Free Essay

Demsetz View vs Traditional View

In: Business and Management

Submitted By ksay2lzg
Words 2324
Pages 10
Numerous empirical studies have sought to evaluate the relationship between market structure and performance. The traditional structure-conduct-performance approach (SCP) alone seems hard to reconcile with the true development of the relationship. There are two main stream of hypothesis that studies the relationship between. On one hand, the collusion hypothesis, widely known as SCP (Bain, 1995), stipulates that as a result of market concentration which facilitates the collusion between firms of the industry, greater benefits like higher firm profits arise. On the other hand, Demsetz (1973) provide an alternative reasoning for the positive relationship between concentration and profitability. The efficient structure hypothesis suggests that market structure is dictated by the efficiency of the operating firms. The most efficient firms reap higher profitability and market share which eventually lead to higher market concentration. This review will present some literature findings which are either in favour of or against Demsetz view of efficiency hypothesis.

Efficient-structure hypothesis stipulates that bigger market share is the outcome of efficient operations of the firms. It is subdivided into two forms of hypothesis. Under X-efficiency hypothesis, firms with superior management or production processes operate at lower costs and eventually gain more profits. Following-on higher market shares may result in higher market concentration. On another hand, scale-efficiency hypothesis posits that firms have comparable management technology and production but operate at respective optimal levels of economies of scale. A company’s cost position relies upon its relative market share. The higher the relative market share, the lower the company’s unit costs are and the higher the profit margins.
Banks
The efficient-structure theory also includes two hypotheses – the X-efficiency and scale efficiency hypotheses. The X-efficiency hypothesis argues that banks with better management and practices control costs and raise profit, moving the bank closer to the best-practice, lowerbound cost curve. The scale-efficiency hypothesis argues some banks achieve better scale of operation and, thus, lower costs. Lower costs lead to higher profit and faster growth for the scale-efficient banks.

Demsetz
Demsetz (1973, 1974) : positive relationship between market concentration and profitability reflects the exercise of market power, then it should affect all firms equally.

According to the efficiency hypothesis, market share is the consequence of efficiency rather than its cause. Differences in profitability among firms are due to higher efficiency. Efficient firms obtain large market share and earn high profits induce a causal association between size and profitability. Firms offering products that offer customers greater value enjoy gains in market share. Better managed firms that have a competitive advantage grow faster than rival firms. Firms with superior skill and foresight gain market share through lower prices or through better products. Caves and Porter (1977) and Woo and Cooper (1981,1982) provide evidence that smaller-share competitors are equally or even more profitable than larger rivals. Efficiency

1. More efficient producers typically enjoy higher profits because they are able to charge lower prices and thus capture larger market shares and economic rents. There are two measures of efficiency, namely X-efficiency and scale efficiency which give rise to profitability. Large firms more profitable than small firms.

According to efficient hypothesis, banks attain higher profits by having efficiency in their superior management or large scale, cost reduction production technologies.
Berger (1995) devised a model that incorporates two forms of efficiency hypothesis and two forms of collusion hypothesis using data of bank over the 1980 to 1989 period. They use income statement data and individual bank balance sheet to approximate a frontier cost function to derive the assessment of efficiency .Profitability is measured using both return on assets and return on equity. Independent variables comprise of concentration measured by HH index, measures of efficiency effects on managerial aptitude and measures of effect on average cost of economies of scale. There is support for X-efficiency, not for scale-efficiency. Profitability is not related to concentration but positively related to market share.

Gale (1972) studies the effect of market share on the rate of return of selected firms operating in different market environments.

The table above demonstrates the effect of share and quality on relative direct costs (the estimated per-unit materials, production, and distribution costs of the business as a percentage of the costs of its competitors, with administrative and marketing expenses excluded). By altering 1 standard deviation in the share index, relative direct costs for both groups change by 1-2%. From the share/relative direct cost results he concludes that higher-share businesses tend to be more profitable largely due to having lower direct costs. This is in line with the X-efficiency hypothesis. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/antibull27&div=5&g_sent=1&collection=journals http://econpapers.repec.org/article/tprrestat/v_3a54_3ay_3a1972_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a412-23.htm

Using the PIMS database, Buzzell, Gale and Sultan (1975) study found a positive relationship between market share and profitability. The discovery from PIMS data is that a firm with a market share of 40 percent will reign a profit margin twice as high as the competitor 10 percent of the market (Simon 2010). Therefore, the strategic implication of these findings is that firms should strive to achieve a higher market share in order to reap the advantages of higher economies of scale and experience.
[Buzzell, R.D, B.T. Gale and R.G.M. Sultan (1975), Market Share – A Key to Profitability, Harvard Business Review, 53 (January – February), 97-106] https://hbr.org/1975/01/market-share-a-key-to-profitability/ar/1

2. Some paper support SCP which is not in line with Demsetz view. Collusion hypothesis stipulates concentration affects profitability as a result of market power. There is positive relationship between profitability and concentration, and no relationship between profitability and market share. Concentration ratio proxies collusion.

Using call report data from Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Jeon and Miler (2005) study the relationship between several measures of bank concentration at the state level and average performance of banks within that state from 1976 to 2000. The average return on equity of all banks in the state is the profit measure. The % of assets held by the five largest and ten largest banks in a state along with Herfindahl-Hirschman index of concentration in each state and the District of Columbia are the three measures of concentration. They find a positive relationship between bank concentration in a state and the average return on equity within that state, even after tuning for economic environment within that state. Temporal causality tests infers that bank concentration causes bank profitability. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1066&context=econ_wpapers
In an analysis of statistics for a cross section of 32 four-digit food manufacturing industries for 1958, Collins and Preston (1966) concludes that average industry price-cost margins are positively correlated to the degree of concentration. The relationship are continuous and curvilinear. Initially, there is no systematic increases in price-cost margins as concentration rises in the lower ranges, however as concentration reaches above a certain level (in the 30 to 40% range for four firms) price-cost margins quickly picks up. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2097552?origin=JSTOR-pdf http://www.jstor.org/stable/2097552

Molyneux & Llyod-Williams (1994) conduct a study with respect to Spanish banking industry using pooled and annual data from year 1986–1988. The results generally support the traditional SCP hypothesis as justification for the market behaviour of Spanish banks. This proposes that the support of additional concentration in Spanish banking by government and Bank of Spain might unambiguously reduce the level of competition in the system and cannot be warranted on efficiency grounds. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378426694900027 Concentration may be the result of the greater efficiency of major companies large firm has higher profits than small firms in the same concentrated industry The variation of profitability among large and small firms illustrates the role of efficiency in the positive structure-profit relationship.Large firms make higher returns due to their efficiency. 3. There is no relationship between concentration and profitability.
Lawrence & Anoop (1995) study the relationship between concentration and performance for largest European banks using the test developed in Berger and Hannan (1993) but with different approach. First, they estimate the deviations from a stochastic cost frontier under the assumption that errors are distributed half-normal. The error terms are then taken to obtain the measures of X-efficiency for each bank. The stochastic cost frontier is also used to retrieve measures of scale-inefficiency. They do not use data of individual bank branches or very insignificant banks. Hence, the expected signs of the coefficients in the estimation of Eq. (1) are as follows: X-EFFi > 0, S-EFFi > 0, CONC = 0 and MS = 0. More efficient firms will have higher profits and the signs of the coefficients of X-EFF, and S-EFFI should be positive. If net interest margin is used as the measure of performance, the signs of the efficiency measures should be negative because more efficient banks should be able to offer more attractive loan and deposit rates to customers. In spite of the competitive interest margins, banks will still generate larger profits than those that are operating inefficiently. Although efficiency leads to higher market shares and market concentration, the zero coefficients indicate that market structure has no direct effect on prices and profits. By using a model which incorporates efficiency directly, we assume the following: prices are set competitively and efficiency is a function of strictly lower costs and banks operating at efficient scale levels; and market structure variables CONC and MS have no relationship with profits conditional on efficiency (Berger and Hannan, 1993).

Demsetz (1973,1974) states that if the profitability of large firms in concentrated industries is greater than the profitability of small firms in concentrated industries, then the relationship between profitability and concentration is due to a relationship between efficiency and profitability. Using the data on 1963 US Internal Revenue Service data for 95 industries, he finds that the profitability of firms in size classes R1, R2 and R3 is not related to concentration. Nevertheless, for the largest size class, R4 profitability and concentration exhibits positive relationship.
Ravenscraft (1983) approaches the firm size issue indirectly by taking into account the relative effects of market share and concentration on profits. In an analysis of 1975 US Data for 3186 lines of business (LOB) in 258 Federal Trade Commission (FTC), price-cost margins are positively related to LOB market shares, nonetheless the opposite holds true for seller concentration. Ravenscraft conjectures that profit concentration relationship in industry regressions reveals the upper hand of large sellers reaping more profits relative to smaller competitors. Having higher returns to advertising and assets for sellers with more market shares, it reflects the positive market share-profit relationship.

4. There is positive relationship between market share and profitability where market share act as a proxy for efficiency/ When market share, concentration and profitability are regressed, market share will outweigh concentration.
Gale (1972) finds that high market share is associated with high rates of return and that the effect of share on profitability depends on other firm and industry characteristics. The bigger the firm or the more concentrated or moderate growth the competitive environment is, the greater the influence of share on profitability. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1924568
Smirlock (1985) models bank profitability as a function of market share, concentration and an interaction term between market share and concentration as well as several control variables for over 2700 unit state banks from time period 1973-1978. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1992507

The equation is estimated with market share (MS) as the only structural variable, that is, with the restriction a2 = a3 = 0 imposed. These results are reported in the middle three rows of Table 1. Across all profit rate meanings, the coefficient on market share is significant and positive at 1 percent level where the coefficient on concentration is negative, giving the control variables are in line with anticipations. The explanatory power of these equations beats those where concentration (CR) is the market structure variable. Once market share is accounted for properly, concentration means nothing to explaining bank profit rates. He finds that market share is positively related to profitability while there is no relationship between concentration and profitability.

Gale & Branch (1982) test the relationship between profitability, market share and concentration using data covering period from 1970 to 1979 in some cases and four years of data in most cases. ROI is the proxy for profitability index.

Although explanatory power of concentration is statistically significant at 99% level, its relation to ROI is very modest (R² of less than 2%). When market share and concentration are inputted concurrently, the concentration coefficient falls to insignificance and changes signs, whereas the share coefficient is still highly significant. An interaction term (the product of share and concentration) do not pass a significance test with or without concentration in the equation. Hence, market share variable greatly dominates concentration which has explanatory power of almost 20% against concentration which is less than 2%, and eventually reaches zero once share has explained what it can.

This review is centred on Demsetz view of efficient structure paradigm where several literature written by researchers who support the efficient structure model criticise the SCP model since the relationship between market share, concentration and efficiency is excluded.

Three recent studies, one of which used company-wide data 0 did, however, find a positive relationship between ROI and market share. B. Gale, "Market Share and the Rate of Return," Review of Economics and Statistics 54 (November 1972): 412-23; R. Buzzell, B. Gale, and G. Sultan, "Market Share-A Key to Profitability," Harvard Business Review 53 (January-February 1975): 97-106; R. Caves, B. Gale, and M. Porter, "Interfirm Profitability Differences: Comment," Quarterly Journal of Economics 91 (November 1977): 667-75.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Dynamic Capabilities of Firms

...[pic] Ecole Superieures Libre des Sciences Commerciales Appliquees Doctorate of Business Administration Human Capital Management Paper on Dynamic Capabilities of Firms Presented to: Dr. Sherif Delawar By Mohamed Antably March 2012 Cairo, Egypt. Abstract: From one hand the dynamic capabilities of firms are the sources and methods of wealth creation and capture by private enterprise firms operating in environments of rapid technological change. Other hand, Human capital ultimate objectives are linking HR practices and knowledge with goals of the firm to achieve and develop Competitive advantages. Accordingly, linking both statements would generate that HC is not only working to achieve the organizations objectives and but also to formalize, maintain and develop the firm dynamic capabilities. HC should also work on sharing and collecting success stories, lessons learnt and implicit individuals' knowledge into institutional explicit knowledge. The competitive advantage of firms is seen as resting on distinctive processes (ways of coordinating and combining which is more difficult among horizontal levels but easy in the vertical levels applying the chain of command), shaped by the firm's asset positions (such as the firm's portfolio of difficult-to-trade knowledge assets and complementary assets), and the evolution path(s) it has adopted or inherited. The importance of path dependencies is......

Words: 4356 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Elements of a Theoretical Framework for Public Sector Accounting

..._______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ Report Information from ProQuest 16 September 2014 22:51 _______________________________________________________________ 16 September 2014 ProQuest 目录 1. Elements of a Theoretical Framework for Public Sector Accounting............................................................ 1 16 September 2014 ii ProQuest 第 1 个文档,共 1 个 Elements of a Theoretical Framework for Public Sector Accounting ProQuest 文档链接 摘要: The development of a concept of community assets (used to describe government-managed assets of an infrastructural, cultural, or environmental nature) can contribute to the development of a new theoretical framework for public sector accounting and potentially for private sector accounting as well. An important feature of this framework is that recognition of assets based on common property alongside private property lends greater visibility to the communitarian perspective, with its emphasis on shared values and common life, and to social as well as technical concerns. In addition, by distinguishing what management can control from what they cannot control, a concept of community assets as distinct from ordinary fixed assets could permit a fairer system of accountability and clarify the controversial issues of depreciation in the public sector. 链接: Check local library holdings 全文文献: Despite the ancient origins of......

Words: 10977 - Pages: 44

Premium Essay

Financial Risk Optimal

...Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure Michael C. Jensen Harvard Business School MJensen@hbs.edu And William H. Meckling University of Rochester Abstract This paper integrates elements from the theory of agency, the theory of property rights and the theory of finance to develop a theory of the ownership structure of the firm. We define the concept of agency costs, show its relationship to the ‘separation and control’ issue, investigate the nature of the agency costs generated by the existence of debt and outside equity, demonstrate who bears costs and why, and investigate the Pareto optimality of their existence. We also provide a new definition of the firm, and show how our analysis of the factors influencing the creation and issuance of debt and equity claims is a special case of the supply side of the completeness of markets problem. The directors of such [joint-stock] companies, however, being the managers rather of other people’s money than of their own, it cannot well be expected, that they should watch over it with the same anxious vigilance with which the partners in a private copartnery frequently watch over their own. Like the stewards of a rich man, they are apt to consider attention to small matters as not for their master’s honour, and very easily give themselves a dispensation from having it. Negligence and profusion, therefore, must always prevail, more or less, in the management of the affairs of such a company. — Adam......

Words: 28422 - Pages: 114

Premium Essay

The Relevance/Irrelevance Issue

...This focus has questioned the relevance of the information contained in financial statements for investors’ prediction of the securities market values/stock prices and has ushered in and perpetuated a line of research that views capital market valuation as the basis for determining the numbers to be incorporated in financial statements. However, the relevance of the financial statements...

Words: 15491 - Pages: 62

Premium Essay

Oil Industry Vertical Integration

...They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its Members. Copyright 0 1995 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies All rights reserved. No palt of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any fomi or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior pemiission of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. This publication is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise. be lent, resold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any fonii of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without D similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. ISBN 0 948061 90 1 ABSTRACT When asked to rank industries by their degree of vertical integration, most people would agree that the oil industry should come top of the list. Underlying this belief is the fact that integration and size tend to be closely associated. As the oil industry is so large and oil companies so visible and perceived as so profitable, the common belief is a correlation between vertical integration, size and performance. If a dynamic view is taken of this cross-sectional observation we would expect to find an oil industry populated only by fully integrated very large companies....

Words: 11134 - Pages: 45

Premium Essay

Sience

...Economica (2015) 82, 1177–1216 doi:10.1111/ecca.12156 Family Firms, Corporate Governance and Export By RAOUL MINETTI†, PIERLUIGI MURRO‡ and SUSAN CHUN ZHU† †Michigan State University ‡Lumsa University Final version received 20 June 2015. This paper investigates the effects of family ownership on export using rich data on Italian firms. We find that family ownership increases the probability that firms export. This benefit is especially pronounced when family owners retain control rights and seek the support of external managers. The results suggest that families better internalize the long-run benefits of internationalization, but that their limited competencies attenuate this benefit in high-tech industries and in remote and unfamiliar export markets. Family firms also exhibit some tendency to enter foreign markets in a progressive way (sequential exporting) and through limited collaborations with foreign firms and intermediaries. INTRODUCTION In a global economy, export markets are an important venue for firms to grow. For this reason, scholars and policymakers intensely debate the determinants of firms’ international expansion. There is a growing consensus that firms’ corporate governance influences their ability to export. In recent editorials on the costs and benefits of family firms, The Economist (2012, 2013) mentions the successful experience of German and Northern European family firms in international markets, arguing that these firms have led the export...

Words: 22067 - Pages: 89

Premium Essay

Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure

...Journal of Financial Economics 3 (1976) 305-360. Q North-Holland Publishing Company THEORY OF THE FIRM: MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR, AGENCY COSTS AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE Michael C. JENSEN and William H. MECKLING* University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, U.S.A. Received January 1976, revised version received July 1976 This paper integrates elements from the theory of agency. the theory of property rights and the theory of finance to develop a theory of the ownership structure of the firm. We define the concept of agency costs, show its relationship to the ‘separation and control’ issue, investigate the nature of the agency costs generated by the existence of debt and outside equity, demonstrate who bears these costs and why, and investigate the Pareto optirnality of their existence. We also provide a new definition of the firm, and show how our analysis of the factors influencing tht- creation and issuance of debt and equity claims is a special case of the supply side of the completeness of markets problem. The directors of such [joint-stock] companies, however, being the managers rather of other people’s money than of their own, it cannot well be expected, that they should watch over it with the same anxious vigilance with which the partners in a private copartnery frcqucntly watch over their own. Like the stewards of a rich man, they are apt to consider attention to small matters as not for their master’s honour, and very easily give thcmsclvcs a dispensation from...

Words: 27266 - Pages: 110

Premium Essay

Negotiation

...The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture Michele J. Gelfand Jeanne M. Brett Editors STANFORD BUSINESS BOOKS The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture Edited by miche le j. ge lfand and jeanne m. brett Stanford Business Books An imprint of Stanford University Press Stanford, California 2004 C Stanford University Press Stanford, California C 2004 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford, Jr., University. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system without the prior written permission of Stanford University Press. Printed in the United States of America on acid-free, archival-quality paper Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The handbook of negotiation and culture / edited by Michele J. Gelfand and Jeanne M. Brett. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0-8047-4586-2 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Negotiation. 2. Conflict management. 3. Negotiation—Cross-cultural studies. 4. Conflict management—Cross-cultural studies. I. Gelfand, Michele J. II. Brett, Jeanne M. bf637.n4 h365 2004 302.3—dc22 2003025169 Typeset by TechBooks in 10.5/12 Bembo Original printing 2004 Last figure below indicates year of this printing: 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 04 Contents List of Tables and Figures Foreword Preface xi xv ix...

Words: 186303 - Pages: 746

Free Essay

Code

...C O D E C ODE v e r s i o n 2 . 0 L A W R E N C E L E S S I G A Member of the Perseus Books Group New York Copyright © 2006 by Lawrence Lessig CC Attribution-ShareAlike Published by Basic Books A Member of the Perseus Books Group Printed in the United States of America. For information, address Basic Books, 387 Park Avenue South, New York, NY 10016–8810. Books published by Basic Books are available at special discounts for bulk purchases in the United States by corporations, institutions, and other organizations. For more information, please contact the Special Markets Department at the Perseus Books Group, 11 Cambridge Center, Cambridge MA 02142, or call (617) 252-5298, (800) 255-1514 or e-mail special.markets@perseusbooks.com. CIP catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN-10: 0–465–03914–6 ISBN-13: 978–0–465–03914–2 06 07 08 09 / 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Code version 1.0 FOR CHARLIE NESSON, WHOSE EVERY IDEA SEEMS CRAZY FOR ABOUT A YEAR. Code version 2.0 TO WIKIPEDIA, THE ONE SURPRISE THAT TEACHES MORE THAN EVERYTHING HERE. C O N T E N T S Preface to the Second Edition Preface to the First Edition Chapter 1. Code Is Law Chapter 2. Four Puzzles from Cyberspace PART I: “REGULABILITY” ix xiii 1 9 Chapter 3. Is-Ism: Is the Way It Is the Way It Must Be? Chapter 4. Architectures of Control Chapter 5. Regulating Code PART II: REGULATION BY CODE 31 38 61 Chapter 6. Cyberspaces Chapter 7. What Things......

Words: 190498 - Pages: 762

Premium Essay

Management Accounting

...Handbook of Management Accounting Research Volume 3 Edited by CHRISTOPHER S. CHAPMAN Imperial College London, UK ANTHONY G. HOPWOOD University of Oxford, UK MICHAEL D. SHIELDS Michigan State University, USA AMSTERDAM – BOSTON – HEIDELBERG – LONDON – NEW YORK – OXFORD PARIS – SAN DIEGO – SAN FRANCISCO – SINGAPORE – SYDNEY – TOKYO Elsevier The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, UK First edition 2009 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone ( 44) (0) 1865 843830; fax ( 44) (0) 1865 853333; email: permissions@elsevier.com. Alternatively visit the Science and Technology Books website at www.elsevierdirect.com/rights for further information Notice No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record......

Words: 187223 - Pages: 749

Premium Essay

Asked Frequently Questions

...tly A sk ed Fr equen in s Question orporate C FinanCe io, a llocch ur izio D uiry, M a lv i Pa sc a l Q tonio Sa Le Fur , A n Ya nn From the team behind Pierre Vernimmen’s % = Corporate FinanCe + 3 Frequently Asked Questions in Corporate Finance Frequently Asked Questions in Corporate Finance Pierre Vernimmen, Pascal Quiry, Antonio Salvi, Maurizio Dallocchio and Yann LeFur A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication This edition first published in 2011 Copyright  2011 Pierre Vernimmen Registered office John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com The rights of Pierre Vernimmen, Pascal Quiry, Antonio Salvi, Maurizio Dallocchio and Yann LeFur to be identified as the authors of this work have been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Wiley publishes in a variety of print and electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some material included......

Words: 120046 - Pages: 481

Premium Essay

International Finance

...Sixth Edition INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Cheol S. Eun Bruce G. Resnick International Financial Management Sixth Edition The McGraw-Hill/Irwin Series in Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Finance and Economics Sloan School of Management Massachusetts Institute of Technology Consulting Editor FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Adair Excel Applications for Corporate Finance First Edition Block, Hirt, and Danielsen Foundations of Financial Management Fourteenth Edition Brealey, Myers, and Allen Principles of Corporate Finance Tenth Edition Brealey, Myers, and Allen Principles of Corporate Finance, Concise Second Edition Brealey, Myers, and Marcus Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Sixth Edition Brooks FinGame Online 5.0 Bruner Case Studies in Finance: Managing for Corporate Value Creation Sixth Edition Chew The New Corporate Finance: Where Theory Meets Practice Third Edition Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger Finance: Applications and Theory First Edition Cornett, Adair, and Nofsinger Finance: M Book First Edition DeMello Cases in Finance Second Edition Grinblatt (editor) Stephen A. Ross, Mentor: Influence through Generations Grinblatt and Titman Financial Markets and Corporate Strategy Second Edition Higgins Analysis for Financial Management Ninth Edition Kellison Theory of Interest Third Edition Kester, Ruback, and Tufano Case Problems in Finance Twelfth Edition Ross, Westerfield, and Jaffe Corporate Finance Ninth......

Words: 186186 - Pages: 745

Premium Essay

Accounting

...Seventh Edition Accounting for Decision Making and Control Jerold L. Zimmerman University of Rochester To: Conner, Easton, and Jillian ACCOUNTING FOR DECISION MAKING AND CONTROL, SEVENTH EDITION Published by McGraw-Hill, a business unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Previous editions © 2009, 2006, and 2003. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written consent of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., including, but not limited to, in any network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning. Some ancillaries, including electronic and print components, may not be available to customers outside the United States. This book is printed on acid-free paper. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 DOW/DOW 1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 ISBN MHID 978-0-07-813672-6 0-07-813672-5 Vice President & Editor-in-Chief: Brent Gordon Vice President of EDP: Sesha Bolisetty Editorial Director: Stewart Mattson Sponsoring Editor: Dick Hercher Marketing Manager: Sankha Basu Editorial Coordinator: Rebecca Mann Project Manager: Erin Melloy Design Coordinator: Brenda A. Rolwes Cover Designer: Studio Montage, St. Louis, Missouri Production Supervisor: Sue Culbertson Media Project Manager: Balaji Sundararaman Compositor: MPS Limited, A Macmillan......

Words: 209552 - Pages: 839

Premium Essay

Transsctions and Economics

...Transactions and Strategies Economics for Management This page intentionally left blank Transactions and Strategies Economics for Management ROBERT J. MICHAELS Mihaylo College of Business and Economics California State University, Fullerton Australia • Brazil • Japan • Korea • Mexico • Singapore • Spain • United Kingdom • United States Transactions and Strategies: Economics for Management Robert J. Michaels Vice President of Editorial, Business: Jack W. Calhoun Publisher: Joe Sabatino Sr. Acquisitions Editor: Steve Scoble Supervising Developmental Editor: Jennifer Thomas Editorial Assistant: Lena Mortis Sr. Marketing Manager: John Carey Marketing Coordinator: Suellen Ruttkay Marketing Specialist: Betty Jung Content Project Manager: Cliff Kallemeyn Media Editor: Deepak Kumar Sr. Art Director: Michelle Kunkler Frontlist Buyer, Manufacturing: Sandee Milewski Internal Designer: Juli Cook/ Plan-It-Publishing, Inc. Cover Designer: Rose Alcorn Cover Image: © Justin Guariglia/Corbis © 2011 South-Western, Cengage Learning ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means— graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, Web distribution, information storage and retrieval systems, or in any other manner—except as may be permitted by the license terms herein. For product information and technology assistance, contact us at Cengage Learning Customer & Sales......

Words: 234748 - Pages: 939