Free Essay

Dawkins Delusion

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By jagggg
Words 1037
Pages 5
Dawkin’s Delusion
(1) Deluded about God?
(2) Has Science Disproved God?
-the advancement of science and discovery does not equate to atheism rising or substantiating what atheism stands for -nature can be interpreted in a theistic and atheistic way; both are genuine intellectual possibilities for science -there are limits to science;

-“some ultimate questions lie beyond science” Sir Martin Rees, president of Royal society, which brings together Britain’s leading scientists -the great questions of life cannot be answered with any degree of certainty; any given set of observations can be explained by a number of theories -science cannot be mixed by interpretation

-“science explains everything” outlook is dismissed and naïve -scientific theories cannot “explain the world” but only “explain the phenomena” observed in the world. -is there purpose within nature?

How did everything begin? What are we all here for? What is the point of living? Where are we going after this? Non-overlapping magisteria of science & religion
Partially overlapping magisteria of science & religion  a realisation that science and religion offer possibilities of cross fertilisation on account of interpenetration of their subjects and methods Francis Collins; evolutionary biologist who heads up the famous Human Genome Project: “a richly satisfying harmony between the scientific and spiritual worldviews” “principles of faith is complementary to the principles of science” Owen Gingerich (leading Harvard astronomer) “this belief does not interfere with the scientific enterprise” Survey in 1997: 45% did not believe in God, 40% believed in God, 15% were unsure Trend expected where people would grow out of infancy and stop believing in God altogether proved to be false as the number stabilised through the years Atheists who say they believe in science actually bring in assumptions to their science instead of basing it on science Dawkin’s stand: religion & science at locked into a battle to the death; only one can emerge victorious and that is science (3) Origins of religion -dawkins argue that man created religion as they were longing for something more -wanting or longing for something is no demonstration that it does not exist -all world views are a response to human needs and desires

-delusion of God was there as people were socially and economically alienated; which would die out naturally when socialist revolution came; -Sigmund Freud argued that origins of belief in God lay in the longing for a father-figure. Once it is appreciated that God is a wish-fulfillment conjured up as a result of human projection, we can move beyond this infantile illusion, and grow up -dawkins attack it saying it is a delusion and conjured by the mind but this argument is flawed because belief in God is based on many aspects such as knowledge, beliefs, experience, ritual practices, social affiliation, motivation and behavioural consequences -dennett argued that: we have a god centre which depended on a mystical gene because people with it tend to survive better (natural selection) -inconsistent with his idea of universal Darwinism which eschews any notion of purpose: a view famously summarised in his statement that the universe has no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind pitiless indifference Dawkins cant say religion as something accidental borne out as his understanding of the evolutionary process precludes any theorical framework that allows him to suggest that some outcomes are intentional and some are accidental Dawkins proposition is not based on any research or facts

We find speculation and supposition taking the place of rigorous evidence-driven and evidence-based arugments that we have the right to expect. Dawkins theories though highly interesting must be considered to be highly speculative. His arguments about the psychological origins of religion are littered with ‘maybes’ and ‘mights’, verbal signpost that there is no substantial evidence for the highly tenuous and speculative ideas he explores Whatever benefits of religion there might be, these writers believe that they arise entirely inside human minds. No spiritual realities exist outside us World views can easily promote fanaticism. Dawkins treat this as a defining characteristic of religion and this fanaticism is irrational
Cognitive bias is in all of us which causes us to turn a blind eye to evidence which may not suit our world view. Religion is a by-product of the misfiring of several of these modules Sigmond Freud pointed out that religion was the most complex phenomenon in civilisation; making it impossible to explain by any single factor Dawkin asserts that religion is a “virus of the mind” this argument quickly fails as a virus is not merely hypothesized; they can be identified, observed and their structure Dawkin separates rational ideas that mind can conjure as legit and irrational ideas that mind conjure (religion) as mental viruses. For e.g. being nice could be a mental virus, why is it good or right? Since everything is random World views cannot be proven;

Dawkin is making a lot of assertions which are based on his highly subjective personal judgment Dawkins define religious belief as blind trust, which refuses to take due account of evidence, or subject itself to examination (which is not true) After examination, religion or belief in God can stand and is compatible with what is believed. God meme performs well because it has high survival value or infective power in the environment provided by human culture. The meme cannot be considered a viable scientific hypothesis when there is no clear operational definition of a meme, no testable model for how memes influence culture and why standard selection models are not adequate, The scientific evidence for memes is actually much weaker than the historical evidence for the existence of Jesus. Dismiss the notion that all religions say more or less the same thing. They clearly do not. (alister mcgrath) Examples of atheist idealogy causing violence: soviet authorities systematically destroyed and eliminated the vast majority of churches and priests during the period 1918-41. This violence and repression was undertaken in pursuit of an atheist agenda; the elimination of religion Dawkins view that atheism promotes peace and without religion there will be peace is a naïve and immature stand. Atheism needs to subject itself to the self-searching intellectual and moral criticisms that religious systems are willing to direct against themselves

Similar Documents

Free Essay

God Delusion

...GROUP ASSIGNMENT THE GOD DELUSION DEBATE Question 1: I chose to listen to Dr. John Lennox because I personally believe that there is a God that exists in our midst, and it would be great to have an open mind to see the perspective in the other point of view which does not believe the presence of God. In the debate between Prof Richard Dawkins and Dr John Lennox, the strength that Dr John Lennox has is that he stands by firmly in his belief that he greatly challenged the remarks made by Prof Richard Dawkins, that science overlaps religion. Prof Dawkins stated that “Faith is blind, science is evidence-based”, and added that religion tells that there is no understanding in things but just be persuaded that God did it. However, Dr Lennox opposed by saying that science cannot tell what is morally right or wrong, and science also cannot explain the purpose of the existence of a child. Therefore, he believed that Prof Hawkins has contrasted the meaning between science and religion that religion is just being contemplated but science is unraveling the understanding of the universe. Another strength that Dr John Lennox has is that his reasoning was logical even though it was not fully based on evidence or facts, but instead with human intellectual and good sense....

Words: 2266 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Richard Dawkins Worldview Paper

...Richard Dawkins Richard Dawkins is an Oxford biologist and well respected speaker who believes there is no such thing as God or anything supernatural. He adopted the theory of natural selection as an "adequate explanation for the beauty and complexity of life" (Dawkins, 2009, p. 23). Richard Dawkins’ feelings about family, social issues and the nature of God is represented in his worldview. I will compare and contrast the values and actions of Richard Dawkins with my own. Richard Dawkins worldview is evident in his look at the family unit. His Atheism didn’t develop overnight. He was raised as a Christian but never was quite satisfied with its explanations (Dawkins, 2009). When he was nine he first learned from his mother that "Christianity wasn't the only religion and that they all contradicted each other" (Stewart, 2013, p. 2). Dawkins believes that influencing a child’s beliefs to follow that of the parents is a form of child abuse. They should be encouraged from the time they are very young to start thinking and making religious type decisions for themselves (Dawkins, 2009). Richard Dawkins doesn't believe that morals need to have anything to do with religion, nor do we learn good ethics and morals from the Bible (Dawkins, 2006). He also believes in the use of birth control and that religion is wrong thinking it can dictate this. Overpopulation has resulted in much poverty and Dawkins believes that religion is to blame for this (Dawkins 2009)....

Words: 944 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Role Model Review: Richard Dawkins

...Kimberly Simon CWV-101 July 28, 2013 Ron Woodworth Role Model Review: Richard Dawkins Clinton Richard Dawkins is a retired Oxford University professor. He is also known for being an evolutionary biologist and an author. As a child, Dawkins was brought up in a Christian home, in the Anglican Church. According to Dawkins, he learned that the world had many different religions when he was nine years old. Around the age of fifteen, he discovered Darwinism and started believing in the theory of evolution. Dawkins feels that Darwinism is a better explanation of life on earth than the Biblical explanation that God created the universe, man, and everything in it. Dawkins has an atheist worldview and expresses his worldview in numerous books, journals, and lectures. In this essay, I will compare and contrast Dawkins’ values and beliefs with my own concerning family, career, social issues and the nature of God. Dawkins’ family consisted of his father, mother and sister. His parents believed in God and attended church. They were interested in natural science and taught him everything using terms of science. As Dawkins studied Darwinism, he turned away from Christianity and became a nonbeliever. As a child, my family life was similar to Dawkins’ family life. I was brought up in a Christian household. My parents taught me many things, and I have one sister....

Words: 1025 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay


...ATHEISM: Is it the new religion? Religion is a respect for what is sacred, a reverence for God. It is a bond between man and God. What is religion? It is a collection of cultural system, belief system and those world views that establishes a kind of symbol that relates humanity to spirituality and moral values. Many religions have their own way of narratives, symbols, traditions, sacred histories that are intended to give meaning to life or to explain the origin of life or the universe. Religion is a faith or belief and it there is a tendency that certain idea of morality, ethics, and sacredness is followed. But what stirs my mind is the idea of not believing in a God? These set of non-believers of God have been termed as Atheist. Atheism is characterized by an absence of belief in the existence of gods. This absence of belief generally comes about either through deliberate choice, or from an inherent inability to believe religious teachings which seem literally incredible. It is not a lack of belief born out of simple ignorance of religious teachings. Some atheists go beyond a mere absence of belief in gods: they actively believe that particular gods, or all gods, do not exist. Just lacking belief in Gods is often referred to as the "weak atheist" position; whereas believing that Gods do not (or cannot) exist is known as "strong atheism." It a grand debate no doubt and forces me to think if atheism is the new religion? From the primitive times, people have had......

Words: 601 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Apologetics Application Paper

...Apologetics Application Paper: Part 2 Submission Form Kristina Pickett APOL 500 November 15, 2014 Instructions for submitting the Apologetics Application Paper: Part 2 • Complete your introduction as it will appear in the final paper. • Include an outline of each major element of the final paper. • Include your full bibliography. • Follow the template / submission form provided. Submit the Apologetics Application Paper: Part 2 by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 4. Add as much space as necessary to each section below. 1. Introduction Paragraph for Final Paper: As a Christian born and raised I have created for myself a sheltered little world where only Christians exist. My entire family is Christian, I grew up in a predominately Christian neighborhood, of course, I only associated with the Christian neighbors, I attended a small Christian college and I married a Christian. My husband and I decided to raise our little Christian family in a middle upper class community with the mindset that we would provide for our children a more affluent environment, provide a better public education and give them opportunities for a more successful future. We also wanted diversity for our children so that they would have the advantage of experiencing different cultures and having a broader general worldview of humanity. Good idea, yet, unexpected results. We found it very difficult to raise...

Words: 603 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

My Philosophy on Life

...Introduction When the movie Independence Day came out in 1996, I wanted to work for the Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI). While I have never realized that dream, it did spark in me an extremely strong desire for knowledge and wisdom of pure science, which has evolved into an even greater desire to understand the fundamental properties of this universe. It’s ironic really, because, according to Philosophy: The Power of Ideas, Western philosophy began when Thales of Greece considered the possibility that there must be some “fundamental kind of stuff” everything in the universe is made of. (Moore 22) While Thales was on the right track, he was wrong to suggest that thing was water, but his reasoning was based on logic. Despite being incorrect, Thales assumptions led to the beginning of metaphysics, the study of a simpler underlying reality, and that is what physics is today. In fact, theoretical physicists of today do just about anything they can to make their equations simpler. For example, we believe there are four fundamental forces of the universe: gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces. Each one of these forces alone is represented by ugly, chaotic equations. In an attempt to “splice” all four equations together, each equation was revised to include a component that allowed the forces to operate in 10 dimensions instead of the four we are familiar with. Low and behold, after the adjustment, the equations magically fit......

Words: 3200 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Why Has the Concept of the Big Society Failed to Catch the Public's Imagination?

...Why has the concept of the ‘Big Society’ failed to catch the public’s imagination? The concept of the ‘Big Society’ was developed as the flagship policy of the Conservative Party as part of the 2010 election campaign, an initiative designed to transfer powers from local government to the people of the community. The Big Society encompasses everything from free schools and libraries, to supporting local sports groups and repairing vandalised or damaged public property. Despite being championed as “the most important and radical part of the coalition government’s agenda” (Bishop & Green, 2011:30), the response from the British public has been underwhelming to say the least. Indeed, in its first year, a mere 24 free schools (schools funded by the government, but ran by parents, teachers, companies, religious groups or voluntary groups) were approved and opened. Furthermore, an Ipsos MORI poll (2010a) found that 60% of the public felt that the government was responsible for improving public services and public areas, and that they shouldn’t be calling on the public to do so. Various reasons exist for the Big Society failing to capture the public’s imagination; quite simply, many people just do not understand what exactly the Big Society is. Considering the current economic climate, it is also safe to say that most people do not care about what the Big Society is, as they have more pressing issues such as feeding their families and affording their energy bill......

Words: 3465 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay


...Chapter 10: Leadership: A Global Reality HILARIE OWEN Overview The concept of leadership has been written about for at least five thousand years. It is written in hieroglyphic form in the Cairo Museum and there is divided into three words: Seshemu (leader),Seshemet (leadership) and Shemsu (follower). Unlike management, leadership is an ancient concept and one that is used in everyday language. In addition, the language we use is not just a means of communication; it involves thinking and reasoning. In ancient Chinese writings we learn that if a leader is good it is more likely that those who follow will also be good. If the leader is selfish, so will the followers be selfish. Confucius regarded education as a transformational process that takes place within an individual but does so through conversation with others. Learning through others has been a common theme in the chapters written here from different parts of the world. In other words, learning leadership is not so much an isolated journey as one that exists in a set of relations with others. Finding what leadership potential you have is not something you do in isolation or on a training course. While the 20th century provided a huge richness of writings on leadership, leadership development in organizations focused on the individual as leader and this has created a gap between theory and practice. As John Gardner wrote: 'We have barely scratched the surface in our effort towards leadership development. In the mid......

Words: 5822 - Pages: 24

Premium Essay


...A religion is an organized collection of beliefs, cultural systems, and world views that relate humanity to an order of existence.[note 1] Many religions have narratives, symbols, and sacred histories that aim to explain the meaning of life, the origin of life, or the Universe. From their beliefs about the cosmos and human nature, people may derive morality, ethics, religious laws or a preferred lifestyle. Many religions may have organized behaviors, clergy, a definition of what constitutes adherence or membership, holy places, and scriptures. The practice of a religion may include rituals, sermons, commemoration or veneration (of a deity, gods, or goddesses), sacrifices, festivals, feasts, trances, initiations, funerary services, matrimonial services, meditation, prayer, music, art, dance, public service, or other aspects of human culture. Religions may also contain mythology.[1] The word religion is sometimes used interchangeably with faith or set of duties;[2] however, in the words of Émile Durkheim, religion differs from private belief in that it is "something eminently social".[3] A global 2012 poll reports 59% of the world's population as "religious" and 36% as not religious, including 13% who are atheists, with a 9% decrease in religious belief from 2005.[4] On average, women are "more religious" than men.[5] Some people follow multiple religions or multiple religious principles at the same time, regardless of whether or not the religious principles they follow......

Words: 7947 - Pages: 32

Free Essay

Science and Religion: Bridging the Great Divide

...ESSAY; Science and Religion: Bridging the Great Divide EVER since science began drifting away from religion, centuries ago, each has dreamed of subsuming the other. Scientists, in their boldest moments, speak of explaining away all the mysteries by empirical inquiry, leaving no need for ancient wisdom. And the faithful, fervently believing in spiritual forces unmeasurable by any meter, find it absurd that God's children would aspire to heaven solely by building telescopes and computers -- scientific Towers of Babel. They have longed for a reality beyond the shadowplay of the material realm. Left between these extremes are many people who are both scientific and religious, and confused about whether a bridge can ever cross the divide. Every few decades, this hope for reconciliation, or ''dialogue,'' experiences a revival. The most recent may be the biggest, with books, conferences and television shows trying to find a common ground between two fundamentally different ways of thinking about the world. In the 1970's scholars tried to merge science with Eastern religion; the emphasis now is on rejoining science with monotheistic, usually Christian, faith. Not all the work is motivated by religious passion. In his new best-selling book, ''Consilience'' (Knopf), the Harvard biologist Edward O. Wilson tries to revive the Enlightenment dream of a unified system of knowledge that would embrace not only the sciences but also morality and ethics, removing them from the uncertainties...

Words: 2455 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Religions of the World

...Mankind has often attributed bewildering phenomena to the supernatural, specifically to God or gods. From ancient civilizations to today, God has been the suspected force behind a wide spectrum of events. From the movement of celestial bodies to the workings of microorganisms, to astonishing moments in sports, God, usually within the context of religion, is the magician behind it all. A higher force may exist but presenting it as truth or even likely is not sensible. Religion negatively affects rationality with its doctrines, scriptures, and governance because it promotes ignorance. Ignorance comes in many forms; ignorance of evidence, moral perspective, other faiths, equality, etc. Theorizing a higher force is neither illogical nor dangerous, but piling on details contrary to what reason dictates does just that. It was sensible for ancient civilizations to do such things, and the same goes for primitive cultures today. However, these ideas should not subsist in the modernized parts of the world. The rise of religious beliefs within past civilizations does seem reasonable when considering the time period. Calling the ancient Egyptians “dumb” or their beliefs “stupid” is naïve since they lacked scientific knowledge and the means to obtain it. To the Egyptians, the sun and moon appeared as if they were moving and switching places periodically. The “mover” responsible for these actions was labeled Ra, the sun god. Now we know that Earth’s rotation affects the amount of......

Words: 2831 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

The Abrogation of Organized Religion and the Push for Universal Scientific Literacy

...The Abrogation of Organized Religion and the Push for Universal Scientific Literacy Since religion was humankind’s first attempt at trying to understand the chaotic world around them, it was therefore the worst attempt. The fact that organized religion still persists in the modern technologically advanced society is so preposterous that it’s almost beyond comprehension how it has managed to, not only survive, but thrive. Organized religion, in all of its various guises, is an antiquated device of manipulation and control; it’s the root cause of nearly all wars, poverty, bigotry, racism, terrorism, and human suffering. It is also the most fundamental hindrance of scientific progress that mankind faces and should therefore be methodically phased out and replaced by atheism, secular humanism, and most of all, an education focused primarily on scientific literacy. What is the Essence of Religion?: It was once an inconceivable act for a human being to question the existence of some sort of a creator god, or gods. People had all the evidence they needed right in front of them: they were conscious and alive, the world was beautiful, coincidences happened which seemed much like prayer being answered, and the earth was encased inside of a celestial sphere while the heavens appeared to revolve directly around the earth, making man the very center of this profound design; it was almost as if the world was created specifically for humans. Thus,......

Words: 4721 - Pages: 19

Free Essay


...A2 Religious Studies Revision Booklet To be used alongside the textbook and your classnotes. Contents G581: Philosophy of Religion Religious Language......................................................………p.1 Religious Experience........................................................…...p.7 Miracles..................................................................…………...p.12 Nature of God............................................................………...p.16 Life and Death.........................................................…………..p.20 G582: Religious Ethics Meta-ethics...........................…………………………………….p.25 Free Will and Determinism………………………………….……p.28 Conscience.......................…………………………………….…p.32 Virtue Ethics………………………………………………………..p.36 Sexual Ethics…………………………………………………...….p.40 Environment and Business Ethics……………………………….p.44 Religious Language Introduction The problems of religious language: • If we use language univocally about God, then we are limiting him / making him like a human • If we use language equivocally about God, we cannot be sure what the word means when applied to God • Are statements about God supposed to be cognitive – if so, what evidence proves / disproves them? • Are statements about God supposed to be non-cognitive – if so, do they have any meaning? The......

Words: 22600 - Pages: 91

Premium Essay

Philosophy and Design

...Philosophy and Design Pieter E. Vermaas • Peter Kroes Andrew Light • Steven A. Moore Philosophy and Design From Engineering to Architecture Pieter E. Vermaas Delft University of Technology Delft the Netherlands Andrew Light University of Washington Seattle USA Peter Kroes Delft University of Technology Delft the Netherlands Steven A. Moore University of Texas Austin USA ISBN 978-1-4020-6590-3 e-ISBN 978-1-4020-6591-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2007937486 © 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V. No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Printed on acid-free paper. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contents List of Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Design in Engineering and Architecture: Towards an Integrated Philosophical Understanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Peter Kroes, Andrew Light, Steven A. Moore, and Pieter E. Vermaas Part I Engineering Design ix 1 Design, Use, and the Physical and Intentional Aspects of Technical Artifacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......

Words: 165744 - Pages: 663

Premium Essay

Serial Killer

...VOLUME EDITOR S. WALLER is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Montana State University Bozeman. Her areas of research are philosophy of neurology, philosophy of cognitive ethology (especially dolphins, wolves, and coyotes), and philosophy of mind, specifically the parts of the mind we disavow. SERIES EDITOR FRITZ ALLHOFF is an Assistant Professor in the Philosophy Department at Western Michigan University, as well as a Senior Research Fellow at the Australian National University’s Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics. In addition to editing the Philosophy for Everyone series, Allhoff is the volume editor or co-editor for several titles, including Wine & Philosophy (Wiley-Blackwell, 2007), Whiskey & Philosophy (with Marcus P. Adams, Wiley, 2009), and Food & Philosophy (with Dave Monroe,Wiley-Blackwell, 2007). P H I L O S O P H Y F O R E V E RYO N E Series editor: Fritz Allhoff Not so much a subject matter, philosophy is a way of thinking.Thinking not just about the Big Questions, but about little ones too.This series invites everyone to ponder things they care about, big or small, significant, serious … or just curious. Running & Philosophy: A Marathon for the Mind Edited by Michael W. Austin Wine & Philosophy: A Symposium on Thinking and Drinking Edited by Fritz Allhoff Food & Philosophy: Eat,Think and Be Merry Edited by Fritz Allhoff and Dave Monroe Beer & Philosophy: The Unexamined Beer Isn’t Worth Drinking Edited by Steven D. Hales Whiskey &......

Words: 90119 - Pages: 361