Premium Essay

Creating Conflicts In Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game

Submitted By
Words 655
Pages 3
Setting and its Conflicts
Settings create conflicts in the real world and in books. In the stories “The Sniper” a short story by Liam O’Flaherty and “The Most Dangerous Game” a short story by Richard Connell the settings create conflict for the characters. “The Sniper” takes place in Dublin, Ireland during a civil war. The main character, a Republican sniper, encounters a sniper who is a Free Stater who traps him on a rooftop. “The Most Dangerous Game” takes place on an island in the Caribbean called Ship-Trap Island. The main character is Sanger Rainsford a hunter, when he falls off his ship he swims to Ship-Trap Island. There he meets General Zaroff a hunter who takes the game way too far. Rainsford finds out that the General hunts humans in the island and that he will be the next to be hunted. In both short stories, the setting creates conflicts for the characters throughout the story. In “The Sniper” the setting creates many conflicts throughout the story. One is when …show more content…
The narrator says, “The enemy on the opposite side covered his escape. He must kill that enemy and he could not use his rifle” (113). This quote is an example of how the setting creates a conflict for the main character. The sniper is trapped on the roof because the setting is in enemy territory. Another example of conflicts caused by the setting is in the end when the Republican sniper decides to ID the sniper that he killed. The narrator explains, “ Then the sniper turned over the dead body and looked into his brother’s face” (114). This quote shows how the setting of a civil war caused the sniper to shoot his brother. This is because the snipers family was split over the civil war and fought for different sides. These examples show how the setting creates large conflicts for the main

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Fiction Essay

...Rainsford in “The Most Dangerous Game” by Connell, 2014, and T from “The Destructors” Greene, 2014, feel the need to morally adjust their beliefs for a greater purpose. Connell and Greene, showed that when a person is faced to live with an outcome of a situation, it can shake and alter a person’s principles. The key points that the authors reveal in their work is for Rainsford; although he was in disbelief and shocked at the game General Zaroff created, he felt that he was forced to create a plan that would save him from defeat in “The Most Dangerous Game”. T on the other hand felt that Old Misery’s home should not survive in representation of defeat of the bombs that sent so many families from his town underground into the subways and that had lost so much (Greene, 2014). The influences of life and circumstances may alter a person’s belief and decisions for a greater purpose in life for themselves and others. Keywords: beliefs, morals, principles, adjustments Do individual’s moral standards and boundaries alter according to the severity of a situation or their own interpretation of a situation? Rainsford in Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” and Trevor (also known as T) in Graham Greene’s “The Destructors” are faced to question their morals. This relates to Rainsford’s act on the need for survival and T’s belief that the right thing to do for everyone is to demolish what was left from the bombs that attacked their town. Conflict Compare. Rainsford...

Words: 2046 - Pages: 9