Premium Essay

D Alessio And Stolzenberg Theory

Submitted By
Words 657
Pages 3
Eitle, D’Alessio and Stolzenberg (2002) theory discuss radical threat and arrests. This theory starts to explain the black population and the many different social control inflicted on black individuals. This theory tested three main ideas for their thesis which was political threat, economic threat and threat of black on white crime. Political threat was based on the increase of the black community becoming larger, which was a threat to white society. So to keep up control and keep dominance whites impose threats to blacks. This theory explained if the black population declined in population, then less social control will be inflicted. Economic threat was described as the compitition between blacks and whites in the jobs area. Social control was inflicted on blacks causing different types …show more content…
This theory introduced the ideas of the behaviors of African Americans and the behavior of offending. This theory introduced two forms of radical injustice which ar racial discrimination and racist stereotype. This theroy argued that black individuals lived in a world that works against them, and majority blacks will endure in some sort of stereotype or discrimination. This theory tested if blacks were more prone to expressss anger and reduced self control if they believed in the sterotypes that of being vicious and outraged. The theoyr provide as testing to see if the behaviors and feelings from discrmination was lead to offending and criminal behaviors. This theory also tested to see if awarness of racial injustice are related to crminal activities and substance abuse dependency. The result for this theory came out to be true. That blacks whos are stertype as the bad guy or a crminal tend to offend. More data from this theory also concluded that blacks with experience in racial injustice tend to become more dependent to alcohol and drug related

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Criminal Law

...Douglas S. Coppin The Effects of Capital Punishments NIC / Executive Leadership June 2013 Evidence-Based Practice in the Criminal Justice System The phrase “because we have always done it that way” universally is no longer acceptable as it pertains to working in many sectors of the work-force, especially within the criminal justice system. Constant financial pressure to streamline budgets, coupled with ever-changing political climates have forced criminal justice organizations to embrace evidence-based concepts and practices. Evidence-based practice is defined as the use of practices that have been scientifically tested and proven effective. In simple terms, doing what works. This has led to drastic changes in various sectors from police operations, probation, sentencing, etc. When examining capital punishment the first question that must be asked is why do we do it? Is it simply a universal response to an atrocious act committed by an offender? If so, then there is no need to look any further. However, thousands of capital offense convictions are handed down annually in the U.S., yet most do not result in death penalty sentences. Therefore the only logical conclusion is that there is much more complexities in play once the state hands down capital punishment. Possible Effects of Capital Punishments at a Glance By and large, capital punishment in the United States is handed down to those offenders that are found guilty of homicide. Although not limited...

Words: 4052 - Pages: 17