Premium Essay

Comparing Roark And Toohey's The Fountainhead

Submitted By
Words 1374
Pages 6
Howard Roark and Ellsworth Toohey are declared in The Fountainhead where they both exclaim prime illustrations of a realistic perspective. Specifically, Roark is the hidden side of society that is obsolete, and hard to understand that is actually among realization. Evidently, Roark is an exemplar of the "individual" that is truly successful for his talents, reason, drive, and inner beliefs: " they were sketches of buildings such as had never stood on the face of the earth."-(7). Roark absorbs his art impression into buildings and architecture. His artistic view is quite unorthodox that is questioned. Society's view on abstract structure is irrelevant to Roark's behavior. He avoids any temptation of conformity to commit to his personal …show more content…
He preaches society with the most deceitful acts to succeed. In terms of the collected society, he embodies everything corrupt and evil that encapsulates mankind. He is the direct opposite of the main character. Roark's personality is entirely based on his complete rectitude to others. He never attempts to triumph over friends or the supremacy of exploiting people to effectuate embellished objective. Toohey's degrading behavior is a diametrical reflection to Roark's humanitarianism. Toohey doesn't own any absolute talent in regards to his knowledgeable talent that is manipulation. He uses his endowing of manipulation and subduing of the public to create a sector of success for him. A great disparity to Toohey, Roark's beliefs perceive the rational, actuality of hard work and determining what is true happiness and how to reach it. Furthermore, Reaching one's true happiness is the central force of objectivism. Roark is a strong, capable person minded to do just about anything to achieve his design. Ellsworth learned the basics of manipulation as a child, and mastered it by the time he graduated college. Even from a child, there is a showing of need of power at such a young age. His lack of talent allows him to use manipulation to be successful by making people feel small and insignificant. Based on morality, he is successful in a society where greed thrives, and charity is the only weapon. …show more content…
Roark, we’re alone here. Why don’t you tell me what you think of me?” To which Roark replies, “But I don’t think of you.”The range of Toohey’s enmity becomes increasingly apparent near the end of part two. Howard Roark poses an act of dominance to Toohey where he fears it: "you are dangerous."-(15). Essentially, Roark issues a threat to many people pertaining"men hate passion, any great passion."-(35). Roark's behavior connects precisely to the essence of the matter: the importance of reason. Roark shows, an excessive amount of indifference to his response to Toohey. His indifference didn't persuade hatred or friendliness which provoked an ambiguous response. Above all, the theme convinces the issue to be the product of reason and logic with digression with emotion. Roark, whom is expressive to his individualistic principle casts logical standards without any emotional desire. It breaks out a substantial intellectual side of the characters and novel's ideals. Sentimentalities should be replaced with practicality instead. This resembles the conflicting response, because Roark is quite apathetic to his reply. Considering why Roark is lukewarm has to do with the principality of the other relating theme where man should be true to himself and express the philosophy of individualism. More importantly, Toohey is recognized as the deeming society that overrules Roark; that is how he appears symbolically. Roark examines society, and determines the ideology of how it will

Similar Documents