Free Essay

Compare and Contrast the Ways in Which the Authors William Shakespeare, George Orwell and Jeanette Winterson Examine the Effects of Control in Their Texts the Taming of the Shrew, Nineteen Eighty-Four and Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit

In: English and Literature

Submitted By littlebjorn
Words 3348
Pages 14
Compare and contrast the ways in which the authors William Shakespeare, George Orwell and Jeanette Winterson examine the effects of control in their texts The Taming of the Shrew, Nineteen Eighty-Four and Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit.

William Shakespeare’s comedy The Taming of the Shrew attempts to present a comedic mockery of 16th century values. Shakespeare presents to the audience the farce of marriage values, the treatment of women and the control employed to tame those who were deemed ‘unruly.’ Shakespeare uses this technique in order to highlight to his audience the ridiculousness and brutality of their actions and, furthermore, to present to a modern audience the upheld expectations and beliefs of 16th century society and the ridiculousness of said societal values. The very title of the play alone – “The Taming of the Shrew” – through the language “taming” and “shrew,” indicates that there is something undesirable about a women acting of her own accord and thus she requires ‘taming.’ In the 1949 novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell uses control in an attempt to warn the reader of the dangers of totalitarianism after having witnessed the harrowing lengths that governments were willing to go to in order to sustain sovereign authority. Orwell was deeply disturbed by the cruelty and oppression that he had witnessed in Communist countries and was concerned by the increasing use of technology as a means of control; as presented by his use of the telescreen. Within Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit, a bildungsroman; meaning a novel of formation or education, set within the 1960s – a period of time that was witnessing the beginning of personal liberation and a decrease in conservative values – Jeanette Winterson presents a heartfelt critique of religion and control through a young girl’s exploration of life and coming of age whilst saturated by religious zeal.

Within the texts each author examines the effects of control; in Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit, Jeanette Winterson aims to show the effects of maternal and religious control, following young girl Jeanette in her exploration of life and coming of age while saturated by religious zeal; within Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell employs glimpses into Ministry worker Winston Smith’s repetitive life and the terror tactics used by the government to display to the reader the depressing effects of totalitarian control; in The Taming of the Shrew, Shakespeare attempts to present Elizabethan ideals of marriage and the control employed to ‘tame’ women who were deemed unruly.

Throughout each novel, people are controlled by godlike and faceless ideas and concepts; they are kept in control by omnipresent, monolithic figureheads; God; Big Brother; the patriarchy. Each author employs a paternal, elusive concept to keep people in check. For Winterson in Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit it is God. From a psychoanalytical or Freudian perspective, God represents the paternal figure in Jeanette’s life, an overarching central figure, delegating the ways in which she should live her life, very similarly to Shakespeare’s use of the patriarchy as a figure of control in The Taming of the Shrew. The patriarchy is a faceless, ultimately non-existent figure; it is simply a result of societal traditions. Within Nineteen Eighty-Four, Orwell calls upon Big Brother who warns of eradication like the Christian threat of hellfire. Ultimately we learn that an omnipotent, omnipresent figure keeps citizens subconsciously under control and keeps them obedient and disposable.

Primarily, within Nineteen Eighty-Four the main type of control used by the party is psychological control. Through Winston’s eyes, the reader begins to understand the techniques that the Party uses to control its members. Winston experiences a world where leaders ditch the truncheons and boots for a quieter, less conspicuous method of control: psychological manipulation. From Winston’s telescreen, which provides news, his daily exercise instructions and bombards him with information as to who he should hate and why, to the propaganda covering the walls of ministry buildings and the places he spends his free time, constantly reminding him: “Big Brother is Watching You.” Orwell uses this to convey that Winston simply cannot get away from Big Brother and, through that, he cannot escape the cold clutches of totalitarianism; the reader must understand that “nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres inside your skull.” The Party, in essence, controls reality, so much so that they would eventually make it that two plus two is five, realising the importance of psychological independence Winston believes that “freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four.” This links to the ways in which God is presented in Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit, Jeanette lives through the belief that God is not your friend – he is your father, your judge, he is to be respected. At times, Big Brother occupies such an intangible position that the love party members are expected to uphold could be likened to a Godlike worship. The party slogan – “War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength” – is the greatest display of control the party has over the minds of its members. Primarily, “War is Peace” tells us that party members are led to believe that they constantly have a common enemy; Winston often talks of how the enemy of Airstrip One changes very often, but people rarely notice and mindlessly continue their hatred from subject to subject. Political scientists such as Schlesinger would comment that a common enemy keeps the people united and Orwell would have experienced this common enemy during his experiences in real life warfare. Secondly, the juxtaposition of “Freedom is Slavery” tells party members that on their own, they are worthless. This point finds a link with The Taming of the Shrew in the way that Katherina, and women of the Elizabethan era, were made to believe that without their fathers, without men, they were worthless. Orwell uses these methods of control to highlight to an audience that widespread control is not always obvious. The Party also relies on Newspeak; a new language designed by the Party to reduce the amount of words within people’s vocabulary therefore making it harder for people to rebel their oppression and easier for the Party to manipulate its members. Once the party has control over the mind of its members, it can slowly and insidiously begin to shape their consciences until, eventually; they mindlessly obey orders and correct their own behaviour, calling for a lesser need of physical control. Winston begins to take note of the fact that if the universe exists only in the mind, and the Party controls the mind, then the Party controls the universe.

Within The Taming of the Shrew, control relies on deep rooted societal values and the existence of the patriarchy and presents to the audience the domestication and training of a human being who seems to be treated otherwise. Petruchio considers himself to be a tamer who must tame his wife and mould her into the perfect woman. Petruchio likens his plan to training a “falcon” and claims that he is going to “kill [Katherina] with kindness,” suggesting that he will simply “kill” the parts of Katherina that he doesn’t approve of, leaving her merely an aesthetically pleasing shell, and see her obedient and compliant. Shakespeare uses binary opposition of the words “kill” and “kindness” to convey a sense of morbidity that is somehow pleasant enough to be accepted by society. The way that Petruchio controls his wife is through psychological control by humiliating and degrading her, patronising and starving her, burning her to the ground so he can rebuild her the way he wants her. The ridiculous outfit Petruchio wears to his wedding is a display of the control Petruchio has over his wife, through this, coupled with her being too exhausted to protest, he is his able to humiliate her into submission. This is similar to the way that Baptista controlled his daughters, constantly using Katherina as a scapegoat, wishing her to be more like her sister; kind, quiet, yielding. This leads the reader to question: Does Katherina’s shrewishness stem from anxiety about her own undesirability and the feeling that she will never find a husband the way she is? Ultimately we begin to learn that Bianca is tired of being the archetypal woman, arguably she is simply a ‘shrew’ in disguise. Through this, we learn that women must be pretty, obedient and easily manipulated in order to find husbands, even if Petruchio himself is boisterous, obnoxious and often drunk. For instance, punching the priest at his own wedding to his dear Bianca. Through the text we learn that the 16th century institution of marriage was motivated by fortune, to see husbands and fathers at financial gain and through this, women are systematically oppressed.

When Winston first meets Julia, we can gain an understanding of how warped his sense of sexual desire has become as he says to her “I wanted to rape you and then murder you afterwards.” From this we can gather that through years of sexual oppression and a reliance prole prostitutes for gratification, Winston has developed a desire to control someone in the same way that Big Brother controls him. On the surface of Winston and Julia’s relationship, there is no romance or desire, their affair is a political act, supported by the fact that their first sexual affair “was a blow struck against the Party.” This is because the Party forbids love in near every capacity other than that towards Big Brother, especially an unlawful sexual relation like Winston and Julia’s affair and Orwell uses the presentation of forbidden love to show the reader that this utter, dictatorial control has no room for personal motives, no room for individual prosperity or happiness, it is a system of giving all you have for the betterment of the Party. However, behind the unadulterated lust and use of sex for rebellion we see an element of hope from Winston and Julia’s relationship, when Julia hands Winston the note reading “I love you” in the corridor he, for the first time in years, feels human. Winston feels respected in his individual capacity, not as a cog in the totalitarian machine. Orwell uses this to show us the ways in which the very nature of our humanity, or love and our freedom would be limited, near abolished, through totalitarian control and to highlight that the party has ultimate control over its members, in every element of their lives, even down to their will to live, by referring to them as a faceless, replaceable workforce. Within Nineteen Eighty-Four, Winston attempts to prove the power of the people; his interest in proles is based on his belief that if they were to rise up, they could shake off totalitarian governmental control like flies on the back of a horse.

The element of forced love is very prominent in Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit as Jeanette’s mother forces from her daughter absolute devotion to Christ, to the Church and to the Bible. Every element of Jeanette’s life is controlled by the strict guidelines her mother enforces through Christianity. This can be noted from Jeanette’s description of her mother, “She had never heard of mixed feelings. There were friends and there were enemies,” we can gather from this that Jeanette’s mother is someone with extremely rigid boundaries; people are holy or people are evil. There is no room for those who do not believe in God to be good people and this sets the precedent for the conflict Jeanette will have with her mother further on in the novel. Finding affinity with Winston of Nineteen Eighty-Four, Jeanette stands insurgent against the accepted belief of what she should believe and the love she should give the massively illusive idol of God, similarly to Winston’s rebellion towards the elusive figurehead of Big Brother. Jeanette does not believe she is doing anything wrong by discovering her own sexuality and giving love to those she feels passion for rather than those she is told to love, drawing a parallel with The Taming of the Shrew, as Katherina has no real choice in the decision of who she will marry, it is down to her father to judge her potential suitor and to agree a dowry upon the marriage, Shakespeare does this to present how women of the Elizabethan era were treated; passed from father to husband like a ragdoll. This resolves itself by sending Katherina to near insanity, which leads to exhaustion, and eventually submission. This draws a parallel with Winston’s eventual obedience in Nineteen Eighty-Four, after he has been worn down in Room 101, betrayed by O’Brien – someone he thought he could trust – much like Katherina is manipulated by her husband, someone who should love and care for her. However, audience perception of a husband has changed quite dramatically over the last five hundred years, for a 16th century audience, marriage was very much a financial agreement not a promise or love nor commitment.

We learn that predominately, the effect of control is rebellion, much like compressing a spring for too long – it must return to its original, liberated position, in the same way that people, when oppressed for far too long, will ultimately begin questioning their position. For Jeanette in Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit, her mother kept her spellbound and clueless, ignorant of the world outside of the Bible, so when she attends school she realises that the world is not simply a sequence of scripture, but rather it is vast and we see Jeanette thinking for herself. After Jeanette is revoked from the Church due to her romantic feelings for Melanie, she realises that she must move on and she cannot continue living in the past, through this she develops a profound understanding of herself and her disillusionment from the Church is vastly unimportant. This is presented in Jeanette saying to Melanie, “I love you almost as much as I love the Lord,” we can see here that Jeanette’s priorities are slowly changing, she is beginning to escape the control of her mother’s religious zeal. She may not refute God himself completely but she appears to begin to refuse her mother’s zealousness towards the Bible and the ways in which she forced Jeanette to practice it in every element of her life. Through this, Winterson presents the main theme of Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit: being yourself and not being shaped by the beliefs of someone else. Here, the texts find dissimilarity, as Nineteen Eighty-Four and The Taming of the Shrew resolve themselves very differently. For Winston of Nineteen Eighty-Four, he is forced into eventual submission by the use of fear, presenting to the audience that totalitarianism is exactly that: total control. If the Party cannot obtain that through insidious, inconspicuous indoctrination, they will do so by force or you will be eradicated and forgotten about. It appears to the reader that Winston would sooner live another day, slowly being drained of any will to live, quietly rebelling within his mind, continuing his doublethink, than be eradicated in vain. Likewise, for Katherina in The Taming of the Shrew exhaustion, abuse, and eventually submission see her as the ideal wife. Perhaps in her mind she is rebelling still, much like Winston of Nineteen Eighty-Four.

The main effect of control within Nineteen Eighty-Four is that of forbidden and forced love; party members are told exactly how to feel, through bombardment of propaganda, insidiously through their telescreens and blatantly during Ten Minutes Hate, when party members are told exactly who to hate and why. Big Brother uses control to force from party members complete devotion; reducing sex and procreation to a mere chore to be performed for the furtherance of the Party. Through this, we can note Julia’s rebellion through the use of sex and lust and we learn that “simple undifferentiated desire … would tear the Party to pieces.” This holds similarity with Jeanette’s use of love as rebellion in Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit as she does what she feels to be naturally right and, through this, stands against what it is she is told to believe and, furthermore, Katherina’s use of rebellion in The Taming of the Shrew; she stands against indoctrination and suppression in order to be who she wants to be, even if by the end of the novel when she finds herself mindlessly obedient. Each author is presenting a moral of standing up for what you believe to be right and not simply believing and adhering to what you are told, presenting the importance of individuality and liberty.

From a feminist perspective, the control within The Taming of the Shrew can be interpreted in two different ways, the first of which sees Shakespeare tackling the archetypal constructs of misogyny and refuting the belief that women are the lesser sex and criticising the archaic institution of marriage with fortune as a motivation, using Katherina as the catalyst in his fiery attack of 16th century social order, empowering women to challenge their position in both their families and society. However, some audiences have taken a less positive view of Shakespeare’s opinion on women and argue that interpret Katherina’s eventual weakness to Petruchio’s various attacks on her humanity as obedience to the patriarch, quietly rebelling in her mind alone, like her sister Bianca and therefore reflecting Shakespeare’s view of what all women should do. As the text takes form in a play, varying interpretations are taken to the stage and very often this makes it difficult to present the original idea as it includes the influence of a budding director as well as Shakespeare himself. Very often, the contrasting viewpoint is that Katherina’s suffering is played for laughs, she is starved, deprived of sleep, beaten, refused food all because she refuses to adhere to male orders, which begs the question: Is The Taming of the Shrew Shakespeare’s display of a poor reality, played for laughs in order to show his audience their ridiculousness and light-heartedness towards the scenario, or a brutal display of how women should be treated, further ridiculed by comedy? Critics of Orwell also often praised his subversive political approach and it was said by Rushbrook Williams, Orwell’s BBC boss, that had Nineteen Eighty-Four been written earlier in history it would have been him “either canonised – or burnt at the stake,” this goes to further the argument that Winston, and therefore Orwell, stood against the accepted and established beliefs of the time, much like Jeanette Winterson and William Shakespeare in Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit and The Taming of the Shrew, respectively.

Through the use of control, the authors show the reader the importance of freedom. Nineteen Eighty-Four predicts a grim reality of how totalitarianism would leave humanity; abysmal, desolate and lonely. Orwell presents control as absolute, all-consuming and totalitarian. Through the belief that ‘a thought alone is the biggest display of freedom,’ Orwell urges readers to think for themselves, to stand up and oppose rigid governmental control or the conditions of Nineteen Eighty-Four will become a harsh reality in a little less than 35 years; “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stepping on a human face – forever.” Nineteen Eighty-Four attempts to show us the importance and beauty of the individual mind, something the Party rigorously attempts to eradicate. Within Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit, Winterson attempts to convey the importance of the need to find your own identity. Using Jeanette’s coming of age and disillusionment with the Church as a catalyst to present to the audience the moral of finding yourself for yourself, not allowing any bigoted or dogmatic influences allow you to be ignorant of the freedom you deserve. From this we can determine that Shakespeare, Orwell and Winterson stand dissident against the accepted doctrine and attempt to influence their reader, or audience, to go forth and think for themselves.

Word count: 3,267
Bibliography:
Orwell, George: Nineteen Eighty-Four
William, Shakespeare: The Taming of the Shrew
Winterson, Jeanette: Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

George Orwell

...Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty Four (1984). A year later after he was born, his mother brought both him and his sister to England in which his father, a British civil servant stayed in India because he was stationed there. Even as early as a child, he was already battling with the flu and bronchitis although at an early age, he was already into writing. When he got older, he went to school but then was set back a few years for college because his family couldn’t afford it so he ended up joining the Imperial Police Force in 1922. After five years, he resigned and decided to continue his journey as a writer. He came up with his first book Down and Out in Paris and London which was about how life was living in the two cities. He didn’t want to embarrass his family’s name so he decided to use his pseudonym ‘George Orwell’ as the author for his future works. Orwell then wrote about his other experiences overseas, British Colonialism in Burma and part of the country’s Indian empire. In 1937 he married Eileen O'Shaughnessy and then later on went to Spain to battle in the Spanish Civil War. He got badly injured being shot at the neck and arm. After being partially healed, he later on battled another sickness-tuberculosis in 1938. Despite battling his sickness, he still decided to keep writing to support himself. Orwell found himself acting as a propagandist to advance the country's side. He loathed this part of his job and resigned in 1943. Around this time, Orwell became the......

Words: 548 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

William Shakespeare

...General Santos City A TERM PAPER On THE LEGACY OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement in English IV S.Y. 2012-2013 Submitted to: MR. JUDY L. BALDEMOR, MaEd Submitted by: MICHELLE P. BERDONAR The Legacy of William Shakespeare Shakespeare, William (1564-1616), was an English playwright and poet. He is generally considered as the greatest dramatist the world has ever known and the finest poet who has written in the English language. Shakespeare has also been the world’s most popular author. No writer’s play have been produced so many times or read widely in so many countries. Scholars have written thousands of books and articles about his plots, characters, themes, and language. As a matter of fact, almost four hundred years after Shakespeare’s death there are 157 million referring him on Google. He began a successful life in London. Shakespeare’s profession was acting. He is listed in documents of 1592, 1598 and 1603 as an actor. Some of us know that he acted in a Ben Johnson play and also in his own plays, but its thought that he is a very busy man, writing, managing the theatre, and commuting between London and Stratford, where his family was, he didn’t undertake big roles. There are evidences that he played the ghost in Hamlet and Adam in As You Like It. Being the most famous writer in the world, Shakespeare left us neither journals nor letters- he left us only poems and his plays. What we know about......

Words: 2780 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Taming of the Shrew

...Katherina – Shrew or Not So Shrew? According to Merriam-Webster (n.d.), a shrew can be defined as an unpleasant, bad-tempered woman. From the moment we are introduced to Katherina in Act I, Scene I, we see that she lives up to her reputation as a shrew through her exchange of words with her father when two suitors, Gremio and Hortensio, come to call upon Bianca for their wife. Baptista tells the two gentlemen not to look at his youngest daughter, before he has a husband for his elder daughter. He asks the gentlemen if either of them love Katherina. Gremio states “To cart her rather. She’s too rough for me.” (Shakespeare, trans. 2009, 1.1.55-56). Katherina sharply responds to her father: “I pray you, sir, it is your will to make a stale of me amongst these mates?” (Shakespeare, trans. 2009, 1.1.57-58). Hortensio responds by stating; “Mates, maid? How mean you that? No mates for you unless you were of gentler, milder mold.” (Shakespeare, trans. 2009, 1.1.59-60). Kate quickly responds to his harsh criticism by stating “I’faith sir, you shall never need to fear; iwis it is not halfway to her heart. But if it were, doubt not her care should be to comb your noddle with a three-legged stool and paint your face, and use you like a fool.” (Shakespeare, trans. 2009, 1.1.60-65), and in the movie throws a stool down at him. This is our first indication that Katherina is not the usual woman of this time period. As the play and movie progresses, we see that Katherina is a......

Words: 1648 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

George Orwell Analysis

...George Orwell’s political views have been developed throughout his life based on personal experiences, although some may argue Orwell had no political label, due to his many different facets and aspects. Orwell witnessed Stalin’s Soviet Russia, the dictatorships of Mussolini and Hitler, the Spanish civil war and World War 2. Orwell’s literary works such as 1984 and many others, touch on aspects of imperialism, anarchism, socialism, Nazism, capitalism and totalitarianism. “The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical” in 1984, is a text within a text that Winston reads to understand many things about the totalitarian world he lives in. The purpose of the text within a text is to parallel the corrupt socialist world of 1984 with that of Stalin’s USSR, expand on Orwell’s ideas of imperialism, and to sound an alarm to warn readers of what a worst case scenario totalitarian world could be like. Firstly, “The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical” was to provide greater insight, for Winston and the reader. Goldstein’s text takes apart each section of the party’s slogan “War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is strength” (Orwell, 1), and explains what they mean to the party. After reading the text, Winston learned some new things, but the text mostly just reinforced things he already assumed or knew. Secondly, when thinking from a political standpoint, one could say that the point of this text within a text was to parallel the corrupt socialist world of 1984 with that of Stalin’s......

Words: 791 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ten Things I Hate About You and the Taming of the Shrew Notes

...Hate About You and Taming of the Shrew Summary: Examines the effect of social and cultural constraints on characters in Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare and Ten Things I Hate About You, a film based on the bard's play. ________________________________________ The story of The Taming of the Shrew is one that raises important issues both in the Shakespearean text and in the modern appropriation 10 Things I Hate About You. How does each composer's use of this story reflect the time in which each was composed" The Taming of the Shrew was written in the Elizabethan Era in England at a time when men were considered to be superior to women. The patriarchal society of this time is reflected to a large extent in the text and various implications of traditional values can be noted. The modern appropriation, Ten Things I Hate About You, goes along the same story line however it is quite evident that the different context has a significant impact upon the content. The most obvious indicator of the type of society is given through the medium that each text is presented in. The Taming of the Shrew is a play and was staged for audiences during the early 17th century. The fact that Shakespeare chose to write a play rather than, say, a comic strip or screenplay, indicated that it was the most popular form of entertainment at the time. The best way for Shakespeare to have his work known was through the most popular form of entertainment. The language of the text is another......

Words: 1958 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Compare and Contrast - to Room Nineteen & Cathedral

...In both Doris Lessing’s “To Room Nineteen” and Raymond Carver’s “Cathedral”, the protagonists exhibit a kind of selfishness. Although they share this similarity, they present their selfishness in different ways, and ultimately make very different life decisions based upon this. The Rawling family had “everything right, appropriate, and what everyone would wish for, if they could choose.” The husband and wife, Matthew and Susan, had a picture-perfect marriage, “…people to whom others came for advice.” Despite this, Susan felt a “certain flatness.” She was endlessly looking forward to the day when their twins would go off to school for the first time, and then all the children would be “off her hands.” When this day came, however, she then resented every moment when they were home, especially during the holidays. This eventually led her to spiral out of control, constantly in search of perfect solitude. Even while taking a walking holiday in Wales, she felt as though “the telephone wire [was] holding to her duty like a leash.” (p. 880). .” Abandoning her family altogether, she discovers a dingy hotel. In Room Nineteen she would sit in the armchair for hours, selfishly enjoying her solitude. “To Room Nineteen” ends as Susan commits the selfish act of suicide, deserting her family once and for all. The protagonist in “Cathedral” displayed clear ignorance throughout a large portion of the short story, and it was especially easy to focus on due to the author’s use of first......

Words: 734 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Compare and Contrast the Theme of Control in the Handmaids Tale and Nineteen Eighty-Four

...Compare and contrast the theme of control in The Handmaids Tale and Nineteen Eighty-Four Control is a central theme in both dystopian texts and control is present in both novels. Both societies in the novels are heavily controlled and restricted, but the key difference is in the regime used by the respective governments in each text. In The Handmaids Tale the government’s ideologies are theosophical whereas Nineteen Eighty-Four is based on socialism. These ideologies play a key role in the ways that control is presented in each novel. The governments use different forms of control to maintain their regimes and power and these include: indoctrination through control of hierarchy, language and religion. The governments act as totalitarian regimes which constantly monitor the lives of its citizens to keep them under their control. Orwell took inspiration from the plight of Britain during the time the novel was written; 1948. Britain had just come out of a horrifying war that devastated the world - World War Two - and her economy and overseas relations were in deep water. Britain’s economy was at its lowest in decades and very unstable; her Empire was dissolving in to the common wealth and international relations were quickly turning sour. Similarly to The Handmaids Tale, Nineteen Eighty-Four warns against governments’ overwhelming acquirement of power. Orwell himself was well-versed in the world of politics and strategies deployed by governments to gain control. He was also a......

Words: 2713 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Taming of the Shrew Papaer

...the origin of comedic form. At first William Shakespeare’s play, The Taming of the Shrew seems to have a clear message that the green world theory does not define the structure of the play and that Petruchio tames Katherine. While this could be an interpretation of the play, I find it unlikely that this is the case. The analysis of the film, 10 Things I Hate About You, opens the door visually to see the green world theory in action, which allows the reader to appreciate The Taming of the Shrew as a comedy as well as reinterpret its conclusion. The green world theory is the structural backbone of The Taming of the Shrew, and commands that Katherine and Petruchio change over the course of the play and ultimately both are tamed. The green world theory can be seen in 10 Things by analyzing Frye’s key elements of comedy, such as form, character type, and repetition. The movie opens in an old society where Kat and Bianca’s father, who plays the role of the senex (as Frye suggests, a character in charge of the plays society) and strictly controls the environment in a way that is not fitting for the time period (Frye 171). He does not allow either of his daughters to date, and this becomes a problem for the young men interested in dating Bianca. The plot is propelled in the green world when the father, or the senex, decides to make a new rule allowing Bianca to date as soon as Kat dates, which he believes will never happen due to Kat’s repetitive shrew-like behavior (Junger). While......

Words: 1841 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

How Have the Composers of ‘Metropolis’ and ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four’ Reflected or Challenged the Values of the Times in Which They Lived?

...Through the texts ‘Metropolis’ and ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’, Fritz Lang and George Orwell the composers both reflect as well as challenge the values within the times which they lived. The historical context of Metropolis challenges the values of the time in which Lang lived while the historical context of Nineteen Eight-Four reflects the values of the time Orwell lived. Values such as humanism, personal choice, liberty and family values are challenged through both Metropolis and Nineteen Eighty-Four. These are just some of the values of the time in which Lang and Orwell lived. Metropolis is a silent black-and-white film directed by Fritz Lang which challenged the values of humanity and personal choice through the historical context of the film. This film was made in a time which was ‘between the wars’, it was made in a time where German society was under the Weimar Republic, a system of parliamentary democracy formed after WWII. People residing in Germany would also go to the cinema to not only watch a film but to also escape from the hardships of their daily life. Within the era where Germany was under the Weimar Republic rule until Nazis rose to power, leading to the Treaty of Versailles where Germany agreed to be guilty of beginning the war and also to pay for all compensations. This agreement led to a Great Depression which hit the Republic hard and in the early 1930s allowed Hitler to rise up along with the Nazi party. Within Europe there was a period filled with......

Words: 1285 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Taming of the Shrew

...Skyler Conklin Dr. Boecherer 04/09/15 The Taming of the Shrew The concept of someone telling you are something that you are not is one thing and the chances of you believing them right away are not very high. But if that person repeatedly tells you enough times that you are one thing, you will begin question yourself and eventually believe that it is reality. The idea of appearance in The Taming of the Shrew is performed with the same idea. Focusing on the essence of appearance, Shakespeare uses the story of Christopher Sly’s taming and its correlatives, and Kate’s taming to show that appearance becomes reality. Eventually, the characters in The Taming of the Shrew obscure the lines between reality and illusion, making them the same. In the beginning of the play, the induction with Christopher Sly shows the phenomenon of illusion becoming reality with the help of appearance. A rich lord kidnaps Sly, a drunken beggar, and decided to play a trick on him. “Sirs, I will practice on this drunken man. What think you, if he were conveyed to bed, Wrapped in sweet clothes, rings put upon his fingers, A most delicious banquet by his bed, And brave attendants near him when he wakes, Would not the beggar then forget himself?”(Ind.1.36-41). When Sly awakens in an unfamiliar setting, he begins to question the truth of his circumstance, but after a while, Sly he begins to accept the illusion that he is the lord he appears to be. “Upon my life, I am a lord indeed, And not a......

Words: 1246 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit and Jane Eyre

...Female relationships have been a topic that has intrigued both male and female writers throughout the ages. All three of my chosen texts explore these relationships differently; Jane Eyre’s close friendship with Helen, Jeanette’s amorous tryst with Melanie and the apparent hatred between Tamora and Lavinia. In order to understand these relationships I am going to analyse the way in which the writer approaches them. Oranges are not the only fruit, written by Jeanette Winterson, is a bildungsroman that follows a girl who decides that she can be a Christian despite her admitting she is a lesbian. This causes uproar at home and in church as her highly religious mother regards this as a sin. Jeanette explains that after she told her mother they ‘hardly spoke[n]’ and she later describes her mother to have ‘vacantly passed [her] a plate of biscuits.’ Winterson’s use of the word ‘vacant’ to show the lack of emotion Jeanette’s mother has for her as a result of this confession. She does not hate her but she is unable to show her any feelings, not your conventional mother-daughter relationship. However it hasn’t always been this way, at the beginning of the novel Jeanette looks to her mother as her idol, her heroine and they have an amazing relationship. Jeanette describes an event in which they sing hymns together she says her ‘Mother sang the tune and [she] put in the harmonies’ Although this is true literally, I think this could also be interpreted metaphorically in that without......

Words: 664 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ways in Which William Shakespeare Shows Sympathy and Dislike for Macbeth

...In this essay, I will be looking at ways in which William Shakespeare shows sympathy and dislike for Macbeth. I will refer to historical context as well as the play on a whole. The play Macbeth which was set in Scotland, was written by William Shakespeare in the early 1600’s. This play was a tragedy and was written for King James I a year after the gunpowder plot. The play was to some extent a tale to caution any potential killers of the king (regicides) as to what would happen to them if they attempted to blow up King James and his parliament as Guy Fawkes did. Macbeth starts out as a very brave warrior. On his way back from fighting the Norwegians he encountered the three witches who told him that he would become king and Thane of Cawdor. Upon his return the first part of the prophecy came true. Macbeth informs his wife of the predictions and she tries to persuade him to kill Duncan. Macbeth yields to temptation and becomes very heartless killing everyone in his path so that he could become king. He became king and eventually died when he was defeated in war against Macduff. We first feel sympathy for Macbeth in Act 1 Scene 7. In this scene, his wife, Lady Macbeth, persuades him to kill King Duncan in order to fulfil the second part of the witches’ prophecy. Macbeth considers reasons why he should not kill King Duncan. Evidence of this is in Macbeth’s soliloquy, and i quote” First, as I am his kinsman and his subject, Strong both against the deed; then, as his......

Words: 697 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Review for Taming of the Shrew

...BBC adaptation of ‘Taming of the Shrew’ Sally Wainwright’s updated adaptation of this classic Shakespeare play was ingeniously done from beginning to end, reflecting the significant social change brought about by a new surge of feminism. Although it has been significantly modernised to assimilate the modern audience of the twenty-first century, it still keeps the authenticity of the original play so Shakespeare lovers are able to enjoy it as well as a new, younger generation. When adapting classic plays to appeal to a modern audience, things can quite often go wrong and come across as clichéd, however in the ‘Taming of the Shrew’ it was expertly done. Wainwright managed to capture the true spirit of Shakespeare’s original play effortlessly, including plenty of dramatic scenes throughout leaving the audience feeling sufficiently satisfied. One scene in particular which stood out for me was the honeymoon scene where Kate is stranded with Petruchio in a secluded villa right out in the countryside. The mix of sexual tension between Kate and Petruchio plus the frustration and anger creates a very heated atmosphere as well as a strong and powerful scene as the audience sees Kate’s façade beginning to falter as her truer feelings towards Petruchio start to show. The dark lighting and orange and red tones help aid this scene, enhancing the passion between the two and enabling the audience to feel the sexual desire. Widely loved actress Shirley Henderson, known to many as......

Words: 572 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

George Orwell - 1984

...Nineteen Eighty-Four (or 1984) is an English dystopian novel by George Orwell, written in 1948 and published in 1949. It is the story of the life of the intellectual Winston Smith, his job in the Ministry of Truth, and his degradation by the totalitarian government of Oceania, the country in which he lives. It has been translated into sixty-two languages, and has deeply impressed itself in the English language. Nineteen Eighty-Four, its terms and language, and its author are bywords in discussions of personal privacy and state security. The adjective "Orwellian" describes actions and organizations characteristic of Oceania, the totalitarian society depicted in the novel, and the phrase "Big Brother is watching you" refers to invasive surveillance. In turn, Nineteen Eighty-Four has been seen as subversive and politically dangerous and thus been banned by libraries in many countries.[1] Along with Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley, and Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, it is among the most famous dystopias in literature.[2] In 2005, Time magazine selected it as one of the 100 best English-language novels since 1923. Probably the most important thing to remember while reading 1984 is that Orwell never intended the book to be a prediction of the future. It was more or less a satire of political fiction, however, I believe Orwell was on the right track concerning future possibilities of a New World Order, or total government control. An interesting quotation from the book is......

Words: 951 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Taming of the Shrew

...once said, “It’s not what an author says, but what he or she whispers that is important”. To me, this quote means that it’s not what’s written directly in front of you in the novel, but the hidden meaning throughout the story that is very essential and important. I believe that this quotation by Smith is agreeable because of the reason that when authors are writing their novels they always have a deeper and more significant meaning added to it to provide a lasting thought or idea that could be impactful to someones life in the future. Two works of literature that support this quote by Logan Pearsall Smith is The Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare and “Everyday Use” by Alice Walker. Both works of literature use the literary element of theme in their stories that help support the quote by Smith. In the play The Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare, he uses the literary element of theme to help support the quote. One theme in particular that Shakespeare uses in his play is the transformation of characters throughout the story. For example, the quote from act five, scene two, “Now, fair befal thee, good Petruchio! The wager thou hast won; and I will add Unto their losses twenty thousand crowns; Another dowry to another daughter, For she is changed, as she had never been” by Babtista clearly illustrates how the theme of disguises is being used by the playwriter. Baptista describes Kate's outward transformation from shrew to ideal wife as......

Words: 842 - Pages: 4