Premium Essay

Death Penalty: Article Analysis

Submitted By
Words 213
Pages 1
In this article, I completely disagree with everything the author is saying. How would it make the justice system any better if they kill those who kill? As a matter of fact, I believe that the death penalty should be abolished and they should just suffer in jail. In addition, I feel as though this could also be bad for people that are innocent of a crime. For the most part, I feel like criminals should suffer in jail rather than being put the death penalty. I disagree with most of the article I don’t feel like the death penalty is the right thing to do. Although, the justice has to investigate and have enough information, I feel as though they could make an error, resulting in giving an innocent person the death penalty. Even though, most

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Group Assignment: Summery and Analysis

...reasons supporting this irrevocable form of punishment are, as well as the counter arguments that follow. In full support of the former, in his article titled “On Deterrence and the Death Penalty”[ Van Den Haag, Ernest (1969) On Deterrence and the Death Penalty. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 60(2) ], Ernest Van Den Haag outlines his thoughts which support the use of the death penalty and how it might deter heinous crimes against society. The first section of this paper will give a summery of Van Den Haag’s thoughts, which he outlined in the article, including the main points and arguments made which support his view. Following this summary, an in depth analysis of how the article relates to my personal beliefs and understanding of the topic will take place. Summary In section one of the article, the author brings up the point that the purposes of the death penalty must always be understood as being one of two things: doing justice or deterring others. Van den Haag points out that any other aim of a justice system, such as rehabilitation, would not be met by this form of punishment. It is his belief that opponents contesting the use of the death penalty must show that that neither purpose is met in order to illustrate that it should be abolished[ Van Den Haag, Ernest (1969) On Deterrence and the Death Penalty. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 60(2),pp.141]. He then outlines the purpose of his paper which is to challenge...

Words: 1470 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Reading the Essay

...Rhetorical Analysis Proposal The article that I have chosen to read and analyze for the rhetoric analysis paper is called “Death Penalty and Sentencing Information” by Dudley Sharp, the Death Penalty Resources Director of Justice for All. After reading through the document, the position is clearly in opposition of the death penalty. The paper is written to alert and educate students and adults of the violation of human rights that exist within the code of capital punishment. The author wrote the article in an attempt to make the reader consider their own personal beliefs on the death penalty, and also encourages the reader to delve further into the controversy that has been existent for quite some time. The rhetorical situation in this case is in the form of a well-backed, very detailed position paper about a highly controversial topic. The paper opens up the idea that there are more than just two opposing views, and offers a great deal of factual evidence in support of why the death penalty should not be a viable option of criminal justice. In reading this paper, I was able to identify several types of rhetorical elements. The logos present aree in the form of detailed, well-researched factual evidence that is brought to not only help the position of the author, but intrigue the reader and spur the reader to think about their own position on the matter. Pathos is used in the paper when the author turns to the moral, religious argument that opposes the death penalty. The idea...

Words: 288 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Death Penalty

...Denied: The Effects Being Ignored Death by lethal injection, death by electrocution, or any form of the death penalty given that people find to be fit for capital crimes is not a human’s right. We as humans do not have the right to end someone’s life based on the fact that they committed a crime. We have to take into accountability the countless amounts of lives that are impacted by this. Even on the international level, there are hundreds of countries who have abolished the death penalty completely. There is more to this than others think, yet they do not take the time to research or study the adverse effects of what this kind of punishment can cause. The death penalty violates the human right to life and causes a ripple effect that destroys the lives of the families of the individuals being executed. Death penalty supporters can be very profound with their opinions on what they believe is an excellent crime deterrent. In an article written for the Journal of Criminal Justice between May and June 2009, one of the authors by the name Shanhe Jiang stated, “Supporters of the death penalty argue that sentencing criminals to death deters others from committing a similar crime in the future.” He states that future crimes could indeed be deterred because of the continued support for the death penalty. In many cases, people see the death penalty as a form to punish those who commit murder, mass murder, rape and any other crime that warrants death. Supporters of this crime deterrent...

Words: 2025 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Is the Death Penalty Actually Effective?

...John Vera English 101H Professor Kaufman 23 October 2014 Is the Death Penalty Actually Effective? Of the many crimes one could commit, murder, felony manslaughter, espionage, genocide, and treason are a few of the crimes that can lead to one paying with the ultimate price, their own life. Lethal injection, gas chamber, firing squad, electrocution, and hanging are the methods of death afforded for those who commit such heinous acts. However, does knowing the possible consequences of capital offenses deter individuals from committing the crimes? Did it make you stop and think? In the United States the death penalty is used as a punishment for capital offenses. These specifically can vary from state to state, but commonly include first-degree murder, murder with special circumstances, rape with additional bodily harm, and the federal crime of treason. (Facts) The goal of the death penalty then, is to deter these crimes from even taking place, to be so feared that offenders think twice about committing such horrible crimes. But does it? In the following paper, the above question will attempt to be answered by looking at the background of capital punishment and the death penalty, the ideas behind it, viable alternatives, and finally, the effectiveness of the death penalty at deterring crime.  Early death penalty laws date back to the Eighteenth Century B.C.. The death penalty also had a heavy presence in the Fourteenth Century Hittite Code, the Seventh Century Draconian Code...

Words: 1473 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Do Executions Lower Homicide Rates

...edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=6901&context=jclc Radelet and Lacock's study 'Do Executions Lower Homicide Rates: The Views of Leading Criminologists' (Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 2009), compares the deterrence capability of the death penalty to that of long term imprisonment. The article begins by detailing the context of the study through highlighting the declining support for the deterrence hypothesis, due in large part to flawed empirical research. Radelet and Lacock offer a brief history of studies on...

Words: 1264 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Pros And Cons Of Abolish Death Penalty

...speaker once said, “Death is the wish of some, the relief of many, and the end of all”. Capital punishment is one of the most controversial topics in the world. Punishment is only effective if it is constantly enforced, and capital punishment can't be enforced all the time. People who commit crimes of personal violence may or may not premeditate the crime. Death is irreversible and there is nothing that will make the victim come back to life. Since 1990, in the United States, there has been an average of more than four cases each year in which an entirely innocent person was convicted of murder and sentenced to death. Notwithstanding, it can help control crime and in some cases, it can be just. It also gives closure to the families...

Words: 1369 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

How to Move

...English 104 10/23/2010 I will be making many changes on my rhetorical analysis essay. The first change that I will be making is the title I’m changing it from the original title of the article The Call for Moratorium Executions to Executions Mistakes. I feel that the new title really represents the article because, of what the objective of the article was and that was to help share the information on how many mistakes are made in the United States death penalty system. The next change that will be made is I will be taking out a lot of the Anthony Porter story in the second paragraph, and just leaving the main facts of the court case .I realize that there was way too much information on the court case of Anthony Porter that the reader did not necessarily need to know. The next change that will be made is I’m going to add two more paragraphs to the essay; the one paragraph that I’m adding is going to explain how the article relates to quoting authorities and narration. The article relates to quoting authorities, because the article really relies on facts of the death penalty from other sources to help strengthen the argument about the death penalty and executions. It relates to narration because of the Anthony Porter story that is told. The second paragraph that I’m adding will explain my work cited information and if I think the articles information was truthful; which I do I think the articles information was very useful in writing this essay. I’m very hopeful that with...

Words: 286 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Death Penalty

...Death Penalty Death penalty or capital punishment is the killing person by judicial process as a punishment for an offense. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offenses. People have different opinion about this issue. Some people support death penalty and some people are against death penalty. It is very hard to decide what is right thing with this issue, but both sides have good reasons why should and why we should not have death penalty. In “The Federal Death Penalty as a Safety Valve” the author asserts that “Fifteen states do not have a death penalty, and yet the federal government can federally prosecute capital cases on historically state-prosecuted violent crimes”(Mysliwiec 255). The author thinks that government has to much power when it comes to the death penalty. In U.S. states have power to decide do they want to have death penalty or not. This depends on who is majority in government. Usually republicans are for death penalty and democrats are against death penalty. In “Death penalty views in China, Japan and U.S” the author shows us the study where we can see the level of death penalty support and views on capital punishment among college students from China, Japan and U.S. (Jiang 1). This study is very interesting because we can see how young people from these countries are thinking and what is they opinion about this issue. It was found that Chinese respondents reported the highest level of death penalty support, followed...

Words: 1486 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Capital Punishment vs Human Rights

...this case, the state has the responsibility and the legal authority to punish the criminal or groups of criminals based on the given law. The punishment of the criminals may vary from simple fines and imprisonment to sever torture and the deprivation of life. Capital punishment or the death penalty has existed as part of the human justice system since ancient times. In these earlier periods people were sentenced to death as a punishment for crimes considered as first degree offenses by the state. These crimes were most of the time political as well as religious and the method of execution, in addition to different brutal ways, was mainly beheading. With additional types of crimes resulting in capital punishment and more sophisticated methods of execution, the death penalty has continued to be practiced in the 21st century. However, capital punishment, especially after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, has became an issue of greater debate among states, human right organizations and other nongovernmental organizations. Since 1948, the number of countries employing death penalty is decreasing and currently nearly half of the states in our world have abandoned the death penalty for all kinds of crimes. This paper will focus on presenting the diverging views regarding capital punishment mainly from a human right perspective. The study then tries to present facts, figures, and tries to look in brief the move towards its universal abolition. As far as the methods...

Words: 4873 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Death Penalty

...Hello everyone, this is Estelle Vogel death penalty expert and I would just like to say, Thank you Governor for giving me the opportunity to speak on the death penalty/ controlling crime. I would like to begin my analysis of whether to abolish the death penalty in the state Ellieland by giving my opinion of effectiveness. The definition of effective according to Webster’s Dictionary is “Producing a result that is wanted: having an intended effect.” Now by knowing this definition, the major question is, is the death penalty effective? Does the death penalty produce the desired result that publics want? The desired result is for Capital Crimes to be reduced and for tax dollars to be used correctly. I believe that having a death penalty is place is effective on these terms and without it we will not get the ‘desired’ results. The death penalty keeps society safe, deters other criminals, and it is more cost effective than life in prison. The moral response for all this, is we should protect our law abiding citizens rather than protect our violent, capital crime, offenders. The hardline has to be drawn somewhere and the death penalty is this hardline for effective crime control. Although Mr. Bradley Wilson makes sense of some of his view points, like “Mercy is morally valuable trait.” His views complicate the matter rather than simplify the case. The topic of mercy he uses throughout his five points is too abstract and difficult to debate. For example, maybe it is more merciful...

Words: 1185 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Death Penalty

...Is the Death Penalty a Fair and Effective Deterrent in the United States? Abstract The death penalty is the most severe punishment that may be imposed on an individual by the United States government. It denies a person one of their most basic human rights, which is the right to live. One of the purposes of the death penalty is to serve as a deterrent for other would-be criminals. There have been studies conducted to determine if the death penalty is effective in this regard. There is another point of disparity surrounding the death penalty related to the equality of its application. Are all citizens treated equal? This paper takes a closer look at the equality in the application of the death penalty and its effectiveness as a deterrent. Is the Death Penalty a Fair and Effective Deterrent in the United States? The death penalty came to the United States with the first European settlers and continued until the 1960’s. “The 1960s brought challenges to the fundamental legality of the death penalty. Before then, the Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments were interpreted as permitting the death penalty. However, in the early 1960s, it was suggested that the death penalty was a "cruel and unusual" punishment, and therefore unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment.” (Bohm, 1999) Since the 1960’s courts have been battling the issue of the death penalty. Currently there are 38 states that have provisions for the death penalty. What is the purpose of the death...

Words: 1575 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Capital Punishment

...Capital Punishment What is Capital Punishment? Capital Punishment which is also known as the Death Penalty. Death Penalty is the infliction of the death penalty as punishment for certain crimes according toDictionary.com. In the following essay will show why Capital Punishment is implemented to our society. Capital Punishment in any form is acceptable according to the following to the following articles will help justify this concept. To some people Capital Punishment would be considered an act of cruel and unusual punishment; while for others it is a system that should be considered needed in all the States in order to keep the country more safe for the people. Many states within the U.S. have performed executions of convicts since the early 1600’s. Views on capital Punishment vary with people in different ways; there are various organizations within the country that have different opinions on the subject, and organizations such as Religions, Political, or Humanitarian have diverse perspectives on the Death Penalty. “The death penalty is also most commonly argued to be a violation of the right to life or of the "sanctity of life." Many national constitutions and international treaties guarantee the right to life. the right to life demands that a life only be taken in exceptional circumstances, such as in self-defense or as an act of war, and therefore that it violates the right to life of a criminal if she or he is executed, since this is purely murder by the State” according...

Words: 1827 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Financial Ratio for P&G for Year Ended Dec 2011 and 2010

...BACHELOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION WITH HONOURS MAY / 2012 MPW2153 MORAL STUDIES MATRICULATION NO : 740704125850-001 IDENTITY CARD NO. : 740704-12-5850 TELEPHONE NO. : 016-3699817 E-MAIL : : madelinaj@maybank.com.my LEARNING CENTRE : SABAH LEARNING CENTRE Tables Of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Drug Laws 2.0 DISCUSSION 2.1 Global Overview on the Status of the Death Penalty for Drug Offences 2.2 The Pros of Death Penalty 2.2.1 Precedent Server 2.2.2 Just Punishment 2.2.3 Society Safety Concerns 2.2.4 Excess Sympathy 2.3 The Cons Of Death Penalty 2.3.1 Wrong Convictions 2.3.2 Costs 2.3.3 Deterrence 2.3.4 Rehabilitation 2.4 Religious Views On Death Penalty 2.4.1 Buddhism 2.4.2 Hinduism 2.4.3 Christianity 2.4.4 Islam 3.0 SUGGESTION TO REPLACE DEATH PENALTY 3.1 Life Imprisonment 3.2 Prison with Parole 3.3 Rehabilitation or Reformatories 3.4 Community Service Orders 4.0 SUMMARY REFERENCE 1.0 INTRODUCTION Law is a system of rules and guidelines which are enforced through social institutions to govern behavior. Laws are made by governments, specifically by their legislatures...

Words: 3083 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Death Sentence

...capital punishment. This is to counter the plenary provisions of Article 5 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 and its protocol in 1989 where the State parties believed that abolition of death penalty should be in the scale of enhancement of human dignity and progressive development of human rights and recalling Article 3 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted on 10th December, 1948 as well as Article 21 of our Constitution.1 It can be judicially said “I don’t punish you for killing the man but so that the other cannot be killed.” That is, the chief aim of capital punishment is to make deterrent to others for same crime . Now this concept is having a new direction. The Supreme Court and High Courts in India interpret the cases before giving the death sentence as rarest of rare cases. The Court moves its eye also for other aspects of society. The landmark cases where death sentences were awarded in India are Ranga Billa case2, Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi Assassination case, Laxman Nayak case 3 and the lastly, it was awarded to Dhananjoy Chatterjee on 14th August, 2004 in connection with Hetal Parikh case of West Bengal after the Supreme Court affirmed the death sentence awarded by lower courts and President also refused to grant him pardon. In the year 2003, Government laid a bill in the Parliament which proposed to add a provision of the punishment, like death sentence in the Drugs and Cosmetics Act as also it was |LL...

Words: 13513 - Pages: 55

Premium Essay

Lethal Justice

...of the death penalty is an issue that is passionately debated in the United States. Opponents of capital punishment often view the sentence to be cruel because it is ethically unjust. For example, ethical problems involve the moral issues in addition to whether it is ever right to execute another human. On the other hand, pro death penalty supporters regularly claim that the punishment is just because it may provide closure to the victims loved ones and it is the direct answer to a murder. Additionally, it is argued that as a result of the injection the supposed criminal may never commit further crimes. Both sides of the issue have strong claims to support...

Words: 1943 - Pages: 8