Premium Essay

Death Penalty for Drug Trafficking Should Be Abolished

In: Social Issues

Submitted By nikolasbosko
Words 1143
Pages 5
DEATH PENALTY FOR DRUG TRAFFICKING SHOULD BE ABOLISHED

General Purpose : To inform
Specific Purpose : To inform my audience about why death penalty should be abolished
Organisational Pattern : Topical Order
Central Idea : Drug trafficking is indeed detrimental but it should be abolished because there’s a better alternative to it

INTRODUCTION I. A lady folded her new clothes and placed them neatly at the head of her bed. Then, she made a green bean soup while placing her Mcdonald’s burger on the stool. She didn’t eat that night. Instead, she spent the night talking to her friends and singing religious songs. That was how Donggui, a lady from China spent her night before undergoing a death penalty the next day II. Drug trafficking is indeed a heinous crime to commit but it would be unfair to subject the traffickers to a death penalty because there’s a better alternative to it III. I have made a thorough research on drug trafficking and the impact of the imposition of death penalties IV. For this topic, I will elaborate on what drug trafficking is, why death penalty should be abolished and what’s a better alternative to death penalty

(Transition : Let me begin with enlightening you with what drug trafficking is)

BODY

I. What is drug trafficking? A. According to section 2 of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, drug trafficking is the cultivation, manufacture, distribution and sale of any dangerous drug without any authority 1. The laws relating to illicit or entertainment drugs are strict and the penalty for breaking them is severe. Malaysian laws are very strict when it comes to illegal drug usage and trafficking 2. Sale of Drugs Act 1952 provides for a mandatory death penalty for convicted drug traffickers B. Why do people do drug trafficking if they know about its consequence? 1. Drug trafficking is deemed to be an…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Death Penalty

...views from many different people. Some argue that murderers should be executed and pay for the crimes they’ve committed while others believe life imprisonment is suffice. The Catholic Church condemns this type of punishment but those who have been victimized are crying for justice. Another argument is that the methods used for capital punishment is against the Eight Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. My intentions for this paper are to present and analyze both sides of the argument. Is the death penalty immoral or is it immoral not to impose it?   Introduction Capital punishment, also known as the death, has been one of the most controversial issue currently still under fire about its morality. Many believe it is both unethical and morally wrong for the government to take one’s life while others believe capital punishment is right and is needed to the deterrence of crime. This is a very controversial issue and brings up many different points of views from many different people. Some argue that murderers should be executed and pay for the crimes they’ve committed while others believe life imprisonment is suffice. The Catholic Church condemns this type of punishment but those who have been victimized, including their families, are crying for justice to be served. Another argument is that the methods used for capital punishment is against the Eight Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Is the death penalty immoral or is it immoral not to impose it? This paper......

Words: 1373 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Death Penalty Shouldn't Be Abolished

...then stuffed the body back in his trunk and drove home to his wife. Now he sits on death row, where he belongs. If the death penalty were to be abolished, this man, this brutal and horrid human being would be allowed to live in a prison where he is feed three times a day, enjoying luxuries that many innocent people in America cannot afford. It is also possible that he could be sentenced to 15-20 years in prison and then set free. Answer me this one simple question, would you want this man living in your neighborhood. As history tells us, capital punishment, whose definition is "the use of death as a legally sanctioned punishment," is an acceptable and efficient means of deterring crimes such as the one committed by David Brewer and many others. Today, the death penalty remains an effective method of punishment for murder and other heinous crimes. One cannot escape the fact that the death penalty has many flaws. But if you think about it there are flaws in all forms of penalties for crime. Weather the issue of the cost and time in order to carry out a “Death Sentence”, or the fact that many innocent people could be killed for something that they didn’t commit. Some will argue and say things like the death penalty is immoral. It is a form of cruel and unusual punishment and people greatly suffer both emotionally and physically before their execution. Most of the time, the death penalty is said to be a violation of the Eighth Amendment. This says that the U.S. cannot......

Words: 841 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Death Penalty

...Death Penalty 1 The Death Penalty in the United States Rebecca Bartley ENC3211-Report Writing Professor Johnson June 8, 2013 Death Penalty 2 Abstract Death penalty has had so many changes in the last 300 years many states still use the death penalty. There are many states that are abolishing it for any number of different reasons. Many now believe the death penalty is unconstitutional and also cruel and unusual punishment and it should no longer be used. Many believe life in prison is a better remedy than putting someone to death. Keywords: Death Penalty Death Penalty 3 The Death Penalty in the United States: How it has changed over years. The death penalty policies and ideas have changed from state to state over the last ten (10) years. Each state is now making the chose on whether to have or use the death penalty, or to abolish it for any number of reasons. There are a couple of reasons that the death penalty is being abolished: (1) the first would be that many states are starting to believe that it’s unconstitutional; and (2) the death penalty is being used less and less, there are more inmates who are sitting on death row for many years. “New Mexico repeated the death penalty in 2009, and replacing it with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole” (NM repeal, 2012).”With this new Mexico was the last state to implement true life without parole, and in the last five (5) years, five (5) states have repealed......

Words: 3186 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

...No matter where you are in the world, there is always going to be awful criminals such as murderers and sex offenders. The big debate is, what do we do to punish them? Some people say to give them a taste of their own medicine and sentence them to the death penalty. Others say to let them rot away in prison so they realize how wrong their decision was. I say that the death penalty should be abolished because many people are wrongfully convicted, it’s hypocritical, and it’s not a true punishment. According to the DPIC, since 1973 there have been 143 exonerees. It is hard to tell for sure how many people have been actually executed from a false accusation because once the execution has occurred, the case is typically forgotten and not further investigated. There are 10 known cases from which the person that was wrongfully convicted was executed (Innocence). We also need to keep in mind the families of the wrongfully accused. How would you feel if your son/daughter or brother/sister was sentenced to the death penalty for something they didn’t even do? Making them go to jail is bad enough, but them being killed is too tragic. Using capital punishment on a person who commits murder is hypocritical. Murder is against the law, so now when a person commits it we’re just going to kill them as well? That doesn’t make any sense. Trying to teach people that killing is wrong by killing those who commit murder just causes confusion and doesn’t solve anything. This is best stated by......

Words: 500 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Why Death Penalty Should Be Used

...get because he or she can be charged with 3rd degree murder or the murderer can be considered insane, thus not being guilty. Murder is stealing the chance for people to achieve their dreams. (Metaphor) An issue that has created lots of tension in society today, the death penalty is constantly questioned on whether or not it gives proper justice. Many see the death penalty as a violation of the Eighth Amendment in the Constitution, stating that it is a “cruel and unusual” form of punishment. However, according to disastercenter.com, 11,251,828 crimes were reported in 2007, with 16,929 being murder. That is an average of 46 murders per day, all around the United States. The sole purpose of the legal and criminal justice system of the United States is to protect its citizens. To do so, punishment must be given out to stop potential criminals. Although many oppose using the death penalty as punishment for murder due to the fact that there are options such as life in prison and it exhibiting a wrong message, the death penalty should be used for people who kill others because justice is better served, it is cheaper to use the death penalty in the long run, and it prevents criminals another chance to kill. The death penalty serves justice to the victim in that if the murderer is sent to jail, they are still provided with the necessities to live. According to Jonathan Richards on an article about Federal Prison states, “You will be fed three times a day by a guard or inmate......

Words: 1344 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Should the Death Penalty Be Mandatory for People That Kill Other People

...Should the death penalty be mandatory for people that kill other people PANNASASTRA UNIVERSITY OF CAMBODIA Commitment to excellence Commitment to excellence PROFESSIONAL WRITING HOMEWORK ESSAY Topic Should the Death Penalty Be Mandatory For People That Kill Other People? Submitted to Professor LY Meng Written By NHEN Socheath May 30, 2014 Brainstorming Process Should the death penalty be mandatory for people that kill other people? Proponents Opponent * Guarantee justice for the victims - A life in prison is enough * Decrease Crime Rates - Crime remains the same * An eye for an eye is the solution - give a second chance to change * Killing a murderer is fair - Killing is always wrong * Killing is not cruel - Killing is cruel * Practices sometime go wrong - Risk of taking innocent life * It is morally right and fair - Against religious ethics Proponents Opponent * Guarantee justice for the victims - A life in prison is enough * Decrease Crime Rates - Crime remains the same * An eye for an eye is the solution - give a second chance to change * Killing a murderer is fair - Killing is always wrong * Killing is not cruel - Killing is cruel * Practices sometime go wrong - Risk of taking innocent life * It is morally right and fair - Against religious ethics OUTLINING I. Introduction Thesis Statement: I personally do not agree that death penalty......

Words: 1535 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Death Penalty Is Brutal and Should Be Abolished

...for a specifically crime, and also an issue of in between controversial and dissenting in public nowadays. Capital punishment stated as death penalty, there is various form of death penalty which includes the gassing, hanging, shooting, electrocution, stoning, beheading, gas chamber, firing squad, and also comes with lethal injection. In the simplest way to define what capital punishment is, someone deprive his or her life. In my opinion, I think that capital punishment is considered as inhuman, cruel, an unfair cold blooded way of punishment, because it against the most basic of human rights. Well, to define what is basic of human rights, it can be explains that every people have the basic rights to be freedom and live, we have the rights to do the right things with the regardless of consequences in nationality or other more status. Nevertheless, although death penalty is executed for murders, but it is not the reason for government approval in use as legality, due the capital punishment destruction and also breaks the rules in order to protect the human rights. Therefore, I strongly agreed that capital punishment is brutal and it should be abolished. First and foremost, there are several arguments to put forward. Results in a system show that the necessity of legal and moral belief errors that must be kill some innocent victims. Death penalty deterrent people ineffectively especially when those innocent lives get destroyed. Based on the research which conducted by Bell......

Words: 1005 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Should Death Penalty Be Abolished in America?

...Should Death Penalty be abolished in America? Death penalty, or capital punishment, the most severe punishment for criminals, has been in the punishment system in countries all over the world for thousands of years. The history of death penalty is almost as long as the history of human beings. Death penalty was once considered as natural as life itself. It was usually applied to those criminals who had conducted grave crimes and no one would feel pity for the criminals in the past. However, with the development of human beings, different voices about death penalty appear more and more often. Some people argue that in modern society where life is highly valued, death penalty that deprives of a person’s life would be too cruel. Therefore, campaigns are launched for the purpose of abolishing death penalty. However, there are still some other people who firmly support death penalty. As a result, in today’s society, death penalty has become an extremely controversial issue, both sides of which have its own supporters and reasons. This paper explores to the different sides of death penalty, to find whether death penalty is necessary or not in today’s world. In the coin of death penalty, side A stands the firmly supporters of death penalty, claiming that death penalty is a cruel necessity in today’s world. A latest Gallup poll shows that 64% of the Americans support death penalty and 29% oppose it. For especially atrocious crimes, the support rate rises to 80% (Jones, Jeffrey M)....

Words: 2317 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Death Penalty Should Be Legal

...Bruce Fein, JD, General Counsel for the Center for Law and Accountability, in an American Bar Association website article titled "Individual Rights and Responsability - The Death Penalty, But Sparingly" (accessed June 17, 2008), offered the following: "Abolitionists may contend that the death penalty is inherently immoral because governments should never take human life, no matter what the provocation. But that is an article of faith, not of fact, just like the opposite position held by abolitionist detractors, including myself... The death penalty honors human dignity by treating the defendant as a free moral actor able to control his own destiny for good or for ill; it does not treat him as an animal with no moral sense, and thus subject even to butchery to satiate human gluttony. Moreover, capital punishment celebrates the dignity of the humans whose lives were ended by the defendant's predation." June 17, 2008 - Bruce Fein, JD Alex Kozinski, JD, Circuit Judge in the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in a Nov. 7, 2002 Hoover Institution "Interview," stated the following: "Immanuel Kant said it best. He said a society that is not willing to demand a life of somebody who has taken somebody else's life is simply immoral. So the question really... when the system works and when you manage to identify somebody who has done such heinous evil, do we as a society have a right to take his life? I think the answer's plainly yes. And I would go with Kant and I would......

Words: 577 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished?

...Should the Death Penalty be abolished? The international trend of stopping executing and abolishing the death penalty is obvious. For example, in 2011, there are nearly 200 countries in the world but only 21 countries execute the death penalty. In addition, 140 countries have already abolished the death penalty legally and practically (i.e. stop executing the death penalty). In the US, 17 states abolished the death penalty or sentenced the death penalty unconstitutional, including New Jersey (2007), New York (2007), New Mexico (2009), Illinois (2011) and Connecticut (2012). There are also a numbers of states that have suspended executions for many years. In 2007, United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution for the first time to implore all the members of the United Nations to stop using the death penalty. Since then, the United Nations General Assembly also declared the similar resolutions in 2008 and 2010 respectively and the most recent one was made in December 20, 2012. In 2007, 104 countries voted in favor of the resolution, while 54 voted against it. By 2012, there were 111 countries in favor, 41 countries against. The death penalty has two dimensions: one is the humanity between the individual life, another one is the rights among social communities and social members. The first dimension is a punishment executed by a specific public institution to the murderer once the murder happened between the the social members. In this dimension, the trace of the...

Words: 2041 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished?

...Date: Student: Teacher: Class: Should The Death Penalty Be Abolished? Thе Dеath Pеnalty is diffеrеnt from all othеr forms of punishmеnts in that it cannot bе rеvеrsеd and thеrеforе should bе abolishеd. Murdеrеrs arе not discouragеd from committing crimеs еvеn with thе dеath pеnalty as a punishmеnt. Thе high costs of thе dеath pеnalty arе also anothеr good rеason to gеt it out of govеrnmеnt's systеm. Thе dеath pеnalty goеs against somе of Thе Amеrican Constitution's laws. Thе Dеath Pеnalty is unfair and unjust and should bе abolishеd from Amеrica. Thе Dеath Pеnalty doеs not frightеn pеoplе from committing crimеs any morе еffеctivе than imprisonmеnt doеs. For thе dеath pеnalty to work thе offеndеr must sее it as a thrеat. Most pеoplе who commit murdеrs do so mostly in thе hеat of passion, undеr thе influеncе of drugs or alcohol and arе thinking vеry littlе about thе consеquеncеs. Thosе who actually plan thе murdеr also plan away of not gеtting caught so thеy do not havе to go through thе punishmеnt. Somе pеoplе commit murdеrs so thеy havе an еasy way out and not havе to commit suicidе. Othеrs sее it as a way to gain a bad namе, for thosе thе consequence is an attraction. This еxplains why capital punishmеnt еncouragеs homicidеs and why somе killеrs havе askеd to diе.Thе Dеath Pеnalty may havе an oppositе еffеct of what is intеndеd, aftеr a man in Florida was еxеcutеd, homicidеs......

Words: 938 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Drug Trafficking

...The CIA’s 50-year history of smuggling drugs into America is generating hatred for the United States throughout the world. Like Pontius Pilate, CIA washes their hands of the human tragedies and the corruption of government offices. They do this by remaining and by refusing to recognize the evidence, supporting corruption. For the past 50 years, the CIA has abused its power by deliberately drugging and corrupting America; and therefore should be prosecuted. According to the constitution, the people for the people originally created the government to be a group of elect “organizers” (not controllers) employed. One can say the CIA is a mutated part of the US government. The CIA was created when a Wall Street lawyer and banker wrote The National Security Act of 1947. Clark Clifford was the man who brought the CIA backed drug bank BCCI into the United States. CIA heroin trafficking moved in the 1960’s and 1970’s from the Turkey-Marseilles connection to the Asian connection. For decades until the 1950s, Asian government supported the opium trade, because money was flowing in as long as the opium was flowing out. By the early 1960s, the mountain areas of Southeast Asia produced most of the world's opium. In the early 1950’s in Southeast Asia, the CIA organized the Nationalist Chinese army to start a war against Communist China. This Chinese army became the opium distributors of the “Golden Triangle” (parts of Burma, Thailand and Laos). The “Golden Triangle” has the most......

Words: 3104 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Death Penalty

...Death Penalty Death penalty or capital punishment is the killing person by judicial process as a punishment for an offense. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offenses. People have different opinion about this issue. Some people support death penalty and some people are against death penalty. It is very hard to decide what is right thing with this issue, but both sides have good reasons why should and why we should not have death penalty. In “The Federal Death Penalty as a Safety Valve” the author asserts that “Fifteen states do not have a death penalty, and yet the federal government can federally prosecute capital cases on historically state-prosecuted violent crimes”(Mysliwiec 255). The author thinks that government has to much power when it comes to the death penalty. In U.S. states have power to decide do they want to have death penalty or not. This depends on who is majority in government. Usually republicans are for death penalty and democrats are against death penalty. In “Death penalty views in China, Japan and U.S” the author shows us the study where we can see the level of death penalty support and views on capital punishment among college students from China, Japan and U.S. (Jiang 1). This study is very interesting because we can see how young people from these countries are thinking and what is they opinion about this issue. It was found that Chinese respondents reported the highest level of death penalty support,......

Words: 1486 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Death Penalty

...Discuss whether the death penalty in serves a relevant purpose in criminal proceedings in Malaysia. Over the centuries, laws and public attitudes relating to torture have evolved. It is no longer permissible to use thumbscrews or the rack as legally sanctioned means of interrogation and punishment. Attitudes toward the death penalty are also changing, and as more and more countries abolish capital punishment, the guillotine, the garrotte and the noose are being relegated to museums, alongside medieval instruments of torture. As we know, the death penalty is the sentence of death upon a person by the state as a punishment for a crime. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offences. The term capital originates from the Latin capitalis, literally “regarding the head”. Hence a capital crime was originally one punished by the severing the head from the body. Capital punishment in Malaysia applies to murder, drug trafficking, treason, and waging war against Yang di-Pertuan Agong (the King). Recently, the law has been extended to include acts of terrorism. Any terrorists, and anyone who aids terrorists, financially or otherwise, are liable to face the death penalty. Only High Courts have the jurisdiction to sentence someone to death. Juvenile cases involving the death penalty are heard in High Courts instead of the juvenile court where other juvenile cases are heard. Appeals to the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court are automatic. The......

Words: 1822 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Death Penalty

...The Death Penalty Nikole Smith SOC 101: Introduction to Sociology Geoff Wood 10/04/2010 “Capital punishment, the death penalty, or execution is the killing of a person by judicial process as a punishment for an offense. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offences.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment#In_specific_countries). The death penalty does serve as a deterrent crime. Crime rates in the Unites States are so high for many reasons. One reason being people are stupid enough to continue doing crimes and building up a sentence that they may not know exists, but does. The punishment of the crime depends on how bad the crime is. The death penalty applies to crimes like murder; not crimes like stealing a sucker or hitting a woman or severely beating someone. If you kill someone and maybe someone else, then you may be more likely to serve the death penalty. Some countries that believe in the death penalty are Iran, China, Singapore, Afghanistan, India, Japan, and several other countries throughout the whole world. “Capital punishment in China is currently administered for a variety of crimes, but the vast majority of executions are for cases of either aggravated murder or large scale drug trafficking. The People's Republic of China executes the highest number of people annually, although other countries (such as Iran or Singapore) have higher execution rates per capita. Article 49 in the Chinese criminal code...

Words: 648 - Pages: 3