Free Essay

Critical Thinking - Fallacies

In:

Submitted By slbinau1
Words 1366
Pages 6
Title: Unit 5 Fallacies
Kaplan University
February 11, 2014

Unit 5 Fallacies

Part I:
Mom, you know how much I love animals, right? Well, yesterday I just happened to be passing by an animal shelter, and wanted to stop in and take a look at all of those poor dogs that are going to be put to sleep. I know you told me that I couldn’t have any more pets, but there was this one dog; his name is “Butterscotch," and he was scheduled to be executed that same day, and well; I just couldn’t let them stick those huge needles in him, hurting him, and killing him for no reason. Anyway, I hope you don’t mind, but I brought him home with me. You know; I remember you telling me when you were a kid; you did the same thing, so I can’t see how this would be any different from what you used to do. Besides, I’ll take care of him, feed him, and you won’t have to do anything; I promise. If you let me keep him, I will promise to do all of my chores and never argue with you again, please!
You know; I was talking to my friend the other day, and she told me that shelters actually like killing dogs, they sell the dog remains to a company that makes dog food out of them. I’m not sure where she heard this, but she loves dogs, so I know she’s right. My friend said they make more money that way, so they really don’t care about these dogs at all; it’s always about people's greed and how much money they can make. If I can save at least one dog from becoming dog food, I would be happy. You never listen to me; you always do what you want to do. You don’t care about my feelings, and you never care about what I want. I am sure you heard that rabbit pelts are sold all the time. They raise these poor defenseless rabbits in cages, just so they can slaughter them and skin them alive. Raising animals just for their hides is horrible; I can’t believe people can be so cruel. I know you don’t care because you like your furs; you would rather keep buying your gross furs, then save the rabbits; you’re such a mean person. If you don’t let me have this dog, I am running away from home, and I’ll call Child-Protective Services on you; I will never talk to you again. I will hate you forever.
Part II: The first fallacy I made was “Ad miserricordiam” or appeal to pity. We see this fallacy all the time on TV, where we see a bunch of poor dogs that are in cages starving, and need a home. Obviously, I used this initial tactic to get my mother to feel sorry for the dogs, trying to appeal to her pathos (emotions). In order to avoid using this fallacy, you would want to stick with facts instead of blowing things completely out of proportion. The next fallacy I used was “Tu Quoque” or you too. In this fallacy, my intent is to make the claim that my mother is being a hypocrite, because she used to do the same thing; save dogs from the SPCA. My argument should not try to turn my mom’s opinion around by telling her that she used to do the same thing; her situation back then is not the same situation we are faced with here and now. For instance, she may have lived on a farm, where they had plenty of room for pets. Whereas, living in an apartment setting is quite a different scenario to consider. If indeed, the apartment setting were the issue, then it would have been more prudent to talk to the manager of the apartment, and get an okay first. In addition, I could have looked up local dog parks in the area, and let her know that I would be willing to take the dog to the dog park each day. The next fallacy I commit is “Appeal to illegitimate authority.” This fallacy is using a friend’s comment that “shelters actually like killing dogs,” is based on her opinion and not her expertise in the field. This tactic was used again to appeal to pathos or the emotional side of things. However, it is still a fallacy of appeal to illegitimate authority, because the person has no authority or expertise about the subject. This can be turned around by using facts taken from legitimate statistics on the number of dogs euthanized in shelters every year. Next, I used a “Red Herring”; this happens to be my favorite fallacy. I was talking to my mom the other day and telling her about how the water bill was going increase because of the drought, and she turned around and said, it’s all Obama’s fault that we are broke. I started laughing and told her, she had just committed a “Red Herring.”
Okay, back to the fallacy of the “Red Herring” in my paper. I completely go off onto a tangent about rabbit pelts and furs, and then I make a remark about the fact that she does not care, because she likes her furs. At this point, I am trying to bring up something worse than owning a dog, so I completely go off track and onto another subject, having nothing to do with the argument at hand. Again, going off track just confuses the issue and does not accomplish anything. Sticking to the facts is always the best plan of action. A final fallacy that I commit is “Ad baculum,” or appeal to force, by threatening her that I will run away and call Child-Protective Services on her. I remember when my son had stolen something when he was about five years old. He had put a stuffed animal in his jacket, and was hiding in the restroom. When I found out what he was doing, I could see that he was scared, and he told me that if I spanked him, he would call someone and tell on me. I had to laugh about that one. I promptly took him to the cashier, sat him up on the counter and told him to hand the stuffed animal to the clerk, and tell her that he was sorry. If he didn’t, I told him that the police would be called, and they would come and take him away, and he would never see me again. I know it was drastic, but he never stole anything else ever again. The fallacy of “Ad baculum” is the fear of force, and in my opinion, is a horrible fallacy to commit. You would expect this from a child, because they have not learned how to communicate and negotiate properly for what they want. Nevertheless, when adults commit this fallacy, they know what they are doing, and are threatening some form of personal or physical damage. In addition, the appeal to force is used to scare someone into doing something, they would otherwise not do. Other ways that appeal to force are used, would be if a person accepts or takes a certain action, then something bad might happen. For instance, my mom had told my sister that if she went motorcycle riding, she would get into an accident and possibly could die. Sadly, this appeal to force came true eight years ago. My point is that this fallacy may or may not be a coercive manner. Fallacies, in effect, weaken one's argument by using faulty reasoning, logic and by using bad assumptions. In order to avoid fallacies, one should use sound reasoning, along with legitimate evidence and facts to give proper weight to the argument. The actual word “fallacy” stems from a Latin term for “deceitful.”

“There's a mighty big difference between good, sound reasons and reasons that sound good.” Burton Hills

Reference:
Burton Hillis, cited in Laurence J. Peter, Peter's Quotations: Ideas for Our Time (1977), p. 425
Jackson, D. & Newberry, P. (2012). Critical thinking : a user's manual. Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Fallacy and Assumptions

...interfere with critical thinking? An assumption is something that we normally take for granted. We believe it to be true because of something that we are basing it on from a prior experience. We assume that our beliefs are true and we normally will use these assumptions to the way we look at the world around us. While assumptions are a part of our critical thinking which really an everyday occurrence is, we do this to be able to make sense of what we are told or what we are thinking. An assumption is like a judgment we interpret things differently than then next person, and even though we need to learn to take a step back and not listen to what we think is right, we usually do without thinking further. Interfering with our critical thinking is because we automatically think that we know that what we are assuming is to be correct, by doing this we are clouding our critical thinking of something or someone. We need to learn to look at the important part of the question to analyze it and not let our previous thoughts cloud it. What might you do to avoid making assumptions in your thinking? Something we might think about to make sure that we are not making assumptions is to look at the big picture, look at the facts, even research facts to make sure we have a clear and concise knowledge of the issue or question we are thinking or talking about. What are fallacies? How are fallacies used in written, oral, and visual arguments? A fallacy is a term that is...

Words: 587 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Critical Thinking

...Critical Thinking Critical thinking is that mode of thinking - about any subject, content, or problem - in which the thinker improves the quality of his or her thinking by skillfully taking charge of the structures inherent in thinking and imposing intellectual standards upon them. A well cultivated critical thinker: * Will frame different questions and predicts the problems in the long run process, formulating them clearly and precisely; * collects and analyze relevant information, using abstract thoughts to illuminate it effectively comes to well-reasoned conclusions and solutions, testing them against relevant situations, basic scenarios and standards; * thinks open-mindedly and thinks about the other systems, recognizing and assessing, as need be, their assumptions, suggestions, and practical results; and * Interacts and communicates effectively with team members in work, fellow students in school or college or within the family etc. in figuring out solutions to complex problems. Benefits of Critical Thinking At Work: Critical thinking makes employees and managers to look at a situation and analyze all possible solutions before taking a final decision. It can be a long process that requires ideas from different experienced people within the business organization. The benefits to critical thinking make it a valuable practice for any small business. * Produces New Ideas * Promote the development of Teamwork * Promotes Options * Uncovering...

Words: 1088 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Hum 111 App. D

...Appendix D Assumptions and Fallacies Write a 150- to 200-word response to each of the following questions: • What are assumptions? How do you think assumptions might interfere with critical thinking? What might you do to avoid making assumptions in your thinking? According to the text and assumption is “to assume is to take something for granted, to expect that things will be a certain way because they have been that way in the past or because you want them to be that way.” Critical thinking is all about doing the research, asking questions, and making sure all of your facts are correct. You must also make sure that everyone is on the same page with you and understands what you are talking about. When you assume, you are basically bypassing all of the critical thinking steps. Assumptions can interfere with critical thinking by assuming that everyone agrees with you and is familiar with your topic. When you assume you can embarrass yourself a great deal and when working at a job, making assumptions can hinder your work performance. In order to avoid making assumptions, you must realize the others will have their own ideas and may not agree with you on everything. If you want your conclusion to be clear you must construct it to be that way and not just assume that people will automatically understand you and will automatically follow you. You may have to do some persuasion on your part. • What are fallacies? How are fallacies used in written, oral, and visual...

Words: 488 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Assumptions and Fallacies

... Assumptions and Fallacies Write a 150- to 200-word response to each of the following sets of questions: • What are assumptions? How do you think assumptions might interfere with critical thinking? What might you do to avoid making assumptions in your thinking? Assumptions are beliefs or ideas of something that have not been proven to be true, or have no proof of evidence. Assumptions can also be a part of our belief system that we do not question, or that we have previously learned due to our interpretation of the world around us. Assumptions can interfere with our critical thinking because we do not stop to think about them, so we are not utilizing our critical thinking skills to the best of our ability. This can hinder our ability to think critically because it is a perpetual block that prevents us from looking at every angle of the situation or searching for the truth in the matter. In order to avoid making assumptions in our thinking, it is important to examine all of the evidence surrounding the situation, and gain control of your thought processes. We must also remain open minded to various situations or solutions, ask the right questions, and recognize things that could interfere with critical thinking like our own bias, or opinions surrounding the situation. Assuming anything could not only be hazardous for the critical thinking process, but for everyone involved in the situation. • What are fallacies? How are fallacies used in written, oral...

Words: 516 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Assumptions and Fallacies

...Associate Level Material Assumptions and Fallacies Write a 150- to 200-word response to each of the following sets of questions: • What are assumptions? How do you think assumptions might interfere with critical thinking? What might you do to avoid making assumptions in your thinking? An assumption is taking something for granted. Assumptions are expecting things to be a certain way based on how similar situations have been in the past, or because we want them to be a certain way (Ruggiero, 2012, pg.185). Making assumptions can get in the way of critical thinking. Critical thinking is a way of looking at things from every perspective, and evaluating the results of these perceptions logically. Assuming something can interfere looking at something from a logical standpoint. If we make an assumption about something we are less likely to evaluate all the different dimensions of the thing being looked at. In order to lessen the chances of making this mistake we must try not to assume things. Take away what we may think we know about the situation, and to evaluate it for what it is. Not every situation is the same and it is important to treat it that way. • What are fallacies? How are fallacies used in written, oral, and visual arguments? What might you do to avoid fallacies in your thinking? A fallacy is a mistaken belief. Fallacies are used in written, oral and visual arguments typically to throw off the other person’s train of thought, to bring you...

Words: 419 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Critical Reasoning

... The perceived “advantages” of the status-quo have an inherent cost associated with them as resistance to change can be at the cost of intellectual freedom and insight. If we are to grow as individuals, we must embrace change and the positive benefits it brings. This course, Critical Reasoning, has been quite effective in encouraging me to seek a deeper level of insight and understanding, to challenge what we believe and why. On a personal level change in my thinking has started in multiple areas. Level of Thinking Prior to this course I did not considered the level of my thinking. I have become a critic of my thinking process. The realization of being a beginning thinker has resulted in a desire to move forward to achieving the goal of being an accomplished thinker. While beginning thinkers desire to improve but lack practice, accomplished thinkers possess reasoning skills which have become natural in their daily use (Mason, 2007). I order to achieve this greater thinking level, I am trying to use time more productively in order...

Words: 1159 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Assumptions and Fallacies

...Assumptions and Fallacies Robin Combs HUM/111 August 9, 2013 Alicia Carter-Watts Assumptions and Fallacies * Assumptions are when something is taken for granted. When assumptions are made the facts are sometimes overlooked. Unfortunately, assumptions are often incorrect, and can cause huge misunderstandings or ever hurt others feelings. By assuming something, the thought process is interrupted, leaving the thinker short. When one assumes answers to their questions, or problems they no longer feel the need to think about that particular topic any longer, this is very bad for the critical thinking process. In order to avoid assumptions I will not accept answers to my questions without explanation, or proof that it is correct. It is unfair to many when assumptions are accepted, especially if they are not correct. By avoiding assumptions, I can improve my critical thinking process, and expand my knowledge. Although sometimes a correct assumption can save thinking time, it does not help the person making the assumption learn how to problem solve, or research. Some other types of assumptions might be called a guess, a theory, a hypothesis, or several other names. Regardless of what it’s called it is a type of assumption. * A fallacy is an incorrect belief. Unfortunately, fallacies too often slip through the cracks of thinking. By do research, and carefully inspecting information before accepting it as fact, these fallacies can be revealed. An example of a fallacy is the old...

Words: 356 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Fallacy Summary and Application Paper

...Fallacy Summary and Application Paper Introduction Logical Fallacies are methods in argumentations or persuasions that may look or sound good and truthful but do not stand up to critical analysis. These are errors of reasoning that may be recognized by prudent thinkers (Downes, 1995). Fallacies are more than just mistaken belief, it is a flaw in argument that may be intentionally created by a person who has an agenda or may be due to a simple error. On the other hand, Fischer (1970; p. 306) in contrast with fallacy explains logic as follows: “Logic is not everything. But it is something something which can be taught, something which can be learned, something which can help us in some degree to think more sensibly about the dangerous world in which we live.” Logical fallacies are commonly used in order to manipulate a situation or worse when an individual does not recognize the fallacies in the argument, he can be manipulated during the decision making process. As such it is necessary for every individual to use critical thinking particularly during the decision-making process for him or her to become aware of logical fallacies and how these relate to decision-making. Critical thinking as against logical fallacies is a process being used particularly in resolving a problem. It is a mental process of analyzing and evaluating information such as statements or propositions being offered as truth. This process involves reflection of the meaning of statements given, examinations...

Words: 1585 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Assumptions and Fallicies

...Assumptions and Fallacies 1.) An assumption is something you believe to be true without having proof that it is. Making an assumption is when there is not a solid basis to determine its factuality on. It is something we have determined without evaluating all of the facts and we come to a conclusion that may be not well thought out. An assumption can interfere with critical thinking by altering how we evaluate situations. We may avoid thoroughly thinking something through because we have already assumed certain things about the situation. We should try to be clear and concise and ask open questions in order to clarify a situation and listen to every aspect of it before making a decision. We have to remember not everyone is as excited about things just because we are. Also realizing that if there are imperfections in our ideas not everyone will necessarily accept it anyways. Using critical thinking before coming to a conclusion on a situation is the best idea to avoid making assumptions. 2.) Fallacies are beliefs that form a thought on that something is true when it is not true. It is something that may appear good and look how we want it to but it is false and deceptive. It is made to look a certain way under false pretenses. The arguments for fallacies are unsound and distort reality. They are misrepresentations of the truth or of a situation. Fallacies are used in written, oral, and visual arguments to draw people in. They will make it appeal to the audiences senses because...

Words: 338 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Associate Level Material

...Level Material Assumptions and Fallacies Write a 150- to 200-word response to each of the following sets of questions: • What are assumptions? How do you think assumptions might interfere with critical thinking? What might you do to avoid making assumptions in your thinking? • What are fallacies? How are fallacies used in written, oral, and visual arguments? What might you do to avoid fallacies in your thinking? Cite and reference any sourced material consistent with Associate Level Writing Style Handbook guidelines. Assumptions are beliefs or ideas of something with no proof of evidence. Assumptions interfere with our critical thinking because we aren’t utilizing our skills to our best knowledge. It hinders individuals to think critical because we have that perpetual block that stops us from looking at every angle of the equation. We allow our assumptions to take direction instead of preventing and looking at the situation to choose the truth about the situation. In order to avoid using assumptions we need to examine all evidence to make our argument valid. Also we need to be more open minded to different situations and solutions instead of just assuming the outcome or reason. Furthermore, we need to stop assuming and start asking the right questions and by doing so we can think critically without our bias ideas opinions in a situation. Assuming in anything can be potential hazardous not just in critical thinking. Fallacies are defined as a mistaken belief...

Words: 355 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Assumptions and Fallacies

...Associate Level Material Assumptions and Fallacies Write a 150- to 200-word response to each of the following sets of questions: • What are assumptions? How do you think assumptions might interfere with critical thinking? What might you do to avoid making assumptions in your thinking? • What are fallacies? How are fallacies used in written, oral, and visual arguments? What might you do to avoid fallacies in your thinking? Cite and reference any sourced material consistent with Associate Level Writing Style Handbook guidelines. 1. According to The Random House Dictionary, assumptions is the act of taking for granted or supposing, act of taking to or upon oneself, act of taking possession, arrogance or presumption. In the reading from this week assumption is to take for granted, to expect things will be a certain way because they have been in the past or you want them that way. Assumptions effect critical thinking because if you take something for granted you may not think objectively about something. When I hear the word assume, It reminds me of a saying (to assume makes an *** out of you and me!) this saying helps me keep things in perspective and will assist in the critical thinking process. One way to avoid assumptions is to ask questions (play devils advocate) of the situation or material that you are working on. By getting a different perspective from someone else and compare your way of thinking to theirs to see if there are any flaws. By looking...

Words: 456 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Assumptions

...Assumptions and Fallacies HUM/111, Professor Jennifer Morin What are assumptions? How do you think assumptions might interfere with critical thinking? What might you do to avoid making assumptions in your thinking? Assumptions are beliefs or ideas of something with no proof of evidence. Assumptions interfere with our critical thinking because we aren’t utilizing our skills to our best knowledge. It hinders individuals to think critical because we have that perpetual block that stops us from looking at every angle of the equation. We allow our assumptions to take direction instead of preventing and looking at the situation to choose the truth about the situation. In order to avoid using assumptions we need to examine all evidence to make our argument valid. Also we need to be more open minded to different situations and solutions instead of just assuming the outcome or reason. Furthermore, we need to stop assuming and start asking the right questions and by doing so we can think critically without our bias ideas opinions in a situation. Assuming in anything can be potential hazardous not just in critical thinking. What are fallacies? How are fallacies used in written, oral, and visual arguments? What might you do to avoid fallacies in your thinking? Fallacies are defined as a mistaken belief and based on an illogical argument. Fallacies are used in many things we see or hear. Fallacies are glorified fabrications of the truth. They are used in writing to get the reader...

Words: 393 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Assumptions and Fallacies

...Associate Level Material Assumptions and Fallacies Write a 150- to 200-word response to each of the following sets of questions: • What are assumptions? How do you think assumptions might interfere with critical thinking? What might you do to avoid making assumptions in your thinking? An assumption is something that is accepted as true or certain to happen, without proof. When you make an assumption you are, ultimately, throwing reasoning out the window because you have replaced critical thinking with, either, hearse or imagination. In order to not let assumptions take control of your critical thinking you, basically, need to only look at what is and speculate about potential scenarios as being true or believed to happen scenarios. This, with most things, is definitely an easier said than done scenario. For me, the best way I’ve learned to not let assumptions ruin my own critical thinking is to simply my thought process and not expect anything to happen until it actually does happen. This way I only deal with what is and not what I think. • What are fallacies? How are fallacies used in written, oral, and visual arguments? What might you do to avoid fallacies in your thinking? Fallacies are mistaken beliefs or unsound arguments that render an argument invalid. Fallacies can be used in all forms of arguments the person preparing the argument does not validate their statements by either checking the quality of their sources or not obtaining factual...

Words: 356 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Amba 610 Cliffside Holding Company Critical Thinking Analysis

...Analysis Using Critical Thinking Model: Cliffside Holding Company Memo University of Maryland University College Introduction Amidst this barrage of information in today’s world, it is often difficult to make a decision and stand by it, assured that it was the most advantageous to all those involved. Fortunately, critical thinking is a tool available to assist in making well thought out decisions in the face of contradictory opinions and impulsive actions. In Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking, Browne and Keeley (2013) explain that critical thinking is “reacting with systematic evaluation to what you have heard and read” (p. 4). They further assert that critical thinking “requires a set of skills and attitudes that are built around a series of related critical questions” (p. 4). By asking the right questions, we employ the skill of critical thinking to enhance what and how we process information. To examine the concept of critical questions, this paper will analyze a business document from Cliffside Holding of Massapequa using the critical thinking model outlined by Browne and Keeley (2013) in Asking the Right Questions. Analysis Mr. Anil Ravaswami, Vice-President (VP) of Human Resources (HR) of Cliffside Holding Company of Massapequa (CHMC), wrote a memo to CEO Cynthia Castle in response to her request for the evaluation of a proposal for a new leadership development program to be designed for Cliffside’s junior insurance executives (personal...

Words: 2691 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Asking the Right Questions

...of Ms. Ford to evaluate the state’s proposed option to privatize the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) information systems management function. In order to validate each argument in the memo I will apply the critical thinking model from the book “Asking the Right Questions” by Browne and Keeley (2010). This model is comprised of ten steps for an audience to critically analyze a conclusion by speakers and writers. The first step of the critical thinking model is to identify the conclusion of a speaker’s or writer’s argument (Browne & Kelley, 2010). Browne and Kelley (2010) define the conclusion of a speaker or writer as the “message that the speaker or write wishes you to accept”. The conclusion of the business memo is stated by Ms. Ford, “APEU Local No. 121 should challenge the governor’s proposed privatization of the DMV information systems management function as an unfair management practice”. The conclusion in this memo is located at the end of the memo and clearly stated in the conclusion section however to validate that this statement is the conclusion, identification of the issue is necessary. Browne and Kelley (2010) define an issue as a “question or controversy responsible for the conversation or discussion”. The critical thinking model describes two types of issues that could exist in a speaker’s or writer’s argument: Descriptive issue which raise questions about the accuracy of descriptions; or Prescriptive issues which raise questions about what...

Words: 2585 - Pages: 11