...The Death Penalty Debate Demonstrative communication is a silent way to communicate, which is key to interacting with another without speaking. Demonstrative communication, also known as nonverbal communication, is an imperative part of communicating with any person whether it is personal or business. It is a foundation of how two or more people respond and interact with another. Nonverbal communication involves both listening and responding while using subtle cues such as facial expressions, gestures, posture, and many others described later in this essay. Cheeseebro, O’Connor, & Rios (2010), contend listening involves attending to what the other person is stating and being opportunistic (p. 114). Responding is a form of giving and receiving feedback by not only verbal responses, but also nonverbal as well. For instance, if a person’s boss asks him or her to do something, he or she will respond by saying, “Yes, Sir.” By adding the nonverbal cues to the combination, he or she can roll their eyes and appear as though they do not want to do what is asked but will do it anyway. The person could have had a strong eye contact while smiling implementing he or she is happy to do the task. Nonverbal Communication Types According to the Helpguide.org website, there are seven types of demonstrative communication that includes facial expressions, body movements and posture; gestures, eye contact, touch, space, and voice. These are major components to effective...
Words: 1117 - Pages: 5
... The Death Penalty: Is It a Crime Deterrent? The death penalty is morally permissible punishment for those who kill. Intentionally taking the life of an innocent victim is so malicious that in short supply extenuating circumstances, the murderer surrenders his or her own right to live and society is justified in sentencing him to die. Every year more people are convicted and sentenced to death row. Many are executed. Once a jury has convicted a criminal of an offense they go to the second part of the trial, the punishment phase. If the jury recommends the death penalty and the judge concurs then the criminal will face a form of execution, lethal injection is the most common form used today. There was a period from 1972 to 1976 that capital punishment was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court (Honeyman & Ogloff, 1996). Their reason for this decision was that the death penalty was cruel and unusual punishment under the eighth amendment. The decision was reversed when new methods of execution were introduced (Honeyman & Ogloff, 1996). The Gallup pole lists public opinion of the life without parole as compared to the death penalty 48% versus 47% (Stop killing, 2007). Capital punishment is a difficult issue and there are as many different opinions as there are people. There are many murders each year. Does the death penalty create a deterrent for these criminals? There is a need for the death penalty. There are always two...
Words: 1499 - Pages: 6
...are many reasons why the death penalty should not be implemented. It is Inhumane, Ineffective against crime, proven not to be a deterrent, and it is Irreversible. These things will be explained by my group mates in their speeches. I however will be talking about the people that get convicted and sent to death row for crimes that they did not do. The danger that innocent people will be executed because of errors in the criminal justice system is getting worse. In the US a total of 69 people have been released from death row since 1973 after evidence of their innocence emerged. 21 condemned inmates have been released since 1993. There is no way to exactly tell how many people that were executed may have been innocent, because courts do not generally entertain claims of innocence when the defendant is dead. And lawyers move on to other cases where there is still a chance to save lives. However, I have a small list of people that were given the death penalty, which after their death, very strong evidence that proved their innocence turned up. There are many reasons why innocent people are convicted. There can be lack of eye-witness testimonies, heightened publicity, limited resources for defense attorneys, and there is always great pressure on police and prosecutors to solve cases which lead to them settling on the wrong suspects. I have come to the conclusion that the steady stream of errors that we see in cases in which defendants are sentenced to death is a consequence of our...
Words: 430 - Pages: 2
...today and defines our personality. From the time we are able to comprehend what death and murder was, we knew and understood that it was morally wrong and was stated so in the Bible. We ask ourselves this question: “Do any of us have the right to determine who gets the death penalty?” Many are against the death penalty, some are for it, it all depends what side fits their code of personal ethics. Personally, I am against it. The Bible states that “Thou shall not kill,” and I take that literally, no matter what the situation or circumstance. As early as 1700 BC was the first known death penalty laws. The Code of Hammurabi was a legal document from ancient Babylonia. Twenty-five crimes were punishable by death. Some of these crimes included adultery and helping slaves escape. Murder was not considered a punishable crime at this point. 1608 was when murder became a serious enough crime to get the death penalty. The Founding Fathers had included provisions to the Constitution including the Fifth and the Eighth Amendment, and the basic principles of government executions remained allowable under each separate state and federal governments. Thomas Jefferson attempted to change Virginia’s death penalty laws so that murder and treason were the only punishable offenses, but after a stormy debate, legislature defeated the bill by only one vote. Each state could choose to use the death penalty as a punishment if they wished. In 1790, the first person to be executed under...
Words: 1266 - Pages: 6
...capital sanctions are imposed on the state level for murder. Currently, thirty-two states have death penalty statutes. Of those thirty-two, only seven states carried out executions in 2014 (Bureau of Justice Statistics 2015). Those executions total 35 (Bureau of Justice Statistics 2015). As a result of the low number of executions carried out, experts in the United States have examined the efficiency of the death penalty. To accurately assess the economic costs of the death penalty, the difference between the costs...
Words: 3210 - Pages: 13
...The Death penalty is a necessity for the U.S. How would you feel if someone that you know was on death row? It's very unlikely to happen but, it's possible. There has been an ongoing debate, Whether the death penalty should be banned or still be an option for capital offenses. Out of the 50 states in America 31 states allow the death penalty. That means that 19 states have it banned. We are pretty divided on this issue.Some people believe that it is not okay to kill someone no matter what they did and other people believe in the “eye for an eye” phrase. You take a life. Your life should be taken. It’s a very controversial and touchy subject. It cost more for someone to be on death row because of all the court fees and death row can take a much longer time, than someone going in for life in prison. I personally believe that death row should NOT be banned. I believe...
Words: 999 - Pages: 4
...For thousands of years, the death penalty has served as part of the criminal justice system. The U.S uses the death penalty for prosecuting certain crimes. The debate over the death penalty has progressed for many centuries. However, in the past years, the debate has increased in the United States. In the recent past, opponents have held that the death sentence is ineffective, racist, barbaric, as well as against the American values. Conversely, the majority of people view the death punishment as a vital tool in fighting violent pre-meditated murder. Both sides have appealing arguments. Regardless, the support of the society for capital punishment is wanting. The death penalty is cruel and immoral. The society punishes murderers by killing...
Words: 1258 - Pages: 6
...jail time, but life sentences are the right thing. The 8th amendment does not support the death penalty. There is also the problem of innocent inmates that die, and then there is the money issue. There are a lot more reasons to keep the people off of death row and end the death penalty. One reason we should quit the death penalty is that 1 out of 25 inmates put to death are innocent and have been put up for the death penalty because of the lack of effort from their legal team. Either that or the state will deny their motion. They go to the death penalty to quick and do not even give it thought. In the case of a Death Row inmate Willie Poindexter...
Words: 976 - Pages: 4
...In the United States there are 31 states that allow the Death Penalty and 19 states that have banned the Death Penalty. The Death Penalty, also known as Capital Punishment, has been a topic that has been debated about whether it should be legal or if it should be banned for years. The Death Penalty is the punishment of execution, ordered to someone who commited a capital crime, like murder. There are many reasons as to why the Death Penalty should be legal but there are just as many reasons for why it should be banned. Death penalty should be legal because it gives closure to families that have been affected by those who have been convicted for a capital crime. In the article “Reform, Don't Repeal, the Death Penalty,” written by The Los Angeles...
Words: 1017 - Pages: 5
...The death penalty has been around for a long time. It has been and still is a substantial part in the punishment of those who did not obey the law. This punishment instilled fear in many, it made everyone ‘deathly’ afraid. It would put those who defied the laws in a ‘grave’ situation.(Pun). This is where the question come in as to whether the death penalty is Constitutional, or even humane. This act has been around ever since the eighteenth century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon and is still being used today for criminals who is seen to be lost souls, non redeemable. Of course, the saying, ¨an eye for an eye,¨ is reasonable. What if the people that have the person has been raised by and cared for one day suddenly died because...
Words: 927 - Pages: 4
...other ideas. In today’s society, capital punishment is a very controversial topic. Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is a legal sentence to die for serious criminal behavior. The death penalty is a controversial topic because some crimes are so odious that the perpetrator deserves to die and another view is that the authority makes mistakes and capital punishment cannot be reversed, once the convict is dead, he can not be brought...
Words: 1355 - Pages: 6
...2009), compares the deterrence capability of the death penalty to that of long term imprisonment. The article begins by detailing the context of the study through highlighting the declining support for the deterrence hypothesis, due in large part to flawed empirical research. Radelet and Lacock offer a brief history of studies on...
Words: 1264 - Pages: 6
...Great dialogues of Plato—Crito In this chapter, Plato talked about the dialogues between Socrates and Criton, Socrates’ best friend in his whole life. In this time, Socrates had already been put into prison by the unfair adjudgement in the court and he was waiting for the death penalty. When a Greek ship from Delos came back, he needed to get the death penalty. Before this time, Criton had visited Socrates for a few times, and tried to persuade him escape from this prison, but it was not worked. In the beginning of this dialogue, Socrates asked Criton, “Why have you come at this time of day”? He was sleeping and even forgot the time. Criton wanted to convince him leave the prison, and he had already found someone to help Socrates if he could escape. It must be the last time to get out from this prison, because the ship would come soon. However, Socrates refused his suggestion depending on his own opinion about moral and law. Then they began to debate by several aspects. Criton thought that he should leave the prison because he was guiltless. And he used a few ways to persuade him, just like, he let Socrates think of his sons and said “It is your power to bring them up and educate them, and now you will go off and leave them, and so far as you are concerned, they must take their life as they find it”. And they would be in orphan, if you leave them. He appealed by emotion to persuade him not giving up his life. On the other hand, Criton illustrated their friendship. If Socrates...
Words: 359 - Pages: 2
...Historical Perspective: Justice Policy-The Death Penalty Patrice Green Dr. Humphress Politics, Policy, and Ethics in the Public Sector April 26, 2013 The first confirmation of the death penalty laws date as far back as the Eighteenth Century in Babylon. Death penalty, legal infliction of death as a penalty for violating criminal law. The death penalty was codified for 25 different crimes. Such things carried out the death sentence as crucifixion, drowning, beating to death, burning alive, and impalement (Randa, 1997). The practice of the death penalty is as old as the government itself. The death penalty has not been considered controversial for most of history. Since ancient times most governments have punished a wide variety of crimes by death and have conducted executions as a routine part of the administration of criminal law. The Age of Enlightenment was the first significant movement to abolish the death penalty. Britain was very influential in America’s use of the death penalty. The European settlers that came to the new world are the one’s that brought the practice of capital punishment, death penalty. The first execution was recorded in the Jamestown Colony of Virginia in 1608. The Divine, Moral, and Martial Laws were enacted in 1612 by the Governor of Virginia, Sir Thomas Dale. The death penalty was established for minor offenses such as killing chickens, stealing grapes, and trading with Indians. It was Cesare Beccaria’s 1767...
Words: 1018 - Pages: 5
...sons on Death Row There is a major debate about the death penalty in America. Some people want to televise the execution, so they can turn more people against penalty. But others believe it will transform killers into “small screen superstars”. In the article “My Sons on Death Row” Kevin O’Sullivan writes about a mother whose sons are in prison on Death Row. She is the only mother in America, who has two sons on Death Row for separate murders. Jacqueline Downs is the mother of the two sons. She is devastated by the thought of losing her sons to the death penalty. “I believe Ernest is innocent and does not deserve to die. Bobby did kill his wife and it was a terrible thing to do. But he loved her and she drove him to it – she made him so jealous” (p. 2). She tries hard to convince people that the death penalty is horrible and that they should try to put themselves in her situation. She uses the word “innocent” and we get automatically more sympathy with her and her son. We do not know if he is innocent, but she wants him innocent so much that we almost become convinced that the death penalty should be abolished. O’Sullivan writes the article in the magazine “Mirror Woman”. The magazine’s readers are mostly women with children. It contains life stories built on real facts. There is a specific reason why O’Sullivan writes in exactly that magazine. He tries to inform the mothers about a real life story. He tries to put them in the situation of losing sons to the death penalty...
Words: 619 - Pages: 3
