Crime Theories

In: Science

Submitted By prayer
Words 317
Pages 2
The biological theory focuses on the way that we are designed according to our genetics. This theory believes that mind and body go hand in hand. This theory takes neither cognitive processes or the environment into consideration.

Neighborhood Watch programs takes account for reports regarding deviant behavior as well as those about crime. Neighborhood Watch increases the cost of crime due to the fact the price for committing crime is higher now than it was in the past. The biological factors help to fore warn crime prevention programs of the crimes that one will commit based on the behavioral patterns of prior offenders.

The rational theory is also known as the rational choice theory of crime. This theory focuses on wanting more than the least of something. It also direct ones attention to the things that are better off in the long run, and not short term. The primary thought of rational choice theory is the choice patterns that people use in communities are impacted greatly due to the fact that they are trying to use their benefit to its full extent for less.
This theory informs individuals on the outcome of what will happen after they have done something. It explains to them the full extent of the crime and punishment.

As it relates to Neighborhood Watch Programs, they hang signs and provide other propaganda intelling the after affects of committing a crime. Example: signs say no to drugs and a person going to jail.
Example: A picture of a person breaking into another persons car and a police car riding behind it. These things help people to make rational decisions.

Stephan Pfohl, Images of Deviance and Social Control: A Sociological History, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1994.

Edwin Pfuhl and Stuart Henry, The Deviance Process, 3rd ed., Aldine de Gruyter, 1993.

2004 Essentials of Sociology: A Down-To-Earth Approach, (5th Ed)…...

Similar Documents

The Theory of Crime Causation

.... Criminologist and other criminal justice scholars have long struggled with the problem of finding away to separate the effects of individual differences from the effects of circumstances or social structurally causes. In conclusion I believe that different people react in different ways and it is very hard to sick people into certain categories without sometimes looking like you are profiling. Each accused has the right to be treated fair and not be place in a certain category because of the environment, parental morals or where they are from. We are all going to fall into different areas of the social theories at different times in our life. There is no right theory. Works cited: - Michael R. Gottfredson, Travis Hirschi; Stanford University Press, Mar 1, 1990 - Social Science - 297 pages - Burton, Velmer S., and Francis T. Cullen. 1992. “The Empirical Status of Strain Theory.” Journal of Crime and Justice 15:1-30.

Words: 986 - Pages: 4


...The theories on crime deterrence and punishment have changed throughout history. Beccaria, Lombroso and Durkheim are three theorists who have changed the way deterrence, punishment and crime generally is viewed within society. This research paper will first explore each of the theorists’ ideas separately. It will then examine the similarities and differences between each theory. Cesare Beccaria, born in 1738, focused on deterrence as the means of crime prevention. Beccaria fits into the Classical School of thinking, and wrote in a time when torture was used regularly to obtain information from people, and where capital punishment could be used for any type of offence. Punishment was based on a retributive means, where the punishment, or harm, given was equal to the harm caused by the perpetrator. In 1764, Beccaria published a book called “On crimes and Punishments”, where he theorised that this approach did not discourage determined criminals from committing crimes. He suggested, however, by taking away their liberty through incarceration that this would deter other would-be criminals not to commit similar crimes, and would also prevent the perpetrator to recommit the crime again. He based this theory on the utilitarian ideals: “the greatest happiness shared by the greatest number” (Beccaria 1764/1994, p. 227). In his book, Beccaria theorised the deterrence to a crime would increase in effectiveness the faster the punishment was delivered. He also argued that the...

Words: 1364 - Pages: 6


...Criminal Justice The act of an individual or individuals when committing a crime and how a society deals with those individuals has changed over time. Crime is a conduct or violation of the criminal to break the laws for which there is no acceptable justification or excuse. Society is often viewed by its criminal element and how the people deal with punishment and rehabilitation of the criminal. There are five goals of the criminal justice system deterrence, incapacitation, retribution, rehabilitation, restoration. In a CJi Interactive Multi-Media slide on University of Phoenix website it described, “These five criminal justice goals are not mutually exclusive. They are really rather like philosophical perspectives from which a community or agency responds to criminal behavior. (Interactive) The criminal justice system has three branches, those branches are police, courts and correction departments, each are an integral part of the American Justice System. The police work in an ever changing environment however in a report on the challenges of crime in a free society the police officers job was described as “the manner in which a policeman works is influenced by practical matters: the legal strength of the available evidence, the willingness of victims to press charges and of witnesses to testify, the temper of the community, the time and information at the policeman's disposal. Much is at stake in how the policeman exercises this discretion and if he judges conduct not...

Words: 1030 - Pages: 5


...Necessity knows no law. Bần cùng sinh đạo tặc. In December 2008, just a few months after the U.S. financial system imploded, New York City was hit by a flurry of bank robberies. On the Monday before New Year’s, four banks were attacked in an hour-and-a-half; one daytime raid took place just steps from the Lincoln Center in downtown Manhattan. The week before, San Diego had seen four bank holdups in a single day. Criminologists wondered if the holiday spree was the first sign of a looming crime wave in recession-battered America. Take an uptick in poverty and economic misery, toss in budget cuts to police departments across the country, and that should be a blueprint for chaos—right? Except, as it turns out, the exact opposite occurred. According to FBI statistics, crime rates went down across the board in 2009. Way down. Murder, rape, robbery, assault, auto theft—plummeted, one and all. Then, this week, the FBI released preliminary data for the first six months of 2010, and again the same pattern emerged. Violent crimes and property crimes alike have been falling in every region of the country. What gives? Have experts just completely misunderstood what causes people to commit crimes?   There's certainly no shortage of theories for why crime rates have gone down over the past two years. The simplest is that crime just isn’t closely related to economic conditions. Consider, after all, the two big crime epidemics in the twentieth century—the first took root in the late...

Words: 10363 - Pages: 42


...How I understood everything on the choice theories and how they relate to crime is it is not the matter the subjective theory that everyone considers. It’s every theory. In every theory can be turn into a crime. It is just depends on how you look in between the lines to see it. Most people don’t see it. I do agree with the criminology theory. But it what other factors can be included to determine the subjective view of choice from media, history, rational involvements. There is always evidence to prove these things but it determines how you look for them. Take the school for example in the media. There have been lots of school shootings over the nation. But conclusively what has been the driven point to lead to them. That’s where the evidence has to come in to play. Which local law enforcement has to piece together from the person who has done it? To the prior evidence before it was done. Such as the question why. Was that person harassed, bullied, etc? Which in my point of view it’s a theory and a puzzle to put together to determine the correct facts to piece it all together. Which determines truth and false. But in every theory in every type of work and in science has to be developed of evidence for it to be considered workable and true. But takes special people to look in between those lines to make it real in reality to get the correct answer....

Words: 253 - Pages: 2


...Assignment 2: Essay Outline (300 words) (10%) You will submit your essay plan (300 words) in Week 5 tutorials. The plan should include how are you planning to answer the question, key issues you will cover, structure of the essay and key arguments you want to present. Your tutor will provide oral feedback in the class. You need to make reasonable attempt at this assessment every week to pass the course. If you fail to do it your final mark will be withheld. 1. Essay Question: After more than a century of criminological theory, why does crime still exist? Illustrate your answer by drawing on at least two theories studied thus far in the semester and consider how they define crime and what policy ( rulem strategy, procedure) responses (replies) they advocate (support). What are the strengths and weaknesses of these theories and why related policy responses failed to rid society ( culture of crime? Use Australian or international examples to support your arguments. a. Thesis Statement: * Crime attributes an individual to a particularly undesirable group. It is based upon an event; some sort of wrong - doing or deviance from the norm which results in social, physical, mental, property or financial harm. * Theories come into play and provide a perspective and embody certain assumptions. * * There is no longer a singular definition of crime, there are multiple views and opinions yet non stand as a concrete definition...

Words: 1572 - Pages: 7


...What instruments are used to measure crime in the United States? The U.S. Department of Justice administers two statistical programs to measure the magnitude, nature, and impact of crime in the Nation: the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program and the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). Each of these programs produces valuable information about aspects of the Nation’s crime problem. Because the UCR and NCVS programs are conducted for different purposes, use different methods, and focus on somewhat different aspects of crime, the information they produce together provides a more comprehensive panorama of the Nation’s crime problem than either could produce alone. What are crime rates, arrest rates, clearance rates, and recidivism rates? Recidivism is measured by criminal acts that resulted in the rearrested, reconviction, or return to prison with or without a new sentence during a three-year period following the prisoner's release. Crime Rates several methods for measuring crime exist, including household surveys, hospital or insurance records, and compilations by police and similar law enforcement agencies. Typically official crime statistics are the latter, but some offences are likely to go unreported to the police. Public surveys are sometimes conducted to estimate the amount of crime not reported to police. Such surveys are usually more reliable for assessing trends. Public surveys rarely encompass all crime, rarely procure statistics useful for local......

Words: 329 - Pages: 2


... theory that could help officers understand on a deeper level. According to, Robert Merton when individuals are denied access to legitimate methods for achieving success, the result is anomie or social strain. This often leads an individual to resort to deviant or criminal means to obtain the level of success that they are socialized to pursue. For instance, they would be able to better handle a case with a mother who is unemployed and has got caught stealing essential items for her children, yes the crime itself is wrong but she did it as a result of her being under social strain. Only if law enforcement officers could understand theories such as the stain theory they could better understand why people in the community tend to deviate towards crime. Eventually, if law enforcement officers are not trained with the knowledge of some type of criminological theory, individuals will always be looked at, as the "wineheads" were in "A Place on A Corner.While, the law are seen as the "regulars". The "regulars" who usually talk down on the windheads , and talk about their short comings in life. While law enforcement are apparently trying to help the community by trying to guide them in the right path to meet public standards it Position Paper makes, it more difficult for the people in the community because of all the judgment about their failures. With law enforcements being known to protect and serve , it cannot be properly exhibited unless law enforcement officers are trained......

Words: 800 - Pages: 4

Functionalist Theory of Crime

...Functionalist Theory Of Crime Functionalism (The Consensus structuralism theory) Functionalism is a consensus structuralism theory. Functionalists argue that there is nothing abnormal about deviance, and that it is necessary and normal in all parts of societies performing a positive function. The functions of crime and deviance (DURKEIM)Durkheim has identified a positive and a negative side to crime and deviance, it is positive in which it helps society to change and remain dynamic, whilst the negative side sees too much crime leading to social disruption. Durkheim believes that crime and deviance are inevitable and normal aspect of social life. They are inevitable because everyone cannot be equally committed to the shared values that guide ones actions, referred to as the collective consensus. He also believes that crime and deviance perform four essential functions for society: • Crime and deviance being essential for generating and sustaining morality. • Crime and deviance clarify and reaffirm the boundaries. For example by receiving retribution for a crime, such as a prison sentence, the state is making it clear that as criminal/deviant act has taken place. • Crime and deviance can promote social unity. When a crime has been committed, the entire community draws together in shared outrage, and the sense of belonging in a community is strengthened. • Crime and deviance can encourage social change by resulting in a change of shared values. This change in...

Words: 1228 - Pages: 5

The Self-Control Theory of Crime Evaluation

..., the wealthy would take advantage of the people that are poor. So that the group that is rich can obtain what they want, in the matter if none wealthy advise a concept. It will not consider, for the reason they do not have the money to back the concept. Case in point is the women liberation movement that took place, within the 1960’s that aided in with helping women be able to obtain the same fair. Those men got their jobs that they employed at within society, for the reason before the women liberation movement. The women in the workforce did not, have voice, and were not treating fair as the men were in the workforce(Linda Napikoski,2015).Noted this will not, make criminal activity not the same within other locations although women. That given fair rights, in a certain location the crime rate increases therefore people can say. For the reason, of the women’s liberation movement start an increase in criminal activity nevertheless. If a person had to give a guess on the matter, the women liberations did not have anything to do with the rise in criminal activity. The reason that crime rates have increased, for the reason the ethical values also the moral compass within the public has altered. For the reason individual do not see each other, has the same social status no more. People only care, about how they can get ahead of each other which this does describe the social theory for reasons as such(Linda Napikoski,2015). I feel that although, with these two theories there is......

Words: 1431 - Pages: 6


...The Study of Crime By Juan Andres Alvarez Crime & Society Instructor: Sara Rogers September 19, 2011 The Study of Crime: Throughout recorded history there have been numerous theories that explain why criminal behavior exists. One of those theories is The Classical Theory of Criminology, it states that the combination of free will, hedonistic decision making and the failure of the social contact in producing criminal behavior. I tend to agree that it all come done to free-will and the desire to commit such acts. In order to comprehend the study of crime we must first learn to prevent crime. There are many crime prevention programs that have work others have not. Unlike these theories many of these programs have not yet been evaluated or hold enough creditable scientific evidence to draw positive conclusions. Enough evidence is available, however, to create provisional lists of what might work; what hasn’t, and what’s potential to work in the foreseeable future. In order to formulate a possible list of programs in our neighborhoods we must continue to study of crime and its many possibilities; and to purse and punish those criminals that break the law and bring them to justice. We as society should focus on not just what type of crimes are been committed or to what rate they are been committed but we should focus our attention on the aspect of crime that has not been studied before the learning to find peace amongst ourselves. Before we can learn to...

Words: 2331 - Pages: 10


...1. Describe the major premises of the three branches of social process theory – social learning theory, social control theory, and social reaction (labeling) theory? Social learning theories assume that people are born good and learn to be bad; social control theory assumes that people are born bad and must be controlled in order to be good; and social reactions theory assumes that whether good or bad, people are shaped, directed, and influenced by the evaluations of others. 2. Travis Hirschi links the onset of criminality to the weakening of the ties that bind people to society. Identify and discuss the elements of the social bond and how they impede crime. Hirshi links the onset of criminality to weakening of the ties that bind people to society. He assumes that all individuals are potential law violators, but most are kept under control because they fear that illegal behavior ill damage their realationships with friends, family, neighbors, teachers, and employers. Without these social bonds, or ties, a person is free to commit criminal acts. Across all ethnic, religious, racial, and social groups, people whose bond to society is weak may fall prey to criminogenic behavior patterns. Hirschi argues that the social bond a person maintains with society is disvided into four main elements: attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief. 3. Discuss the key points of labeling theory and the consequences of labeling, Include in your...

Words: 972 - Pages: 4


...WEEK 8: CRIME Human social life is ruled by norms and values. Norms in terms of what is acceptable and appropriate behaviour and value in the terms of right and wrong behaviour. Crime is defined as behaviour which goes against norms and generally accepted behaviour. In another words crime is a form of deviance which breaks the law. According to Pease, 2002 “crimes are those actions deemed so disturbing to citizens or disruptive to society as to justify state inventions.” In England crime is measured using two different methods, the British Crime Survey (BCS) and police reported crime. The BCS is a large survey of a representative sample of people aged 16 and over where it asks people about the experiences if any of crime. Police recorded crime however covers crime which have been reported and recorded by the police. Who is more likely to be the victim of crime and why? Those at risk of being victims of crime vary by lifestyle characteristics and reflecting differences of the individual socially. An example of this would be those individuals who visit pubs/clubs/bars are more likely to be a risk of violence towards them than those who do not visit these places. Our individual knowledge may equip us with different images of what crime relates to what victim. For example we normally think the victim of rape as being a young female. The charts below were taken from the 2002/03 British crime survey, Victims of crime: by sex and age. |Males...

Words: 509 - Pages: 3

Theory and Crime

...Theory and Crime Kira Young CJA/314 April 30, 2012 Dave Hart Theory and Crime In today’s society there are many ups and downs when it comes to employment, where we live, and the way that we raise our children. The individuals who make up our communities today come from all walks of life, and are sometimes easily influenced by what happens within the community around them. There are often influences around us that help us make decisions that we would not normally make on our own, and this could change our way of thinking on certain issues that may arise in everyday life. Some of these decisions can make it hard to raise a child on the same morals and values that a parent grew up on. While it may be hard to raise a child, and believe in ourselves when times are hard we all have to have the belief that this too shall pass. The Meaning of Social Structure Theory By definition social structure theory is a theory that explains crime by reference to the economic and social arrangements in society, (Schmalleger 2012). There is still further explanation needed as to what this says for those communities that are within grasp of a person. The city that a person lives in has a lot to say as to the job they hold, where they send their child to school, the home in which they live, and the way they conduct themselves on a day to day basis. This is by no means a bad way of living or anything of that nature. Often humans are creatures of habit; we do...

Words: 791 - Pages: 4

Crime & Society - Durkheim's Theory of Crime

...CRIME AND SOCIETY How might Durkheim’s concept of anomie be used to explain the deviant behaviour that is becoming apparent in all strata of society? Emile Durkeim, describes how societies begin in simple forms of interaction and are held together by solidarity and likenesses. These homogenous societies he called “mechanical” with the growth of societies, together with technical and economic advances, make the inter-relationships more complicated and diverse. Members of society become more inter-dependent (“organic societies”), but viewed these changes as being natural and unavoidable, leading to greater happiness for individuals because they were released to enjoy goods produced by others and become a healthier society (a). Law plays an important role in both types of society law. In Durkheim’s view he felt crime was a normal occurrence and it was impossible to have a society totally devoid of crime, as all societies have rules and sanctions in case these are broken. Punishment deters crime but maintains social cohesion, setting boundaries and delivering order (“functionalism”). Healthy levels of crime are most likely in mechanical societies as they have a natural cohesion. An unhealthy level is more likely to arise in an organic society and is the result of the law being inadequate to regulate the interactions of the various parts of that society. The incomplete integrations gives rise to anomie, the result of which is excessive or unhealthy levels...

Words: 1020 - Pages: 5