about this issue. Knowing that the nine justices actually only hear a small portion of cases brought upon them by many individuals, he still persisted and at the end, change court history with this issue with the United States Court...

Words: 659 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Supreme Court Case: Gideon V. Wainwright

...of which is the story of Clarence Earl Gideon. Gideon Petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States of America for a writ of certiorari, founded in his belief that he, a poor man, should have the right to an attorney after he was convicted of robbing a pool house in the early 1960’s. Despite originally being found guilty, Gideon was determined to appeal to the courts and gain his freedom under the premise that his right to due process of law was violated. He created a movement in history that led to the establishment of universal right to counsel within the United States legal system. After a tedious case, that did not look as though it would bode well for Gideon, he was successful in persuading the Supreme Court to accept his appeal....

Words: 1331 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Study

...Judges also decide what issues will be raised, he or she can manipulate the range of values which could be given effect in a verdict. For instance, the landmark case of Gideon vs. Wainwright. This case involved Clarence Earl Gideon, charged with a felony due to breaking and entering a poolroom with the intent to commit a misdemeanor crime. Gideon reported to court without a lawyer and requested for one to be appointed to him. This request was denied, for Florida state law can only appoint an indigent defendant in capital cases. Therefore, Gideon represented himself in trial, he was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison. Gideon then filed a habeas corpus petition in the Florida Supreme Court arguing that his constitutional rights...

Words: 278 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Gideon vs Wainwright

... 2014. America at this time: America at this time: | | | On June 3rd, 1961, Clarence Earl Gideon broke into the Bay Harbor Pool Room on Everitt Avenue in Panama City, Florida. A witness said that Gideon had been stealing money from the vending machines, and police later found him with more than $25 in change in his pockets. Gideon was arrested for vagrancy and was charged for breaking and entering. During his first trial, Gideon asked the judge to appoint him a defense attorney, as he was unable to afford one. The judge refused though, stating that he could only provide Gideon with an attorney if he had been charged with a capital offense. Gideon argued that he was entitled to an attorney because of what the Sixth Amendment states. Nonetheless, Gideon was put on trial and was sentenced to five years in prison on August 4th, 1961. While in prison, Gideon wrote a writ of habeas corpus, which was a letter demanding that he be brought before the court once more in order to determine if he had been held legally or should be released. Gideon first sent this to the Florida Supreme Court and was denied. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, and they agreed to hear the case once more. On March 18th, 1963, the Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision written by Justice Hugo Black, stated Gideon’s conviction was unconstitutional and agreed to give him a new trial. They stated that the Sixth Amendment said “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall...

Words: 1495 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Gideon's Second Trial Case Study

...On August 4, 1961 a poor 50-year-old man named Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested in Panama City, Florida after being accused of breaking and entering into the Bay Harbour pool hall and stealing money from the hall's vending machines. Gideon, could not afford a lawyer himself so he requested that an attorney be appointed to represent him. He had to defend himself in a Florida court because the judge in the case refused to appoint him a free lawyer because Florida law says they only appoint lawyers for poor defendants charged with capital offenses. The jury found Gideon guilty and was charged in Florida state court with a felony and sentenced five years in prison. Gideon wrote to the Florida Supreme Court and they denied his petition. Then he...

Words: 1105 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Summary: Gideon V. Wainwright

...Gideon v. Wainwright The Warren Court also reviewed the case of Gideon v. Wainwright which was a case that changed the history of criminal procedure. Clarence Earl Gideon was a man who believed that he deserved to have his voice heard after being denied a right to counsel when he was arrested for petty larceny and breaking into a poolroom in Panama City, Florida in June 1961. At trail Gideon ask for a lawyer to defend his case since he could not afford one himself. Unfortunately, his request was denied since under Florida law a lawyer could be provided only if the defendant was charged with a capital offense. Gideon had no choice but to represent himself and was found guilty. Gideon then filed a writ of habeas corpus, but it was denied. After forwarding his petition in 1963 The Supreme Court then agreed to review his case. Now, the Warren Court was faced with reviewing the issue of whether the state court violated Gideon’s right to a fair trial and due process of law which was protected by the Sixth and Fourteens Amendments. In a unanimous decision, the Warren...

Words: 774 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Summary

...The Indigent Defender: Gideon versus Wainwright Do you think indigent defendants, or defendants without lawyers should be provided with lawyers in all court cases? Gideon versus Wainwright is a case that will decide if indigent defendants will. The case of whether indigent defendants should be provided with lawyers. There have been many other cases similar to this, like Powell versus Alabama, Palko versus Connecticut, and Betts versus Brady. Indigent defendants should not be provided lawyers in court unless their offense is capital. The case started in 1961 when a homeless man by the name of Clarence Earl Gideon was caught “Breaking and entering into a Panama City, Florida, pool hall and stealing money from the hall's vending machines” (Mcbride). He stole less than one hundred dollars and some...

Words: 746 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Rights

... one will be provided for them at no charge. However, the right to a court-appointed attorney is relatively new. The federal government started providing court-appointed attorneys for felony defendants in the nineteenth century, and some states began appointing lawyers for indigent felony defendants in the early twentieth century. But in 1963, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that an attorney must be provided to all criminal defendants in state and federal cases. The case that changed American jurisprudence was Gideon v. Wainwright. Clarence Earl Gideon was a homeless ex-convict with an eighth-grade education. He was arrested in 1961 in Panama City for breaking and entering into a pool hall, a felony under Florida law. At his trial, he asked the court to appoint him a lawyer, but the judge in his case ruled that state law only allowed court-appointed attorneys for capital offenses. Gideon was therefore forced to represent himself during his trial, and not surprisingly, he was convicted by a jury and sentenced to five years in a state penitentiary. While in prison, Gideon wrote a letter to the U.S. Supreme Court asking the Court to review his case, and the Court decided to settle the question of who was entitled to have a court-appointed lawyer. In Gideon, the...

Words: 1078 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Influential Court Cases

...Clarence Earl Gideon was a very poor man(Usc). He had needed some money. He went to a pool house/hangout which was closed and broke in(Kent). He had smashed the door and entered the building. He went to a cigarette machine and broke it and stole cigarettes. He then stole money from a machine. He also went behind the counter and stole beer, soda, and wine(Kent). A man by the name of Henry Cook saw him walking out of the pool house with a bottle of wine and some money hanging out of Clarence Earl Gideon's pockets(Scott). Gideon was found in a tavern and arrested. Gideon was arrested for breaking and entering. He was also arrested for theft. Gideon was taken to the Bay County Circuit Court(Usc). He was ready to be defended but he could not be. Gideon was a poor man. He could not afford a lawyer or attorney so he thought of asking if he could have one(Kent). He had asked if he could have one but the court said that an attorney can only be appointed to indigent defendants in capital cases(Scott)...

Words: 1713 - Pages: 7