Premium Essay

Con Side of Debate Summary

In: Business and Management

Submitted By elyking
Words 511
Pages 3
Con Side of Debate Summary
Should enhanced interrogation be used to protect the citizens of the United States? The answer is no. The following is a summary of the debate our team engaged in to include key points and data to support our argument. Communication Process and Effectiveness
As in previous team discussions, the goal right out of the gate was to understand the objective, initiate debate and set an obtainable suspense for completion.
I initiated the debate on the first day by proposing we start the discussion as soon as possible and set a deadline of Friday at 5:00pm to conclude debate. I also laid out several pros to enhanced interrogation such as the successful interrogations of Khalid Sheik Mohammad, the ticking time bomb situation and why terrorists deserve it. I also included the evil they do and would do, and made comparisons to how the terrorist’s treat their prisoners. (Messerli, 2012). The team members who responded right away concurred with the Friday deadline, and we began to comment on the five pros identified. Key Points and Supporting Arguments
From the main pros discussed, our team primarily focused on three points. First, everyone agreed that just asking the terrorists nicely won’t work. In addition, enhanced interrogation is justified if it will stop another terrorist attack and/or save the lives of Americans; especially if it was a ticking time bomb scenario. Second, our team felt that in these cases we are dealing with pure evil; given the opportunity, these terrorists would kill every American without mercy. So in other words, we are not interrogating to punish an enemy of the state or political prisoner or to control the population through fear; we do it to the worst of the worst to save lives. Third, our team agreed that a little bit of simulated drowning or sleep

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Con Side Debate Summary

...Con Side Debate Summary Devin Smith 12/22/14 Steven Boylan This week for the week four learning team collaborative discussion the debate for the con side of the debate was discussed between Pamela Core and me. I started by saying how I felt about the con side and saying if I was con which means I would not want high school students to wear uniforms. My arguments would be that wearing uniforms, I could restrict students from their freedom of expression, meaning that students could loose their constitutional rights of speech and expression when entering the school doors. School uniforms promote everyone to be alike instead of promoting individuality meaning at a time when schools are encouraging an appreciation of diversity, enforcing standardized dress sends a contradictory message. Most public schools that has uniforms are place are in bad economic neighborhoods take away from the real issues at school. Meaning most public schools with uniform policies are in poor neighborhoods, emphasizing the class distinctions that uniforms were supposed to eliminate. Uniforms have an effect on self-image I believe when students have to wear the same outfits, rather than being allowed to select clothes that suit their body types, they can suffer embarrassment at school. Also students would rather not have uniforms. Pamela then began to explain her side and said that what I said is true. They are also very popular in private and Catholic Schools so the environment could be a perception...

Words: 534 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Con Side of Debate Summary

...Con Side of Debate Summary Jorge Vega BCOM/125 March 26, 2015 John Kungis Common Core “Common Core government agencies will gather and store all sorts of private information on every schoolchild into a longitudinal database from birth through all levels of schooling, plus giving government the right to share and exchange this nosy [sic] information with other government and private agencies, thus negating the federal law that now prohibits that. This is what CC is; a type of surveillance and control of individual.” (Schlafly, 2013) Con Side of Debate Summary As a nation, we have trusted our government to make changes to the citizens voting rights. Where is that now how much does our vote really count? In this case Common Core was not introduce to the public schools to vote as a standard curriculum. Meaning of common core is control of the school curriculum, i.e. control by Obama administration bureaucrats. Curriculum decisions will be replaced by the Federal curriculum decisions by state and local school boards, state legislatures, parents and even Congress because Obama bypassed congress by using $4 billion of Stimulus money to promote CC. I believe that this structure is all about the money, not about having the correct tools for teaching, instructing, and guiding the student. Currently, each state sets its own standards. This has led to a nation with 50 sets of inconsistent standards, even though the expectations of colleges and employers in math and English are...

Words: 957 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Debate Topic Summary Discussion

...Debate Topic Discussion Summary Amy F. Italiano BCOM/275 Thursday, January 22, 2015 Joe Monroe, MA Debate Topic Discussion Summary Discussion, debates, arguments are all methods of looking at a subject or an issue to reveal its real essence and the varying points of view there are. We can see the debate from several positions. The first position is clarification and problem-solving. This position has an objective to see the problem and find a viable solution. However, to see the complete picture of any given topic one must enter into a discussion with not only understanding their opinion, but a willingness to see the opposite perspective. If we can do this we perhaps, find a third less obvious avenue to travel and quite possibly a better way to come to a conclusion. Another position, that can be used, is the question of whether or not you can win or lose a debate. The arguments and persuasive facts may compel some to switch sides, but if in the end you remain in the position then was winning or losing really achieved? A third position is that debates often seem to not only continue the fight or tension between opinions but fuel them to a deeper level making it harder to find a solution. Profiling The discussion topic, we are posing, is, "Should profiling be used as an accepted means to achieve the desired result”? Rationale for Discussion Topic Each member of Team C came up with two possible topics of discussion...

Words: 604 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Team Paper

...Con Side Debate Summary Brittany Brock BCOM/275 January 15, 2014 Andrea Benjamin Should Welfare Recipients Be Drug Tested? Learning Team A had a discussion regarding welfare recipients. Should welfare recipients be drug tested? In view of the fact that every individual is entitled to their opinion, this discussion turned out to be a majestic debate. Some were against this while some were for it. Con Side of Debate There is a con side to this debate. Previously, part of learning team A felt that welfare recipients should be drug tested while some felt that they should not be drug tested. The con side of this debate has a little truth and a few logical points to the opinion stated as to why recipients should not be drug tested. Although Americans are drug tested for employment, applicants who apply for welfare should not be drug tested for government assistance. Why? Many feel that drug testing is unnecessary. By requesting a drug test, this can cause a conflict with society, which some people may think they are being stereotyped by the government. Some individuals felt that drug testing would be a huge hassle. This takes up a lot time. Drug testing for welfare approval can also be controversial because although you take a drug test prior to getting approved; recipients may decide to participate in drug use right after. Individuals could even try to get others to take their drug test. Individuals will other others applying for them...

Words: 354 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Con-Side of Debate

...Con-Side of Debate Summary John Jones BCOM/275 10/19/14 Lynda Sohl Con-side of Team “A” Debate The first week of our discussion topic, there were many different and valuable point of views that were expressed. This week we were to only look at the Con-side of the discussion and see what the general consensus of our topic was. As a team we compared the facts of how bad war really is. War can cause bitterness and hatred to one another, but also divide people socially and economically. Being that this is the Con-side discussion our team made great points and really made war look the way it should, evil, miserable, and disgusting. In our pro-side discussion we mentioned that war brought certain things to a country such as money, power, and freedom. When a war is started certain things need to fall in place to maintain economic stability, the first being that the overall population stands behind you. This not only generates enough financial and political prowesses, but establishes the strength of the overall country. We have compared a few countries to one another and America is by far the greatest at achieving this goal of “Country Support”. On the other hand in this week’s discussion war can also be the demise of a country. For example when Nazi Germany seemed to expand across Europe they spread propaganda and fear in their own country. This caused their money to only go to military purposes...

Words: 648 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Universal Healthcare

...of the public has been following the 2010 health reform debate closely. Despite this, more than half (56 percent) of Americans think health reform is more important than ever. Very smart people are zoning out of the health care reform debate because they think it’s just too complicated. The complexities of US health reform are a problem, because American citizens and politicians cannot make good decisions about an issue they do not clearly understand or have been misinformed. Defining the goals of reform is relatively easy. Implementing them is tough and that’s where people are made to feel stupid - partly by special interest groups who intentionally or unintentionally confuse the debate. According to John Lapook in an article posted on CBS News.com, at least one senator admits he has no intention of reading it. "I don't expect to actually read the legislative language because . . . the legislative language is among the more confusing things I've ever read in my life," Sen. Thomas Carper (D-Del.) quotes to online news service in the article. Carper told CBSnews.com that the bill was "incomprehensible" and "hard stuff to understand. Carper stated he doubts his fellow members of the Senate Finance Committee will read their handiwork either. The article states that the committee is drafting a summary of the awkwardly worded bill, which is aimed at providing affordable health insurance to all Americans. The summary would put the legislation in plain language for the public...

Words: 1130 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Al; Kshdf

...Debate Summary Amanda Missick, Karla Castillo, Kimberly Archuleta, and Kimberly Arzate BCOM 275 April 2, 2015 John Kungis Debate Summary Throughout the debate we chose to discuss the Chris Kyle murder case where Eddie Routh was convicted for the brutal murder of Chris Kyle, former Navy Seal, and his comrade Chad Littlefield. As the debate summary we decided to go with the pro side of the argument, which includes; Eddie Routh's history of mental disorders, how he fled the scene, and the sentence given to him for his murder charge. Not only did this topic make us have different opinions amongst each other, but made us open our minds to different views. Even though as a team we had our disagreements and different believes on the topic, we came together for the final decision of the debate. We believed that the murder trial of Chris Kyle was justly sentenced. Even though Eddie was facing a low point in his life we believe his alcohol abuse, violent behavior and strange conduct were contributing factors that led to his mental state. Living in a city with one of the biggest military bases in the country, we all in different ways are related to military personnel. Some of us personally know veterans with PTSD. It was discussed during our meetings that it normally takes more than a shooting range to trigger someone to relive those experiences that only veterans have experienced. We are devastated that this incident turned out the way it did, ending the life of not only the...

Words: 618 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Cons Side of Medical Marijuana

...Con Side of Debate Summary BCOM/275 - Business Communications and Critical Thinking December 4th, 2014. Willetra Brittian Con Side of Debate Summary Medical Cannabis use is a controversial topic for many people, despite its multiple benefits; people against its medical use will find the way to prohibit it in the United States. Individuals against medical cannabis have concerns regarding its risk in the immune system, pulmonary problems, hormones, mental health, and the risk of bacterial, fungus, or viral infection (National Academy of Science, 1999). Even though any patient has not confirmed this hypothesis, Scientifics investigation suggested that cannabis has no significant good or bad side effects. In addition, the use of marijuana has been shown to have a short term effect on the ability of people to think, learn, reason ad perform tasks. It is not clear if cannabis has any long term effect on the mental state or mood (Post Media News, 2011). Marijuana effects are related with drowsiness, dry mouth, and headache; can impair psychomotor skills. HIV patients are the largest group who report using marijuana for medical purposes. Medical marijuana and its active ingredient THC have been shown in some studies to decrease immune function risk of progression to AIDS in HIV-cero positive patients and to increased mortality in AIDS patients (Kebler & Dupont, 2012). Prescribe in high amounts can increase risk of heart attack within one hour of use. Medical marijuana is not...

Words: 865 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Bcom275

...Pro Side of Debate Summary Team B Annetta Brent, Gloria Sample BCOM/275 February 6, 2015 Andre Samuel, Ph.D. Pro Side of Debate Summary Pro side of the appropriate age to give a child a cell phone There are not many pros when it comes to thinking about purchasing a cell phone for your child. As stated before, some parents consider cell phones for their young children as essential tools for staying in touch and keeping that line of communication open ,some parents give their children cell phones for other reasons. According to, Brayer (2013), “children nowadays get bullied for not “keeping up with the Jonses”. Statistics show that almost 90% of teenagers own a cell phone. It’s easy to imagine a teen not calling a friend because they’re afraid that the friend’s dad will answer the phone. Not having a cell phone can make a child an outcast at school. If your child does have a cell phone, but not a nifty phone case, he might get some flak for it. Whether you like it or not, children can be mean and judgmental”. Gloria and I feel that the best age to give a child a cell phone is at the age of sixteen. For some, at that age a level of maturity should kick in. Some will take the responsibility of having a cell phone as a serious deal and some will not. As kids of the “old school era” some of the parents back then could not afford cell phones for themselves not to mention trying to purchase cell phones for a house full of kids and as kids back then we dare not ask...

Words: 438 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Performance Management

...Individual and Team Case Analysis Template Case: Name(s): |Situation analysis | |Social environment- By the time Roussel- Uclaf was determining what action to take in the US, both the pro-choice and pro-life | |sides of the debate were very vocal in their opinions, though it seems that the pro-life side was more vocal in their opposition | |(at least in the earlier stages). | |Political Environment- The United States had just had 2 Republican Presidents who were staunchly anti-abortion. However, President | |Clinton was elected in 1992 and was much more liberal concerning abortion, and appointed more liberal people into regulatory | |positions (specifically, the FDA). | |Company/Organizational Environment- There are two levels at issue here. One is between the individual employees at each | |organizational level, and the other is between the parent company, Hoechst, and Roussel-Uclaf. Within each level of the | |organization, different employees at different management levels have differing opinions on abortion, which results in often | |oppositional opinions on RU-486. Also, at the different corporation levels (e.g. Hoechst...

Words: 802 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Con Side of Debate

...Con Side of Debate Summary As discussed on the pro side of my team’s debate about police officers wearing a body camera at all times, as we find ourselves going back in time with the racial tensions growing ever higher in America. My team and I have debated the arming of police officers with body camera’s, although there were many positive points to this action there are just as many negative points that could draw concern and force future studies before deciding this is for sure the way ahead for our police officers in today’s environment. With all the concerns one of the biggest that we all tended to agree on is the human factor, when the police are armed with a body camera someone would have to turn it on and turn it off so again if for some reason the officer camera wasn’t working then the argument would be made that the camera was deliberately turned off to hide something. One course of action to counter this was suggested that it would be like a time clock when the officer came on duty someone would key the camera on and then it wouldn’t be turned off until the end of the shift. Another concern that would have to be figured out was how here in America it seems we all come up with and have great idea’s but as soon as we are told that our taxes are going up to pay for this then everyone tends to back away from the idea. As we stop and think about most of the major crimes in America it seems most occur in the darkness of the night, so one of the biggest hurdles I think...

Words: 612 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Obamacare

...Analysis of Obamacare Health Policy Anthony E Davis POL201: American National Government Ginger Devine November 25, 2013 Analysis of Obamacare Health Policy One of the most crucial issues of today is the issue of health insurance and availability of quality health services to all residents of the U.S. This paper will analyze the Obamacare Healthcare Policy-highlighting its core elements, health care problem solution, and the policies history. Also it will evaluate the pros and cons using different perspectives in debate. Let’s begin with the elements of Obamacare. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), also called Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act, is a United States federal statute signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010 (ObamaCare Summary: A Summary of Obama's Health Care Reform, 2013). Since the establishment of Medicaid and Medicare of 1965, Obamacare is one of the most significant expansions from the government and administrative overhaul of the U.S healthcare system. The purpose of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is to raise the rate of health coverage of Americans, to modernize the delivery of health care services, and to reduce the overall costs of health care. This is to be done by restricting certain insurance company practices and providing tax credits and subsidies for individuals and businesses. Prior to the approval of the Obamacare Policy, the American health care industry was in deep...

Words: 1743 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Dna Replica

...thoroughly. Criminal defense attorneys may not believe their client is innocent, but it is their job to defend that person to the best of their ability. Step 2: Tips on Formulating Your Argument Think, Think, Think. Ask yourself lots of questions about each side of the topic, and then answer them through research, your opinion, and your experiences with both sides of the argument. One helpful tip for doing this is creating a pro and con list for each argument. What are the good qualities of each? What are the bad qualities? Why is each method used in the course? What is the history of each? How is each method helpful in understanding Geometry? Be sure to document all of your sources. You will be asked to provide a list later. Be sure to follow the guidelines and safety precautions for completing Internet searches. Think from the other side. It is impossible to refute, or prove false, someone’s claim if you don’t know what he or she is thinking ahead of time. For example, if a defense attorney knows the prosecution has fingerprints, the defense can find a way to justify why they were there. Create a list of some sort that helps you organize your thoughts. Many debaters use index cards that they can easily pull during a debate. The more organized you are, the more...

Words: 1208 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Should Gambling Be Legalized?

...Introduction: Overview and Summary Statements Unemployment is at and all time high, we hear daily reports about diminishing state revenues. In the face of this tough economic news elected officials have come up with new and some old recycled solutions to feed our hungry revenue nation. The most common idea that gets debated upon is whether or not we should roll the dice and legalize gambling as a revenue winner. The advocates view on legalizing gambling point out that its productive way to bring in new jobs, a first class, environmentally friendly resorts, and a steady long term revenue stream for the state and several towns. On the flip side critic our set on the belief that legalizing gambling is going to strike back at the people and their homes creating addictive gamblers, crime level will sky rocket and local business will suffer from the new change. The Voice of the Pro Advocates Why is gambling being so frowned upon by critics? The present movement to legalize gambling which got under way in 1960 is still making some gain, but has however become greatly unpopular, and has slowed down! Although some short of gambling is legal in all but two states (Hawaii and Utah) why does it continue to be denounced? One reason that keeps pooping up, is critics feel the right to label it as being “unproductive” and therefore wasteful, but what is productive then? Back in the early 18th century one early view was that only agriculture was productive, and that manufacture was unproductive...

Words: 1446 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Social Media

...Social Media by Erma LaFleur SOC1000 Intro to Human Society Capella University March 9, 2014 Problem Definition Over time, our lives are being consumed with Social networking. Is Social networking creating a safe environment or creating chaos? Some of the social networking sites have caused people to lose their identity, predators have lured children away from home, but yet some people have reunited with friends and family, and are able to communicate with them on a daily bases. Networking sites like YouTube has created a marketing environment as well as education. LinkedIn, has helped to create more jobs and recruiting, while Facebook has helped people stay in touch with each other. Emails and texting have replaced extra phone calls. Ideologies and Cultural Patterns Facebook, a tool for people to communicate, has over 1.4 billion users, YouTube has 490 million user per month and Twitter has 190 million tweets per day. These facts show just how much society is communicating through social networking sites. News spreads faster through these sites but can also give false information just as fast. There are problems that have become a social issue such as cyberbullying and security attacks. “49.5% of students reported being the victims of bullying online and 33.7% reported committing bullying behavior online. 800,000 minors were harassed or cyberbullied on Facebook according to a June 2012 Consumer Reports survey (PR, N., 2012)”. Adults are also victims of...

Words: 901 - Pages: 4