Davis V. the Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County

In: Business and Management

Submitted By dnicole618
Words 808
Pages 4
Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County
January 23, 2011

1. What was the legal issue in this case?
The legal issue in the case of Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County involved acts of ill-will which could have been avoided. While employed as a detention officer at the Dona Ana County Detention Center, Joseph Herrera, was accused of unsuitable sexual behavior with female prison inmates and of exchanging favors for sex acts. Herrera’s supervisor, Frank Steele, investigated the charges and advised Herrera that he would be reprimanded. Herrera resigned to avoid disciplinary action. Six days later, Steele wrote a recommendation letter on Herrera’s behalf that portrayed him as an “excellent employee” and told prospective employers: “I am confident that you would find [Herrera] to be an excellent employee.” (Walsh, 2010, p.149). Also, constructive verbal references were made by another Detention Center supervisor. Plaintiff sued the County for negligent misrepresentation alleging that the misinformation provided by the Detention Center employees, Steele and Mochen, actually caused Herrera to be hired at MVH and Plaintiff to be assaulted.
2. Why does the court conclude that Doña Ana County could be held liable for negligent referral (misrepresentation)?
The court concludes that Doña Ana County could be held liable for negligent referral (misrepresentation) because of the positive references. Herrera acquired a position as a mental health technician at a psychiatric care hospital. Roughly six weeks later, he sexually assaulted and physically abused a female patient.
Relying in large part on Randi W. v. Muroc Joint Unified School District, 14 Cal.4th 1066 (1997). The former employers had unconditionally praised the former employee in their letters of recommendation, even though they knew of charges or…...

Similar Documents

Davis V. the Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County

...Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County  January 23, 2011 1. What was the legal issue in this case? The legal issue in the case of Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County involved acts of ill-will which could have been avoided. While employed as a detention officer at the Dona Ana County Detention Center, Joseph Herrera, was accused of unsuitable sexual behavior with female prison inmates and of exchanging favors for sex acts. Herrera’s supervisor, Frank Steele, investigated the charges and advised Herrera that he would be reprimanded. Herrera resigned to avoid disciplinary action. Six days later, Steele wrote a recommendation letter on Herrera’s behalf that portrayed him as an “excellent employee” and told prospective employers: “I am confident that you would find [Herrera] to be an excellent employee.” (Walsh, 2010, p.149). Also, constructive verbal references were made by another Detention Center supervisor. Plaintiff sued the County for negligent misrepresentation alleging that the misinformation provided by the Detention Center employees, Steele and Mochen, actually caused Herrera to be hired at MVH and Plaintiff to be assaulted. 2. Why does the court conclude that Doña Ana County could be held liable for negligent referral (misrepresentation)? The court concludes that Doña Ana County could be held liable for negligent referral (misrepresentation) because of the positive references. Herrera acquired a...

Words: 808 - Pages: 4

Davis V. the Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County 1

...Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County Wanda Pennywell Professor Jama Rand HRM 510 July 16, 2011 Abstract In this paper I will discuss the case of Davis v. the Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County. In this case Joseph Herrera an employee at the detention center was accused of sexually harassing the female inmates. Herrera’s supervisor at MVH where he was employed, advise Herrera that they will taking actions to discipline him due to the complaints and Herrera resigns. Herrera asks his employers to give him a letter of recommendation for an employer he was applying for and the supervisors give him an outstanding recommendation. His supervisors neglect to tell the prospective employer that at the time of his employment he was under investigation for sexual harassment. Because they did not disclose that information they employed Herrera and he repeated his actions. 1. What was the legal issue in this case? The legal issue in this case is whether or not the Doña Ana County Detention Center was responsible for the actions of Joseph Herrera. While working for the Doña Ana County Detention Center, Herrera was under investigation for sexually harassing various females in the detention center. The sexual harassment claims involved sexual statements and comments, requesting to have sexual relations with the inmates and in some cases receiving sex from the inmates in return for assisting them with various different things...

Words: 1106 - Pages: 5

Hrpetty V. Metropolitan Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County

...Petty v. Metropolitan Gov't of Nashville & Davidson County Strayer University Professor Jama Rand, PhD, SP HRM510 Business Employment Law August 7, 2011 What was the legal issue in this case? In Petty v. Metropolitan Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson County, the legal issue was about whether the employee had been truthful about the reasons for his discharge from service. Another issue in the case was in regards to the postponement in re-employing a returning Army reservist, which violated the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), although the delay was based on the employee’s alleged dishonesty (Walsh, 2010). The US government has taken numerous steps to ensure that the employers to not discriminate when hiring, promoting or firing employees. According to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) employers cannot discriminate based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Metro re-hired Petty but did not return him to his previous position of patrol sergeant or a substantially similar position. Petty was relegated to answering phone calls and occasionally taking police reports (Walsh, 2010). Metro’s Office of Professional Accountability conducted an investigation into whether Petty lied on his return-to-work paperwork by admitting that he faced military charges in Kuwait, but did not disclose that he was accused of giving alcohol to an enlisted soldier and of manufacturing...

Words: 805 - Pages: 4

Davis V. the Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County

...What was the legal issue in this case? The legal issue in the case of Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County involves whether a person making a recommendation to a prospective employer of another is bound by the actions of the said employee. The case involves a positive, but inaccurate, recommendation of Joseph “Tinie” Herrera as an employee of high character and standards. Herrera had previously been employed at the Dona Ana County Detention Center where his conduct had been under question. He had been under investigation for using his authority as detention sergeant and classification officer to sexually harass female inmates at the detention center. Herrera was accused, in a report authored by Steele, of using his authority over the girls to get sex in exchange for personal favors for them. As Herrera’s immediate supervisor, part of Steele’s job included recommending discipline. His choice would include suspension without pay, demotion in rank, and a possible reassignment away from his accusers. Herrera was informed by Steele on April 5, 1994 that on April 12 he would make these recommendations. Herra resigned before the recommended punishment could take place. However, six days after the resignation, Steele wrote a very impressive, but inaccurate, recommendation to a perspective employer of Herrea. In the letter, he stated how Herrera implemented social programs for the inmates with “imagination and imagination.” (Walsh, 2010) He...

Words: 630 - Pages: 3

Johnson V. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County

...Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County 1. What was the legal issue in this case? What did the Supreme Court decide? Why? The issue being considered was if the Transportation Agency violated the Civil Rights of Johnson (a male employee) by selecting Joyce (a female employee) for a promotion when gender was a contributing factor in the selection process. The review board recommended Johnson for the position but Joyce was awarded the position by the selecting official as part of a documented Affirmative Action plan. Johnson maintained that his rights were violated because Joyce’s gender was a contributing factor to the selection process, and because he was the most favored candidate the position should have been awarded to him (Walsh, 2010). 2. What does this case reveal about the conditions under which affirmative action is legal? This case shows that affirmative action is legal when several factors are in place. Affirmative actions must be conducted with the intent of correcting an imbalance in the workforce that was created by “Old patterns.” Because the goal in hiring the top female applicant was to help correct just such an imbalance, the action is legal. Additional factors that must also be in place include, a documented affirmative action plan, the plan must not authorize blind hiring of individuals that are not qualified based on factors within the plan. The plan must not bar advancement of qualified individuals that do not fall within...

Words: 610 - Pages: 3

Davis V. the Board of County Commissioner of Doña Ana County

...Assignment #1 – Davis v. The Board of County Commissioner of Doña Ana County Lisa Auvil January 22, 2012 Business Employment Law - HRM 510 Dr. Zelphia A. Brown, SPHR, Instructor Assignment #1 – Davis v. The Board of County Commissioner of Doña Ana County 1. What is the legal issue in this case? The legal issue in this case is negligent referral (Walsh p 148). Negligent referral is when a former employer gives a positive recommendation that leads to half-truths with regards to the character of a former employee. Liability may be imposed if the referral leads to foreseeable and considerable risk or harm to a third party (McCord 1999). Mesilla Valley Hospital (MVH), a psychiatric hospital in Doña Ana County hired Joseph Herrera (Herrera) as a mental health technician on January 20, 1995. Prior to his employment with MVH Herrera was a detention sergeant and classification officer at Doña Ana County Detention Center (Detention Center). According to the plaintiff Herrera was hired by MVH based on the unqualified favorable recommendations from his former Detention Center Supervisors Frank Steele and Al Mochen. The accuracy of these recommendations is the crux of the Plaintiff’s suit against the County ("Davis v. the," 1999). 2. Why does the court conclude that Doña Ana County could be held liable for negligent referral (misrepresentation)? While employed at the Detention Center in 1993 a female inmate alleged that Herrera had sexually harassed...

Words: 792 - Pages: 4

Davis V. Dona County

...Davis vs. Doña Ana County 2 What was the legal issue in this case? There are three legal issues in this case that were found, which are negligent hiring, negligent referral and foreseeability. Negligent hiring is defined as “it extends the liability of employers for harm caused by their employees beyond actions undertaken within the scope of employment to harmful actions that lie outside the scope of employment” (Walsh, 2010, p.132). Even though Mesilla Valley Hospital is not being sued, they exercised negligence in hiring Herrera because they failed to do more extensive research when looking to hire Herrera, instead of going off of a basic recommendation letter. I believe that in certain work environments that involve the care for others, the patients have a due diligence that is owed to them that they will always be protected and cared for by their caretakers. Herrera took advantage of not only Davis, but also the inmates in Doña Ana County, which unfortunately can ruin the victim’s lives. As stated in the textbook, negligent referral is defined as “a former employer’s misrepresentation about an employee in giving a reference…” (Walsh, 2010, p.677). Frank Steele, Doña Ana County’s director blatantly showed negligence when after scheduling a hearing for Herrera’s behavior and Herrera resigning, he submitted a recommendation letter on behalf of Herrera giving nothing but praise to his work ethics. The final legal issue is...

Words: 1028 - Pages: 5

Davis V. the Board of County Commissioners of Dana Ana County

...Davis v. the Board of County Commissioners of Dana Ana County Patty Turner Dr. John Loblack HRM510 Business Employment Law 11/01/2012 Davis v. the Board of County Commissioners of Dana Ana County This case explores the fundamental legal issue of negligent referrals or misrepresentations of facts that an employer provides regarding a previous employee. Questions for the court to evaluate regarding the matter are: What if provided references are misleading? Can an employer be sued for exercising negligence in referring an unfit employee who harms or show foreseeable possibilities of causing harm on a new job? Who bestows the duty of care? What was the legal issue in this case? The legal issue in the case of Davis v the Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County involved the misrepresenting of referral information of a previous employee, Joseph Herrera. Herrera was a detention officer at the Dona Ana County Detention Center who was disciplined for having improper sexual interaction with female prison inmates. In spite of these unprofessional issues, Herrera’s supervisor, Frank Steele, gave him an outstanding reference; a reference that helped him secure another position at another institution. In addition to Steele’s excellent letter of reference, Herrera received a positive verbal recommendation from another supervisor, Mochen. Unfortunately, Herrera did not live up to the positive referrals he received...

Words: 995 - Pages: 4

County Blaze

...County Blaze It was a particularly peaceful night for me and my family in the hot Texas air. We had just finished with a full day, of the first part, of our annual family reunion and were getting ourselves settled to just hang out with each other. We put on a movie, and sat down to enjoy it when a sudden roar shook the foundation of our country home. Minutes later the streets, as well as my home turned in to a black void in which all the lights were no longer on. In a panic my family and I stumbled through the house trampling each other in the darkness. We scattered about until my mom found the door that revealed a vivid red glow. Soon after the same glow attracted the rest of my family and I, so we followed, but what we found was not an appealing sight. The ruckus that shook the house turned out to be the electrical tower that powered the entire street or what was left of it. The tower exploded leaving the streets black. Unfortunately for me and the people, who live on my street, there was a fire that had spread through the fields around where the tower lay, and we lived miles away from any real, stable, fire department. This put us in a massive state of shock, so we quickly scurried along the out skirts of the fire, trying to find some way of getting the fire to die out. The search was a long one, but no luck came are way. The fire grew more and more, and every one began to panic as there seemed to be no hope of extinguishing the rippling blaze. Because it...

Words: 693 - Pages: 3

River County

... organization to get information on the program, share their stories and receive their contributions’, etc. Today the agency has 395 employees serving more than 4,000 people and a budget for each county exceeds 25 billion dollars a year. In focusing over the years of popular news where mental health has been addressed per say, the first story that comes to mind is when Rose Mary Kennedy oldest sister of J.F. Kennedy’s had her frontal lope portion of her brain removed because doctors believed it would cure her mental illness. Then there was the story of Brooke Shields actively speaking in 2005 on her struggle with post partum depression after the birth of her first child. But in most recent news we have heard of mental health suffers not taking their medications becoming delusional taking the innocent lives of many people. Like the shootings in Colorado and of course we have heard of the endless lives taken by suicide from being buddied at school or via the internet. Furthermore, in dealing with mental illness here a study of how the simple environment in Australia attributed to the raising cases of depression. The study concluded that after 30 years of continuous drought this was what followed, “Farming can be a stressful occupation, even without taking drought into consideration. 2,3 Suicide rates for male Australian farmers are higher than both the national average and for comparable rural populations,4 and high levels of physical and psychological ill health have been......

Words: 1304 - Pages: 6

David V. the Board of County Commissioners of Dona Ana County

... they feel a good recommendation cannot be given or they tell the truth if they choose to give a recommendation. Employers should not be reluctant to give a recommendation. If you have a good employee you should give them a recommendation and stick solely to their job performance while they were employed with you. If you have an employee who has the potential to do harm to another company it is in the best interest of the company not to give a written or verbal recommendation. References Davis v. the board of county commissioner of doña ana county. (1999, July 13). Retrieved from http://caselaw.findlaw.com/nm-court-of-appeals/1458660.html Job reference shield laws. (2012, January 17). Retrieved from http://www.crimcheck.com/resources/job-reference-shield-laws.htm Kleiman, C., Negligent Hiring Law Ensures a Safer Workplace, Chicago Tribune, Aug. 18, 1996. McCord, L. (1999). Defamation vs. negligent referral. 2(2), Retrieved from http://gbr.pepperdine.edu/2010/08/defamation-vs-negligent-referral/ Randi W. v. Muroc Joint Unified School District, 929 P.2d 582 (Cal. 1997). Walsh, D. J. (2010). Employment law for human resource practice: 2010 custom edition (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning...

Words: 956 - Pages: 4

Petty V. Metropolitan Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson County

...Petty v. Metropolitan Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson County Petty v. Metropolitan Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson County The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 provides employment protection to National Guard and Reserve military personnel. This legislation protects military veterans and reservists' rights with respect to their civilian jobs and benefits, and outlines employee, and employer responsibilities. (Lundin, p. 20). The law also requires employers to refrain from discrimination in hiring, re-employment and benefits because of an employee's military service or connection (Lundin, p. 20). In the case of Petty v. Metropolitan Government the company was accused of violating this legislation. 1. What were the legal issues of this case? The legal issue of this case of Petty v. Metropolitan Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson County is the alleging of racial discrimination under disparate treatment and disparate impact. Another issue in the case is the postponement of re-employing a returning Army reservist, which violated the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) of 1994, although the delay was based on the employee’s alleged dishonesty (Walsh, 2010). In Petty v. Metropolitan Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson County, Metro re-hired Petty but did not return him to his previous position of patrol sergeant. Petty was demoted to answering phone calls and occasionally taking police reports...

Words: 934 - Pages: 4

Hrm 510 Assignment 1 Davis V. the Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County

...HRM 510 Assignment 1 Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County Purchase here http://homeworkonestop.com/HRM%20510/hrm-510-assignment-1-davis-v-the-board-of-county-commissioners-of-dona-ana-county Product Description Assignment #1 – Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County Read the Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County case. You are to write a 3-4 page report that answers the following questions: 1. 1. What was the legal issue in this case? 2. 2. Why does the court conclude that Doña Ana County could be held liable for negligent referral (misrepresentation)? 3. 3. Should it have mattered that the former employer’s investigation was not able to confirm all of the allegations against Herrera? Explain your answer. 4. 4. What practical implications does this decision hold? Are you convinced by the court’s claim that this ruling should not make employers more reluctant to provide references? The format of the report is to be as follows: • Typed, double spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one inch margins on all sides, APA format. • Type the question followed by your answer to the question. • In addition to the 3-4 pages required, a title page is to be included. The title page is to contain the title of the assignment, your name, the instructor’s name, the course title, and the date. HRM 510 Assignment 1 Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County...

Words: 945 - Pages: 4

Hrm 510 Assignment 1 Davis V. the Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County

...HRM 510 Assignment 1 Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County Purchase here http://homeworkonestop.com/HRM%20510/hrm-510-assignment-1-davis-v-the-board-of-county-commissioners-of-dona-ana-county Product Description Assignment #1 – Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County Read the Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County case. You are to write a 3-4 page report that answers the following questions: 1. 1. What was the legal issue in this case? 2. 2. Why does the court conclude that Doña Ana County could be held liable for negligent referral (misrepresentation)? 3. 3. Should it have mattered that the former employer’s investigation was not able to confirm all of the allegations against Herrera? Explain your answer. 4. 4. What practical implications does this decision hold? Are you convinced by the court’s claim that this ruling should not make employers more reluctant to provide references? The format of the report is to be as follows: • Typed, double spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one inch margins on all sides, APA format. • Type the question followed by your answer to the question. • In addition to the 3-4 pages required, a title page is to be included. The title page is to contain the title of the assignment, your name, the instructor’s name, the course title, and the date. HRM 510 Assignment 1 Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County...

Words: 1889 - Pages: 8

County Report

...  report,  the  government  is  planning  to  build  new  ports  in  an  attempt  to   improve  and  expand  its  regional  port  infrastructure  by  2030  (Morocco  World  News,  2015).  Morocco   has   one   of   the   most   developed   traffic   systems   on   the   North   African   continent.   It   consists   of   nearly   60.000km  of  classified  roads,  11  commercial  ports,  1.907km  of  railway,  and  15  airports  open  to  local   and   international   traffic   (Moroccan   Investment   Development   Agency,   2015).   For   over   a   decade,   Moroccan   government   has   been   launching   large-­‐scale   projects   aimed   at   elevating   its   infrastructure     7   performance.   Especially,   international   businesses   will   have   great   convenience   to   export   goods   and   services  to  Morocco,  such  as  automobiles  and  high-­‐tech  products.       V.  Financial  and  Banking  Sector   The  economic  environment  remains  conducive  to  further  growth  of  private  and  commercial  banking   activity   in   Morocco.   In  ......

Words: 3601 - Pages: 15